The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by President Obama and Prime Minister Al-Abadi after Bilateral Meeting

Schloss Elmau
Krün, Germany

2:53 P.M. CEST
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, it is a pleasure to be with Prime Minister Abadi and his delegation.  Obviously, the United States has made an enormous commitment and investment in Iraq, and we’re fortunate to have a reliable partner in Prime Minister Abadi.
 
The challenges that Iraq face continue to be significant.  Obviously, ISIL, or Daesh, has been active in its terrorist activities, particularly in Anbar and some of the western portions of the country.  We have seen successes, but we’ve also seen setbacks.  In areas like Tikrit, we’ve seen the Iraqi security forces operate very effectively with the international coalition to drive back ISIL.  Most recently, in Ramadi, we saw ISIL concentrate its forces to get what I believe will be a short-term tactical gain. 
 
What we do know is that our success is going to be dependent on an effective partnership between the international coalition and the Iraqi government.  And that’s why a lot of our discussion today will focus on how we can build on the thousands of Iraqi security forces that we have already trained; how we can coordinate more effectively in getting weapons into the hands of those who are prepared to fight ISIL on a timely basis; how we can ensure that the work that the Prime Minister has done to maintain an inclusive government in Baghdad continues. 
 
And in all of these discussions, what I found is that Prime Minister Abadi is very much committed to effective, inclusive governance.  And there’s a refreshing honesty, I think, on the part of the Prime Minister in recognizing that there remains a lot of work to be done.  But as long as the international coalition sustains its efforts, and as long as Prime Minister Abadi and the Iraqi government stay committed to an inclusive approach to gaining back territory from ISIL and then instituting governance that is inclusive and serves the people, I’m absolutely confident that we will succeed.
 
I just realized I should have provided the translation for that.  That was kind of a long sentence.  Go ahead.
 
So the United States is going to continue to ramp up our training and assistance.  We are going to continue to provide the supplies that are necessary for Iraqi forces to successfully mount offensive campaigns and not simply defensive campaigns inside of Iraq. 
 
In discussions with the G7 and other coalition partners, they’re absolutely committed to making sure that the Iraqi government can succeed in this process.  And I’m confident that although it is going to take time and there will be setbacks and lessons learned, that we are going to be successful, ISIL is going to be drive out of Iraq, and ultimately it is going to be defeated.
 
PRIME MINISTER ABADI:  (As interpreted.)  I would like to thank President Obama and the United States, and the G7 countries, and the global coalition against ISIL for standing side by side with Iraq to defeat Daesh. 
 
We are fighting several fights and combats against ISIL.  We have won many rounds against ISIL.  One round we lost was in Ramadi, but I say that we lost it only temporarily.  And the Iraqi security forces and the Popular Mobilization Forces, all under the leadership of the commander-in-chief and the leadership of the Iraqi government, has taken control of the situation and are endeavoring very hard to liberate all the land in Iraq that is confiscated.  And we have liberated a space and amount of land in Iraq that is many folds more than what they have in Ramadi.
 
And very frankly, Iraqis are fighting other land and they are fighting with the international community.  And the United States, standing side by side with Iraq -- and that is very important because the fight there is one that is a psychological war and a moral war, and we will continue our efforts to defeat ISIL. 

Undoubtedly, we will win the war -- we will win the war over ISIS that has a bad ideology, an ideology that is attempting at sabotaging archeological sites and killing citizens, and targeting and killing minorities, and causing destruction in Sunni cities.  Of course, ISIS is fully (inaudible) on anything that has to do with the Sunnis, because ISIS ideology is a false one.  And we shall be victorious.
 
Thank God, we are working on including all the components of the Iraqi people and we are continuing this effort.  And our sons and our populations in Ramadi, those who fled the war scenes, come back to areas that are under the control of the Iraqi government.  We welcome them, and we will continue to help them and do everything for them.
 
And as we fight Daesh in Ramadi, and we endeavor and work hard to expulse Daesh from that region, we sent two brigades to Mosul in order to put the area under -- the perimeter of the area under siege and to drive Daesh out of Ninawa.
 
The problem resides in the foreign fighters, the influx of foreign fighters that goes into Syria and into Iraq, and it creates more of the bloodshed, more of the destruction, and the bloodshed and blood-spilling of the innocents.  This is what we discussed today and raised this issue at the G7 today.  And this will require the effort and the mobilization of the international community to address.
 
Just to give an example and an idea -- 40 suicide bombers conduct operations and they kill many -- and many of them are killed, but these people are from outside and they are coming from outside Iraq.
 
Also, another thing is that ISIL smuggles oil and tries to generate revenue out of oil smuggling and to generate and funnel money into its terrorist activities.  To stop this activity of ISIL, this will require the effort of the international community.  We also see that a mobilization is needed by the international community to stop ISIL from recruiting.  ISIL recruiting must be stopped, and this can be done by a global intelligence-sharing effort.  Iraq cannot do it alone.  It doesn’t have the resources.  But along with our global partners, we can do it.
 
We believe that by protecting the Iraqis and our citizens, and with the help of our allies, with the help of the global community, the international community, and the G7, we will be able to defeat ISIL and be victorious in Iraq. 
 
Thank you, Mr. President.
 
PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Thank you, everybody.

END
3:08 P.M. CEST

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

FACT SHEET: The 2015 G-7 Summit at Schloss Elmau, Germany

The President met with the other Leaders of the G-7 at Schloss Elmau, Germany on June 7-8 to make tangible progress on a wide range of economic, security, and development priorities.  The G-7 stands resolved in its commitment to uphold the values of freedom and democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights, and the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Promoting Peace and International Security

This year marks the second G-7 Summit since Russia’s participation was suspended in response to its actions in Ukraine.  G-7 Leaders remain united in support of the efforts of the people of Ukraine to strengthen their economy and to build a deeper and stronger democracy that accommodates the rights and aspirations of all people in all regions of Ukraine.  G-7 Leaders also expressed their resolve to work together to address other ongoing international security challenges and promote peace and stability globally.  

  • Russia and Ukraine:  G-7 Leaders reaffirmed their support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine and their condemnation and policy of non-recognition of Russia’s occupation and attempted annexation of Crimea.  The G-7 remains focused on supporting a diplomatic solution based on the Minsk agreements of September 2014 and February 2015.  Further, the Leaders called for an end to Russia’s ongoing materiel and military support to the separatists, and reaffirmed that sanctions can be rolled back only after full implementation of the Minsk agreements.  The Leaders also agreed that the G-7 stands ready to take further restrictive measures in order to increase costs on Russia if necessary.

Additionally, the Leaders confirmed their commitment to work alongside international financial institutions to provide the economic support and technical assistance Ukraine needs as it implements reforms that will transform its economy and make its democracy more responsive to the Ukrainian people.  G-7 Leaders welcomed the significant steps Ukraine has taken in recent weeks to advance its reform agenda in line with this new IMF program.

  • Iran:  The G-7 affirmed the political understanding on the key parameters of a Joint Comprehensive Plan of action reached by the P5+1 and Iran in early April.  G-7 Leaders pledged to provide continued support to the P5+1 as it seeks to achieve a comprehensive solution that verifies the exclusively peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear program and ensures that Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon.  All G-7 governments call on Iran to cooperate fully with the International Atomic Energy Agency to address all outstanding issues, including those relating to the possible military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear program.

  • Libya:  G-7 Leaders reiterated their staunch support for the U.N.-led efforts to forge a political resolution to the conflict in Libya and to help form a national unity government. They commended the leadership of those Libyans who are taking steps to deescalate violence through dialogue, and reiterated that spoilers who seek to undermine reconciliation efforts will be held accountable.  They affirmed their readiness to substantially increase their support to a prospective new unity government to help it meet the aspirations of all Libyans and counter pressing terrorist threats in Libya.

  • Counterterrorism:  The G-7 Leaders re-affirmed their commitment to countering terrorist threats and the sources of extremism wherever they reside.  They expressed strong support for the leadership and determination of Iraqi Prime Minister Al-Abadi, Tunisian President Caid Essebsi, and Nigerian President Buhari, who were all present at the Summit, to confront extremist challenges, including those associated with the ISIL, threatening the peace, stability, and security of their countries.  To this end, the G-7 committed to work together and with other international partners to develop a more systematic approach to direct, coordinate, and de-conflict the provision of counterterrorism and countering violent extremism resources to key partner nations and regions.

Achieving Strong, Sustainable, and Balanced Global Economic Growth

G-7 Leaders reiterated key policy commitments to support the global economy, including commitments to market-determined exchange rates and to implement fiscal strategies flexibly to support growth and job creation.  Leaders also emphasized the importance of protecting intellectual property rights, and the need to continue progress on efforts in the G-20 to strengthen the international financial system, combat tax evasion and eliminate incentives for tax avoidance. 

Promoting High-Standard Trade and Investment

The United States is currently negotiating high-standard trade agreements with all other G-7 countries—Canada and Japan in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), and Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Italy in the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (T-TIP).  Leaders resolved to make every effort to finalize negotiations on the TPP as soon as possible, and to accelerate work on all T-TIP issues, ensuring progress in all the elements of the negotiations, with the goal of finalizing understandings on the outline of an agreement as soon as possible, preferably by the end of the year. 

  • WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement:  The United States was among the first countries to complete domestic acceptance procedures for the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement, and the other G-7 Leaders decided to make every effort to complete their own domestic ratification processes by the time of the 10th WTO Ministerial Conference this December in Nairobi.  Also formally accepted by Japan last month, this historic agreement—the first fully multilateral agreement to be concluded since the WTO’s inception 20 years ago—will eliminate red tape and bureaucratic delay for merchandise shipped around the world, unlocking potentially hundreds of billions of dollars in global economic value once it enters into force. The agreement does not enter into force until two-thirds of the WTO’s membership (or 108 countries) ratify it.

  • Concluding the Doha Round:  The United States and other G-7 countries emphasized the importance of swiftly concluding the WTO post-Bali work program and reaching agreement on the Doha Round by the end of the year.  G-7 countries shared the view that implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement and agreement on a post-Bali work program would set the stage for a successful upcoming 10th WTO Ministerial Conference.

  • Promoting High Standards in Global Supply Chains:  G-7 Leaders decided on meaningful actions to improve worker rights in international supply chains and help create a level playing field for labor.  In particular, G-7 members will encourage multinational enterprises to implement due diligence procedures regarding their supply chains and strengthen multi-stakeholder initiatives, building upon similar efforts undertaken in the aftermath of the Rana Plaza building collapse.  The United States has bolstered these efforts by working to prevent human trafficking in Federal contractors’ supply chains, and by developing a National Action Plan to promote responsible business conduct overseas.  G-7 Leaders also welcomed the creation of a Vision Zero Fund administered by the International Labor Organization (ILO), which aims to prevent and reduce workplace-related deaths and serious injuries and will complement the United States’ ongoing partnership with the ILO on its new Global Initiative on Occupational Safety and Health.

Addressing Climate Change, Protecting the Environment, and Boosting Energy Security

Leaders affirmed their strong determination to reach a successful climate agreement this December at the United Nations Climate Conference in Paris.  To help advance this objective, all G-7 countries have now announced or proposed post-2020 climate targets, including the U.S. target to cut carbon pollution by 26-28 percent from 2005 levels by 2025.  G-7 Leaders encouraged other countries who have not yet announced post-2020 targets to do so well in advance of the Paris conference.  Recognizing that these targets are only a next step, G-7 Leaders also articulated a long-term vision for decarbonizing our economies by the end of the century, as well as the need to be ambitious in setting goals for cutting carbon by 2050 in line with scientific evidence.  The Leaders also announced the following concrete steps to address climate change, protect the environment, and boost energy security.

  • Incorporating Climate Resilience Considerations into Development Assistance:  Leaders pledged to incorporate climate change mitigation and resilience considerations into development assistance and investment decisions, a major step that builds on the “Climate-Resilient International Development” Executive Order issued by President Obama in September 2014.  The United States has provided significant financial support for adaptation activities in developing countries, and such dedicated funding is critical.  At the same time, the magnitude of the challenge requires not just dedicated adaptation finance flows but also a broader, integrated approach in which all relevant decisions on development support take climate impacts and mitigation opportunities into consideration. 

  • Expanding Climate Risk Insurance in Developing Countries:  The G-7 announced action to support efforts by vulnerable developing countries to manage climate change-related disaster risk through insurance, with an aim to increase the number of people with access to direct or indirect climate risk insurance coverage by up to 400 million by 2020.  This commitment will build upon existing risk insurance facilities such as the Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility (CCRIF).  In 2014, the United States contributed $10 million to support expansion of catastrophe risk insurance coverage through the CCRIF to Central American countries. 

  • Mobilizing Clean Energy Finance in Africa:  Climate finance has already risen to unprecedented levels, and Leaders reaffirmed their support to jointly mobilize climate finance. In this regard, the G-7 announced an initiative to coordinate efforts to increase access to clean energy in Africa, including by mobilizing financial resources from private investors, such as through instruments selected by the Global Innovation Lab for Climate Finance.  In announcing this new initiative, G-7 Leaders indicated their intent to build on the progress that has been made by the United States’ Power Africa initiative, which President Obama launched in 2013 with the goal of doubling access to electricity in sub-Saharan Africa, and which has leveraged more than $20 billion in private sector commitments toward this goal. 

  • Addressing Short-Lived Climate Pollutants:  G-7 Leaders committed to continue efforts to phase down hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and to negotiate an amendment to the Montreal Protocol this year, as well as to assist developing countries in implementing such an amendment.  Consistent with the goal of reducing HFC use, the United States is expanding the list of climate-friendly alternatives to HFCs, and proposed to prohibit the use of certain HFCs for specific applications.  Last fall, the Obama Administration announced private-sector commitments to reduce HFCs by the equivalent of 700 million metric tons of carbon dioxide through 2025, equivalent to 1.5 percent of the world’s 2010 greenhouse gas emissions and the same as taking nearly 15 million cars off the road for 10 years. 

  • Reducing Incentives for Carbon-Intensive Investments:  Promoting green finance flows requires a complementary commitment to reducing incentives for high-carbon investment and aligning official financing practices with climate objectives, including in the work of export credit agencies.  G-7 Leaders reaffirmed their commitment to eliminate inefficient fossil fuel subsidies and to continued progress in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to shift export credit flows away from carbon intensive investment.  In 2013, the United States became the first country to end public financing, including through export credit support, for new conventional coal plants overseas except in rare circumstances.  Other G-7 countries have since adopted policies in this area.

  • Building on the Rome Energy Security Initiative:  G-7 Leaders reaffirmed their commitment from 2014 to principles for energy security and specific actions under the Rome G-7 Energy Initiative, which they will continue.  Key elements include reaffirming support for Ukraine and other vulnerable countries and reiterating that energy should not be used as a means of political coercion; continuing work on assessment of energy system vulnerabilities; and furthering diversification through the energy mix, fuels, sources, and routes.  Leaders decided on the need to further assess vulnerabilities of our electricity systems, including cross-border flows, supply disruptions, demand response, and infrastructure.

  • Launching New Work on Energy Sector Cybersecurity:  The backbone of the energy sector is a network of electronic processes that assure energy is produced and distributed to the people and infrastructure that drive our economies.  Cyber threats to these energy delivery systems are becoming increasingly complex and sophisticated.  Consequently, G-7 Leaders launched a new cooperative effort to enhance cybersecurity of the energy sector.  This new work should include analysis of different approaches across the G-7; exchange of methodologies for identifying cyber threats, vulnerabilities, and best practices; and investment in cybersecurity capabilities and capacity building. 

  • Combating Marine Litter:  G-7 leaders committed to combat marine litter from land-based and marine sources, address debris removal, and focus on education, research and outreach.  This work builds on existing U.S. efforts to reduce the volume of litter entering water bodies from land and sea-based sources and to remove marine debris from coastal areas.  A significant volume of marine litter, especially plastics, enters the ocean from land-based sources in the developing world due to inadequate waste management systems.  The G-7 committed to incorporate waste management activities into international development assistance, support implementing pilot projects to reduce waste entering water streams, encourage industry to develop sustainable packaging, and promote best practices along the whole plastics manufacturing value chain.  These initiatives will be advanced through a series of G-7 workshops in advance of the second Our Ocean conference in October 2015 in Chile.  U.S. national programs are actively supporting state and municipal litter reduction programs, conducting research on sources and impacts of marine debris, exploring innovative source reduction opportunities, and expanding public awareness.  

