The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama Honors Outstanding Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentors

WASHINGTON, DC - President Obama today named fourteen individuals and one organization as the newest recipients of the Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentoring (PAESMEM). These mentors will receive their awards at a White House ceremony later this year.

The Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentoring is awarded by the White House to individuals and organizations to recognize the crucial role that mentoring plays in the academic and personal development of students studying science and engineering—particularly those who belong to groups that are underrepresented in these fields. By offering their expertise and encouragement, mentors help prepare the next generation of scientists and engineers while ensuring that tomorrow’s innovators represent a diverse pool of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics talent throughout the United States.

Candidates for the award are nominated by colleagues, administrators, and students in their home institutions or through professional affiliations. Candidates may also self-nominate. Their mentoring can involve students at any grade level from elementary through graduate school and professional development mentoring of early career scientists. In addition to being honored at the White House, recipients receive awards of $10,000 from the National Science Foundation. The mentors and organizations announced today represent the winners for 2012 and 2013.

“These educators are helping to cultivate America’s future scientists, engineers and mathematicians,” President Obama said. “They open new worlds to their students, and give them the encouragement they need to learn, discover and innovate. That’s transforming those students’ futures, and our nation’s future, too.”

The latest set of individuals and organizations receiving the Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentoring are:

• Sheila M. Humphreys, University of California, Berkeley
• Raymond L. Johnson, University of Maryland, College Park
• Murty S. Kambhampati, Southern University at New Orleans
• Gary S. May, Dean, Georgia Institute of Technology
• Elizabeth A. Parry, North Carolina State University
• Tilak Ratnanather, The Johns Hopkins University
• John Brooks Slaughter, University of Southern California
• GeoFORCE Texas, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin
• Luis Colón, State University of New York at Buffalo
• Anne E. Donnelly, University of Florida
• Lorraine Fleming, Howard University
• John Matsui, University of California, Berkeley
• Beth Olivares, University of Rochester
• Sandra Petersen, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
• Julio Soto, San Jose State University

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by the President on the Retirement of Senator Harry Reid

Harry Reid is a fighter. In his five terms as a U.S. Senator, Harry has fought for good jobs, a safer environment for our kids, and affordable health care for all. He's never backed down from a tough decision, or been afraid to choose what is right over what is easy. Time and time again, Harry stood up to special interests and made sure every one of his constituents had a voice in their nation's capital.

Above all else, Harry has fought for the people of his beloved state of Nevada. The son of a miner and a maid from the tiny town of Searchlight, he never forgot where he came from, and he never stopped working to give everyone who works hard the same shot at success that he had.

As the leader of the Senate Democrats during my time in office, Harry has become not only an ally, but a friend. I'm proud of all we have accomplished together, and I know the Senate will not be the same without him. I look forward to working with him to keep fighting for every American over the next two years, and Michelle and I wish him and Landra well in whatever the future holds.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by the Press Secretary on the Passage of the Senate Budget

Following in the footsteps of their House colleagues, Senate Republicans today voted in favor of a budget that relies on top-down economics and gimmicks.  The Senate Republican budget refuses to ask the wealthy to contribute a single dollar to deficit reduction, putting the entire burden on the middle-class, seniors, low-income children and families, and national security.  Senate Republicans voted in favor of locking in draconian sequestration cuts to investments in the middle class like education, job training and manufacturing and also failed to responsibly fund our national security, opting instead for budget gimmicks, an approach that now faces procedural hurdles put in place by their own party.  

Meanwhile, the President has a plan to bring middle class economics into the 21st Century.  The President’s Budget builds on the progress we’ve made and shows what we can do if we invest in America's future, and end sequestration, by cutting inefficient spending and reforming our broken tax code to make sure everyone pays their fair share. It lays out a strategy to strengthen our middle class with investments in research, education, training, and infrastructure, while also fulfilling our most basic responsibility to keep Americans safe.

In 2013 Republicans came to the negotiating table and ultimately chose the responsible path by supporting the Murray-Ryan agreement, which reversed harmful sequestration cuts to both defense and non-defense equally, dollar for dollar.  Last night, Senators from both parties came together to call for building on that approach this year and to support paying for sequester relief with both spending and tax reforms.  The President has been clear that he will not accept a budget that locks in sequestration or one that increases funding for our national security without providing matching increases in funding for our economic security.  The Administration will continue to abide by these principles moving forward.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

FACT SHEET: The Partnerships for Opportunity and Workforce and Economic Revitalization (POWER) Initiative

The United States is undergoing a rapid energy transformation, particularly in the power sector. Booming natural gas production, declining costs for renewable energy, increases in energy efficiency, flattening electricity demand, and updated clean air standards are changing the way electricity is generated and used across the country. These trends are producing cleaner air and healthier communities, and spurring new jobs and industries. At the same time, they are impacting workers and communities who have relied on the coal industry as a source of good jobs and economic prosperity, particularly in Appalachia, where competition with other coal basins provides additional pressure.

To help these communities adapt to the changing energy landscape and build a better future, the President’s FY 2016 Budget proposed the POWER+ Plan.  The POWER+ Plan invests in workers and jobs, addresses important legacy costs in coal country, and drives development of coal technology.

This year, the Administration will make a down payment on the POWER+ Plan by beginning implementation of a key part of the Plan - the Partnerships for Opportunity and Workforce and Economic Revitalization (POWER) initiative.  POWER will be a coordinated effort, involving multiple federal agencies, with the goal of effectively aligning, leveraging, and targeting a range of federal economic and workforce development programs and resources to assist communities negatively impacted by changes in the coal industry and power sector. The POWER initiative will coordinate use of appropriated FY 2015 funds from a range of federal programs, while following the relevant statutory and regulatory requirements for each program.

The POWER initiative will award grants on two parallel tracks to partnerships anchored in impacted communities. These grants will help communities organize themselves to respond on behalf of affected workers and businesses, develop comprehensive strategic plans that chart their economic future, and execute coordinated economic and workforce development activities based on their strategic plans.  These activities will seek to: (1) diversify economies; (2) create jobs in new or existing industries; (3) attract new sources of job-creating investment; (4) and provide a range of workforce services and skills training, including work-based learning opportunities, resulting in industry-recognized credentials for high-quality, in-demand jobs.

