The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by President Obama and Prime Minister Abbott of Australia After Bilateral Meeting

Beijing, China

3:20 P.M. CST

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  I just want to express my appreciation to Prime Minister Abbott and his team, and the people of Australia not only for the upcoming G-20 and the arrangements that they've made for what I'm sure is going to be a very important discussion about global growth, but for the incredibly strong bilateral alliance and relationship between our peoples.  Time and again, Australia has stood shoulder to shoulder with the United States on issues of critical international security.  Today is no different. 

We have seen Australian participation as part of a coalition dealing with ISIL in Iraq.  They continue to be an outstanding member of the coalition in our efforts to stabilize Afghanistan.  Tony personally has expressed his extraordinary commitment to battling foreign fighters that threaten both of our homelands.  And obviously, the men and women of the Australian armed forces have terrific capabilities and on many occasions have made extraordinary sacrifice.  So first and foremost, I want to thank him for the security partnership that we have.

We also have a strong economic partnership.  And I'm certain that the G-20 will be productive because Tony has emphasized the need for us to emphasize growth and jobs.  That's true in Australia, that's true in the United States.  It's true around the world at a time when global demand continues to be weak, and we see certain regions of the world lagging behind the kind of growth rates that we'd like to see.  And so I'm looking forward to a very productive conversation there.

We also discussed the opportunities.  TPP is an obvious one, and Australia has been an outstanding partner on that front.  We have additional opportunities in APEC and the East Asia Summit to discuss how this incredibly dynamic region can cooperate more effectively together around issues like infrastructure, disaster relief, streamlining regulations to facilitate greater trade.  Throughout all this, we find that Australia consistently shares values, ideals, a sense of global responsibility that is unparalleled.  And we very much appreciate our friendship and our cooperation, and are confident that over the next several days we'll be making progress on all these fronts.

PRIME MINISTER ABBOTT:  Barack, thank you so much.  It's great to be here in Beijing with you and with obviously many other leaders. 

I see the next couple of days in Beijing here at APEC as being very much the right lead-in to the G-20 in Brisbane because essentially both APEC and the G-20 are about growth and jobs.  That's what the world needs.  It needs more growth.  And more growth means more jobs.

So I'm very pleased to be here.  I guess I should observe that one of the innovations of the G-20 this year has been not only to agree that we need more growth, but for all of the G-20 countries to put forward its plan for growth, and to submit individual country plans to a form of peer review.  And the fact that we've all been able to say not just that we want growth, but that we intend to get extra growth in a particular way, and then to let everyone know what that way is means that there's a good chance that it's actually going to get delivered because we'll be able to see in the months and years ahead how much of these growth strategies are actually being delivered.

But again, if I may say, it is always good to be with the President of the United States.  Australia and the United States are a great partnership.  And I want to thank President Obama for the leadership that he's shown in so many areas.  But obviously as we deal with the ISIL death cult in the Middle East, your leadership has been deft.  And Australia is very -- we don't like being -- the necessity of being part of the coalition, but it is a necessity.  And that's why we'll be a staunch member.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  All right, we've got time for a couple questions each.  We’ll start with Julie Pace of AP. 

Q      Thank you, Mr. President.  Can you give us a sense of what signals or outreach you received from the North Koreans that led to your decision to send James Clapper to secure the release of the Americans?  And do you see this breakthrough as a possible precursor to broader talks with North Korea on nuclear issues or other matters?

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  We had an indication that there was the possibility of the release of these two hostages or prisoners -- and we pursued it.  It did not touch on some of the broader issues that have been the source of primary concern when it comes to North Korea -- in particular, it's development of nuclear capacity.

There were not high-level policy discussions between Jim Clapper and the North Koreans.  But we have been consistent in saying that when and if North Korea becomes serious about denuclearization on the Peninsula and is prepared to have a conversation around that topic, then the United States is going to be very open to trying to arrive at a solution that over the long term could lead to greater prosperity and security for North Korea.

 Until that time, there's going to be a core problem between us.  And obviously I'm incredibly thankful to Jim Clapper for the efforts that he made.  And I couldn't be happier for the families as we enter into the holidays to know that their loved ones are back.  It's a good-news story.

We continue, though, to have a broader fundamental conflict with the North Koreans.  And it's going to take, I think in addition to small gestures like the ones that we saw -- the release of these individuals -- a broader understanding on the part of the North Koreans that all the countries in the region, including China, including the Republic of Korea, including Japan consider this to be their number-one security priority -- making sure that we do not have a nuclearized Korean Peninsula.  And up until this point at least, we had not seen serious engagement on the part of Pyongyang to deal with that problem.

Q       Did you get any better indication about Kim Jong-un and his strategy for dealing with the U.S. through these negotiations?

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  No.

PRIME MINISTER ABBOTT:  I think we have an Australia question?  Phil?

Q       Phil Currie, from the Australian Financial Review.  Mr. President, your government had conversations with our government about China's proposal for the Infrastructure Investment Bank in the region.  Could I ask you, sir, what your concerns were about that bank, what you relayed to our government?  Were they more strategic or were they financial?

And, Mr. Abbott, would you like to comment, as well? 

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  It's interesting.  We were talking before you came in about my belief that it's in all of our interest for China to be successful, prosperous and to be an outstanding international partner.

You want the most populous country in the world to be stable and successful.  And as China has undertaken this extraordinary journey over the last several decades, and we've seen unprecedented numbers of people move out of dire poverty into a more stable economic situation, it's all for the good if China then now becomes a contributor to broader international efforts to help less developed countries and to alleviate poverty elsewhere. 

 So not only are we not opposed to those efforts, we want to actively encourage efforts for China to make contributions to the international order.  But what we've consistently said is that it's important for China to uphold international rules and norms as it expands its influence both regionally and around the world.

