The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by the President on the 15th Anniversary of the Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania

Today marks the 15th anniversary of al-Qaeda’s terrorist attacks against the U.S. Embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, which killed innocent Americans and Africans.  On this day, we honor the families of the twelve Americans who lost their lives, and we join with the people and governments of Kenya and Tanzania honoring the sacrifices of the African victims of this heinous act, which killed over 200 and wounded over 5,000. 

Last month, I was honored to pay tribute to those who lost their lives, and to meet with some of the survivors, at a memorial to the fallen in Dar es Salaam.  The United States is steadfast in our commitment to protect the American men and women who dutifully serve our nation overseas, and we will remain resolute in working with our partners to combat violent extremism  in East Africa, across the region, and around the world.  We continue to stand with our East African partners to bring terrorists to justice and will carry on our efforts to prevent these attacks in the future.  On this day of remembrance, we extend our deepest thoughts and prayers to the families of those killed and wounded in the 1998 attack, and we join with our friends and partners in East Africa and around the globe in honoring their memory by building a safer, more secure, and more prosperous world.  

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Interview of the President by Jay Leno, The Tonight Show

NBC Studios
Burbank, California

4:34 P.M. PDT

Q    Welcome the President of the United States -- Barack Obama.  (Applause.) 

Welcome back, sir.

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  It's good to be back.  (Applause.) 

Q    Well, we're thrilled to have you.

THE PRESIDENT:  It is good to be back.

Q    And a happy birthday.

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much.

Q    Happy birthday to you.

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  (Applause.)

Q    So how did you celebrate Sunday?  What did you do?

THE PRESIDENT:  I had a bunch of friends come over who I don't see that often from high school and college.  And we played a little golf, and then we tried to play a little basketball.  And it was a sad state of affairs.  (Laughter.) 

Q    Really? 

THE PRESIDENT:  A bunch of old guys.  Where's the Ibuprofen and all that stuff.  (Laughter.)

Q    But you're pretty competitive. 

THE PRESIDENT:  I am pretty competitive.  But the day of my birthday -- we do departure photos of people who are transitioning out of the White House.  And we let them bring their families and they take a picture in the Oval Office.  And this wonderful staff person came in and had a really cute, young son.  He looked like Harry Potter, a six-year-old guy.  (Laughter.)  He came in, he had an economic report for me.  He had graphs and everything.  (Laughter.)  And, he says, "My birthday is in August, too."  I said, "Well, how old are you going to be?"  He said, "Seven."  He said, "How old are you?"  I said, "Fifty-two."  He said, "Whoa."  (Laughter.)  Whoa.  Whoa.  (Laughter.)  He looked off in the distance.  He was trying to project.  (Laughter.)  

Q    Yes, you can't even -- 

THE PRESIDENT:  You can't go out that far.

Q    You can't grasp that number, no.  (Laughter.)  Now, I've seen Michelle tease you about your gray hair.  You have a bit of silver in your hair.  Do you tease back?

THE PRESIDENT:  No.  (Laughter and applause.)  That's why we're celebrating our 21st anniversary.  (Laughter.)  

Q    As I'm married 33 years, I know exactly what you're saying.  (Laughter.)  I've got to ask you about this.  Everyone is concerned about these embassy closings.  How significant is this threat?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, it's significant enough that we're taking every precaution.  We had already done a lot to bolster embassy security around the world, but especially in the Middle East and North Africa, where the threats tend to be highest.  And whenever we see a threat stream that we think is specific enough that we can take some specific precautions within a certain timeframe, then we do so. 

Now, it's a reminder that for all the progress we've made -- getting bin Laden, putting al Qaeda between Afghanistan and Pakistan back on its heels -- that this radical, violent extremism is still out there.  And we've got to stay on top of it.  It's also a reminder of how courageous our embassy personnel tend to be, because you can never have 100 percent security in some of these places.  The countries themselves sometimes are ill-equipped to provide the kind of security that you want.  Even if we reinforce it, there are still vulnerabilities. 

And these diplomats, they go out there and they serve every day.  Oftentimes, they have their families with them.  They do an incredible job and sometimes don't get enough credit.  So we're grateful to them and we've got to do everything we can to protect them.  (Applause.)

Q    This global travel warning, this is for Americans all around the world?  Are we telling people don't take that European vacation just yet?  What are we saying?

THE PRESIDENT:  I think the general rule is just show some common sense and some caution.  So there are some countries where you're less likely to experience a terrorist attack.  There are some where there are more dangers.  And if people are paying attention, checking with the State Department or embassy, going on the website before you travel, find out what kind of precautions you should be taking, then I think it still makes sense for people to take vacations.  They just have to make sure that they're doing so in a prudent way.

Q    What do you say to those cynics who go, oh, this is an overreaction to Benghazi -- how do you respond to that?

THE PRESIDENT:  One thing I've tried to do as President is not over react, but make sure that as much as possible the American people understand that there are genuine risks out there.  What's great about what we've seen with America over the last several years is how resilient we are.  So after the Boston bombing, for example, the next day folks were out there, they're going to ball games.  They are making sure that we're not reacting in a way that somehow shuts us down. 

And that's the right reaction.  Terrorists depend on the idea that we're going to be terrorized.  And we're going to live our lives.  And the odds of people dying in a terrorist attack obviously are still a lot lower than in a car accident, unfortunately.  But there are things that we can do to make sure that we're keeping the pressure on these networks that would try to injure Americans.  And the first thing I think about when I wake up and the last thing I think about when I go to bed is making sure that I'm doing everything I can to keep Americans safe.  (Applause.)   

Q    It's safe to say that we learned about these threats through the NSA intelligence program?  Is that a fair assessment?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, this intelligence-gathering that we do is a critical component of counterterrorism.  And obviously, with Mr. Snowden and the disclosures of classified information, this raised a lot of questions for people.  But what I said as soon as it happened I continue to believe in, which is a lot of these programs were put in place before I came in.  I had some skepticism, and I think we should have a healthy skepticism about what government is doing.  I had the programs reviewed.  We put in some additional safeguards to make sure that there's federal court oversight as well as congressional oversight, that there is no spying on Americans. 

We don't have a domestic spying program.  What we do have are some mechanisms where we can track a phone number or an email address that we know is connected to some sort of terrorist threat.  And that information is useful.  But what I've said before I want to make sure I repeat, and that is we should be skeptical about the potential encroachments on privacy.  None of the revelations show that government has actually abused these powers, but they're pretty significant powers. 

And I've been talking to Congress and civil libertarians and others about are there additional ways that we can make sure that people know nobody is listening to your phone call, but we do want to make sure that after a Boston bombing, for example, we've got the phone numbers of those two brothers -- we want to be able to make sure did they call anybody else?  Are there networks in New York, are there networks elsewhere that we have to roll up?  And if we can make sure that there's confidence on the part of the American people that there's oversight, then I think we can make sure that we're properly balancing our liberty and our security.

Q    When we come back, I want to ask you about Russia and Snowden.  I hit on something in the monologue which just seems incredible to me, and I want to get your thoughts on that.

More with the President when we come back.  (Applause.)

* * *

Q    Welcome back to our discussion with President Barack Obama.  (Applause.) 

Let me ask you about this -- the NSA leaker Edward Snowden.  Some call him a whistleblower.  What do you call him?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, we don’t know yet exactly what he did, other than what he’s said on the Internet, and it’s important for me not to prejudge something. 

Q    Got you.

THE PRESIDENT:  Hopefully, at some point he’ll go to trial and he will have a lawyer and due process, and we can make those decisions. 

I can tell you that there are ways, if you think that the government is abusing a program, of coming forward.  In fact, I, through executive order, signed whistleblower protection for intelligence officers or people who are involved in the intelligence industry.  So you don’t have to break the law.  You don’t have to divulge information that could compromise American security.  You can come forward, come to the appropriate individuals and say, look, I’ve got a problem with what’s going on here, I’m not sure whether it’s being done properly. 

If, in fact, the allegations are true, then he didn’t do that.  And that is a huge problem because a lot of what we do depends on terrorists networks not knowing that, in fact, we may be able to access their information.
 
Q    Let me add -- now, he was a contracted employee.

THE PRESIDENT:  Yes.

Q    And it seems the government has a lot of these.  I remember when I was coming up my brother was in ROTC, and in those days, they would take college students, you go into the Army, the Army would train you.  This guy is being paid money by an outside firm, living in Hawaii, got the stripper girlfriend. All of a sudden you’re all upset with what the government is doing, and you go to another country.  I mean, in my era, Daniel Ellsberg stood in the town square and said, “I’ve got this,” got arrested, The New York Times -- I mean, should we go back to not using so many -- whether it’s Blackwater or any of these contract -- these people who are Hessians, they get paid?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I think you’re raising an important issue.  We’ve been trying to reduce the reliance on contractors. Some of the contractors do a great job, and they’re patriots and they’re trying to support our mission.  Sometimes they can do it more efficiently or effectively if they’ve got some specialized knowledge.  But one of the things that I’ve asked our team to look at is, when it comes to intelligence, should we, in fact, be farming that much stuff out.  And there are a lot of extraordinarily capable folks in our military and our government who can do this, and probably do it cheaper, and then benefit from the training that they get so that when they transfer -- (applause) -- they’re in a better position.

Q    Now, were you surprised that Russia granted Snowden asylum?

THE PRESIDENT:  I was disappointed because even though we don’t have an extradition treaty with them, traditionally we have tried to respect if there’s a law-breaker or an alleged law-breaker in their country, we evaluate it and we try to work with them.  They didn’t do that with us.  And in some ways it’s reflective of some underlying challenges that we’ve had with Russia lately.  A lot of what’s been going on hasn’t been major breaks in the relationship, and they still help us on supplying our troops in Afghanistan; they’re still helping us on counterterrorism work; they were helpful after the Boston bombing in that investigation.  And so there’s still a lot of business that we can do with them.

But there have been times where they slip back into Cold War thinking and a Cold War mentality.  And what I consistently say to them, and what I say to President Putin, is that’s the past and we’ve got to think about the future, and there’s no reason why we shouldn’t be able to cooperate more effectively than we do.