These efforts in FY 2015 will lay the groundwork for a multi-year initiative with grants awarded in future years based on the availability of appropriations.  The President’s FY 2016 Budget includes over $55 million for economic and workforce development strategies across a number of federal programs, which would be used to continue and expand the POWER initiative after it begins this year.

POWER Funding and Administrative Structure

POWER will award grants using $28-$38 million in FY 2015 funds from the Department of Commerce (DOC), Department of Labor (DOL), Small Business Administration (SBA), and the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC).  The grants will be designed to assist communities regardless of their different levels of capacity, planning and preparation.  A two-track grant-making process is described below, with an understanding that some communities will require some form of pre-planning technical assistance in order to effectively apply for either planning or implementation grants. 

Track #1: Planning Grants

DOC and DOL will award planning grants to communities that have been or will be impacted by coal mining and coal power plant employment loss (or layoffs in the manufacturing or transportation logistics supply chains of either) and that do not have robust and/or recent comprehensive and integrated economic development strategic plans in place.  Grant funds would be available to help organize community stakeholders, analyze and inventory community assets, evaluate needs and resources, and develop comprehensive economic development strategic plans.  Grants would also go to State Workforce Agencies for in-depth labor market analysis and workforce development and dislocated worker planning connected with the provision of training and employment services.

Funding Sources:

  • DOC – Economic Development Administration (EDA), Assistance to Coal Communities, Economic Adjustment Assistance, and Partnership Planning
  • DOL – Employment and Training Administration (ETA), Dislocated Worker National Emergency Grants [1]

Track #2: Implementation Grants

DOC, DOL, SBA, and ARC will award implementation grants to communities that have been impacted by coal mining and coal power plant employment loss (or layoffs in the manufacturing or transportation logistics supply chains of either) and that have already done robust strategic planning.  Grants would support the implementation of linked economic and workforce development strategies to develop high-potential industry clusters, assist impacted communities to accelerate job creation by leveraging local assets, train and place workers in family-supporting, high-demand jobs (including Registered Apprenticeship and other on-the-job training models), and to create linkages that drive regional economic growth.

Funding Sources:

  • DOC -- EDA, Assistance to Coal Communities, Economic Adjustment Assistance, and Partnership Planning (up to $15 million total for both grant making tracks)
  • DOL – Employment and Training Administration (ETA), Dislocated Worker National Emergency Grants (up to $10-20 million total for both grant making tracks)
  • SBA, Regional Innovation Clusters and Growth Accelerators (up to $3 million combined[2])
  • ARC, Technical Assistance and Demonstration Projects (up to $500 thousand for applicants from its region)

The implementation grants will be awarded through a single POWER Federal Funding Opportunity (FFO) announcement that combines funding opportunities and activities and services from different programs and agencies but maintains the eligibility rules, permitted activities, and reporting requirements of the originating program and funding.  Partnerships will be encouraged to apply for more than one funding source where appropriate, but that will not be required.

Additional Federal Agency Participation

A number of other federal agencies will also participate in the POWER initiative by providing technical assistance and education and outreach to POWER partnerships, coordination with existing resources, and/or preference points for agency funding for applications from the partnerships.  The additional agencies will include:

  • USDA-Rural Business Cooperative Service
  • Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
  • Department of Energy
  • Department of Treasury, Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund
  • DOC, SelectUSA
  • DOC, NIST-Manufacturing Extension Partnerships
  • Corporation for National and Community Service
  • Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

Administration

EDA will be the administrative home for POWER given the economic development thrust of this initiative.  EDA will manage the joint FFO announcement and overall process of competitive solicitation, provide a single staff point of federal contact (with staffing assistance from other participating agencies when needed) for the selected partnerships, and coordinate cross-agency activities at the regional level that direct additional federal resources to impacted communities.  Grant selection, awards and execution will be managed by each authorized agency, with EDA playing a coordination role.

POWER Partnerships

Eligibility for applicants for POWER awards will be dictated by the sources of the funds.  Regardless of the primary applicant for Implementation Grants, POWER will encourage a broader partnership to participate, including (but not limited to) representatives from government, economic development organizations, workforce development boards, community and technical colleges, businesses, labor unions, and community groups.

Timeline

April/May, 2015: Track #1 POWER Planning Grant announcement issued

April/May, 2015:  Track #2 POWER Implementation Grant FFO issued

July/August, 2015: POWER Planning and Implementation Grant awards ready to announce



[1] The DOL-ETA will solicit applications for planning activities with implementation activities as part of the combined Implementation Grant FFO

[2] Regional Innovation Clusters funding will be $500,000 for the first year for one partnership, with an option to extend funding by another $2 million over the next four years.

 

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

FACT SHEET: Obama Administration Releases National Action Plan to Combat Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria

Today, the White House released a comprehensive plan that identifies critical actions to be taken by key Federal departments and agencies to combat the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.  The National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria, which was developed by the interagency Task Force for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in response to Executive Order 13676: Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria, outlines steps for implementing the National Strategy on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and addressing the policy recommendations of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) report on Combating Antibiotic Resistance.

Antibiotics have been a critical public health tool since the discovery of penicillin in 1928, saving the lives of millions of people around the world.  The emergence of drug resistance in bacteria is undermining our ability to treat bacterial infections and perform a range of modern medical procedures, including chemotherapy, surgery, dialysis, and organ transplantation.  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that drug-resistant bacteria cause 23,000 deaths and 2 million illnesses each year in the United States. Antibiotic resistance also threatens animal health, agriculture, and the economy.

The National Action Plan provides a roadmap to guide the Nation in rising to the challenge of antibiotic resistance and potentially saving thousands of lives.  The Action Plan outlines Federal activities over the next five years to enhance domestic and international capacity to prevent and contain outbreaks of antibiotic-resistant infections; maintain the efficacy of current and new antibiotics; and develop and deploy next-generation diagnostics, antibiotics, vaccines, and other therapeutics.  These activities are consistent with investments in the President’s FY 2016 Budget, which nearly doubles the amount of Federal funding for combating and preventing antibiotic resistance to more than $1.2 billion.