So on something like an infrastructure bank in this region, making sure that there's transparency and accountability, and that if it's, in fact, a multilateral institution, that there are rules that all countries are abiding by in the operations of the institution.  Those are the same rules by which the World Bank or IMF or Asia Development Bank or any other international institutions needs to abide by.

When the United States helped to craft those institutions after World War II, the United States deliberately restrained itself in some ways, bound itself to certain norms and certain rules because we were confident that when everybody is following a set of rules of the road, all of us are better off -- large countries, small countries alike. 

And so I think our message, whether it's on the Asia Development Bank or on some of the maritime issues that have caused tension and consternation in the region, our message is that we want to see China successful.  Inevitably, they are going to have influence and exert a certain gravitational pull just by dint of size and what's happened with their economy and the extraordinary capabilities of their people.  But as they grow, we want them to be a partner in underwriting the international order, not undermining it.

PRIME MINISTER ABBOTT:  Phil, as you know, the Chinese have been promoting this for at least 12 months now.  And ever since the idea was first floated, many countries have been talking to China about it and amongst themselves about it.  So there’s been lots and lots of conversations with a whole range of people in countries about the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank. 

In principle, a new multilateral body to help promote infrastructure will be good for growth and good for jobs.  But it does, as far as we’re concerned, have to be a genuinely multilateral body; and as a genuinely multilateral body, would be very happy to be part of it -- and I think most countries would.  And I guess that’s what we’re looking to see.  We’re looking to see some evolution in the time ahead to a situation where this has the sorts of governance and transparency that other multilateral institutions have.

So it’s a body that no one country can unilaterally control.  And if and when we get that, I think it will be a good contributor to growth in our region and in the wider world.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Phil Mattingly.

Q       Thank you, Mr. President.  Chinese President Xi Jinping said yesterday that he backed how the current chief executive is handling protestors in Hong Kong.  I wondered if you agreed with that assessment.  And what, if any, concerns do you plan on raising about the issue while you’re here in Beijing?

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Our message has been consistent with President Xi and with his predecessors.  There are certain things that the United States believes.  We believe in freedom of speech.  We believe in freedom of association.  We believe in openness in government as befitting our traditions and our way of life.  We don’t expect China to follow an American model in every instance, but we’re going to continue to have concerns about human rights.  Obviously the situation between China and Hong Kong is historically complicated and is in the process of transition.  And I think our primary message has been to make sure that violence is avoided as the people of Hong Kong try to sort through what this next phase of their relationship is to the mainland.

But we’re not going to stop speaking out on behalf of the things that we care about, recognizing that we also have significant interest in business to do with China, and recognizing that China is not at the same place in terms of their development, both politically and economically, as we are today.  But I think it would be unrealistic to expect that we set those concerns aside because, as I’ve said in international forums as well as bilateral meetings, respect for human rights, respect for the dignity of individuals I don’t believe is unique to America, it’s not unique to the West.  I think people have aspirations for a certain amount of freedom and dignity, and the ability to shape their own lives all around the globe.  And I’m proud that despite the fact that in too many places those rights aren’t always observed, that we’re consistently a voice encouraging more space for those voices. 

When we travel to Burma later on this trip, you’re seeing an evolution that’s taking place there that’s powerful.  It’s incomplete, it takes place in fits and starts, but it’s something that ultimately I believe will result in greater prosperity and security for the people there.  And to the extent that we can be constructive partners and observers to that process, we will do so.

PRIME MINISTER ABBOTT:  I think there’s another Australian question.

Q       Thank you, Prime Minister.  A question for both gentlemen.  I’m sorry, Mark Kenny from Fairfax Media in Australia.  A question for both of you, if I may. 

Mr. President, you’ve recently increased your country’s commitment to the Iraq campaign against ISIL.  I’m wondering, was this specifically raised as a topic in the meeting you just had?  Did you put a request to Australia that it also increase its troop commitment or its military commitment to that effort?

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  It was a topic -- because as I said, Australia has been a stalwart contributor to this effort.  And Tony has been crystal clear about why it’s so important for us to defeat ISIL -- not only for the good of the region and the people of Iraq, but ultimately for the people of the United States and Australia and people around the world.

But what I explained to Tony was the same thing that I said in an interview yesterday in the United States.  We’re moving to a slightly different phase now.  Initially our goal was to stop the momentum of ISIL as it was sweeping through Iraq, and you were seeing too many Iraqi security force units scatter.  And although, particularly in Anbar Province in the west, you’re still seeing ISIL take over isolated towns, you haven’t seen the same momentum.

The situation with respect to Iraqi security forces has stabilized, although the number of effective units is significantly smaller than it needs to be.  So the next phase is for us to train and assist Iraqi security forces so that they can begin to build up and go on offense.  We can provide close air support, we can provide logistics and intelligence, but ultimately they’re the ones who are going to have to fight to push ISIL out of some of these areas that they’ve taken over.  And in order for us to do that, we’re going to have to have more trainers on the ground, and that is the reason why I authorized this additional number of U.S. troops.

What hasn’t changed is that it’s not our folks who are going to be doing the fighting.  Iraqis ultimately have to fight ISIL and they have to determine their own security.  But we are recognizing the need for us to ramp up Iraqi capabilities, not only the Iraqi security forces, but also some of the tribes in western Iraq that have shown a willingness to go against ISIL but are out-gunned and too often out-maneuvered at this stage.

Now, I recognize that the United States, as one member of the coalition, has some unique capabilities in setting up the template, setting up the structure for that training to take place in a way that protects our people, ensures that we have the kinds of enablers that make it safe for our folks to be there -- not without risk, but at least it protects them against extraordinary risks.