  • Promoting Resource Efficiency:  G-7 Leaders announced an Alliance on Resource Efficiency to share knowledge and create information networks on a voluntary basis with businesses, small and medium-sized enterprises, and other relevant stakeholders to advance resource efficiency, promote best practices, and foster innovation. 

Supporting Sustainable Development

2015 is a landmark year for development.  The United States and the G-7 expressed their commitment to achieving a successful outcome in the Third International Conference on Financing for Development in July and the UN Summit for the adoption of the Post-2015 Development Agenda in September 2015, which will set the global sustainable development agenda for the next 15 years.  G-7 Leaders also announced several steps to advance key development priorities.

  • Post-2015 Development Agenda:  G-7 Leaders reaffirmed their commitment to achieving an ambitious and universal Post-2015 Development Agenda that integrates the three dimensions of sustainable development – environmental, economic, and social – in a balanced manner and anchored in a set of clear and measurable goals and targets, that finish the unfinished business of the Millennium Development Goals, eradicate extreme poverty, reduce inequality, put us on our a more sustainable path, and strengthen peace and governance.  G-7 Leaders also reaffirmed their political commitment to achieving a successful outcome at the Third International Financing for Development Conference in Addis Ababa, and collectively committed to support measures that will help enable developing countries to meet the post-2015 sustainable development goals, including through domestic resource mobilization, private capital, assistance, and an ambitious policy framework.  Leaders also reaffirmed the essential role that official development assistance (ODA) and other international public finance play as a catalyst for, and complement to, other sources of financing for development.  The United States continues to underscore the importance of allocating more of total assistance where needs are greatest and capacity to raise public resources domestically and internationally weakest, including Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and fragile and conflict-affected states.  To that end, G-7 Leaders reaffirmed their commitment to reverse the declining trend of ODA to the LDCs.

  • Advancing Food Security and Nutrition: In support of the forthcoming Sustainable Development Goals and as part of a broad effort involving partner countries and international actors, G-7 governments aim to lift 500 million people in developing countries out of hunger and malnutrition by 2030, including by promoting sustainable agriculture and nutrition investments.  Through President Obama’s Feed the Future initiative, the United States is already making significant contributions to this goal:  last year, Feed the Future helped smallholder farmers earn over $530 million in new sales, and delivered nutrition interventions for more than 12.5 million children.  The United States also remains committed to achieving the goals of the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition, under which more than 250 global and local companies have committed more than $10 billion in agricultural investment in Africa to date, and the goals of the Nutrition for Growth Compact, under which the United States announced $10 billion for nutrition programming over three years.  And as a founding member of the Global Alliance for Climate Smart Agriculture, the United States is committed to promoting best practices for climate-smart food security by increasing agricultural production, adapting to a changing climate through innovative solutions, and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture.

  • Strengthening Assistance for Complex Contracts Negotiations (CONNEX):  G-7 Leaders endorsed a Code of Conduct for assistance to developing countries for negotiating complex contracts with multinational enterprises, initially focusing on the extractives sector.  They also encouraged support providers and other relevant stakeholders to incorporate the Code as a set of binding principles in their contracts worldwide.  The United States and G-7 partners will further encourage existing support providers to enter into pilot projects that incorporate the Code of Conduct and welcome knowledge sharing platforms for developing countries through portals like the U.S. government funded www.negotiationsupport.org and through peer learning on negotiation support.

Advancing Global Health and the Global Health Security Agenda

The Ebola epidemic underscored the importance of strong health systems and the urgency with which the global community must act to establish capacity in every country to prevent, detect and respond to biological threats, whether naturally occurring, deliberate or accidental.  At Schloss Elmau, G-7 Leaders committed to take action to attain zero Ebola cases, assist with recovery in West Africa, and enhance crisis response for epidemics, as well as to fight antimicrobial resistance, combat neglected tropical diseases, and advance the Global Health Security Agenda, including by establishing the capacity required to achieve the Agenda’s targets in at least 60 countries.

  • Achieving Zero Ebola Cases and Supporting Recovery:  The G-7 remains committed to achieving zero Ebola cases and pledged to assist Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone to recover from the Ebola epidemic.  To improve the global emergency response system, G-7 Leaders also supported steps to strengthen the WHO’s capacity and to draw upon the lessons learned from the Ebola crisis, as well as new approaches from the WHO, International Monetary Fund, and World Bank, to recommend enhanced approaches to disburse response capacity.  The G-7 has led the response to end the Ebola epidemic in West Africa, with a combined G-7 contribution of over $2.6 billion in assistance to date. 

  • Advancing the Global Health Security Agenda – Assisting At Least 60 Countries and Encouraging All Partners to Join:  At Schloss Elmau, the G-7 made a historic, collective commitment to assist at least 60 countries over the next five years, including the countries of West Africa, to achieve the targets of the Global Health Security Agenda and the World Health Organization International Health Regulations.  This commitment reflects a match of the United States’ commitment to assisting at least 30 countries, and the G-7 called on others to join this effort to synchronize assistance and close the gaps in the most vulnerable countries.  This agreement reflects the need to change the way assistance is delivered to assure that all countries have the capacities in place to prevent, detect and rapidly respond to biological threats, whether naturally occurring, intentional or accidental.  Last year, the G-7 endorsed the Global Health Security Agenda, which was launched in February 2014 to accelerate action and to achieve concrete targets.  On September 26, 2014, President Obama convened 44 countries at the White House to highlight over 100 new commitments to advance the Agenda.  In concert with these efforts, the World Health Assembly recently endorsed a timeframe to support at-risk countries by 2019 to achieve the needed capacity to prevent, detect and respond to biological threats.  The G-7 called on partners around the world to aid in achieving this goal.  Finland currently Chairs the GHSA, and in September in Seoul under the leadership of the Republic of Korea, partner countries of the Global Heath Security Agenda will come together to highlight concrete commitments and next steps to synchronize assistance.

  • Countering Anti-Microbial Resistance (AMR):  At Schloss Elmau, Leaders announced their intent to prioritize national and global action to counter AMR by: fostering the prudent use of medically important antibiotics; phasing out the use of medically important antibiotics for growth promotion in animals; and enhancing research and development for new antibiotics, therapeutics, vaccines, and diagnostics.  G-7 Leaders also committed to develop and share national action plans, such as the Obama Administration’s “National Strategy for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria.”  This work in the G-7 will also build upon President Obama’s September 2014 Executive Order and will continue the momentum from the White House Forum on Antibiotic Stewardship held earlier this month. 

  • Supporting Gavi and the Global Fund:  G-7 Leaders welcomed the $7.5 billion replenishment of Gavi, the Global Vaccine Alliance, to vaccinate an additional 300 million children by 2020.  This included a pledge of $1 billion over four years from the United States.  In addition, G-7 Leaders look forward to a successful replenishment of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria in 2016. 

  • Fighting Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs):  G-7 Leaders will continue to fight neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) by strengthening community-based approaches to distribute therapies, fully leveraging drug donation programs, and enhancing research, development, and targeting for drugs, vaccines and point-of-care technologies.  Since 2007, USAID’s NTD Program has supported the delivery of more than 1 billion treatments for NTDs.   

Advancing Women’s Economic Empowerment

G-7 Leaders are committed to advancing women’s economic empowerment both at home and around the world.  Leaders realize that in order to do so, they must address discrimination, sexual harassment, violence against women and girls, and other cultural, social economic and legal barriers to women’s economic participation.  At this year’s G-7 Summit, Leaders reaffirmed their commitment to reduce the gender gap in workforce participation, and announced the creation of a G-7 working group to advance progress on these new initiatives.

  • Women’s Entrepreneurship:  The Leaders articulated a set of principles specific to increasing the number of women entrepreneurs, including through efforts to increase women and girls’ awareness of the possibility to start businesses and to facilitate tailored training and resources to empower women as entrepreneurs. 

  • Women’s Technical and Vocational Training:  In a further effort to increase women’s workforce participation, G-7 Leaders committed to increase the number of women in developing countries receiving technical and vocational education and training through G-7 assistance by one-third by 2030. 

This work complements ongoing United States efforts to support women and girls around the world.  Through the National Action Plan for Women, Peace, and Security, the United States is working to ensure that women are empowered as peace-builders, protected from violence in conflict, and receive access to relief and recovery resources in times of crisis.  The U.S. Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-based Violence Globally coordinates U.S. Department and Agencies in efforts to address the gender-based violence that prevents too many women from participating in the workforce and other aspects of public life.   The Equal Futures Partnership, launched by the United States in 2012, brings together 27 countries, including G-7 members Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the European Union, to make domestic commitments related to women’s political and economic empowerment.  Finally, through the Let Girls Learn Initiative, we are increasing our efforts to ensure that girls around the world complete secondary education and are prepared to enter the workforce. 

The United States has also shown sustained commitment to improving work-life balance and to making work pay for women through its support of efforts to expand paid leave, raise the minimum wage, and ensure equal pay.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Annex to the G-7 Leaders’ Declaration

Schloss Elmau, Germany

June 8, 2015

G7 Principles on Women’s Entrepreneurship

  • Make girls and women aware of the possibility of becoming entrepreneurs and actively encourage them to transform their ideas into business cases – starting at early stages, e.g. in schools, vocational training and universities by promoting tailored information.
  • Counter gender stereotyping, and develop specific measures for girls to enroll in and complete education in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) disciplines early on.
  • Make successful female entrepreneurs more visible, e.g. as role models for new generations of women founders.
  • Address the specific needs of female entrepreneurs, e.g. by providing them with tailored information, skills, mentoring and coaching and promoting networks for women entrepreneurs.
  • Facilitate women entrepreneurs’ access to finance, e.g. alternative sources of funding as well as the banking system, to technology and innovation and to domestic and international markets.
  • Improve framework conditions, e.g. by providing ample policies to support the reconciliation of work and family life for both men and women, including access to parental leave and childcare.

Joint Efforts to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)

The G7 strongly supports the first Global Action Plan by the World Health Organization (WHO) on Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). We will develop or review, operationalize and share our national action plans and keep up our cooperation with various organizations and stakeholders with a focus on the areas listed below:

Combating AMR has to be addressed in a two-fold approach: by conserving the effectiveness of existing and future antimicrobials and by engaging in research and development for new antimicrobials, vaccines, treatment alternatives and rapid diagnostic tools.

  • We are strongly committed to the One Health approach, encompassing all areas of human and animal health as well as agriculture and the environment. Our national action plans will be based on this concept.
  • We have a responsibility to improve the prevention of infectious diseases as well as to be more prudent when using antimicrobials. To achieve this we need a holistic approach and concrete measures to retain the effectiveness of antimicrobial agents. We encourage and support other countries to join these efforts.
  • We will specifically foster the prudent use of antibiotics1 by committing to use them for therapeutic reasons under supervision in compliance with national and or jurisdictional legislation and after individual diagnosis. We will increase knowledge and responsible use through the implementation of stewardship programmes for medical and veterinary professionals as well as livestock producers.
  • We highlight the importance of antibiotics in human and veterinary medicine which should be available through prescription or the veterinary equivalent only, and the fact the appropriate use of antibiotics contributes to the reduction of antimicrobial resistance.
  • We flag the need to phase out the use of antibiotics for growth promotion in animal husbandry in the absence of risk analysis.
  • We recognize the importance of increasing awareness and knowledge of prevention and control of infections and on AMR among human and animal health professionals and the general public.
  • We need to strengthen surveillance of existing and emerging patterns of AMR in medical, veterinary and agricultural settings and via environmental pathways in order to fill knowledge gaps in the interest of effective strategies to fight AMR.
  • We have to stimulate innovation by increasing basic research, research on epidemiology, and the development and access of new antimicrobials, alternative therapies, vaccines, and rapid point of care diagnostics and we take note of the Independent Review on AMR.
  • In this context we are committed to intensifying our dialogue with the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and food industries which plays a vital role in our close collaboration with the WHO, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
  • We call on our Ministers to pool the national efforts and hold a G7-Meeting in order to promote responsible use of antibiotics among all relevant stakeholders and share best practices.

Climate Policy

Climate Risk Insurance Initiative

Effective climate risk management that aims to build resilience to the impact of climate change especially for poor and vulnerable people in highly exposed and low-income countries needs to encompass disaster risk reduction, adaptation to climate change and insurance to cover a portion of the residual risks that arise from natural hazards and extreme weather events.

Objective

The overall objective of the G7 initiative is to stimulate the creation of effective climate risk insurance solutions and markets and the smart use of insurance-related schemes for people and assets at risk in poor and vulnerable developing countries. This enables climate change adaptation and contributes to enhancing economic growth, poverty reduction and climate resilience.

The G7 climate risk insurance initiative aims to increase the number of people benefiting from direct or indirect insurance covering the negative impacts of climate change induced hazards in low and middle-income countries by up to 400 million by 2020, including by building on existing risk insurance facilities in Africa, Asia, Small Island Developing States, Latin America and the Caribbean.

A climate risk transfer approach will strengthen the enabling environment for insurance in combination with awareness-raising measures to promote insurability. The initiative intends to make use of synergies with related international policy frameworks such as UNFCCC and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.

Initiative for Renewable Energy in Africa

Africa is endowed with vast renewable energy resources. However, half of the world’s un-electrified households are in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite significant recent improvements in increasing energy access, the IEA estimates that 645 million people in sub-Sahara Africa will be without access to energy in 2030. Improving access to affordable energy services and thereby reducing energy poverty is an important objective in which a clean energy agenda can play an important role. In this respect, developing regional renewable energy resources effectively utilizing all available resources could serve as the main driver to increase African energy generation and unlock potential for the future.

Objective

The aim of this effort is to improve sustainable energy access in Africa by 2030 by accelerating the deployment of renewable energy (solar, onshore and offshore wind power, hydro, biomass and geothermal, off-grid renewables, and grid and corridors deployment). This initiative is intended to scale up existing initiatives and aims to reach up to 10,000 MW in additional installed renewables capacity by 2020. It would identify and support the bankability of renewable energy projects in Africa, based on national and regional investment plans. It is possible to build on existing multilateral and bilateral programmes – most notably the UN “Sustainable Energy for All SE4All”, IRENA “Africa clean energy corridor” and UNEP initiatives, Africa-EU Energy Partnership, African Union, NEPAD, AMCEN and AfDB flagship programmes including the African Power Vision, the U.S. “Power Africa” initiative and the EU’s Electrification Financing Initiative (ElectriFi). This initiative aims to strengthen coordination between existing efforts and to highlight gaps where future work is needed. It should constitute an integral component of the international efforts to ensure universal access to affordable, reliable and safe and clean energy for all. The G7 aims to use existing financial institutions, i.e. MDBs/DFIs and the Green Climate Fund, and target specific challenges to private investments in climate technologies, i.e. financial and political risks, limited local project development capacity, and weak regulatory framework and sector policies.

The initiative will also include innovative instruments as well as scaling up existing successful programs, including but not limited to the “Global Innovation Lab for Climate Finance” (the Lab) which supports the identification and piloting of innovative climate finance instruments aiming to drive private investments into renewable energy and energy efficiency in developing countries.

Method

Backed by the political commitment of the G7 in Elmau to coordinate efforts to accelerate the development of clean energy in Africa, the African Union, French COP 21 presidency and German G7 presidency in consultation with other G7 members will develop a common plan for further action. The action plan will be worked out in close cooperation with UNEP and the World Bank engaging other relevant stakeholders and presented at the ministerial meeting on climate finance that will take place in Lima during the IMF/World Bank 2015 Annual Meetings as a decisive milestone on the road to COP21 in Paris.

Alliance on Resource Efficiency

At the global level, the consumption of natural resources and production of waste have increased to a greater scale than ever before. Data indicate that global raw material use rose during the 20th century at about twice the rate of population growth. For every 1% increase in GDP, raw material use has risen by 0.4%. Furthermore, much of the raw material input in industrial economies is returned to the environment as waste within one year. Although there has been some relative decoupling of economic growth and natural resource use, it is insufficient to overcome the even higher demands we face with a projected world population of more than 9 billion people by 2050 and rapid economic growth in newly industrializing countries.

Unsustainable consumption of natural resources and concomitant environmental degradation translates into increasing business risks through higher material costs, as well as supply uncertainties and disruptions. Against this background, improving resource efficiency and managing materials sustainably throughout their life cycles are important elements of delivering environmental and climate protection, employment, social benefits and sustainable green growth. Resource efficiency offers opportunities to reduce the burden on the environment while strengthening the sustainability, competitiveness and growth of the economy. This should be a part of broader strategies to promote sustainable materials management and material-cycle societies. Improving resource efficiency requires the productive collaboration amongst policy-makers, business, academia, and consumers.