Implementation of the Action Plan will require the sustained, coordinated, and complementary efforts of individuals and groups around the world, including public and private sector partners, healthcare providers, healthcare leaders, veterinarians, agriculture industry leaders, manufacturers, policymakers, and patients.  Efforts carried out as part of the Action Plan will help the Federal government curb the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria with the goal of saving lives.

To provide advice, information, and recommendations regarding programs and policies intended to support and evaluate the implementation of Executive Order 13676, including the National Strategy for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and the National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria, the Secretary of Health and Human Services established the Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (Advisory Council). HHS is currently seeking nominations of individuals who are interested in being considered for appointment to the Advisory Council. 

National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria

The Action Plan is organized around five goals for collaborative action by the U.S. Government, in partnership with foreign governments, individuals, and organizations aiming to strengthen healthcare, public health, veterinary medicine, agriculture, food safety, and research and manufacturing.  Aggressive action will move the nation towards major reductions in the incidence of urgent and serious drug-resistant threats.

These goals are:
  • Slow the Emergence of Resistant Bacteria and Prevent the Spread of Resistant Infections. 
  • Strengthen National One-Health Surveillance Efforts to Combat Resistance,
  • Advance Development and Use of Rapid and Innovative Diagnostic Tests for Identification and Characterization of Resistant Bacteria.
  • Accelerate Basic and Applied Research and Development for New Antibiotics, Other Therapeutics, and Vaccines.
  • Improve International Collaboration and Capacities for Antibiotic Resistance Prevention, Surveillance, Control, and Antibiotic Research and Development.
 

Slow the Emergence of Resistant Bacteria and
Prevent the Spread of Resistant Infections

Judicious use of antibiotics in healthcare and agricultural settings is essential to slow the emergence of resistance and extend the useful lifetime of effective antibiotics.  The CDC estimates that up to half of all human antibiotic use is unnecessary or inappropriate. The Action Plan includes activities to foster improvements in the appropriate use of antibiotics (i.e., antibiotic stewardship) by improving prescribing practices across all healthcare settings. , preventing the spread of drug-resistant threats in healthcare facilities and communities, and continuing to eliminate the use of medically-important antibiotics for growth promotion in animals.

By 2020, significant outcomes in this area will include:
  • Establishment of antimicrobial stewardship programs in all acute care hospitals and improved antimicrobial stewardship across all healthcare settings.
  • Reduction of inappropriate antibiotic use by 50% in outpatient settings and by 20% in inpatient settings.
  • Establishment of State Antibiotic Resistance (AR) Prevention (Protect) Programs in all 50 states to monitor regionally important multi-drug resistant organisms and provide feedback and technical assistance to health care facilities.
  • Elimination of the use of medically-important antibiotics for growth promotion in food-producing animals.
 

Strengthen National-Surveillance Efforts for Resistant Bacteria

The “One-Health” approach to disease surveillance for human and animal pathogens is critical to combat antibiotic resistance.  Improved detection and control of antibiotic resistance in human and animal pathogens will be achieved through a “One-Health” approach to disease surveillance that integrates data from multiple monitoring networks.  This approach will significantly increase the currently very limited data and provide high-quality information, including detailed genomic data, necessary to track resistant bacteria in diverse settings in a timely fashion.

By 2020, significant outcomes in this area will include:
  • Creation of a regional public health network—the Detect Network of AR Regional Laboratories—for resistance testing, a specimen repository for resistant bacterial strains, and a National Sequence Database of Resistant Pathogens.
  • Routine reporting of antibiotic use and resistance data to National Health Safety Network (NHSN) by 95% of Medicare-eligible hospitals, as well as by Department of Defense  and Veterans Affairs healthcare facilities.
  • Routine testing of zoonotic and animal pathogens for antibiotic susceptibility at ten to twenty National Animal Health Laboratory Network (NAHLN) and Veterinary Laboratory Investigation and Response Network (Vet-LIRN) member laboratories, using standardized testing methods and data sharing practices.
 

Advance Development and Use of Rapid and Innovative Diagnostic Tests for Identification and Characterization of Resistant Bacteria

With the support of funding agencies such as the National Institutes of Health, today’s researchers are taking advantage of new technologies to develop rapid “point-of-need” diagnostic tests that can be used during a healthcare visit to distinguish between viral and bacterial infections and identify bacterial drug susceptibilities — an innovation that could significantly reduce unnecessary antibiotic use.  The availability of new rapid diagnostic tests, combined with ongoing use of culture-based assays to identify new resistance mechanisms, will advance the detection and control of resistant bacteria.

By 2020, significant outcomes in this area will include:
  • Development and dissemination of authorized point-of-need diagnostic tests that rapidly distinguish between bacterial and viral infections.
  • Validation of diagnostic tests that rapidly determine the antibiotic resistance profiles of bacteria of public health concern.
 

Accelerate Basic and Applied Research and Development for
New Antibiotics, Other Therapeutics, and Vaccines

Antibiotics that lose their effectiveness for treating human disease through antibiotic resistance must be replaced with new drugs; alternatives to antibiotics are also needed in veterinary medicine.  The Action Plan will boost basic scientific research, attract greater private investment, and facilitate clinical trials in order to advance the discovery and development of new antibiotics and alternative therapies to combat resistance.

By 2020, significant outcomes in this area will include:
  • Characterization of the gut microbiome—the communities of microorganisms that live within the gastrointestinal tract—of at least one animal species raised for food.  This outcome will help us understand how antibiotic treatments disrupt normal gut bacteria and how animal growth might be promoted—and bacterial diseases might be treated—without using antibiotics.
  • Advancement of at least two new antibiotic drug candidates, non-traditional therapeutics, and/or vaccines from pre-clinical testing to clinical trials for treatment or prevention of human disease.
  • Development of at least three new drug candidates or probiotic treatments as alternatives to antibiotics for promoting growth or preventing disease in animals.
  • Creation of a biopharmaceutical incubator—a consortium of academic, biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry partners—to promote innovation and increase the number of antibiotics and antibodies in the drug-development pipeline.
 