As we are setting that up, I am having conversations with Australia and other coalition partners that are already committed to putting trainers in to see how they can supplement and work with us in this overall effort.  But the key point that I emphasized to Tony and I’m emphasizing to all our coalition members is our task here is to help Iraqis help themselves.  This is not the same situation as we saw either in the Iraq war in 2003, 2004, 2005, or what we’ve been doing in Afghanistan where our men and women have been much more in the front lines.  It doesn’t mean that there are not risks involved, and I’m very mindful of making sure that as we look at these train-and-assist plans, that we’re setting up the best possible circumstance for what is an inherently dangerous job, but it does mean that the principle that we’re not engaged in direct combat, that continues.

PRIME MINISTER ABBOTT:  The President is absolutely right.  The ISIL death cult is a menace to the whole world.  They’ve declared war on the world.  And it’s good that the President, working with the Iraq government, has assembled a strong coalition to assist the Iraqi government to respond effectively and ultimately to regain control over its own territory.

I think it’s very important that we never lose sight of the fact that this death cult is, as declared Malaysia’s Prime Minister Najib, it’s against God, it’s against Islam, and it’s against our common humanity -- as we’ve seen repeatedly in recent months.

So it is important to respond strongly, which is what the U.S.-led coalition is doing.  There are various different missions here.  There’s the advise-and-assist mission.  There’s a developing train-and-assist mission.  Our priority at the moment is getting our special forces into Baghdad and then into the field on the advise-and-assist mission that we’ve sent them.  That’s happening, and I’m confident that our people will do good work.

But the point that the President makes is absolutely right.  In the end, no one is going to fight harder for Iraq than Iraqis will fight for themselves.  And that’s what we’re doing.  We’re helping them to reclaim their country from something which is evil, from something which is a menace to them, and if it’s allowed to remain, will be a menace to all of us.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Thank you very much, everybody.

END                            
3:44 P.M. CST

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Letter from the President -- FY 2015 Budget amendments

November 10, 2014

Dear Mr. Speaker:

I ask the Congress to consider the enclosed Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget amendments for the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of State and Other International Programs (State/OIP) to fund Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO). These amendments would provide $5.6 billion for OCO activities to degrade and ultimately defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) -- including military operations as part of Operation Inherent Resolve. 

Accordingly, this request would provide $5.0 billion for DOD OCO activities in addition to the $58.6 billion DOD OCO request I submitted to the Congress in June 2014, and would result in a total DOD OCO request for FY 2015 of $63.6 billion.  This amount is $15.8 billion less than the $79.4 billion placeholder for DOD OCO in the FY 2015 Budget. The request would also provide $520 million for State/OIP OCO activities, which is in addition to the $7.3 billion I requested for State/OIP OCO activities in the FY 2015 Budget and the June budget amendment.  

The approach to counter ISIL has evolved with emerging requirements identified subsequent to the June OCO amendment, and therefore not previously requested.  These amendments include the additional funding necessary to degrade and ultimately defeat ISIL through a comprehensive and sustained counterterrorism strategy.

The details of these amendments are set forth in the enclosed letter from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

BARACK OBAMA

President Obama Urges FCC to Implement Stronger Net Neutrality Rules

President Obama today asked the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to take up the strongest possible rules to protect net neutrality, the principle that says Internet service providers (ISPs) should treat all internet traffic equally.

The President has been a strong and consistent advocate of net neutrality since his first presidential campaign.

President Obama’s plan would reclassify consumer broadband services under what’s known as Title II of the Telecommunications Act. It would serve as a “basic acknowledgement of the services ISPs provide to American homes and businesses, and the straightforward obligations necessary to ensure the network works for everyone - not just one or two companies.”

Related Topics: Technology

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by the President on Net Neutrality

An open Internet is essential to the American economy, and increasingly to our very way of life.  By lowering the cost of launching a new idea, igniting new political movements, and bringing communities closer together, it has been one of the most significant democratizing influences the world has ever known.

“Net neutrality” has been built into the fabric of the Internet since its creation — but it is also a principle that we cannot take for granted.  We cannot allow Internet service providers (ISPs) to restrict the best access or to pick winners and losers in the online marketplace for services and ideas.  That is why today, I am asking the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to answer the call of almost 4 million public comments, and implement the strongest possible rules to protect net neutrality.

When I was a candidate for this office, I made clear my commitment to a free and open Internet, and my commitment remains as strong as ever.  Four years ago, the FCC tried to implement rules that would protect net neutrality with little to no impact on the telecommunications companies that make important investments in our economy.  After the rules were challenged, the court reviewing the rules agreed with the FCC that net neutrality was essential for preserving an environment that encourages new investment in the network, new online services and content, and everything else that makes up the Internet as we now know it.  Unfortunately, the court ultimately struck down the rules — not because it disagreed with the need to protect net neutrality, but because it believed the FCC had taken the wrong legal approach. 

The FCC is an independent agency, and ultimately this decision is theirs alone.  I believe the FCC should create a new set of rules protecting net neutrality and ensuring that neither the cable company nor the phone company will be able to act as a gatekeeper, restricting what you can do or see online.  The rules I am asking for are simple, common-sense steps that reflect the Internet you and I use every day, and that some ISPs already observe.  These bright-line rules include:

  • No blocking.  If a consumer requests access to a website or service, and the content is legal, your ISP should not be permitted to block it.  That way, every player — not just those commercially affiliated with an ISP — gets a fair shot at your business.
  • No throttling.  Nor should ISPs be able to intentionally slow down some content or speed up others — through a process often called “throttling” — based on the type of service or your ISP’s preferences.
  • Increased transparency.  The connection between consumers and ISPs — the so-called “last mile” — is not the only place some sites might get special treatment.  So, I am also asking the FCC to make full use of the transparency authorities the court recently upheld, and if necessary to apply net neutrality rules to points of interconnection between the ISP and the rest of the Internet.
  • No paid prioritization.  Simply put: No service should be stuck in a “slow lane” because it does not pay a fee.  That kind of gatekeeping would undermine the level playing field essential to the Internet’s growth.  So, as I have before, I am asking for an explicit ban on paid prioritization and any other restriction that has a similar effect.

