Health Care Blog
What They’re Saying: New Health Care Rules Protect Consumers
Posted by on November 22, 2010 at 6:26 PM EDTThis morning, the Obama Administration issued a regulation implementing a provision of the Affordable Care Act that will require insurance companies to spend at least 80 to 85 percent of premium dollars on medical care and health care quality improvement, rather than on administrative costs, starting in 2011. If they don’t, the insurance companies will be required to provide a rebate to their customers starting in 2012.
President Obama highlighted the new policy in an email this afternoon, and White House Office of Health Reform Director Nancy-Ann Deparle has recorded a new White House White Board video discussing the policy.
Consumer groups, Congressional leaders and advocates are praising the new rules for helping to give consumers a better value for their premium dollar and brining transparency to the health insurance marketplace. Here’s what they are saying:
American Medical Association
"Patients deserve to get the maximum value from their health insurance premiums, and requiring that at least 80 percent of the patients' premium dollars be spent on medical care can help accomplish this goal. The AMA worked closely with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) to prevent the health insurance industry from undermining this important patient benefit from the new health care law."National Business Coalition on Health
"NBCH is pleased to see that quality improvement efforts will be considered a direct medical expense and not administrative overhead. This strengthens the incentive for health plans to invest in developing a robust quality improvement infrastructure than can drive the health care system towards higher value."AARP
"We are pleased that the Administration has adopted consumer-friendly medical loss ratio rules that, on the whole, strike a smart balance between ensuring value for consumers and compensating insurers for legitimate administrative costs. Coupled with new benefits under the health care law, these regulations ensure consumers will receive better value for their health care dollars."Consumers Union
"The term ‘medical loss ratio’ isn’t exactly consumer-friendly, but these new rules are very good for consumers. People are going to get better value for their premium dollars."American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network
"The Affordable Care Act for the first time requires health insurance companies to disclose information that is intended to help consumers understand the value they are getting for the premiums they pay. This strong rule will help to ensure that patients are accurately informed about the portion of their premiums that are spent on medical care instead of company profits, broker commissions or administrative costs. It signifies the start of a critical consumer-education process that will finally help people with cancer or at risk for cancer to make informed decisions about the plans they purchase."Speaker Nancy Pelosi
"Today, we take a major step forward to ensure consumers more value for their health care dollars, increasing transparency and requiring health insurers to spend 80 to 85 percent of consumers’ premiums on direct care for patients and efforts to improve care quality."Congressman Henry Waxman
"In today’s market, too many insurers – particularly in the individual health care market – charge high premiums and yet spend 30 percent or more on administrative costs, high salaries, and profits. The American public deserves to know what happens to their premium dollars, and they deserve to have those dollars devoted to providing health care services."Senator Max Baucus
"This rule delivers better health care to individuals and families and more value for every dollar spent on health care, ensuring consumers’ premium dollars are spent on quality care, not insurance company profits. By increasing transparency and making clear how insurers spend premium dollars, health reform helps end insurance companies’ abuses, including unjustified premium increases."Senator Tom Harkin
"Finally, millions of American consumers will be able to pay their health insurance premiums with some confidence, knowing that those dollars will go towards their health care rather than executive salaries or administrative costs. Because of the historic consumer protections in The Affordable Care Act, insurers will now be held strictly accountable for providing a high value for every premium dollar and reporting the results to consumers."Senator Patty Murray
"These new rules will make sure that the premiums paid by families in my home state of Washington go toward health care for patients, not excessive profits for insurance companies. We worked to reform our broken health care system to make sure patients and families came first, and this new rule is an important step toward that goal."Senator Al Franken
"Implementation of the medical loss ratio provision is a huge step toward ensuring consumers’ premium dollars go to actual health care, not insurance company coffers. Many health insurers spend as little as 65 percent of your premiums on care, and the rest goes to enormous CEO salaries, advertising, or wasteful administrative costs. These regulations will hold health insurers accountable and make sure consumers get more value for their money."Congressman Pete Stark
"The new medical loss ratio standard will help consumers get better value for their health insurance -- ensuring that at least 80 cents of every patients' premium dollar is spent on medical care. This important consumer protection is another example of how health reform will help consumers even before full implementation of the law in 2014."Congressman Sander Levin
"Today’s announcement is yet another example of how health reform is putting the consumer first and guaranteeing that Americans will get the full value of their premium dollar."Senator Ben Nelson
"This new pro-consumer, states-developed rule means Nebraskans will know that most of the money they pay for insurance is being spent on medical care and quality improvement initiatives, rather than on administrative overhead, marketing and profits."Stephanie Cutter is Assistant to the President for Special Projects
Learn more about Health CareWhite House White Board: Your Health Care Dollars
Posted by on November 22, 2010 at 2:11 PM EDTToday, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a new rule called the “medical loss ratio” rule that will require health insurance companies to spend 80 to 85 percent of your health care insurance premiums on making you healthier instead of overhead costs like advertising or executive compensation. Like many other provisions in the Affordable Care Act, the medical loss ratio rule brings a whole new level of transparency to the health insurance marketplace and holds the insurers accountable.