Improve International Collaboration and Capacities for
Antibiotic Resistance Prevention, Surveillance, Control, and
Antibiotic Research and Development

Antibiotic resistance is a global problem that requires global solutions.  The United States will engage with international ministries and institutions to strengthen national and international capacities to detect, monitor, analyze, and report antibiotic resistance; provide resources and incentives to spur the development of therapeutics and diagnostics for use in humans and animals; and strengthen regional networks and global partnerships that help prevent and control the emergence and spread of resistance.

By 2020, significant outcomes in this area will include:
  • Elevation of antibiotic resistance as an international priority for global health and security.
  • Enhanced capacity to identify antimicrobial resistant pathogens in more than 15 partner countries.
  • Establishment of a common U.S.-European Union (EU) system for sharing and analyzing bacterial resistance patterns for priority pathogens.
  • Development of a global database to collect harmonized quantitative data on the use of antibacterial agents in animals.
  • Development of national plans to combat antibiotic resistance and improve antibiotic stewardship in low- and middle-income countries.
  • Strengthened regulatory and supply chain systems that assure the quality, safety, and efficacy of antibiotics used in low- and middle-income countries.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President on Middle Class Economics

Lawson State Community College
Birmingham, Alabama
 
3:27 P.M. CDT
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, Alabama!  (Applause.)  Hello, Lawson State Community College!  (Applause.)  Well, it's good to be here.  Thank you so much.  
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  We love you!
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I love you back!  I do!  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Everybody, have a seat.  Have a seat.  I'm going to talk for a second.  Everybody please give Ollie a big round of applause, please.  (Applause.)  I felt a little bad because Ollie said “a man who needs no introduction,” so I started walking out. (Laughter.)  Then it turned out she had a little introduction.  (Laughter.)  But it is wonderful to be here.
 
Let me just say, first of all, thank you to Dr. Ward -- (applause) -- who is not only your president; we named him a White House “Champion of Change” for the very work he’s done here at Lawson State.  (Applause.)  We’ve got two outstanding public servants here as well -- Congresswoman Terri Sewell is here.  (Applause.)  Where’s Terri?  I don't even see her.  
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Over here!
 
THE PRESIDENT:  There she is -- she’s way over there.  And your Mayor, William Bell, is in the house.  (Applause.)      
 
So I’m here, Birmingham, to just acknowledge that I didn’t have UAB making it out of the first round.  (Laughter.)  
 
AUDIENCE:  Ooooh --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  My bracket is so busted.  (Laughter.)  But, UAB, that's a great accomplishment.  I want to congratulate them. (Applause.)  It's also great to be with students like those here at Lawson State, at community colleges.  (Applause.)  I'm proud of all of you.  I’m proud of you making this investment in yourselves.  What you’re doing takes effort and persistence.  And it takes faith in the idea that no matter how you started, no matter where you come from, no matter what zip code you were born in, in America if you work hard you can get ahead.  (Applause.)   
I think it was yesterday I saw a story where someone said that a visit from the President is a “potential game-changer” for the neighborhood.  I don't know if just one visit is a game-changer, but it's nice to be with you.  The real game-changers for any neighborhood, for any community, are the people there, the folks who, day in, day out, are doing the work, and raising families and participating in the community, and through their churches and faith institutions are trying to provide that optimism and that lift.  
 
And the young people who are here, you're the game-changers -- (applause) -- because what you're studying and your ability to then apply that learning, that's going to make a difference.  The love we put into our families and our communities every day, and embracing the joys of citizenship and participation -- that’s what is a game-changer.  That's what makes a difference.  
 
Now, I won't deny I can help a little bit.  (Applause.)  I can maybe make a little bit of difference.  And today, I want to talk about what we can do as a country to reward hard work, and keep the economy growing, and make sure that new jobs and opportunities exist. 
 
The good news is, right now, we’re on a 60-month streak of private sector job creation -- (applause.)  Sixty months, that's five years, that's a long time.  We've created 12 million new jobs.  Nationwide, the unemployment rate has fallen -- when I came into office, that first year it was 10 percent; now it's 5.5 percent.  (Applause.)  There are more job openings than at any time since 2001.  
 
Meanwhile, our high school graduation rate is up, at an all-time high.  (Applause.)  More than 16 million Americans have gained the security of health insurance.  (Applause.)  We’re producing more energy than ever before -- oil and gas, but also wind power and solar power.  Meanwhile, lower gas prices should save the typical family this year about $700 at the pump.  (Applause.)  And the good news is wages are even on the rise again, and that's going to help a lot of families.  (Applause.)  
 
So it’s been a long, hard road.  But thanks to the hard work of the American people, America is coming back.  So the question now is, where do we go from here?  Do we accept an economy where just a few people do really, really well?  Or are we going to keep building an economy that generates opportunity for everybody who’s willing to work?  (Applause.)    
 
And what I believe is, is that America does best when the middle class does better, and when ordinary folks who maybe were born into poverty are able to climb their way into the middle class, that’s good for everybody.  The economy grows best not from the top down, but from the bottom up and from the middle out.  (Applause.)  
 
So what we’ve been pushing is what I call middle-class economics -- the idea that the country does best when everybody has got a fair shot, everybody is doing their fair share, everybody is playing by the same rules.  And we want not only everybody to share in America’s success but contribute to it, because we know that if you field the team and only half the folks get to play, that team will be less successful.  If everybody is playing a part, that team is going to be more successful.  
 
So what does middle-class economics mean in this new economy? It means that every American has to have the tools to get ahead in a fast-paced, constantly changing global economy.  That means that we’ve got to make sure that working families feel more secure, that their paychecks can go a little farther, that they’re getting things like paid leave and child care not as luxuries but because they help support families, that we treat those things as priorities for working moms and working dads.  
 
It's time to follow the example of states and cities and companies that are raising America’s minimum wage.  That will make a difference.  (Applause.)  It means preparing Americans to earn good jobs and higher wages, which means every child getting a great education at the earliest age.  (Applause.)  Making college more affordable so young people can afford to go to college without getting burdened with debt.  (Applause.) 
     