If carefully designed, these rules should not create any undue burden for ISPs, and can have clear, monitored exceptions for reasonable network management and for specialized services such as dedicated, mission-critical networks serving a hospital.  But combined, these rules mean everything for preserving the Internet’s openness.

The rules also have to reflect the way people use the Internet today, which increasingly means on a mobile device.  I believe the FCC should make these rules fully applicable to mobile broadband as well, while recognizing the special challenges that come with managing wireless networks. 

To be current, these rules must also build on the lessons of the past.  For almost a century, our law has recognized that companies who connect you to the world have special obligations not to exploit the monopoly they enjoy over access in and out of your home or business.  That is why a phone call from a customer of one phone company can reliably reach a customer of a different one, and why you will not be penalized solely for calling someone who is using another provider.  It is common sense that the same philosophy should guide any service that is based on the transmission of information — whether a phone call, or a packet of data.

So the time has come for the FCC to recognize that broadband service is of the same importance and must carry the same obligations as so many of the other vital services do.  To do that, I believe the FCC should reclassify consumer broadband service under Title II of the Telecommunications Act — while at the same time forbearing from rate regulation and other provisions less relevant to broadband services.  This is a basic acknowledgment of the services ISPs provide to American homes and businesses, and the straightforward obligations necessary to ensure the network works for everyone — not just one or two companies.

Investment in wired and wireless networks has supported jobs and made America the center of a vibrant ecosystem of digital devices, apps, and platforms that fuel growth and expand opportunity. Importantly, network investment remained strong under the previous net neutrality regime, before it was struck down by the court; in fact, the court agreed that protecting net neutrality helps foster more investment and innovation.  If the FCC appropriately forbears from the Title II regulations that are not needed to implement the principles above — principles that most ISPs have followed for years — it will help ensure new rules are consistent with incentives for further investment in the infrastructure of the Internet.

The Internet has been one of the greatest gifts our economy — and our society — has ever known.  The FCC was chartered to promote competition, innovation, and investment in our networks.  In service of that mission, there is no higher calling than protecting an open, accessible, and free Internet.  I thank the Commissioners for having served this cause with distinction and integrity, and I respectfully ask them to adopt the policies I have outlined here, to preserve this technology’s promise for today, and future generations to come.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by President Obama at APEC CEO Summit

Beijing, China

4:51 P.M. CST

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Thank you so much.  Xiàwǔ hǎo.  (Applause.)  Thank you, Andrew, for that introduction.  I have had the pleasure of getting to know Andrew very well these past few years.  We have worked him hard –- he helped my administration with strategies for growing high-tech manufacturing to hiring more long-term unemployed.  He’s just as good at corporate citizenship as he is at running a corporation.  Later I’ll visit Brisbane, where I know Andrew spent some of his youth.  I’m sure he’s got some suggestions for fun there, but not necessarily things that a President can do.  (Laughter.)  We don’t know how he spent his youth, but I’m sure he had some fun.  

It is wonderful to be back in China, and I’m grateful for the Chinese people’s extraordinary hospitality.  This is my sixth trip to Asia as President, and my second this year alone.  And that’s because, as I’ve said on each of my visits, America is a thoroughly Pacific nation.  We’ve always had a history with Asia.  And our future -- our security and our prosperity -- is inextricably intertwined with Asia.  I know the business leaders in attendance today agree.

I’ve now had the privilege to address the APEC CEO summit in Singapore, in Yokohama, and in my original hometown of Honolulu, now in Beijing.  And I think it’s safe to say that few global forums are watched more closely by the business community.  There’s a good reason for that.  Taken together, APEC economies account for about 40 percent of the world’s population, and nearly 60 percent of its GDP.  That means we’re home to nearly three billion customers, and three-fifths of the global economy. 

And over the next five years, nearly half of all economic growth outside the United States is projected to come from right here, in Asia.  That makes this region an incredible opportunity for creating jobs and economic growth in the United States.  And any serious leader in America, whether in politics or in commerce, recognizes that fact.

Now the last time I addressed this CEO summit was three years ago.  Today, I’ve come back at a moment when, around the world, the United States is leading from a position of strength.  This year, of course, has seen its share of turmoil and uncertainty.  But whether it’s our fight to degrade and destroy the terrorist network known as ISIL, or to contain and combat the Ebola epidemic in West Africa, the one constant –- the one global necessity –- is and has been American leadership. 

And that leadership in the world is backed by the renewed strength of our economy at home.  Today, our businesses have created 10.6 million jobs over the longest uninterrupted stretch of job growth in American history.  We’re on pace for the best year of job growth since the 1990s.  Since we started creating jobs again, the U.S. has put more people back to work than Europe, Japan, and every other advanced economy combined. 

And when you factor in what’s happening in our broader economy –- a manufacturing sector that as Andrew said is growing now at a rapid pace; graduation rates that are rising; deficits that have shrunk by two-thirds; health care inflation at 50-year lows; and an energy boom at new highs –- when you put all this together, what you get is an American economy that is primed for steadier, more sustained growth, and better poised to lead and succeed in the 21st century than just about any other nation on Earth.

