The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event

Private Residence
Golden Beach, Florida

7:31 P.M.

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you, everybody.  (Applause.)  Well, first of all, let me thank Jeremy, who has been a friend for a long time.  He supported me at a time when nobody could pronounce my name, and had great faith, probably because I think we’re both basketball fans, and he was impressed with my knowledge, although his seats at games are generally better than mine.  (Laughter.) 
 
And I want to thank Jeremy’s family for taking the time to be here, and his lovely mom and sisters.  And Kirk Wagar, who has just been working so hard on my behalf not just this time out but the previous time out.  We appreciate you.
 
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who is not only a outstanding member of Congress and a great mom but is also doing wonderful work on behalf of the DNC -- we appreciate her.  Thank you, Florida, for sending her into the national spotlight. 
 
And Mayor Anthony Foxx -- he is going to be our host in Charlotte, when we have our convention, and so we’re glad that he’s here as well.  (Applause.
 
And of course I appreciate all of you.  Some of you have been great friends in other venues, and we appreciate everything that you do.
 
I’m going to be very brief at the top because I want to spend most of my time answering questions and getting comments and thoughts from you.  We’ve gone through three of the toughest years in our lifetimes -- an economy that almost tipped into a Great Depression; an auto industry that almost went belly-up; a banking system that froze; millions of people losing their jobs; a housing market that collapsed -- a world economic crisis that began just a little bit before I was sworn into office, and we’ve been fighting to bring America back ever since.
 
The good news is we’re making enormous progress on a whole range of fronts.  The auto industry is back on its feet, selling cars.  GM is making regular profits and is the number-one automaker again in the world, and they’re making better cars.  We’ve made progress in doubling fuel-efficiency standards on cars that help our environment and are reducing -- is reducing our dependence on foreign oil.  Actually, each year that I’ve been in office we’ve been importing less oil, even as the economy has become more productive and is growing.
 
Four million jobs over the last two years.  The best manufacturing job growth since the 1990s -- 600,000 jobs just in the last three months alone.
 
So we’re making progress, but I think all of us understand that we’ve still got a lot more work to do, partly because we haven’t fully recovered from the depths of this crisis -- there are still too many people out there who are looking for work, there are still too many homes that are underwater.  Florida -- the economy here is still suffering from the headwinds of the housing market and its collapse.  But partly because when we ran for office -- when I ran for office in 2008, the goal wasn't just to get back to where we were in 2007.  Because even then, even before the economic crisis had hit -- the financial crisis had hit, we had seen a decade in which job growth was sluggish, and incomes and wages for ordinary people didn't just flat-line, they actually went down when you factored in inflation.
 
That sense of middle-class security -- the sense that if you worked hard you could get ahead, support a family, send your kids to college, retire with dignity and respect -- that sense of security had been slipping away for too many people.  And the goal in 2008 was to make those changes, to get rid of those obstacles, to reform systems that had had problems for decades so that middle-class Americans and people who aspire to get in the middle class would once again have a chance.  An economy that was characterized by everybody having a fair shot and everybody doing their fair share and everybody playing by the same set of rules -- that’s what we’ve been fighting for.
 
And that’s why in addition to just dealing with the immediate crisis, in addition to dealing with two wars, ending one, transitioning in another, in addition to going after bin Laden and making sure that we degraded the al Qaeda network, in addition to restoring America’s respect in the world, in addition to all the things we’ve done in foreign policy, in crisis management, what we’ve tried to do is also make sure that we’re dealing with those long-term barriers to economic growth and prosperity, broad-based prosperity.
 
So that means having an energy policy that emphasizes clean energy and solar and wind power and all those things that are going to allow us to stay at the cutting edge in the 21st century.  It means reforming our education system -- K-12, community colleges and four-year colleges and universities -- so that we’ve got the best workforce in the world in this more competitive environment that we’re in.
 
It means dealing with health care -- not only to make sure that 30 million people get health care that didn't have it before, so nobody is bankrupt when they get sick in this country, but also to start rationalizing the system so that it is more efficient, provides better care, lowers costs, is a good deal for everybody.
 
And it means making sure that we've got a budget, a tax system, that is fair so that you don’t have Warren Buffett paying a lower tax rate than his secretary; so that we can lower the deficits and make investments that we need in the future generations -- in rebuilding our infrastructure and investing in basic science and research, college loans for students -- but doing so in a way that’s paid for.  And part of paying for it is, folks like me and many of you, making sure that we are doing our fair bit.
 
Now, the other side has a just fundamentally different   
view of these issues, and that’s before we start talking about things like the courts and access to justice and women’s rights and voting rights and a whole range of social concerns where, again, there is a -- immigration -- where there is a big contrast between what the other side is peddling and what I think is needed to make this country strong.
 
So you’re probably going to have as big a contrast in this election as we’ve seen in a very long time.  And that means that we may have to work even harder than we did in 2008.
 
The good news is I think the American people are on our side.  I think the American people understand that this country is stronger when we come together, and we’re looking out for one another, and we’re thinking about the future, and not just the next election.
 
But they expect to see us fight for them.  And that’s what I intend to keep doing, with your help, for the next four and a half years. 
 
So thank you very much, everybody.  Thank you.  (Applause.)
 
END
7:39 P.M.
 

President Obama Makes the Case for the Buffett Rule

President Obama was in Florida today to talk about our economy, and what he called the essence of America: the idea that everyone who works hard should be able to do well.  

America has always been a place where anybody who's willing to work and play by the rules can make it.  A place where prosperity doesn’t trickle down from the top, it grows from the bottom; it grows outward from the heart of a vibrant middle class.

Instead of giving more than a trillion dollars in tax breaks to the very wealthiest Americans—those who make more than $250,000 a year—we need to be investing in the things like education and research and health care. These are the same investments we’ve been making for generations because they lead to strong, broad based economic growth that helps everyone, as the President explained:

What drags our entire economy down is when the benefits of economic growth and productivity go only to the few, which is what’s been happening for over a decade now, and gap between those at the very, very top and everybody else keeps growing wider and wider and wider and wider.

 The fact is, the share of our national income going to the top 1 percent of earners is as high as it’s been since the 1920s. And those same people are paying taxes at one of the lowest rates in 50 years. To address this imbalance in our tax system, President Obama has proposed the Buffett Rule, based on the simple idea that people who make more than $1 million each year pay at least the same share of their income in taxes as middle-class families do. With the Buffett Rule in place, the President said:

 …it makes it affordable for us to be able to say for those people who make under $250,000 a year -- like 98 percent of American families do -- then your taxes don’t go up. And we can still make those investments in things like student loans and college and science and infrastructure and all the things that make this country great.   

President Obama Delivers Remarks at Florida Atlantic University

President Barack Obama delivers waves to the crowd before delivering remarks on the economy at Florida Atlantic University in Boca Raton, Fla., April 10, 2012. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Related Topics: Buffett Rule, Economy, Florida

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event -- Hollywood, FL

Westin Diplomat Hotel, Hollywood, Florida

5:50 P.M. EDT

        THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, Florida!  (Applause.)

        AUDIENCE MEMBER:  We love you!

        THE PRESIDENT:  I love you back.  (Applause.)  

        It is good to be back in the Sunshine State.  (Applause.)  Well, there are some folks here I want to acknowledge.  Everybody, have a seat.  Relax.  I've got a few things to say. (Laughter.)  First of all, your own Debbie Wasserman Schultz is in the house.  (Applause.)  Outstanding members of Congress -- Ted Deutch is here.  (Applause.)  Federica Wilson is here.  (Applause.)  Our Florida finance chair, Kirk Wagar is here.  (Applause.)  Broward County finance chair, Andrew Weinstein is here.  (Applause.)  

        The outstanding John Legend is in the house.  (Applause.)  John wanted me to sing a duet.  I said no.  (Laughter.)  Not tonight.  But maybe if you practice a little bit -- (laughter.)  And I want to thank Gerri Ann for that wonderful introduction.  Give her a big round of applause as well.  (Applause.)

        Now, I am here not just because the weather is really good. (Laughter.)  I'm not here just because there are a lot of great friends in the audience.  And I'm not even here just because I need your help.  I’m here because your country needs your help.  (Applause.)  A lot of you got involved in this campaign back in 2008.  Some of you worked your hearts out.  It wasn’t, by the way, because you thought it was going to be easy.  When you support a guy named Barack Hussein Obama for President -- (laughter) -- you're not looking at the odds makers.  You don't need a poll to know that's not a sure thing.  (Laughter.)  