It means working with businesses to provide apprenticeships and on-the-job training and other paths into the middle class.  And I want to bring down the cost of community college to zero.  (Applause.)  Two years of community college should be as free and universal as high school is today.  If we’ve got the best-trained workforce in the world, then businesses will come to Alabama. They’ll come to Birmingham.  They’ll come to America.  And we will succeed.  (Applause.)   
  
Middle-class economics means building the most competitive economy anywhere, so we can keep churning out high-wage jobs for the workers to fill.  I want to put more people back to work rebuilding our roads and our bridges, modern ports -- (applause) -- faster trains, faster Internet.  We should invest in those things.  They pay off many times over.
 
I want to invest in basic research so that jobs and industries of the future take root here because we’ve invented new products and new services, and innovated.  And we can pay for these investments without blowing up our deficits.  We just need to reform our tax code so it helps middle-class families get ahead instead of letting folks who already got a lot get ahead.  (Applause.)  
 
And I have to say, these ideas are not about ideology.  The reason I’ve proposed these ideas is because we know they work. 
 
Now, let me talk about Washington for a second.  (Laughter.) Let me just talk about Washington for a second.  The good news is that today the House of Representatives passed a bill.  (Laughter.)  No, no.  You think I'm joking.  I'm not.  (Laughter.)  It was a bipartisan bill designed to make sure that doctors in our Medicare system get paid on time; that the Children’s Health Insurance Program continues to work.  
 
I called the Speaker, John Boehner, and the Democratic Leader, Nancy Pelosi, and I said, congratulations, this is how Congress is supposed to work.  They came together; they compromised.  (Applause.)  They had a good idea.  They didn’t get everything they wanted.   They passed a bill.  Now the Senate hopefully will pass the bill, and I’ll get to sign it, and the American people will be better off for it.  And I thought, this is great.  Let’s do more of this.  (Applause.)  Let’s make it happen.  
 
So I want to give John Boehner and Nancy Pelosi credit.  They did good work today.  And they deserve credit, and the House of Representatives deserves credit for that.  (Applause.)
 
So that was the good news.  (Laughter.)  The bad news is the Republicans in Congress unveiled their budget, and it represents the opposite of middle-class economics, because it would hand out new tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires, let taxes go up for students and working families because it would eliminate their tax credits on a variety of things.  It would cut investments in education to the lowest level since the year 2000.
It would double the number of Americans without health insurance.
 
And so you look at it and you say, what are you trying to solve with this budget?  They say the reason they wanted this budget is because we've got to do this to eliminate deficits and debt.
 
Now, keep in mind, the deficit has come down by two-thirds since I've been President.  (Applause.)  It's come down by two-thirds.  And the budget I put forward would continue to keep deficits low.  
 
But let’s take them at their word.  They said they wanted to reduce the deficit.  Before the ink was even dry on the budget that they put forward that was already full of tax cuts for folks at the top, they rolled out their next big economic plan, which was another huge tax cut for folks at the top.  This one would cost $250 billion.  It would apply only to the top one-tenth of 1 percent of Americans.  
 
In Alabama, this new tax cut they’re proposing -- I’ve got to laugh because it would average $2 million per person in tax cuts, and it would apply to less than 50 people per year here in Alabama.
 
AUDIENCE:  Oooooh --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  So 50 people would get an average tax break of $2 million.  Not 50,000 people -- 50.  
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  “Fiddy.”
 
THE PRESIDENT:  “Fiddy.”  (Laughter and applause.)  
 
Now, what would lead you -- when you’re saying you’re concerned about the deficit, what would lead you to put in your budget and then propose right after your budget something like that?  I mean, did they look at the budget -- they already got tax cuts for the wealthy, for millionaires and billionaires, and then they say, you know what we forgot to put in here?  Another deficit-busting tax cut for the top one-tenth of 1 percent of Americans.  That’s what’s really going to move the country forward.  Is that what they were thinking?  I guess.  (Laughter.)   
I don’t think our top economic priority should be helping a tiny number of Americans who are already doing really, really well, and then asking everybody else to foot the bill.  (Applause.)  And keep in mind, one of the things about being President, you meet people from all walks of life.  You meet folks with very modest incomes.  You meet the wealthiest people in the world.  And let me just say, some of these folks at the very top, the top one-tenth of 1 percent, are wonderful people.  Warren Buffet is a great friend of mine.  They’ve done amazing things.  They’ve invested.  They’ve created businesses.  They deserve great success.  But they really don’t need a tax cut.  (Laughter.)  
 
And if you talk to them, they’ll tell you, “I already got a couple planes, I already got a boat -- (laughter) -- I already got five or six houses -- I’m okay.”  (Laughter.)  And the idea that you would do it at the same time as you’re eliminating tax credits for students or working families -- that doesn’t make sense.  
 
Our top priority should be helping everybody who works hard get ahead.  (Applause.)  It doesn’t mean everybody is going to be equal.  It doesn’t mean that we’re going to punish people who started businesses and taking risks.  They should be rewarded.  But we want to make sure everybody has a chance to do okay if they’re working hard.  
 
And that brings me to one of the main reasons that I’m here in Birmingham today.  One of the main ways to make sure paychecks to go farther is to make sure working families don’t get ripped off.  (Applause.)  Right?  And that’s why we’ve taken action to protect Americans from financial advisors who don’t necessarily have the interests of their clients at heart.  That’s why we’ve taken steps to protect student borrowers from unaffordable debt. We want them to know before they owe.  
 
It’s why, five years ago, we passed historic Wall Street reform to end this era of “too big to fail,” where banks on Wall Street, some of them would make reckless bets, and then everybody else would have to clean up after them.  And why we’ve been working to protect people so that they understand mortgages, and they don't buy homes they can't afford and end up in a situation not only hurting themselves, but hurting the financial system. 
 