And you don’t have to take our word for it –- take yours.  For two years in a row, business executives like all of you have said that the world's most attractive place to invest is the United States.  And we're going to go for a three-peat.  We're going to try to make it the same this year.

But despite the responsibilities of American leadership around the world, despite our attention to getting our economy growing, there should be no doubt that the United States of America remains entirely committed when it comes to Asia.  America is a Pacific power, and we are leading to promote shared security and shared economic growth this century, just as we did in the last.

In fact, one of my core messages throughout this trip -- from APEC to the East Asia Summit to the G20 in Australia -- is that working together we need growth that is balanced, growth that is strong, growth that is sustainable, and growth where prosperity is shared by everybody who is willing to work hard.

As President of the United States I make no apologies for doing whatever I can to bring new jobs and new industries to America.  But I've always said, in the 21st century, the pursuit of economic growth, job creation and trade is not a zero-sum game.  One country's prosperity doesn't have to come at the expense of another.  If we work together and act together, strengthening the economic ties between our nations will benefit all of our nations.  That's true for the nations of APEC, and I believe it's particularly true for the relationship between the United States and China.  (Applause.)

I've had the pleasure of hosting President Xi twice in the United States.  The last time we met, in California, he pointed out that the Pacific Ocean is big enough for both of our nations.  And I agree.  The United States welcomes the rise of a prosperous, peaceful and stable China.  I want to repeat that.  (Applause.)  I want to repeat that:  We welcome the rise of a prosperous, peaceful and stable China. 

In fact, over recent decades the United States has worked to help integrate China into the global economy -- not only because it's in China's best interest, but because it's in America's best interest, and the world's best interest.  We want China to do well.  (Applause.)

We compete for business, but we also seek to cooperate on a broad range of shared challenges and shared opportunities.  Whether it's stopping the spread of Ebola, or preventing nuclear -- preventing nuclear proliferation, or deepening our clean energy partnership, combating climate change, a leadership role that, as the world's two largest economies and two largest carbon emitters, we have a special responsibility to embrace. 

If China and the United States can work together, the world benefits.  And that's something this audience is acutely interested in.  (Applause.)  We continually have to work to strengthen the bilateral trade and investment between our two nations.  America's first trade mission visited China just a year after America's revolution ended.  Two hundred and thirty years later, we are the two largest economies in the world. 

And the trade and investment relationship we have benefits both of our countries.  China is our fastest growing export market.  Chinese direct investment in the United States has risen six-fold over the past five years.  Chinese firms directly employ a rapidly growing number of Americans.  And all these things mean jobs for the American people; and deepening these ties will mean more jobs and opportunity for both of our peoples.

And that's why I'm very pleased to announce that during my visit the United States and China have agreed to implement a new arrangement for visas that will benefit everyone from students, to tourists, to businesses large and small.  Under the current arrangement, visas between our two countries last for only one year.  Under the new arrangement, student and exchange visas will be extended to five years; business and tourist visas will be extended to 10 years.  (Applause.)

Now, of course, that will be good for the businessmen who are going back and forth all the time.  But keep in mind, last year, 1.8 million Chinese visitors to the United States contributed $21 billion to our economy and supported more than 100,000 American jobs.  This agreement could help us more than quadruple those numbers.

I've heard from American business leaders about how valuable this step will be.  And we've worked hard to achieve this outcome because it clearly serves the mutual interest of both of our countries.  (Applause.)  So I'm proud that during my visit to China we will mark this important breakthrough, which will benefit our economies and bring our people together, and I’m pleased that President Xi has been a partner in getting this done –- very much appreciate his work on this.  (Applause.)

Now, deepening our economic ties is why I also hope to make progress with President Xi towards an ambitious, high-standard, bilateral investment treaty that opens up China’s economy to American investors -- an agreement that could unlock even more progress and more opportunity in both of our countries.  We’re also working together to put -- in pursuit of an international agreement on the ITA.  And we’ll speak directly and candidly, as we always do, about specific actions China can take to help all of us, across the Asia-Pacific, to expand trade and investment, which many of the CEOs I talk to raise in our discussions.

We look to China to create a more level playing field on which foreign companies are treated fairly so that they can compete fairly with Chinese companies; a playing field where competition policy promotes the welfare of consumers and doesn’t benefit just one set of companies over another.  We look to China to become an innovative economy that values the protection of intellectual property rights, and rejects cybertheft of trade secrets for commercial gain.  We look to China to approve biotechnology advances that are critical to feeding a growing planet on the same timeline as other countries, to move definitively toward a more market-determined exchange rate, and, yes, to stand up for human rights and freedom of the press.  And we don’t suggest these things because they’re good for us; we suggest that China do these things for the sake of sustainable growth in China, and the stability of the Asia-Pacific region.  And I look forward to discussing these issues, along with China’s concerns and ideas, with President Xi over the next few days.

Now even as America works to deepen our bilateral ties with China, we’re focused this week on deepening our ties with all the APEC economies, including reducing barriers to trade and investment, so that companies like yours can grow, create new jobs, and promote prosperity across the Asia-Pacific region. 

After all, Asia’s largest export market is the United States -- that benefits American consumers because it has led to more affordable goods and services.  Six of America’s top 10 export markets are APEC economies, and more than 60 percent of our exports –- over $1 trillion worth of goods and services -– are purchased by APEC economies.  That supports millions of American jobs.

So the work that APEC members have done together over the years has lowered tariffs, cut shipping costs, and made it cheaper, easier, and faster to do business – and that supports good jobs in all of our nations.  We’ve worked together to improve food security, encourage clean energy, promote education, and deliver disaster relief.  And all of this has made a difference. 