Q    And Putin seems to me like one of those old-school KGB guys.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, he headed up the KGB.  (Laughter.)  

Q    Yes.  Well, that’s what I mean.  Yes, that’s what I mean.  He has that mentality.  I mean, look at this picture here. You two don’t look pretty -- (laughter) -- you look like me and the NBC executives.  What is going on there?  (Laughter.)  That doesn’t look like a friendly picture.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, the truth is, is that when we have meetings we can have some pretty blunt exchanges and animated exchanges.  But he’s got -- that seems to be his preferred style during press conferences, is sitting back and not looking too excited.  (Laughter.)  Now, part of it is he’s not accustomed to having press conferences where you’ve got a bunch of reporters yelling questions at you. 

Q    Now, the G20 summit is in St. Petersburg next --

THE PRESIDENT:  Coming up, right.

Q    Are you going to that and will you meet with Putin?

THE PRESIDENT:  I will be going to that.  I will be going to that because the G20 summit is the main forum where we talk about the economy, the world economy, with all the top economic powers in the world.  So it’s not something unique to Russia.  They’re hosting it this year, but it’s important for us, as the leading economy in the world, to make sure that we’re there -- in part because creating jobs, improving our economy, building up our manufacturing base, increasing wages -- all those things now depend on how we compete in this global economy.  And when you’ve got problems in Europe, or China is slowing down, that has an impact here in the United States. 

And I’ve been saying for the entire tenure of my presidency that my number-one priority at all times is how do we create an economy where, if you work hard in this country, you can succeed. And there are a lot of things that we can do here in this country, but we’ve also got to pay attention to what’s going on outside it.

Q    Well, something that shocked me about Russia -- and I’m surprised this is not a huge story -- suddenly, homosexuality is against the law.  I mean, this seems like Germany:  Let’s round up the Jews, let’s round up the gays, let’s round up the blacks. I mean, it starts with that.  You round up people who you don’t
-- I mean, why is not more of the world outraged at this?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I’ve been very clear that when it comes to universal rights, when it comes to people’s basic freedoms, that whether you are discriminating on the basis of race, religion, gender or sexual orientation, you are violating the basic morality that I think should transcend every country.  And I have no patience for countries that try to treat gays or lesbians or transgender persons in ways that intimidate them or are harmful to them.

Now, what’s happening in Russia is not unique.  When I traveled to Africa, there were some countries that are doing a lot of good things for their people, who we’re working with and helping on development issues, but in some cases have persecuted gays and lesbians.  And it makes for some uncomfortable press conferences sometimes.  But one of the things that I think is very important for me to speak out on is making sure that people are treated fairly and justly, because that’s what we stand for. And I believe that that’s a precept that’s not unique to America, that’s something that should apply everywhere.  (Applause.)

Q    Do you think it will affect the Olympics?

THE PRESIDENT:  I think Putin and Russia have a big stake in making sure the Olympics work, and I think they understand that for most of the countries that participate in the Olympics, we wouldn’t tolerate gays and lesbians being treated differently.  They’re athletes, they’re there to compete.  And if Russia wants to uphold the Olympic spirit, then every judgment should be made on the track, or in the swimming pool, or on the balance beam, and people’s sexual orientation shouldn’t have anything to do with it.  (Applause.)

Q    Good enough for me. 

We’ll be right back.  We’ll talk about the economy when we come back.

THE PRESIDENT:  Absolutely.

Q    More with President Obama right after this.  (Applause.)

    * * *

Q    Welcome back.  We’re talking with the President of the United States, Barack Obama. 

Hey, let’s talk about the economy.  Things seem to be getting better, seem to be improving.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, the economy is growing.

Q    Yes.

THE PRESIDENT:  The unemployment rate has been ticking down, and housing is improving.  We’ve seen the deficit cut in half.  Health care costs are actually going up slower than they have in -- any time in the last 50 years.  So there are a lot of good trends. 

Q    Right.

THE PRESIDENT:  But I think what folks all across the country would tell you is we’ve got a lot more work to do.  Wages and salaries haven’t gone up.  Middle-class families are still struggling to make sure they can pay for their kids’ college education.  They're still concerned about whether they can retire.

And what Washington should be thinking about every single day is how do we make sure we’ve got an economy where if folks work hard, they can find a good job that pays a decent wage;  they can send their kids to college; they've got health care they can count on; they can retire even if they don't get rich -- or even if they're not rich; and that we’re creating these ladders of opportunities for people to get into the middle class.

And what’s happened over the last 20 years is -- actually longer than that, probably over the last 30 -- is that the gap between those of us at the very top and the vast middle has been growing wider and wider.  And some of that is globalization.  Some of it is technology.  You go to a factory -- you’re a car guy -- if you go to an auto plant now, robots, and it’s clean as a whistle, and it doesn't employ as many people as it used to.  So a lot of those middle-class jobs have gone away.

And what we have to do is make sure that we are investing in infrastructure, research; making sure our kids are educated properly; and an improved and more stable housing market instead of the kind of bubbles that we had before.  All those things can really make a difference.

Q    You mentioned infrastructure.  Why is that a partisan issue?  I live in a town, the bridge is falling apart, it’s not safe.  How does that become Republican or Democrat?  How do you not just fix the bridge?  (Laughter and applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  I don't know.  As you know, for the last three years, I’ve said, let’s work together.  Let’s find a financing mechanism and let’s go ahead and fix our bridges, fix our roads, sewer systems, our ports.  The Panama is being widened so that these big supertankers can come in.  Now, that will be finished in 2015.  If we don't deepen our ports all along the Gulf -- places like Charleston, South Carolina, or Savannah, Georgia, or Jacksonville, Florida -- if we don't do that, those ships are going to go someplace else.  And we’ll lose jobs.  Businesses won’t locate here.

So this is something that traditionally has been bipartisan. I mean, it used to be Republicans and Democrats, they love cutting those ribbons.

Q    Yes.

THE PRESIDENT:  And we’ve got a bunch of construction workers who aren’t working right now.  They’ve got the skills.  They want to get on the job.  It would have a huge impact on the economy not just now, but well into the future.  So I’m just going to keep on pushing Republicans to join with us, and let’s try to do it.

Part of it is -- what they’ll say is, we like infrastructure, but we don't want to pay for it.  And one of the things I’ve been trying to get across here is, is that we don't need a huge government, but we need government doing some basic things, and we should all agree on a sensible mechanism to go ahead and pay for it -- make sure we don't waste money, make sure we’re cutting down on permitting times and delays, but let’s go ahead and get it done.

Q    Would it be possible to do a modern WPA, almost like a America Peace Corps where kids get paid a decent wage, you give them food, and they fix up Detroit, they fix up other cities --  whatever -- they fix bridges?  I mean, when you travel this country, you see these great bridges and things that were built by -- and they have the plaque, the guys that built it in 1932, in 1931.

THE PRESIDENT:  And it was incredibly important for not just the economy in the ‘30s, we use it still -- Golden Gate Bridge, Hoover Dam.  It opened up opportunity for everybody.  The Interstate Highway System -- think of all the businesses that got created because we put that together.

So it’s possible.  The question is do we have the political will to do it.  And my argument to Congress has been, this is just like your house.  You can put off fixing the roof.  You can put off doing the tuckpointing.  You can put off replacing the old boiler.  But sooner or later, you’re going to have to fix it, and it’s going to be more expensive the longer you put it off.  When we’ve got unemployed folks right now, we should be putting them to work, and it would be good for the entire country.  (Applause.)

Q    And let me ask you about something I’m seeing.  Is it me, or do I see kind of bromance with you and John McCain?  (Laughter.)  I remember you two had that lovers’ quarrel for a while.  And, oh, now, you’re, oh -- well, you’re best friends.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, you know that's how --

Q    What happened?

THE PRESIDENT:  That's how a classic romantic comedy goes, right?  (Laughter.)  Initially you’re not getting along, and then you keep on bumping into each other.  (Laughter.)  

Q    Yes, but what’s -- I mean, what changed?  Who saw the light?  (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  John McCain and I have a number of philosophical differences, but he is a person of integrity.  He is willing to say things regardless of the politics.  The fact that he worked hard with a group of Democratic and Republican senators on immigration reform; they passed a bill in the Senate that will make sure that folks who are here illegally have to pay back-taxes and pay a penalty and get to the back of the line, but over time have a pathway to citizenship, and make sure that we’re strengthening our borders.  He went ahead and passed that even though there are some questions in his own party.  So I think that he deserves credit for being somebody who is willing to go against the grain of his own party sometimes.  It’s probably not good for me to compliment him on television.

Q    Yes, yes.  (Laughter.)  Get a big head.

THE PRESIDENT:  But I think that he’s an example of a number of Republicans in the Senate, in the House, who want to be for something, not just be against everything.  (Applause.)  And the more that they can try to move in that direction, I think the better off we’ll be.

Q    Now, we’re going to take a break.  I want to talk about Hillary because I know you had lunch with her.

THE PRESIDENT:  Absolutely.

Q    My question -- my question when we come back, who asked who to lunch.  (Laughter.)  Don't answer.  Don't answer.  We’ll find out more with President Obama right after this.  (Applause.)

* * *

Q    (Applause.)  We are back with the President of the United States. 

You and Hillary had lunch last -- who invited who to lunch? I’m curious.

THE PRESIDENT:  I invited her.

Q    Okay.

THE PRESIDENT:  And we had a great time.  She had that post-administration glow.  (Laughter.)  You know, when folks leave the White House -- two weeks later, they look great.  (Laughter.)  But it was a wonderful conversation.  By the end of my first term, we had become genuinely close and I could not have more respect for her.  She was a great Secretary of State, and I'm  very, very proud of the work she did.  (Applause.)

Q    Did you notice her measuring the drapes or anything like that?  (Laughter.)  

THE PRESIDENT:  No.  Keep in mind, she’s been there before. 
Q    Right, that’s true.  That’s true.

THE PRESIDENT:  So she doesn’t have to measure them.

