The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at the 50th Anniversary of the Presidential Medal of Freedom

National Museum of American History

7:26 P.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT:  Good evening, everybody.  Please have a seat.  Michelle and I are so pleased to join you tonight to honor the legacy of an American leader in a building dedicated to the preservation of our American history. 

And we are thrilled to be joined by so many people whose accomplishments helped write new chapters in that history.  This morning, I recognized 16 brilliant, compassionate, wildly talented people with the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian award.  And that was intimidating enough.  Tonight, I’m facing dozens of you. 

To the Presidential Medal of Freedom recipients of this year and years past, it is a great honor to be with you for this anniversary celebration.  To Wayne Clough, thank you for hosting us and for all the Smithsonian does to enrich our cultural heritage.  And to Jack, I have to say that our new ambassador to Japan, I’m sure, would be pleased with how you performed this evening.  I’ll give her a full report.  (Laughter.)  To all the family members of the Kennedy family, we are grateful for your presence and your enduring contributions to the life of our country.

For centuries, awards have existed for military valor.  And fifty years ago, President John F. Kennedy established a way to award extraordinary civilian virtue -- contributions to our country, service to our democracy, a dedication to our humanity that has advanced the common interest of freedom-loving people, both here at home and around the world. 

Since its creation, the Presidential Medal of Freedom has paid tribute to the creativity of writers, and artists, and entertainers.  We’ve recognized the leadership of elected officials and civil rights organizers; the imagination of scientists and business leaders; the grit and determination of our astronauts and our athletes.   Because there is no one way to contribute to the success of America.  What makes us great is that we believe in a certain set of values that encourage freedom of expression and aspiration.  We celebrate imagination and education and occasional rebellion.  And we refuse to set limits on what we can do or who we can be. 

Other peoples in other times have marked their history by moments of conquest at war, by dominion over empires.  But in the arc of human history, the American experience stands apart, because our triumph is not simply found in the exertion of our power; it’s found in the example of our people. Our particular genius over 237 years has been something more than the sum of our individual excellence, but rather a culmination of our common endeavors.

It’s a truth that resonated with President Kennedy when he said, “…I am certain that after the dust of centuries has passed over our cities, we…will be remembered not for our victories or defeats in battle or in politics, but for our contribution to the human spirit.”

And that unbending belief -- that the power to make great a nation is found in its people and in their freedom -- that was his philosophy.  That is his legacy. 

And it’s a legacy told in villages around the world that have clean water, or a new school, and a steady friend in the United States, thanks to the volunteers of the Peace Corps.  It’s a legacy found in the courage of all who serve under our proud flag, willing, like President Kennedy himself, to pay any price and bear any burden for the survival and success of our liberty. 

It’s a legacy on display in the arts and culture that he and Jackie championed as part of our national character, a legacy planted on the moon that he said that we’d visit and that we did, in the stars beyond, but also in the breakthroughs of the generations of scientists that his audacious promise inspired.

It’s a legacy continued by his brothers and his sisters, who have left this a more gentle and compassionate country.  Jean, a Medal of Freedom recipient herself and a diplomat in every sense, is with us tonight.  Bobby, whose wife, Ethel is one of my dearest friends, as Jack noted, would be celebrating Bobby’s 88th birthday today.  Eunice and Pat were devoted advocates for Americans of all abilities.  And Teddy, the youngest brother with the biggest heart -- he was a happy warrior who we were sent here to serve and waged a decades-long battle on behalf of those folks who sent us here -– for workers’ rights, and immigrants’ rights, and the right to affordable health care.  Tonight, our sympathies are with the love of Teddy’s life, Vicki, as she mourns the loss of her father, Judge Edmund Reggie. 

And it’s all tolled a legacy of service that the Kennedy family continues to this day -- from Caroline, who’s already drawing crowds of her own as she settles into her role as ambassador to Japan; to his great-nephew, and Massachusetts’ newest Congressman, Joe Kennedy; to the school of public service that bears the family name and teaches its young leaders how they, too, might one day pass the torch to a new generation.

This is a legacy of a man who could have retreated to a life of luxury and ease, but who chose to live a life in the arena -- sailing sometimes against the wind, sometimes with it.  And that’s why, 50 years later, John F. Kennedy stands for posterity as he did in life -- young, and bold, and daring.  And he stays with us in our imagination not because he left us too soon, but because he embodied the character of the people he led.  Resilient, resolute.  Fearless and fun-loving.  Defiant in the face of impossible odds and, most of all, determined to make the world anew -- not settling for what is but rather for what might be.  And in his idealism –- his sober, square-jawed idealism –- we are reminded that the power to change this country is ours.

This afternoon, Michelle and I were joined by President Clinton and Secretary Clinton to pay tribute to that proud legacy.  We had a chance to lay a wreath at the gravesite at Arlington, where President Kennedy is surrounded by his wife and younger brothers, and where he will rest in peace for all time, remembered not just for his victories in battle or in politics, but for the words he uttered all those years ago:  “We…will be remembered…for our contribution to the human spirit.”

How blessed we are to live in a country where these contributions overflow in ways both heralded and not so heralded.  The thousands of people in San Francisco who helped a little boy recovering from cancer live out his superhero dreams -- that’s part of that spirit.  The Marines deploying relief after a devastating typhoon and all across an ocean, people checking on their neighbors after a tornado; the families across the country who will spend Thanksgiving Day cooking feasts so others less fortunate might eat -- that’s part of the spirit. 

That’s who we are -- a people whose greatness comes not by settling for what we can achieve in our own lives, but also because we dare to ask what we can do, as citizens, to contribute to this grand experiment we call America.

And that’s what our Presidential Medal of Freedom honorees embody, each and every one of them who are here today and those who we remember posthumously.  That’s the living legacy of the Kennedy family.  And that is the responsibility we all welcome, as Americans, for our lifetime on this planet.

We are extraordinarily blessed to be Americans because we have the opportunity to serve in ways that so many of you have served, because we have the opportunity to touch lives in the ways that so many of you have touched lives.

God bless you all, and God bless the United States of America.

President Obama Speaks at a Dinner in Honor of Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipients

November 20, 2013 | 10:33 | Public Domain

President Obama delivers remarks at a dinner in honor of Presidential Medal of Freedom awardees at the Smithsonian National Museum of American History.

Download mp4 (387MB) | mp3 (26MB)

Read the Transcript

Remarks by the President at the 50th Anniversary of the Presidential Medal of Freedom

National Museum of American History

7:26 P.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT:  Good evening, everybody.  Please have a seat.  Michelle and I are so pleased to join you tonight to honor the legacy of an American leader in a building dedicated to the preservation of our American history. 

And we are thrilled to be joined by so many people whose accomplishments helped write new chapters in that history.  This morning, I recognized 16 brilliant, compassionate, wildly talented people with the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian award.  And that was intimidating enough.  Tonight, I’m facing dozens of you. 

To the Presidential Medal of Freedom recipients of this year and years past, it is a great honor to be with you for this anniversary celebration.  To Wayne Clough, thank you for hosting us and for all the Smithsonian does to enrich our cultural heritage.  And to Jack, I have to say that our new ambassador to Japan, I’m sure, would be pleased with how you performed this evening.  I’ll give her a full report.  (Laughter.)  To all the family members of the Kennedy family, we are grateful for your presence and your enduring contributions to the life of our country.

For centuries, awards have existed for military valor.  And fifty years ago, President John F. Kennedy established a way to award extraordinary civilian virtue -- contributions to our country, service to our democracy, a dedication to our humanity that has advanced the common interest of freedom-loving people, both here at home and around the world. 

Since its creation, the Presidential Medal of Freedom has paid tribute to the creativity of writers, and artists, and entertainers.  We’ve recognized the leadership of elected officials and civil rights organizers; the imagination of scientists and business leaders; the grit and determination of our astronauts and our athletes.   Because there is no one way to contribute to the success of America.  What makes us great is that we believe in a certain set of values that encourage freedom of expression and aspiration.  We celebrate imagination and education and occasional rebellion.  And we refuse to set limits on what we can do or who we can be. 

Other peoples in other times have marked their history by moments of conquest at war, by dominion over empires.  But in the arc of human history, the American experience stands apart, because our triumph is not simply found in the exertion of our power; it’s found in the example of our people. Our particular genius over 237 years has been something more than the sum of our individual excellence, but rather a culmination of our common endeavors.

It’s a truth that resonated with President Kennedy when he said, “…I am certain that after the dust of centuries has passed over our cities, we…will be remembered not for our victories or defeats in battle or in politics, but for our contribution to the human spirit.”

And that unbending belief -- that the power to make great a nation is found in its people and in their freedom -- that was his philosophy.  That is his legacy. 

And it’s a legacy told in villages around the world that have clean water, or a new school, and a steady friend in the United States, thanks to the volunteers of the Peace Corps.  It’s a legacy found in the courage of all who serve under our proud flag, willing, like President Kennedy himself, to pay any price and bear any burden for the survival and success of our liberty. 

It’s a legacy on display in the arts and culture that he and Jackie championed as part of our national character, a legacy planted on the moon that he said that we’d visit and that we did, in the stars beyond, but also in the breakthroughs of the generations of scientists that his audacious promise inspired.

It’s a legacy continued by his brothers and his sisters, who have left this a more gentle and compassionate country.  Jean, a Medal of Freedom recipient herself and a diplomat in every sense, is with us tonight.  Bobby, whose wife, Ethel is one of my dearest friends, as Jack noted, would be celebrating Bobby’s 88th birthday today.  Eunice and Pat were devoted advocates for Americans of all abilities.  And Teddy, the youngest brother with the biggest heart -- he was a happy warrior who we were sent here to serve and waged a decades-long battle on behalf of those folks who sent us here -– for workers’ rights, and immigrants’ rights, and the right to affordable health care.  Tonight, our sympathies are with the love of Teddy’s life, Vicki, as she mourns the loss of her father, Judge Edmund Reggie. 

And it’s all tolled a legacy of service that the Kennedy family continues to this day -- from Caroline, who’s already drawing crowds of her own as she settles into her role as ambassador to Japan; to his great-nephew, and Massachusetts’ newest Congressman, Joe Kennedy; to the school of public service that bears the family name and teaches its young leaders how they, too, might one day pass the torch to a new generation.

This is a legacy of a man who could have retreated to a life of luxury and ease, but who chose to live a life in the arena -- sailing sometimes against the wind, sometimes with it.  And that’s why, 50 years later, John F. Kennedy stands for posterity as he did in life -- young, and bold, and daring.  And he stays with us in our imagination not because he left us too soon, but because he embodied the character of the people he led.  Resilient, resolute.  Fearless and fun-loving.  Defiant in the face of impossible odds and, most of all, determined to make the world anew -- not settling for what is but rather for what might be.  And in his idealism –- his sober, square-jawed idealism –- we are reminded that the power to change this country is ours.

This afternoon, Michelle and I were joined by President Clinton and Secretary Clinton to pay tribute to that proud legacy.  We had a chance to lay a wreath at the gravesite at Arlington, where President Kennedy is surrounded by his wife and younger brothers, and where he will rest in peace for all time, remembered not just for his victories in battle or in politics, but for the words he uttered all those years ago:  “We…will be remembered…for our contribution to the human spirit.”

How blessed we are to live in a country where these contributions overflow in ways both heralded and not so heralded.  The thousands of people in San Francisco who helped a little boy recovering from cancer live out his superhero dreams -- that’s part of that spirit.  The Marines deploying relief after a devastating typhoon and all across an ocean, people checking on their neighbors after a tornado; the families across the country who will spend Thanksgiving Day cooking feasts so others less fortunate might eat -- that’s part of the spirit. 

That’s who we are -- a people whose greatness comes not by settling for what we can achieve in our own lives, but also because we dare to ask what we can do, as citizens, to contribute to this grand experiment we call America.

And that’s what our Presidential Medal of Freedom honorees embody, each and every one of them who are here today and those who we remember posthumously.  That’s the living legacy of the Kennedy family.  And that is the responsibility we all welcome, as Americans, for our lifetime on this planet.

We are extraordinarily blessed to be Americans because we have the opportunity to serve in ways that so many of you have served, because we have the opportunity to touch lives in the ways that so many of you have touched lives.

God bless you all, and God bless the United States of America.

Close Transcript

Wreath Laying Ceremony in Honor of President John F. Kennedy

November 20, 2013 | 1:59 | Public Domain

President Obama and the First Lady, joined by Former President Clinton, former Secretary Clinton and members of the Kennedy family, visit Arlington National Cemetery to participate in a wreath laying ceremony in honor of the life and legacy of the late President John F. Kennedy.

Download mp4 (70MB) | mp3 (5MB)

President Obama Honors Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipients

November 20, 2013 | 44:57 | Public Domain

President Obama awards the Presidential Medal of Freedom to 16 individuals who have made especially meritorious contributions to the security or national interests of the United States, to world peace, or to cultural or other significant public or private endeavors. Established 50 years ago by President John F. Kennedy, the Presidential Medal of Freedom is our Nation's highest civilian honor.