But we can always do more.  We can do more to reduce barriers to trade and economic growth.  Since 2006, we’ve worked together toward the ultimate goal of a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific, and APEC has shown a number of pathways that could make it a reality.  And one of those pathways is the Trans-Pacific Partnership between the United States and 11 other nations.  Once complete, this partnership will bring nearly 40 percent of the global economy under an agreement that means increased trade, greater investment, and more jobs for its member countries; a level playing field on which businesses can compete; high standards that protect workers, the environment, and intellectual property.  And I just met with several other members of the TPP who share my desire to make this agreement a reality, we’re going to keep on working to get it done.  For we believe that this is the model for trade in the 21st century.

Agreements like this will benefit our economies and our people.  But they also send a strong message that what’s important isn’t just whether our economies continue to grow, but how they grow; that what’s best for our people isn’t a race to the bottom, but a race to the top.  Obviously, ensuring the continued growth and stability of the Asia-Pacific requires more than a focus on growing trade and investment. 

Steady, sustainable growth requires making it easier for small businesses to access capital and new markets.  And when about one-third of small businesses in the region are run by women, then steady, sustainable growth requires every woman’s ability to fully participate in the economy.  That’s true in the United States and that’s true everywhere.

Steady, sustainable growth requires promoting policies and practices that keep the Internet open and accessible.

Steady, sustainable growth requires a planet where citizens can breathe clean air, and drink clean water, and eat safe food, and make a living fishing healthy oceans.

Steady, sustainable growth requires mobilizing the talents and resources of all our people –- regardless of gender, or religion, or color, or creed; offering them the opportunity to participate in open and transparent political and economic systems; where we cast a harsh light on bribery and corruption, and a well-deserved spotlight on those who strive to play by the rules.

Those are all some of the areas we’ll be focused on at APEC this week, and going forward.  And obviously every country is different –- no country is following the same model.  But there are things that bind us together, and despite our differences, we know there are certain standards and ideals that will benefit all people. 

We know that if given a choice, our young people would demand more access to the world’s information, not less.  We know that if allowed to organize, our workers would better -- demand working conditions that don’t injure them, that keep them safe; that they’re looking for stronger labor and environmental safeguards, not weaker.  We know that if given a voice, women wouldn’t say give us less; they’d speak up for more access to markets, more access to capital, more seats in our legislature and our boardrooms.

So these are all key issues in growth as well.  Sometimes we focus just on trade and investment and dollars and cents, but these things are important as well.  These ideals aren’t just topics for summits and state visits.  They’re touchstones of the world that we’re going to leave to our children.  The United States is not just here in Asia to check a box; we’re here because we believe our shared future is here in Asia, just as our shared past has been. 

We’re looking to a future where a worker in any of our countries can afford to provide for his family; where his daughter can go to school and start a business and have a fair shot at success; where fundamental rights are cherished, and protected, and not denied.  And that future is one where our success is defined less by armies and less by bureaucrats, and more by entrepreneurs, and innovators, by dreamers and doers, by business leaders who focus as much on the workers they empower as the prosperity that they create.  That’s future that we see.  That’s why we’re here.  It’s why we’ve worked so closely together these past several years.  And as long as I’m America’s President, I’m going to be invested in your success because I believe it is essential to our success as well. 

Thank you very much.  Xièxiè.

END
5:11 P.M. CST

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President Before TPP Meeting

Beijing, China

1:17 P.M. CST

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  I want to thank all my fellow peers and the trade ministers for joining us here today.  I know we all have very busy schedules, so I’m going to keep my remarks brief.

We’re here today because the Trans-Pacific Partnership is a high priority for our nations and for the region.  As President, strengthening American leadership in the Asia Pacific has been one of my top foreign policy priorities.  And central to that objective is working with some of our most important trading partners to find ways in which we can facilitate increased growth for all of us, increased investment for all of us, improve jobs prospects for all of us. 

And what we are seeing is momentum building around a Trans-Pacific Partnership that can spur greater economic growth, spur greater jobs growth, set high standards for trade and investment throughout the Asia Pacific.  And I don’t think I have to explain to the press why this region is so important.  This is the fastest-growing, most populous, most dynamic region in the world economically.

During the past few weeks, our teams have made good progress in resolving several outstanding issues regarding a potential agreement.  Today is an opportunity at the political level for us to break some remaining logjams.  To ensure that TPP is a success, we also have to make sure that all of our people back home understand the benefits for them -- that it means more trade, more good jobs, and higher incomes for people throughout the region, including the United States.  And that’s the case that I’ll continue to make to Congress and the American people.  And I know that the leaders here are committed to making that case as well.

This has the potential for being a historic achievement.  It’s now up to all of us to see if we can finalize a deal that is both ambitious and comprehensive.  The stronger the agreement, the greater the benefits to our people.

So to all my fellow leaders, I want to thank you not just for your participation here today but, more importantly, for the mandate that you have given to your negotiating teams to engage in some very serious work that promises to deliver greater prosperity, trade and commerce between our nations in the future.

Thank you very much.

END
1:19 P.M. CST

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by President Obama and President Widodo of Indonesia before Bilateral Meeting

Beijing, China

11:46 A.M. CST

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, it is a pleasure to meet President Widodo.  I want to congratulate him on an inspiring election.  And as many of you know, I have a very close association with Indonesia, having spent a good deal of my childhood there.

I think that in watching President Widodo’s election, it is once again an affirmation of the full transition that Indonesia has made to a thriving democracy and a model for the kind of tolerance and pluralism that we want to see all around the world.

I know that President Widodo has a very ambitious reform agenda, and my main message here today is that the United States wants to be a strong partner with Indonesia in helping achieve its goals.