Nancy-Ann DeParle, Director of the Office of Health Reform at the White House, takes some time to explain the new rule and why it’s so important in this video:
If you’d like to learn more, visit HealthCare.gov. And if you have questions about the medical loss ratio rule or the Affordable Care Act in general, tune in tomorrow for a live chat with Nancy-Ann DeParle at 2:15 p.m. EST.
Learn more about Health CareTuesday Talks: Health Care Reform Implementation with Nancy-Ann DeParle
Posted by on November 19, 2010 at 5:58 PM EDT[UPDATE: This event has now concluded.]
Ed. Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a new rule called the “medical loss ratio” rule that will require health insurance companies to spend 80 to 85 percent of your health care insurance premiums on making you healthier instead of overhead costs like advertising or executive compensation. Nancy-Ann DeParle took some time to explain the new rule and why it’s so important in this video.
Nancy-Ann DeParle, Director of the White House Office of Health Reform, is answering your questions on health reform implementation in a live video chat for Tuesday Talks. In March 2010, President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law — the Act gives you better health security by putting in place comprehensive health insurance reforms that hold insurance companies accountable, lower health care costs, guarantee more choice, and enhance the quality of care for all Americans.
Join us for a talk with Nancy-Ann DeParle on Tuesday, November 23rd at 2:15 p.m. EST.
Here's how you can participate:
- Ask your questions in advance on WhiteHouse.gov
- Ask your questions in advance on Facebook
- Join the discussion live through the White House Facebook application
- Watch the chat through WhiteHouse.gov/live
Visit WhiteHouse.gov/healthreform to learn more about health care reform.
Learn more about Health CareNew Rules Require Equal Visitation Rights For All Patients
Posted by on November 17, 2010 at 6:58 PM EDTEarlier this year, President Obama called on the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to create new rules for Medicare and Medicaid hospitals that would allow patients the right to choose their own visitors during a hospital stay. The Presidential Memorandum instructed HHS to develop rules that would prohibit hospitals from denying visitation privileges on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability.
Today, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has issued that rule – a rule that will let patients decide whom they want by their bedside when they are sick – and that includes a visitor who is a same-sex domestic partner. The rule presents an important step forward in giving all Americans more control over their health care.
Learn more about Civil Rights, Health Care$86.2 Million
Posted by on November 17, 2010 at 2:12 PM EDTToday, Bloomberg News reported that big insurance companies – companies like UnitedHealth Group Inc. and Cigna Corp – spent $86.2 million to fight health insurance reform in 2009. Insurance companies and their allies were desperate to preserve their ability to discriminate against you if you had a preexisting condition, drop your care when you got sick and limit the amount of care you could receive in a year or a lifetime.
Thankfully, they didn’t succeed, but some folks still want to take us back to the bad old days when insurance companies had all the power and doctors and patients took a back seat. In fact, the New York Times recently reported that since the law was passed, opponents of reform spent $108 million on negative television advertisements about the law. And these powerful interests may spend millions more opposing reform in the future.