Commitment to Ambitious Action

We reaffirm the high importance of the protection and efficient use of natural resources throughout their life cycle and the positive impact on all three equally important dimensions of sustainability – economic, environment and social aspects. Life-cycle-based decision-making can help focus attention on natural resources and/or sectors with significant potential. We will continue to take ambitious action to improve resource-efficiency, building on existing national and regional initiatives, including the Kobe 3R Action Plan (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) and reflecting international developments. In doing so, we will be strengthening the competitiveness of industries, safeguarding jobs and boosting environmental protection. Prior to the next G7 meeting, we will share progress on our activities.

G7-Alliance on Resource Efficiency

We establishing a G7 Alliance on Resource Efficiency, which will provide a forum to exchange and promote best practices and foster innovation together with business (Business 7) and other stakeholders, including from the public sector, research institutions, academia, consumers and civil society, on a voluntary, non-binding basis. The Alliance will benefit from actively engaging, with, for example, relevant business initiatives and supporting networks. The G7 Alliance on Resource Efficiency aims to promote an exchange of concepts on how to address the challenges of resource efficiency, to share best practices and experience, and to create information networks.

A series of workshops on best practices will initiate this process. Subjects to be addressed in workshops under the G7 Alliance on Resource Efficiency could include:

  • Business initiatives and best practices (in cooperation with Business 7)
  • Policies to create favourable framework conditions
  • Life-cycle-based decision-making tools, data, concepts, and methodologies of resource efficiency
  • Industrial symbiosis , i.e., the sharing of services, utilities, and by-product resources among industries, e.g. through Eco-Industrial Towns
  • Support for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), including practical tools
  • Policy approaches and best practices in specific sectors
  • Sustainable products and purchasing, green public procurement, local supply chains and the integration of resource efficiency into decision-making in government agencies
  • Circular economies, eco-design, sharing economies and remanufacturing
  • Fostering research and innovation for resource efficiency and integrating resource efficiency into education and training
  • Relevant activities in international forums and international organisations
  • Experience from bilateral cooperation with developing countries and possible ways for the G7 to collaborate with and in support of these countries
  • The potential of substituting non-renewable resources with sustainable renewable resources.

The G7 Alliance on Resource Efficiency will conduct workshops at least once a year under the leadership of the respective Presidency. The use of virtual workshops and videoconferences is encouraged so as to maximize benefits while limiting travel requirements and resources.

Intensified International Cooperation

Work on resource efficiency can benefit from intensified cooperation with international organizations already active in this field. Therefore, we invite the International Resource Panel (IRP) of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to prepare a synthesis report highlighting the most promising potentials and solutions for resource efficiency in industrialized countries as well as in emerging market economies and developing countries. The synthesis report should build upon the existing work and main findings of the IRP and other relevant international organizations, such as the OECD and UNEP, and take into account relevant international processes such as the 10-Year Framework of Programmes on Sustainable Consumption and Production. The synthesis report should be provided by the second half of 2016. We further invite the OECD to develop policy guidance supplementing the synthesis report.

G-7 Action Plan to Combat Marine Litter

Overarching Principles

The G7 countries

  • Commit to the improvement of countries’ systems as a key goal of the action plan, to prevent, reduce and remove marine litter, including the below listed priority actions.
  • Recognize that support through international development assistance and investments are important to combat marine litter and encourage both.
  • Support development and implementation of national or regional action plans to reduce waste entering inland and coastal waters and ultimately becoming marine litter, as well as to remove existing waste.
  • Share best practices, especially with developing countries, and encourage a similar call to action in other international fora.
  • Recognize that, where available, the use of existing platforms and tools for cooperation will reduce duplication and take advantage of progress made (e.g. the Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-based Activities (GPA), the Global Partnership on Marine Litter (GPML) and the Regional Seas Conventions and Action Plans) and therefore support their use.
  • Promote individual and corporate behaviour change through public awareness and education to address marine litter.
  • Recognize that prevention is key to long-term success in addressing and combating marine litter and that industries and consumers have an important role to play in reducing waste.
  • Recognize that the need for removal actions is important, due to the vast amounts of litter already in the marine environment.
  • Support the use of a broad range of policy toolkits and available instruments, including economic incentives, market-based instruments, and public private partnerships to support implementation of actions to effectively combat marine litter.

Priority Actions to Address Land-Based Sources

  • Improving countries’ systems for waste management, reducing waste generation, and encouraging reuse and recycling;
  • Incorporating waste management activities into international development assistance and investments and supporting the implementation of pilot projects where appropriate;
  • Investigating sustainable and cost-effective solutions to reduce and prevent sewage and storm water related waste, including micro plastics entering the marine environment;
  • Promoting relevant instruments and incentives to reduce the use of disposable single-use and other items, which impact the marine environment;
  • Encouraging industry to develop sustainable packaging and remove ingredients from products to gain environmental benefits, such as by a voluntary phase-out of microbeads;
  • Promoting best practices along the whole plastics manufacturing, and value chain from production to transport, e.g. aiming for zero pellet loss;

Priority Removal Actions

  • Identifying accumulation areas of marine litter and establishing an exchange platform on experiences in marine litter removal on beaches, riverbanks, seafloor, the water column and sea surface areas, ports and inland waterways;
  • Supporting the removal of litter where it poses a threat to sensitive marine ecosystems, in an environmentally sound way, taking into account the socioeconomic aspects including cost effectiveness, thereby using best available techniques (BAT) and best Environmental practice (BEP) and engaging partners where possible;
  • Assessing and analyzing removal data to support and target outreach efforts, potential policy options, and other means of preventing litter;

Priority Actions to Address Sea-based Sources

  • Working to maximize the amount of waste delivered to port reception facilities and disposed of properly in accordance with Annex V of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL).
  • Identifying the options to address key waste items from the fishing industry and aquaculture which could contribute to marine litter, and implement pilot projects where appropriate (including deposit schemes, voluntary agreements and end-of-life recovery) and take into account the expertise of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) ;

Priority Action on Education, Research and Outreach

  • Promoting outreach and education activities leading to individual behavior change that can reduce the amount of litter entering the environment, internal waters and the seas;
  • Supporting the initiation of a harmonized global marine litter monitoring effort and the standardization of methods, data and evaluation;
  • Supporting the effort of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and other organizations to help understand the sources, pathways and impacts of marine litter; and
  • Supporting and calling for additional research initiatives to address marine litter.

Broader Food Security and Nutrition Development Approach

We remain strongly committed to the eradication of hunger and malnutrition. We therefore support the ongoing efforts towards an ambitious Post-2015 Development Agenda and envisage placing our engagement on food security and nutrition within the framework. As part of a broad effort involving our partner countries, and international actors, and as a significant contribution to the post 2015 development agenda, we aim to lift 500 million people in developing countries out of hunger and malnutrition by 2030.

As outlined below, the G7’s broad approach is designed to help reduce hunger and malnutrition. We will pursue a broad scope of interventions, including greater focus on increasing development effectiveness and improving impact, and mobilizing resources.

Our broad approach builds on our long-term G7 efforts for food security and nutrition, including the L’Aquila Food Security Initiative, the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition, the Land Partnerships and the Global Nutrition for Growth (N4G) Compact. We will build on our existing partnerships with developing countries, and we commit to supporting and aligning our activities with their development policies and strategies. We note with appreciation the commitments made by partner countries in the context of the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Movement and the Malabo Declaration on Accelerated Agricultural Growth and Transformation for Shared Prosperity and Improved Livelihoods.

Broad Scope of Interventions:

We will continue and build upon our existing wide range of interventions for food security and nutrition and will pay particular attention to the following areas:

Towards a dynamic transformation of the rural world

  • Hunger and malnutrition are currently most prevalent in rural areas. We aim to follow an integrated multi-sectoral approach to support rural areas in developing their potential, with a particular focus on the rural poor, smallholder and family farmers. However, more than half of the global population already live in urban areas. The rural world is already changing, through rapid demographic and spatial shifts. We will work together and share experience and ideas to deepen our understanding of how we can best support these ongoing processes to maximize the positives, minimize the negatives, and leave no one behind.
  • Recognizing the essential role of women and youth, we aim to make them central to this broad approach, particularly by empowering them within agriculture and food systems and by supporting their active participation in agricultural and food value chains. This will unlock their entrepreneurial potential to help increase family incomes, decrease poverty and improve food security and nutrition.
  • We will promote agricultural and food value chain approaches that link smallholder farmers with business, attract investment, and generate much-needed non-farm employment and income.

Responsible investment and sustainable agriculture

  • Our efforts should help mobilize private capital and increase its development benefit. We thus reaffirm our support for the consistent implementation of and strive to alignment of our own ODA-supported investments with the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (VGGT) and the CFS Principles for Responsible Investment in Agriculture and Food Systems. We furthermore strive to promote the conformance of private investments under the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition with these Guidelines and Principles.
  • The responsible governance of tenure of land is crucial for socially equitable agricultural development and for attracting investment. We will therefore continue our support of partner countries in their implementation of the VGGT, continue with the existing G7 Land Partnerships and seek to add new ones where appropriate.
  • We are concerned about the increasing pressure on natural resources and clearly recognize the need to conserve and sustainably use the world’s ecosystems. We agree to make sustainable intensification of agricultural production an important component of our food security efforts in support of partner countries. We agree to increase our efforts to ensure that research and development, new and sustainable technologies, and other innovations and practices are more accessible and available to the rural poor.
  • We are concerned about the negative effects of climate change and other underlying disaster-risk drivers on food security and nutrition, and we therefore commit to furthering means of sustainably increasing agricultural production and productivity and incomes while adapting and building resilience to climate change and mitigating greenhouse gases. We commit to promoting best practices for adaptation to climate change and take note of new initiatives, e.g. the Global Alliance for Climate Smart Agriculture.

Nutrition

  • We commit to following an integrated multi-sectoral approach to improving food security and nutrition, in an effort to achieve the internationally agreed World Health Assembly Global Targets to improve maternal, infant and young child nutrition. We welcome the N4G Compact, and recognize the need to scale up further nutrition-sensitive and nutrition-specific interventions.
  • We will pursue nutrition-specific interventions that have proven to be effective in addressing undernutrition and micronutrient deficiencies. We will also strengthen our nutrition-sensitive interventions in key sectors such as agriculture, social protection, water, sanitation and hygiene, health, education, and improving food systems. We support the diversified production of food to increase balanced diets for better nutrition.
  • We affirm a life-long approach with a focus on the nutrition of women of reproductive age, pregnant women, nursing mothers and children under five, with particular attention to the first 1000 days from pregnancy to a child’s second birthday.
  • We support the Rome Declaration on Nutrition and the Framework for Action adopted at the Second International Conference on Nutrition (ICN2), and welcome the continued efforts of the multi-stakeholder SUN Movement and its partner countries in fighting undernutrition. Regarding the N4G Compact, we look forward to reconvening in 2016 under Brazil’s leadership to monitor progress and assess the need for additional actions to reach the Compact’s goals.

Food security and nutrition in conflicts and crises

  • We remain committed to addressing the food security and nutrition needs of populations affected by natural disasters, economic crises and societal, political and violent conflicts.
  • We aim to better connect short-, medium- and long-term support, embedded within a comprehensive development strategy, in order to strengthen resilience. Enhancing transition between relief and development is key to increasing effectiveness and sustainability. Our objective is to strengthen the absorptive, adaptive and transformative capacities of individuals, communities and countries in order to enhance their ability to cope with acute shocks or chronic stresses.
  • Comprehensive joint risk analysis will form the basis for our interventions wherever possible, allowing us to better understand and address root causes of food insecurity.

We will strive for more of our interventions to be designed to enhance resilience, particularly in countries prone to recurrent or protracted food crises.

Increasing Development Effectiveness, Improving Impact

  • We reaffirm our commitment to fully implement the Busan principles to increase development effectiveness. We particularly recommit to supporting and aligning our activities with the existing strategies, approaches and plans of our partner countries, such as the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP). We also reiterate our commitment to support multi-stakeholder partnerships – both at the international level and within partner countries.
  • We support the CFS as the most inclusive platform for policy debates and coordination, and seek to engage with the CFS, other UN and international bodies and existing initiatives on improving concerted international efforts for food security and nutrition.
  • To ensure transparency, we will monitor and report on progress, as is consistent with G7 accountability practices. We will quantify our commitments in line with the outcomes of the Post-2015 Development Agenda process as appropriate, and monitor our progress through an accountability mechanism, building on previous G7 exercises. We will work to improve country level accountability processes.
  • We will improve the data input for monitoring our goal regarding food security and in particular nutrition by working closely with the UN bodies, the Global Nutrition Report and the SUN Movement.

Mobilizing Resources

  • We rely on our developing country partners to effectively use domestic resources for food security and nutrition. We call on the private sector to contribute with responsible investments, and we encourage the active involvement of civil society. We support the increased use of sustainable and innovative financing, in line with the Financing for Development process.
  • We recognize the fact that we, as the G7, have increased our ODA to agriculture, rural development, and food security and nutrition since our pledge in L’Aquila in 2009, and we acknowledge the role of ODA in leveraging other resources, including private investment. We today commit to working with our partners to mobilize the resources necessary to aim to lift 500 million people in developing countries out of hunger and malnutrition by 2030.
  • We recognize the important role of the FAO, the WHO, IFAD, the WFP and UNICEF, as well as financing through the Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), financial mechanisms, notably the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP), and civil society implementing partners. We recognize the commitments made as part of the N4G Compact and seek to unlock the matched funding available.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

G-7 Leaders' Declaration

Schloss Elmau, Germany

June 8, 2015

We, the leaders of the G7, met in Elmau for our annual Summit on 7 and 8 June 2015. Guided by our shared values and principles, we are determined to work closely together to meet the complex international economic and political challenges of our times. We are committed to the values of freedom and democracy, and their universality, to the rule of law and respect for human rights, and to fostering peace and security. Especially in view of the numerous crises in the world, we as G7 nations stand united in our commitment to uphold freedom, sovereignty and territorial integrity.

The G7 feels a special responsibility for shaping our planet’s future. 2015 is a milestone year for international cooperation and sustainable development issues. The UN Climate Conference in Paris COP 21 is crucial for the protection of the global climate, the UN summit in New York will set the universal global sustainable development agenda for the years to come and the Third International Conference on Financing for Development in Addis Ababa will support the implementation of the Post-2015 Development Agenda. We want to provide key impetus for ambitious results. “Think ahead. Act together.” – that is our guiding principle.

We have today agreed on concrete steps with regard to health, the empowerment of women and climate protection, to play our part in addressing the major global challenges and to respond to some of the most pressing issues in the world. Furthermore, in addition to fostering trade as a key engine for growth, putting these concrete steps into action, will help us to achieve our pivotal goal of strong, sustainable and balanced growth as well as job creation. We call on others to join us in pursuing this agenda.

Global Economy

State of the Global Economy

The global economic recovery has progressed since we last met. In some major advanced economies growth is strengthening and prospects have improved. The decline of energy prices has supportive effects in most of the G7 economies. However, many of our economies are still operating below their full potential and more work is needed to achieve our aim of strong, sustainable and balanced growth. Overall G7 unemployment is still too high, although it has decreased substantially in recent years. We also continue to see challenges such as prolonged low inflation rates, weak investment and demand, high public and private debt, sustained internal and external imbalances, geopolitical tensions as well as financial market volatility.

We commit to addressing these challenges and to continuing our efforts to achieve growth for all. Stronger and inclusive growth requires that we confront the vulnerabilities in our economies. To ensure that G7 countries operate at the technological frontier in the years ahead, we will foster growth by promoting education and innovation, protecting intellectual property rights, supporting private investment with a business friendly climate especially for small and medium-sized enterprises, ensuring an appropriate level of public investment, promoting quality infrastructure investment to address shortfalls through effective resource mobilization in partnership with the private sector and increasing productivity by further implementing ambitious structural reforms.

We agree to deliver on past reform commitments in these areas which will increase confidence and lift sustainable growth. We will continue to implement our fiscal strategies flexibly to take into account near-term economic conditions, so as to support growth and job creation, while putting debt as a share of GDP on a sustainable path. We concur that monetary policies should maintain price stability and support economic recovery within the mandate of central banks. We reaffirm our existing G7 exchange rate commitments.

A sound economic basis is a cornerstone for a better life for all people. Putting the world on a sustainable growth path in the long run will require in particular the protection of our climate, the promotion of health and the equal participation of all members of society. Therefore, the G7 commits to putting these issues at the centre of our growth agenda.