Download mp4 (1700MB) | mp3 (108MB)

Read the Transcript

President Obama Honors Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipients

[[nid:245551]]

The Presidential Medal of Freedom, established 50 years ago by President John F. Kennedy, is our nation’s highest civilian honor. The medal has been presented to more than 500 individuals who have made especially “meritorious contributions to the security or national interests of the United States, to world peace, or to cultural or other significant public or private endeavors.”

Today, in a ceremony at the White House, President Obama added 16 names to that distinguished list. Watch the interviews with the recipients here:

Recipients of the 2013 Presidential Medal of Freedom included sports champions and scientists, musicians and civil rights leaders, activists and journalists, media moguls and public servants.

[[nid:245556]]

“These are the men and women who in their extraordinary lives remind us all of the beauty of the human spirit, the values that define us as Americans, the potential that lives inside of all of us,” President Obama said.

[[nid:245561]]

Watch video of the ceremony here or read more about each of the 2013 recipients below.


Ernie Banks
Known to many as “Mr. Cub,” Ernie Banks is one of the greatest baseball players of all time. During his 19 seasons with the Chicago Cubs, he played in 11 All-Star Games, hit over 500 home runs, and became the first National League player to win Most Valuable Player honors in back-to-back years. He was elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame in 1977, his first year of eligibility.

Ben Bradlee
Ben Bradlee is one of the most respected newsmen of his generation. During his tenure as executive editor of The Washington Post, Mr. Bradlee oversaw coverage of the Watergate scandal, successfully challenged the Federal Government over the right to publish the Pentagon Papers, and guided the newspaper through some of its most challenging moments. He also served in the Navy during World War II.

Bill Clinton
President Clinton was the 42nd President of the United States. Before taking office, he served as Governor and Attorney General of the State of Arkansas. Following his second term, President Clinton established the Clinton Foundation to improve global health, strengthen economies, promote health and wellness, and protect the environment. He also formed the Clinton-Bush Haiti Fund with President George W. Bush in 2010.

Daniel Inouye (posthumous)
Daniel Inouye was a lifelong public servant. As a young man, he fought in World War II with the 442nd Regimental Combat Team, for which he received the Medal of Honor. He was later elected to the Hawaii Territorial House of Representatives, the United States House of Representatives, and the United States Senate. Senator Inouye was the first Japanese American to serve in Congress, representing the people of Hawaii from the moment they joined the Union.

Daniel Kahneman
Daniel Kahneman is a pioneering scholar of psychology. After escaping Nazi occupation in World War II, Dr. Kahneman immigrated to Israel, where he served in the Israel Defense Forces and trained as a psychologist. Alongside Amos Tversky, he applied cognitive psychology to economic analysis, laying the foundation for a new field of research and earning the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2002. He is currently a professor at Princeton University.

Richard Lugar
Richard Lugar represented Indiana in the United States Senate for more than 30 years. An internationally respected statesman, he is best known for his bipartisan leadership and decades-long commitment to reducing the threat of nuclear weapons. Prior to serving in Congress, Senator Lugar was a Rhodes Scholar and Mayor of Indianapolis from 1968 to 1975. He currently serves as President of the Lugar Center.

Loretta Lynn
Loretta Lynn is a country music legend. Raised in rural Kentucky, she emerged as one of the first successful female country music vocalists in the early 1960s, courageously breaking barriers in an industry long dominated by men. Ms. Lynn’s numerous accolades include the Kennedy Center Honors in 2003 and the Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award in 2010.

Mario Molina
Mario Molina is a visionary chemist and environmental scientist. Born in Mexico, Dr. Molina came to America to pursue his graduate degree. He later earned the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for discovering how chlorofluorocarbons deplete the ozone layer. Dr. Molina is a professor at the University of California, San Diego; Director of the Mario Molina Center for Energy and Environment; and a member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

Sally Ride (posthumous)
Sally Ride was the first American female astronaut to travel to space. As a role model to generations of young women, she advocated passionately for science education, stood up for racial and gender equality in the classroom, and taught students from every background that there are no limits to what they can accomplish. Dr. Ride also served in several administrations as an advisor on space exploration.

Bayard Rustin (posthumous)
Bayard Rustin was an unyielding activist for civil rights, dignity, and equality for all. An advisor to the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., he promoted nonviolent resistance, participated in one of the first Freedom Rides, organized the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, and fought tirelessly for marginalized communities at home and abroad. As an openly gay African American, Mr. Rustin stood at the intersection of several of the fights for equal rights.

Arturo Sandoval
Arturo Sandoval is a celebrated jazz trumpeter, pianist, and composer. Born outside Havana, he became a protégé of jazz legend Dizzy Gillespie and gained international acclaim as a dynamic performer. He defected to the United States in 1990 and later became an American citizen. He has been awarded nine Grammy Awards and is widely considered one of the greatest living jazz artists.

Dean Smith
Dean Smith was head coach of the University of North Carolina basketball team from 1961 to 1997. In those 36 years, he earned 2 national championships, was named National Coach of the Year multiple times, and retired as the winningest men’s college basketball coach in history. Ninety-six percent of his players graduated from college. Mr. Smith has also remained a dedicated civil rights advocate throughout his career.

Gloria Steinem
Gloria Steinem is a renowned writer and activist for women’s equality. She was a leader in the women’s liberation movement, co-founded Ms. magazine, and helped launch a wide variety of groups and publications dedicated to advancing civil rights. Ms. Steinem has received dozens of awards over the course of her career, and remains an active voice for women’s rights.

Cordy Tindell “C.T.” Vivian
C.T. Vivian is a distinguished minister, author, and organizer. A leader in the Civil Rights Movement and friend to the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., he participated in Freedom Rides and sit-ins across our country. Dr. Vivian also helped found numerous civil rights organizations, including Vision, the National Anti-Klan Network, and the Center for Democratic Renewal. In 2012, he returned to serve as interim President of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.

Patricia Wald
Patricia Wald is one of the most respected appellate judges of her generation. After graduating as 1 of only 11 women in her Yale University Law School class, she became the first woman appointed to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, and served as Chief Judge from 1986-1991. She later served on the International Criminal Tribunal in The Hague. Ms. Wald currently serves on the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board.

Oprah Winfrey
Oprah Winfrey is one of the world’s most successful broadcast journalists. She is best known for creating The Oprah Winfrey Show, which became the highest rated talk show in America for 25 years. Ms. Winfrey has long been active in philanthropic causes and expanding opportunities for young women. She has received numerous awards throughout her career, including the Bob Hope Humanitarian Award in 2002 and the Kennedy Center Honors in 2010.

Close Transcript

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Readout of the President's Meeting With Representatives from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners on the Affordable Care Act

Today, the President met with representatives from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) to discuss the implementation of the Affordable Care Act and other insurance-related issues.

The President reiterated the Administration’s commitment to working in close coordination with insurance commissioners who have a critical role to play in protecting consumers, ensuring plan solvency, and promoting competitive health insurance markets.  They also help consumers understand the provisions and opportunities afforded them under the Affordable Care Act.

The President and insurance commissioners also discussed ongoing work to make sure consumers across the country understand their options and rights under the Affordable Care Act.

The President and insurance commissioners also talked about the announcement last week to help smooth the transition to the new system by providing states with the option of allowing insurers to renew existing plans in 2014, and requiring that health plans that offer such renewals provide consumers with clear information about consumer protections lacking in those plans and their options and possible tax credits through the Marketplace.  States have different populations with unique needs, and it is up to the insurance commissioner and health insurance companies to decide which insurance products can be offered to existing customers next year.

Additionally, the President emphasized that he wants to hear any ideas that insurance commissioners may have as implementation continues to ensure that Americans across the country have the information they need to get affordable, quality coverage for themselves and their families.

Meeting attendees:

  • Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services
  • Cecilia Muñoz, White House Assistant to the President and Director of the Domestic Policy Council
  • Chris Jennings, White House Deputy Assistant to the President for Health Policy and Coordinator for Health Reform
  • Kathryn Ruemmler, Assistant to the President and Counsel to the President
  • Former Sen. Ben Nelson, Chief Executive Officer, NAIC
  • Jim Donelon, Insurance Commissioner, Louisiana, and NAIC President
  • Wayne Goodwin, Insurance Commissioner, North Carolina
  • Thomas Leonardi, Insurance Commissioner, Connecticut

###

 

President Obama Honors Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipients

President Barack Obama delivers remarks and awards the 2013 Presidential Medal of Freedom to honorees during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House

President Barack Obama delivers remarks and awards the 2013 Presidential Medal of Freedom to honorees during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House, Nov. 20, 2013. Honorees are: Ernie Banks, Ben Bradlee, former President Bill Clinton, Daniel Inouye (posthumous), Daniel Kahneman, Richard Lugar, Loretta Lynn, Mario Molina, Sally Ride (posthumous), Bayard Rustin (posthumous), Arturo Sandoval, Dean Smith, Gloria Steinem, Cordy Tindell "C.T." Vivian, Patricia Wald, and Oprah Winfrey. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

The Presidential Medal of Freedom, established 50 years ago by President John F. Kennedy, is our nation’s highest civilian honor. The medal has been presented to more than 500 individuals who have made especially “meritorious contributions to the security or national interests of the United States, to world peace, or to cultural or other significant public or private endeavors.”

Today, in a ceremony at the White House, President Obama added 16 names to that distinguished list. Watch the interviews with the recipients here:

Recipients of the 2013 Presidential Medal of Freedom included sports champions and scientists, musicians and civil rights leaders, activists and journalists, media moguls and public servants.

President Barack Obama awards the 2013 Presidential Medal of Freedom to Oprah Winfrey

President Barack Obama awards the 2013 Presidential Medal of Freedom to Oprah Winfrey during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House, Nov. 20, 2013. (Official White House Photo by Lawrence Jackson)

“These are the men and women who in their extraordinary lives remind us all of the beauty of the human spirit, the values that define us as Americans, the potential that lives inside of all of us,” President Obama said.

President Barack Obama delivers awards the 2013 Presidential Medal of Freedom to Cordy Tindell “C.T.” Vivian

President Barack Obama delivers awards the 2013 Presidential Medal of Freedom to Cordy Tindell “C.T.” Vivian, during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House, Nov. 20, 2013. (Official White House Photo by Lawrence Jackson)

Watch video of the ceremony here or read more about each of the 2013 recipients below.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by the Press Secretary on Elections in Nepal

The United States congratulates the people of Nepal on their November 19 Constituent Assembly elections. These elections mark a vital step in the peace process that began in 2006.

Elections like these are a milestone not just for Nepal but for people around the world working to rebuild after conflicts and resolve disputes via constitutional and homegrown means.  The Nepali people endured years of civil war, in which innocent civilians were the victims of violent extremism and terrorism.  Since the end of the conflict, Nepal has made vital progress toward supporting civil society, promoting the participation of women and youth, and becoming a pluralistic democracy that can support the dreams and aspirations of all the Nepali people.  As Nepal’s newly elected leaders turn to the important task of concluding a constitution, the United States will continue to support Nepal’s progress along a peaceful, prosperous, inclusive, and democratic path.

 

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at Presidential Medal of Freedom Ceremony

East Room

11:17 A.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT:  Good morning!  (Applause.)  Good morning, everybody!  Everybody, please have a seat.  Have a seat.

Well, on behalf of Michelle and myself, welcome to the White House.  This is one of my favorite events every year, especially special this year, as I look at this extraordinary group of individuals and our opportunity to honor them with our nation’s highest civilian honor -- the Presidential Medal of Freedom. 

And this year, it’s just a little more special because this marks the 50th anniversary of President Kennedy establishing this award.  We’re honored, by the way, today to have with us one of my favorite people -- Ethel Kennedy -- and a pretty good basketball player, President Kennedy’s grandson, Jack.  (Applause.)  

This medal has been bestowed on more than 500 deserving people.  Tonight, I’m looking forward to joining some of these honorees, as well as members of the Kennedy family, as we pay tribute to these 50 years of excellence.  And this morning, we’re honored to add 16 new names to this distinguished list. 

Today, we salute fierce competitors who became true champions.  In the sweltering heat of a Chicago summer, Ernie Banks walked into the Cubs locker room and didn’t like what he saw.  “Everybody was sitting around, heads down, depressed,” he recalled.  So Ernie piped up and said, “Boy, what a great day!  Let’s play two!”  (Laughter.)  That’s “Mr. Cub” -- a man who came up through the Negro Leagues, making $7 a day, and became the first black player to suit up for the Cubs and one of the greatest hitters of all time.  And in the process, Ernie became known as much for his 512 home runs as for his cheer and his optimism and his eternal faith that someday the Cubs would go all the way.  (Laughter.)   

And that's serious belief.  (Laughter.)  That is something that even a White Sox fan like me can respect.  (Laughter.)  But he is just a wonderful man and a great icon of my hometown.
 