As part of our comprehensive partnership we’ve already worked on a wide range of issues -- economic, development, security, people-to-people exchanges, environmental cooperation -- and I look forward to discussing how we can build on that momentum, perhaps even with a visit by President Widodo in Washington next year.

I also want to thank Indonesia for the leadership regionally, as well as internationally, that it has shown on a number of issues.  As a leader in ASEAN, Indonesia has been a driving force around the work that we’ve done on disaster assistance, on education, on scientific and technical exchanges, as well as issues of maritime security.  And both our countries agree that it’s important for us to maintain international norms that ensure freedom of navigation, and that all countries are treated fairly and equitably.

And finally, as one of the world’s largest democracies and also as one of the world’s largest Islamic populations, Indonesia has played an extraordinary role in promoting pluralism and respect for religious diversity.  And I want to thank Indonesia in the work that it’s done to isolate extremism and to work with other countries around counterterrorism efforts.

So, Mr. President, I very much appreciate the opportunity to meet with you.  I hope that we can develop not only a strong personal friendship but can continue to build the strong friendship between our two peoples.

PRESIDENT WIDODO:  (As interpreted.)  I would like to thank Your Excellency and this will be the first time that I meet President Obama.  I would like to also thank you for your special envoy, the Secretary of State, John Kerry, for his visit to my inauguration ceremony.

Indonesia is the largest Muslim country in the world and has just conducted its presidential election, a cause for the democratic celebration in our country.  And it shows that Islam and democracy can go forward.

In regards to extremism and radicalism, we have an experience of more than 30 years and we will continue to fight this extremism and radicalism, and not only by a security approach but also by a cultural approach and also a religious approach.

With regards to the stability -- security stability in the region, we will continue cooperation among countries in responding to security issues in the region.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Thank you very much, everybody.

END
11:55 A.M. CST

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Trans-Pacific Partnership Leaders’ Statement

November 10, 2014

We, the Leaders of Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, United States, and Vietnam, welcome the significant progress in recent months, as reported to us by our Ministers, that sets the stage to bring these landmark Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations to conclusion. We are encouraged that Ministers and negotiators have narrowed the remaining gaps on the legal text of the agreement and that they are intensively engaging to complete ambitious and balanced packages to open our markets to one another, in accordance with the instructions we gave them in Bali a year ago. With the end coming into focus, we have instructed our Ministers and negotiators to make concluding this agreement a top priority so that our businesses, workers, farmers, and consumers can start to reap the real and substantial benefits of the TPP agreement as soon as possible.

As we mobilize our teams to conclude the negotiations, we remain committed to ensuring that the final agreement reflects our common vision of an ambitious, comprehensive, high-standard, and balanced agreement that enhances the competitiveness of our economies, promotes innovation and entrepreneurship, spurs economic growth and prosperity, and supports job creation in our countries. We are dedicated to ensuring that the benefits of the agreement serve to promote development that is sustainable, broad based and inclusive, and that the agreement takes into account the diversity of our levels of development.  The gains that TPP will bring to each of our countries can expand even further should the open approach we are developing extend more broadly throughout the region.  We remain committed to a TPP structure that can include other regional partners that are prepared to adopt its high standards.

Our fundamental direction to our Ministers throughout this process has been to negotiate an outcome that will generate the greatest possible benefit for each of our countries.  In order to achieve that, our governments have worked to reflect the input we each have received from our stakeholders in the negotiation.  Continued engagement will be critical as our Ministers work to resolve the remaining issues in the negotiation.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by NSC Spokesperson Bernadette Meehan on the Situation in Eastern Ukraine

We are very concerned by intensified fighting in eastern Ukraine, as well as numerous reports, including from the Special Monitoring Mission of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), that Russian backed and supplied separatists are moving large convoys of heavy weapons and tanks to the front lines of the conflict.  We continue to call on all sides to strictly adhere to the cease-fire.  Any attempt by separatist forces to seize additional territory in eastern Ukraine would be a blatant violation of the Minsk agreements.  We reiterate our call on the Russian Federation to honor all of the commitments it made in Minsk, including ending its military supply to the separatists and the withdrawal of all of its troops and weapons from Ukraine.  Furthermore, Russia must enable the restoration of Ukrainian sovereignty along the Ukrainian side of the international border, to be monitored by the OSCE, and facilitate the release of all hostages.  We continue to stress that adherence to the framework agreed upon in Minsk is the best chance of achieving a peaceful resolution to the conflict in eastern Ukraine. 

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at Nomination of Loretta Lynch for Attorney General

Roosevelt Room

11:27 A.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT:  Have a seat, everybody.  Good morning.  As President, I rely on my Cabinet every day to make sure that we are not just getting the job done, but we’re making progress for the American people.  And in a country that is built on the rule of law, there are few offices more important than that of Attorney General.

The Attorney General is the people’s lawyer.  As our nation’s chief law enforcement officer, the person in this position is responsible for enforcing our federal laws, including protecting our civil rights.  Working with the remarkable men and women of the Justice Department, the Attorney General oversees the vast portfolio of cases, including counterterrorism and voting rights; public corruption and white-collar crime; judicial recommendations and policy reviews –- all of which impact on the lives of every American, and shape the life of our nation.

As I said back in September when he decided to step down, I am enormously grateful to Eric Holder for his outstanding service in this position.  He is one of the longest-serving Attorney Generals in American history, and one of our finest.  Eric brought to this job a belief that justice isn’t just an abstract theory, but a living, breathing principle.  It’s about how laws interact with the daily lives of our people -– whether we can make an honest living, whether we can provide for our families; whether we feel safe in our own communities and welcome in our own country; whether the words that the founders set to paper 238 years ago apply to every one of us in our time.