Millions of Americans are already benefitting from the law. Americans like Dawn Josephson of Florida, whose child finally received comprehensive health insurance coverage, even though he had a pre-existing condition and Jennifer Restemayer of North Dakota, whose daughter Allison was diagnosed with a rare disease. Jennifer feared hear daughter would hit her lifetime benefit cap until reform made those benefit caps illegal. You can read their stories and many more by visiting our 50 States/50 Stories map on WhiteHouse.gov/HealthReform.
Some may be willing to spend millions to take us backwards, but we will continue to move forward by fighting for Americans like Dawn and Jennifer and delivering the benefits of reform to the American people.
Stephanie Cutter is Assistant to the President for Special Projects
Learn more about Health CareMyths about Medicaid
Posted by on November 16, 2010 at 6:55 PM EDTToday’s Wall Street Journal includes a story claiming that states will suffer through a deep fiscal crisis because of the Affordable Care Act. Unfortunately, the story relies on flawed studies and omits important information about some of the key benefits in the new law for states and their residents. Here are the facts:
Insuring More Americans Will Help Save Money for States: Under the new law, 32 million more Americans will have health insurance, thereby saving money normally spent on caring for the uninsured. And savings for states under the new law could be substantial. The Urban Institute has estimated that:
“…state and local governments would save approximately $70-80 billion over the 2014-2019 period by shifting this spending into federally matched Medicaid, clearly exceeding the new cost to states of the Medicaid expansion…”
And after detailing other potential savings, the same report concludes:
“In sum, states as a whole can probably achieve savings that significantly exceed their increased costs for low-income Medicaid adults.”
By insuring more Americans, the Affordable Care Act will substantially decrease the amount states spend to care for the uninsured, which in 2008 cost states $17.2 billion. Overall, boosted federal Medicaid support to states will decrease the share of how much they spend to cover their Medicaid enrollees’ health care expenses by 4.5 percent.
Administrative Costs Will Be Supported by the Federal Government: Today’s story wrongly claims that the new law “sticks states with a significant amount of the administrative costs” associated with their Medicaid programs. In fact, the Obama Administration recently proposed that the federal government cover 90 percent of the cost of updating state Medicaid systems to ensure these systems are as efficient as possible.
Even in These Tough Economic Times, States Continue to Make Improvements to their Medicaid Programs: A recent Kaiser Family Foundation survey found that nearly all states are proactively improving their Medicaid programs to provide better care and make these programs more efficient. These improvements, combined with substantial resources from the federal government, for example, through the newly launched Innovation Center, will help ensure states do not have to cut spending in other crucial areas to support their Medicaid programs.
Today’s Story Relies on Flawed Studies: The article cites deeply flawed analyses on the impact of the Medicaid expansion on Mississippi, Indiana, and Nebraska. As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities notes:
“These studies, however, conducted by the consulting firm Milliman, Inc., have serious flaws. They produce overstated estimates of the costs of the Medicaid expansion because they rely on a number of problematic assumptions…”
One of the assumptions these studies make is that 100 percent of those who are currently eligible for Medicaid, as well as 100 percent of those newly eligible will enroll in the program. Neither the Congressional Budget Office, nor the Chief Actuary of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, made this assumption when they projected the Affordable Care Act’s impact on Medicaid enrollment because there is no evidence to support it. Medicare, which offers coverage to all Americans over the age of 65 does not have 100 percent enrollment. The studies also tended to overestimate per-capita Medicaid beneficiary costs, as well as the number of people who would opt out of private health insurance for Medicaid. You can read the full report by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities here.
Under the new law, millions of Americans who have been uninsured will have coverage, the worst insurance company abuses will be banned and states will save money they would have spent caring for the uninsured. That’s a good deal for millions of Americans and state budgets.Stephanie Cutter is Assistant to the President for Special Projects
Learn more about Health Care
- &lsaquo previous
- …
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- …
- next &rsaquo