Speaking of sports, Dean Smith is one of the winningest coaches in college basketball history, but his successes go far beyond Xs and Os.  Even as he won 78 percent of his games, he graduated 96 percent of his players.  The first coach to use multiple defenses in a game, he was the pioneer who popularized the idea of “pointing to the passer” -- after a basket, players should point to the teammate who passed them the ball.  And with his first national title on the line, he did have the good sense to give the ball to a 19-year-old kid named Michael Jordan.  (Laughter.)  Although they used to joke that the only person who ever held Michael under 20 was Dean Smith.  (Laughter.)   

While Coach Smith couldn’t join us today due to an illness that he’s facing with extraordinary courage, we also honor his courage in helping to change our country -- he recruited the first black scholarship athlete to North Carolina and helped to integrate a restaurant and a neighborhood in Chapel Hill.  That's the kind of character that he represented on and off the court.

We salute innovators who pushed the limits of science, changing how we see the world -- and ourselves.  And growing up, Sally Ride read about the space program in the newspaper almost every day, and she thought this was “the coolest thing around.”  When she was a PhD candidate at Stanford she saw an ad for astronauts in the student newspaper and she seized the opportunity.  As the first American woman in space, Sally didn’t just break the stratospheric glass ceiling, she blasted through it.  And when she came back to Earth, she devoted her life to helping girls excel in fields like math, science and engineering.  “Young girls need to see role models,” she said, “you can’t be what you can’t see.”  Today, our daughters -- including Malia and Sasha -- can set their sights a little bit higher because Sally Ride showed them the way.

Now, all of us have moments when we look back and wonder, “What the heck was I thinking?”  I have that -- (laughter) -- quite a bit.  Psychologist Daniel Kahneman has made that simple question his life’s work.  In a storied career in Israel and America, he basically invented the study of human decision-making.  He’s helped us to understand everything from behavioral economics to “Does living in California make people happy?”  It’s an interesting question.  He’s also been called an expert on irrational behavior -- so I'm sure that he could shed some light on Washington.  (Laughter.) 

But what truly sets Daniel apart is his curiosity.  Guided by his belief that people are “endlessly complicated and interesting,” at 79 he’s still discovering new insights into how we think and learn, not just so we understand each other, but so we can work and live together more effectively. 

Dr. Mario Molina’s love of science started as a young boy in Mexico City, in a homemade laboratory in a bathroom at home.  And that passion for discovery led Mario to become one of the most respected chemists of his era.  He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize -- or the Nobel Prize, rather, not only for his path-breaking research, but also for his insistence that when we ignore dangerous carbon emissions we risk destroying the ozone layer and endangering our planet.  And thanks to Mario’s work, the world came together to address a common threat, and today, inspired by his example, we’re working to leave our planet safer and cleaner for future generations.

We also have to salute musicians, who bring such joy to our lives.  Loretta Lynn was 19 the first time she won the big -- she won big at the local fair.  Her canned vegetables brought home 17 blue ribbons -- (laughter) -- and made her “Canner of the Year.” (Laughter.)  Now, that’s impressive.  (Laughter.) 

For a girl from Butcher Hollow, Kentucky, that was fame.  Fortunately for all of us, she decided to try her hand at things other than canning.  Her first guitar cost $17, and with it this coal miner’s daughter gave voice to a generation, singing what no one wanted to talk about and saying what no one wanted to think about.  And now, over 50 years after she cut her first record -- and canned her first vegetables -- (laughter) -- Loretta Lynn still reigns as the rule-breaking, record-setting queen of country music. 

As a young man in Cuba, Arturo Sandoval loved jazz so much it landed him in jail.  It was the Cold War, and the only radio station where he could hear jazz was the Voice of America, which was dangerous to listen to.  But Arturo listened anyway.  Later, he defected to the United States knowing he might never see his parents or beloved homeland again.  “Without freedom,” he said, “there is no life.”  And today, Arturo is an American citizen and one of the most celebrated trumpet players in the world.  “There isn’t any place on Earth where the people don’t know about jazz,” he says, and that’s true in part because musicians like him have sacrificed so much to play it.

We salute pioneers who pushed our nation towards greater justice and equality.  A Baptist minister, C.T. Vivian was one of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s closest advisors.  “Martin taught us,” he says, “that it’s in the action that we find out who we really are.”  And time and again, Reverend Vivian was among the first to be in the action:  In 1947, joining a sit-in to integrate an Illinois restaurant; one of the first Freedom Riders; in Selma, on the courthouse steps to register blacks to vote, for which he was beaten, bloodied and jailed.  Rosa Parks said of him, “Even after things had supposedly been taken care of and we had our rights, he was still out there, inspiring the next generation, including me,” helping kids go to college with a program that would become Upward Bound.  And at 89 years old, Reverend Vivian is still out there, still in the action, pushing us closer to our founding ideals.

Now, early in the morning the day of the March on Washington, the National Mall was far from full and some in the press were beginning to wonder if the event would be a failure.  But the march’s chief organizer, Bayard Rustin, didn’t panic.  As the story goes, he looked down at a piece of paper, looked back up, and reassured reporters that everything was right on schedule.  The only thing those reporters didn’t know was that the paper he was holding was blank.  (Laughter.)  He didn’t know how it was going to work out, but Bayard had an unshakable optimism, nerves of steel, and, most importantly, a faith that if the cause is just and people are organized, nothing can stand in our way. 

So, for decades, this great leader, often at Dr. King’s side, was denied his rightful place in history because he was openly gay.  No medal can change that, but today, we honor Bayard Rustin’s memory by taking our place in his march towards true equality, no matter who we are or who we love.  (Applause.)

Speaking of game-changers, disrupters, there was a young girl names Gloria Steinem who arrived in New York to make her mark as a journalist, and magazines only wanted to write articles like “How to Cook without Really Cooking for Men.”  (Laughter.)  Gloria noticed things like that.  (Laughter.)  She’s been called a “champion noticer.”  She’s alert to all the ways, large and small, that women had been and, in some cases, continue to be treated unfairly just because they’re women. 

As a writer, a speaker, an activist, she awakened a vast and often skeptical public to problems like domestic violence, the lack of affordable child care, unfair hiring practices.  And because of her work, across America and around the world, more women are afforded the respect and opportunities that they deserve.  But she also changed how women thought about themselves.  And Gloria continues to pour her heart into teaching and mentoring.  Her one piece of advice to young girls is -- I love this -- “Do not listen to my advice.  Listen to the voice inside you and follow that.” 

When Patricia Wald’s law firm asked if she’d come back after having her first child, she said she’d like some time off to focus on her family -- devoted almost 10 years to raising five children.  But Patricia never lost the itch to practice law.  So while her husband watched the kids at home, she’d hit the library on weekends.  At the age 40, she went back to the courtroom to show the “young kids” a thing or two.  As the first female judge on the D.C. Circuit, Patricia was a top candidate for Attorney General.  After leaving the bench, her idea of retirement was to go to The Hague to preside over the trials of war criminals.  Patricia says she hopes enough women will become judges that “it’s not worth celebrating” anymore.  But today, we celebrate her.  And along with Gloria, she shows there are all kinds of paths listening to your own voice.
We salute communicators who shined a light on stories no one else was telling.  A veteran of World War II and more than a dozen Pacific battles, Ben Bradlee brought the same intensity and dedication to journalism.  Since joining The Washington Post 65 years ago, he transformed that newspaper into one of the finest in the world.  With Ben in charge, the Post published the Pentagon Papers, revealing the true history of America’s involvement in Vietnam; exposed Watergate; unleashed a new era of investigative journalism, holding America’s leaders accountable and reminding us that our freedom as a nation rests on our freedom of the press.  When Ben retired, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan put the admiration of many into a poem:  “O rare Ben Bradlee/His reign has ceased/But his nation stands/Its strength increased.”

And I also indicated to Ben he can pull off those shirts and I can't.  (Laughter.)  He always looks so cool in them.  (Laughter.) 
Early in Oprah Winfrey’s career, her bosses told her she should change her name to Susie.  (Laughter.)  I have to pause here to say I got the same advice.  (Laughter and applause.)  They didn't say I should be named "Susie," but they suggested I should change my name.  (Laughter.)  People can relate to Susie, that's what they said.  It turned out, surprisingly, that people could relate to Oprah just fine. 
In more than 4,500 episodes of her show, her message was always, "You can."  "You can do and you can be and you can grow and it can be better."  And she was living proof, rising from a childhood of poverty and abuse to the pinnacle of the entertainment universe.  But even with 40 Emmys, the distinction of being the first black female billionaire, Oprah’s greatest strength has always been her ability to help us discover the best in ourselves.  Michelle and I count ourselves among her many devoted fans and friends.  As one of those fans wrote, “I didn’t know I had a light in me until Oprah told me it was there.”  What a great gift.
And, finally, we salute public servants who’ve strengthened our nation.  Daniel Inouye was a humble man and didn’t wear his Medal of Honor very often.  Instead, he liked to wear a pin representing the Good Conduct Medal he earned as a teenage private.  “To behave yourself takes special effort,” he said,  “and I did not want to dishonor my family.”  Danny always honored his family and his country, even when his country didn’t always honor him. 
After being classified as an “enemy alien,” Danny joined a Japanese American unit that became one of the most decorated in World War II.  And as the second-longest serving senator in American history, he showed a generation of young people -- including one kid with a funny name growing up in Hawaii who noticed that there was somebody during some of those hearings in Washington that didn't look like everybody else, which meant maybe I had a chance to do something important, too.  He taught all of us that no matter what you look like or where you come from, this country has a place for everybody who’s willing to serve and work hard.
A proud Hoosier, Dick Lugar has served America for more than half a century, from a young Navy lieutenant to a respected leader in the United States Senate.  I’ll always be thankful to Dick for taking me -- a new, junior senator -- under his wing, including travels together to review some of his visionary work, the destruction of Cold War arsenals in the former Soviet Union  -- something that doesn’t get a lot of public notice, but was absolutely critical to making us safer in the wake of the Cold War.
Now, I should say, traveling with Dick you get close to unexploded landmines, mortar shells, test tubes filled with anthrax and the plague.  (Laughter.)  His legacy, though, is the thousands of missiles and bombers and submarines and warheads that no longer threaten us because of his extraordinary work.  And our nation and our world are safer because of this statesman. And in a time of unrelenting partisanship, Dick Lugar’s decency, his commitment to bipartisan problem-solving, stand as a model of what public service ought to be.  
Now, last, but never least, we honor a leader who we still remember with such extraordinary fondness.  He still remembers as a child waving goodbye to his mom -- tears in her eyes -- as she went off to nursing school so she could provide for her family.  And I think lifting up families like his own became the story of Bill Clinton’s life.  He remembered what his mom had to do on behalf of him and he wanted to make sure that he made life better and easier for so many people all across the country that were struggling in those same ways and had those same hopes and dreams.  So as a governor, he transformed education so more kids could pursue those dreams.  As President, he proved that, with the right choices, you could grow the economy, lift people out of poverty.  We could shrink our deficits and still invest in our families, our health, our schools, science, technology.  In other words, we can go farther when we look out for each other. 

And as we’ve all seen, as President, he was just getting started.  He doesn’t stop.  He’s helped lead relief efforts after the Asian tsunami, Hurricane Katrina, the Haiti earthquake.  His foundation and global initiative have helped to save or improve the lives of literally hundreds of millions of people.  And, of course, I am most grateful for his patience during the endless travels of my Secretary of State.  (Laughter.) 

So I’m grateful, Bill, as well for the advice and counsel that you’ve offered me on and off the golf course.  (Laughter.)  And most importantly, for your lifesaving work around the world, which represents what’s the very best in America.  So thank you so much, President Clinton.  (Applause.)

So these are the recipients of the 2013 Presidential Medal of Freedom.  These are the men and women who in their extraordinary lives remind us all of the beauty of the human spirit, the values that define us as Americans, the potential that lives inside of all of us.  I could not be more happy and more honored to participate in this ceremony here today.

With that, what I would like to do is invite our honorees to just sit there and let all of us stand and give you a big round of applause.  (Applause.) 

I guess we should actually give them the medals, though.  (Laughter.)  Where are my -- here we go.  Lee, you want to hit it?

MILITARY AIDE:  Presidential Medal of Freedom recipients.

Ernie Banks.  (Applause.)  With an unmatched enthusiasm for America’s pastime, Ernie Banks slugged, sprinted and smiled his way into the record books.  Known to fans as “Mr. Cub,” he played an extraordinary 19 seasons with the Chicago Cubs, during which he was named to 11 All-Star teams, hit over 500 home runs, and won back-to-back Most Valuable Player honors.  Ernie Banks was elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame in 1977, and he will forever be known as one of the finest power hitters and most dynamic players of all time.  (Applause.)  

Benjamin Crowninshield Bradlee.  (Applause.)  A titan of journalism, Benjamin Crowninshield Bradlee is one of the most respected newsmen of his generation.  After serving our nation in World War II, Ben Bradlee went on to defend liberty here at home. Testing the limits of a free press during his tenure as executive editor of The Washington Post, he oversaw coverage of the Watergate scandal and successfully challenged the federal government over the right to publish the Pentagon Papers. His passion for accuracy and unyielding pursuit of truth continue to set the standard for journalism.  (Applause.) 

The Honorable William J. Clinton.  (Applause.)  Among the finest public servants of our time, President William J. Clinton argued cases for the people of Arkansas, served his state in the Governor’s Mansion, and guided our nation into a new century.  As the 42nd President of the United States, Bill Clinton oversaw an era of challenge and change, prosperity and progress.  His work after leaving public office continues to reflect his passionate, unending commitment to improving the lives and livelihoods of people around the world.  In responding to needs both at home and abroad, and as founder of the Clinton Foundation, he has shown that through creative cooperation among women and men of goodwill, we can solve even the most intractable problems.  (Applause.) 

Irene Hirano Inouye, accepting on behalf of her husband, the Honorable Daniel K. Inouye.  (Applause.)  A true patriot and dedicated public servant, Daniel K. Inouye understood the power of leaders when united in common purpose to protect and promote the tenets we cherish as Americans.  As a member of the revered 442nd Regimental Combat Team, Daniel Inouye helped free Europe from the grasp of tyranny during World War II, for which he received the Medal of Honor.  Representing the people of Hawaii from the moment the islands joined the Union, he never lost sight of the ideals that bind us across the 50 states.  Senator Inouye’s reason and resolve helped make our country what it is today, and for that, we honor him.  (Applause.) 

Dr. Daniel Kahneman.  (Applause.)  Daniel Kahneman’s groundbreaking work earned him a Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for his research developing prospect theory.  After escaping from Nazi-occupied France as a young boy and later joining the Israel Defense Forces, Dr. Kahneman grew interested in understanding the origins of people’s beliefs.  Combining psychology and economic analysis, and working alongside Dr. Amos Tversky, Dr. Kahneman used simple experiments to demonstrate how people make decisions under uncertain circumstances, and he forever changed the way we view human judgment.  (Applause.) 

The Honorable Richard G. Lugar.  (Applause.)  Representing the State of Indiana for over three decades in the United States Senate, Richard G. Lugar put country above party and self to forge bipartisan consensus.  Throughout his time in the Senate, he offered effective solutions to our national and international problems, advocating for the control of nuclear arms and other weapons of mass destruction.  Working with Senator Sam Nunn, Richard Lugar established the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, one of our country’s most successful national security initiatives, helping to sustain American leadership and engage nations in collaboration after decades of confrontation.  He remains a strong voice on foreign policy issues, and his informed perspective will have broad influence for years to come. (Applause.) 

Loretta Lynn.  (Applause.)  Born a coal miner’s daughter, Loretta Lynn has followed a bold path to become a legend in country music.  A singer, songwriter, and author, she has written dozens of chart-topping songs, released scores of albums, and won numerous accolades.  Breaking barriers in country music and entertainment, she opened doors for women not only by winning tremendous achievements, but also by raising issues few dared to discuss.  Fearlessly telling her own stories with candor and humor, Loretta Lynn has brought a strong female voice to mainstream music, captured the emotions of women and men alike, and revealed the common truths about life as it is lived.  (Applause.)  

Dr. Mario Molina.  (Applause.)  The curiosity and creativity that inspired Mario Molina to convert his family’s bathroom into a laboratory as a child have driven him through decades of scientific research.  Born in Mexico, Dr. Molina’s passion for chemistry brought him to the United States, where his investigations of chlorofluorocarbons led to breakthroughs in our understanding of how they deplete the ozone layer.  The impact of his discoveries extends far beyond his field, affecting environmental policy and fostering international awareness, as well as earning him the 1995 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.  Today, Dr. Molina remains a global leader, continuing to study air quality, climate change, and the environment that connects us all.  (Applause.)

Tam O’Shaughnessy accepting on behalf of her life partner, Dr. Sally K. Ride.  (Applause.)  Thirty years ago, Dr. Sally K. Ride soared into space as the youngest American and first woman to wear the Stars and Stripes above Earth’s atmosphere.  As an astronaut, she sought to keep America at the forefront of space exploration.  As a role model, she fought tirelessly to inspire young people -- especially girls -- to become scientifically literate and to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and math.  At the end of her life, she became an inspiration for those battling pancreatic cancer, and for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community.  The tale of a quiet hero, Sally Ride’s story demonstrates that the sky is no limit for those who dream of reaching for the stars.  (Applause.)

Walter Naegle accepting on behalf of his partner, Bayard Rustin.  (Applause.)  Bayard Rustin was a giant in the American Civil Rights Movement.  Openly gay at a time when many had to hide who they loved, his unwavering belief that we are all equal members of a “single human family” took him from his first Freedom Ride to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights movement.  Thanks to his unparalleled skills as an organizer, progress that once seemed impossible appears, in retrospect, to have been inevitable.  Fifty years after the March on Washington he organized, America honors Bayard Rustin as one of its greatest architects for social change and a fearless advocate for its most vulnerable citizens.  (Applause.)  

Arturo Sandoval.  (Applause.)  Arturo Sandoval is one of the world’s finest jazz musicians.  Born into poverty in Cuba and held back by his government, he risked everything to share his gifts with the world -- eventually defecting with help from Dizzy Gillespie, his mentor and friend.  In the decades since, this astonishing trumpeter, pianist, and composer has inspired audiences in every corner of the world and awakened a new generation of great performers.  He remains one of the best ever to play.  (Applause.)

Linnea Smith, accepting on behalf of her husband, Dean E. Smith.  (Applause.)  Dean E. Smith spent 36 seasons taking college basketball to new heights.  As head coach at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, he led his team to 11 Final Fours, two national titles, and 879 victories, retiring as the winningest men’s college basketball coach in history.  Dean Smith brought the same commitment to supporting his players off the court.  He helped more than 96 percent of his lettermen graduate.  And in an era of deep division, he taught players to overcome bigotry with courage and compassion.  He will forever stand as one of the greatest coaches in college basketball history.  (Applause.)

Gloria Steiner.  (Applause.)  A trailblazing writer and feminist organizer, Gloria Steinem has been at the forefront of the fight for equality and social justice for more than four decades.  Instrumental to a broad range of initiatives and issues, from establishing Ms. Magazine and Take Our Daughters to Work Day, to pushing for women’s self-empowerment and an end to sex trafficking.  She has promoted lasting political and social change in America and abroad.  Through her reporting and speaking, she has shaped debates on the intersection of sex and race, brought critical problems to national attention, and forged new opportunities for women in media.  Gloria Steinem continues to move us all to take up the cause of reaching for a more just tomorrow.  (Applause.)

Reverend C.T. Vivian.  (Applause.)  Equipped only with courage and an overwhelming commitment to social justice, the Reverend C.T. Vivian was a stalwart activist on the march toward racial equality.  Whether at a lunch counter, on a Freedom Ride, or behind the bars of a prison cell, he was unafraid to take bold action in the face of fierce resistance.  By pushing change through nonviolent demonstration and advocacy, C.T. Vivian established and led numerous organizations to support underserved individuals and communities.  His legacy of combating injustice will shine as an example for generations to come.  (Applause.)

Patricia McGowan Wald.  (Applause.)  Patricia McGowan Wald made history as the first woman appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.  Rising to Chief Judge of the Court, she always strove to better understand the law and fairly apply it.  After leaving federal service, Judge Wald helped institute standards for justice and the rule of law at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in The Hague.  Hailed as a model judge, she laid a foundation for countless women within the legal profession and helped unveil the humanity within the law.  (Applause.)

Oprah G. Winfrey.  (Applause.)  Oprah G. Winfrey is a global media icon.  When she launched The Oprah Winfrey Show in 1986, there were few women -- and even fewer women of color -- with a national platform to discuss the issues and events shaping our times.  But over the 25 years that followed, Oprah Winfrey’s innate gift for tapping into our most fervent hopes and deepest fears drew millions of viewers across every background, making her show the highest-rated talk show in television history.  Off screen, Oprah Winfrey has used her influence to support underserved communities and to lift up the lives of young people -- especially young women -- around the world.  In her story, we are reminded that no dream can be deferred when we refuse to let life’s obstacles keep us down.  (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  The Medal of Freedom honorees -- please.  (Applause.) 

Well, that concludes the formal part of today’s ceremony.  I want to thank all of you for being here.  Obviously, we are deeply indebted to those who we honor here today.  And we’re going to have an opportunity to take some pictures with the honorees and their family members. 

The rest of you, I understand the food here is pretty good. (Laughter.)  So I hope you enjoy the reception, and I hope we carry away from this a reminder of what JFK understood to be the essence of the American spirit -- that it’s represented here.  And some of us may be less talented, but we all have the opportunity to serve and to open people’s hearts and minds in our smaller orbits.  So I hope everybody has been as inspired, as I have been, participating and being with these people here today.

Thank you very much, everybody.  (Applause.)

END
12:00 P.M. EST

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by NSC Spokesperson Caitlin Hayden on UK Announcement on Clean Energy

We are delighted that the United Kingdom is joining the United States in shifting public financing toward cleaner energy sources.  This is an important component of President Obama's Climate Action Plan, and we look forward to working with the UK to encourage other countries to implement similar polices.

The President’s Climate Action Plan calls for an end to U.S. support for public financing of new coal-fired power plants overseas except for plants deploying carbon capture and sequestration technologies or in the world’s poorest countries, and encourages other countries to adopt similar policies.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 11/19/2013

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room 
 
 
1:29 P.M. EST
 
 
MR. CARNEY:  Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.  Thank you for your patience.  I wanted to wait before coming out here until I could get a full read out on the President's meeting with a group of United States senators.  
 
Today, the President hosted a meeting at the White House with chairmen, ranking members and other members of the Senate Banking Committee, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Senate Armed Services Committee, and Senate Select Committee on Intelligence to discuss Iran.  The President was joined by his national security team, including Secretary of State John Kerry and National Security Advisor Susan E. Rice.  The meeting lasted approximately two hours. 
 
The President made clear that achieving a peaceful resolution that prevents Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon is profoundly in America's national security interest.  The initial six-month step of the P5-plus-1 proposal would halt progress on the Iranian nuclear program and roll it back in key respects, stopping the advance of the program for the first time in nearly a decade, and introducing unprecedented transparency into Iran's nuclear activities while we negotiate a long-term, comprehensive solution.  The President underscored that in the absence of a first step, Iran will continue to make progress on its nuclear program by increasing its enrichment capacity, continuing to grow its stockpile of enriched uranium, installing advanced centrifuges, and making progress on the plutonium track at the Arak reactor.  
 
The President noted that the relief we are considering as part of a first step would be limited, temporary and reversible, and emphasized that we will continue to enforce sanctions during the six-month period.  He dispelled the rumors that Iran would receive $40 billion or $50 billion in relief, noting that those reports are inaccurate.  
 
The President expressed his appreciation for the bipartisan congressional support for the most effective sanctions regime in history.  He reiterated that the purpose of sanctions was and remains to change Iran's calculus regarding its nuclear program. He indicated that new sanctions should not be enacted during the current negotiations, but that they would be most effective as a robust response should Iran not accept the P5-plus-1 proposal or should Iran fail to follow through on its commitments. 
 
The President is determined to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and firmly believes that it would be preferable to do so peacefully.  Therefore, he has a responsibility to pursue the ongoing diplomatic negotiations before turning to other alternatives, including military options.  With this current P5-plus-1 proposal, we have the opportunity to halt the progress of the Iranian program, roll it back in key respects, while testing whether a comprehensive resolution can be achieved.  
 
With that, I'll take your questions.  Julie. 
 
Q    Thanks, Jay.  I have a couple of questions on that meeting.  Did the President walk away from the meeting with any assurances from lawmakers about their willingness to pause sanctions for the period of time he is seeking?  
 
MR. CARNEY:  The President made the case that I just described to you.  I won't speak for senators who were there.  There was obviously a diversity of opinion represented in the room.  I would point you to public statements by Senator Corker on this issue.  And we certainly believe that with a new round of negotiations beginning in Geneva in just a couple of days that it would be appropriate for the Senate to pause before considering new sanctions to see if these negotiations can move forward and make progress.  And if there is an agreement, a first-phase agreement, obviously a lot of interested parties will want to review that agreement and assess whether or not, as we've said, it will do something that hasn't been done in a decade, which is halt progress on Iran's nuclear program and roll it back in key respects.  
 
So we are appreciative of the meeting.  And the President obviously spent a fair amount of time with these senators, because this is such an important issue and Congress has been such an important partner in helping the administration and our partners and allies construct the most comprehensive and effective sanctions regime in history.
 
Q    How does the White House view this next round of talks that starts tomorrow?  Because of how close it seemed like the P5-plus-1 and Iran got in the last round, do you view these next couple of days as the last chance for Iran to sign on to this current agreement, and if they walk away, then maybe we have to move forward on other sanctions?  Or is this perhaps the next in what will be a series of negotiations over the same plan?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, I'd say a couple of things.  One, the previous round of negotiations were constructive and progress was made.  The P5-plus-1 was unified, but Iran decided that it could not at that time make an agreement.  
 
We will see in Geneva whether or not Iran is prepared to reach an agreement with a unified P5-plus-1 that commits itself to, in a transparent way, taking steps to halt progress on its nuclear program and roll back certain important aspects of it, so that we can --
 
Q    But if they're not prepared to accept that deal over the next couple of days, do you --
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, I'm not going to get into hypotheticals. I think that what we can say is that it is important when it comes to congressional action for Congress to hold in abeyance its potential for passing new sanctions for the time when it might be most effective.  Congress has been a very strong partner with the administration in taking that kind of action and deserves credit in the effort to construct the sanctions regime, which, in turn, has led us to this situation where there may be a potential for resolving this diplomatically, where Iran, faced with the crippling effect of the sanctions, has changed its calculus, or at least appears to have changed its calculus. 
 
So that is what we are testing, and it is certainly the Commander-in-Chief's responsibility, as he leaves all options on the table, including military force, to test whether or not we can resolve this peacefully through diplomatic negotiations.  And that's what he's doing. 
 
Q    On another foreign policy front, there's a report that Hamid Karzai and John Kerry spoke today and resolved this issue of night raids in Afghanistan.  That's one of the issues that's been holding up a deal on a post-2014 troop presence there.  Can you confirm that there's been an agreement?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, what I can tell you is that you already know because we've discussed that we reached general agreement on the bilateral security agreement when Secretary Kerry was in Kabul last month.  Since then, discussions have been ongoing with the Afghans to finalize the text ahead of the loya jirga, including today between Secretary Kerry and President Karzai.  As you know, the text needs to go through the loya jirga before any agreement can be declared final.
 
So we've been -- there are ongoing negotiations or consultations.  The general agreement has been in place since last month.  I would simply say that this negotiation or this agreement is not reached until the loya jirga has passed judgment on it.  
 
Q    But did Secretary Kerry and Karzai agree on what would go in the text on the raids today?
 
MR. CARNEY:  What I can tell you is that this issue of raids has always been one that's been a subject of negotiation and conversation and consultation with the Afghans, and that the general issue of civilian casualties has, of course, been of concern, understandably, to the Afghan government and concern to the United States and to the administration, to the U.S. military, which takes extraordinary precautions to avoid civilian casualties.  So it is certainly the case that this has been a subject of discussion between the United States and Afghanistan.
 
Q    But that doesn’t really answer the question of whether there’s an agreement.
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, I think that what I can say is that there are ongoing conversations; that Secretary Kerry spoke with the President; that the general agreement was reached last month; that these conversations are continuing.  And we look forward to consideration by the loya jirga.
 
Reuters.
 
Q    Thank you, Jay.  Back on Iran.  To what extent did Israel and its concerns about an agreement come up in today’s meeting with the senators, and what did the President say about that?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, I’ve given you a pretty comprehensive readout.  What has always been the case and I think is repeated in our conversations with members of Congress and allies is that we consult very closely with Israel on all these matters regarding Iran, as well as so many others -- one; two, that there is no daylight between the United States and Israel when it comes to the objective of preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon; and three, the fact that we believe strongly that reaching an agreement, if it can be reached with Iran, that commits Iran in a first phase to halting progress on its weapons -- or its nuclear program for the first time in nearly a decade and rolling back key aspects of it is the right way to go, because as we seek to find out whether a comprehensive agreement is reachable, it is preferable to halt that progress and roll back aspects of it to the alternative, which is to potentially pursue a comprehensive agreement without any restrictions on Iranian behavior.  That, of course, would allow Iran to continue to make progress in its program, and it would forsake the potential not only for halting the progress that’s underway, but from rolling back aspects of the program, which is what this agreement, if it’s reached, envisions.
 
Q    Does the White House have a longer-term plan for keeping senators onboard with it regarding Iran so that Congress doesn’t try to start another push for more sanctions later if the White House isn’t ready?  In the longer term, not today.
 
MR. CARNEY:  Sure.  The plan is what it has always been, which is to consult closely with Congress on these matters.  Today’s meeting was part of that effort -- ongoing effort.  Congress has been an important partner in the five-year effort under this President to make clear that Iranian behavior is the issue and to gather together an international consensus behind that premise and behind the most comprehensive set of sanctions ever put in place in history.
 
So we’ll continue to work with Congress.  And what the President said and what others on his national security team have said is that we view the Congress’s best use of potential future sanctions as one where they could hold it in abeyance, essentially, and -- hold that option in abeyance and use it if Iran fails to meet its commitments or there is not an agreement with the P5-plus-1.  So we think that would be more effective.  
 
That’s the kind of conversation the President had with senators today, and this reflects the conversations that we’ve been having with lawmakers all along.  And I’m sure that as this process moves forward, depending on the course it takes, we will have similar conversations going forward.
 
Q    Okay.  And one question on health care.  Today, a respected security expert told Congress that the website puts user data at critical risk.  How worried should Americans be about their data when they’re signing up to healthcare.gov?
 
MR. CARNEY:  I appreciate the question.  And let me get to my spot here.  On the issue of security, as HHS has said, the privacy and security of consumers’ personal information are a top priority.  When consumers fill out their online marketplace applications, they can trust that the information that they are providing is protected by stringent security standards.  Security testing happens on an ongoing basis, using industry best practices to appropriately safeguard consumers’ personal information.  The healthcare.gov website has been determined to be compliant with the Federal Information Security Management Act, based on standards promulgated by the National Institutes of Standards and Technology.
 
So this is an ongoing effort.  We are -- or CMS and HHS are constantly testing the system and making sure that it is meeting the security standards that are in place.
 
Q    Are you not concerned about this testimony that says that user data is at critical risk?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, again, the story I saw also had, I think, if it’s the same individual -- and forgive me if it’s not -- but said that if -- I think he was quoted as saying, if I had to guess, then I would say this.  And the thing is the folks obviously working on the testing of the system and the security of the system aren’t guessing.  They’re testing it and ensuring that it meets the standards necessary so that the information provided by consumers is secure.
 
Let me move around.  Alexis.
 
Q    Jay, can I follow up on what Jeff asked?  As you know, Henry Chao of CMS also indicated that the back end of healthcare.gov, the part that has to interact with the insurers, is way behind in terms of writing and completing the technical part of that, to actually do the billing and to create the coverage.  I have two questions.  Is the President at all concerned that getting that far behind in that part of healthcare.gov would prevent policies from being issued on January 1 for those people who have to make their selections by December 15th?
 
MR. CARNEY:  I think what he testified to was the same as what he said on November 13th, which is that they are still building parts -- and this is a quote:  “We are still building parts of the system to calculate payment, to collect the enrollment data from all the marketplaces and to make that payment.”  That’s from testimony a week ago, or nearly a week ago.  So the breaking-news alert today is actually not breaking news, unless you sort of do that on a monthly basis -- (laughter) -- breaking this month is that news.
 
So the point is we are still in the process of building -- they are still in the process of building aspects of the site that handle back-end issues.  And I would point you to his testimony in terms of where they are in that progress.  I think he said 30 to 40 percent of it.
 
Q    But a month later, he's saying the same thing.
 
MR. CARNEY:  No, no, a week.  Six days.
 
Q    A week later he's saying the same thing.  So I'm just trying to ask, is the President concerned.  I'm not talking about -- 
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, the President -- I think that the President is of course very focused on the need to continue to make improvements to the website.  As I think some reporting has indicated, there have been noticeable improvements to the site over recent days and weeks, and we expect that to continue.  
 
He is also focused on making sure that the aspects of the system that are still in build are completed on time.  So there's work going on 24/7 to make sure that that happens.  Because our goal, as I talked about yesterday, isn't to just build a highly functioning website, but to make sure that all aspects of the system are working in a way that allows Americans who are interested in purchasing insurance on the marketplace to do so, and find that they have affordable coverage available to them, often for the first time. 
 
Q    Second question -- Jeffrey Zients is the President’s pick to succeed Gene Sperling as National Economic Council Director in January.  My question is, is the President considering making any adjustment to that assignment?  Or, if not, if Jeff is going to take over the NEC in January, who will do what he is doing now on the health care project?
 
MR. CARNEY:  The answer to the first part of the question is that Jeff Zients will be taking over for Gene Sperling at the National Economic Council in January.  And I don’t have any other personnel announcements beyond that to make.
 
Q    Can you just add -- would the President expect to find a successor manager to continue working this through into the New Year?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Sure, that’s a good question.  I just don’t have a personnel announcement to make.  
 
Yes, Jon.
 
Q    Jay, a couple quick things.  First, the President, as you know, many times said some variation of this -- we will keep this promise to the American people.  If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period.  Is that promise still operative?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Jon, the President made clear throughout the effort to pass the Affordable Care Act and throughout the period that continues to this day in which Republicans have sought to repeal it that the vast majority of the American people, those who have insurance through their employers, who have insurance through Medicare or Medicaid, will not see a change, and that includes to how their plans allow them to get access to different doctors.
 
The reality of the insurance system that we've seen over the years is that these plans change all the time.  So there are limits -- if you're building on the private-insurance-based system that the President is doing, using the model from a Republican governor of Massachusetts, as he did -- this is not a government-run insurance program -- what is the case is that, if you're purchasing insurance in the marketplace, you have a variety of options available to you from less expensive plans to more expensive, more comprehensive plans.  
 
And as is the case in insurance markets and networks all over the country, the more comprehensive plans tend to have broader networks.  So if you are looking for -- if you want coverage from your doctor, a doctor that you've seen in the past and want that, you can look and see if there’s a plan in which that doctor participates.  And that reflects the way that the private insurance system has long worked.
 
Q    So is this another promise where he needs to kind of modify?  Because that’s not what he said.  He said, if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor, period.  But you just offered -- for the vast majority and depending on which plan you keep.  
 
MR. CARNEY:  Jon, I think everybody understands how the insurance system works.  And what the President clearly talked about throughout the effort to get the Affordable Care Act passed and since, in his efforts to make sure that it is implemented -- against the constant assault by Republicans who want to repeal it and replace it with exactly nothing -- that the system is built on the existing private insurance system that we have in this country.  And that allows for a reform that for the vast majority of the people, because they get insurance like you and I do and most people in this room, through their employer or through Medicare or through Medicaid or the VA -- for there to be no change beyond the added benefits that the ACA provides to all of us. 
 
And then, if you are obviously uninsured, like 15 percent of the population, the only doctor you've been able to see is the doctor at the emergency room, and you now have, through expanded Medicaid in those states that wisely choose that option, or through tax credits that allow you to purchase affordable health care, you have a choice of doctor for the first time.  
 
If you're in the private insurance market -- again, this is building on the private insurance market -- there’s an enormous amount of churn.  If your insurance was canceled regularly, if it was changed regularly, that is part of a system that the ACA was designed in part to improve.  And what is the case is that in state after state after state, individuals have more options than they've ever had before.  They have different levels of coverage to choose from, and depending on the level of coverage they choose from, they'll likely have a broader network of doctors and specialists to be able to see. 
 
Q    Jay, if I can just get clarification on this Henry Chao testimony, you say what he said six days ago.  Today, it seems he is much more specific.  He is saying that 30 or 40 percent of this tech system that allows for the payments to go to the insurance companies has not even been built.  
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, I think they are building it, is what he said.  
 
Q    Yes.  He said, 30 to 40 --
 
MR. CARNEY:  I mean, Jon, I guess the -- 
 
Q    You're not concerned about that?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Jon, I think again, breaking news, the website is a problem.  And we have been --
 
Q    This is a whole other problem. 
 
MR. CARNEY:  -- working on it.  And I know that people who are trying to work 24/7 on the website are spending a lot of time on Capitol Hill, where they're repeating testimony that they gave six days ago, in some cases.  But the fact is, yes, we're concerned about the website.  That's why the President is focused so intently on making sure that the best possible teams are working on making improvements to it; that people are working around the clock 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to fix the problems that the website itself has experienced and to ensure that all aspects of it are functioning when they're supposed to function. 
 
And that's where we are on November -- late November in 2013.  We're focused on a troubled website that needs to be fixed.  We're focused on solutions to problems that exist, rather than an ongoing political effort to undermine the Affordable Care Act without any alternative.  And what every critic up on Capitol Hill of Obamacare never adds to the sentence or the paragraph is what he or she would do in the alternative.  
 
And that's because the alternative is a system where insurance companies, again, can deny you coverage because you have asthma or some other preexisting condition; where they can charge you double because you're a woman; where they can excise out coverage on a certain condition because you actually suffer from it; where they can give you coverage of a sort, but actually that coverage doesn’t include hospitalization, so you can be bankrupt in a minute if you get sick.  
 
That's the debate we had.  And, in many ways, while there is justifiable focus on the problems with the launch, that's the debate we're still having, because to this day Republicans have refused to offer an alternative.  And if you don't offer an alternative, then you are passively saying that you prefer the status quo.  And they ought to concede that and say they want a system where insurance companies can deny you coverage because you have a preexisting condition.  They want a system where insurers can charge you double if you’re a woman, insure one child and not the other because one’s sick and one’s healthy.  
 
That’s not what the President believes is right.  And we are still having this debate, and engaging this debate obviously is made more difficult for us because of the problems with the website.  And as the President said, that’s on us.  It shouldn’t be that way, and that’s why we’re working so hard to fix it.
 
Q    Can I just ask you if there’s anything to this report you can just knock down that interviews were faked in the Bureau of Labor Statistics surveys on the unemployment numbers.  Is there anything --
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, look, I would refer you to Census.  That story is obviously misleading.  I think a lot of people shed a lot of credibility engaging in conspiracy theories last fall about rigged jobs numbers.  I have to tell you, as somebody who’s been here for a long time, when month after month after month the jobs numbers came in and then later were revised upward, it sure didn’t feel like they were helping us.  I remember the zero-jobs month in August of ’11.  I think that’s now over 100,000 jobs created.  Imagine how you and others would have reported it had the actual number been more accurate.
 
Q    So you’ve heard nothing of any of this?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Absolutely not.
 
Q    Okay, right.  Thanks.
 
MR. CARNEY:  Brianna.
 
Q    Thanks, Jay.  On October 21st, the President cited the story of Jessica Sanford, a Washington State woman, as a success story.  She was thrilled she had checked in to getting health insurance.  She’s a court reporter who has a son with ADHD, and she was quoted a price that included a subsidy and she was very happy because she was going to be able to afford insurance.  She’s now spoken to CNN.  She cannot -- she’s found out actually that she does not qualify for a subsidy.  It was revised down once.  She now doesn’t qualify.  And she simply cannot afford the insurance.  Now, I’m wondering what the President’s message is for her, having used her as a success story, and obviously for a number of people who are in a similar situation.
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, first of all, as I know you I think included -- CNN included in its report but not in that question, is that Jessica Sanford is working with a state-based exchange and --
 
Q    And it was the state exchange who --
 
MR. CARNEY:  Right.
 
Q    -- quoted her that. 
 
MR. CARNEY:  And we’re obviously -- I saw the news coverage and don’t know whether or not the details are correct.  But I can tell you that my understanding is Washington State health officials are reaching out to Ms. Sanford to make sure she has accurate information about her options, and I’d refer you to the Washington Health Benefit Exchange for more details.  
 
And now, while that state exchange has done a lot of things right, we also know that they have recently had problems with errors in tax credit estimates, and we’re certainly as sorry as we can be that Jessica is one of the folks that has been affected by this, if that’s the case, as reported.  I think also it’s important to note, again, as the state exchange looks into her personal situation and makes sure that all the numbers are accurate when it comes to whether or not she qualifies for a credit, that Jessica --
 
Q    Are you -- do you think she may qualify for a credit?
 
MR. CARNEY:  No, I’m saying I have no idea.  I’m saying that she got --
 
Q    I guess my question is more that she’s someone who it appears now she doesn’t, and yet it’s very expensive for her, and she’s saying she cannot afford it.  
 
MR. CARNEY:  Again, I don’t know the numbers about what her income is, what the coverage cited to her is.  I know based on your --
 
Q    I mean, the President used her story.  
 
MR. CARNEY:  Absolutely, based on what she told the President and what she told the White House she had been told by the state exchange when she was initially told she would get a subsidy and therefore the coverage would be less expensive than what she’s being told now.  In either case, this is not the federal-run marketplace; this is a state-run exchange, so we don’t --
 
Q    But the concept of her being in a --
 
MR. CARNEY:  Brianna, if I could just finish my sentence for one --
 
Q    Everyone qualifies for certain subsidies.  I’m just saying if she can’t afford it and she doesn’t qualify for a subsidy, and she’s --
 
MR. CARNEY:  And what I’m saying, Brianna, is I don’t know her personal circumstances.  And it’s my understanding that Washington State health exchange officials will reach out to her to make sure that the information she’s gotten is correct because there is -- obviously there has been, with her in particular, and with other individuals in Washington State, instances of errors in the information they’d been given.  And that’s what led initially to her believing that she would get a tax credit and then to at least the current information that she won’t.
 
What I think is also noteworthy -- and I saw it in your report, or CNN’s report, so I’ll mention it now -- is that she says she’s still a supporter of the Affordable Care Act.  And the Affordable Care Act is designed to give access to millions of Americans who, like her, have never had insurance before or have been uninsured for a long time, to affordable, quality health insurance.  
 
Again, I don’t know her personal economic circumstances or what is affordable for her.  But there is no question that, again, based on your reporting and our understanding of what she’s told us before, that she did not have insurance before, was uninsured before.  So let’s --
 
Q    But she said she was a supporter of the ACA, but she also feels that she has not been served well by the ACA.  So what is -- I guess that’s the response I’m looking for.
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, what I can tell you is that, again, I don’t know her personal circumstances.  I don’t know her income level or what goes in to the calculation of whether or not she gets a tax credit.  What I can tell you is that she did not get insurance at all, she was uncovered, she was uninsured -- one of the 15 percent with zero coverage, and whether --
 
Q    And she’s saying she’ll remain uninsured now.
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, again, I don’t know her personal circumstances.  But when we’re looking at the fact that the Affordable Care Act would increase coverage in this country by tens of millions, the fact is that the status quo means that that 15 percent of the population remains uninsured, and that 15 percent grows, because that has been the case over decades now, since the last effort to reform health care in this country -- where the ranks of the uninsured have increased, where employers over years were shedding coverage, and premiums for all of us were going up.  Health care costs were skyrocketing.  And now, for the first time in 50 years, since data has been reported, health care costs are growing more slowly than ever.
 
Q    But some people, like Jessica, may just fall through the cracks?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, again, I don’t know her personal circumstance so I can’t keep guessing based on what you tell me. I can tell you that the Affordable Care Act is designed to provide affordable, quality health insurance to millions of Americans.  What I can tell you -- this doesn’t apply to Washington State -- but there’s no question, because Republican governors around the country are making actually the fiscally unwise decision, as I think was reported about one state today, not to expand Medicaid, and they are choosing --
 
Q    That’s not Washington State.
 
MR. CARNEY:  I just said in my answer, Brianna, I just said this doesn’t apply to Washington.  But there are millions of Americans across the country who are going to be denied insurance coverage because governors across the country decided for ideological reasons not to expand Medicaid to their citizens.  And that’s certainly unfortunate.  
 
And we’re working regularly with governors around the country and lawmakers around the country to make the case for why that is not the right decision for their constituents.  And you have seen Republican governors in states like Ohio and Arizona and Florida make a different choice, because they know that’s the right thing to do for their constituents, because providing people without insurance basic coverage through Medicaid is the right thing to do.
 
Let me move around.  Laura.
 
Q    What is the White House reaction to the bombing of the embassy in Beirut today?  And do you think in your opinion it has anything to do with the conflict in Syria?
 
MR. CARNEY:  The United States strongly condemns today's terrorist bombings in Beirut, which occurred near the Iranian embassy.  We extend our condolences to the victims of this tragic event and to their families.  We call on all parties to exercise calm and restraint to avoid enflaming the situation further. 
 
We support the government of Lebanon's commitment to conduct a thorough investigation into this attack.  We look to all parties to cooperate with the investigation, and urge that those responsible are brought to justice.  Acts of terror only reinforce our determination to work with the institutions of the Lebanese state, including the Lebanese armed forces and the internal security forces, to ensure a stable, sovereign and secure Lebanon.
 
In terms of the purpose of the attack and those responsible, we've seen reported claims, but obviously we're making, as others are making, early assessments.  
 
Q    But in this part of the world, people are saying that it's a direct consequence of what's happening in Syria.  And now that Lebanon is completely --
 
MR. CARNEY:  That’s a judgment that goes to claims of responsibility, and we cannot at this time, this early stage, independently confirm who is responsible.  And until we can do that, it's hard to make a judgment about what the implications of the attack are.
 
Q    Jay, I wanted to ask you first about Afghanistan and follow up on Julie.  There's a Reuters report saying that Hamid Karzai's spokesman is claiming that President Obama is going to write a letter to the Afghan people acknowledging mistakes made in the war on terror.  Can you rule that out, or -- 
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, what I can tell you is that we don’t comment on presidential correspondence and I don’t have any specifics on any language of a letter that hasn't been written.
 
More broadly, I would reiterate that we take every precaution to prevent civilian casualties and we always express regret when civilians are killed.  This is not a new issue in our relationship.  It's one we've discussed openly in the past, and it's one we continue to work through.
 
I think it is notable that our concern about potential civilian casualties is reflected in the extreme care taken by our military forces in Afghanistan, and that continues to be the case.  And when there have been civilian casualties that have been verified, the military and the administration, the government of the United States has always regretted that and made clear that regret.  
 
Q    Health care -- on Brianna's questions about Jessica Sanford, you repeatedly said you don’t know the details, so if you don’t know the details, how could the President of the United States go out there and hold her up as a success story without someone here at the White House checking out to see how she would be impacted in Washington State?
 
MR. CARNEY:  She contacted the White House, said what her circumstances were --
 
Q    But no one checked that out and said, well, actually you'll pay more -- 
 
MR. CARNEY:  But, Ed, my understanding is that that is what she believed her situation was at the time that she wrote to the White House and that she participated in this event.  Again, if you look at CNN's report -- and I can't -- I'm saying I can't independently verify it, I'm not doubting CNN's report -- but that she was then notified that there were errors in the calculation of the tax credit that reduced her credit and then told her that she got no credit.  That’s something that the Washington State exchange does.  
 
What I can tell you is that at the time, she believed she was getting a tax credit that would make insurance affordable -- or more affordable for her.  And I think it's important to remember -- again, very important to remember -- and I would encourage you, Ed, when you do this story, to focus on this -- that she was uninsured and is uninsured, and that the status quo ante for her and for 15 percent of the population is no insurance.  It's going to the emergency room, so that everybody in this room and everybody around the country foots the bill.  And that's bad for her and her family, bad for everyone of that 15 percent, and bad for our economy and bad for every one of us who has to bear the cost of that system. 
 
Q    The McKinsey & Company report that was done I believe back in March suggesting there might be problems with the website -- I'm going to give you a chance -- I haven't heard you asked about it yet, in general, and I understand you've been upset before about some of the documents Republican Darrell Issa has put out there, so I want to make clear they're being put out by a Republican -- if you want to respond, great.  But specifically, I want to know, as you answer that, was the President briefed on that report?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Here's what I can tell you.  As we have said many times now -- I, myself, many times, and others -- and this has been frequently reported, flags were raised throughout the development of the website, as would be the case for any IT project of this size and complexity.  Those issues, including the ones from six months before the launch, were, in turn, taken up by the development team housed at CMS.  But nobody anticipated the size and scope of the problems we experienced once the site was launched, as we've discussed repeatedly. 
 
Since that time, experts have been working night and day to get it functioning.  And that is where our focus is and should be right now.  
 
The review that you cite and that has been reported on took place in the spring of 2013 and involved an outside management consulting firm.  It was a qualitative review based on interviews with project stakeholders within the government and reviews of relevant planning documents.  The purpose of the review was to describe how consumers would use the FFM -- the marketplaces, the federal marketplaces -- identify risks that could affect the consumer experience and provide strategies to mitigate those risks.  The review was not a technical review of the website's functionality. 
 
The review recommended certain proactive steps to mitigate risks and those recommendations were acted upon.  CMS, HHS has a rundown, but a few examples include:  one, establishing a streamlined decision-making process to address critical path issues as they arose, a suggestion which was implemented by the summer.  CMS also created a centralized interagency governance process to support efficient decision-making around operations.
 
Two, requirements for the website should be finalized promptly.  That recommendation was accepted and the website requirements were finalized in short order.  And then, three, to address concerns raised in the review about states' preparedness, CMS developed and communicated new milestones and deadlines to state-based marketplaces. 
 
Q    So the President was not briefed on it?
MR. CARNEY:  What I can tell you is that, as you might expect, McKinsey -- which was the firm, the outside firm that was contracted -- provided a briefing on the review and recommendations for senior officials at HHS, CMS and the White House.  To ensure that the recommendations were being addressed, these officials were subsequently briefed on actions being taken to mitigate the risks identified in the review.  The President received regular briefings on various aspects of implementing the ACA, including the recommendations from this review and the steps that CMS, HHS and others had taken to address those recommendations. 
 
Q    So officials from the White House were briefed?
 
MR. CARNEY:  A variety of officials involved in the effort. 
 
Q    And then it did make it up to the President, you're saying?
 
MR. CARNEY:  The President was briefed regularly on aspects of implementing the ACA, including the recommendations from this review and the steps that CMS and HHS were taking in response to those recommendations.
 
Q    So this now suggests that as early as March, all the way up to the President, they at least knew there were problems. Why wasn't that followed up on, then?  It was suggested.
 
MR. CARNEY:  They were followed up on.  That's what I just said, that --  
 
Q    How?  The website turned out to be a disaster.
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, Ed, again because we're in the breaking news business, it turns out that today we've learned the website did not launch effectively. 
 
Q    But here we have the President was briefed as early as March, and yet we still had this, as you call it "breaking news" that the website is a disaster.  How did nobody fix it between March and --
 
MR. CARNEY:  The review, if you carefully look at it, made observations based on the interviews about problems that needed to be fixed.  It made recommendations that HHS and CMS adopted to improve the site. 
 
Q    But did the President follow up and say, have these changes been made, I was briefed in March? 
 
MR. CARNEY:  Absolutely.  The President -- Ed. 
 
Q    Yes, so he did follow up?
 
MR. CARNEY:  The President, as we've said repeatedly, got regular briefings and was told that there were problems that were being addressed, and that upon launch, as I've said -- and I can point you to the transcripts -- there would be glitches, there would be problems, but that certainly we never expected -- he was certainly not told and nobody here was told, because there was not this expectation that the site would perform as poorly as it did.  And as he said to you last week, had he known that, he wouldn’t have been touting the launch of the website, as he and I and others were in the run-up to October 1st.
 
Q    What's the rationale to the American public about boots on the ground in Afghanistan until 2024?  As a couple of these draft proposals between the United States and Afghanistan, a U.S. military presence in Afghanistan could be there until 2024.  What do you tell the American public?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, let's be clear.  The war in Afghanistan will end next year, as the President has promised.  The combat mission will be over.  
 
What we have said for a long time now, coming out of Lisbon and the consultations with our NATO allies, is that we would potentially come to an agreement with Afghanistan to engage in counterterrorist operations and the training of Afghan troops, a very limited arrangement that would not have, as the President said in his speech, would not see American troops patrolling cities or mountains.  It would be a very limited mission to assist Afghanistan in its counterterrorism operations and to assist in the training and equipping of Afghan troops. 
 
That has been something that we've been discussing now for quite some time.  The conversations that we've been having with the Afghan government around the bilateral security agreement have focused in part on these issues.  And if an agreement is reached and it is approved, we would certainly look at what limited troop presence might be required to fulfill that mission -- counterterrorism and training and equipping of Afghan troops.  
That is not the war that we've been engaged in now for more than a decade. 
 
Q    But you get the weariness that's out there.  I mean, the idea that troops are in harm's way and -- 
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, but we've discussed -- remember, we talked about there was -- 
 
Q    You talked about this -- your option before.
 
MR. CARNEY:  Right.  And what we've made clear is that every option was on the table and we are still in the process of reaching a final agreement here.  But that agreement has to be acceptable to the United States for -- 
 
Q    But you get that the public looks at this and just sits there and goes, I don’t want to -- do you think the public -- 
 
MR. CARNEY:  I think that when it comes to this President keeping his word and ending the war in Iraq, keeping his word and winding down and ending the war in Afghanistan, the public knows that he's keeping those commitments.  
 
And we have been very clear since the NATO conference in Lisbon that there was the possibility of a small number of troops being focused on continued counterterrorism and training and equipping of Afghan forces, but that the combat mission, the war would end.  You will not see U.S. troops patrolling mountains or cities in that circumstance, if an agreement is reached.  
 
Q    Do you think it's going to be more difficult to get the public to accept something like this now just given the weariness on -- 
 
MR. CARNEY:  Again, I think that we have a dramatically reduced number of U.S. forces in harm's way than when this President took office.  There are still men and women on the front lines in Afghanistan, and this President is very focused on making sure that the mission that he outlined with his national security team around our Afghanistan presence be the focus of their efforts and be acted on by our troops as we wind down the war in Afghanistan, in keeping with his commitment.
 
Q    Quickly on health care -- is it fair to say that, given that there's -- let me put it this way -- can you confirm the reports that you're looking for other ways to deal with subsidies to insurance companies where the public, if they're eligible for subsidies they can bypass the website as -- is that definitely going to happen?
 
MR. CARNEY:  You're talking about what's been defined as direct enrollment.  As I said yesterday, and we've been saying and has reported for some time, direct enrollment has always been part of -- 
 
Q    But usually with the subsidies, the assumption has been you still have to go through the website.  
 
MR. CARNEY:  There is no way to receive a tax credit without the website and the hub.  
 
Q    And you're still not -- you're not looking for an alternative way?  Or are you -- 
 
MR. CARNEY:  We're not looking -- we're simply looking to improve the avenues available that have been in existence from the beginning.  And we are working with insurance companies to make that possible avenue where you can direct enroll -- i.e. you make a decision, perhaps after shopping online and getting a general sense of what the options are available to you, and then deciding I want to go with this particular insurance company and this plan, and then going to that insurer and saying this is what I want to do.  
 
In order to get your tax credit, you still -- either the insurer on your behalf or you have to go through the hub.  That still has to be done -- unless you want to directly enroll with a qualified plan and not even find out whether you're eligible for a subsidy.  Perhaps your income is too high and you know you're not, so you might have decided I want this plan from this insurer, and you can go direct to that insurer and purchase that plan, that qualified plan without any interaction with the website.
 
Q    Given the testimony on the Hill today about this issue, about being able to process payments to insurance companies, is it -- so the website on November 30th is not going to be able to do that?  Is that why you would -- are all of these connected?
 
MR. CARNEY:  I didn’t follow all of the testimony.  I would refer you to CMS and to the testimony about the progress in --
 
Q    Is that why you're looking for -- but there isn't going to be an alternative way?  If the website can't process subsidy payments to insurance companies, then how are you going to -- 
 
MR. CARNEY:  That’s an "if" that I don’t know the answer -- whether that’s the case, so I would refer you to the briefings at CMS about that.  
 
What I can tell you is that Mr. Chao testified, as I understand it, today, to what he testified last week, which is that there is still a portion of the site that is being built.
 
Q    It has to do with the -- this portion.
 
MR. CARNEY:  The back end --
 
Q    Yes.
 
MR. CARNEY:  -- so that the enrollment part, with which we've had trouble is the one that has been -- that was launched and that is now undergoing substantial improvements.  So in terms of the technical side of what that end of the website looks like, I'd refer you to CMS.
 
Q    But can you say that’s a working -- this website is not working if you can't process subsidy payments, is it?  I mean, at that point, what's the point of the website if --- the whole point of it is to find out if you're eligible for these subsidies -- 
 
MR. CARNEY:  But as I understand it -- and I would refer you to CMS for more details -- they have a time by which that needs to be built and they're in the process of that build.
 
Q    They still think they're going to make it there?
 
MR. CARNEY:  I would refer you to them.  Again, he --
 
Q    You guys haven't gotten this assured then. 
 
MR. CARNEY:  I'm not saying that.  I'm just saying I haven't asked that question -- since the man testified in public today, I think I would refer you to his public testimony.
 
Major.
 
Q    Let me just put three pieces of information together, this -- 
 
MR. CARNEY:  Are they related?  (Laughter.)  
 
Q    Yes, they're very much related, which you'll see in a moment.  Chao's testimony today that you had this problem with this back-end part of the site needs to be finished.  Jessica Sanford's story, which was -- she was well-intentioned, the White House was probably well-intentioned, but there was a bug in the system, she got bad data.  And in the Post this morning -- I'm not going to ask you about the other data about the President's credibility -- but there's 71 percent of that poll say -- so that’s Republicans and Democrats and independents -- that the enrollment deadline should be extended just because these problems have proved, at least to the public’s satisfaction, and because these other pieces of data suggest this isn’t going to be ready and doable on the timeline originally envisioned. 
 
Isn’t pressure -- not just practical pressure, but now political pressure -- going to build on this White House to give serious consideration to extending the enrollment deadline so people can actually avail themselves of the Affordable Care Act as originally envisioned, because the original timeline is now simply not workable?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, we’re working under a timeline where we expect improvements to the website to have been put in place that will allow it to function effectively for the vast majority of users by the end of this month, by December 1st.  And in the meantime, as has been reported, people are enrolling.  And the improvements -- this is not a jump up at the end of the month, this is a steady rise in improvements.  Those improvements have led to a more effective website and to improved enrollment, as we sort of roughly understand.  Obviously we’ll have data to release monthly when it’s available.
 
But our focus is on fixing the website and getting it working, making sure that Americans are able to enroll either online or in person or through call centers, so that those who want to buy insurance and have it kick in on January 1st are able to do that.  We are being very transparent about where we are in this process, about all the problems that we’ve had, about the software and hardware fixes that are being made, about the fact that there are elements of it that are still being built --
 
Q    And isn’t it possible that all these efforts may fall short and you may need to reconsider this issue?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, I mean, you’re asking me a hypothetical.  What I’m saying is where we are today --
 
Q    It’s not exactly a hypothetical because the problems that you’re dealing with are real, and we’re trying to measure them and you’re trying to deal with them.  That’s not a hypothetical.
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, no, but we’re on track, we believe, to hit our mark of making the website functionality such that the vast majority of users will be able to navigate it successfully. And there will obviously be those users who might still have problems with it that are related to technology.  They might still have -- they might choose not to go through that website because of the complexity of their situation or a general predisposition against making big purchases online.  I mean, these are always things that you have to take into consideration, and that’s why there are other methods by which people can enroll and shop.
 
So we’re going to -- we provide these regular briefings at CMS.  I get out here and answer questions about this, and others do.  And we’ll keep you apprised of our progress.  We believe it’s very important that the promise of the Affordable Care Act be fulfilled, and the promise is that millions of Americans will be able to --
 
Q    Can’t it be fulfilled even if you extend the enrollment?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, but what I’m saying is we’re focused on what we’re doing to improve the website and what we’re doing to get as many people enrolled as possible who want to be enrolled. And I have no new information to provide about the current deadlines except that we’re working to meet them.
 
Q    Okay.  Senator Corker told us outside after the meeting that the senators came away with a much greater sense of the details of the negotiations.  Is it fair to say the President and the Secretary of State conveyed more to them about what’s on the actual negotiating table than has been discussed publicly?
 
MR. CARNEY:  I think it’s fair to say that.  It’s a two-hour meeting.  So, yes.
 
Q    Okay.  And was there a general meeting of the minds on the timeline?  It’s clear now that there’s not going to be an amendment to the defense authorization bill on this topic until after the Senate comes back from the Thanksgiving recess.  Clearly this is a very important week for the negotiations.  So do you feel you have reached a sort of meeting of the minds that this is not going to complicate conversations with the Iranians and the P5-plus-1?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, I defer to the Senate and to the senators who were in the meeting.  I did note the public comments of Senator Corker with regards to these specific issues, and we certainly appreciate that.  It reflects the President’s view that it would not be productive for Congress to act on new sanctions now because they should retain that potential for later, if necessary, to positively affect Iranian behavior.
 
Right now, we are where we are with the upcoming sessions in Geneva because of the sanctions regime that’s been in place and the potential that Iran has decided -- or rather changed its calculus about how it views its nuclear program.
 
Q    One thing that will come up before the Senate in the coming days on the defense authorization bill is the question of rewriting the military rules on sexual assault.  The President has spoken about this forcefully on a couple of occasions.  And there was a lengthy statement of administration policy last night, and I may have missed it -- I tried to read it carefully 
-- but where does the administration come down on the McCaskill versus Gillibrand amendment on how to deal with the accountability of commanders or a completely independent review that takes commanders out of the decision-making process on military sexual assault allegations?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, thank you for the question.  The statement of administration policy, as I understand it, was on the underlying bill, not on any potential amendments.
 
Q    I figured as much.  I just wanted to clarify.
 
MR. CARNEY:  So on the issue of sexual assault in the military, the President does feel very strongly, as you know, having heard him discuss this.  And we have been working with members of Congress on this issue.  It is something, as I said, the President is very concerned about, and that’s why he has directed Secretary Hagel and the rest of his team to address this issue aggressively to make sure that victims are being helped and that perpetrators are being held accountable.  
 
But we’re continuing to work with members of Congress.  Beyond the statement of administration policy on the underlying bill, I don’t have any more insight on potential amendments at this time.  What I can tell you is that we consider this to be a very important issue.
 
Q    So there is no position one way or the other on which is better, McCaskill or Gillibrand?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Beyond what we put out on the underlying defense authorization bill, I can only tell you that we’re working with members of Congress who are very concerned about this issue, as the President is.
 
Q    Now, you may not know the answer to this, but I want to bring this up to you.  As you -- I know you know this, but the President is one of 61 famous politicians, historians and others who have cited the Gettysburg Address for Ken Burns.
 
MR. CARNEY:  Yes.
 
Q    Now, there are two copies of that Gettysburg Address.  One is called the Nicolay and one is called the Hay, and both are in the Library of Congress.  Neither of them include “under God,” which is the way the President read it.  Many others included a reference to God in the Gettysburg Address.  I’m just curious if you know why the President read it that way?
 
MR. CARNEY:  I think he read the version of the address that Ken Burns provided.  I think Ken Burns is a noted Civil War scholar.
 
Q    Ken Burns provided it to him?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Yes, that’s my understanding -- the Nicolay version, yes.
 
Q    Just wanted to clarify.
 
Q    Jay, would the President like to see a technical-fix bill to the health law pass Congress?  And does last week’s executive action suggest that the White House believes it’s politically impossible right now?
 
MR. CARNEY:  A technical fix on the issue of cancellations? 
 
Q    Or all kinds of -- the language -- all sorts of health experts say -- 
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, the President is -- that’s a very good question.  The President has long said that he would welcome efforts by lawmakers of both parties that are sincere that are aimed at making improvements to the Affordable Care Act so that it more effectively delivers on its promise.  And that’s how we view potential legislative action on this issue and on any issue.
 
What has certainly been the case thus far is that Republicans have, regrettably, even when, at least superficially, devising legislation to make improvements to the Affordable Care Act, have in conferences and even in public acknowledged that what they’re really engaging in is, as I think John Boehner said, targeted strikes aimed at torpedoing the whole Affordable Care Act.
 
And I mean, that’s -- we just have a difference of opinion about the underlying necessity of reforming our health care system.  And we had a long campaign about this.  We’ve had a Supreme Court decision about this.  And what remains true today is that those who want to do away with the Affordable Care Act are offering no alternative in its place.  And in fact, any suggestion that we’ve seen in the House that Republicans should put forward a real reform alternative have been savaged by the most vocal and arguably powerful element of the Republican Party.  
So what that leaves us with is trying to find those who want to engage in good-faith efforts to make legislative fixes that improve the bill.  And perhaps there will be some in the Republican Party, as there are, of course, in the Democratic Party.  In the meantime, we do what we can administratively to make the fixes that will help improve it, and we continue to have the broader debate about, even with a faulty website and with some of the other problems with enrollment, do we continue to implement the Affordable Care Act so that millions of Americans have access to quality health insurance, many for the first time, or do we go back to the past where insurance companies dictated whether or not if you had a sister -- twin sister with exactly the same health, she was going to have to pay double for the same policy.  
 
We have very strong opinions about that debate, and have been engaged in it for years now, and it seems like we’ll be engaged in it now for some time into the future.
 
Mark.
 
Q    Jay, back to Iran.
 
MR. CARNEY:  And then April.
 
Q    The U.S. has always said through the course of these Iran negotiations that it shares intel with the Israelis, consults with the Israelis, sends officials to Jerusalem to brief the Israelis on the results of whatever round of negotiations has just finished.  And yet here we are at a moment where there’s this chasm of misunderstanding and disagreement between the U.S. and Israel on the wisdom of doing an interim deal, and Israeli officials have gone so far as to say they feel misled by the United States about the nature of this deal or possible deal.
 
I’m wondering what, in your view, accounts for this gulf between two close allies.  Is the President worried that this has eroded trust in a way that may be hard to put together again?  And then lastly, is there a concern that the ill will over this, the misunderstanding over this could bleed over into some of the President’s other priorities in the region, notably a peace deal between the Israelis and the Palestinians?
 
MR. CARNEY:  On our consultations with Israel over Iran, they are constant and broad.  And in all cases, they start from the firm understanding by both sides that we share same goal -- to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.  
 
And we have provided our Israeli counterparts significant information about the potential first-phase agreement, as well as what that would mean in terms of halting progress of the Iranian program and rolling back aspects of it, while the P5-plus-1 and Iran pursue the potential for a comprehensive agreement.  And we've made clear our view that it is in our and Israel's and all of our partners' best interest to reach a preliminary agreement that halts that progress and reverses aspects of it, rather than reach no preliminary agreement and continue to engage in potential comprehensive deal negotiations while Iran has no restrictions on its ability to pursue progress in its program.  This is, in our view, very significant.
 
Now, the relief that’s envisioned as part of this first phase is limited, it is reversible, and it leaves in place the comprehensive sanctions regime.  In fact, sanctions continue to take effect and continue to be implemented throughout that period so that Iran continues to suffer from the sanctions regime up and until it can verifiably demonstrate to the international community that it is meeting its obligations and forsaking its nuclear weapons ambitions.  
 
So we are having those discussions with all of our partners, including Israel.  What is also a bedrock principle to every conversation we have is our unshakeable commitment to Israel's security -- a commitment that has been demonstrated by this President in concrete terms throughout his five years in office, a fact that has been recognized by the Prime Minister and other top Israeli officials over these years.
 
So having said all of that, it is absolutely understandable that Israel is skeptical of Iranian behavior.  We all are, and have been.  After all, that’s why we're here.  That’s why we're in the situation that we're in.  That’s why the world has come together and punished Iran through the comprehensive sanctions regime.  But as I said earlier, it is the President's view that the sanctions weren't put in place for the sake merely of sanctioning of Iran.  They were put in place to see if we could change Iranian behavior, if we could change Tehran's calculus.  
 
And we are now at a point where it is possible that the effect of the sanctions has been to bring about a change in behavior.  We need to test it and see if that’s possible, because it is incumbent upon the President of the United States to explore the possibility of resolving this issue diplomatically before trying to resolve it through other means, including military force.
 
Q    In this case, it appears the Israelis are more skeptical of our behavior than the Iranians behavior.  They're deeply skeptical of -- 
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, I certainly doubt that.
 
Q    They're deeply skeptical, though, of the assumptions we're making in pursuing this deal and the likely outcome of that deal.  And I guess my question is, how can there be such a gulf of misunderstanding after all the consultation that you described?
 
MR. CARNEY:  What I can tell you is that we're in regular consultation with the Israelis and others.  The P5-plus-1 are unified.  The deal envisioned, if it is reached, will I think upon inspection demonstrate that there is a transparency involved that will ensure Iranian compliance; that halting progress on its program is very much a desirable outcome to a first stage of this agreement; that rolling back key aspects of it is very much a desirable outcome because it allows for essentially a pause in that progress while we explore the possibility of a comprehensive agreement with Tehran, with the P5-plus-1. 
 
So we're consulting with Congress.  We're consulting with our allies and partners.  We will see if an agreement can be reached in this first phase.  And then, obviously we will, if it is reached, be able to judge the details of it -- we, I mean collectively -- and then its implementation, including whether or not the relief that might be provided is, in fact, as we've said it is, limited and reversible, and whether or not Iran is complying, and that we have mechanisms in place to make sure that we can verify their compliance. 
 
Q    And one last thing -- spillover effect on the Israeli-Palestinian process?  Any concern about that?
 
MR. CARNEY:  I mean, these are both extremely challenging issues and have been for years, and we continue to work very closely with the Israelis and the Palestinians on an effort to make progress in what is a difficult, difficult problem.  If these challenges were easily resolved, I'm sure they would have been resolved before we got here.  And this President, this Secretary of State, the whole team is committed to pursuing U.S. national security interests, including our unshakeable commitment to Israel's defense in both cases. 
 
April. 
 
Q    Jay, going back to the ACA website, Congressman Elijah Cummings, a friend of the President, said that the reason why the President's poll numbers are down is simply because of a website. He said, once that comes up, everything will be fine.  But he said, in the meantime, what was really telling was the fact that when the President was standing here at the last press conference saying that his staff did not tell him -- and what do you say to Congressman Cummings, who says that there needs to be a shakeup within this administration because of such a major failure of the website?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, there's no question the website has performed miserably upon launch, and that is why the President was none too happy about it and has made sure that teams are in place making improvements every day.  That's not quite what the President said.  He said that he was not told of any information that would suggest the website was going to perform as badly as it did.  I think that is evident by all of the actions we took publicly in the run-up to the website, the website launch. 
 
When it comes to personnel matters, the President is focused on making sure everyone involved in this effort is working 24/7 to fix the problems, and fixing the problems not so that we can have a better functioning website as if that were the only goal  -- the goal is to fix the problems so that we can make affordable, quality health insurance available to as many Americans as possible.  So that's what we're focused on.  I got this question yesterday.  I mean, I think that the time for solving problems is now, and that's what we're focused on doing. 
 
Q    But this is a friend of the President's, a major voice on Capitol Hill in his own party.  Are you listening?
 
MR. CARNEY:  We always listen to Chairman Cummings.  And I'm not aware of the specific comments that you're referring to, but I would simply say that he and others in Congress who are strong supporters of Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act share in the President's frustration and want as much as he does that the problems are fixed so that the promise of the Affordable Care Act can be realized. 
 
Q    And on another subject really fast, another subject -- the President was very vocal with the Trayvon Martin death.  George Zimmerman has been given -- his bond has been set at $9,000.  He has to wear an electronic monitoring device.  He can't leave the state for a domestic violence situation.  Was the President aware of this yesterday, and what has he said about this, since he was so vocal before?  And granted, each situation has nothing to do with each other, but this person has a pattern, it seems, of trouble with guns.
 
MR. CARNEY:  I haven't had a discussion with him about that. And in terms of that specific incident, it's obviously one being handled by local law enforcement.
 
Roger.
 
Q    Thanks.  Secretary Sebelius -- is she still taking part in the daily briefings at the White House on the health care fix?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Secretary Sebelius is very much a part of the team.  I'm not sure that there are daily briefings involving the Secretary or have ever been daily briefings here at the White House.  The Secretary is very much involved in the effort, though.
 
Q    All right.  Is she overseeing the fixes that are going on?  Or is Zients sort of -- 
 
MR. CARNEY:  She's the Secretary of HHS, of which CMS is a component.  Jeff Zients was brought in to manage that effort, but he is doing so for CMS, and therefore for HHS.
 
Q    She's still overseeing, then?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Absolutely.  
 
John, and then I've got to go.  
 
Q    No sooner than they got back from the White House, some senators released a statement, actually a letter to Secretary Kerry, on Iran, and they basically said sanctions on Iran should not be rolled back unless the Iranian nuclear program is rolled back rather than being frozen.  Just wondering, is it viable to make a deal with the Iranians when Senators Menendez, the Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, Senator Schumer -- another ally of the President's -- are saying that it's not? 
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, again, I haven't seen, since I've been here, the statement that you mentioned.  But the fact is the first phase does envision rolling back as well as halting progress, halting progress and rolling back key aspects.  And we've talked about some of those aspects, including its enrichment capacity, its stockpile of enriched uranium, its ability to install advanced centrifuges, and the plutonium track at the Iraq reactor.  So these are areas that are very concrete and significant.  So when we talk about halting progress and rolling back, this would, if it comes to pass, be a very serious substantive agreement.  
 
Also, as I mentioned earlier, the proposal we're discussing here does not roll back sanctions.  It provides -- in fact, it explicitly leaves in place the sanctions regime and the structure that has upheld the sanctions regime.  It provides limited temporary relief on a scale that is significantly lower than has been reported, and only in return for verifiable compliance with the obligations that Iran would make, should an agreement be reached.
 
So again, this is an administration that led the way to building the most effective, comprehensive and crippling set of sanctions in history precisely to test whether or not Iranian behavior could be changed through those sanctions.  We are now at the point of seeing whether or not that can happen.  
 
Our only interest in this is in resolving the fundamental question that is preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. It is far preferable to do that peacefully than to do it through other means, including military force.  But at no point in this process has the President ever said he removes any option from the table.  But it is his obligation as President and Commander-in-Chief to at least test whether or not there is a resolution available here that is verifiable and transparent, and that could reassure the international community -- the United States, Israel, and all of our allies and partners, and every country in the region -- that Iran has forsaken its nuclear weapons ambition.  And that’s what we’re testing.  
 
If Iran does not agree, if Iran does not comply, we will retain the capacity to reverse the limited relief that a first phase would provide and to increase sanctions.  That is explicitly what we have been discussing with Congress -- that they should retain for maximum leverage the possibility of leveling new sanctions should they be necessary to respond to Iranian behavior.  Right now, we’re in the process of testing whether or not the opening that Iran has indicated is real.
 
Q    So no concern about the viability to deal with Iran if senators are not on board with --
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, again, I think we had a very good discussion here at the White House.  We heard a diversity of views.  The Senate has, at least based on comments that were cited to me, indicated what it might do at least in the near term in terms of this issue.  And in the meantime, we have negotiators headed to Geneva where they will test whether or not Tehran is serious, whether or not there is a potential here for resolving this peacefully.  And if we are able to reach a first phase agreement then we can evaluate with some level of specificity what relief is provided, whether, as we said it would be, it is temporary and limited and reversible, and what concrete, verifiable actions Iran would have to take in order to meet its commitments.
 
Thanks, everybody.
 
END    
 
2:40 P.M. EST