So thanks to Eric, our nation is safer and freer, and more Americans -- regardless of race or religion, or gender or creed, or sexual orientation or disability -– receive fair and equal treatment under the law.  I couldn’t be prouder of Eric.  And I couldn’t be prouder that today, I can announce somebody who shares that fierce commitment to equal justice under the law as my nominee for the next Attorney General, U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch.  (Applause.) 

I also, by the way, want to thank the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Patrick Leahy, for being here on a Saturday to show his support.  (Applause.)   

It’s pretty hard to be more qualified for this job than Loretta.  Throughout her 30-year career, she has distinguished herself as tough, as fair, an independent lawyer who has twice headed one of the most prominent U.S. Attorney’s offices in the country.  She has spent years in the trenches as a prosecutor, aggressively fighting terrorism, financial fraud, cybercrime, all while vigorously defending civil rights.

A graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School, Loretta rose from Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of New York to Chief of the Long Island Office, Chief Assistant U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney.  She successfully prosecuted the terrorists who plotted the bomb -- plotted to bomb the Federal Reserve Bank and the New York City subway.  She has boldly gone after public corruption, bringing charges against public officials in both parties.  She’s helped secure billions in settlements from some of the world’s biggest banks accused of fraud, and jailed some of New York’s most violent and notorious mobsters and gang members. 

One of her proudest achievements was the civil rights prosecution of the officers involved in the brutal assault of the Haitian immigrant Abner Louima.  Loretta might be the only lawyer in America who battles mobsters and drug lords and terrorists, and still has the reputation for being a charming “people person.”  (Laughter.)   

That’s probably because Loretta doesn’t look to make headlines, she looks to make a difference.  She’s not about splash, she is about substance.  I could not be more confident that Loretta will bring her signature intelligence and passion and commitment to our key priorities, including important reforms in our criminal justice system. 

She has consistently proven her leadership and earned the trust and respect of those she serves.  Since 2010, she has been a member of the committee of the U.S. Attorneys across the nation who advise the Attorney General on matters of policy, and she has served as chair of that committee since 2013.  So it’s no wonder that the Senate unanimously confirmed her to be the head of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in two separate situations –- once under President Clinton and once under my administration.  And it’s my hope that the Senate will confirm her a third time without delay.

At every stage in her career, Loretta has followed the principles of fairness, equality, and justice that she absorbed as a young girl.  She was born in Greensboro, North Carolina, the year before black students there sat down at a whites-only lunch counter, helping to spark a movement that would change the course of this country. 

The daughter of a school librarian and a fourth-generation Baptist minister -- which meant that she knew when to be quiet -- (laughter) -- that’s a little intimidating, being the daughter of a librarian and a minister -- (laughter) -- Loretta rode on her father’s shoulders to his church, where students would meet to organize anti-segregation boycotts.  She was inspired by stories about her grandfather, a sharecropper in the 1930s, who helped folks in his community who got in trouble with the law and had no recourse under the Jim Crow system.  I know that if he were here today, he would be just as proud of her as I’m sure her husband Stephen is.  I want to thank Stephen, Loretta’s stepson Ryan, her stepdaughter Kia, and her other family members who came here today.  We appreciate you guys agreeing to share her with the American people a little bit longer. 

Loretta has spent her life fighting for fair and equal justice that is the foundation of our democracy.  I can think of no better public servant to be our next Attorney General.  Let me introduce to you, Ms. Loretta Lynch.  (Applause.) 

MS. LYNCH:  Thank you, everyone.  And thank you, first of all, Mr. President, for that kind introduction.  But most importantly, thank you also for your faith in me in asking me to succeed an Attorney General whom I admire, and to lead the Department that I love.

Now, no one gets to this place, this room, this podium, this moment by themselves.  I also must thank Attorney General Eric Holder for your support and your friendship over the years, as well as by leading by example, and always, always pushing this Department to live up to its name.  And I want to thank Chairman Leahy, senior officials of the Department of Justice, and members of the Cabinet for being here today.

To my colleagues in the U.S. Attorney community and throughout the Department, on whose strength and wisdom I lean every day, thank all of you, as well, for your support both now and in all the work that we have ahead. 

And to my beloved office, the Eastern District of New York, my professional home -- you have twice now given me the privilege of being able to serve you, and to focus on nothing -- nothing -- but the protection of the American people.  It has been a joy.  It has been an honor.  And I will carry you with me wherever I go.  

And of course, to my wonderful family, several of whom are here with me today, all of whom are always with me in love and support -- most especially my parents, who could not be here today but are watching, whose every thought and sacrifice has always been for their children.  They have supported me in all of my endeavors as I strive to live up to their example of service. 

The Department of Justice is the only Cabinet Department named for an ideal.  And this is actually appropriate, because our work is both aspirational, and grounded in gritty reality.  It’s both ennobling, and it’s both profoundly challenging.

Today, I stand before you so thrilled, and, frankly, so humbled to have the opportunity to lead this group of wonderful people who work all day and well into the night to make that ideal a manifest reality, all as part of their steadfast protection of the citizens of this country.

Mr. President, thank you again for the faith that you’ve placed in me.  I pledge today to you and to the American people that if I have the honor of being confirmed by the Senate, I will wake up every morning with the protection of the American people my first thought.  And I will work every day to safeguard our citizens, our liberties, our rights, and this great nation which have given so much to me and my family.

I thank you again, Mr. President and Mr. Attorney General, and all of you, for being here.  (Applause.) 

Q    -- the release of Americans from North Korea today?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I think it’s a wonderful day for them and their families.  And obviously, we’re very grateful for their safe return.  And I appreciate Director Clapper doing a great job on what was obviously a challenging mission.

END     11:37 A.M. EST