Q    So what’s the latest in health care?  What’s new?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, on October 1st, people are going to be able to sign up if they don’t have health care.  If you’ve got health care, you don’t have to do anything.  The only thing that’s happened for people who have health care right now is, is that you’ve been able to benefit from the fact that we put in place a law so that insurance companies have to spend 80 percent of your premiums on health care, and if they spend it on administrative costs and high CEO salaries, they’ve got to send you a rebate.  And that’s been affecting people.  (Applause.)

If you’ve got a kid who has just graduated, doesn’t have a job with health care, they can stay on their parent’s plan.  That’s in place right now.  Free preventive care and free contraceptive care for young women and families -- all that stuff is in place now.  No lifetime limits.  (Applause.)

So a lot of consumer protections got put in place.  But on October 1st, if you don’t have health care right now, you can join what are called these marketplaces and you’ll be able to get lower-cost health care.  Here in California, it’s estimated it will be 20, 30 percent cheaper than what you’re already getting. And we’ll give you subsidies -- tax credits, essentially -- if you still can’t afford it. 

So you can go to healthcare.gov and right now you can pre-register essentially and start figuring out is this plan right for you.

Q    Well, I was able to get health care from -- the guys who worked at my shop for me are all over 50.  They never had health care.  And I was able to get it now because you can’t be turned down.  So thank you for that.

THE PRESIDENT:  You can’t be turned down because of a preexisting condition.  That’s part of what we’re going to be doing.  (Applause.)

Q    Something I thought was -- I thought you spoke very eloquently about the Trayvon Martin case and I could tell you were speaking from the heart.  And tell me about that.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I think all of us were troubled by what happened.  And any of us who were parents can imagine the heart ache that those parents went through.  It doesn’t mean that Trayvon was a perfect kid -- none of us were.  We were talking offstage -- when you’re a teenager, especially a teenage boy, you’re going to mess up, and you won’t always have the best judgment.  But what I think all of us agree to is, is that we should have a criminal justice system that’s fair, that’s just.  And what I wanted to try to explain was why this was a particularly sensitive topic for African American families, because a lot of people who have sons know the experience they had of being followed or being viewed suspiciously. 

We all know that young African American men disproportionately have involvement in criminal activities and violence -- for a lot of reasons, a lot of it having to do with poverty, a lot of it having to do with disruptions in their neighborhoods and their communities, and failing schools and all those things.  And that’s no excuse, but what we also believe in is, is that people -- everybody -- should be treated fairly and the system should work for everyone.  (Applause.)  And so what I’m trying to do is just --

Q    I agree. 

THE PRESIDENT:  -- make sure that we have a conversation and that we’re all asking ourselves are there some things that we can do to foster better understanding, and to make sure that we don’t have laws in place that encourage the kind of violent encounter that we saw there that resulted in tragedy.

Q    Let me ask you something -- you told a group of young people that broccoli was your favorite food.  (Laughter.)  Now, lying to voters is one thing; lying to children, that’s -- (laughter and applause) -- well, that is --

THE PRESIDENT:  Let me say this --

Q    Can you put your right hand on a Bible and say, “Broccoli” -- (laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Let me say this -- I have broccoli a lot.  (Laughter.)  I mean, no, you can ask my staff. 

Q    Really?

THE PRESIDENT:  It is one of my staples.  Me and broccoli, I don’t know, we’ve got a thing going.  (Laughter.)

Q    Really? 

THE PRESIDENT:  It goes especially well with burgers and fries.

Q    Right, right.  (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Absolutely.

Q    And did Michelle make a broccoli cake with broccoli icing?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I won’t go that far.

Q    Now, did the kids believe you or did they go, “Oh, come on.”

THE PRESIDENT:  No, they did kind of -- they looked at me.  (Laughter.)  They had their little pads and pencils, and they were all, “Really?”  (Laughter.)  “More than chips?”  (Laughter.)

But to Michelle’s credit, the Let’s Move initiative that she’s been involved with that has gotten so many folks all around the country doing stuff to help kids exercise and eat right.  For the first time in a long time, we’ve started to see some modest reduction in childhood obesity.  So I think it’s making a difference.  (Applause.)

Q    Well, that’s good.  Really proud of that. 

Mr. President, it’s been an honor.  I know you have to go. 

THE PRESIDENT:  It was nice to see you.

Q    Thank you so much. 

THE PRESIDENT:  Before we go, well, Jay, I know you’re very proud of your car collection.

Q    Yes.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, there’s one piece that’s missing.

Q    Cool.

THE PRESIDENT:  This is the Beast. 

Q    The Beast!

THE PRESIDENT:  The one I drive in.  (Applause.)

Q    Oh, look at that.  My friend, Ed Wellburn, designed that car.  Will you sign the roof?

THE PRESIDENT:  I will sign the roof.

Q    Oh, cool.  (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Now, the doors are heavy, so when you’re getting in you may need a little help.  (Laughter.)

Q    I assume the real car will be at my garage after the show.  (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  There you go, Jay.

Q    Very good. 

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you so much.

Q    Mr. President, a pleasure and an honor, sir. 

THE PRESIDENT:  I appreciate it.

Q    Thank you very much.  (Applause.) 

END
5:16 P.M. PDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Press Gaggle by the Press Secretary and Sec. Shaun Donovan, 08/06/2013

PRESS GAGGLE
BY PRESS SECRETARY JAY CARNEY
AND
SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT SHAUN DONOVAN

 

Aboard Air Force One
En Route Phoenix, Arizona

11:52 A.M. EDT

MR. CARNEY:  Welcome aboard Air Force One today as we make our way to Phoenix, Arizona.  As you know, the President will be delivering another of his cornerstone speeches today in Phoenix, this one focused on how far we've come and the road we still need to travel when it comes to reviving our housing market.

Homeownership is a huge part of what we think of when we think of the American Dream, and making sure that middle-class Americans are able to own their homes and to do so with a sense of security is a key priority of the President's.

I have with me Secretary Shaun Donovan, and I would like him to give you a topper, if you will, about the President's remarks today and some of the things he's going to announce.  Then he can take questions from you on this subject.  And if you would, hold and reserve questions on other subjects, which I will then answer after Shaun is done. 

With that, I turn it over to the good Secretary -- Secretary Donovan.

SECRETARY DONOVAN:  Thanks, Jay.  As Jay laid out, housing is a critical cornerstone of the better bargain for the middle class that the President has been laying out over the last few weeks.  And not only is housing itself important, but the savings that Americans build up in homes are also absolutely critical to how most middle-class families pay for their kids to go to college, to pay to start small businesses, to save for retirement.  So it connects to the other cornerstone that the President is talking about as well.

We’re going back to Phoenix because four years ago, Phoenix was one of the hardest-hit places in the country.  Just a few weeks after taking office, the President traveled there to lay out his place for how to revive the housing market.  And as we travel back today, we have, not just in Phoenix but nationally, a housing market that has improved dramatically.  Home prices are rising at the fastest level in seven years.  Construction workers are going back to work building new homes.  We’ve gained $2.8 trillion in home equity in this country since the President traveled to Phoenix that time, and millions of families have been able to come up for air because they’re back above water on their mortgages.

But what the President is going to say is that we need to do two critical things to really build the 21st-century platform that we need for middle-class families.  First, we can and we must accelerate the housing recovery that we’re seeing.  We still have too many families in Arizona and across the country that are hurting, too many communities that are still suffering the effects of the housing crisis.  And so he’s going to lay out five things that we can do in the short run, specific steps that we can take to help accelerate the housing market recovery -- things like helping many more families refinance their mortgages.

We’ve already helped over 2 million families with government-guaranteed mortgages refinance.  It’s been one of the critical things that has helped accelerate our economic recovery.  Those families are saving over $3,000 a year each and every year -- like a major tax cut.  We need to help more families do that, particularly families that don’t have government-guaranteed mortgages. 

He’s going to talk about the fact that it’s too difficult for families that can be successful homeowners to get a mortgage today, and specific steps that we can take to help that.  He’s going to talk about how we helped the hardest-hit communities renovate and rebuild, even demolish in some cases vacant and abandoned homes, and a set of other steps as well.

But he’s also going to focus on the fact that we cannot let a crisis like the one that we saw, which devastated trillions of dollars of savings, wreaked havoc on families and communities around the country, and even put our world economy at risk -- we cannot let a crisis like that happen again.  And that means building a rock-solid foundation for housing going forward.  That means creating a housing finance system, first and foremost, that does not repeat the mistakes of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

So he’s going to lay out four specific principles that any legislation needs to follow.  He’s encouraged by the bipartisan progress that we’re seeing on Capitol Hill.  He believes that that legislation in the Senate Banking Committee that’s being discussed meets his -- broadly meets his four principles that he’s going to lay out today.  He believes they need to go further in certain aspects, particularly in making sure that housing is affordable going forward.  But he’s encouraged by that progress and he wants to make sure that that progress continues.

But he also believes there are things that we can do today with our own authorities that can make our housing finance system safer.  We can make sure that we continue to take steps to wind down the government presence in the housing market -- and he’s going to lay out a series of those steps as well -- and that we can make mortgages safer and simpler in this country.

Before the crisis, families buying a toaster were better protected than making the most important financial decision of their lives.  And so the President will talk about what we can do, whether it’s a three-page simple form that every homeowner should see before they make the decision to buy, rather than the reams of fine print that they see today, and a series of other steps that we can take to make mortgages simpler and safer and better for middle-class families and those striving to be in the middle class.

So with that, let me stop and I’ll take your questions.

Q    Can I ask a question?  You mentioned the Senators Warner and Corker’s bill.  So he won’t support it but he -- he supports it in concept, but he’s not going to endorse it -- is that the right way to say that?

SECRETARY DONOVAN:  Well, we’re waiting to see details of that bill, but we also know that Senators Reid and particularly, most importantly, Chairman Johnson and also Ranking Member Crapo are working themselves.  And so what he’s saying -- and this is, I would say, similar to what we have seen on immigration reform

-- he’s not going to agree with every detail, but broadly speaking, he believes this bill meets his four key principles that he’ll lay out today, but he does want to see them go farther in certain areas, particularly on making housing affordable.