        You didn’t join the campaign just because of me.  This wasn’t just about a candidate; this was about a vision that we shared for America -- a vision that all of you shared.  It wasn’t a vision where people are left to fend for themselves, and the most powerful can play by their own rules.  It was a vision of America where everybody works hard, everybody is responsible, and everybody has a chance to get ahead -- not just those at the very top.  The notion that no matter where you come from, what you look like, what your last name is -- black, white, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, disabled or not -- it doesn’t matter, you've got a shot at the American Dream.  (Applause.)  

        That’s the vision we shared.  That’s the change that we believed in.  And we knew it wasn’t going to come easy.  We knew it wouldn’t come quickly.  But we had confidence and faith in the American people and our capacity to bring about an America that was moving closer to our ideals.  And you know what, in just a little over three years, because of what you did in 2008, we've started to see what change looks like.  

        Change is the first bill I signed into law that says women deserve an equal day’s pay for an equal day’s work.  (Applause.) Our daughters should have the same opportunities as our sons.  (Applause.)  You made that happen.   

        Change is the decisions that we made to help prevent a second Great Depression -- to rescue the American auto industry from collapse, even when some politicians were out there saying we should let Detroit go bankrupt.  We had a million jobs on the line if we had let that happen.  And I wasn’t going to let that happen.  And today, GM is back on top as the world’s number one automaker -- (applause) -- making record profits, hiring back workers.  More than 200,000 new jobs over the last two and a half years in the American auto industry.  It is coming back.  That happened because of you.  (Applause.)   

        Change is the decision we made to stop waiting for Congress to do something about our oil addiction.  We doubled fuel-efficiency standards on cars and trucks.  And by the middle of the next decade, we’re going to be driving American-made cars that get almost 55 miles to a gallon, saves the typical family $8,000 at the pump.  (Applause.)  That happened because of you.    
        We decided let's stop handing out $60 billion in taxpayer giveaways to banks that were managing the student loan program, let's give the money directly to students.  (Applause.)  And because of you, millions of young people have gotten help affording college and being able to compete in this 21st century economy.  That happened because of your work back in 2008 and beyond.

        Yes, change is health care reform that we passed after a century of trying -- (applause) -- reform that says in the United States of America, the greatest country on Earth, nobody should go broke because they get sick.  (Applause.)  And because of that law, right now 2.5 million young people have health insurance that didn't have it before because they can stay on their parent's plans.  (Applause.)

        Right now, millions of seniors are paying less for their prescription drugs.  Right now, every American has the assurance that they can't be denied coverage or dropped by their insurance company when they need care the most.  And they can get preventive care, regardless of who they are, regardless of where you come from.  That's what change is.  That happened because of you.

        Change is the fact that for the first time in our history you don't have to hide who you love to serve the country you love because we ended "don't ask, don't tell."   (Applause.)  It’s over.  

        And change is keeping another promise I made in 2008 -- for the first time in nine years there are no Americans fighting in Iraq.  We’ve refocused our efforts on the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11.  (Applause.)  And because of our brave men and women, al Qaeda is back on its heels and Osama bin Laden is no more.  That's what change is.  (Applause.)

        Now, we’ve --

        AUDIENCE:  Four more years!  Four more years!  Four more years!

        THE PRESIDENT:  It’s actually four and a half.  (Laughter.)

        And we’ve begun to transition in Afghanistan to put Afghans in the lead, bring our troops home.  (Applause.)   

        Record investments in clean energy.  Record investments in education.  Restoring science to its rightful place.  Well, none of this has been easy.  And everybody here knows we’ve got a lot more work to do.  There are still so many Americans out there that are still looking for work or trying to find a job that pays a little more, too many families who are barely able to pay the bills, homes underwater.  We’re still recovering from the worst economic crisis in generations.  

        But even on the economic front, over these last two years, we’ve seen businesses add more than 4 million new jobs, manufacturers creating jobs for the first time since the 1990s.  The economy is getting stronger.  The recovery is accelerating. And the last thing we can afford to do right now is to go back to the same, worn-out, tired, uninspired, don’t-work policies that got us into this mess in the first place.  (Applause.)  

        But, of course, that’s exactly what the other side wants to do.  They make no bones about it.  They don’t make -- they don’t hide the ball.  They want to go back to the days when Wall Street could play by its own rules.  They’ve said, we want to roll back all the reforms that were put in place to protect consumers and make sure that we don’t end up seeing taxpayer bailouts again.  They want to go back to the days when insurance companies could deny you coverage or jack up premiums without reason.  They want to spend trillions of dollars more on tax breaks for the very wealthiest of Americans, even if it means adding to the deficit, even if it means gutting things like education or clean energy or Medicare.  

        Their philosophy is simple:  If we just let those who have done best keep on doing what they do, and everybody else is struggling to get by, somehow that’s going to grow the economy.  

        They’re wrong.  (Applause.)  In the United States of America we are greater together than we are on our own.  We are better off when we keep that basic American promise:  If you work hard, you can do well enough to raise a family, own a home, send your kids to college, put a little away for retirement.

        And that’s the choice in this election.  This is not just your run-of-the-mill political debate.  We have not seen a contrast like this in a long time.  This is the defining issue of our time, this make-or-break moment for our middle class and all those who are fighting to get into the middle class.  And are we going to stand with those folks who have been the backbone of economic growth in this country throughout our history?

        We could go back to an economy built on outsourcing and bad debt and phony financial profits.  Or we can fight for an economy that’s built to last -- an economy built on American manufacturing, and American energy, and skills for American workers -- (applause) -- and the values of everyday Americans of hard work and fair play and shared responsibility.  (Applause.)  

        And I know what side I am in that debate.  I know what side I'm on in that debate.  I think we've got to make sure that the next generation of manufacturing takes root not in Asia, not in Europe -- takes root right here in the United States of America; right here in Florida, in Detroit, in Pittsburgh, in Cleveland.  (Applause.)  I don’t want this nation just to be known for what we buy and consume.  I want us to be a nation known for what we produce and invent and sell all around the world.  It's time to stop rewarding businesses that are shipping jobs overseas.  Let's reward companies that are investing right here in the United States of America.  (Applause.)  

        Let's make our schools the envy of the world.  (Applause.)  And that starts, by the way, with the men and women at the front of the classroom.  You know, a good teacher can actually increase the lifetime earnings of a classroom by $250,000.  A great teacher can inspire and plant that seed of possibility in a child, no matter how poor they are.  (Applause.)  

        And that's why I don't like hearing folks just bashing teachers.  (Applause.)  I don't want them -- I don't believe in just defending the status quo.  I want schools to have the resources they need to keep good teachers on the job.  Reward the best ones.  Give schools the flexibility to teach with creativity and passion.  Stop teaching to the test.  Give us a chance to train teachers that aren’t doing a great job, get rid of those who are [sic] -- we can create accountability in the system, and high standards, but we’ve got to make sure that we’re thinking about our kids first.  

        And when kids do graduate, the most daunting challenge ends up being the cost of college.  Americans owe more in tuition debt than credit card debt right now, which means, by the way, Congress needs to stop the student interest -- the interest rates on student loans from doubling, which is scheduled to happen in July.  

        And colleges and universities have to do their part.  They’ve got to keep tuition from going up.  And state legislatures need to keep their part by supporting higher education.  (Applause.)  This is not a luxury higher education; it is an economic imperative that every American should be able to afford.

        An economy built to last is one where we support scientists and researchers that are trying to make the next breakthrough happen right here in the United States in biotech and nanotechnology and clean energy.

        We’ve subsidized oil companies for a hundred years.  It’s time to end the hundred years of taxpayer giveaways for an industry that is plenty profitable, doing just fine, have more than enough incentive to keep on producing.  Let’s give it to clean energy industries that have never been more promising -- solar and wind and biodiesel.  (Applause.)

        Let’s rebuild America.  I think about what was built in my grandparents’ generation -- Hoover Dam, Golden Gate Bridge, the Interstate Highway System.  We’ve got to give our businesses the best access to the best roads and the best airports and the fastest railroads, faster Internet access.  It’s time for us to take some of that money that we spent on war, use half of it to pay down our debt, use the rest of it to do some nation-building here at home.  (Applause.)  We can put folks back to work right now rebuilding America.  (Applause.)

        (Lights flicker on and off.)  Is there a little light show going on here?  (Laughter.)  It’s nice.  (Laughter.)  Sort of a  -- it’s a disco rally.  (Laughter.)  Somebody going to pull the roller skates out now?  (Laughter.)  What’s going on here?  