And that's why, as part of this reform, we created an independent consumer watchdog with just one mission, and that is to look out for all of you.  And it’s called the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau -- or CFPB.  (Applause.)  Now, these folks -- the CFPB, it hasn’t been around a long time, but because of the work they’ve done -- it’s not a big agency, but they’ve already put over $5 billion back into the pockets of more than 15 million families.  (Applause.)  Because they’ve taken on unfair lending practices and unscrupulous mortgage brokers.  And they’ve gotten refunds for folks, and are working with state and local officials to make sure that people are protected when it comes to their finances.  Because if you work hard, you shouldn’t be taken advantage of.  (Applause.)  
 
And today, they’re taking new steps towards cracking down on some of the most abusive practices involving payday loans and title loans.  (Applause.) 
 
Now, Ollie was talking about this in a very personal way.  I want to just break this down for folks.  Every year, millions of Americans take out these payday loans -- here in Alabama, there are four times as many payday lending stores as there are McDonald’s.  Think about that.  Because there are a lot of McDonald’s.  (Laughter.)  There are four times as many payday loan operations here in Alabama as there are McDonald’s.  
 
Now, what they’ll say, the folks who run these things -- in theory, what they’ll say is these loans help you deal with a one-time expense.  So your car breaks down, you got to get to work; you go there, cash a check real quick, or get a quick loan, and then that's the end of it.  In reality, most payday loans aren’t taken out for one-time expenses.  They’re taken out to pay for previous loans.  You borrow money to pay for the money you already borrowed.  
 
As Ollie will tell you, before you know it, you find yourselves trapped in a cycle of debt.  At first it seems like easy money.  But the average borrower ends up spending about 200 days out of the year in debt.  You take out a $500 loan at the rates that they're charging in these payday loans -- some cases 450 percent interest -- you wind up paying more than $1,000 in interest and fees on the $500 that you borrowed. 
 
We were hearing a story from some of the advocates who were working here in Alabama, a story about a family -- the grandmother died, matriarch of the family.  She passed away.  They don't have quite enough to pay for the funeral.  They go to a payday loan, borrow for the funeral; can't pay back the loan in time; the family’s car gets taken away.  And the two folks who are the breadwinners in that family lose their jobs because they can't get to work.  Right?  So what started off as a short-term emergency suddenly becomes a catastrophic financial situation for that family.
 
And you don’t need to be a math genius to know that it’s a pretty bad deal if you're borrowing $500 and you have to pay back $1,000 in interest.  
 
So I just met with faith leaders and consumer advocates and civil rights leaders here in Alabama who are coming together to change that.  And I want to say that this is a bipartisan effort. You've got some very conservative folks here in Alabama who recognize -- they're reading their Bible, they're saying, well, that ain’t right.  (Laughter and applause.)  Right?  I mean, they're saying the Bible is not wild about somebody charging $1,000 worth of interest on a $500 loan.  Because it feels like you're taking advantage of somebody.  If you're lending to somebody, knowing they can't pay you back, and you're going to put them on the hook and just squeeze them harder and harder and harder and take more and more money out of them, you're taking advantage of them.
 
And so I’m very proud of the bipartisan effort here in Alabama to try to change this.  But I want everybody to know they're not going to have to fight alone.  Because at the federal level, the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, the CFPB, announced today that it’s going to take important steps towards protecting consumers from getting stuck into these cycles of debt.  (Applause.)  
 
And the idea is pretty common sense:  If you lend out money, you have to first make sure that the borrower can afford to pay it back.  Don't lend somebody money if you know they can't pay it back.  
 
As Americans, we don't mind seeing folks make a profit.  And if somebody lends you money, then we expect you to charge interest on that loan.  But if you're making that profit by trapping hardworking Americans into a vicious cycle of debt, you got to find a new business model.  You got to find a new way of doing business.  (Applause.)  
 
So this is just one more way that America’s new consumer watchdog is making sure more of your paycheck stays in your pocket.  And in the meantime, we're also going to be working to educate folks on how to think about their money.  
 
We were talking to Dr. Ward, and through the community college process, through consumer advocates at the local level, in the high schools, we need to be teaching young people the dangers of taking out too much consumer debt.  (Applause.)  
 
And this is one more way that Wall Street reform -- what we passed five years ago -- is protecting working families and taxpayers.  And that strengthens the economy.  
 
And that's one more reason why it makes no sense that the Republican budget would make it harder for the CFPB to do its job, and would allow Wall Street to go back to the kind of recklessness that led to the crisis in the first place, and would allow these kinds of lenders who are not doing the right thing to keep at it.  
 
I have to be clear:  If Republicans in Congress send me a bill that unravels the reforms we’ve put in place, if they send me a bill that unravels Wall Street reform, I will veto it.  (Applause.)  
 
And this is not about politics.  It’s about basic values of honesty and fair play.  It’s about the basic bargain that says, here in America, hard work should pay off, responsibility should be rewarded.  
 
One of the people who I met with was Reverend Shannon Webster of Birmingham’s First Presbyterian Church.  Where’s the pastor?  He’s here somewhere.  There he is, in the back.  Stand up so everybody can see you.  (Applause.)  So Pastor Webster is one of the pastors leading the effort to protect consumers here in Alabama.  And at a public hearing a few years ago, he explained why he decided to work on this issue:  “When our people are trapped in debt,” he said, “they cannot escape, and we’re all hurt.”  We’re all hurt.  And that’s a simple statement, but it captures so much of what it means to be an American.  
 
We are a nation of rugged individuals.  We don’t expect folks to give us a handout.  We expect people to work hard.  We expect that hard work to be rewarded.  If you’re out there and you’re working hard and starting a business, and doing the right thing and looking after your family, and not spending beyond yours means, folks like that shouldn’t be punished or expected to pay for everybody else.  We expect everybody to be responsible.  
 
But we’re also our brother’s keeper.  We’re also our sister’s keeper.  (Applause.)  We’re also a country that was built on the idea that everybody gets a fair shot and that we put laws in place to make sure that folks aren’t taken advantage of. When this country does not live up to its promise of fairness and opportunity for all people, we’re all hurt.  (Applause.)  When we do live up to those promises, all of us are better off.    
 