Women’s Entrepreneurship

Women’s entrepreneurship is a key driver of innovation, growth and jobs. However, across G7 countries and around the world far fewer women than men run their own businesses often due to additional barriers that women face in starting and growing businesses. We agree on common principles to boost women’s entrepreneurship, as set out in the annex, and invite other interested countries to join us in this effort. In particular, we will make girls and women aware of the possibility of becoming entrepreneurs. We will address the specific needs of women entrepreneurs, e.g. by promoting their access to finance, markets, skills, leadership opportunities and networks. We ask the OECD to monitor progress on promoting women’s entrepreneurship. We welcome the G7 Forum for Dialogue with Women to be hosted by the Presidency on 16 and 17 September 2015. We also reaffirm our commitment to continue our work to promote gender equality as well as full participation and empowerment for all women and girls. We welcome the “World Assembly for Women: WAW!” to be hosted by Japan, G7 Presidency in 2016.

Financial Market Regulation

A sound international financial system is key to putting growth on a sustainable path. Core reforms have been agreed to tackle the root causes of the global financial crisis, and important progress has been made on building a stronger and more resilient financial system, in particular by strengthening the soundness of the banking sector. However, the job is not yet finished, and following through on regulatory reform continues to be key. Going forward, we have identified the following priorities: full, consistent and prompt implementation of agreed reforms will be essential to ensuring an open and resilient global financial system. We will continue to address the “too-big-to-fail” problem on a global level to protect taxpayers from bearing losses generated by the failure of global systemically important financial institutions. In particular, we remain committed to finalizing the proposed common international standard on total loss absorbing capacity for global systemically important banks by November, following the completion of rigorous and comprehensive impact assessments.

We also remain committed to strengthening the regulation and oversight of the shadow banking sector, appropriate to the systemic risk posed. Timely and comprehensive implementation of the agreed G20 shadow banking roadmap is essential. In addition, we will monitor and address any newly evolving systemic risks from market-based finance, while we will work to ensure that it is able to fulfil its role in supporting the real economy. To help reduce systemic risk and increase transparency, we also stress the importance of enhanced cross-border cooperation in financial regulatory areas to enable regulations to be more effective, particularly in the areas of resolution and derivatives markets reform, where swift implementation is required. We encourage jurisdictions to defer to each other, when justified in line with the St Petersburg Declaration. Finally, we will also continue to monitor financial market volatility in order to address any emerging systemic risk that could arise.

Tax

We are committed to achieving a fair and modern international tax system which is essential to fairness and prosperity for all. We therefore reaffirm our commitment to finalize concrete and feasible recommendations for the G20/OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action Plan by the end of this year. Going forward, it will be crucial to ensure its effective implementation, and we encourage the G20 and the OECD to establish a targeted monitoring process to that end. We commit to strongly promoting automatic exchange of information on cross-border tax rulings. Moreover, we look forward to the rapid implementation of the new single global standard for automatic exchange of information by the end of 2017 or 2018, including by all financial centres subject to completing necessary legislative procedures. We also urge jurisdictions that have not yet, or not adequately, implemented the international standard for the exchange of information on request to do so expeditiously.

We recognize the importance of beneficial ownership transparency for combatting tax evasion, corruption and other activities generating illicit flows of finance and commit to providing updates on the implementation of our national action plans. We reiterate our commitment to work with developing countries on the international tax agenda and will continue to assist them in building their tax administration capacities.

Moreover, we will strive to improve existing international information networks and cross-border cooperation on tax matters, including through a commitment to establish binding mandatory arbitration in order to ensure that the risk of double taxation does not act as a barrier to cross-border trade and investment. We support work done on binding arbitration as part of the BEPS project and we encourage others to join us in this important endeavour.

Trade

Trade and investment are key drivers of growth, jobs and sustainable development. Fostering global economic growth by reducing barriers to trade remains imperative and we reaffirm our commitment to keep markets open and fight all forms of protectionism, including through standstill and rollback. To that end, we support a further extension of the G20 standstill commitment and call on others to do the same. At the same time, we remain committed to reducing barriers to trade and to improving competitiveness by taking unilateral steps to liberalize our economies. We will protect and promote investment and maintain a level playing field for all investors. International standards for public export finance are key to avoiding or reducing distortions in global trade, and we emphasize our support for the international working group on standards for public export finance.

We are committed to strengthening the rules-based multilateral trading system, including by contributing to full and swift implementation of the WTO Bali package. The focus in 2015 should in particular be on the entry into force of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA). To that end, G7 members commit to making every effort to complete their domestic ratification procedures in advance of the Tenth WTO Ministerial Conference (MC 10) in Nairobi this December. We also call for swift agreement by July of a WTO post-Bali work programme that secures a prompt conclusion and balanced outcome of the Doha Round and we fully support ongoing efforts in the WTO to this end.

Both the implementation of the TFA and agreement on a post-Bali work programme should lay the ground for a successful MC 10, the first WTO Ministerial to be held in Africa. We stand ready to continue our support to developing countries to help implement the measures agreed in the TFA. We must build on the success of the 2013 WTO Ministerial, which reinvigorated the negotiating pillar of the WTO, and demonstrated that flexibility is achievable within the consensus framework of the WTO. We look forward to the discussions at the G20 on ways to make the multilateral trading system work better, based on input from the WTO.

While strengthening the multilateral trading system remains a priority, we also welcome ongoing efforts to conclude ambitious and high-standard new bilateral and regional free trade agreements (FTAs) and look forward to swift progress in plurilateral negotiations, including the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA), the expansion of the Information Technology Agreement (ITA) and the Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA). We will work to conclude the expansion of the ITA without delay. These agreements are able to support the multilateral system, contribute to stronger global trade and to more growth and jobs and can act as building blocks for future multilateral agreements. To this end, FTAs need to be transparent, high-standard, and comprehensive as well as consistent with and supportive of the WTO framework.

We welcome progress on major ongoing trade negotiations, including on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and the EU-Japan FTA/Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), aimed at reaching ambitious, comprehensive and mutually beneficial agreements. We will make every effort to finalize negotiations on the TPP as soon as possible as well as to reach agreement in principle on the EU-Japan FTA/EPA preferably by the end of the year. We will immediately accelerate work on all TTIP issues, ensuring progress in all the elements of the negotiations, with the goal of finalizing understandings on the outline of an agreement as soon as possible, preferably by the end of this year. We welcome the conclusion of the negotiations on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the EU and look forward to its timely entry into force. We will work to ensure that our bilateral and regional FTAs support the global economy.

Responsible Supply Chains

Unsafe and poor working conditions lead to significant social and economic losses and are linked to environmental damage. Given our prominent share in the globalization process, G7 countries have an important role to play in promoting labour rights, decent working conditions and environmental protection in global supply chains. We will strive for better application of internationally recognized labour, social and environmental standards, principles and commitments (in particular UN, OECD, ILO and applicable environmental agreements) in global supply chains. We will engage with other countries, for example within the G20, to that end.

We strongly support the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and welcome the efforts to set up substantive National Action Plans. In line with the UN Guiding Principles, we urge private sector implementation of human rights due diligence. We will take action to promote better working conditions by increasing transparency, promoting identification and prevention of risks and strengthening complaint mechanisms. We recognize the joint responsibility of governments and business to foster sustainable supply chains and encourage best practices.

To enhance supply chain transparency and accountability, we encourage enterprises active or headquartered in our countries to implement due diligence procedures regarding their supply chains, e.g. voluntary due diligence plans or guides. We welcome international efforts, including private sector input, to promulgate industry-wide due diligence standards in the textile and ready-made garment sector. To promote safe and sustainable supply chains, we will increase our support to help SMEs develop a common understanding of due diligence and responsible supply chain management.

We welcome initiatives to promote the establishment of appropriate, impartial tools to help consumers and public procurers in our countries compare information on the validity and credibility of social and environmental product labels. One example is the use of relevant apps, which are already available in some countries. Moreover, we will strengthen multi-stakeholder initiatives in our countries and in partner countries, including in the textile and ready-made garment sector, building upon good practices learned from the Rana Plaza aftermath. We will continue supporting relevant global initiatives. Furthermore, we will better coordinate our bilateral development cooperation and support partner countries in taking advantage of responsible global supply chains to foster their sustainable economic development.

We support a “Vision Zero Fund” to be established in cooperation with the International Labour Organization (ILO). The Fund will also add value to existing ILO projects with its aim of preventing and reducing workplace-related deaths and serious injuries by strengthening public frameworks and establishing sustainable business practices. Access to the Fund will be conditional: the Fund will support those recipients that commit themselves to prevention measures and the implementation of labour, social, environmental and safety standards. We agree to follow up on the matter and look forward to the Fund reaching out to the G20.

We also commit to strengthening mechanisms for providing access to remedies including the National Contact Points (NCPs) for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. In order to do so, the G7 will encourage the OECD to promote peer reviews and peer learning on the functioning and performance of NCPs. We will ensure that our own NCPs are effective and lead by example.

We welcome the closing of the funding gap in the Rana Plaza Donor Trust Fund for compensating the victims of the tragic accident in 2013.

Foreign Policy

Acting on Common Values and Principles

We, the G7, emphasise the importance of freedom, peace and territorial integrity, as well as respect for international law and respect for human rights. We strongly support all efforts to uphold the sovereign equality of all States as well as respect for their territorial integrity and political independence. We are concerned by current conflicts which indicate an erosion of respect for international law and of global security.

Based on our common values and principles we are committed to:

Finding a Solution to the Conflict in Ukraine

We reiterate our condemnation of the illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula by the Russian Federation and reaffirm our policy of its non-recognition.

We reiterate our full support for the efforts to find a diplomatic solution to the conflict in eastern Ukraine, particularly in the framework of the Normandy format and the Trilateral Contact Group. We welcome the OSCE’s key role in finding a peaceful solution. We call on all sides to fully implement the Minsk agreements including the Package of Measures for their implementation signed on 12 February 2015 in Minsk, through the established Trilateral Contact Group and the four working groups. We are concerned by the recent increase in fighting along the line of contact; we renew our call to all sides to fully respect and implement the ceasefire and withdraw heavy weapons. We recall that the duration of sanctions should be clearly linked to Russia’s complete implementation of the Minsk agreements and respect for Ukraine’s sovereignty. They can be rolled back when Russia meets these commitments. However, we also stand ready to take further restrictive measures in order to increase cost on Russia should its actions so require. We expect Russia to stop trans-border support of separatist forces and to use its considerable influence over the separatists to meet their Minsk commitments in full.

We commend and support the steps the Ukrainian government is taking to implement comprehensive structural reforms and urge the Ukrainian leadership to decisively continue the necessary fundamental transformation in line with IMF and EU commitments. We reaffirm our commitment to working together with the international financial institutions and other partners to provide financial and technical support as Ukraine moves forward with its transformation. We ask the G7 Ambassadors in Kiev to establish a Ukraine support group. Its task will be to advance Ukraine´s economic reform process through coordinated advice and assistance.

Achieving High Levels of Nuclear Safety

Achieving and maintaining high levels of nuclear safety worldwide remains a major priority to us. We welcome the report of the G7 Nuclear Safety and Security Group. We remain committed to bringing the Chernobyl Shelter Project to a successful completion in order to make the Chernobyl site stable and environmentally safe.

Maintaining a Rules-Based Maritime Order and Achieving Maritime Security

We are committed to maintaining a rules-based order in the maritime domain based on the principles of international law, in particular as reflected in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. We are concerned by tensions in the East and South China Seas. We underline the importance of peaceful dispute settlement as well as free and unimpeded lawful use of the world’s oceans. We strongly oppose the use of intimidation, coercion or force, as well as any unilateral actions that seek to change the status quo, such as large scale land reclamation. We endorse the Declaration on Maritime Security issued by G7 Foreign Ministers in Lübeck.

Strengthening the System of Multilateral Treaties / Arms Trade Treaty

We emphasise the importance of strengthening the system of multilateral treaties and commitments and in this regard stress the importance of the Arms Trade Treaty, which entered into force on 24 December 2014.

Preventing and Combating Proliferation

We remain committed to the universalisation of all relevant treaties and conventions that contribute to preventing and combating the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, in particular the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), the Chemical Weapons Convention and the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention. We strongly regret that, although agreement was reached on a number of substantive issues, it was not possible to reach consensus on a final document at the Ninth NPT Review Conference. The G7 renew their commitment to the full implementation of the 2010 Action Plan across the three pillars of the Treaty. The NPT remains the cornerstone of the nuclear non-proliferation regime and the essential foundation for the pursuit of nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, as well as for the peaceful use of nuclear energy.

Iran

We welcome the political understanding on key parameters of a Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action reached by the E3+3, facilitated by the EU, and Iran on 2 April. We support the continuous efforts by the E3/EU+3 and Iran to achieve a comprehensive solution by 30 June that ensures the exclusively peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear programme and ensures that Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon. We call on Iran to cooperate fully with the International Atomic Energy Agency on verification of Iran's nuclear activities and to address all outstanding issues, including those relating to possible military dimensions. We urge Iran to respect the human rights of its citizens and to to contribute constructively to regional stability.

North Korea

We strongly condemn North Korea’s continued development of nuclear and ballistic missile programmes, as well as its appalling human rights violations, and its abductions of nationals from other countries.

Supporting Diplomatic Solutions

We are deeply concerned by the dramatic political, security and humanitarian situation in fragile countries and regions and the dangers originating from these conflicts for neighbouring countries and beyond. We condemn in the strongest terms all forms of sexual violence in conflict, and are committed to enhancing the role of women in international peace and security. Sustainable solutions need to be inclusive in order to reestablish effective governance and achieve sustainable peace and stability.

We support the ongoing UN-led processes to find lasting solutions for peace and stability in Syria, Libya and Yemen. A genuine UN led transition based on the full implementation of the Geneva Communiqué is the only way to bring peace and defeat terrorism in Syria.

Libya

In Libya, we are deeply concerned about the growing terrorist threat, arms proliferation, migrant smuggling, humanitarian suffering and the depletion of state assets. Unless a political agreement is reached, the ongoing instability risks prolonging the crisis that is felt most keenly and acutely by the Libyan people themselves. They are already suffering as terrorist groups attempt to expand into ungoverned space and criminal networks exploit the situation by facilitating irregular migration through Libya.

The time for fighting has passed, the moment for bold political decisions has come. We call on Libyans from all sides to seize this opportunity, to put down their weapons and work together to transform the aspirations that gave birth to the revolution into the political foundations of a democratic state. The time for political agreement is now and we commend those Libyans who have supported the dialogue process and displayed leadership by pursuing peace in their own communities.

We welcome the progress made by all the parties to the negotiations led by UNSRSG Bernardino León. Libyan leaders must now grasp the opportunity to conclude these negotiations and to form a Government of National Accord (GNA) accountable to the Libyan people. They, and those who have influence over them, must show the necessary strength and leadership at this critical moment to reach and implement agreement.

Once an agreement is reached, we stand ready to provide significant support to such an inclusive and representative government as it tries to build effective state institutions, including security forces, to restore public services, to expand infrastructure, strengthen, rebuild and diversify the economy and to rid the country of terrorists and criminal networks.

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

On the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, we call upon the parties, with the active support of the International Community, including the Quartet, to work towards a negotiated solution based on two States living in peace and security.

Fighting Trafficking of Migrants/Tackling Causes for Refugee Crises

We are extremely preoccupied about the increasing and unprecedented global flow of refugees, internally displaced persons, and migrants caused by a multitude of conflicts and humanitarian crises, dire economic and ecological situations and repressive regimes. Recent tragedies in the Mediterranean and the Bay of Bengal/Andaman Sea illustrate the urgent need to address effectively this phenomenon, and in particular the crime of trafficking of migrants. We reaffirm our commitment to prevent and combat the trafficking of migrants, and to detect, deter and disrupt human trafficking in and beyond our borders. We call upon all nations to tackle the causes of these crises that have such tragic consequences for so many people and to address the unique development needs of middle-income countries hosting refugees and migrants.

Fighting Terrorism and its Financing

The scourge of terrorism has affected countless innocent victims. It denies tolerance, the enjoyment of universal human rights and fundamental freedoms, including religious freedom, destroys cultural heritage and uproots millions of people from their homes. In light of the Foreign Terrorist Fighters phenomenon, the fight against terrorism and violent extremism will have to remain the priority for the whole international community. In this context we welcome the continued efforts of the Global Coalition to counter ISIL/Da’esh. We reaffirm our commitment to defeating this terrorist group and combatting the spread of its hateful ideology. We stand united with all countries and regions afflicted by the brutal terrorist acts, including Iraq, Tunisia and Nigeria whose leaders participated in our discussions at Schloss Elmau. It is a task for all nations and societies to confront the conditions conducive to the spread of terrorism and violent extremism, including the spread of hatred and intolerance, also through the internet, by promoting good governance and respect for human rights. We stress the importance of implementing the necessary measures to detect and prevent acts of terrorism, to prosecute those responsible, and rehabilitate and reintegrate offenders, in accordance with international law, and to prevent the financing of terrorism.

The fight against terrorism and terrorist financing is a major priority for the G7. We will continue to act fast and decisively, and will strengthen our coordinated action. In particular we reaffirm our commitment to effectively implement the established international framework for the freezing of terrorists’ assets, and will facilitate cross-border freezing requests among G7 countries. We will take further actions to ensure greater transparency of all financial flows, including through an appropriate regulation of virtual currencies and other new payment methods. We reaffirm the importance of the ongoing work undertaken by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and commit to contributing actively to this work. We will strive to ensure an effective implementation of FATF standards, including through a robust follow-up process.

Likewise, we are committed to combating wildlife trafficking, which is pushing some of the world’s species to the brink of extinction and in some instances is being used to finance organized crime, insurgencies, and terrorism.

Supporting African Partners

We welcome the strengthening of democratic institutions and the growing economic opportunities across Africa, and note this progress under challenging circumstances across the continent, including progress in establishing stability in Somalia and a largely peaceful democratic transition in Nigeria. We reiterate our continued commitment to support African partners in addressing challenges to security, governance and stability, including in Mali, Sudan, South Sudan, the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia, Nigeria and most recently Burundi.

Supporting Afghanistan

We are committed to an enduring partnership with Afghanistan in support of its stability, prosperity and democratic future. - 10 -

Supporting the Reconstruction in Nepal

We are deeply saddened by the loss of life and destruction caused by the devastating earthquakes in Nepal and are offering the people and the government of Nepal our ongoing support. We will continue to provide emergency assistance as needed and are ready to consider requests for bi- and multilateral financial and technical support as well as reconstruction assistance in alignment with the priorities of the Nepalese government. We strive to contribute to the restoration of lost and damaged cultural treasures.

Health

The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being. We are therefore strongly committed to continuing our engagement in this field with a specific focus on strengthening health systems through bilateral programmes and multilateral structures.

Ebola

We commit to preventing future outbreaks from becoming epidemics by assisting countries to implement the World Health Organization’s International Health Regulations (IHR), including through Global Health Security Agenda and its common targets and other multilateral initiatives. In order to achieve this we will offer to assist at least 60 countries, including the countries of West Africa, over the next five years, building on countries’ expertise and existing partnerships. We encourage other development partners and countries to join this collective effort. In this framework, we will also be mindful of the healthcare needs of migrants and refugees.

The Ebola crisis has shown that the world needs to improve its capacity to prevent, protect against, detect, report and respond to public health emergencies. We are strongly committed to getting the Ebola cases down to zero. We also recognize the importance of supporting recovery for those countries most affected by the outbreak. We must draw lessons from this crisis. We acknowledge the work that is being done by the WHO and welcome the outcome agreed at the Special Session of the Executive Board on Ebola and the 68th World Health Assembly. We support the ongoing process to reform and strengthen the WHO’s capacity to prepare for and respond to complex health crises while reaffirming the central role of the WHO for international health security.

We welcome the initiative proposed by Germany, Ghana and Norway to the UN Secretary-General to draw up a comprehensive proposal for effective crisis management in the area of health and look forward to the report to be produced by the end of the year by the high-level panel established by the UN Secretary General. The Ebola outbreak has shown that the timely mobilization and disbursement of appropriate response capacities, both funding and human resources, is crucial. We welcome the ongoing development of mechanisms including by the WHO, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund and call on all partners to strongly coordinate their work. We support the initiative taken by the World Bank to develop a Pandemic Emergency Facility. We encourage the G20 to advance this agenda. Simultaneously, we will coordinate to fight future epidemics and will set up or strengthen mechanisms for rapid deployment of multidisciplinary teams of experts coordinated through a common platform. We will implement those mechanisms in close cooperation with the WHO and national authorities of affected countries.

Antimicrobial Resistances

Antimicrobials play a crucial role for the current and future success of human and veterinary medicine. We fully support the recently adopted WHO Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. We will develop or review and effectively implement our national action plans and support other countries as they develop their own national action plans.

We are strongly committed to the One Health approach, encompassing all areas – human, and animal health as well as agriculture and the environment. We will foster the prudent use of antibiotics and will engage in stimulating basic research, research on epidemiology, infection prevention and control, and the development of new antibiotics, alternative therapies, vaccines and rapid point-of-care diagnostics. We commit to taking into account the annex (Joint Efforts to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance) as we develop or review and share our national action plans.

Neglected Tropical Diseases

We commit ourselves to the fight against neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). We are convinced that research plays a vital role in the development and implementation of new means of tackling NTDs. We will work collaboratively with key partners, including the WHO Global Observatory on Health Research and Development. In this regard we will contribute to coordinating research and development (R&D) efforts and make our data available. We will build on efforts to map current R&D activities, which will help facilitate improved coordination in R&D and contribute to better addressing the issue of NTDs. We commit to supporting NTD-related research, focusing notably on areas of most urgent need. We acknowledge the role of the G7-Academies of Science in identifying such areas. In particular, we will stimulate both basic research on prevention, control and treatment and research focused on faster and targeted development of easily usable and affordable drugs, vaccines and point-of-care technologies.

As part of our health system strengthening efforts we will continue to advocate accessible, affordable, quality and essential health services for all. We support community based response mechanisms to distribute therapies and otherwise prevent, control and ultimately eliminate these diseases. We will invest in the prevention and control of NTDs in order to achieve 2020 elimination goals.

We are committed to ending preventable child deaths and improving maternal health worldwide, supporting the renewal of the Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health and welcoming the establishment of the Global Financing Facility in support of “Every Woman, Every Child” and therefore welcome the success of the replenishment conference in Berlin for Gavi, the Global Vaccine Alliance, which has mobilized more than USD 7.5 billion to vaccinate an additional 300 million children by 2020. We fully support the ongoing work of the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and look forward to its successful replenishment in 2016 with the support of an enlarged group of donors.

Climate Change, Energy, and Environment

Climate Change

Urgent and concrete action is needed to address climate change, as set out in the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report. We affirm our strong determination to adopt at the Climate Change Conference in December in Paris this year (COP21) a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) applicable to all parties that is ambitious, robust, inclusive and reflects evolving national circumstances.

The agreement should enhance transparency and accountability including through binding rules at its core to track progress towards achieving targets, which should promote increased ambition over time. This should enable all countries to follow a low-carbon and resilient development pathway in line with the global goal to hold the increase in global average temperature below 2 °C.

Mindful of this goal and considering the latest IPCC results, we emphasize that deep cuts in global greenhouse gas emissions are required with a decarbonisation of the global economy over the course of this century. Accordingly, as a common vision for a global goal of greenhouse gas emissions reductions we support sharing with all parties to the UNFCCC the upper end of the latest IPCC recommendation of 40 to 70 % reductions by 2050 compared to 2010 recognizing that this challenge can only be met by a global response. We commit to doing our part to achieve a low-carbon global economy in the long-term including developing and deploying innovative technologies striving for a transformation of the energy sectors by 2050 and invite all countries to join us in this endeavor. To this end we also commit to develop long term national low-carbon strategies.

The G7 welcomes the announcement or proposal of post-2020 emission targets by all its members, as well as the submission of intended nationally determined contributions (INDC) and calls upon all countries to do so well in advance of COP21. We reaffirm our strong commitment to the Copenhagen Accord to mobilizing jointly USD 100 billion a year by 2020 from a wide variety of sources, both public and private in the context of meaningful mitigation actions and transparency on implementation.

Climate finance is already flowing at higher levels. We will continue our efforts to provide and mobilize increased finance, from public and private sources, and to demonstrate that we and others are well on our way to meet the USD 100 bn goal and that we stand ready to engage proactively in the negotiations of the finance provisions of the Paris outcome. We recognize the potential of multilateral development banks (MDBs) in delivering climate finance and helping countries transition to low carbon economies. We call on MDBs to use to the fullest extent possible their balance sheets and their capacity to mobilize other partners in support of country-led programs to meet this goal. We thank the presidency for the publication of the Background Report on Long-Term Climate Finance and call for a further exchange in all relevant fora in view of COP 21.

Mobilization of private sector capital is also crucial for achieving this commitment and unlocking the required investments in low-carbon technologies as well as in building resilience against the effects of climate change. To overcome existing investment barriers finance models with high mobilization effects are needed.

To this end, we will:

a) Intensify our support particularly for vulnerable countries’ own efforts to manage climate change related disaster risk and to build resilience. We will aim to increase by up to 400 million the number of people in the most vulnerable developing countries who have access to direct or indirect insurance coverage against the negative impact of climate change related hazards by 2020 and support the development of early warning systems in the most vulnerable countries. To do so we will learn from and build on already existing risk insurance facilities such as the African Risk Capacity, the Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility and other efforts to develop insurance solutions and markets in vulnerable regions, including in small islands developing states, Africa, Asia and Pacific, Latin America and the Caribbean as set out in the annex.

b) Accelerate access to renewable energy in Africa and developing countries in other regions with a view to reducing energy poverty and mobilizing substantial financial resources from private investors, development finance institutions and multilateral development banks by 2020 building on existing work and initiatives, including by the Global Innovation Lab for Climate Finance as set out in the annex.

We also reaffirm our ambition to make the Green Climate Fund fully operational in 2015 and a key institution of the future climate finance architecture.

We remain committed to the elimination of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies and encourage all countries to follow and we remain committed to continued progress in the OECD discussions on how export credits can contribute to our common goal to address climate change.

We pledge to incorporate climate mitigation and resilience considerations into our development assistance and investment decisions. We will continue our efforts to phase down hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and call on all Parties to the Montreal Protocol to negotiate an amendment this year to phase down HFCs and on donors to assist developing countries in its implementation.

In order to incentivize investments towards low-carbon growth opportunities we commit to the long-term objective of applying effective policies and actions throughout the global economy, including carbon market-based and regulatory instruments and call on other countries to join us. We are committed to establishing a platform for a strategic dialogue on these issues based on voluntary participation and in cooperation with relevant partners, including the World Bank.

Energy

We reaffirm our commitment to the energy security principles and specific actions decided in Brussels in 2014, welcome the progress achieved since then under the Rome G7 Energy Initiative and will continue their implementation. Moreover, we welcome the G7 Hamburg Initiative for Sustainable Energy Security, in particular the additional concrete joint actions to further strengthen sustainable energy security in the G7 countries and beyond.

Notably, we reaffirm our support for Ukraine and other vulnerable countries in their ongoing efforts to reform and liberalize their energy systems and reiterate that energy should not be used as a means of political coercion or as a threat to security. We welcome the intention of the Ukrainian government to reduce energy-related subsidies and invest in energy efficiency programmes.

In addition, we intend to continue our work on assessments of energy system vulnerabilities. Moreover, we will work on strengthening the resilience and flexibility of gas markets, covering both pipeline gas and liquefied natural gas. We regard diversification as a core element of energy security and aim to further diversify the energy mix, energy fuels, sources and routes. We will strengthen cooperation in the field of energy efficiency and launch a new cooperative effort on enhancing cybersecurity of the energy sector. And we will work together and with other interested countries to raise the overall coordination and transparency of clean energy research, development and demonstration, highlighting the importance of renewable energy and other low-carbon technologies. We ask our Energy Ministers to take forward these initiatives and report back to us in 2016.

Resource Efficiency

The protection and efficient use of natural resources is vital for sustainable development. We strive to improve resource efficiency, which we consider crucial for the competitiveness of industries, for economic growth and employment, and for the protection of the environment, climate and planet. Building on the “Kobe 3R Action Plan”, and on other existing initiatives, we will continue to take ambitious action to improve resource efficiency as part of broader strategies to promote sustainable materials management and material-cycle societies. We are establishing the G7-Alliance on Resource Efficiency as a forum to share knowledge and create information networks on a voluntary basis. As set out in the annex, the Alliance will collaborate with businesses, SMEs, and other relevant stakeholders to advance opportunities offered by resource efficiency, promote best practices, and foster innovation. We acknowledge the benefits of collaborating with developing countries on resource-efficiency, including through innovative public private partnerships. We ask the UNEP International Resource Panel to prepare a synthesis report highlighting the most promising potentials and solutions for resource efficiency. We further invite the OECD to develop policy guidance supplementing the synthesis report.

Protection of the Marine Environment

We acknowledge that marine litter, in particular plastic litter, poses a global challenge, directly affecting marine and coastal life and ecosystems and potentially also human health. Accordingly, increased effectiveness and intensity of work is required to combat marine litter striving to initiate a global movement. The G7 commits to priority actions and solutions to combat marine litter as set out in the annex, stressing the need to address land- and sea-based sources, removal actions, as well as education, research and outreach.

We, the G7, take note of the growing interest in deep sea mining beyond the limits of national jurisdiction and the opportunities it presents. We call on the International Seabed Authority to continue, with early involvement of all relevant stakeholders, its work on a clear, effective and transparent code for sustainable deep sea mining, taking into account the interests of developing states. Key priorities include setting up regulatory certainty and predictability for investors and enhancing the effective protection of the marine environment from harmful effects that may arise from deep sea mining. We are committed to taking a precautionary approach in deep sea mining activities, and to conducting environmental impact assessments and scientific research.

Development

Post-2015 Agenda for Sustainable Development

2015 is a milestone year for international sustainable development issues. The Third International Conference on Financing for Development in Addis Ababa, the UN Summit for the adoption of the Post-2015 agenda in New York and the Climate Change Conference in Paris will set the global sustainable development and climate agenda for the coming years.

We are committed to achieving an ambitious, people-centred, planet-sensitive and universally applicable Post-2015 Agenda for Sustainable Development that integrates the three dimensions of sustainable development – environmental, economic and social – in a balanced manner.

The agenda should complete the unfinished business of the Millennium Development Goals, end extreme poverty, leave no-one behind, reduce inequality, accelerate the global transition to sustainable economies, promote sustainable management of natural resources, and strengthen peace, good governance and human rights. In order to mobilize appropriate action in and by all countries and by all stakeholders, we support the formulation and communication of key policy messages. We are committed to building a new global partnership based on universality, shared responsibility, mutual accountability, efficient and effective monitoring and review and a multi-stakeholder approach to our common goals of ending extreme poverty by 2030 and transitioning to sustainable development.

To help foster this new transformative agenda, we have committed to significant measures on global health, food security, climate and marine protection, sustainable supply chains and women’s economic empowerment.

Collectively, we commit to supporting furthering financial and non-financial means of implementation, including through domestic resource mobilization, innovative financing, private finance, official development and other assistance and an ambitious policy framework.

We reaffirm the essential role that official development assistance (ODA) and other international public finance play as a catalyst for, and complement to, other sources of financing for development. We reaffirm our respective ODA commitments, such as the 0.7% ODA/GNI target as well as our commitment to reverse the declining trend of ODA to the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and to better target ODA towards countries where the needs are greatest. We also commit to encouraging private capital flows.

Food Security

Good governance, economic growth and better functioning markets, and investment in research and technology, together with increased domestic and private sector investment and development assistance have collectively contributed to increases in food security and improved nutrition.

As part of a broad effort involving our partner countries, and international actors, and as a significant contribution to the Post 2015 Development Agenda, we aim to lift 500 million people in developing countries out of hunger and malnutrition by 2030. The G7 Broad Food Security and Nutrition Development Approach, as set out in the annex, will make substantial contributions to these goals. We will strengthen efforts to support dynamic rural transformations, promote responsible investment and sustainable agriculture and foster multisectoral approaches to nutrition, and we aim to safeguard food security and nutrition in conflicts and crisis. We will continue to align with partner countries strategies, improve development effectiveness and strengthen the transparent monitoring of our progress. We will ensure our actions continue to empower women, smallholders and family farmers as well as advancing and supporting sustainable agriculture and food value chains. We welcome the 2015 Expo in Milan (“Feeding the Planet - Energy for Life”) and its impact on sustainable agriculture and the eradication of global hunger and malnutrition.

Women’s Economic Empowerment

Women’s economic participation reduces poverty and inequality, promotes growth and benefits all. Yet women regularly face discrimination which impedes economic potential, jeopardizes investment in development, and constitutes a violation of their human rights. We will support our partners in developing countries and within our own countries to overcome discrimination, sexual harassment, violence against women and girls and other cultural, social, economic and legal barriers to women’s economic participation.

We recognise that being equipped with relevant skills for decent work, especially through technical and vocational education and training (TVET) via formal and non-formal learning, is key to the economic empowerment of women and girls, including those who face multiple sources of discrimination (e.g. women and girls with disabilities), and to improving their employment and entrepreneurship opportunities. We commit to increasing the number of women and girls technically and vocationally educated and trained in developing countries through G7 measures by one third (compared to “business as usual”) by 2030. We will also work to increase career training and education for women and girls within G7 countries.

We will continue to take steps to foster access to quality jobs for women and to reduce the gender gap in workforce participation within our own countries by 25% by 2025, taking into account national circumstances including by improving the framework conditions to enable women and men to balance family life and employment, including access to parental leave and childcare. The private sector also has a vital role in creating an environment in which women can more meaningfully participate in the economy. We therefore support the UN Women’s Empowerment Principles and call on companies worldwide to integrate them into their activities. We will coordinate our efforts through a new G7 working group on women.

CONNEX

We reaffirm our commitment to the initiative on Strengthening Assistance for Complex Contract Negotiations (CONNEX), aimed at providing multi-disciplinary expertise in developing countries for negotiating complex investment agreements, focusing initially on the extractives sector. We emphasize the three pillars of: information integration and accessibility; independence and quality of advice; and capacity building among stakeholders. We endorse the Code of Conduct for multi-disciplinary advisory services and encourage support providers and other relevant stakeholders to incorporate the Code as a set of binding principles into their contracts worldwide. We encourage pilot projects to be undertaken under the banner of the CONNEX initiative in collaboration with support providers, such as the African Legal Support Facility. We welcome further coordination on mechanisms for knowledge sharing and peer learning on the subject of negotiation support.

Deauville Partnership

We reconfirm our strong commitment to the people of the Middle East and Northern Africa (MENA). Given the current challenges in the region, we renew our commitment to the Deauville Partnership with Arab countries in transition. We support their efforts to improve governance and the rule of law and welcome the recent agreement on the Deauville Compact on Economic Governance and the Action Plan for Financial Inclusion. We further support their efforts to strengthen democracy and human rights and implement economic and social reform to achieve inclusive growth especially for women and youth, including by fostering responsible financial inclusion and facilitating the flow of remittances. The G7 remains committed to working with governments and global financial centres to follow up on asset recovery efforts. We are convinced that, along with the Deauville partner countries, we can contribute to economic, social and political progress in the Arab countries in transition. The Transition Fund remains an important instrument for supporting country-led reform. We endorse measures to further enhance the Fund´s effectiveness, future viability, and impact. We are committed to delivering on pledges made to date and welcome additional contributions to ensure the capitalization goal is met.

G7 Accountability

We remain committed to holding ourselves accountable for the promises we have made in an open and transparent way. We welcome the Elmau Progress Report 2015 which demonstrates the progress we have made so far on our biodiversity commitment and shows how this progress contributes to other G7 development commitments. The report also stresses the need for continued action in this regard. We look forward to the next comprehensive progress report in 2016.

Conclusion

We look forward to meeting under the Presidency of Japan in 2016.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Briefing by Press Secretary Josh Earnest on G-7 Summit

Filing Center
Interalpen Hotel
Telfs-Buchen/Seefeld, Austria

11:40 A.M. CEST

MR. EARNEST:  Good afternoon, everybody.  Welcome to the G7. It's nice to see you all.  I don't have any announcements at the top.  But I'm told that we have the pool who has dialed in from the summit site on the phone, so what I thought I might do is take two or three questions from the pool, and then we'll go to questions in the room. 

I don't know if anybody from the pool can hear me, but if so, why don't you ask your first question.

Q    Hey, Josh, it's Julie Pace over here with the pool.  A couple of us do have questions.  If I could just start.  Can you give us any kind of readout of the trade meeting?  What was the President asked by the leaders about the status of the TPA?  What did he tell them on that?  And what have the lawmakers that he brought over with him been doing?  Have they been talking to the leaders about trade at all?

MR. EARNEST:  It sounds like you're asking for a readout of the first plenary session.  I don't have a specific readout of the plenary session.  I know that they have a series of topics that are scheduled over the course of the weekend, and so I would anticipate that in the news conference that the President does tomorrow that he'll have a more detailed readout of the individual plenary session meetings.

I can give a more detailed readout of the bilateral meeting that the President did with Chancellor Merkel, and maybe we'll get to that a little bit later in the briefing.

In terms of the members of Congress who joined the President for the trip, I believe there are four members of Congress who have traveled here to attend the G7 along with the rest of the presidential delegation.  These members are principally here for a couple of reasons.  One is they obviously have an interest in some of the issues that will be discussed at the G7, including the issue of trade.  This will be a topic at one of the plenary sessions that the President does with other world leaders, to talk about opening up access to overseas markets for American goods and services.

Some of the members of Congress who joined the trip are members of Congress who have been engaged in the debate that's on Capitol Hill back in the States right now about this particular issue, so this is one of the reasons that they’re on the trip. 

As you know, over the last year or so, we have redoubled our efforts to try to engage members of Congress in new and creative ways, and on recent foreign trips, the President has invited members of Congress to attend -- or to join him for those trips.  Obviously there are several members of Congress that joined him on the recent trip to India earlier this year, and this is just a continuation of that ongoing effort.

Do we have another question from the pool?  I feel a little like I'm hosting a call-in show.  (Laughter.)  Jeff from Germany, go ahead.  (Laughter.) 

Q    Jeff from Germany.  (Laughter.)  Two questions.  First, can you give us any details about what the President had told the European leaders about Greece, and any update about that discussion and that situation?  And secondly, could you do the same on climate change?  Has there been any progress on what the G7 leaders were trying to accomplish on that today?

MR. EARNEST:  Jeff, I can say that both of those issues were discussed when the President had the opportunity to sit down for a more formal discussion with Chancellor Merkel.  They convened that bilateral meeting shortly after their social visit to Krün this morning. 

As it relates to Greece, I will say that there was unanimity of opinion in the room that it was important for Greece and their partners to chart a way forward that builds on crucial structural reforms and returns Greece to sustainable, long-term growth.  We're pleased that we have seen similar indications from the Greek government.  And there obviously is a deadline that's looming, and the President is certainly hopeful that Greece and their partners will be able to chart this path without causing undue volatility in the global financial markets. 

That, after all, is the United States interest that's at stake here.  The U.S. economy would be negatively influenced by that kind of volatility, and the President is hopeful that that can be avoided if all sides engage in these productive conversations and reach a resolution that is in the interest of all parties. 

Q    Can you clarify, Josh, was that -- excuse me for interrupting you -- was that just in the bilat with Merkel, or was Greece discussed at the table with all of the G7 leaders?

MR. EARNEST:  This was in the context of the bilateral meeting that the President had with Chancellor Merkel. 

As it relates to climate, there was a discussion about climate in the bilateral meeting.  It was acknowledged that all of the G7 countries who are participating have publicized the commitments that they are prepared to make at the Paris climate negotiations that are scheduled for the end of this year.  I think that is a pretty good indication of the leading role that G7 countries are taking in this effort.  This is, after all, a global effort and will require a significant commitment from countries around the world.  And it makes sense that some of the largest economies in the world would make serious commitments, and do so well in advance of the talks to set an appropriate tone for what could be achieved in those conversations.

I will say that the President and Chancellor Merkel had an opportunity to discuss that briefly in their bilateral meeting.  But I wouldn't describe those consultations as particularly substantive, other than both referencing how this is an important priority and how both were pleased that all of the G7 countries had made important commitments already.

Q    Just one follow-up the Greece one before -- Justin I know wants to ask a question.  But are you able to say whether the topic has also been discussed at the wider meetings, Josh, or just at the bilateral?

MR. EARNEST:  I know it was discussed at the bilateral.  I'm not in a position to talk about the first plenary session that already occurred.  I'd already left by the time before those plenary discussions had started, so I don't have a detailed readout of those plenary discussions.  But that's something we should be able to get into tomorrow.

Q    Hey, Josh, it's Justin.  Long time listener, first-time caller.  (Laughter.)  Maybe you could just touch on two things pretty quickly -- the first was, going into the bilat with Prime Minister Cameron, does President Obama plan to raise the issue of Britain’s defense spending?  We know this has been kind of an issue that's been ongoing, so I'm wondering, now that we're past the campaign, if this is something that the President plans to bring on.  And then I also noticed the sanctions language in your statement about the meeting with Merkel.  I'm wondering if you guys saw President Tusk’s comments today about trying to get sanctions renewed before even the deadline before the end of the month -- whether you guys see that as attainable, if you’ve gotten assurances from the EU that this is something that's going to happen.  Thanks.

MR. EARNEST:  Justin, in terms of your second question, I would say that a little over half of the meeting with the President had with Chancellor Merkel was dedicated to the issue of Ukraine and the need for the G7, but also our European partners, to continue to show unity in confronting Russia over the destabilizing actions in Ukraine.

Obviously, Chancellor Merkel has played an important and leading role in preserving this unity.  And the goal is to ensure that it continues on a range of issues, including on sanctions, which impose significant economic costs on the Russian economy, again, as a result of Russia’s destabilizing actions in Ukraine.

And so there was an opportunity for the two leaders to consult on this issue.  And the President certainly does believe that it would be an important show of that continued unity for Europe to send a signal about their intention to continue sanctions.  And this is something that I am confident will be discussed not just with Chancellor Merkel, but will be discussed with the broader G7 leaders over the course of the summit.

Justin, you asked a question about Prime Minister Cameron and whether a particular issue had come up, but I couldn't tell -- it was hard to hear which issue you were asking about.  Can you repeat the beginning?

Q    Sure.  Defense spending -- British defense spending.

MR. EARNEST:  What I do know is that the President does believe that it's important for all of our NATO allies to meet the commitments that they’ve made in terms of dedicating sufficient resources to ensure the defense of our alliance.  I’m not able to say at this point whether or not it will come up in the meeting, but there will be some press access and both leaders will make statements after their bilateral meeting.  So hopefully we’ll be able to gather some more information after that meeting has concluded.  But this is something that the President believes is a priority and something that he does not hesitate to raise when he is meeting with our NATO partners.

Now we’ll take questions in person.  Major, do you want to start?

Q    Sure.  Josh, you gave kind of a bland overall statement about Greece.  As you know, there are deadlines looming.  The President plays a significant role in offering U.S. opinions to specifically the Germans.  Did the President in any way communicate a willingness to shift the deadline, or did he ask Angela Merkel through the IMF to keep the deadlines as they are and the repayment schedules as they are currently understood, and that Greece should meet those obligations in order to avoid the volatility you referred to?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, Major, it is important to point out that these are deadlines that are related to the financial commitments that Greece has made to their creditors.  And so exactly how they’ll meet those deadlines and what sort of agreements they’ll reach to ensure that there isn’t undue volatility that’s added to the financial markets is something for Greece and all of their creditors to resolve.  And the United States has played a role in trying to support the completion of those conversations, again, in a way that will hopefully avoid any unnecessary instability in the global financial markets.

Q    Did he characterize that role in this particular conversation?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, I mean, the fact is that Chancellor Merkel has played a very important role in this process.  And our interest here is in ensuring that this eventually gets resolved. And this has obviously been the subject of extensive conversations that Secretary Lew has had.  He had the opportunity at the G7 Finance Ministers meeting that occurred in Dresden last week to meet with his counterparts and to urge all parties to find common ground and to promptly reach an agreement.  He had the opportunity to speak with the Prime Minister Tsipras and emphasize that the United States remains engaged with all of the parties to try to facilitate this satisfactory resolution.

Q    Did he talk to Tsipras from Dresden, or was this is a new --

MR. EARNEST:  No, that was Lew and Tsipras from Dresden.

So the point is that the principal interlocutor from the United States has been Secretary Lew.  But, again, our effort is to bring all sides to the table and encourage them to resolve their differences in a way that doesn’t destabilize the global financial markets.  And we’re heartened by the fact that there is an interest on all sides for the satisfactory resolution of this particular situation.  And we’re pleased that Greece continues to send what we believe are the right signals about their desire to remain in the EU and remain in the currency union, and their partners and the other members of the union want to include them. And so it’s a matter of working through those details, and we continue to encourage them to do so constructively. 

Q    Does the U.S. have a philosophical or economic point of view on repayment schedules as they are, or if flexibility should be brought into the conversation or flexibility around the deadline?

MR. EARNEST:  Again, what we have impressed upon both parties is the need to reach a satisfactory conclusion that we believe is in everybody’s interest.  And they all have acknowledged publicly and privately that they share an interest in resolving this, as well, in a way that prevents significant volatility in the global financial markets and preserves the current composition of the European currency union. 

Greece wants to remain a part of it.  Their partners, the members of that union, want them to remain part of it.  And so the challenge is taking the necessary steps to chart that constructive path, again, that will build on the commitments that Greece has already made to crucial structural reforms but also allow Greece to return to sustainable long-term growth.  And this is ultimately something that will have to be resolved among the parties, among Greece and its creditors.

Jim.

Q    Josh, what is the administration’s take -– it’s a fairly new development but it happened this weekend that Iraqi forces apparently were able to retake the city of Baiji.  And what does that say about the so-called will to fight?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, Jim, we’ve seen these reports.  We’ve been unable to confirm them at this point.  And so we’re going to continue to try to learn more about what exactly is happening inside the city of Baiji.  It is our understanding that the Baiji refinery, which has also been the site of extensive fighting, is an area that continues to be contested and that is an area that has –- or that has been an area where military coalition airstrikes have taken place in support of Iraqi security forces.

What we continue to believe and what we’ll continue to support is the effort of Iraqi security forces that are under the command and control of the Iraqi central government pushing back on ISIL.  And there are a variety of ways that the U.S. and our coalition partners can support that ongoing effort.  We’ve talked about this quite a bit.  This is training and equipping; this is offering some military advice; and this includes the use of coalition military airpower that has proved to be a very valuable addition to the efforts of Iraqi security forces on the ground. 

And so we’re going to continue to learn more about what exactly has happened around Baiji City and we’re going to be continuing to support ongoing efforts in other parts of the country, including in Anbar Province, which has been the site of setbacks recently.  But we continue to be encouraged about the commitment of Iraqi security forces in Anbar to taking the fight on the ground to ISIL in that province and pushing them back.  And that will require sustained effort, and the United States and our coalition partners are working to determine what additional assistance we can provide to ensure the success of those efforts.

Q    Just to switch to Russia.  I don't know if you saw the interview that President Putin gave to the Italian newspaper, Il Corriere della Sera, during which he said, “Only a sane person and only in a dream can imagine that Russia would suddenly attack NATO.”  He seems to be saying that all of these concerns are unfounded among the NATO partners about their activity in Eastern Europe.  I guess what is your take on that?  What do you make of those comments?  And is his absence -- I mean, Russia was part of the G8.  Is his absence felt here?  Does Vladimir Putin’s name come up in conversations -- well, if he were here, what would he say about any particular subject?

MR. EARNEST:  As best I can tell, the way that President Putin’s name comes up is that it comes up in the context of the leader of a country that is increasingly isolated from the international community and that isolation is a result of the ongoing destabilizing activities of Russia in eastern Ukraine.

We have talked for quite some time about intelligence reports that indicate that Russia continues to move weapons and personnel across the Ukrainian border into eastern Ukraine to support the ongoing efforts of separatists in that region of Ukraine.  We know that Russia maintains a force presence in eastern Ukraine and Russian soldiers play an integral role in sustaining and directing the fighting there.  We know that Russian officers serve in leadership roles in the combined Russian separatist force and that they have been instrumental in organizing the force and planning operations.  We know that the Russian military continues to maintain advanced air defense systems in eastern Ukraine.  And we know that combined Russian and separatist forces have conducted extensive training in eastern Ukraine over the last several months, and the complex nature of the training leaves no doubt that Russian military instructors are involved.

All of this underscores the degree to which Russia has essentially thumbed their nose at the commitments that they made in the context of the Minsk negotiations.  And Russia’s failure to live up to those commitments is what leads to their increasing isolation and the increasing costs being imposed on their economy.  And to the extent that President Putin’s name is raised in the context of this summit, it’s raised specifically in the context of his ongoing refusal to live up to specific commitments that he’s already made.

Christi.

Q    So given that, where did things -- where did President Obama and Chancellor Merkel leave things in their conversation?  Are we at sort of stasis?  Was there any more clarity on how long they would be willing to wait for Russia to comply with the terms of the agreement, and what they’ll do in the meantime?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, I’ll say a couple things about that.  The first is that Chancellor Merkel and President Obama agreed that preserving the unity of the United States and principally our European allies and partners is a top priority, and that it’s important for us to coordinate and cooperate in our response to Russia’s destabilizing activities in Ukraine.  And there was a shared view and a shared hope that we’ll be able to preserve that unity with respect to our sanctions program moving forward. 

The second thing that’s important is to ensure that as Ukraine pursues economic reforms in those areas of the country that are not affected by Russia’s destabilizing activities, or at least not directly affected by Russia’s destabilizing activities, that the international community continue to support Ukraine as they make those reforms.

And obviously, the United States has made a significant financial commitment to Ukraine; the IMF has made an important financial commitment to Ukraine and their economy.  And that ongoing support of their economic reforms will continue to be important in those areas of Ukraine that are not directly threatened by the separatists.  And for Ukraine to withstand the destabilizing activity in one region of the country, they’re going to need continued support from the international community when it comes to their economy. 

And the United States has already demonstrated a commitment to being a strong partner of Ukraine.  We will, moving forward.  We’ve seen a number of international organizations step up and offer that support, and we’re hopeful that other G7 countries will demonstrate a similar level of commitment to Ukraine as they pursue those important economic reforms as well.

Q    Any conversation about military aid or increased economic aid?

MR. EARNEST:  No details that I am prepared to discuss from here.  I can tell you that the President’s view has not changed about, at this point, not providing additional offensive military assistance to Ukraine.  As you know -- and this is something we’ve talked about quite a bit -- there is a substantial amount of assistance -- military assistance that the United States has already provided to Ukraine.  And again, I think that reflects the depth of the U.S. commitment to Ukraine.  But providing additional offensive military capabilities to Ukraine, in the mind of the President, would only further escalate a situation that must be resolved diplomatically.  And that continues to be the target that we have set.

Nedra.

MR. EARNEST:  Can I follow up on a couple of things from the pool?  I know you can’t read out the meeting today, but what was the President’s message going into the fellow leaders on trade and TPA?

MR. EARNEST:  Obviously, these leaders have been carefully following the political debate in the United States.  A couple members -- a couple leaders -- a couple of G7 leaders represent countries that are parties to TPP -- Canada and Japan, specifically.  And there are other countries who are part of the G7 but not part of TPP that are interested in trying to lower existing trade barriers for the benefit of citizens in both our countries.

And I think the President’s philosophical view of this is something that he has expressed in public quite a bit lately -- that he does believe that there is an opportunity for the United States and middle-class families in the United States to benefit from expanded economic opportunities around the globe; that if we can level the playing field, that will only benefit -- or it will certainly benefit the American economy and middle-class families.

And so to the extent that it comes up in these conversations -- and I think that it will -- I think the President will restate that philosophical view.  And there’s no doubt that -- well, there’s no doubt that the President hopes that that is a view that is shared by others at the G7, and I think it largely is.

Q    And on climate, what’s his goal there?  You mentioned that the G7 countries have already made commitments, so is there more to accomplish here at this meeting?  And what does he hope will come out of it?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, I would anticipate that this is something that they will discuss.  As is true in the United States, making these kinds of commitments to reduce carbon pollution post-2020 are not easy.  These often require important investments and significant reforms of certain elements of the economy.  The President’s view is that if we can -- that by making this serious commitment early when it comes to the United States economy that it will actually open up economic opportunity for American businesses; that the sense is that if we can continue to make investments in renewable energy -- things like wind and solar -- if we can make continued gains when it comes to efficiency, that that will have important economic benefits for the country as a whole.  And that's why the President has pursued this so directly, in addition to the moral imperative of acting on climate change.

So this will be the subject of -- because these are serious commitments and they do have an economic impact, they will -- I'm confident this is something that will be discussed quite a bit among the leaders at the G7.  At this point, I don't know yet what kind of results will be announced out of those discussions, but we may have more on this for you tomorrow.

Q    And one non-G7 question.  Netanyahu is complaining that the international community has been silent over rocket attacks from Gaza, and warning that a strong reprisal could be forthcoming.  Could you comment on that?

MR. EARNEST:  Nedra, this is not the first time that I stand at a podium like this and strongly condemn rocket attacks by extremists in Gaza against innocent Israeli citizens.  And clearly, the United States stands with the nation of Israel as they defend their nation and their people from these attacks. 

We did spend a lot of time talking about this last summer, that the United States has committed significant financial and military resources to assisting Israeli security forces in defending the Israeli people and protecting innocent Israelis from these kind of attacks.  And the United States will continue to stand with them as they do that.  And, again, that is something that we -- that has been our position for a long time and it continues to be our position today.

Q    Thank you, Josh.  For the very first time that G7 summit put maritime security on its agenda -- we note that the G7 foreign ministers already adopted a declaration on maritime security.  So will we see a similar declaration made by G7 leaders this time?

MR. EARNEST:  I don't know if there will be a declaration on this separately.  If there is, I don't have anything to preview. We have been clear, particularly as it relates to the South China Sea, about the importance of the free flow of commerce in that region of the world.  Disrupting that flow of commerce would have a significant impact on the global economy and would have a corresponding negative impact on the U.S. economy.  I think the same could be said for economies of the G7 member nations.

But at this point, I don't know whether or not there will be a formal declaration or a formal statement out of the G7.  But I'd encourage you to take a close look at the communique when it's issued tomorrow.

Q    Actually, this new agenda has caused some concerns, like the council on foreign relations just published an article that “like last year’s position to reject Russia, this development suggests that the G7 could be returning to its Cold War roots.”  So is the G7 returning to its Cold War roots?

MR. EARNEST:  The G7 is a group of democratic nations that are committed to a set of shared values, and we strongly encourage and seek to spread those values around the world.  And when our nations come together it sends a very powerful statement about how important those values are.  And so, again, there, I think, are some who -- particular President Putin -- who try to sort of restart or reignite a Cold War mentality.  But that certainly is not the perspective of the United States or other members of the G7.

Carrie.  Nice to see you.

Q    Nice to see you.  Two questions.  One is, was there any discussion of FIFA in any of the meetings today?  There was discussion here that that would come up -- there would be some leaders -- David Cameron would bring it up.  That's my first question.  The second question is much less serious, and that is when the President was drinking beer today, was it alcoholic or non-alcoholic?  (Laughter.) 

MR. EARNEST:  Carrie, I can say that, to my mild surprise, the FIFA issue did not come up in the President’s bilateral meeting with Chancellor Merkel.  But, again, given the heavy concentration of soccer fans at the G7 summit, I would not be surprised if at some point in the next 24 to 36 hours it does come up.

As it relates to the President’s beverage of choice today, I can tell you only that I'm not aware of what kind of beer the President was served, but I'm confident that he did not order a non-alcoholic beer. 

Q    -- reports he drank a non-alcoholic beer are inaccurate?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, again, I don't know what he was eventually served.  But I would be very, very surprised if he ordered a non-alcoholic beer -- even after an overnight flight on a Sunday morning. 

Julie.

Q    Thanks, Josh.  I wanted to ask about the meeting with -- the bilat with Abadi tomorrow.  What do you expect to come out of that?  What’s the President’s message going to be to the other G7 leaders about what comes next in the campaign against ISIL and how he plans to confront their accelerated gains -- what does he want to hear from them in terms of changing strategy, changing direction, or anything like that?

MR. EARNEST:  Our expectation at this point is that the participation of Prime Minister Abadi in tomorrow’s sessions will be an opportunity for the G7 nations to reiterate their continued support for the coalition that's been assembled to help Iraq face down the ISIL threat in the country.  It is in the economic interest of the G7 member nations to do so.  More importantly, it’s in the national security interest of each of those nations to do so.  That’s a consensus view, and the United States has certainly been appreciative of the financial and military commitments that have been made by our G7 partners to this broader military coalition.
 
I suspect, though I won’t speak for him, that Prime Minister Abadi will deliver a similar message, which is that he is grateful for the kind of support that he has seen from the international community.  I don’t know at this point whether or not he’ll have additional requests.  It continues to be the view of the United States, and I think this is a view that’s shared by our coalition partners, particularly our G7 members, that it’s critically important for Prime Minister Abadi to continue on the path that he has chosen, which is to govern that country in a multi-sectarian way and to ensure that security operations against ISIL are carried out in a multi-sectarian way.

Uniting the diverse country of Iraq to confront the ISIL threat will be critical to their success.  And we’ve seen evidence of this approach when it comes to the efforts of Iraqi security forces to face down ISIL in Anbar Province.  The Prime Minister has received strong support from his multi-sectarian cabinet, but also from Sunni leaders in Anbar, that the deployment of a multi-sectarian force in Anbar Province against ISIL isn’t just important, it’s actually something that they specifically requested.  And they welcome the support of the international community for local Sunni fighters in Anbar and they welcome the decision from Prime Minister Abadi to deploy even Shia fighters and Kurdish fighters that are under the command and control of the Iraqi central government. 

That’s an indication that Prime Minister Abadi’s multi-sectarian, inclusive approach is one that has the support of even Sunni leaders in Anbar Province.  Again, that is an indication that the strategy that we believe will be critical to their success is one that Prime Minister Abadi and other leaders in Iraq are committed to pursuing.

Q    What is the President’s position on the Prime Minister’s view that he has expressed as early as last week that he needs more help from the United States and other coalition partners to really be able to effectively counter ISIL?  And what’s your sense of the other world leaders’ view on that?  Is there (inaudible) --

MR. EARNEST:  I wouldn’t characterize the view of other G7 leaders on that particular issue.  The President has spoken to this and has made clear his willingness to -– well, actually, the President has made clear to his national security team that he is interested in looking for more efficient ways that we can offer assistance to Iraqi security forces, including Sunni fighters in Anbar that are under the command and control of the Iraqi central government.  And the President and his team are constantly reviewing their strategy and looking for lessons learned, particularly in those areas where the strategy has been successful in making progress against ISIl, using those lessons learned and applying those to the areas where we’ve experiences some setbacks.

But I’m confident this will be part of the kind of conversation that Prime Minister Abadi will have not just with President Obama but with other G7 leaders tomorrow.

Pamela.

Q    Josh, has anyone in the government been able to confirm that China was behind the hacking of the Office of Personnel Management?

MR. EARNEST:  Pam, as you know, this is an ongoing investigation by the FBI.  The FBI has been looking at this for some time.  They obviously have experts who have already learned important information about this particular intrusion.  But for any formal declarations about conclusions that they have reached, I’d refer you to the FBI. 

At this point, what I know is that the identity of the individuals who are behind this attack and the motivations of those who carried out this intrusion are still subject of the ongoing investigation.  And so I don’t want to say anything at this point that would get ahead of that ongoing investigation.

Q    Not too long ago, the President issued an executive order that said he had the authority to issue financial sanctions on people who were responsible for hacking.  If China or some other country like that were to be found guilty of doing that hacking, would he consider issuing financial sanctions?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, Pam, the reason that the President signed this executive order a couple of months ago is because it gives the U.S. government additional tools to respond to these kinds of incidents.  And this is authority that the President delegated to the Secretary of Treasury, who is typically responsible for administering financial sanctions like this.  And at this point, again, our investigators are still looking into who precisely carried out these intrusions.  But the option that the President put on the table for responding to these kinds of activities in the form of financial sanctions certainly is one that continues to be available to him and the administration with regard to this particular activity.

Q    This is the kind of incident that the sanctions would be aimed at or would be appropriate --

MR. EARNEST:  Well, that’s something that we’ll evaluate when we have more information about who precisely carried out these attacks and as we learn more about what their motive was.  But it certainly is possible that this new tool, financial sanctions, could be used to respond to this incident.  But that will become clearer once we have a better sense of who is responsible and what their motives were.

Chris.

Q    Thanks, Josh.  You said in an answer to Christi’s question about Russia that there’s a shared view and hope we’ll be able to preserve sanctions moving forward, which would indicate that there’s a concern that they won’t be able to.  And certainly it does seem that part of the strategy is sort of wait it out.  I’m wondering if you can tell us what the level of concern is -- and any more readout you can give us on what the strategy is, what they discussed in terms of moving forward?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, there is an acknowledgement –- there was an acknowledgement on the part of both President Obama and Chancellor Merkel that preserving the unity and coordination of the United States and our European allies and partners has been critical to our efforts to maximize the impact of economic sanctions against Russia, and preserving that unity moving forward is an important priority.  The reason it was discussed in the context of these meetings is that it will require action on the part of the Europeans to extend these sanctions.  And the President is certainly advocating that they extend the sanctions.

Q    There could be opposition?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, I think there is -- the sense is, is that there is certainly a view that this unity is important moving forward.  But ultimately, it will be up to the Europeans to make these decisions.  But we’re hopeful that they’ll do so keeping in mind our shared view that preserving this unity is really important.

Q    And in the early reporting following this morning’s events, there are indications that the Germans remain skeptical of the President following a series of spying scandals.  One newspaper called it a “pretty picture” that Merkel created basically to overshadow what it called a “smoldering espionage affair.”  And I wonder, with regards to all this and given the very real fact that Germans remain more skeptical about this, what the President’s message is directly to the American people as well as to Merkel.

MR. EARNEST:  Well, I would start by observing that the President was very pleased with the warm welcome he received this morning not just from Chancellor Merkel, but from the German citizens who attended the event.  And I do think that reflects the depth of the U.S.-German relationship.  This is a relationship that has enhanced the national security of both our countries, and there was even a comment from Chancellor Merkel about the critically important role the United States played in the reunification of Germany.  And this is the -- I believe this is the 25th anniversary of that reunification -- or the 20th anniversary, one of the two.  And that is, again, a testament to the depth of the U.S.-German relationship.

And I think it’s noteworthy that, in the context of their 45-minute or so bilateral meeting, that this particular issue did not come up between the two leaders.  And I think it’s an indication that of all of the priorities that our two countries have, that things like climate change, trade, preserving unanimity in terms of our response to Russia’s destabilizing activities in Ukraine, continuing to coordinate when it comes to our counter-ISIL efforts -- these are the priorities in our relationship, principally because by working together, we can enhance the national security and expand the economic opportunity of citizens in both our countries.

Terry.

Q    Josh, I just wondered if you could clarify the President’s policy on Ukraine sanctions.  What is he asking for here?  You say that the Russians have essentially been thumbing their nose at the commitments under the Minsk agreement and that they need to abide by that.  Is that enough?  Or is the return of Crimea to Ukraine in sovereignty part of the President’s policy on ending sanctions on Russia?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, Terry, what we have said since the day that we put these sanctions in place is that the United States and our partners put these sanctions in place because of our expectation that Russia should live up to the commitments that they made in the context of the Minsk negotiations.  And so we have made clear that we would begin relieving those sanctions if Russia began living up to their commitments that they’ve made in Minsk. 

Unfortunately, we’ve seen Russia do exactly the opposite, which is to, in fact, redouble their destabilizing activities in Ukraine.  And whether that is playing an important leading role in directing the activities of combined Russian separatist forces in Ukraine, or continuing to maintain advanced air-defense systems in eastern Ukraine, time and time again we have seen Russia walk away from important commitments that they had made.
And those sanctions will remain -- it’s our view that those sanctions should remain in place until we start to see Russia live up to their commitments.

Q    But Minsk doesn’t mention Crimea.  So is Crimea basically a lost cause?

MR. EARNEST:  No.  The United States continues to have concerns about the way that Russia has essentially annexed Crimea.  That is the source of continued concern and not something that the United States or members of the international community will tolerate.  We have expectations that countries around the globe will respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of other countries.  And the annexation of Crimea is certainly a violation of that important international principle.

But when it comes to these specific sanctions that we are hoping that the Russian -- or that the Europeans will continue to coordinate with us -- are directly related to commitments that Russia made in the context of the Minsk Implementation Plan.

Kevin.

Q    Josh, thanks.  You mentioned that at least for now, broadly speaking, there may be some hesitancy on the part of the Europeans to maintain sanctions on Russia.  I’m wondering if, in the background, there’s a reliance on natural gas and energy that’s behind that hesitancy.  And is there something that the President will announce or that he can do to increase, say, natural gas -- for example, exports here to Europe and our partners so that they become less reliant on Russian energy?

MR. EARNEST:  Kevin, that’s a good question.  I don’t have any announcement like that to foreshadow at this point.  But we have long acknowledged that the commitment required by our European partners to implement and maintain these sanctions is significant.  They have economies that are more integrated with Russia than the United States has, and so we recognize that many of the countries that we’re counting on to continue to enforce these sanctions are countries who do so at some sacrifice to their own economy.

I think that sends a pretty important signal about how big of a priority respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of another country actually is not just for the United States but for our European partners and allies.  We should not underestimate the significance of our European partners and allies working with us to impose these sanctions; that imposing these sanctions requires some of our European partners to make more significant economic sacrifices than the United States has to.

Q    I want to follow up on Chris’s question for just a second.  From the Germans’ perspective, the people -- I'm not saying they expect an apology for the surveillance that was conducted by the NSA, or maybe they would expect something like that.  Maybe the American people would expect that the President would stand up and say, you know what, we were wrong, this was not consistent with our values.  Is it too much to expect that something like that might come out of this particular summit?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, Kevin, I can tell you that in the bilateral meeting the President had with the Chancellor this issue did not come up.  I will say that I'm not going to be in a position to talk in a lot of detail about any classified programs.  I will say that the United States continues to value the important cooperation that we receive from the Germans on a variety of national security programs that are critical to protecting the German people and German interests around the globe.  But that kind of cooperation is also critical to American national security and to the safety and security of the American people.  And we're pleased to have that kind of cooperation on a range of national security programs with the Germans.

Q    Lastly, if I might ask something that's not G7 related. President Morsi has been sentenced to death.  Is it possible that there might be an economic cost if Egypt follows through on its plans to execute their former leader?

MR. EARNEST:  Kevin, we have raised concerns in the past about the politically motivated detention and even sentencing of prominent political figures in Egypt and even some, frankly, not prominent political figures.  But this kind of politically motivated action is contrary to the values of the United States and we have raised our concerns about it in the past and those are concerns that we continue to have and continue to express to the Egyptian authorities.

Yes, sir. 

Q    I have two questions on China.  One is about AIIB.  What kind of direction or perception does the President want to give inside G7?

MR. EARNEST:  Again, this is a topic that did not come up in the President’s meeting with Chancellor Merkel.  But I think this is -- the President participates actively and, frankly, plays a leading role in organizations like the G7 because we value the cooperation with our G7 partners on a range of international priorities, and that includes priorities related to the international economy.  So we're going to continue to seek to coordinate our efforts and cooperate on a range of issues.

That said, the U.S. policy on the AIIB has not changed and at this point we're not contemplating joining.

Q    The other question is about -- my colleague asked the same question -- what kind of outcome do you expect to come out of this summit?  You said that you don't know if there will be a declaration coming.  Is there going to be some kind of decision from the G7 --

MR. EARNEST:  Which issue are you talking about?

Q    Maritime issue, especially South China Sea.

MR. EARNEST:  Oh, I see.  Again, I don't have any -- I don't know at this point whether or not there is anything like that that's planned for the G7 communique, so I'd encourage you to take a look at it when it comes out tomorrow.

Jerome.

Q    Thank you, Josh.  Just to follow up on Greece -- does the President believe the Europeans should be more flexible towards Greece in order to avoid a potentially negative result?

MR. EARNEST:  Jerome, what we have indicated is that we believe that it's important for us to try to chart this path that acknowledges a couple of critically important goals.  The first is, it's important for Greece to build on structural economic reforms, but it's also important for Greece to return to sustainable, long-term growth.  And this means balancing some competing priorities, and it means that Greece and its partners will have to facilitate an agreement to try to pursue those priorities. 

The good news is that I think that all of the partners who are sitting at the table trying to negotiate this agreement understand that those are priorities and that those priorities are in the collective interest.  It certainly is in the interest of the United States for those parties to resolve their differences in a way that doesn’t inject unneeded instability and volatility into the global financial markets.

And so that's why the role that the United States has played -- principally, Secretary Lew -- has been to encourage the parties to come together to resolve their differences without brinksmanship or without threatening the deadline.  And there obviously is important work that needs to be done to achieve this goal and to achieve these shared priorities.  But given that all of the parties acknowledge that these priorities are in their collective best interests, we're optimistic that they’ll be able to do that.

Q    Two questions to follow up on climate change and maritime security.  First, on climate change.  Do you expect the G7 leaders to reach some kind of agreement for setting a new target or send a strong message tomorrow -- I mean, a new outcome to reach tomorrow -- do you expect?  And how the United States play an important role on this issue?  Because last year, President Obama said he would set an important, ambitious target with China, and President Xi is going to visit the United States in September.  So this issue will also be on the agenda.  So what is the United States role in this?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, the United States role has been to lead the world in confronting this issue.  And it was global news when the President traveled to China, and two of the world’s largest economies and two of the world’s largest emitters of carbon pollution -- the leaders of those countries stood on the same stage and made significant commitments to reducing carbon pollution.  And that was a significant development.  And it does reflect again -- and it reflects a commitment on the part of the Chinese to make some significant reforms to their economy.

In terms of the U.S., it’s going to require seizing on the opportunity that exists, particularly when it comes to the renewable energy industry and to efficiency gains, to attain this ambitious but achievable goal.  I think the fact that we have seen every G7 member nation make a specific commitment in advance of the Paris climate negotiations scheduled for December I think is an indication that there are other countries that are standing with the United States in leading this effort, and we certainly welcome those early commitments. 

As it relates to any sort of announcements out of the G7, I don’t have anything to preview at this point.

Q    And one on maritime security.  Do you believe that the G7 leaders could share the significance of this vital security issue?  Because, you know, there is (inaudible) the United States and Japan and the (inaudible) pursue economic ties with China.   Do you think the G7 leaders would unite on this issue?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, I only speak for one G7 leader, and we’ve made our views pretty clear.  I will just observe that the priority that we have identified, which is protecting the free flow of commerce in international waters, particularly in the South China Sea, has significant consequences for the global economy, and a significant negative impact on the global economy would have a negative impact on the U.S. economy and that’s been the source of our interest in this issue. 

A similar impact on European economies would also be felt if there were this disruption in the global economy.  And so, again, without speaking on behalf of them, I would just observe that that interest of the United States as identified is one that is not unique to the United States.

Yes, sir.

Q    Thanks, Josh.  So just circling back to President Putin, recently the Japanese government has indicated a willingness to invite Putin to Japan, to visit Japan.  Would the U.S. government support such a move?  And just secondly, I know you said you weren’t at the meeting in the first plenary session that you talked about, but do you think that President Obama pushed the Ukraine issue?  Similar to the way he pushed Angela Merkel, Chancellor Merkel, do you think he pushed that with the other leaders?

MR. EARNEST:  To take your second question first, I don’t know whether or not the President had the opportunity to make clear that international unity, and particularly European unity, around responding to Russia’s destabilizing activities in Ukraine is an American priority.  It is something that the President will have the opportunity to discuss over the context of the summit.  I don’t know if that’s something that he raised in the first plenary session, but I’m confident it's something that he will discuss with other G7 leaders while we’re here.

I was not aware of the invitation on the part of the Japanese to President Putin, so I don’t have a specific reaction to that.  What I will say is that we’re obviously –- Secretary Kerry met with President Putin a week or two ago in Sochi.  And we have indicated on the part of the United States that we have a rather complex relationship with Russia; that there have been areas where we’ve been able to -- in spite of our significant differences about Russia’s destabilizing activities in Ukraine, we’ve been able to cooperate on a range of issues that have been important to the national security of both our countries.  That’s been true as it relates to ridding Syria of their declared chemical weapons stockpile.  It’s also true when it comes to negotiating with Iran to prevent them from obtaining a nuclear weapon.  Russia has been an important and constructive contributor to that effort.

Anybody else?  I’ll give you the last one, sir.

Q    How can the difficulties to the North Korean nuclear issue and nuclear missile strategy -- (inaudible) the G7 leaders are worried against North Korea’s nuclear missile strategy.

MR. EARNEST:  Well, I would observe two things.  Without previewing what will eventually be included in the G7 communique, I would say it’s the U.S. belief that there is a global interest in dealing with the concerns about North Korea’s nuclear program. And we are interested in seeing North Korea come into compliance with a whole set of U.N. rules and regulations that they have flouted when it comes to their nuclear program. 

And I am confident this will be a topic of extensive discussion when the President has the opportunity to sit down with one of our closest allies in the region, the President of the Republic of Korea, and the President is looking forward to the meeting.

Thanks, everybody.

END  
6:42 P.M. CEST

President Obama's Bilateral Meeting with Prime Minister Cameron of the United Kingdom

June 07, 2015 | 4:23 | Public Domain

President Obama and Prime Minister Cameron of the United Kingdom meet during the G-7 Summit in Krün, Germany. June 7, 2015.

Download mp4 (159MB) | mp3 (11MB)

The President Delivers Remarks in Krün, Germany

June 07, 2015 | 8:44 | Public Domain

President Obama, on his fourth visit to the country as President, delivers remarks on the shared future of Germany and the United States.

Download mp4 (320MB) | mp3 (21MB)

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by President Obama and Prime Minister Cameron of the United Kingdom Before Bilateral Meeting

Schloss Elmau Krün, Germany

6:36 P.M. CEST
 
PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, it is wonderful to be back with my good friend and partner, David Cameron.  I want to congratulate him, as I did over the phone, on his resounding election victory.  And I look forward to working with him on a whole host of issues in the coming year.
 
This is going to give us an opportunity to discuss a number of particular challenges that require U.S. and United Kingdom leadership.  We’ll be talking about Russia and Ukraine, and the importance of us maintaining the sanctions regime to put pressure on Russian and separatist forces to implement fully the Minsk agreement.  We think that there can be a peaceful, diplomatic resolution to this problem, but it’s going to require that Europe, the United States and the Transatlantic Partnership, as well as the world, stay vigilant and stay focused on the importance of upholding the principles of territorial integrity and sovereignty.
 
We’ll have an opportunity to discuss the effort against ISIL and the situation in Iraq and Syria, and assess what’s working, what’s not, and how we can continue to make progress there in dismantling the infrastructure that ISIL has built, and in promoting the kinds of political inclusion in Iraq and ultimately in Syria that are going to be necessary for a long-term solution.
 
We’ll also have a chance to talk about hotspots like Libya and Nigeria, where, obviously, terrorism has gotten a foothold.  And more affirmatively, we’re going to have an opportunity to continue the discussion bilaterally that we have been having with the other G7 members around issues like trade and climate change, and the importance of U.S. and British leadership on those issues.
 
So I am very much looking forward to this conversation.  We have no closer partner around the globe on a whole host of critical issues.  I would note that one of the great values of having the United Kingdom in the European Union is its leadership and strength on a whole host of global challenges.  And so we very much are looking forward to the United Kingdom staying a part of the European Union because we think that its influence is positive not just for Europe, but also for the world.
 
But, David, again, congratulations.  Looking forward to continued work.
 
PRIME MINISTER CAMERON:  Well, thank you very much.  And it’s good to be back with my friend and close partner, Barack Obama, and working together over the coming years. 
 
As you said, Barack, there are so many issues to discuss at this meeting and bilaterally with our very close partnership, the partnership between Britain and the United States, that special relationship.  But they all really come down to two words:  prosperity and security -- what we want for our people back at home, which is the chance of a job, and also the chance to have greater security.
 
And whether we’re discussing the situation in the Ukraine, the need to fight Islamic extremist terrorism, particularly in Iraq and Syria, but elsewhere around the world, it’s about keeping people safe back at home, where the cooperation between our security and intelligence services and our military is as close as it’s ever been and as effective as it’s ever been.
 
We’ve also got a lot of issues to discuss that really will determine whether we can have successful, strong economies, like the need for these trade deals we were talking about earlier, and also the deal on climate change, which is going to be important for our future prosperity and security.
 
So a lot of issues to discuss tonight, and it’s great to be back together with you addressing them in this bilateral meeting as well as in the bigger G7.  So thank you very much.
 
PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Thank you, everybody. 
 
                        END                 6:41 P.M. CEST

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President in Krun, Germany

Krün, Germany

10:54 A.M. CEST
 
 
     THE PRESIDENT:  Gruess gott!  (Applause.)  It is wonderful to be back in Germany for my fourth visit as President.  And to my great friend and partner, Chancellor Merkel; to Mayor Schwarzenberger and the people of Krün and Cree; to the people of Germany -- thank you for welcoming me here today and for the incredible hospitality and the incredible beauty of this place.  (Applause.)  
 
I want to thank everybody for this wonderful visit to this beautiful village.  I know it's a lot of hard work when I come to town.  (Laughter.)  That was, without question, the best alphorn performance I’ve ever heard.  I have to admit that I forgot to bring my lederhosen.  But I'm going to see if I can buy some while I'm here.  (Laughter and applause.) 
 
Now, I must admit that when I first learned that Angela was going to host the G7 in Bavaria, I was hoping that it would fall during Oktoberfest.  But, then again, there’s never a bad day for a beer and a weisswurst.  (Laughter.)  And I can’t think of a better place to come to celebrate the enduring friendship between the German and American people.  (Applause.)  
 
I come here grateful for the history that we share.  And so much of America -- including my hometown of Chicago -- would not be the same without the contributions of so many German immigrants, including from Bavaria.  Over the years, Bavaria and Germany have returned the favor by welcoming countless Americans -- including generations of our servicemembers and students from the George Marshall Center.  And on behalf of the American people, I want to thank you for your gracious hospitality.  (Applause.)  
 
So over the next two days in Schloss Elmau, we’re going to discuss our shared future -- a global economy that creates jobs and opportunity; maintaining a strong and prosperous European Union; forging new trade partnerships across the Atlantic; standing up to Russian aggression in Ukraine; combating threats from violent extremism to climate change.  And on all these issues, we are very grateful for the partnership and leadership of your Chancellor, Angela Merkel.  (Applause.)  
 
These are all difficult challenges.  But part of what gives me hope is the example of Germany.  This year marks 70 years since the end of World War II -- and decades of a great NATO Alliance.  It marks 25 years since the unification of Germany that inspired the world.  The fact that all of us are here together today is proof that conflicts can end and great progress is possible.
 
So this morning, as we celebrate one of the strongest alliances the world has ever known, my message to the German people is simple:  We are so grateful for your friendship, for your leadership.  We stand together as inseparable allies -- in Europe and around the world.  (Applause.)
 
My only final request for Angela is that, on such a beautiful day, instead of being inside, we should have all our summit meetings in this incredible village center -- and drink beer.  (Laughter.)  But I think we'll have to negotiate with the security people.  (Laughter.)        
 
Vielen dank.  (Applause.)
 
                       END               11:03 A.M. CEST 
  

President Obama Delivers a Eulogy Honoring the Life of Beau Biden


"He did in 46 years what most of us couldn’t do in 146.

He left nothing in the tank. He was a man who led a life where the means were as important as the ends. The example he set made you want to be a better dad, or a better son, or a better brother or sister, better at your job, the better soldier. 

He made you want to be a better person. Isn’t that finally the measure of a man -– the way he lives, how he treats others, no matter what life may throw at him?" 

– President Obama


Today, the Biden family, President Obama, and Americans across the country paid their final respects to a good man who loved deeply, and was loved in return. 

A veteran of the Iraq war, the Attorney General of Delaware -- and most importantly -- a dedicated father, husband, and son, Beau Biden was a compassionate, empathetic, public servant who cared about what matters most in life, the people and country he loved. 

President Obama delivered a eulogy in honor of Beau Biden at St. Anthony of Padua Church in Wilmington, Delaware: 

 

President Obama and Vice President Biden Embrace at Beau Biden's Funeral

President Barack Obama embraces Vice President Joe Biden after delivering a eulogy during the funeral mass for Beau Biden at St. Anthony of Padua Roman Catholic in Wilmington, Del. June 6, 2015. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Trumpeter at Beau Biden's Funeral

A trumpeter before playing Battle Hymn of the Republic, during the funeral service for Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, at St. Anthony’s of Padua, in Wilmington, Del. June 6, 2015. (Official White House Photo by David Lienemann)

Vice President Biden and Dr. Biden touch Beau Biden's Casket

Vice President Joe Biden and his wife Dr. Jill Biden touch Beau Biden's casket following the procession during the funeral mass for Beau Biden at St. Anthony of Padua Roman Catholic in Wilmington, Del. June 6, 2015. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Related Topics: Delaware