        And finally, we’ve got to make sure that we’ve got a tax system that reflects everybody doing their fair share.  I just spoke about this earlier today.  We have to reduce our deficit.  It’s a long-term challenge.  And we’ve got to do it in a balanced way.  We’ve made some very tough spending cuts.  We’re going to have to make some smart choices in terms of health reform.  That’s what’s driving a lot of increased government spending.  

        We’ve also got to make sure that revenues are there to pay for the things that are absolutely necessary for us to grow our economy, to maintain a basic safety net for our seniors and folks who are vulnerable.  

        Now, the other side, they’ve got a different idea.  They want to decimate basic government investments that historically have helped this economy grow, and use it to finance tax cuts for the very wealthiest.  And I’ve got a different idea.  I say, let’s follow what we call the Buffett Rule.  If you make more than a million dollars a year -- I’m not saying you’ve got a million dollar nest egg that you accumulated over the course of years saving for your retirement.  I’m saying if you make a million dollars a year, then you shouldn’t pay a lower tax rate than your secretary.  (Applause.)  That’s common sense.  That’s not -- they may call in class envy or -- that’s just being fair. And by doing that, that also allows us then to say to folks who are making $250,000 a year or less -- like 98 percent of American families -- that their taxes don’t go up.  (Applause.)

        This is not class warfare.  This is not about envy.  We want Americans to be wealthy.  We want them to be successful.  But this is just basic math.  Because if somebody like me, who is doing just fine, gets tax breaks I don’t need and that the country can’t afford, then one of two things is going to happen: Either it gets added to our deficit -- now, the other side say they care about the deficit; well, these tax cuts add to the deficit -- or, alternatively, you've got to take it away from somebody else -- a student who's trying to pay for their college, or a senior trying to get by with Social Security and Medicare, or a veteran who needs some care after he or she has served this country with distinction, or a family that’s just trying to get by.  That’s not right.  That’s not who we are.   

        You know, when I hear politicians during an election year talk about values -- well, what kind of values does that reflect? Hard work -- that’s a value.  Responsibility -- that’s a value.  Honesty, looking out for one another -- I am my brother's keeper, I am my sister's keeper -- that’s a value.  (Applause.)  Our budget should reflect those values.  Our politics should reflect those values.  

        Everybody here -- look at this room, people from every conceivable background, every part of the country -- everybody here, you're here because somebody, somewhere felt some responsibility not just for themselves, but for others.  It started with your parents, grandparents -- some may have come to this country with nothing but wanted more opportunity for their kids.  (Applause.)  They worked on behalf of their family.  They worked on behalf of their neighborhoods, their community.  They worked on behalf of their country.  They understood that the American story is not about just what you can do on your own.  We’re rugged individualists.  We expect everybody to carry their own weight.  But we also understand that what makes us great is what we can do together.  

        We won’t win the race for new jobs and businesses, we won’t restore middle-class security with the same old you’re-on-your-own economics.  It doesn’t work.  It never worked.  We tried it before the Great Depression, back in the ‘20s -- didn’t work.  We tried it in the last decade.  We were promised how this was going to unleash all this unbelievable economic growth.  And what ended up happening?  Sluggish job growth, wages and incomes flat-lined for middle-class families struggling to get by, and then culminated in the worst financial crisis we’ve seen since the 1930s.  We tried it.  Their theories don’t work.  

        And most people understand this.  They understand there’s a different way to think about the economy and this journey we’re on together.  It says we’ve got a stake in each other’s success. If we attract an outstanding teacher to the profession by paying them properly, by giving them the training they need, the professional development, and that teacher goes on to educate the next Steve Jobs, well, you know what -- we all benefit.  If we provide faster Internet to rural America and then suddenly some storeowner has access to a global market and they’re selling goods and services and growing that business and hiring -- that’s good for all of us.  If we build a bridge that cuts on commuting times and suddenly that shipping company is saving time and money, workers and customers -- the country does better.  

        And this is not historically a Democratic or Republican idea.  It was Republican Teddy Roosevelt who called for a progressive income tax.  Dwight Eisenhower, Republican, built the Interstate Highway System.  It was, with the help of Republicans in Congress, FDR who gave millions of returning heroes, including my grandfather, a chance to get ahead through the GI Bill.  Abraham Lincoln, first Republican President, helped to bind this country together through the Transcontinental Railroad, started the land-grant colleges, National Academy of Sciences.  This is not just a Democratic idea.

        And here’s the good news:  That spirit of common purpose, it still exists all across this country.  Maybe not in Washington.  (Laughter and applause.)  But out in America, it’s there.  It’s there when you talk to folks on Main Street, in town halls.  It’s there when you talk to our unbelievable members of our armed forces.  It’s there when you go to places of worship.  

        Our politics may be divided, but most Americans understand that we’re greater together than we are apart, and that no matter where we come from, who we are, we rise or fall as one nation.  (Applause.)  That’s what’s at stake in this election.    

        I know this has been a tough few years for America.  We’ve seen a lot of stuff in these last three years, and I know that the change we fought for in 2008, as much as we’ve gotten done, we’ve got so much more to do.  And there are times when change just doesn’t come fast enough.  I don’t watch some of these cable news shows and all this sniping, but I imagine if you're sitting back, or, lord knows if you live in a swing state and you're watching these negative ads and -- at a certain point, you must just step back and sort of say, maybe this change we believed in, maybe it's just not possible.  It's tempting to be cynical and say you know what, this just is too hard.

        So I'm here to remind you, I didn’t say it was going to be easy.  I told you real change -- big change -- takes time.  These problems didn’t build up overnight and they're not going to be solved overnight.  It will take more than a single term, more than a single President.  (Applause.)  What it takes is ordinary citizens.  It takes folks like you who are committed to this larger project of making sure that America is constantly moving closer and closer to its highest ideals.  

        Back in 2008, I used to tell you, I'm not a perfect man, I will never be a perfect President.  But I made a promise to everybody.  I said, I will always tell you what I think, I'll tell you where I stand.  And I told you I would wake up every single day fighting for you as hard as I know how.  (Applause.)  And I have kept that promise.  I've kept that promise.  (Applause.)   

        And so if you’re willing to stick with me on this thing, if you're willing to keep pushing through the obstacles, and knocking on doors, and making phone calls, and fighting for what is right, if you're willing to work even harder than we did in 2008, we will finish what we started.  (Applause.)  And we will remind the world just why it is that America is the greatest nation on Earth.

        God bless you.  God bless the United States of America.  (Applause.)

END 6:17 P.M. EDT

THE WHITE HOUSE

Oficina del Secretario de Prensa


PARA PUBLICACIÓN INMEDIATA

9 de abril, 2012 

Hoja informativa: Cooperación en la defensa de EE.UU. y Brasil

Durante su reunión el día 9 de abril de 2012, el Presidente Obama y la Presidenta Rousseff acordaron el establecimiento del Diálogo de Cooperación en la Defensa (DCD, por sus siglas en inglés) de EE.UU. y Brasil, y anunciaron que el Secretario de Defensa Panetta y el Ministro de Defensa Amorim sostendrán su primera reunión del DCD en Brasil el 24 de abril de 2012.  El DCD hará posible una cooperación más solida entre el Departamento de Defensa (DoD, por sus siglas en inglés) de EE.UU. y el Ministerio de Defensa de Brasil, y entre las fuerzas militares de nuestras naciones.  Esta cooperación está más cerca hoy que en ningún momento en más de 35 años, según se destaca en los siguientes ejemplos: 

Acuerdo de Cooperación en la Defensa de EE.UU. y Brasil

  • Este Acuerdo, que fue firmado en abril de 2010 por el entonces Secretario de Defensa Gates y el entonces Ministro de Defensa brasileño Jobim (y pendiente de la ratificación por el Senado de Brasil), promovería la cooperación en áreas tales como investigación y desarrollo, apoyo logístico, seguridad tecnológica, y la adquisición de productos y servicios de defensa.  Además estimularía los intercambios de información, la capacitación y educación militar conjunta, los intercambios de estudiantes e instructores, las visitas de embarcaciones navales, así como iniciativas comerciales relacionadas con la defensa. 

Acuerdo sobre la Seguridad General de la Información Militar

  • Este Acuerdo, que fue firmado en noviembre de 2010 por el Secretario Gates y el Ministro Jobim (y pendiente de la ratificación por el Senado de Brasil), facilitaría compartir la información clasificada de defensa y militar entre los Estados Unidos y Brasil.

Ejercicios e intercambios militares

  • Nuestras fuerzas militares están ampliando hacia nuevas categorías la capacitación que llevan a cabo juntas.  El Cuerpo de Ingenieros del Ejército de EE.UU. ha ampliado su cooperación con sus contrapartes brasileños militares y civiles sobre asuntos de respuesta en caso de desastres y de administración de las aguas.  El personal brasileño participa en talleres internacionales y ejercicios virtuales sobre defensa cibernética patrocinados por el DoD. 
  • Nuestras fuerzas aéreas han expandido su interacción para incluir ejercicios aéreos multinacionales patrocinados por cada país, tales como los ejercicios de BANDERA ROJA DE EE.UU. y de CRUZEX de Brasil.  La marina de EE.UU. y la de Brasil han recibido capacitación conjuntamente en los ejercicios navales de UNITAS durante más de 50 años, y en febrero de 2012 nuestro personal naval sirvió conjuntamente en el ejercicio naval multinacional EXPRESO DE OBANGAME, que se concentró en asuntos de seguridad y protección marítima (tales como el contraataque a la piratería) en el Golfo de Guinea en África.  El EXPRESO DE OBANGAME es un ejemplo del creciente potencial para una mayor cooperación militar entre EE.UU. y Brasil en relación con África que nuestros gobiernos han comenzado a explorar.

Cooperación en Haití

  • A raíz del terremoto ocurrido en enero de 2010, miles de miembros del personal militar de EE.UU. y de Brasil trabajaron conjuntamente para proveer alivio de salvamento al pueblo de Haití.  Ésta fue la mayor operación combinada de las fuerzas militares de EE.UU. y de Brasil desde que peleamos juntos como aliados en la Segunda Guerra Mundial. 

Operaciones humanitarias y de respuesta a desastres

  • El DoD y el Ministerio de Defensa de Brasil, y nuestras fuerzas militares, están analizando nuevas maneras de trabajar en conjunto para aumentar las capacidades nuestras y de otros países para llevar a cabo esas operaciones.  Una propuesta, presentada en la Conferencia de los Ministros de Defensa de las Américas, requiere el desarrollo de un mecanismo de coordinación de respuesta a desastres en todo el hemisferio a través de la Junta de Defensa Interamericana de la Organización de Estados Americanos. 

Super Hornet

  • Los Estados Unidos ha propuesto vender aviones de guerra F/A-18E/F Super Hornet a la fuerza aérea de Brasil.  Esta propuesta, que incluye la transmisión de tecnología sólida, refleja la importancia con la que los Estados Unidos considera su relación con Brasil.  

###

President Obama Speaks on Tax Fairness

April 10, 2012 | 34:32 | Public Domain

President Obama explains why we need the Buffett Rule, which would ensure that people making more than $1 million a year pay at least the same share of their income in taxes as middle-class families.

Download mp4 (1219MB) | mp3 (79MB)

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President on the Economy

Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida

3:05 P.M. EDT

        THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, Florida!  (Applause.)  Thank you!  (Applause.)  How is everybody doing today?  (Applause.)  Well, it is great to be back in Florida.  (Applause.)  It is great to be back in Boca.  (Applause.)  Great to be here at the home of the Fighting Owls.  (Applause.) 

        I want to, first of all, thank Ayden not only for leading us in the Pledge of Allegiance, but also giving me great details about the burrowing owls.  (Laughter.)  He explained it all to me.  And then he told me he wants my job.  (Laughter.)  And I explained to him that the Constitution requires you are 35 years old.  (Laughter.)  So I will keep the seat warm for him --  (applause) -- for a few more years.

        I want to thank Rebecca for that extraordinary performance.  (Applause.)  In addition to having an unbelievable singing voice, she wants to be a teacher -- she is an English major -- and we need great teachers out there, so we're very proud of her.  (Applause.)

        I want to thank your president, M.J. Saunders -- (applause) -- the Mayor of Boca Raton, Susan Whelchel, for hosting us here today.  (Applause.)  We’ve also got our outstanding Senator and former astronaut, which is very cool -- Bill Nelson in the house.  (Applause.)  A wonderful Congressman, Ted Deutch is here.  (Applause.)  And my great friend, Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz is here.  (Applause.)  And you are here, which is very exciting.  (Applause.)  I am glad you guys came out.  Now --

        AUDIENCE MEMBER:  We love you!

        THE PRESIDENT:  I love you back.  (Applause.) 

        Now, look, guys, I know this is a busy time of year.  Some of you are less than a month away from graduation.  (Applause.)   Some seniors in the house.  (Applause.)  Pretty soon, you’ll be closing the books at Wimberly for the last time.  Maybe you’ll be making that one last trip to the beach or Coyote Jack’s.  (Applause.)  You’ll be picking up that diploma that you worked so hard for.  Your parents will be there -- they'll be beaming, full of pride.  And then comes what folks call the real world.

        Now, I actually think college is part of the real world.  But obviously there's a transition that will take place as you leave college.  And some of you may go on to post-graduate degrees, but some of you are going to be out there looking for work.  College is the single-most important investment you can make in your future.  (Applause.)  So I'm proud that you've made it and you've seen it through. 

        But I also know that the future can be uncertain.  Now, we've gone through the three toughest years in our lifetimes, economically -- worst financial crisis, worst economic crisis. Our economy is now recovering but it's not yet where it needs to be.  Too many of your friends and too many of your neighbors are still hurting out there.  They're still looking for work.  Too many of your families are still searching for that sense of security that started slipping away long before this recession hit.

        AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Amen!  (Laughter.) 

        THE PRESIDENT:  Got the "Amen" corner here.  (Laughter.) 

        So at a time like this, we've got to ask ourselves a central, fundamental question as a nation:  What do we have to do to make sure that America is a place where, if you work hard, if you're responsible, that that hard work and that responsibility pays off?  (Applause.)  And the reason it's important to ask this question right now is because there are alternative theories. 

        There's a debate going on in this country right now:  Could we succeed as a nation where a shrinking number of people are doing really, really well, but a growing number are struggling to get by? 

        AUDIENCE:  No!

        THE PRESIDENT:  Or are we better off when everybody gets a fair shot -- (applause) -- and everybody does a fair share, and everybody plays by the same set of rules?  (Applause.)

        That’s what the debate in America is about right now.  This is not just another run-of-the-mill gabfest in Washington.  This is the defining issue of our time.  This is a make-or-break moment for the middle class and everybody who's aspiring to get into the middle class.  And we’ve got two very different visions of our future.  And the choice between them could not be clearer. 

        Now keep in mind, I start from the belief that government cannot and should not try to solve every single problem that we've got.  Government is not the answer to everything.  My first job in Chicago, when I wasn't much older than most of you, was working with a group of Catholic churches on the South Side of Chicago in low-income neighborhoods to try to figure out how could we improve the schools, and how could we strengthen neighborhoods and strengthen families.  And I saw that the work that some of these churches did did more good for people in their communities than any government program could.  (Applause.) 

        In those same communities, I saw that no education policy, no matter how well crafted it is, no matter how well funded it is, can take the place of a parent’s love and attention.  And I also believe that since government is funded by you that it has an obligation to be efficient and effective.  (Applause.)  And that's why we’ve eliminated dozens of programs that weren’t working, announced hundreds of regulatory reforms to save businesses and taxpayers billions of dollars.  We’ve put annual domestic spending on a path to become the smallest share of our economy since Eisenhower was in the White House, which is before I was born much less you being born.  (Laughter.)   

        I believe the free market is the greatest force for economic progress in human history.  (Applause.)  But here’s the thing.  I also agree with our first Republican President -- a guy from my home state, a guy with a beard, named Abraham Lincoln.  (Applause.)  And what Lincoln said was that through our government, we should do together what we cannot do as well for ourselves.  (Applause.)  That's the definition of a smart government.

        And that’s the reason why we have a strong military, to keep us safe -- because I suppose each of us could just grab whatever is around the house and try to defend our country, but we do better when we do it together.  And we’ve got the best military in the history of the world, with the greatest men and women in uniform.  We pay for that.  (Applause.)

        That's why we have public schools to educate our children.  (Applause.)  If we didn't have public schools, there would still be some families who would do very well.  They could afford private schools or some would home-school.  But there would be a lot of kids who would fall through the cracks.  So we do that together.

        It’s one of the reasons that we’ve laid down railroads and highways.  We can't build a highway for ourselves.  We got to get our neighbors and our friends to say let’s go build a road.  That's why we supported the research and the technology that saved lives and created entire industries.  The Internet, GPS -- all those things were created by us together, not by ourselves.

        It’s the reason why we contribute to programs like Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security and unemployment insurance.  (Applause.)  Because we understand that no matter how responsibly we live our lives, we know that eventually we’re going to get older.  We know that at any point, one of us might face hard times, or bad luck, or a crippling illness, or a layoff.  And the idea that together we build this safety net, this base of support, that allows all of us to take risks and to try new things, and maybe try -- get a new job -- because we know that there’s this base that we can draw on.

        So these investments -- in things like education and research and health care -- they haven’t been made as some grand scheme to redistribute wealth from one group to another.  This is not some socialist dream.  They have been made by Democrats and Republicans for generations, because they benefit all of us and they lead to strong and durable economic growth.  That’s why we’ve made these investments.  (Applause.)

        If you’re here at FAU because you got financial aid -- (applause) -- or a student loan, a scholarship -- which, by the way, was how I was able to help finance my college education.  That’s how Michelle got her college education.  That doesn’t just benefit you.  It benefits whatever company might end up hiring you and profiting from your skills.  If one of you goes on to become the next Steve Jobs or Mark Zuckerberg, or one of you discovers the next medical breakthrough, think about all the people whose lives will be changed for the better.  We made an investment in you; we’ll get a return on the investment.  (Applause.)

        When we guarantee basic security for the elderly or the sick or those who are actively looking for work, that doesn’t make us weak.  What makes us weak is when fewer Americans can afford to buy the products that businesses are selling, when fewer people are willing to take risks and start their new business, because if it doesn’t work out they worry about feeding their families.  What drags our entire economy down is when the benefits of economic growth and productivity go only to the few, which is what’s been happening for over a decade now, and gap between those at the very, very top and everybody else keeps growing wider and wider and wider and wider.

        In this country, prosperity has never trickled down from the wealthy few.  Prosperity has always come from the bottom up, from a strong and growing middle class.  (Applause.)  That’s how a generation who went to college on the GI Bill -- including my grandfather -- helped build the most prosperous economy that the world has ever known.  That’s why a CEO like Henry Ford made a point to pay his workers enough money so that they could buy the cars that they were building.  (Applause.)  Because he understood, look, there’s no point in me having all this and then nobody can buy my cars.  I’ve got to pay my workers enough so that they buy the cars, and that in turn creates more business and more prosperity for everybody. 

        This is not about a few people doing well.  We want people to do well.  That’s great.  But it’s about giving everybody the chance to do well.  (Applause.)  That’s the essence of America.  That’s what the American Dream is about.  That’s why immigrants have come to our shores, because the idea was, you know what, it doesn’t matter what your name is, what you look like -- you can be named Obama -- (laughter) -- you can still make it if you try.  (Applause.)

        And yet, we keep on having the same argument with folks who don’t seem to understand how it is that America got built.  And let me just say, the folks that we have political arguments with, they’re Americans who love their country.  Democrats, Republicans, independents, everybody -- we all love this country.  But there is a fundamental difference in how we think we move this country forward. 

        These folks, they keep telling us that if we just weaken regulations that keep our air or our water clean or protect our consumers, if we would just convert these investments that we’re making through our government in education and research and health care -- if we just turned those into tax cuts, especially for the wealthy, then somehow the economy is going to grow stronger.  That’s the theory.

        And here’s the news:  We tried this for eight years before I took office.  We tried it.  (Applause.)  It’s not like we didn’t try it.  (Laughter.)  At the beginning of the last decade, the wealthiest Americans got two huge tax cuts -- 2001, 2003.  Meanwhile, insurance companies, financial institutions -- they were all allowed to write their own rules, or find their way around rules.  We were told the same thing we’re being told now -- this is going to lead to faster job growth.  This is going to lead to greater prosperity for everybody. 

        Guess what -- it didn’t.  (Laughter.)  Yes, the rich got much richer.  Corporations made big profits.  But we also had the slowest job growth in half a century.  The typical American family actually saw their incomes fall by about 6 percent even though the economy was growing, because more and more of that growth was just going to a few, and the average middle-class American wasn't seeing it in their paychecks.  Health care premiums skyrocketed.  Financial institutions started making bets with other people's money that were reckless.  And then our entire financial system almost collapsed.  You remember that?

        AUDIENCE:  Yes!

        THE PRESIDENT:  It wasn't that long ago.  I know you guys are young, but it was pretty recent.  (Laughter.) 

        Now, some of you may be science majors in here.  (Applause.)  I like that.  We need more scientists, need more engineers.  Now, I was not a science major myself, but I enjoyed science when I was young.  And if I recall correctly, if an experiment fails badly -- (laughter) -- you learn from that, right?  Sometimes you can learn from failure.  That’s part of the data that teaches you stuff, that expands our knowledge.  But you don’t then just keep on doing the same thing over and over again.

        AUDIENCE:  No!

        THE PRESIDENT:  You go back to the drawing board.  You try something different.  But that’s not what's been happening with these folks in Washington. 

        AUDIENCE:  No!

        THE PRESIDENT:  A lot of the folks who were peddling these same trickle-down theories -- including members of Congress and some people who are running for a certain office right now, who shall not be named -- (laughter and applause) -- they're doubling down on these old broken-down theories.  Instead of moderating their views even slightly, instead of saying, you know what, what we did really didn’t work and we almost had a second Great Depression, and maybe we should try something different, they have doubled down. 

        They proposed a budget that showers the wealthiest Americans with even more tax cuts, and then pays for these tax cuts by gutting investments in education and medical research and clean energy, in health care.

        AUDIENCE:  Booo -- 

        THE PRESIDENT:  Now, these are the facts.  If the cuts they're proposing are spread out evenly across the budget, then 10 million college students -- including some of you -- would see your financial aid cut by an average of more than $1,000 each.

        AUDIENCE:  Booo!

        THE PRESIDENT:  Now, thousands of medical research grants for things like Alzheimer’s and cancer and AIDS would be eliminated.  Tens of thousands of researchers and students and teachers could lose their jobs.  Our investments in clean energy that are making us less dependent on imported oil would be cut by nearly a fifth.

        AUDIENCE MEMBER:  That's wrong! 

        THE PRESIDENT:  By the time you retire, instead of being enrolled in Medicare like today’s seniors are, you’d get a voucher to pay for your health care plan.  But here’s the problem.  If health care costs rise faster than the amount of the voucher, like they have been for decades, the rest of it comes out of your pockets.  If the voucher isn’t enough to buy a plan with the specific doctors and care that you need, you’re out of luck.  And by the middle of the next century -- by the middle of this century -- excuse me -- by about 2050, at a time when most of you will have families of your own, funding for most of the investments I’ve talked about today would have been almost completely eliminated altogether.  

        Now, this is not an exaggeration.  This is math.  And when I said this about a week ago, the Republicans objected.  They said, we didn't specify all these cuts.  Well, right, you didn't because you knew that people wouldn’t accept them.  So you just gave a big number and so what we’ve done is we’ve just done the math.  This is what it would it mean.

        They say, well, we didn't specifically propose to cut student loans.  Okay, if you don't cut student loans, then that means you’ve got to cut basic research even more.  The money has got to come from somewhere.  You can't give over $4 trillion worth of additional tax cuts, including to folks like me who don't need them and weren’t asking for them, and it just comes from some magic tree somewhere.  (Laughter.)

        So if you hear them saying, well, the President is making this stuff up -- no, we’re doing the math.  If they want to dispute anything that I’ve said right now, they should show us specifically where they would make those cuts.  (Applause.)  They should show us.  They should show us.  Because, by the way, they're not proposing to cut defense, they're actually proposing to increase defense spending, so it’s not coming out of there.  So show me. 

        Look, America has always been a place where anybody who's willing to work and play by the rules can make it.  A place where prosperity doesn’t trickle down from the top, it grows from the bottom; it grows outward from the heart of a vibrant middle class.  (Applause.) 

        And I believe that we cannot stop investing in the things that help create that middle class; that create real, long-lasting, broad-based growth in this country.  And we certainly shouldn’t be doing it just so the richest Americans can get another tax cut.  (Applause.)  We should be strengthening those investments.  We should be making college more affordable.  (Applause.)  We should be expanding our investment in clean energy.  (Applause.)

        Now, here’s the other thing that the Republicans will tell you.  They’ll say, well, we’ve got to make all these drastic cuts because our deficit is too high.  Our deficit is too high.  And their argument might actually have a shred of credibility to it if you didn’t find out that they wanted to spend $4.6 trillion on lower tax rates.  I don’t know how many of you are math majors, business majors -- you can’t pay down a deficit by taking in $4.6 trillion of less money, especially when you’re denying that you’re going to be making all these cuts.  It doesn’t add up.  It doesn’t make sense.

        And keep in mind, more than a trillion dollars of the tax cuts they propose would be going to people who make more than $250,000 a year.  That is an average of at least $150,000 -- again, we’re just taking the numbers with the details they’ve given us and you spread it out -- that averages to at least $150,000 for every millionaire, billionaire in the country.  Each millionaire and billionaire, on average, would get $150,000.  Some folks would get a lot more.

        So we did some math of our own.  We added up all the investments $150,000 could pay for.  All right?  So let’s say a tax break that I might get that I really don’t need -- I’ve got -- treated pretty well in this life.  (Laughter.)  So right now, I’m going to be okay.  Malia, Sasha, they’re going to be able to go to college.  (Applause.)  Michelle is doing fine.  (Applause.)  So understand what this means. 

        Here's what $150,000 means -- $150,000, this is what each millionaire and billionaire would get, on average.  This could pay for a tax credit that would make a year of college more affordable for students like you.  (Applause.)  Plus a year's worth of financial aid for students like you.  (Applause.)  Plus a year's worth of prescription drug savings for one of your grandparents.  (Applause.)  Plus a new computer lab for this school.  (Applause.)  Plus a year of medical care for a veteran in your family who went to war and risked their lives fighting for this country.  (Applause.)  Plus a medical research grant for a chronic disease.  (Applause.)  Plus a year's salary for a firefighter or police officer -- $150,000 could pay for all of these things combined.  Think about that. 

        So let me ask you what's the better way to make our economy stronger?  Do we give another $50,000 [sic] in tax breaks to every millionaire and billionaire in the country?

        AUDIENCE:  No!

        THE PRESIDENT:  Or should we make investments in education and research and health care and our veterans?  (Applause.) 

        And I just want to emphasize again -- look, I want folks to get rich in this country.  I think it's wonderful when people are successful.  That’s part of the American Dream.  It is great that you make a product, you create a service, you do it better than anybody else -- that’s what our system is all about.  But understand, the share of our national income going to the top 1 percent has climbed to levels we haven't seen since the 1920s.  The folks who are benefitting from this are paying taxes at one of the lowest rates in 50 years. 

        You might have heard of this, but Warren Buffett is paying a lower tax rate than his secretary.  Now, that’s wrong.  That’s not fair.  And so we've got to choose which direction we want this country to go in.  Do we want to keep giving those tax breaks to folks like me who don’t need them, or give them to Warren Buffet -- he definitely doesn’t need them -- (laughter)  -- or Bill Gates -- he's already said, I don’t need them.  Or do we want to keep investing in those things that keep our economy growing and keep us secure?  That’s the choice.  (Applause.)

        And, Florida, I’ve told you where I stand.  So now it’s time for members of Congress to tell you where they stand.  In the next few weeks, we’re going to vote on something called the Buffett Rule -- very simple:  If you make more than $1 million a year -- now, I’m not saying you have a million dollars -- right?  I’m not saying you saved up all your money and you made smart investments and now you’ve got your nest egg and you’re preparing for retirement.  I’m saying, you’re bringing in a million bucks or more a year.  Then, what the rule says is you should pay the same percentage of your income in taxes as middle-class families do.  (Applause.)  You shouldn’t get special tax breaks.  You shouldn’t be able to get special loopholes.  (Applause.) 

        And if we do that, then it makes it affordable for us to be able to say for those people who make under $250,000 a year -- like 98 percent of American families do -- then your taxes don’t go up.  (Applause.)  And we can still make those investments in things like student loans and college and science and infrastructure and all the things that make this country great.   

        And this is where you come in.  This is why I came to see you.  I mean, it’s nice to see you.  The weather is nice; you guys have been a wonderful audience.  (Applause.)  I learned about the burrowing owl.  (Applause.)  So there were all kinds of reasons for me to want to come down here.  But one of the reasons I came was I want you to call your members of Congress. I want you to write them an email.  I want you to tweet them.  (Laughter.)  Tell them don’t give tax breaks to folks like me who don’t need them.  Tell them to start investing in the things that will help the economy grow.  Tell them if we want to bring down our deficit sensibly, then we’ve got to do it in a balanced way that’s fair for everybody.  Remind them who they work for.  Tell them to do the right thing.  (Applause.)

        As I look out across this gymnasium, everybody here -- from all different backgrounds, from all different parts of the country -- each of us is here because somebody, somewhere, felt responsibility for other people.  Our parents, obviously, our grandparents, great grandparents, the sacrifices they made -- some of them took enormous risks coming to this country with nothing because they wanted to give a better life to their kids and their grandkids.  (Applause.)  A lot of them did without so that you could benefit.  But they weren't just thinking about their families.  They were thinking about their communities.  They were thinking about their country. 

        That's what responsibility means.  It means that as you have greater and greater opportunity, then the scope of you being able to help more people and think about the future expands.  And so you’re not just thinking about yourself; you’re thinking about your kids, your spouse, your family, your grandkids, your neighborhood, your state, your nation.  You’re thinking about the future. 

        And now it’s our turn to be responsible.  Now it’s our turn to preserve the American Dream for future generations.  Now it’s our turn to rebuild, to make the investments that will assure our future, to make sure that we’ve got the most competitive workforce on Earth, to make sure that we’ve got clean energy that can help clean the planet and help fuel our economy.  (Applause.) 

        It’s our turn.  It’s our turn to rebuild our roads and our bridges and our airports and our ports.  It’s our turn to make sure that everybody here, every child born in whatever neighborhood in this country it is, that if they're willing to dream big dreams and put some blood, sweat and tears behind it, they can make it.  (Applause.)

        I know we can do that.  I know we can do it because of you.  You’re here because you believe in your future.  (Applause.)   You’re working hard.  Some of you are balancing a job or a family on the side.

        AUDIENCE:  Four more years!  Four more years!

        THE PRESIDENT:  You have faith in America.  You know it’s not going to be easy, but you don't give up.  That's the spirit we need right now, because here in America we don’t give up.  (Applause.)  Here in America, we look out for one another.  Here in America, we help each other get ahead.  Here in America, we have a sense of common purpose.  Here in America, we can meet any challenge.  Here in America, we can seize any moment.  We can make this century another great American century.  (Applause.)

        Thank you.  God bless you.  God bless the United States of America.  (Applause.)

END 3:39 P.M. EDT 

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event

Private Residence
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida

1:11 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much.  The only title you forgot was husband of Michelle -- (laughter) -- father of Malia and Sasha and Bo.  (Laughter.) 

I have to, first of all, thank Hansel and Paula for opening up their extraordinary home to us, and your wonderful hospitality.  Please give them a big round of applause.  (Applause.)  Grateful for your friendship and grateful for your support.

A couple other people I want to acknowledge -- first of all, your outstanding Senator from the great state of Florida, Bill Nelson is in the house.  (Applause.)  More importantly, his lovely wife, Grace, is in the house.  (Applause.)  And we also have Congresswoman and head of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz. (Applause.) 

So I'm going to be very brief at the outset because I want to spend most of my time in conversation with you, take questions, get some comments, advice, tips.  But let me just start off by saying it's undeniable we've gone through as tough a three years as we've seen in our lifetimes.  I like to remind people that when I took office that month we lost 800,000 jobs.  We had lost 4 million jobs in the six months preceding me taking office.  We lost another 6 -- another 4 million jobs in the few months right after I took office.  The housing market had collapsed.  The banking system was locked up.  And there was a very real threat that we would tip into a second Great Depression.  And what that meant is we had to act quickly and boldly, and, at times, in ways that weren't popular politically.
 
So the auto industry was on the verge of collapse, which would have meant the loss of a million jobs as well as an iconic industry in the United States that generations of middle-class families had depended on.  And we had to act quickly.  And there were those who said let that industry go bankrupt.  But we said that wouldn’t be the right thing to do; it wouldn’t be good for America long term.

We had to intervene in the banks in ways that got folks on the left and the right upset.  But the fact of the matter is, is that finance is the lifeblood of industry, and had we not been able to unlock financing for large and small businesses alike, we would have seen more and more businesses close. 

We had to pass a Recovery Act.  And there were those who said, why are we going to be helping states keep teachers and police officers on the job, they should be able to handle it themselves.  Why are we helping families on hard times by extending unemployment insurance?  But what I tried to explain was that this was important not just for those individuals who get help, but it was important for the economy as a whole, because we had to make sure that there was enough aggregate demand out there -- at a time when everybody was panicking -- in order to keep the economy moving.

So a lot of tough decisions.  But three years later we can look back and say that we've made progress; that we're moving on the right track.  Over the last two years, we've created over 4 million jobs, 600,000 just in the last quarter alone.  The auto industry has come back -- GM is now the number-one automaker again in the world; recorded the highest profits in its history. Across the board, we're seeing businesses, large and small, starting to hire again and feel a little more confident about the prospects of the economy. 

Now, things are still tough out there and we've still got a long ways to go, but there's no doubt that the economy is getting stronger, businesses are hiring again, the stock market is back. And the question then becomes, how do we build on what we've been able to do over the last several years to deal with some underlying problems that actually preceded the recession?  Because I ran for office in 2008 not just to get back to the status quo; we had put off making some tough decisions for decades on issues that are of critical importance for America to be able to compete in the 21st century.

That’s why we put so much effort into our education system  -- and have prompted reforms in over 40 states who are now, from top to bottom, rethinking how they’re training teachers, how they’re hiring teachers, how they’re holding schools accountable, how instead of teaching to the test we’re unleashing creativity and passion in the classroom, but also making sure that teachers and principals and students are accountable to success -- and how are we going to finance college educations.  We had a student loan system where billions of dollars were actually going to banks to manage loans that were federally guaranteed.  We said let’s just give them straight to students, and as a consequence we’ve opened up affordability for millions of students in need, because my goal is to make sure that once again we’ve got the highest college graduation rate of any country in the world. 

That’s why we took on energy.  And Hansel mentioned -- a model utility, what’s going on down here Florida.  Our goal has been that if we want to succeed in the 21st century that we can’t just depend on one source of energy, and we certainly can’t keep importing oil from some of the most volatile parts of the world. 
And so what have we done?  Over the last three years, because we’ve doubled fuel efficiency standards in cars, because we expanded clean energy investments like no previous administration, we’ve actually seen our oil imports decline to below 50 percent for the first time in 13 years.  Oil production is still up.  I know folks are still struggling with high gas prices, but we’re moving in the right direction, where we can actually potentially achieve energy independence and put folks back to work in the process.

That’s why we took on health care reform -- not only because it’s excusable [sic] to have 30 to 40 million people in a country as wealthy as ours potentially bankrupt every time somebody in their family gets sick, but also because it was breaking the bank for businesses and the government and for individuals. 

And even now, without the health care plan fully implemented, 2.5 million young people have health insurance who didn’t have it before because they can stay on their parent’s plan.  And millions of seniors out there are getting discounts on their prescription drugs.  And everybody can have preventive care as part of their insurance policies, including women getting the preventive care that they need in order to succeed, in order to be healthier. 

And so the point is, is that our goal has not just been to make sure we didn’t go into a depression; our goal is to -- how do we build on the successes that are necessary for us to compete in this 21st century economy that’s going to be tougher than ever.

Now, we got an election coming up -- I don’t know if you guys are aware of that.  (Laughter.)  And let me preface this by saying I’m a firm believer that whether you’re a Democrat or a Republican, that you’re a patriot, you care about this country, you love this country.  And so I’m not somebody who, when we’re in a political contest, suggests somehow that one side or the other has a monopoly on love of country.  But there are contrasting visions here.  And this election will probably have the biggest contrast that we’ve seen maybe since the Johnson-Goldwater election -- maybe before that.  Because my vision, Bill Nelson’s vision, the Democratic vision is one that says that free market is the key to economic growth; that we don’t need to build government just for the sake of expanding its reach; but there are certain things we have to do -- whether it’s investments in education, or basic science and research, or caring for the most vulnerable among us and creating an effective safety net -- that we have to do, because we can’t do it on our own.
 
Each of us individually, the same way that we don’t have privatized fire services or police services or defense, well, there are some things that we’ve got to do together, that we do better together.  And that’s part of how we became an economic powerhouse. 

And the Republicans in this race, they’ve got a fundamentally different idea.  Their basic deal is that if they dismantle government investments in infrastructure or clean energy research, or education, if they give it all away in tax cuts to folks like me and some of you who don’t need them and weren’t even asking for them, that that somehow makes America stronger. 

And I fundamentally disagree.  That’s not how our middle class got built.  That’s not what the G.I. Bill was about.  That’s not what building the Hoover Dam or Golden Gate Bridge was all about.  That’s not what sending -- as Bill knows better than anybody -- a man to the moon was all about.  Our greatness as a nation has always been because we rise together and we have a broad-based prosperity, and we build a middle class where everybody who wants to work hard, everybody who's willing to put all their effort into it, they can make it, regardless of what they look like, where they come from, what their last name is.
 
That’s our vision for America.  That’s what’s at stake in this election.  And I think for all the debate that takes place in Washington, the American people understand that.  And that’s why I’m confident we’re going to win.  But we’re not going to win without your help.  So everybody here is going to have to exhibit the same kind of enthusiasm and energy and passion as you did back in 2008. 

I know I’m a little older and -- (laughter) -- hair is a little grayer.  It may not be as fashionable to be on the Obama bandwagon as it was back then.  But my determination is undiminished, and the need for your involvement is as important as ever.  So if all of you are willing to invest in the future the same way that our parents and our grandparents and our great grandparents invested in the future, I’m confident America’s best days are still ahead.  But we’re going to have to work for it.  We’re going to have to earn it.  And that’s what this election will be all about. 

Thank you very much, everybody.  (Applause.)

END  
1:24 P.M. EDT

The 2012 With House Easter Egg Roll - timelapse

April 10, 2012 | 1:48 | Public Domain

The President and First Lady hosted more than 30,000 from all 50 states on the South Lawn of the White House for the 134th annual Easter Egg Roll. There was singing, there was dancing, there was reading, there were crafts, there were cooking demonstrations,and there was basketball, hula hoops, yoga and, of course, there were Easter eggs.

Download mp4

Time-Lapse Video: The 2012 White House Easter Egg Roll in 1:48

Yesterday the President and First Lady hosted more than 30,000 people from all 50 states on the South Lawn of the White House for the 134th annual Easter Egg Roll. There was singing, there was dancing, there was reading, there were crafts, there were cooking demonstrations,and there was basketball drills, hula hoops, and, of course, there were Easter eggs. WhiteHouse.gov captured it all on camera, and livestreamed the day from several locations around the Lawn for those who couldn't join in person. But it came to our attention that some people found the sheer volume of choices overwhelming, so we packaged it into one 1:48 video. Enjoy!

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney en route West Palm Beach, Florida, 4/10/12

Aboard Air Force One
En Route West Palm Beach, Florida   

10:20 A.M. EDT

MR. CARNEY:  Welcome aboard Air Force One for this trip to Florida today, where the President will have some campaign events.  He will also speak at FAU to talk about the importance of the Buffett Rule, a basic principle of tax fairness the President very much supports.  And he supports the legislation put forward by Senator Whitehouse from Rhode Island, that makes the simple case that millionaires and billionaires in this country who have done exceptionally well over the last many years, and especially in the last 10 years, while middle-class incomes have stagnated or declined, should not pay less or a lower tax rate on their income than average Americans, middle-class Americans.

Of course, that case was famously made by Warren Buffett, a noted billionaire, who found it strikingly unfair when he discovered that he was paying tax on his income at a significantly lower rate than his secretary was paying on hers. 

So we look very much forward to today’s event, the President’s remarks, and to the simple fact that you’re joining us.  And with that, I take your questions.

Q    What’s the likelihood of this Buffett Rule being actually passed this year?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, I talked about this yesterday, Steve, in my briefing.  I think that we certainly understand that it’s a challenge to persuade Republicans in the Senate, in this case, to listen to their constituents who overwhelmingly support the idea of tax fairness, who overwhelmingly support the simple notion that millionaires and billionaires should pay taxes on their income at at least as high a rate as middle-class Americans.

It may be an uphill battle, but it’s not an impossible battle -- not because the President urges them to do so or even because Warren Buffett urges them to do, but because their own constituents are urging them to do so.  And I’ve mentioned this before -- the fact is every member of the House and a third of the Senate is up for -- faces election this fall, and in this case, members of the Senate are going to have to explain to their constituents if they oppose the Buffett Rule why they oppose it
-- why they think that, after years and years of a situation where the tax code has become increasingly rigged in favor of the wealthiest Americans, we should not impose a little fairness on it. 
 
Q    -- tone of the President’s speech today?  Is it going to be a little geared toward the campaign, or more of an official speech? Is he going to be a little feisty?
 
MR. CARNEY:  Well, I’ll let you guys judge the performance aspect of it.  But he will speak very explicitly about why passing the Buffett Rule is important.  I mean, this is a policy speech; this is about tax policy and tax fairness, and it's timed to a vote in the Senate on April 16th.  So I think his remarks at FAU will reflect that.

Q    Jay, a Republican super PAC has an online petition calling for the President to pay more in taxes on a voluntary basis, along with Warren Buffett.  Has the President considered that at all, or do you know if that's something he might do?

MR. CARNEY:  Gimmicks by super PACs funded by multi-millionaires who are advancing an agenda that would protect them from having to pay their fair share in taxes, protect them from having to pay a tax on their income at a rate similar to middle-class Americans, are not things that we take very seriously.  And neither should the American people.  We doubt that they will.

Q    Why not have the President sort of set that example and lead by example?
 
MR. CARNEY:  -- you guys are seriously buying into this gimmick.  And what the President has made clear that he does not believe that people like him who've been fortunate enough to succeed financially should pay taxes at a lower rate than middle-class Americans.  He believes that we should ask people like him to pay a little bit more, people like Warren Buffett and others, millionaires and billionaires who have succeeded, to pay a little bit more.

He is going around the country, as others have noted, making the case for this.  And he's often making the case for this principle, in terms of campaign events, in front of people who fall into the category who would pay more under the President’s proposal and the Buffett Rule.  They also believe that that’s the right thing to do.  It’s a matter of simple fairness.

If you tell a middle-class American who's paying a higher rate on his or her income tax than the multi-millionaires who are funding these super PACs -- you’re asking about whether they’ll be satisfied that we’ve introduced tax fairness in this country if individual millionaires decide to write a check to the Treasury Department or the IRS, then I think they’ll say, no, that is not the measure of fairness that they’re looking for.

Here’s the general thing.  We’ve seen what the Republican plans are.  We’ve seen what the plans are that the super PAC you referred to support.  And it’s not even an esoteric or theoretical exercise.  Those plans were implemented, and look what it led to -- the worst economic and financial crisis in everyone here’s lifetime -- without exception.  Okay?  Look what it led to.  Incomes for the wealthiest Americans in the first decade of the 21st century went up dramatically; incomes for middle-class Americans stagnated or declined dramatically.

We talked a lot about jobs numbers on Friday, the fact that 120,000 jobs created, which made for the best quarter since 2006 in jobs created, came in under expectations, and there was a lot of discussion about whether or not that was a good number or a bad number.  The fact of the matter is under    President George W. Bush, the average monthly job creation figure was 67,000 jobs.  Even if you take out recessionary months, even if you only look at the periods of expansion underGeorge W. Bush, the average monthly job creation was under 100,000 jobs.  At its best, eliminating all recessionary months and quarters, job creation was anemic and tax fairness -- the unfairness in the tax code expanded.

We have tried their proposals.  They didn’t work.  The last thing we need to do is to go back to the things that created the problems in the first place.

Q    Does he plan to call out Mitt Romney by name today in his speech at the university?  And can you tell us, will the Buffett Rule be kind of the dominant theme in the fundraising speeches as well, or will that just be general stuff like usual?

MR. CARNEY:  I don’t have any more of a preview for the President’s remarks at FAU today.  As for his remarks at campaign events, I think they have always included this theme, or often have included this theme.  They will, I assume, today -- he’ll make the same -- generally speaking, the same broad remarks that he makes at campaign events.

Q    Why the decision to travel to Florida to give this speech and outline the argument?  Why Florida?

MR. CARNEY:  Why not Florida?  (Laughter.)

Q    Why Florida?  I mean --

MR. CARNEY:  We’ve traveled around the country -- one of my most recent domestic trips included a stop in Oklahoma.  He gave a major economic speech in Nebraska.  He's given speeches all over the country and will continue to travel all over the country.  Today, Florida is the stop.

Q    Do you have any update on trying to head off North Korea from launching this missile?

MR. CARNEY:  We’re continuing to work with our international partners.  The proposed missile launch, if conducted, would represent a clear and serious violation of North Korea’s obligations under two United Nations Security Council resolutions that explicitly prohibit North Korea from testing ballistic missiles.  We will continue to work with -- we will work with our partners on next steps if North Korea goes through with this provocation, and we continue to urge countries that have influence on North Korea to work to persuade North Korea to consider a different path, the path that would lead to progress towards feeding its people, educating its people, and ending its severe, self-imposed isolation.

Q    Are you saying explicitly that that will include the cutting off of any U.S. food aid?  And can you throw down any other explicit markers of what they will lose if they go forward with this?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, we've said explicitly that it’s impossible to imagine that we would be able to follow through with our -- provide the nutritional assistance that we had planned on providing, given what would be a flagrant violation of its basic -- of North Korea’s basic international obligations.

Beyond that, next steps -- I don't have any information for you.  We'll consult with our allies and partners.

Q    Back to the Buffett Rule.  Given that if it passed, it would make a small dent in the deficit, would you say that the measure is more symbolic than material?

MR. CARNEY:  I think the money we’re talking about here,
$47 billion over 10 years, is nobody’s idea of a small amount, A. B, we never suggested -- the President, no one ever suggested that implementing the Buffett Rule would contribute in large measure to reducing the deficit.  The President has put forward a comprehensive deficit reduction plan that takes a balanced approach, that includes as a principle of tax reform theBuffett Rule, but that does not rely on -- and we never suggested it would rely on -- the Buffett Rule to reduce the deficit by a significant measure.  It is a principle of tax fairness.

And $47 billion is money that in a world of finite resources we could be using to invest in the kind of -- in education, in innovation and in infrastructure, the kind of areas where investments are needed to continue to grow the economy in the 21st century -- areas which, by the way, under the Republican budget would be slashed dramatically in order to give more tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires.

Q    Speaking of deficit reduction, there is this new study by a conservative analyst who the President approved as a Medicare trustee that suggests that the health care law would add $340 billion to the deficit.  And I know there’s a blog post out, but can you speak on the record about this?  What’s your critique of his critique?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, we do not agree with the faulty analysis of a Bush administration National Economic Council member.  We would point to the official estimates by the CBO as well as the OMB that state clearly that the Affordable Care Act would reduce the deficit over the first 10 years and dramatically over the next 10 years.

This is obviously a partisan analysis.  It does not comport with the official presentations put forward by the CBO.  I would note that, since you’ve described him as not a Bush administration official but the President’s appointee, it is a matter of tradition to appoint -- for a President of either party to appoint members of both parties, and this was somebody who was appointed in consultation with Republican leaders in Congress.  It does not mean that the President agrees with his economic analysis.  It certainly means -- he certainly has not changed his opinion and his disagreement with this individual on the need to privatize Social Security, which this individual supports.  So it’s faulty economic analysis.

Q    Jay, on Syria, the foreign minister of Syria said in Moscow today that they’ve begun pulling back troops.  Does the White House have any evidence that those troops are starting to be pulled back in Syria?

MR. CARNEY:  Leaders of the Assad regime say a lot of things, make a lot of promises.  Those promises, overwhelmingly, turned out to be empty.  We judge, and the international community judges the actions of the Assad regime, not their words.  We have seen no evidence thus far of any pullback.  We have seen much evidence of further brutality and aggression against innocent civilians. 

We are waiting for the assessment that Special EnvoyKofi Annan will put forward today at the United Nations.  And we will certainly work with -- in the aftermath of that -- with our partners and others on next steps with regards to Syria.  We would certainly hope that the United Nations Security Council would evaluate the situation in Syria if, in fact, Mr. Annan finds that the Assad regime has not abided by its own commitment to begin withdrawal by today.

Q    Jonathan Pollard has been suffering, according to reports.  Shimon Peres and Benjamin Netanyahu have requested his release.  Do you know if the U.S. has formally rejected that request to release Jonathan Pollard?

MR. CARNEY:  I'm not aware of that request being formally received, but I know that our position has not changed on that case. 

Thank you.

END   
10:34 A.M. EDT