Q    Housing experts say that the situation in Phoenix, while it’s obviously improved since it hit rock bottom, is due in large part to the fact that when the housing prices fell, investors came in, scooped up some of these distressed properties, and are now either selling them for a profit or renting them out at higher prices.  Is that really a strong example of the housing increases and improvements that the government wants to highlight, when it’s largely focused on investors, not sort of an average homeowner?

SECRETARY DONOVAN:  First of all, I would argue with that analysis.  Less than one in five homes in America is being bought by investors.  Close to a third of all new homes are being bought by first-time homebuyers.  And so just in terms of the numbers, while investors have been part of the story, they certainly haven’t driven it, and in a place like Phoenix, that number is actually declining pretty rapidly. 

On the other hand, what I would say -- and this I part of what the President will lay out today -- even though we're seeing more and more first-time home-buyers and others be able to get into the market, we still have millions of families that could be successful homeowners that are having trouble getting a mortgage. And that's why he's going to lay out specific steps that we need to take in the short run from streamlining duplicative regulations, simplifying those; setting clear rules of the road for enforcement going forward.

And one that's particularly important to me that we're going to be undertaking at FHA -- we have millions of families who have been able to go back to work, 7.3 million new private sector jobs over the last 41 months.  We know many of those homeowners -- many of those workers, whether they were former homeowners or continue to be homeowners today, they're folks that had very good credit records before they might have lost a job, or lost hours. They're now getting back to work.  What we're saying is if they've had a full year of being able to show they're back to being able to have very strong credit, pay on their mortgages, we ought to take additional steps to help them be able to buy a home or to refinance or do other things with their mortgage.

So that's an example -- we call it Back To Work -- specific policy that we're undertaking that can help expand the number of first-time buyers or even folks who've been successful homeowners in the past to get into the market. 

Q    Will his calling today for winding down Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae actually lead to it happening?  I mean, this is something that's been discussed since the 2008 campaign and probably before.  What about it is different today that will actually lead to some change on that?

SECRETARY DONOVAN:  Well, first of all, there are two things that are different.  If you'd asked most commentators around D.C. six months ago or even three months ago whether we were going to make any progress on this issue, most would have said no.  But we've seen over the last few months the Bipartisan Policy Center, led by a strong bipartisan group of former senators and housing leaders, put out a proposal.  We've seen now real movement in the Senate towards strongly bipartisan reform.  And so the President is encouraged by that bipartisan cooperation and wants to work closely with the Senate Banking Committee, with Chairman Johnson, Ranking Member Crapo, and all members of Congress to get that legislation done.

But the other thing that he talks about today and that we'll lay out is that there are specific steps we can take short of legislation to move the housing finance system in the right direction, including winding down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- specific steps like making sure their portfolios are shrinking by at least 15 percent a year.  In some ways, Fannie and Freddie operated like hedge funds, buying and selling all kinds of investments that didn’t have to do with their core mission.  We ought to wind down those portfolios as quickly as possible.

He also talked -- in the factsheet that you can review, we lay out specific ideas for making sure that private capital sits in front of taxpayer risk even on current loans that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are issuing.  Those are steps that we are undertaking and we can accelerate.  We talk about using our own authorities to wind down loan limits, lower loan limits, not only for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but also for FHA.

So those are just a few examples of the concrete steps that we are taking and we can take to limit taxpayer exposure, to bring more private capital back into the market, and that's one of the core principles that the President will lay out today.  For any housing finance system, private capital has to be at the center of that system, and taxpayers can't be on the hook for risk in the way that they were before.

Essentially, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac operated with a model -- heads they win; tails taxpayers lose.  And that's got to stop.

Anybody else got other questions?

Q    We're good.

Q    I like that toaster line.  That was a good one.

SECRETARY DONOVAN:  Elizabeth Warren.  I should quote her.

MR. CARNEY:  I want to thank Secretary Donovan for joining us today and answering your questions on the housing market.  And with that, I will take your questions on other issues.

Q    Has the President spoken to former President George W. Bush about his stent?  Has he wished him well?  Give us an update.

MR. CARNEY:  I don't believe the President has spoken with the former President.  He has been briefed informally on former President Bush's medical procedure and obviously wishes him well. And I don't have anything more on that for you.

Q    Is the President involved at all with the decision to evacuate United States personnel from the embassy in Yemen?

MR. CARNEY:  The President has been briefed and updated regularly on the steps that are being taken in response to the potential threat occurring in or emanating from the Arabian Peninsula.  These are decisions that are being made by the State Department and I would refer you to the State Department for specifics about the personnel who left and the personnel who remain.  But certainly the President is briefed in real time on these matters and concurs with the decisions that have been made.

Q    Does he see this step as any type of new threat, new information that's come out in the last 24 hours or so, or is it just another step in responding to what you already knew when you closed the embassies?

MR. CARNEY:  Again, I would refer you to the State Department for details about the specific personnel decisions that are being made.  As I said yesterday, we are responding to the information that we have and, out of an abundance of caution, taking steps to ensure the security of American personnel and of facilities in a variety of countries around the region and the world.

The threat is ongoing and it's real, and we consider it serious.  We believe that it will -- that it is occurring in or emanating from the Arabian Peninsula, but we obviously cannot rule anything out when it comes to how the threat might manifest itself.

Q    Jay, did the President have a reaction to yesterday's news about The Washington Post being sold?

MR. CARNEY:  I don't have a reaction to read out to you.  As somebody who was born in Washington and considers the Post my hometown newspaper, I was I think as surprised as a lot of people were by the news, but certainly wish the institution of The Washington Post, with its storied history and everyone who works there in pursuit of quality journalism, all the best with this transition.

Q    Can I just go back to former President Bush for a minute?  When did he hear about it and how did he hear?

MR. CARNEY:  I haven’t spoken to President Obama in great detail about it.  I’m not sure.

Q    Just real quick on the Bezos purchase of The Washington Post, the President spoke with Bezos last week, I believe.  Did this come up in their conversation at all?

MR. CARNEY:  I don't have a specific readout of that.  I’m not aware that that came up.

Q    Does the President have an iPad or a Kindle?

MR. CARNEY:  I think it’s well known that the President has an iPad.  I’m not sure about his other technology purchases.

Q    You’re opening up the possibility the President has a Kindle?  Is that -- we’re leaving room for that?

MR. CARNEY:  I think I mentioned the other day that I’m on my second Kindle.  I also have an iPhone and a Macbook Air.  So I’m -- 

Q    It’s always about you, isn’t it?

MR. CARNEY:  It’s always about me when it comes to technology.

Yes.

Q    You mentioned yesterday that there would be news in the coming days about the Russia trip.  Can you give us any update on the decision-making process there?

MR. CARNEY:  I can’t.  We’re still looking at the utility of a bilateral summit in Moscow.  I have no updates on that process. We obviously have a range of issues to discuss with the Russians in areas of both conflict and potential progress, and we’re evaluating all of that as we assess the utility of a bilateral summit.

Q    What is the President’s current state of mind about Putin and the Russia relationship at this point?  How does he feel about things?

MR. CARNEY:  As I expressed in the wake of the decision by Russian authorities to grant temporary asylum to Mr. Snowden, we are extremely disappointed by that decision and feel that it was unnecessary in view of our strongly held position that there was legal justification for Mr. Snowden’s expulsion from Russia and return to the United States where he faces three felony counts and will be, upon his return, accorded the full rights and protections of a defendant in this country.

 

I noted at the time that we’ve had significant law enforcement cooperation with the Russians in the past, and that was especially true and has especially been true in the wake of the Boston bombing.  We felt that it was not necessary for the Snowden situation to do any damage to our relationship with Russia.  That was a view expressed by Russian officials, including President Putin, and that we shared it.

Unfortunately, this decision was made, and we’re assessing, as I said, the utility of a summit in Moscow in light of that and in light of a number of other issues.

Q    Just to go back to the embassy closures for a second.  There was a lot of discussion in the briefing yesterday about the difference between core al Qaeda and al Qaeda affiliates.   And following the briefing, it’s been reported by several news organizations that the actual conversations that were intercepted that led to these closures were conversations between Zawahiri, who is the leader of core al Qaeda, and then the leader of the Al Qaeda affiliate in Yemen.  So does the White House still stand by the assertion that the core al Qaeda has been decimated, is on the run, when this threat is emanating at least in part from core al Qaeda?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, we do stand by that.  There is no question that core al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan has been severely diminished, its leadership decimated, and there’s no question that it’s on the run.  For many years now it has become -- it has been less organized and less capable of directing attacks on the scale that it was able to do most notably on 9/11. And that remains the case.

And as the President said, I would note, at his speech in NDU, since this was a question yesterday, he noted that core al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan is on the path to defeat.  Then he also said, “What we’ve seen is the emergence of various al Qaeda affiliates -- from Yemen to Iraq, from Somalia to North Africa.  The threat today is more diffuse, with al Qaeda’s affiliate in the Arabian Peninsula, AQAP, the most active in plotting against our homeland.  While none of AQAP’s efforts approach the scale of 9/11, they have continued to plot attacks of terror, like the attempt to blow up an airplane on Christmas Day in 2009.”

So what the President said then I think is reflected in what we’re seeing now.  And when it comes to al Qaeda core, to the extent that they play a role, it is, in our view, inspirational.

And while I can't address reports about intelligence, I would say that that remains our view.

Q    Jay, does it say anything to this attack -- or should we read anything into it -- the President has maintained a normal schedule through the weekend, doing this event today.  We haven’t heard him make public comments thus far.  Does that give any insight as to exactly what this threat may be?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, we’ve been very clear with the warning that we've issued and with the actions taken by the State Department and obviously with a number of actions that are taken -- seen and unseen -- by Homeland Security and other parts of our national security apparatus that we take this threat very seriously.  And the President has directed his national security team, including Counterterrorism and Homeland Security Advisor Lisa Monaco, as well as other members of that team, to take all steps necessary to ensure the security of American citizens and American personnel abroad. 

As we've said, and I said yesterday, we have been living in a world for some time now where we face an organization in al Qaeda and in its affiliates that aspires to do harm to the United States, aspires to do harm to the American people.  And we have to maintain constant vigilance in the face of those threats to do everything we can to disrupt them, to do everything we can to bring to justice those who would perpetrate them.  And that's what we're doing. 

Q    I don't think you commented yesterday about baseball.  Have you talked to the President about the scandal from yesterday and does he have a response -- reaction?

MR. CARNEY:  The President believes that our professional athletes have an important responsibility as role models, especially to our children.  And his views on performance-enhancing drugs are clear.  But I don't have a specific reaction to the announcement by Major League Baseball yesterday, but he believes it's the duty and responsibility of our athletes to be quality role models for our children.

Q    For the Leno show tonight, can you speak a little bit about what the President thinks and what you think you get specifically out of appearing on The Tonight Show, who you're reaching that you're not reaching otherwise by doing that appearance?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, it's certainly not the first time this President or other Presidents or other political leaders have appeared on The Tonight Show or shows like it.  I think the reason why we've agreed to appear on shows like this is because we're trying to communicate with Americans where they are.  And the viewers of late-night shows are not necessarily the readers of newspapers or wire services, or necessarily viewers of cable or broadcast news shows. 

So the President looks forward to it.  He has done The Tonight Show on a number of occasions.  He has obviously done a variety of other shows.  And as I think was noted sometime on occasion last year, some of his more substantive interviews have appeared in non-traditional settings.  So you never know what you might get.

Q    Is there a kind of viewer that he thinks he wants to reach out to by appearing on The Tonight Show as opposed to the David Letterman Show?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, I'll leave it to the media critics to make those kind of distinctions.  (Laughter.)  But the answer is I think the category is something that, like others, we look at in trying to reach as many Americans as we can and in the ways that we can.  As you know, the President recently gave a lengthy interview to The New York Times, which I guess some would argue would be targeting a different audience.

Q    Could you maybe bring back your esteemed colleague, Dan Pfieffer, to claim on the relative merits of going to The Tonight Show?

MR. CARNEY:  I have Mr. Pfieffer's proxy on that question today.

Q    Thanks, Jay.

END
12:16 P.M. EDT 

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

FACT SHEET: A Better Bargain for the Middle Class: Housing

When President Obama took office, our housing market was in free-fall, leaving many families feeling trapped and anxious about their mortgages.  The President took immediate action to stabilize our housing market and protect the middle class.  These steps helped millions of middle class families stay in their homes, save money on their mortgages, and turn their communities around.

Working together we need to build a more durable and fair system that promotes the American Dream of homeownership, while preventing the nightmare of another crisis.  Today, our housing market is coming back.  Home values are rising, foreclosures are at the lowest levels since 2006, home sales have increased at double digit rates, and American families are on pace to purchase over 5 million homes this year.  In part because of President Obama's tough regulations that cracked down on the most reckless practices from the housing crisis, responsible Americans can feel more confident and secure when they borrow money to purchase their own home.  But the job is not done, and restoring security to homeownership is one of the President’s top economic priorities. 

In today’s speech, the President laid out his ideas to help more responsible homeowners refinance, to cut red tape, to increase home values by fixing our broken immigration system, to help the hardest hit communities rebuild, and to ensure those who rent have decent and affordable options.  The President also made it clear that going back to the same bubble-and-bust housing system that caused the financial crisis is not acceptable. We need a rock-solid foundation for financing homeownership with a bigger role for the private sector, where taxpayers aren’t on the hook for the irresponsible behavior or bad decisions of financial institutions and we finally put an end to an era where Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could expect a bailout for risky behavior in pursuit of profits. These bipartisan solutions will help build on the progress we’ve made over the last four years, and together we can make owning a home a symbol of responsibility and a source of security for generations to come.

A Better Bargain for the Middle Class: Housing

A Better Bargain for Responsible, Middle Class Homeowners:

  • Help responsible families save $3,000 a year by refinancing while mortgage rates are still low
  • Take executive action to cut red tape so responsible families can get a mortgage
  • Fix our broken immigration system to increase home values
  • Rebuild communities hit hardest by foreclosure
  • Create and preserve affordable rental housing by passing a bipartisan Senate proposal 

Core Principles for Durable, Fair Housing Finance (GSE) Reform:

  • Put private capital at the center of the housing finance system
  • End Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s failed business model so taxpayers are never again on the hook for bad loans and bailouts
  • Ensure widespread access to safe, responsible financing like the 30-year fixed rate mortgage
  • Support affordability and access for renters and homeownership for first-time buyers, in part by continuing the historic affordability role of Federal Housing Administration (FHA) 

Making Families’ Most Important Financial Decision Safe and Simple:

  • Ensure all prospective homeowners receive a single, simple three-page mortgage disclosure form
  • Increase incentives for lenders to deliver high quality loans and products
  • Level the playing field for financial institutions of all sizes so borrowers can work with the lender right for them 

Confirming Mel Watt Will Provide Certainty and Leadership During This Key Phase:

  • Congress should swiftly confirm the President’s FHFA Director nominee Mel Watt to further accelerate efforts toward common sense housing finance reform 

A Better Bargain for Responsible, Middle Class Homeowners

There are several additional steps – including legislative proposals – that could immediately work to further strengthen the housing market and ensure that the middle class can secure affordable mortgages, refinance their loans at today’s low rates, and build housing wealth while ensuring that no communities or homeowners are left behind by the housing recovery.

  • Help Responsible Families Save $3,000 a Year by Refinancing While Mortgage Rates are Still Low:  President Obama has set the goal of eliminating all barriers to refinancing for responsible borrowers. The Administration worked with housing regulators to implement key changes to the government’s refinancing program (HARP) that nearly tripled the number of families who received refinancings from 400,000 in 2011 to 1.1 million in 2012, bringing the HARP program total to more than 2.6 million. To complete the task of providing refinancing options for all responsible borrowers, the President has proposed the following three steps:
  • Streamline refinancing for borrowers with government-insured mortgages. 
  • Waive closing costs for borrowers who refinance into shorter term loans to more rapidly rebuild equity in their homes.
  • Expand eligibility for refinancing to many hundreds of thousands of eligible borrowers who do not have government-backed mortgages by creating special programs through the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. 

These steps could help a typical family save $3,000 or more per year.

Cut Red Tape so Responsible Families Can Get a Mortgage: There are still millions of families with strong enough credit profiles to qualify for a mortgage but who are nonetheless being denied loans. According to the Federal Reserve, from 2007 to 2012, mortgage lending to borrowers with credit scores above 780 fell by a third, while lending to borrowers with credit scores between 620-680 declined by roughly 90%. For many of these borrowers, they are denied a loan because lenders are unclear of the rules of the road for lending and are protecting themselves by only lending to those with the most pristine credit.  The Administration is continuing to work with housing regulators and stakeholders on reasonable approaches to clarify rules and reduce overlapping regulations, in order to expand access to credit for qualifying families.  The CFPB’s recently finalized Qualified Mortgage (QM) rule is an important step forward in providing certainty while protecting consumers. The FHA is completing its own QM rule to align with the CFPB and ensure access for the wide-range of responsible borrowers that the agency has historically served.  In other cases, temporary unemployment or other hardships that borrowers have overcome still stand in the way of getting a mortgage, even though these borrowers may have strong pay histories and have gotten back on their feet. Going forward:

  • Regulators should implement mortgage related rules in a way that encourages the clarity and certainty that leads to broad access to credit and a safe and sound system.
  • We need to establish more certain, brighter-line rules for when government will rescind its guarantees, to give lenders greater clarity and encourage more lending to creditworthy borrowers. HUD is working to update its rules along these lines, and will work with FHFA and other federal agencies to institute a common framework for government guarantees across the market.
  • FHA is also working on additional lending flexibilities through an initiative called "Back to Work" that will make certain that creditworthy re-employed borrowers with strong recent pay histories are not unfairly excluded from access to FHA lending, while doing so in a responsible manner that protects the FHA Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund (MMIF).

Fix Our Broken Immigration System to Increase Home Values:  In addition to growing GDP, the common sense immigration reform passed by the United States Senate would substantially increase home values. Between 2000 and 2010, immigrants accounted for almost 40% of new homeowners nationwide. Immigrants accounted for over 80 percent of the growth in homeowners in California and over two-thirds of the growth in homeowners in New York over the past decade. Elsewhere, such as Georgia and North Carolina, they accounted for between one-quarter and one-third of the growth in homeowners.

Help Hard Hit Communities Rebuild: While the housing market has turned a corner, the recovery has been uneven across geographies.  In fact, five states (NV, FL, MI, AZ, & GA) account for 33% of the total negative equity in the U.S., and in twenty-five states, 15% or more of total mortgages are in negative equity. In these communities hit hardest by the foreclosure crisis, the weight of foreclosed and vacant properties will continue to hold back growth and drive down home prices absent additional intervention. To address this problem, the President expanded the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP), which has provided $7 billion to thousands of communities across all 50 states to refurbish vacant properties in areas facing foreclosure and abandonment. But more work remains to be done. That’s why President Obama:

  • Proposed $15 billion for Project Rebuild in the American Jobs Act to help more hard hit communities turn the corner to recovery by getting their construction workers back on the job rehabbing and in some cases demolishing blighted vacant homes, creating jobs and improving communities.
  • Working with states to use their Hardest Hit Funds (HHF) for blight elimination efforts to prevent additional foreclosures and help turn around distressed regions. The Administration worked with Michigan, which recently announced plans to use $100 million of its existing HHF allocation for demolition and greening of blighted properties – with a sizeable amount committed to Detroit. The Administration is also working with Ohio implement a similar blight elimination program using their Hardest Hit Funds. Going forward, the Administration will explore opportunities to work with other HHF states, with the potential to help hundreds of communities rebound.
  • Introduced the Distressed Asset Stabilization Program (DASP) to partner with local communities to find new solutions for thousands of defaulted FHA loans. These solutions will help struggling borrowers stay in their homes and make sure their homes become assets in their communities, not a blight that drags down their neighbors' home values.

Create and Preserve Affordable Rental Housing: While homeownership is recovering, middle class and poor renters are facing unprecedented affordability burdens.   Every two years, HUD has issued a report that measures the scale of critical housing problems facing un-assisted renters.  Based on data from the 2011 American Housing Survey, these “Worst Case Housing Needs” grew to 8.5 million households, a 19 percent increase from the previous record high in 2009 (7.1 million households), and a staggering 43.5 percent increase since 2007. HUD’s report finds that housing needs cut across: all regions of the country; all racial and ethnic groups; cities, suburbs and rural areas; and various household types including families with children, senior citizens, and persons with disabilities.  To fight these challenges, the Obama Administration:

  • Urges Congress to pass a bipartisan budget that invests in decent rental housing and builds our transportation infrastructure
  • Supports incentives like the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) and the New Market Tax Credit (NMTC), and calls on Congress to continue to fund these priorities.
  • Created the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) and other tools to preserve affordable rental housing for families and seniors. Launched a year ago, RAD is already saving nearly 18,000 units of housing at no cost to taxpayers by generating nearly $800 million in private sector investment which will support about 10,000 local jobs. We will work with Congress and our partners in state and local government to expand these tools to more communities across the nation.
  • Launched the Promise Zones initiative to partner with hard-hit, high-poverty communities to build affordable housing, create jobs, leverage private investment, increase economic activity, enrich educational opportunities, and improve public safety. HUD’s Choice Neighborhoods, a highly competitive grant program that attracts eight dollars of private and other funding for every federal dollar, is a key building block for Promise Zones, and is based on two decades of bipartisan innovation that has developed nearly 100,000 units of mixed-income housing in 260 communities.
  • Announced Opening Doors, the first-ever f ederal strategic plan to prevent and end homelessness in 2010.  Marshaling 19 federal agencies in partnership with state and local community partners, the Plan makes an historic commitment to ending veteran and chronic homelessness by 2015, ending homelessness for families, youth and children by 2020 and setting a path to eradicate all types of homelessness in the United States. Despite encouraging significant progress in lowering veteran and chronic homelessness since the President took office, for the Plan to succeed, Congress must increase smart, proven investments in rental housing that not only get our citizens off the streets, but save taxpayer dollars currently spent on emergency health services and institutional care.

Reduce Local Barriers to Housing Development:  In many productive regions – where companies are flocking to do business – it’s harder for them to find workers because it’s so hard for those workers to find housing.  In some cases, this difficulty is not for lack of developers who are willing to invest, or construction workers wanting to get back to work – it’s because localities have not gotten around to reforming outdated, decades-old rules on housing development.  Overly burdensome barriers to developing new housing reduce the ability of housing supply to respond to demand, and cause higher housing costs for working families.  In the most heavily regulated communities, delays for development approval average ten and a half months, compared to just over three months in less regulated communities.  To resolve these challenges, business coalitions like the Silicon Valley Leadership Group and the Chicago Commercial Club have partnered with their local policymakers to modernize their housing development policies, and ensure their employees are able to find housing. 

Core Principles for Durable, Fair Housing Finance (GSE) Reform

A. New Housing Financing System for Middle Class Families and Economic Stability: Today, the President made clear it is time to turn the page on an era of housing bubbles and taxpayer bailouts, and build a new housing finance system that will provide secure homeownership for responsible middle class families. The President’s plan is centered on four core principles for reform: putting private capital first, ending the failed Fannie/Freddie business model and protecting the taxpayers, ensuring broad access to the 30-year fixed rate mortgage in good times and bad, and preserving the American dream of affordable homeownership for all qualifying borrowers in every community while at the same time ensuring sustainable rental options are widely available. The President stands ready to work with members of Congress in both parties to enact common sense housing finance legislation based on these core principles.

  1. Put Private Capital at the Center of the Housing Finance System. The current housing finance system, where the government guarantees more than 80% of all mortgages through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and FHA, is unsustainable.  A reformed system must have a limited government role, encourage a return of private capital, and put the risk and rewards associated with mortgage lending in the hands of private actors, not the taxpayers.
  2. End Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s Failed Business Model So Taxpayers Are Never Again on the Hook for Bad Loans and Bailouts. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should be wound down through a responsible transition, and the government role during normal times should be no bigger than necessary to achieve the principles laid out here.  One of the failures of the old Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac model is that shareholders and senior managers benefitted from implicit guarantees while taxpayers were on the hook. We must end Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and going forward:
  • Private capital must be wiped out before the government pays out on catastrophic guarantees provided through government reinsurance of private-market loans.
  • Private capital should bear the substantial majority of losses, and we will end taxpayer bailouts for good.
  • The government role should be transparent and explicit, where its obligations and liabilities are clearly spelled out.
  • The government should collect explicit and actuarially-fair premiums for the catastrophic guarantee it provides.
  • An independent regulator should be strong enough to implement and enforce rules consistent with these principles.

 

  1. Ensure Widespread Access to Safe and Responsible Mortgages like the 30-year Fixed Rate Mortgage in Good and Bad Economic Times. Broad access to mortgage credit for qualified borrowers in all communities should be an integral policy objective of housing finance reform, consistent with mortgage rules and capital standards that promote safety and soundness.
  • Reform should include a commitment to ensure confidence of long-term investors in mortgage backed securities to ensure the continuation of the 30 year mortgage in good times and bad. Home ownership remains the primary way that most middle income working families build long-term wealth and provides a foundation for widely shared economic growth.  Consistent access to safe standardized mortgage products, through good times and bad, facilitates growth and mobility.
  • Mortgage lending in the reformed system should reflect a competitive marketplace with a level playing field for all qualified borrowers and market participants. Community banks should be guaranteed the same access to the capital markets as the big banks.
  • Responsible and borrower-friendly innovation in the mortgage market is necessary both to reduce costs and create products that meet the needs of consumers.  Homeowners often pay repeat costs when refinancing their mortgages, many of which can be eliminated through technology and creative new solutions.  New approaches can lower the barriers to homeownership and help families keep their homes during economic downturns.   
  1. Support Affordability and Access to Homeownership for Creditworthy First-Time Buyers and Access to Affordable Rental Housing for Middle Class Families and Those Aspiring to Be. In a reformed system, the government should continue to provide robust, explicit, and targeted support to help ensure access to affordable and sustainable mortgage products for low-wealth, first-time homebuyers, and borrowers in historically underserved communities. Recognizing that affordable rental housing is also an important housing option for many families, the government should help ensure a deep and liquid financing market for the development and rehabilitation of multifamily housing. As part of this commitment:
  • A reformed housing finance system must keep the doors of opportunity open to all responsible families by ensuring that credit is available to underserved communities.   
  • The government should continue to provide direct loan or loan guarantee/insurance for certain underserved borrowers and communities through the FHA, VA, and USDA.  This targeted support must be provided with full commitment to the safety and soundness of the FHA’s MMIF and to ongoing efforts to strengthen FHA programs. 
  • Reform should include a broad and explicit assessment on mortgage backed securities and other appropriate mortgage products. This assessment would be paid for by financial institutions and not borrowers, and would be used to fund targeted support for down payment assistance, preservation or construction of housing for very low income households, or other innovations that bolster the efforts of low wealth working families to improve their prospects for achieving sustainable homeownership or finding affordable housing.
  • The housing finance system must also support liquidity and stability of multifamily rental housing financing throughout economic cycles by making sure that the financing market for multifamily loans is strong enough and flexible enough to support the construction and rehabilitation of all types of multifamily housing, including rental housing for households at or below the median income and households that have had to leave the single family sector over the last few years. Access to rental housing near good jobs and schools helps build stronger families and communities.

B. Intermediate Steps to Transition to a New Housing Finance System: While bi-partisan legislation will be critical to creating a new housing finance system,  non-legislative steps can be taken now to facilitate a gradual transition to the new system and to facilitate the wind down of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, including:

  1. Continue to aggressively wind-down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s investment portfolios by at least 15% per year.  This will reduce Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s holdings of risky mortgages and related securities to a manageable balance by 2018.
  2. Accelerate a process of systematically reducing the government’s direct credit risk exposure by bringing private capital in front of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guarantee.  The government currently takes direct credit risk on more than 80% of all new mortgage originations, through FHA, VA, USDA, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. There are two key approaches for reducing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s credit loss exposure: 1) a capital markets approach in which private investors take on the risk of the portfolio’s first losses (a “risk syndication model”); and 2) an insurance approach in which well capitalized and regulated private institutions insure a portfolio of mortgages against default and collect insurance premiums (a “mortgage insurance model” or “MI”).  The period of transition before Congress passes comprehensive legislation should be used to continue aggressively piloting these approaches to both reduce the government’s exposure and gain valuable insights about the most efficient ways to encourage private capital back into the housing finance system.
  3. Prioritize the development of a common infrastructure / securitization platform that private actors can leverage.  FHFA has directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to pursue the important work of developing a common securitization infrastructure. This platform can also help facilitate securitizations by private companies by providing essential services and standardization which could help foster competition, better protect consumers, and increase investor comfort in investing in mortgage backed securities.
  4. Reduce loan limits in a manner consistent with our housing finance reform principles and market developments.  In response to the credit crisis, Congress increased the maximum loan limits for government-insured single family properties.  In order to reduce the government’s footprint over several years, we recommend allowing FHA loan limits to fall at the end of 2013 as currently scheduled. Beyond that, HUD and FHFA should closely examine using their existing authorities to reduce loan limits further consistent with the pace of the recovery, market developments, and the Administration’s principles and transition plan for housing finance reform.  Any changes should take into account regional differences in housing prices, and also regional variation in the pace of the housing recovery.
  5. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should gradually shrink their multifamily footprint by reducing support of high-end properties, while exploring ways to serve the unmet mortgage needs of smaller multifamily properties and loan sizes. During this transition period, further work should determine how Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can better support smaller multifamily loans of $1-5 million, especially because these properties often provide affordable rental housing.

C. Strengthen the FHA to Preserve the Important Role it Plays in Providing Access to Mortgage Credit for Many Middle-Class Families, Including First Time Homebuyers: It is important for Congress to preserve the important role that FHA plays in providing mortgage access for many first-time or low wealth home buyers and historically underserved communities, in a range of economic environments. Steps can be taken to strengthen the FHA Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund (MMIF ) and FHA’s operational effectiveness while still maintaining FHA’s ability to play its intended role. The Administration will work with Congress to adopt these appropriately tailored reforms. Meanwhile, FHA will use its administrative authorities to continue to tailor its programs where necessary to address emerging risks. It will also continue innovating in ways consistent with its Congressional mandate to better serve its borrowers, such as leveraging energy efficiency cost savings to make FHA mortgages more sustainable and the proposed Back to Work flexibilities ensuring creditworthy re-employed borrowers with strong recent pay histories are not unfairly excluded from access to FHA lending. 

Making Families’ Most Important Financial Decision Safe and Simple

For most middle class families, buying a home is the most important financial decision they will ever make. Unfortunately, in the lead-up to the foreclosure crisis, too many borrowers were steered into predatory or unsafe mortgages that they could not afford or understand – often a result of confusing mortgage forms, conflicts of interest in the lending process, hidden fees, and complex products. This is why President Obama took unprecedented steps to strengthen consumer protection and to ensure that mortgages are safe, sustainable and simple to understand. 

The President fought for and signed into law the strongest consumer protections in history with the Dodd-Frank Act.  The Dodd-Frank Act created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and tasked it with one job: to protect families when making financial decisions. The first-ever independent consumer watchdog, the CFPB protects middle class families by making it safer and simpler to apply for a mortgage and know that it is sustainable.  To this end, the CFPB has done the following:

  • Required lenders to evaluate a borrower’s ability to repay their loan, so homeownership can once again help families build long-term wealth.
  • Prohibited lenders from paying bonuses for putting borrowers into more expensive loans.
  • Created rules to ensure borrowers understand their current loans and receive timely and useful information about their monthly payments and any upcoming changes to their loan.
  • Set additional protections for those borrowers who are offered riskier, higher cost mortgages.
  • Established a consumer help hotline that has already addressed more than 175,000 complaints and helps keep CFPB informed of new problems facing families so it can better address new challenges. 

While these unprecedented consumer protections are making a big difference, more can be done to protect middle class families.  That is why the President supports the CFPB in finalizing its simplified mortgage disclosure forms, is calling for improved rules that encourage lenders to care more about borrower success, and made clear that any future housing finance system must ensure a level playing field for community-based banks and financial institutions so borrowers can work with the lender that is right for them. 

  • Ensure All Prospective Borrowers Receive a Single, Simple Three-Page Mortgage Disclosure Form.  The CFPB has made significant progress in developing new simplified mortgage disclosures forms that will make it easier for families to make the most informed decisions when purchasing a home.  A form at closing should be short and simple, avoid fine print, and highlight the key facts any potential homeowner should know before they take out a mortgage. If these objectives could be met in a form of no more than 3 pages, the simplification would help millions of middle class families make informed homeownership decisions.  The President strongly supports this important work and encourages CFPB to move with speed at finalizing these forms.
  • Increase Incentives for Lenders to Deliver High Quality Loans and Products. Rules should be established and improved that encourage mortgage lenders to care more about the success of their borrowers.
    • Lenders should be required to have a clear process in place to help borrowers stay in their homes where it is the best economic outcome for the family and lender.
    • The CFPB and other regulators should help track and rate originator and servicer performance to increase transparency and accountability, as well as improve borrower access to information about their lender.
  • Level Playing Field for Community-Based Banks and Financial Institutions so Borrowers Can Work with the Lender That’s Right for Them.  Any future housing finance system must ensure there is a level playing field for small lenders.  Community-based lenders are often best positioned to provide the optimal mortgage product and services to local borrowers.  These community banks and credit unions must be given the same opportunity to compete in any future system to ensure that consumers have the broadest number of options and can work with the lenders that is best for them.   

Confirming Mel Watt will Provide Certainty and Leadership during This Key Phase

  • Calling on Congress to Swiftly Confirm the President’s FHFA Director Nominee Mel Watt to Further Accelerate Efforts toward Common Sense Housing Finance Reform:  Our mortgage finance system needs a confirmed and permanent FHFA Director to help wind down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on a responsible timeline and transition towards a safe and sound future system of housing finance.  Over his more than twenty years on the House Financial Services and Judiciary Committees, Watt has developed a proven track record of fighting to rein in deceptive mortgage lenders, protecting consumers from abusive financial practices, and working across the aisle to find common ground on critical issues.  That is why Democrats and Republicans who know him best from his home state of North Carolina, including Senator Richard Burr, Erskine Bowles, and Hugh McColl, strongly support his nomination. Mel Watt is a distinguished member of Congress, an accomplished lawyer, and a supremely qualified candidate to lead the FHFA in these critical times. Confirming him will provide certainty and leadership at FHFA while it plays a critical role in winding down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. He deserves a straight up or down vote.

The President’s Policies Helped Stabilize a Housing Market in Free Fall

When President Obama took office, our housing market was in free-fall. The President immediately took unprecedented steps to stabilize our housing market and protect the middle class, and later, when there was a log jam in Congress, the President took a number of significant administrative and enforcement actions that helped heal the housing market. While more work remains, the important actions by the President helped millions of families stay in their homes, save money on their mortgages, and turn their communities around. 

When the President Took Office, Home Values Were Plunging and Foreclosures Were at Record Highs:  

  • Home prices had fallen by 19% since a year earlier by one important measure, the largest one year drop in home prices ever measured.
  • Housing starts had plummeted nearly 80% from their peak to a level below 500,000.
  • Both new and existing home sales were near all-time lows under 500,000 and 4 million respectively
  • Millions of homeowners faced distress, with around three million seriously delinquent borrowers.
  • More than 100,000 construction jobs were being lost each month, with the fall in residential construction reducing GDP by 1% in the prior year.

The Administration Took Immediate Action to Stabilize and Heal Our Housing Market: Within a month of taking office, the President launched a series of housing initiatives to help millions of homeowners stay in their homes or transition into sustainable housing opportunities. This relief was provided through a combination of direct assistance and through setting important industry standards and templates that transformed the way the industry responded to the crisis.

  • Mortgage modification initiatives led to almost 7 million homeowners getting government or private sector relief – nearly twice as many as those who went through foreclosure during the Obama Presidency. The Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) has helped over 1.2 million borrowers through permanent loan modifications.  Combined with 1.9 million Federal Housing Administration (FHA) homeowner interventions and the 3.7 million helped through private lender programs largely modeled after the HAMP template, almost 7 million homeowners have been helped in one way or another.
  • Making Home Affordable (MHA) programs have also helped hundreds of thousands of underwater homeowners avoid foreclosure by allowing them to sell their home or reduce payments on or extinguish their second lien.
  • The Hardest Hit Fund (HHF) has committed $7.6 billion in resources to states to develop locally-tailored programs that assist struggling homeowners in their communities, helping over 100,000 borrowers with programs that reduce principal or help them bridge unemployment.
  • HUD’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) has allocated $7 billion to thousands of neighborhoods to address foreclosed and abandoned homes.  NSP is projected to support close to 90,000 jobs and treat over 100,000 properties – including those with affordable rental and homeownership units – creating a positive ripple effect throughout communities.  Seventy-five percent of neighborhoods with concentrated NSP investments have seen vacancies decline and 72% have seen home prices increase compared to similarly distressed neighborhoods without the NSP investment.
  • HUD’s Tax Credit Assistance Program and Treasury’s Credit Exchange Program protected the affordable rental housing market during the economic crisis, ensuring that development continued when the credit markets froze and saving tens of thousands of construction jobs in low-income communities. 
  • The Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Rehousing program ensured that 1.3 million Americans who were homeless or at risk of becoming homeless due to the financial crisis were either promptly rehoused or provided assistance to remain housed.  As a consequence of HPRP and investments in affordable rental housing, this economic downturn saw no net increase in families experiencing homelessness. And for our returning heroes, through creative partnerships and evidence based interventions, VA and HUD have reduced the number of veterans experiencing homelessness by 18% from 2010 to 2012.  
  • As part of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Administration pushed for the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to better protect borrowers. The CFPB is in turn transforming the consumer lending landscape and developing important new standards and protections to make buying a home a much simpler and safer process.
  • HUD launched an Office of Housing Counseling and worked with HUD- approved housing counselors to assist more than 9 million families in making smart and informed financial decisions.

When Congress Would Not Act, the President Did: When Congress stalled in providing additional needed relief to help stabilize and heal the housing market, the Administration took further administrative and enforcement actions.

  • Extended the minimum time unemployed borrowers can delay payments on their mortgages from 3 months to 12 months while they are looking for a job.
  • Worked with regulators to expand refinancing for underwater borrowers through the Home Affordable Refinancing Program (HARP), nearly tripling the number of families who received refinancings from 400,000 in 2011 to 1.1 million in 2012 and bringing the total to more than 2.6 million through May 2013. 
  • Tripled incentives for principal reduction in HAMP to help underwater homeowners. In recent months, approximately 70% of HAMP modifications for eligible borrowers include principal reduction. Only 1% of all modifications prior to HAMP included principal reduction.
  • Helped responsible families capitalize on low interest rates when refinancing or buying a home by stabilizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and strengthening the Federal Housing Administration. FHA alone has insured more than half of the loans for first-time homebuyers during the recovery. 
  • Continued to help state and local housing finance agencies through the New Issue Bond Program) to extend affordable mortgage credit to more than 135,000 working families and enable the development and rehabilitation of 40,000 affordable rental units.
  • Partnered with 3,000 American Jobs Centers to provide housing counseling to help unemployed homeowners avoid foreclosure.
  • Partnered with NeighborWorks to help homeowners complete and submit applications for assistance through the Making Home Affordable Program, which includes HAMP.
  • Negotiated the National Mortgage Servicing Settlement with 49 state Attorneys General to hold banks accountable and for assisting struggling homeowners. The Settlement has provided over 600,000 homeowners more than $50 billion in committed relief.
  • Worked with states to use HHF for blight elimination. Michigan plans to use $100 million of its existing HHF allocation for demolition and greening of blighted properties, and the Administration is also working with Ohio to implement a similar plan.
  • The Department of Justice (DOJ) has brought over 1,600 mortgage fraud cases against almost 3,000 defendants over the last three fiscal years, due in part to the efforts of the Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) Working Group, a joint federal and state initiative under the President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. HUD and DOJ have also pursued and won landmark Fair Housing Act settlements that have put money in the pockets of families that suffered from unfair lending practices. In fact, DOJ collected more money for victims of housing discrimination in the last fiscal year, by over $250 million, than the monetary relief obtained in the previous 23 years combined.

The President’s Policies are Beginning to Work, and the Housing Market is Coming Back: Helped by the Administration’s programs, the housing markets are turning around. Over the past year and a half, prices are rising, foreclosures and distressed sales are declining, non-distressed sales are increasing, and construction jobs are coming back. This is helping bring millions of families out from being underwater and is putting wealth back in the pockets of families.

  • Home prices are rising at the fastest pace in seven years, up more than 12% in the past year. Rising prices have brought 2.4 million families out from being underwater in the last 5 quarters.
  • Home building is coming back, leading to an upswing in construction jobs. Recent housing starts are up roughly 75% from their April 2009 bottom of 478,000, while the number of residential construction jobs is on the rebound.
  • Existing home sales have increased 47.2% from their crisis low and are approaching historical norms of ~5.0 million units.
  • Housing wealth is growing again, with owners’ equity up $2.8 trillion since hitting a low at the beginning of 2009. This in turn has contributed to increased economic activity through consumer spending, small business investment, and more.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by the Press Secretary on the Inauguration of the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran

On the occasion of Dr. Hojjatoleslam Hassan Rouhani’s inauguration today as the Islamic Republic of Iran’s seventh president, we again congratulate the Iranian people for making their voices heard during Iran’s election. We note that President Rouhani recognized his election represented a call by the Iranian people for change, and we hope the new Iranian government will heed the will of the voters by making choices that will lead to a better life for the Iranian people. The inauguration of President Rouhani presents an opportunity for Iran to act quickly to resolve the international community’s deep concerns over Iran’s nuclear program. Should this new government choose to engage substantively and seriously to meet its international obligations and find a peaceful solution to this issue, it will find a willing partner in the United States.

The White House

Office of the Vice President

Readout of Principals Committee Meeting on Current Threat

Early this week, the President instructed his National Security team to take all appropriate steps to protect the American people in light of a potential threat occurring in or emanating from the Arabian Peninsula. Given the nature of the potential threat, throughout the week, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Lisa Monaco has held regular meetings with relevant members of the interagency to ensure the U.S. Government is taking those appropriate steps. This afternoon, National Security Advisor Rice chaired a meeting with the Principals Committee to further review the situation and follow-up actions. The President has received frequent briefings over the last week on all aspects of the potential threat and our preparedness measures. After today's Principals meeting, the President was again briefed by Amb. Rice and Ms. Monaco.

Attendees at today’s meeting included:

White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough
National Security Advisor Susan Rice
Deputy National Security Advisor Tony Blinken
Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Lisa Monaco
Deputy National Security Advisor to the Vice President Jeff Prescott
Secretary of State John Kerry
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey
U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power
Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper
Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Robert Mueller
Director of the Central Intelligence Agency John Brennan
Director of the National Security Agency Keith Alexander
Director of the National Counterterrorism Center Matthew Olsen
Acting Assistant Attorney General John Carlin

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Readout of Principals Committee Meeting on Current Threat

Early this week, the President instructed his National Security team to take all appropriate steps to protect the American people in light of a potential threat occurring in or emanating from the Arabian Peninsula. Given the nature of the potential threat, throughout the week, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Lisa Monaco has held regular meetings with relevant members of the interagency to ensure the U.S. Government is taking those appropriate steps. This afternoon, National Security Advisor Rice chaired a meeting with the Principals Committee to further review the situation and follow-up actions. The President has received frequent briefings over the last week on all aspects of the potential threat and our preparedness measures. After today's Principals meeting, the President was again briefed by Amb. Rice and Ms. Monaco.
 
Attendees at today’s meeting included:
 
White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough
National Security Advisor Susan Rice
Deputy National Security Advisor Tony Blinken
Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Lisa Monaco
Deputy National Security Advisor to the Vice President Jeff Prescott
Secretary of State John Kerry
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey
U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power
Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper
Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Robert Mueller
Director of the Central Intelligence Agency John Brennan
Director of the National Security Agency Keith Alexander
Director of the National Counterterrorism Center Matthew Olsen
Acting Assistant Attorney General John Carlin

The White House

Office of the Vice President

Readout of Vice President Biden’s Call with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki

Vice President Biden spoke with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki today. The Vice President expressed his condolences on behalf of the American people for the victims of terrorist violence in Iraq. Both leaders confirmed the need to strengthen bilateral cooperation under the Strategic Framework Agreement to support Iraq's efforts in finding those responsible for the recent attacks and bringing them to justice. The Vice President emphasized that al Qaeda remains a shared enemy of Iraq, the United States, and the entire world. He also noted recent improvements in the political atmosphere and encouraged continued outreach to national and local leaders across the political spectrum. Regarding the situation in Syria, the two leaders discussed the importance of working together to isolate extremists on all sides of the conflict there.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Weekly Address: Securing a Better Bargain for the Middle Class

WASHINGTON, DC— In this week’s address, President Obama told the American people that his plan for creating a better bargain for the middle class builds on the progress we’ve made, fighting our way back from the worst economic recession of our lifetimes. The President underscored the need for Congress to end the logjam in Washington and act on his plan that strengthens the cornerstones of what it means to be middle class in America: a good job, a home that is your own, affordable health care, and a secure retirement.

The audio of the address and video of the address will be available online at www.whitehouse.gov at 6:00 a.m. ET, August 3, 2013.

Remarks of President Barack Obama
Weekly Address
The White House
August 3, 2013

Hi, everybody.  This week, I went down to an Amazon warehouse in Tennessee to talk more about what we need to do to secure a better bargain for the middle class – to make sure that anyone who works hard can get ahead in the 21st century economy.

Over the past four and a half years, we’ve fought our way back from the worst recession of our lifetimes and begun to lay a foundation for stronger, more durable economic growth.  Today, our businesses have created 7.3 million new jobs over the last 41 months.  We now sell more products made in America to the rest of the world than ever before.  Health care costs are growing at the slowest rate in 50 years, and our deficits are falling at the fastest rate in 60 years.

But as any middle-class family will tell you, we’re not where we need to be yet.  Even before the crisis hit, we were living through a decade where a few at the top were doing better and better, while most families were working harder and harder just to get by.

Reversing this trend must be Washington’s highest priority.  It’s certainly mine.  But too often over the past two years, Washington has taken its eye off the ball.  They’ve allowed an endless parade of political posturing and phony scandals to distract from growing our economy and strengthening the middle class.

That’s why I’m laying out my ideas for how we can build on the cornerstones of what it means to be middle class in America.  A good education.  A home of your own.  Health care when you get sick.  A secure retirement even if you’re not rich.  And the most important cornerstone of all: a good job in a durable, growing industry.

When it comes to creating more good jobs that pay decent wages, the problem is not a lack of ideas.  Plenty of independent economists, business owners and people from both parties agree on what we have to do.  I proposed many of these ideas two years ago in the American Jobs Act.  And this week, I put forward common-sense proposals for how we can create more jobs in manufacturing; in wind, solar and natural gas; and by rebuilding America’s infrastructure.

What we’re lacking is action from Washington.  And that’s why, in addition to proposing ideas that we know will grow our economy, I’ve also put forward a strategy for breaking through the Washington logjam – a “grand bargain” for the middle class.

I’m willing to work with Republicans to simplify our tax code for businesses large and small, but only if we take the money we save by transitioning to a simpler tax system and make a significant investment in creating good, middle-class jobs.  We can put construction workers back on the job rebuilding our infrastructure.  We can boost manufacturing, so more American companies can sell their products around the world.  And we can help our community colleges arm our workers with the skills they need in a global economy – all without adding a dime to the deficit.

I’ll keep laying out my ideas to give the middle class a better shot in the 21st century, and I’ll keep reaching out to Republicans for theirs.  But gutting critical investments in our future and threatening national default on the bills that Congress has already racked up – that’s not an economic plan.  Denying health care to millions of Americans, or shutting down the government just because I’m for keeping it open – that won’t help the middle class. 

The truth is, there are no gimmicks when it comes to creating jobs.  There are no tricks to grow the economy.  Reversing the long erosion of middle-class security in this country won’t be easy.  But if we work together and take a few bold steps – and if Washington is willing to set aside politics and focus on what really matters – we can grow our economy and give the middle class a better bargain.  And together, we can make this country a place where everyone who works hard can get ahead.

Thanks, and have a great weekend.

###

 

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama Signs Vermont Disaster Declaration

The President today declared a major disaster exists in the State of Vermont and ordered federal aid to supplement state and local recovery efforts in the area affected by severe storms and flooding during the period of June 25 to July 11, 2013.

Federal funding is available to state and eligible local governments and certain private nonprofit organizations on a cost-sharing basis for emergency work and the repair or replacement of facilities damaged by the severe storms and flooding in the counties of Caledonia, Chittenden, Orange, Orleans, Rutland, Washington, and Windsor. 

Federal funding is also available on a cost-sharing basis for hazard mitigation measures statewide.

W. Craig Fugate, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Homeland Security, named Mark H. Landry as the Federal Coordinating Officer for federal recovery operations in the affected area.

FEMA said additional designations may be made at a later date if requested by the state and warranted by the results of further damage assessments.