Back in 2008, I came to Birmingham as a candidate for this office, and I said, “There is nothing we cannot do if the American people decide it’s time.”  Seven years later, I still believe there is nothing we cannot do if we decide it is time.  (Applause.)  We’re all in this thing together, Alabama.  We’ve been through some tough times together, but we’re coming back together.  If we decide this is our time, then together we’re going to write the next great chapter in this country’s history. We’re going to do it not just because I came to town, but because of the wonderful people in this town who are already making it happen.
 
Thank you, Alabama.  (Applause.)  God bless you.  God bless the United States of America.   
 
END                3:44 P.M. EDT
 

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by NSC Spokesperson Bernadette Meehan on National Security Advisor Susan E. Rice’s Meeting with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg

National Security Advisor Susan E. Rice met today with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg to discuss transatlantic security issues, progress on commitments from the 2014 Wales Summit, and plans for the next NATO Summit in 2016.  The two reviewed the status of NATO’s Readiness Action Plan, which will bolster collective defense within the alliance, and discussed the President’s recent decision to maintain approximately 10,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan through the end of 2015 and NATO’s ongoing Resolute Support Mission to train, advice and assist the Afghan National Security Forces.  The two discussed the alliance’s expanding role in building the defense capacities of NATO partner nations.  They also reiterated their commitment to moving allies toward the defense investment targets agreed at Wales.  Ambassador Rice thanked the NATO Secretary General for his strong leadership of the alliance at a critical period for European security, and was pleased to convey the President’s invitation for him to visit in May.  

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at Roundtable on the Economy

Lawson State Community College
Birmingham, Alabama

3:14 P.M. CDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, it’s wonderful to be here at Lawson State Community College.  I want to thank Dr. Ward for his hospitality.  We're going to end up addressing a much larger crowd, but I wanted to take time while I was here to have a chance to talk to some people who are extraordinarily active here in Alabama around the issue of payday lending, title lending and, frankly, predatory lending.

Here in Alabama, like in many parts of the country, including my home city of Chicago, a lot of folks will come across some difficult times.  Occasionally, something happens -- somebody gets sick in the family -- although now they’ve got the Affordable Care Act.  (Laughter.)  The car may break down at a bad time, a child may need something.  And if things are tight and many of these communities don't have traditional banking services, too often they get steered into payday loans.

And the challenge is that the interest rates that are so often charged on these short-term loans, they can be as high as 400 percent, 450 percent interest.  It means that a $500 loan might require $1,000 in interest on top of the loan.  

And I just was hearing a story from Steven here about a family whose grandmother dies, and they take out a small loan for the funeral, aren’t able to pay it back right away, lose their car, and two members of the family then lose their job, and the entire family’s financial situation collapses.  That's not who we are.  That's not who we should be as a country.

And the good news is that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that was set up under Wall Street reform announced today that they're going to be initiating regulations to make sure that we're adhering to a basic principle, which is if we're going to have financial institutions provide loans to families and individuals, they got to make sure that these individuals have the capacity to pay them back; that they're not going to be on the hook and burdened in perpetuity as a consequence of what was a short-term problem.  We don't want that translated then into a long-term financial crisis for these families. 

It’s something that we know states around the country have been able to do, but unfortunately too many states have not yet taken these steps.  By having a federal rule through the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, we're going to be able to make sure that more and more people get more protection.  And in the meantime, these outstanding folks who are sitting around the table are going to continue to push efforts at the state level to try to make progress.

And it’s important to note that this is not a partisan issue.  There are Republicans, as well as Democrats, who care deeply about this issue.  There are members of the faith community who see a biblical injunction in not engaging in usury and taking advantage of people at moments where they're most vulnerable.  And so we very much appreciate both the Democrats and Republicans here in the state of Alabama who are promoting state-based solutions. 

In the meantime, we're going to make sure that we continue to promote solutions at the federal level, as well.  And I’m very proud of the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau for promulgating these rules.  There’s going to be a comment period.  There’s going to be a lengthy debate.  But I’m going to be on the side of making sure that these rules are as strong as possible.

Okay?  Did I miss any?  Thank you, people.

END
3:19 P.M. CDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Press Gaggle by Principal Deputy Press Secretary Eric Schultz en route Birmingham, AL

Aboard Air Force One
En Route Birmingham, Alabama 

1:59 P.M. EDT

MR. SCHULTZ:   Welcome aboard, everyone, to Air Force One en route to Birmingham, where the President will continue to draw the contrast between his vision for middle-class economics and efforts by Republicans in Congress to roll back the progress we've made in creating a safer financial system and a stronger economy that supports the middle class.

He’s going to highlight a number of consumer protection efforts that this administration has undertaken, including actions in just the last three months, like cracking down on backdoor payments and hidden fees that incentivize bad retirement investment advice, and sets to help student borrowers afford their loan payments.

As I think some of you saw, today the CFPB announced its latest consumer protection effort.  They’re taking an important step toward writing rules to help prevent abuses and payday lending, and protect consumers from getting trapped in expensive cycles of debt and fees.

This is particularly relevant today, because just last night House Republicans passed a budget that would weaken the CFPB, roll back consumer protections, and risk returning the country to the days of “too big to fail.” 

And speaking of our vision of middle-class economics, I wanted to make sure you saw that earlier today, Microsoft announced a new policy requiring many of its 2,000 contractors and vendors to provide their employees who perform work for Microsoft with 15 paid days off for sick days and vacation time.  In his State of the Union address, as you all know, the President shined a spotlight on the need for sick pay and family leave policies, noting that at least 43 million private sector workers lack such benefits and that the United States stands alone among advanced countries in not requiring paid sick and family leave to our workers.

And with that, I will take your questions.

Q    Can you tell us what the President’s reaction was for the charges against Bowe Bergdahl and whether he still, if he could do it all over again, would exchange him for the Taliban five?

MR. SCHULTZ:  Nedra, as you know, the United States does not leave any American soldier behind.  That’s an oath that is very solemn to the President.  And as Americans, we have an unwavering commitment and patriotic duty to leave no man or woman in uniform behind on the battlefield.

Sergeant Bergdahl’s recovery is a reminder of that commitment, and our solemn obligation to recover our captured servicemen and women has no qualifications.

As for the circumstances surrounding this particular case, given that it's an ongoing case in the military justice system, it's important to protect the integrity of that process.  So for that reason, I'm not going to be able to be in a position to comment much further. 

Q    Let me ask you then about the Taliban five.  There’s been some concerns about whether they could return to the battlefield.  Is the United States going to ask Qatar to keep them beyond the year agreement that they have?

MR. SCHULTZ:  Sure, Nedra.  We do remain in continuous communication with the Qatari government, but I'm not going to be able to comment on the specifics of those conversations.  But we do have tremendous confidence that, working closely with our partners, we are going to be -- we will be able to continue to be in a strong position to substantially mitigate the potential risk that these individuals may pose.

Q    But you are asking them to stay at Doha at this point?

MR. SCHULTZ:  I'm not going to be in a position to read out details of those conversations.  But I can tell you that our team is working with the Qatari government to make sure those threats remain mitigated.

Q    Any reaction to the news that the Germanwings flight seems to have been brought down as a deliberate act?

MR. SCHULTZ:  Mary, I will just tell you, as the President said two days ago now, our thoughts and prayers remain with the victims of the crash and their loved ones.  As we've noted previously, the President spoke on Tuesday with Chancellor Merkel and President Rajoy to offer his condolences and any assistance that the United States can provide.  We do remain in touch with French authorities as they’re the lead in this investigation, offering to provide any assistance we can.

Q    And given what appears to have happened with the locked cockpit on that flight, are any agencies being instructed to review current protocol? 

MR. SCHULTZ:  Mary, all I would do is refer you to the French authorities for the latest on their investigation.

Q    Wait, wait, wait -- why would you refer us to the French authorities on whether or not an American agency or American regulators would be reviewing any safety procedures?  That doesn't make any sense.

MR. SCHULTZ:  Fair enough, Mike.  I’d refer you to the FAA -- (laughter) -- if they're taking any action.

Q    Exactly the answer I wanted.

Q    Eric, can I ask you about Yemen?  Can you tell me whether or not -- does the U.S. see this operation as aimed to defeat the Houthis, or merely drive them back to the negotiating table?

MR. SCHULTZ:  Can you repeat that one more time?

Q    Yes.  Do you see this operation as aimed to defeat the Houthis, or to drive them back to the negotiating table?  And can they be pressured into moving without some sort of ground invasion, ground troops?

MR. SCHULTZ:  Thank you, Lesley.  I’ll just say that in response to the deteriorating security situation, Saudi Arabia, Gulf Cooperation Council members and others will undertake military action to defend Saudi Arabia’s border and to protect Yemen’s legitimate government.  As announced by these GCC members yesterday, they're taking this action as the request of President Hadi. 

The United States does coordinate closely with Saudi Arabia and our GCC partners on issues related to their security and our shared interests.  In support of GCC actions to defend against -- I’m sorry -- in support of these actions, President Obama has authorized the provision of logistical and intelligence support to this military operation.

While the U.S. are not taking direct military action in Yemen in support of this effort, we are establishing a joint planning cell with Saudi Arabia to coordinate U.S. military and intelligence support.  More specifically to your question I think, we are fully aware and supportive of the GCC members’ decision to respond to President Hadi’s request and take this action to defend Saudi Arabia’s border and to protect Yemen’s legitimate government.

Q    But would the U.S. consider taking direct military action in the future if the situation doesn't improve?

MR. SCHULTZ:  Colleen, I can read out to you what’s been decided thus far and explain what we're doing now.  But I don't have any future actions to rule in or rule out.

Q    Can you talk about any coordination that the U.S. might have done with the Saudis ahead of the strikes?

MR. SCHULTZ:  Yes.  Nedra, I will tell you that we do consult closely with our Saudi and other GCC partners on the situation in Yemen and share their serious concerns regarding the Houthis’ ongoing military actions.  I’m not going to be in a position to read out to you specific conversations, but I can tell you that folks at our relevant agencies are in touch with our counterparts abroad.

Q    Following on that, can you tell us when President Obama was made aware of the Saudi operation in Yemen?

MR. SCHULTZ:  I don't have the internal details on that to unpack.

Q    Okay.  And can you say, is it a concern at all that our involvement here could somehow have a negative impact on conversations with Iran over the nuclear deal?

MR. SCHULTZ:  Julia, we don't see it that way.  We believe the international community is united behind the goal of making sure Iran does not have a pathway to a nuclear weapon.  Those conversations are ongoing in earnest as we approach the deadline, as you all have covered closely. 

Q    Was President Obama -- what was his reaction to news that Hillary Clinton broke a promise she made to him in 2008 that she would disclose all donations -- foreign and within the U.S. -- made to her foundation?  It was reported this week that since 2010 she did not disclose all of them.

MR. SCHULTZ:  I actually haven’t seen those reports, so I don't know the details.  All I can tell you is that I do know there is a memo of understanding, as you all have reported, back in 2008 I believe, that was signed before Secretary Clinton was conformed in order to avoid appearance of any conflict of interest and in keeping with the high standards we set for our nominees.  Those standards, you should know, went above and beyond historical precedent in terms of Cabinet secretaries. 

But for details on how that was implemented or operationalized, I’d refer you to the State Department because they were in charge of implementing it.

Thank you, guys.

END
2:07 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Presidential Nominations Sent to the Senate

NOMINATIONS SENT TO THE SENATE:   

Thomas A. Burke, of Maryland, to be an Assistant Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, vice Paul T. Anastas, resigned.

Atul Keshap, of Virginia, a Career Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Class of Counselor, to be Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, and to serve concurrently and without additional compensation as Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to the Republic of Maldives.

Julieta Valls Noyes, of Virginia, a Career Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Class of Minister-Counselor, to be Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to the Republic of Croatia.

Franklin R. Parker, of Illinois, to be an Assistant Secretary of the Navy, vice Juan M. Garcia III.

Alaina B. Teplitz, of Illinois, a Career Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Class of Minister-Counselor, to be Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to the Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal.