Responding to Tropical Storm Debby

Tropical Storm Debby tracked eastward today, dropping as much as 20 inches of rain over parts of northern Florida. Local officials have closed portions of Interstate 10 due to flooding, and thousands have been left without power.

Earlier today, President Obama called Florida Governor Rick Scott to ensure that the state is receiving the kind of assistance it needs.

A FEMA liaison officer is currently onsite at the Florida emergency operations center to help coordinate if state emergency officialis determine they need additional support.

For more information including tips for staying safe if you're in the path of the storm, check out the FEMA blog or learn how to prepare for tropical storms at Ready.gov/hurricanes.

Related Topics: Additional Issues, Florida

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Readout of President Obama’s Call to Florida Governor Rick Scott

This morning President Obama called Florida Governor Rick Scott to ensure the state had no unmet needs as the Governor and his team continue to respond to extreme weather and flooding as a result of Tropical Storm Debby. The President expressed his condolences for the loss of life as well as the extensive damage to homes in Florida as a result of the storm, and reiterated that his Administration – through FEMA – would remain in close contact with the state as they continued to respond to this event and stood ready to provide additional assistance if necessary. At the request of the State, a FEMA liaison officer is onsite at the Florida state emergency operations center to support state response efforts as needed. The President asked Governor Scott to continue to identify any additional support his administration could provide, and told the Governor that his thoughts and prayers are with the citizens of Florida and the emergency response officials at this difficult time.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event

Private Residence
Weston, Massachusetts

9:34 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you, everybody.  Thank you.  (Applause.)  You don't need to stand up again.  No, you already did that, come on, come on.  (Applause.)  Thank you, everybody.  Thank you so much.  (Applause.) 

Let me, first of all, thank Doug and Judy and George and Lizbeth.  What a spectacular evening.  You guys could not be more gracious.  And if this is the first time you've done this -- you're actually quite good at this.  (Laughter.)  So just want to let you know that you're doing fine.  (Laughter.)  Really.

A couple other people who are here -- as was mentioned, Rob Barber has been an extraordinary friend for many, many years.  And so we thank him for all of his support.  (Applause.)  We've also got somebody who I met when I was still running for the U.S. Senate and has been a wonderful friend all these years -- your Treasurer, Steve Grossman, is here.  (Applause.)  Where is Steve? There he is. 

And finally, let me just say that somebody who I genuinely consider a brother -- I don't mean that in the vernacular.  (Laughter.)  I mean somebody who -- when I think about people who I admire, I care about, who I just think is good people and who articulates a vision of what this country should be as well as anybody in this country -- it's your Governor, Deval Patrick.  (Applause.)  I love the guy.  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Deval Patrick.  (Applause.) 

So some of you were at Symphony Hall, and I had a chance to give a long speech.  And what I'd like to do tonight -- take advantage of the fact that we have an intimate setting -- I'm not going to give a long speech at the front end.  What I'd rather do is have a conversation, answer your questions, take some comments. 

But let me just say at the top that many of you were involved in the election in 2008, and in some ways when I talk to my political team about -- and reminisce about 2008, it was like lightening in a bottle.  It captured a spirit and an energy and an electricity that was spectacular.  And I couldn't be prouder of the campaign we ran in 2008. 

But in some ways, this election is more important than 2008. In some ways, the stakes are higher.  Because back in 2008, there was some overlap between Democrats and Republicans on some important issues.  The nominee from the other party believed in climate change, believed in campaign finance reform, believed in immigration reform.  And what we’ve seen in the face of probably the worst financial crisis and economic crisis of our lifetimes is that the Republican Party has moved in a fundamentally different direction, so that on every issue we have fundamental choices that are at stake that will determine not just how we do tomorrow or the next day, but for the next 10 years or the next 20 years. 

And I’ve said this before and I believe it -- this is a make-or-break moment for who we are as a country and the values that we live by.  And I think it's a make-or-break moment for the middle class in this country, or everybody who is aspiring to get into the middle class. 

Obviously we're still recovering from the financial crisis and the economic crisis, and there are a lot of people who are still out of work, and a lot of homes that are still underwater, and a lot of businesses that are still struggling.  But for a decade before that crisis, what we had seen was that the basic bargain that built this country, that allowed so many of us to be successful -- the notion that if you work hard, no matter who you are, where you come from, what you look like, who you love, you can make it; that if you're responsible and you look after your family and you apply yourself, you can support a family and have a home and send your kids to college so they can do better than you ever imagined -- that basic compact had been eroding -- so that job growth had been more sluggish in the previous decade than any time in the previous 50 years, and a few people were doing extraordinarily well, but for more and more people it was a struggle just to keep up. 

And it was papered over for a while through debt and home equity loans and credit cards, but that was a house of cards that all came tumbling down.  And so, even as we work on the immediate task of putting people back to work and getting the economy growing faster, we've got this underlying challenge that we have to meet.  And that is, how do we get back to an economy that is built to last, and where everybody has got a fair shot and everybody is doing their fair share and everybody is playing by the same set of rules? 

And in answering that question, we've got two fundamentally different visions -- one vision that essentially can be summed up as get rid of all regulations and cut taxes for another $5 trillion, a top-down approach to economic growth. 

And I've got a different vision that says we are entrepreneurs and rugged individualists, and we don't expect to help people who don't want to help themselves, but we also believe in a common good.  And we believe in things like a public education system and colleges and universities that give everybody a chance to succeed.  And we believe in investing in science and technology, so that these extraordinary discoveries can then be used to create entire industries and provide opportunity for more and more people. 

And we believe in creating a great infrastructure, so businesses can move people and products and services seamlessly throughout our global economy.  And we believe in a tax code that is fair and balanced, in which success is rewarded, but in which we also are paying for those investments that allow us to pass on a great country to the next generation.

And we believe in an energy program that taps into American energy, but also makes sure that we're taking care of our environment and we're not subject to the whims of what happens in some country in the Middle East at any given moment.

And we believe in American manufacturing -- not because manufacturing is going to be as central to today's economy as it was back in the 1950s, but when we make things and produce things and sell things around the world, there is a basic strength to our economy that ripples everywhere, and gives more and more the chance to get ahead, just as the auto industry did for two or three generations, which is exactly why we had to intercede to make sure that they succeeded.

So on each of these issues about the economy, there are profound, fundamental differences.  And we had a stalemate in Washington now for three years.  And you, the American voter, is going to have to break that stalemate. 

Now, that's before we start getting into foreign policy, where my opponent thinks that it is tragic that I ended the war in Iraq the way I did, or that resists setting a timeline for getting out of Afghanistan; that doesn't capture the differences we have on things like women's health, where my opponent wants to end funding for Planned Parenthood or restrict access to birth control. 

It doesn’t capture the differences we have on something like "don't ask, don't tell."  I think if you love this country, it shouldn't matter who you love, you should be able to serve.  (Applause.) 

The Supreme Court, immigration reform, environmental protection -- you name it, there's a fundamental choice involved.

So this is going to be a close election -- not because people are particularly persuaded by the argument the other side is making -- it's the same, old argument they've been making for the last 30, 40 years.  It's going to be close because people are scared and frustrated, and there are a lot of folks who are still out of work and the economy is still tough.  And the other side is spending more money than we've ever seen before, trying to tap into those anxieties.  They're betting they don't have to offer much; they just say things aren't good and it's Obama's fault.  

The good news is that as I've traveled around the country over the last several years, what I've realized is that core decency and strength and common sense of the American people, it wins out in the end.  When folks are mobilized and activated, and when we're out there speaking truth, over time it breaks through. It wins out. 

But it doesn't happen automatically.  It happens because of effort.  It happens because of determination.  And although it is true that I'm a little grayer now than I was when I met some of you the first time -- (laughter) -- my determination is undiminished.  I am as fired up as I ever was.  And I hope you're ready to go.  (Applause.) 

Thanks.  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  (Applause.)
 
END
9:45 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event

Symphony Hall
Boston, Massachusetts

7:41 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, Boston!  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Thank you, Boston.  Thank you.  Thank you.  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Thank you, Boston.  Thank you.  Thank you so much.  Thank you.  Please, everybody have a seat.  Oh, it is -- (laughter) --

AUDIENCE:  Four more years!  Four more years!  Four more years! 

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  Well, it is good to be back in Boston.  (Applause.)  Good to be back in Massachusetts. 

I want to make some acknowledgments here.  First of all, you’ve got one of the finest governors in the country in Deval Patrick.  (Applause.)  You’ve got one of the finest mayors in the country in the Tom Menino.  (Applause.)  You’ve got an outstanding state auditor in Suzanne Bump.  (Applause.) 

And I just want to thank Elizabeth for that introduction, and let you know how lucky all of you are to have a chance to vote for her in the next election.  (Applause.)  Nobody fought harder for Wall Street reform -- the reform that is now law and protecting consumers all across the country -- than Elizabeth, reform that will end taxpayer bailouts, make sure folks aren’t being taken advantage of by mortgage lenders and credit card companies.  She has been a fierce advocate since before I knew her for the middle class.  She has been advocating on core issues that matter to families her entire career.  She is going to be an outstanding senator from Massachusetts, and everybody here has got to turn out for her.  (Applause.) 

I want to thank Miri Ben-Ari for her outstanding talent.  (Applause.)  We appreciate her appearing here today.  I will not sing today, even though -- (laughter) -- when I’m in Symphony Hall, I’m tempted.  (Applause.)  I am tempted, but -- (laughter and applause) -- can’t do it.  We have some serious business to attend to.  (Laughter.) 

I also want to acknowledge former Governor Michael Dukakis, who is here, and his lovely wife Kitty.  (Applause.)  And finally, Bos, I just want to say thank you for Youkilis.

AUDIENCE:  Booo --

THE PRESIDENT:  I’m just saying.  He’s going to have to change the color of his "sox."  (Laughter and boos.)  I didn’t think I’d get any “boos” out of here, but -- (laughter) -- I guess I shouldn’t have -- I should not have brought up baseball. I understand.  My mistake.

AUDICEN:  Booo --

THE PRESIDENT:  My mistake.  You’ve got to know your crowd.  (Laughter.)

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  We still love you!  (Laughter and applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Now, Boston, I’m here not just because I need your help -- although I do.  I’m here because the country needs your help.

Now, in 2008, we came together not just to support a candidate -- it wasn’t just about me.  When you support a guy named Barack Obama, you’re not doing it because you thought it was a sure thing.  (Laughter.)  The reason we came together in 2008 was because we had a shared vision about what’s best in this country.  We wanted to reclaim the basic bargain that made America what it is, that built the largest middle class in history, that built the most prosperous nation on Earth -- that compact that binds us together as a people, that binds us together as citizens.  We believed that in America, your success shouldn’t be determined by the circumstances of your birth.  (Applause.) 

We believed that if you worked hard, you should be able to find a good job; if you meet your responsibilities, you should be able to support your family and own a home, maybe start a business, give your kids opportunities you could not have imagined -- no matter who you are, no matter what you look like, no matter where you come from, no matter who you love, no matter what your last name is. 

It’s that basic bargain that allowed Michelle and I to succeed.  It’s that basic bargain that took a young kid from the South Side of Chicago to become the governor of the Commonwealth. It’s that basic bargain that brought a lot of your parents or grandparents or great-grandparents to these shores from countries where that ideal didn’t take root.  And it was that basic bargain, that simple dream, that we understood had been slipping away for too many Americans. 

We’ve gone through a decade in which surpluses were turned into deficits, in which two wars were fought on a credit card, in which a few people were doing very well but more and more people were having trouble just getting by, no matter how hard they worked -- all of which culminated in the worst financial crisis of our lifetimes.  And after that crisis, that dream seemed even more tattered, even more frayed.  

And so we went to work.  And over the last three-and-a-half years, step by step, we've tried to rebuilt the foundations of that dream, making sure that we reformed our financial system so that reckless bets didn’t always bring down our economy; making sure that people who are out there working hard don't have to worry about being bankrupt just because somebody in their family gets sick; making sure that young people are able to get the assistance they need to go to college and make something that approximates their dreams. 

And because of the incredible resilience and the incredible hard work, the toughness of the American people, we’ve begun to see progress -- created over 4 million jobs over the last three-and-a-half years -- (applause) -- 800,000 in the last few months alone.  (Applause.)  When some were saying let’s go ahead and let Detroit go bankrupt, we bet on the American worker and American industries.  (Applause.)  And today the U.S. auto industry is back on top and getting stronger.  (Applause.)  

But what we also understand is, is that there are way too many people out there who are still struggling, too many people whose homes are underwater, too many small businesses that are still finding it hard to get financing and keep their doors open.

And so the debate in this election is not whether we have more work to do.  Of course the economy is not where it needs to be.  Of course there are too many folks still struggling.  Of course we need to do better.  These challenges were built up over years.  They weren’t created overnight; they weren’t going to be solved overnight.  But the debate in this election is how do we grow the economy faster?  How do we create more jobs?  Moving forward, how do we create more opportunity?  How do we pay down our debt?  How do we reclaim that basic bargain that makes America the greatest nation on Earth?  How do we do it?

And this is not just your usual run-of-the-mill Washington Beltway argument.  This is the defining issue of our time.  It is a make-or-break moment for our middle class, and the next President and the next Congress will be setting the course on the economy, on deficits, on taxes, not just for today, not just for tomorrow, but the next decade, the next two.  This election will have an enormous impact on the country we live in today, but more importantly, it’s going to have an impact on the country we pass on to our children. 

Now, what’s holding us back from meeting these challenges -- as much progress as we’ve made -- what's holding us back still is not a lack of big ideas, it’s not a lack of technical solutions. All the options are out there.  Everybody knows what’s holding us back is a stalemate in Washington between two fundamentally different visions of which direction we should go.

And this election is your chance to break that stalemate.  This election is your chance to move this country forward. (Applause.)  This is your choice.  (Applause.) 

And let’s be clear about what these choices are.  Mr. Romney and his allies in Congress, they’ve got a very particular theory about how you grow the economy.  They believe we should go back to the top-down economic policies of the last decade.  You can sum them up fairly simply.  They believe that if we eliminate regulations and cut taxes by trillions of dollars, that will free up the marketplace and will solve all our problems.  That's the essence of their argument.  They argue if we help corporations and wealthy investors maximize their profits by whatever means necessary -- whether through layoffs or outsourcing or union-busting -- that that will automatically translate into jobs and prosperity that benefit all of us.  That's their theory. 

And that's not an exaggeration.  Just last week, it was reported that Governor Romney’s old firm owned companies that were "pioneers" -- this is not my phrase, but how it was described in the report -- "pioneers" in the business of outsourcing American jobs to places like China and India. Yesterday, his advisors tried to clear this up by telling us that there was a difference between "outsourcing" and "off-shoring."  (Laughter.)  Seriously.  You can’t make that up.  (Laughter and applause.) 

What Mr. Romney and his advisors don't seem to understand is this:  If you’re a worker whose job went overseas, you really don’t need somebody explaining you the difference between outsourcing and offshoring.  (Laughter.)  What you need is somebody who is going to wake up every day fighting to make sure that investments and jobs are happening here in Massachusetts, and here in the United States of America.  That's what you need. (Applause.)

And let me be clear.  We all believe in the free market.  We all believe that risk-takers and entrepreneurs need to be rewarded.  It's that dynamism that built this country.  But we also believe in shared prosperity.  I want to close the outsourcing loophole in our tax code.  I want to give tax breaks to companies who create jobs and manufacturing right here in the United States of America.  (Applause.)

And this particular commitment to outsourcing isn't just part of his record.  It's part of an overall economic theory that Republicans in Congress want to implement if they win this election.  It's been voted on in Congress.  It's right there on Governor Romney's website.  They promise to roll back all kinds of regulations on banks and polluters, insurance companies, oil companies.  They don't want to just keep all of the Bush tax cuts in place, including tax cuts for folks who don't need them and weren't asking for them; they want to add another $5 trillion in tax cuts on top of that, including a 25 percent tax cut for every millionaire in this country. 

Now, you may be wondering, how do they spend $5 trillion on new tax cuts and still keep a straight face when they say that their plan would reduce the deficit?  This is a good question that you're asking yourselves.  (Laughter.)  Boston has a lot of smart people in it.  (Laughter.)  And I'm sure that we probably have some MIT grads here.  (Applause.)  See -- math majors, they're thinking $5 trillion, all right, how does that add up?

Well, they start by proposing a trillion dollars in cuts to things like education and training, medical research, clean energy.  But that’s only a trillion dollars, so that's not enough.  So then they propose eliminating health care for about 50 million Americans and converting Medicare into a voucher program.  But that’s still not enough.  So then they also have to effectively raise taxes on the middle class by taking away tax deductions for everything from health care, college, retirement, homeownership -- which could cost families thousands of dollars.

Now, this is on their websites; they voted on these plans.  That's the entirety of their economic approach.  That's it.  There's nothing new there.  We've tried this, by the way.  When Mr. Romney tells us that he is some sort of financial wizard who can fix our economy, this is how he intends to do it. 

Now, if you're a person who thinks this plan sounds like a good idea, if we want to try the same policies that we just implemented in the last decade and did not work -- those folks should vote for Mr. Romney.  They should reelect the Republicans who have been running this Congress.  And together, I promise you this is the path they'll take America down.  They're more than qualified to do it.  (Laughter.)

But I believe their policies have been tested, and their policies have failed.  And that’s because in this country, prosperity hasn't come from the top down.  It's come from a strong and growing middle class.  It's come from people striving to get into that middle class.  It's come from successful, thriving small businesses that turned into medium-sized businesses and large businesses.  It comes from consumers who are seeing enough income and wage increases that they can afford to buy great products and services from businesses -- and the entire economy grows.

We do not need more top-down economics.  We need a plan for better education and training so that our young people can take advantage of the marketplace; for energy independence and innovation and infrastructure.  And we need a tax code that encourages companies to create jobs here in the United States, and a tax code that asks the wealthiest Americans to help pay down our deficit.  That's what we need.  (Applause.)  That's what we need.  (Applause.)  

There's nothing radical about that vision.  That’s the vision that built this country.  It was part of what used to be a bipartisan consensus.  We don’t expect government to solve all our problems.  This notion that somehow there's been some heavy tilt to the left on the part of the Democratic Party -- over the last three years, I cut taxes for the typical working family by $3,600.  I cut taxes for small businesses 18 times, eliminated billions of dollars in regulations that didn’t make sense and weren't making people healthier or safer.

I don’t believe we should be in the business of helping people who refuse to help themselves.  I don't think government can solve every problem.  But I do share this basic belief with our first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln, who said that through government we should do together what we cannot do as well for ourselves, -- (applause) -- that there is a place for us to work on the common good, that there's a common good that we invest in together.   

That’s how we built this country -- together.  We built railroads and highways -- together.  We built the Hoover Dam and the Golden Gate Bridge -- together.  We sent my grandfather’s generation to college on the GI Bill -- together.  We invented -- we invested in basic science that led to unimaginable discoveries -- we did those things together.  Because we understood it made us all better off.  It gave us all opportunity -- because it created a platform where everybody could succeed. 

If you were willing to work hard, you could succeed -- in part, because we had great schools, and we had built great roads, and we had a system in place that made sure that investors weren’t cheated when they put money into the stock market, and bank deposits were guaranteed, and polluters didn’t run wild.  All those things made us, together, better off and allowed us to succeed as one people, as one nation.  (Applause.) 

That’s the true lesson of our past.  That is the right vision for our future.  And, Boston, that is why I’m running for a second term as President of the United States -- because I want to move that vision forward.  (Applause.)  I want to move that vision forward.  (Applause.)     

I’m running to make sure that every American has a chance to get the skills and training that today’s jobs require.  I want to recruit an army of new teachers.  (Applause.)  I want to pay them better.  I want to hire more in areas like math and science.  I want to give 2 million more Americans the chance to go to community colleges and learn skills that local businesses are looking for right now.  (Applause.)  And I want to make higher education affordable for every American who’s willing to work for it -- not just by offering more loans and financial aid, but by bringing down the cost of college tuition -- (applause) -- because this is no longer an economic luxury.  Every young American needs the skills and the training to succeed in the 21st century economy.  (Applause.) 

Boston understands this.  Massachusetts understands this.  That's what we're fighting for.  That’s the choice in this election.  That’s why I’m running for President of the United States.  (Applause.)  

I’m running so that we have a future where we control our own energy.  That’s good for our economy, it's good for our national security, it's good for our planet.  (Applause.)  We need to end subsidies for oil companies that are making plenty of money on their own, and double down on a clean energy industry that’s never been more promising -- in wind power and solar power, and biofuels and fuel-efficient cars.  (Applause.)   

I’m running to make sure that the United States becomes -- continues to be the best place on Earth for innovation and discovery. 

And I'm proud that I kept the promise I made to you in 2008 -- we have ended the war in Iraq.  (Applause.)  We are transitioning out of Afghanistan. 

So I want to start doing some nation-building here at home. (Applause.)  I want to take half the money we’re no longer spending on war, use it to put people back to work rebuilding our roads, rebuilding our runways, rebuilding our ports, building wireless networks, building high-speed rail.  (Applause.)  Investing more in research, investing more in science -- all those ingredients that made us an economic superpower.  That’s the choice in this election. 

I’m running because we need to reduce our deficit, we need to manage our debt, and so I've put forward a plan -- $4 trillion of deficit reduction that is balanced and responsible, that allows us to cut spending we can’t afford, strengthens programs like Medicare for the long haul, and, yes, reforms our tax code so that the wealthiest Americans pay a little bit more -- (applause.) 

And just as Mr. Romney's theories and the Republicans in Congress, their theories have been tested, well, my theories have been tested as well, because that tax code that I described happened to be the tax code that was around when Bill Clinton was President, and we created 23 million new jobs, the biggest budget surplus in history.  (Applause.)  We created a whole lot of millionaires to boot.  Businesses did just fine.  (Applause.)    And you know there are plenty of patriotic, successful Americans all across the country -- I meet them every day -- who'd be willing to make this contribution again because they understand there is such a thing as the common good.  They understand that we’re in this thing together.

Mr. Romney disagrees with this vision.  His allies in Congress disagree with this vision.  Neither of them will endorse any policy that asks the wealthiest Americans to pay even a nickel more in taxes.  That’s the reason why we haven’t reached an agreement to lower our deficits.  That’s the reason my jobs bill that independent economists say would put 1 million more people back to work has been voted down time and time again.  It’s the biggest source of gridlock in Washington for the last three years. 

Which brings me back to where I started.  The only way we’re going to break that gridlock is through you.  Very rarely do you see such a stark choice in an election, with so much at stake.  On every challenge we face, you have the final say about where do we go from here. 

You can decide whether we keep our brave men and women in Afghanistan indefinitely, as Mr. Romney proposes, or whether we stick to the timeline that I established that allows us to finally bring our troops home.  That’s your decision.  (Applause.) 

You can decide whether we should restrict access to birth control or de-fund Planned Parenthood, or we can make a decision that in this country, women control their own health choices.  That’s a decision for you to make.  (Applause.) 

You can decide whether ending taxpayer bailouts of Wall Street banks was the right thing to do; whether protecting consumers from unscrupulous practices -- like Elizabeth fought for -- whether that's the right thing to do; whether preventing insurance companies from discriminating against people who are sick is the right thing to do; or allowing over 3 million young people to stay on their parent's health insurance plan, whether that's the right thing to do; or bringing down prescription drug costs for seniors was the right thing to do.  (Applause.)

I think it was the right thing to do.  (Applause.)  I know it was the right thing to do.  And it’s your choice whether we keep moving forward.  (Applause.)

You can decide whether we go back to the days where you could be kicked out of the United States military just because of who you are or who you love.  I know where I stand on this.  (Applause.)

You can decide whether it’s time to stop denying citizenship to responsible young people just because they were brought here as children of undocumented immigrants.  I know where I stand on this.  I know the choice I make.  (Applause.)

And you can decide whether we continue to have elections where multi-million-dollar donations, $10 million checks speak louder than the voices of ordinary citizens.

AUDIENCE MEMBERS:  No!

THE PRESIDENT:  This is going to be up to you.

This election will be close.  It will be close because there are a lot of folks who are still going through a tough time.  And even if they don't buy what the other side is selling, it’s hard [sic] in this environment sometimes for people to feel discouraged, for cynicism to creep in. 

And the other side, they feed on that.  They will spend more money than we have ever seen in American history, and their message is very simple.  They will just tell you that the economy is not where it needs to be, the economy is bad, and it’s all my fault.  (Laughter.)  They’ll tell you, Obama can't fix it because he thinks government is always the answer; or because he didn't make a lot of money in the private sector, so he’s in over his head; or because Obama thinks everything is -- everybody is doing just fine.  You’ll just hear those messages over and over and over again.  Scary voices in the ads.  (Laughter.)  Flashing at you.  (Laughter.)  That's what Mr. Romney will say.  That's what the Republicans in Congress will say. 

And I understand their approach.  I mean, it’s a plausible plan to win an election.  But it’s not a plan to create jobs.  It’s not a plan to grow the economy.  It’s not a plan to give all the people I meet around the country who are working so hard and struggling every day -- it’s not a plan to give them a handle on achieving their dreams.  It’s not a plan to rebuild our middle class. 

And ultimately, that's what we have to have.  We’ve got to have a plan that goes back to that basic bargain that we were fighting for in 2008, that basic compact between citizens that says, I’ve got a stake in your success.  (Applause.)  And that kid over in Dorchester who didn't have all the opportunities, or in South Boston who didn't have all the chances that I had, you know what, I’ve got a stake in his success.  I think I’ll be better off, my kids will be better off, if that kid gets an education.  (Applause.) 

That sense that you know what, I don't put on a hard hat every day when I go to work, but if I’m seeing the skyline rising and those construction workers out there building, you know somehow that's going to make my life better.  It’s going to help secure the future of my kids and my grandkids. 

And if I see an elderly couple strolling through the park and they're holding hands, and I know that they’ve got the security and dignity of a retirement that eases their anxieties, yes, that makes me feel better about my country.  It’s good for my life.  (Applause.)

We are not there yet.  This is hard work.  It’s always been hard.  Progress in this country has always been hard.  It’s never come easy.  There have been episodes, moments in our history where it looked easy, but it always involved struggle.  And what we started in 2008, I never promised you it was going to be easy. I told you then I wasn’t a perfect man and I wouldn’t be a perfect President.  But what I told was also that I promised you that every single day, I would tell you what I thought, I would tell you where I stood, and I’d wake up in the morning and I’d go to bed at night thinking about how I could make your lives better.  I would fight for you as hard as I could.  (Applause.)

And I’ve kept that promise.  I’ve kept that promise, Boston.  (Applause.)  I believe in you.  And if you believe in me, and if you agree with me about how we’ve got to give everybody a fair shot and we want everybody to do their fair share and we want everybody to play by the same rules, then I need you to stand with me for a second term as President.  (Applause.)

I need you to knock on doors with me.  I need you to make phone calls with me.  I want all of you to understand that if you share this belief -- and I believe a vast majority of the American people do -- and, in fact, I think there are Republicans out there who do.  (Laughter.)  They just can't admit it right now.  (Laughter and applause.)  I’ll work with anyone of any party who believes that we are in this together and believes that we will rise and fall as one nation, as one people.  That's what we’re fighting for right now.

Don't let anybody tell you we don't have the capacity to solve our challenges.  We do.  We’ve got the opportunities.  We are Americans, and we’ve never shied away from these kinds of fights.  But we’ve got to fix our politics, and you guys are the ones who are going to help fix it.  (Applause.)

So I hope you’re ready.  I hope you’re ready.  I hope you’re still fired up.  (Applause.)  And if anybody asks you what this campaign is about, you tell them it’s still about hope, and it is still about change, and we’re going to finish what we started in 2008.  (Applause.)  We’re going to move this country forward and remind the world why America is the greatest nation on Earth.

Thank you, everybody.  God bless you.  God bless America.  (Applause.)

END
8:24 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Readout of the President’s Phone Call with Prime Minister Monti of Italy

President Obama spoke with Italian Prime Minister Monti earlier today, following up on their discussions at last week’s G-20 meeting in Los Cabos.  Prime Minister Monti provided the President with an update on economic developments in Europe, and they discussed the importance of continued efforts to promote growth and stability in the Eurozone.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama Nominates Three to Serve on the US District Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, President Obama nominated Judge Sheri Polster Chappell, Katherine Polk Failla and Judge Troy L. Nunley to serve on the United States District Court.

“I am pleased to nominate these distinguished individuals to serve on the United States District Court bench,” said President Obama.  “I am confident they will serve the American people with integrity and a steadfast commitment to justice.”

Judge Sheri Polster Chappell:  Nominee for the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Judge Sheri Polster Chappell currently serves as a United States Magistrate Judge for the Middle District of Florida, a position she has held since 2003.  From 2000 to 2003, she served as a County Court Judge in Lee County, Florida.  Prior to her appointment to the bench, Judge Chappell served as an Assistant State Attorney in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit of Florida for thirteen years, from 1987 to 2000.  She received her J.D. from Nova Southeastern University Law School (formerly Nova Law Center) in 1987 and her B.A. in 1984 from the University of Wisconsin–Madison.

Katherine Polk Failla:  Nominee for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Katherine Polk Failla has been an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York since 2000.  For the past four years, Failla has served as Chief of the Criminal Appeals Unit, having previously served as Deputy Chief of the Unit from 2004 to 2008.  Prior to joining the United States Attorney’s Office, Failla spent six year in private practice at the law firm of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, where she handled commercial litigation and securities enforcement and litigation matters.  From 1993 to 1994, Failla clerked for the Honorable Joseph E. Irenas of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.  She received her J.D. cum laude in 1993 from Harvard Law School and her B.A. summa cum laude in 1990 from the College of William & Mary. 

Judge Troy L. Nunley: Nominee for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Judge Troy L. Nunley has been a judge on the Sacramento County Superior Court since 2002.  Previously, Judge Nunley served as a Deputy Attorney General in the California Attorney General’s office from 1999 until 2002.  Apart from a two-year stint as a sole practitioner from 1994 to 1996, Judge Nunley spent the remainder of his legal career serving as a Deputy District Attorney, first in Alameda County, California from 1991 to 1994, and more recently in Sacramento County, California from 1996 to 1999.  He received his J.D. in 1990 from University of California, Hastings College of the Law and his B.A. in 1986 from St. Mary’s College of California.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event

Oyster River High School
Durham, New Hampshire

2:34 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, New Hampshire!  (Applause.)  Hello, Durham!  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Thank you so much.  Thank you, everybody.  It is great to be back in New Hampshire.  (Applause.) 

A couple of people I want to acknowledge.  First of all, wasn't Scott outstanding?  Give Scotty a big round of applause for his introduction.  (Applause.)  I want to thank Todd Allen, who is the principal here at Oyster River High School.  (Applause.)  And I want to thank our outstanding Senator from New Hampshire, Jeanne Shaheen.  (Applause.)  And I want to thank all of you.  (Applause.) 

I know it's a little warm in here.  (Laughter.)  That’s okay.  That's okay.  It is wonderful to be back.  And I just have so many good memories here in New Hampshire, and I see some familiar faces and folks who were with me when people were still figuring out how to pronounce my name.  (Laughter.) 

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  We love you!

THE PRESIDENT:  I love you guys back.  I really do.  (Applause.) 

Now, I am back here in New Hampshire not just because I need your help -- although I do.  But more importantly, I'm here because your country needs your help. 

In 2008, we came together to reclaim the basic bargain that built this country -- the basic ideal of this country, the thing that created the largest middle class, the most prosperous nation in the history of the world.  We came together because we believe that in America, your success shouldn’t be determined by the circumstances of your birth.  (Applause.)  

Here in the United States of America, if you are willing to work hard, you should be able to find a good job.  If you’re willing to meet your responsibilities, you should be able to take care of your family, and own a home, maybe start a business, give your kids a better chance than you had -– no matter who you are, no matter where you come from, no matter what you look like, no matter who you love.  (Applause.)  That’s what we believe.  That’s what America is about.  (Applause.)  

That’s why we came together.  That’s why so many of you got involved in 2008.  It wasn't because you thought my election was a sure thing -- when you support a guy named Barack Obama -- (laughter) -- you know that’s not a guarantee.  But we shared that common sense of what America has been, and is, and must be for the future.  (Applause.)  

I ran for this office because for more than a decade, that basic bargain, that profound American Dream had been slipping away from too many people.  Before I took office, the worst economic crisis of our lifetime made it even worse. 

So, Durham, the debate in this election is not whether we need to do better -- everybody understands that our economy isn't where it needs to be.  There are too many people out there who are struggling, too many folks out of work, too many homes that are still underwater.  Of course, we need to do better.  The debate is not whether; it is how.  (Applause.)  How do we grow the economy faster?  How do we create more jobs?  How do we pay down our debt?  How do we reclaim that central American promise that no matter who you are, you can make it here if you try?

And this is not just the usual run-of-the-mill political argument.  This is not the usual Washington chatter -- there’s a lot of that.  But this, this is the defining issue of our time.  This is a make-or-break moment for our middle class, and folks who are aspiring to get into the middle class.  The next President and the next Congress will face a set of decisions -- on the economy, on deficits, on taxes -– that will have a profound impact not only on the country we live in today, but the country that we pass on to our kids.

And here’s why you’re so important -- because what’s holding us back from meeting the challenges we face is not the lack of big ideas, it’s not the lack of technical solutions.  Just about every policy and proposal, by now, has been put on the table; everybody knows what the options are.  What’s holding us back is a stalemate in Washington between two fundamentally different visions of which direction we should go.  (Applause.)

And, New Hampshire, this election is your chance to break the stalemate.  This election is your chance to move this country forward instead of seeing it go backwards.  That’s why I’m here. That’s why I need your help.  (Applause.)

AUDIENCE:  Four more years!  Four more years!  Four more years!

THE PRESIDENT:  Governor Romney and his allies in Congress, they believe -- they have a certain idea about how they would proceed if they’re in power.  They think that we should go back to the top-down economic policies of the last decade.

AUDIENCE:  No!

THE PRESIDENT:  They believe that if we eliminate regulations and we cut taxes by trillions of dollars, that the market will solve all of our problems on its own.  They argue that if we help corporations and wealthy investors maximize their profits by whatever means necessary -- whether it’s through layoffs or outsourcing or whatever steps it takes to maximize those profits -- that that automatically translates into jobs and prosperity for you.

AUDIENCE:  Booo --

THE PRESIDENT:  Now, just last week, it was reported that Governor Romney’s old firm owned companies that were "pioneers" in the business of outsourcing American jobs to places like China and India.  Now --

AUDIENCE:  Booo --

THE PRESIDENT:  So yesterday, his advisors were asked about this and they tried to clear this up by telling us there’s actually a difference between "outsourcing" and "off-shoring."  (Laughter.)  That’s what they said.  You cannot make this stuff up.  (Laughter.)

Now, what Governor Romney and his advisors don’t seem to understand is this:  If you’re a worker whose job went overseas, you don’t need somebody trying to explain to you the difference between outsourcing and offshoring.  You need somebody who's going to wake up every single day and fight for American jobs and investment here in the United States.  (Applause.)  That’s what you need.  That’s why I’m running.  (Applause.) 

Unlike Governor Romney, I want to close the outsourcing loophole in our tax code.  I want to give tax breaks to companies who create jobs and manufacturing here in New Hampshire, here in the United States of America.  (Applause.)

But what’s important to understand is Governor Romney’s commitment to outsourcing is not just part of his record, it’s part of an overall economic vision that he and Republicans in Congress want to implement if they win this election. 

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Hell, no!  (Laughter and applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  And, look, their plan is pretty simple.  It’s been voted on in Congress.  It’s right there on Governor Romney’s website.  First of all, they promise to roll back all kinds of regulation on banks and polluters and insurance companies and oil companies.

AUDIENCE:  Booo --

THE PRESIDENT:  So that’s step number one.  And then, second, they promise not only to keep all of the Bush tax cuts in place -- not just the ones for the middle class, but for everybody, for the wealthiest Americans -- but they also then want to add another $5 trillion in tax cuts on top of that, including a 25 percent tax cut for every millionaire in the country.

AUDIENCE:  Booo --

THE PRESIDENT:  Now, you may be wondering -- because I can tell -- (laughter) -- you’re scratching your head here -- you may be wondering how do they spend $5 trillion on new tax cuts and still keep a straight face when they say that their plan would reduce our deficit?  This is a good question.  (Laughter.)  Well, they say that they’ll start by proposing $1 trillion in cuts to things like education and training --

AUDIENCE: No!

THE PRESIDENT:  -- and medical research and clean energy.  But that's only $1 trillion.  They’ve got $5 trillion that they want to pay for, right?  So that’s not enough.  So they also propose eliminating health care for about 50 million Americans and turning Medicare into a voucher program. 

AUDIENCE:  Booo --

THE PRESIDENT:  But that’s still not enough.  Still haven’t gotten to the $5 trillion yet.  So then they’ll also have to raise taxes on the middle class by taking away tax benefits for everything from health care to college to retirement to home ownership, and this could cost some families thousands of dollars. 

So think about this.  To pay for another $250,000 tax cut for the average millionaire, they’re going to ask you to foot the bill. 

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  We can’t afford it!

THE PRESIDENT:  I figure you can’t afford it.  (Laughter and applause.)   Is there anybody here who can afford to pay thousands of dollars to give folks like Mr. Romney or me another tax cut?

AUDIENCE:  No!

THE PRESIDENT:  Unfortunately, that is their entire economic plan.  That’s it.  When Mr. Romney tells us he’s some sort of financial wizard who can fix our economy, that’s exactly how he intends to do it. 

Now, there may be some people -- in fact, I know there are some people -- who think this kind of plan is a good idea.  They want to give the policies of the last decade another try.  And if they do, they should vote for Mr. Romney.  They should reelect the Republicans who’ve been running Congress.  Together, they will take America back down this path that we tried. 

I believe they’re wrong.  I believe their policies were tested, and they failed.  (Applause.)  And that -- my belief is not just based on some knee-jerk partisan reaction.  It’s based on the fact that we tried it.  And you look at our economic history.  In this country, prosperity has never come from the top down.  It comes from a strong and growing middle class.  (Applause.)  It comes from successful, thriving small businesses. (Applause.) 

We don’t need more top-down economics.  (Applause.)  What we need is a better plan for education and training -- (applause) -- and energy independence and infrastructure and innovation that rebuilds America.  What we need is a tax code that encourages companies to create jobs and manufacturing here in the United States -- (applause) -- and that asks the wealthiest Americans to pay a little bit more to help pay down our deficit.  (Applause.)  
Listen, we don’t expect government to solve all our problems, and it shouldn’t try to solve all our problems.  I learned from my mom no education policy can take the place of a parent’s love and attention -- and sometimes scolding.  (Laughter.)  As a young man, I worked with a group of Catholic churches who taught me that no poverty program can make as much of a difference as the kindness and commitment and involvement of caring neighbors and friends and fellow parishioners.  (Applause.) 

Over the last three years, I cut taxes for the typical working family by $3,600.  (Applause.)  I cut taxes for small businesses 18 times.  (Applause.)  I don’t believe every regulation is smart, or that every tax dollar is spent wisely.  I don’t believe we should be in the business of helping people who refuse to help themselves.  (Applause.)  But let me tell you what I do believe. 

I share the belief of our first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln, that through government, we should do together what we cannot do as well for ourselves.  (Applause.)

And that’s how we built this country –- together.  We built railroads and highways, and the Hoover Dam and the Golden Gate Bridge.  We did that together.  We did big things together.  We sent my grandfather’s generation to college on the GI Bill.  We did that together.   (Applause.) 

We invented amazing scientific technologies and medical breakthroughs because we invested in basic research and science. We did those things together.  We didn’t do those things for any particular individual, any particular group, but we understood that by making these common investments, everybody would have the platform, everybody would have the capacity to do better.  It would make us all richer -- together.  It gave all of us opportunity -- together.  (Applause.)  

We moved forward together, as one nation and as one people. And that is the right lesson for our future.  That's why I’m running for a second term as President of the United States -- because I want us all to move forward together.  (Applause.)

AUDIENCE:  Four more years!  Four more years!  Four more years!

THE PRESIDENT:  I’m running to make sure that every American has a chance to get the skills and training that today’s jobs require.  My plan would recruit an army of new teachers, pay those teachers better.  (Applause.)  I want to hire more teachers in areas like math and science.  I want to give 2 million more Americans the chance to go to community colleges and learn the skills that local businesses are looking for right now.  (Applause.)  And I want to make higher education affordable for every American who’s willing to work for it –- not just by offering more loans and financial aid, but by holding down the costs of a college tuition.  (Applause.)

A college education can't be a luxury.  It’s a vital necessity for everybody.  It may not be a four-year college; it may be a two-year college, it may be a technical school.  But everybody is going to need the skills they need to compete.  And that's the choice in this election.  That's why I’m running for President.  (Applause.)

Now, I’m running so that we have a future where we control our own energy, and that's good for our economy, our security.  It’s good for our environment.  (Applause.)  So my plan would end government subsidies to oil companies that are making plenty of profits.  Let’s double down on clean energy -- (applause) -- wind power and solar power, next generation of biofuels, fuel-efficient cars.  That’s the choice in this election.

I’m running to make sure that the United States of America is the best place on Earth for innovation and discovery, which is why my plan would give companies a permanent tax credit for research and development that they do here in America, and we double down on the public research that's helped lay the foundation for the Internet and GPS and Google, and the countless companies and jobs that follow.

I’m running so that after a decade of war, we can start doing some nation-building here at home.  (Applause.)  So we've ended the war in Iraq.  We are transitioning in Afghanistan.  My plan would take half the money we’re no longer spending on war, use it to put people back to work rebuilding our roads and our runways and our ports and our wireless networks.  (Applause.)  That’s the choice in this election. 

I’m running so that we can reduce our deficit in a responsible way, by $4 trillion, doing it in a balanced, responsible way --

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  The way it was done before.

THE PRESIDENT:  The way it was done before.  (Applause.)  I put forward a detailed plan.  It will cut spending we can’t afford.  And there's some programs that don't work -- we can eliminate that money -- strengthen programs like Medicare for the long haul, reform our tax code so that the wealthiest Americans pay a little bit more, just like they did when Bill Clinton was President -- (applause) -- just like they did when our economy created 23 million new jobs.  (Applause.)

I mean, think about it, we created 23 million new jobs, the biggest budget surplus in history -- and, by the way, we produced a lot of millionaires, too.  There’s no contradiction here.  And there are plenty of patriotic, successful Americans, a lot of business leaders, a lot of folks who’d be willing to make this contribution again if they were asked to help pay down the deficit and they saw it as part of a responsible, balanced plan.

This is about choices.  I don’t believe that giving millionaires and billionaires a $250,000 tax cut is going to do more for our future than hiring transformative teachers, or providing financial aid to the children of middle-class families. (Applause.)  I don’t believe a poorly designed tax cut like that is more likely to create jobs than providing loans to new entrepreneurs, or tax credits to small businesses who hire veterans.  I don’t think it’s more likely to spur economic growth than investments in clean energy and medical research, and new roads and bridges and runways.

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Eldercare.

THE PRESIDENT:  Or eldercare. 

So Governor Romney, he fundamentally disagrees with my vision.  That’s what elections are about.  His allies in Congress disagree with my vision.  Neither of them will endorse any policy that asks the wealthiest Americans to pay even a nickel more in taxes. 

AUDIENCE:  Booo--

THE PRESIDENT:  That’s the reason we haven’t reached an agreement on our deficit.  It’s the reason my jobs bill that would put more than 1 million people back to work has been voted down by Republicans in the Congress again and again and again.  It’s been the biggest source of gridlock in Washington for the last three years. 

And, New Hampshire, the only thing that can break this stalemate is you.  (Applause.)  Is you.  In this election, on every single challenge that we face, you’ve got the final say.  That’s the amazing thing about our democracy. 

You can decide whether we keep our brave men and women in Afghanistan indefinitely, like Mr. Romney wants to do, or whether we stick to the timeline that I’ve set to finally bring our troops home.  That’s up to you.  (Applause.) 

You can decide that instead of restricting access to birth control or defunding Planned Parenthood, we should make sure that in this country, women control their own health care choices.  That’s up to you.  (Applause.) 

You can decide whether we keep Wall Street reform; whether ending taxpayer bailouts for Wall Street banks was the right thing to do; whether preventing insurance companies from discriminating against people who are sick is the right thing to do; whether over 3 million young people being able to stay on their parent’s health insurance plan is the right thing to do.  (Applause.)  

You can decide whether or not we go back to the days when you could be kicked out of the United States military just because of who you are and who you love.  (Applause.)  You can decide whether or not it’s time to stop denying citizenship to responsible young people just because they’re the children of undocumented workers -- (applause) -- who have been growing up with our kids and want to contribute to this country. 

It’s going to be up to you whether we continue seeing these elections where multimillion-dollar donations, one person writing a $10 million check -- whether that speaks louder than the voices of ordinary citizens.  It’s all up to you.  (Applause.)  

This is going to be a close election.  And from now until November, the other side will spend more money than at any time in American history.  And almost all of it will be on ads that tell you the economy is bad -- it's all Obama's fault.  He can't fix it because he thinks government is always the answer; because he doesn’t have the experience of making a lot of money in the private sector; or because he is in over his head; or because he thinks everything is just fine.  (Laughter.) 

That’s what the scary voices in the ads will tell you over and over and over again.  That’s what Mitt Romney will say.  That’s what the Republicans in Congress will say.  And I give them credit -- they have a lot of message discipline.  They just repeat over and over and over again the same thing.  (Laughter.) Doesn’t matter if it's true, they'll just keep on repeating.  That's what they do.   

But you know what, that may be a plan to win the election; it’s sure not a plan to create jobs.  It’s not a plan to grow the economy.  It’s not a plan to pay down our debt.  It's not a plan to revive the middle class and restore the American Dream. 

So, Durham, if you believe we need a plan for education and energy, for infrastructure and innovation; if you believe that our economy grows best when everybody has a fair shot and everybody is doing their fair share, and everybody is playing by the same set of rules -- (applause) -- then I'm going to need you to stand with me as I run for a second term as President.  (Applause.)  I'm going to need you.  The country is going to need you.  (Applause.) 

And here in New Hampshire, I know you guys have a tradition -- a lot of independents out here.  Listen, I'm asking you -- vote for anybody else -- Democrat, independent, Republican -- anybody who shares your views about how this country should move forward.  I will work with anyone of any party who believes that we are in this together, that we rise or fall as one nation, and as one people.  (Applause.)  

It's fashionable right now for people to be cynical.  We go in cycles like this, and right now a lot of people are saying, oh, America is doing terribly and this and that, and what are we going to do.  Let me tell you something.  There's no problem out there, no challenge we face, that we do not have the capacity to solve.  (Applause.)  We are Americans, and we are tougher than whatever tough times may bring us.  And what’s lacking right now is our politics.  What's lacking right now is that some of the worst impulses in our politics have been rewarded.  And that’s something entirely within your power to solve.

And in 2008, we made a commitment to each other.  We said, together, he can bring about change -- even against opposition, even against all kinds of nonsense going on in the campaigns.  What we saw, what we witnessed, was that when Americans, as citizens, come together nothing can stop them. 

And I made a commitment to you.  I said, you know what, I'm not going to be a perfect President.  I'm not a perfect man -- Michelle can tell you that.  (Laughter.)  But you know what I did say?  I said -- some of you may remember this -- I said I will always tell you where I stand, I will always tell you what I think, what I believe.  And I will wake up every single day, fighting as hard as I can for you -- (applause)-- fighting as hard as I know how for American families who are out there working hard, who are out there striving, who are doing what they're supposed to be doing.  (Applause.) 

And you know what, New Hampshire, I've kept that promise, because I still believe in you.  I believe in the American people.  (Applause.)  And I need you to keep believing in me.  I need you to hit some doors and make some phone calls and register your friends.  Talk to your neighbors.  Get on Facebook.  Get on Twitter.  (Applause.)  Let's get to work.  Let's finish what we started.  Let's remind the world how a strong economy is built, and remind them why America is the greatest nation on Earth. 

Thank you, everybody.  God bless you.  God bless America. 

END  
3:05 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Letter--Designation of the Chair of the United States International Trade Commission

TEXT OF A LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT TO THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE

June 25, 2012

Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:)

Consistent with the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1330(c)(1), this is to notify the Congress that I have designated Irving A. Williamson as Chair of the United States International Trade Commission for the term expiring June 16, 2014.

Sincerely,

BARACK OBAMA

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Readout of the President’s Call with Greek Prime Minister Samaras

President Obama spoke with Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras earlier today.  The President congratulated Prime Minister Samaras on his election and on the formation of his coalition government.  President Obama expressed his strong support for Greece and noted the continued solidarity between the American and Greek people.  The President welcomed Prime Minister Samaras’ commitment to address Greece’s economic situation and urged the Prime Minister to work closely with the European Union, the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank in the implementation of Greece’s reform program.  The President also wished the Prime Minister a speedy recovery as he recuperates from his recent eye surgery.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney en route New Hampshire, 6/25/12

Aboard Air Force One
En Route New Hampshire   

1:03 P.M. EDT

MR. CARNEY:  Well, welcome aboard Air Force One as we make our way to New Hampshire on this two-day trip.  I have no announcements to make at the top.  I will say that I'm sure you've all seen the President's statement about the Supreme Court decision regarding the Arizona law.  But with that, I will take your questions.

Q    Republicans are trying to frame this as some sort of failure of there not being an overall comprehensive immigration passage these past two years.  Your response?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, I'd say a couple of things.  One, as the President has noted, there used to be very prominent Republicans who were advocates for comprehensive immigration reform, as this President is.  That included his opponent in the 2008 election, John McCain, who helped craft legislation for comprehensive immigration reform.  It included his predecessor, President George W. Bush, who had a longstanding commitment to immigration reform.  Unfortunately, what we've seen is a retreat by leaders of the Republican Party in these past several years from a position of advocating comprehensive immigration reform. 

What we saw during the Republican primaries -- and I think the statement that you're quoting I assume is in reference in part to former Governor Romney's statement -- was an embrace of the Arizona law as a model for the nation, a position that hardly suggests a desire for comprehensive bipartisan immigration reform. 

The President disagrees with that position as well.  So this President's commitment to immigration reform is strong.  His commitment to border security is strong and has been demonstrated by his record.  And he believes that we need to take steps to provide the kind of comprehensive immigration reform that Republicans have resisted.  Congress needs to act.  And he looks forward to working with Congress when leaders of the Republican Party are ready to do so.

Q    Can I take you to a couple of points in the statement? One of the paragraphs says, "must ensure that Arizona law enforcement officials do not enforce this law in a manner that undermines the civil rights of Americans."  And then later, "use every federal resource to protect the safety and civil rights of every American."  Can you expand on that a little bit?  What are you talking about doing?  What are you getting at there?

MR. CARNEY:  Obviously we're committed to the protection of the civil rights of the American people.  And while the President is pleased with the decision by the Supreme Court to strike down much of the Arizona law, we remain concerned about how Section 2 would be implemented, and concerned about the impact it might have on -- depending on how it's implemented -- the impact implementation could have on civil rights.  But I don't have a specific -- a hypothetical to provide to you about how that could play out.

Q    What resources -- what federal resources?  Could you give us an example?

MR. CARNEY:  I'd refer you to the Department of Justice, but obviously the Justice Department is committed to upholding civil rights of the American people.

Q    Is there a concern that this ruling could open the door for other states to pass similar stop and detain --

MR. CARNEY:  This goes back to the first question, which relates to comprehensive immigration reform.  Our position is that, as the President said, that we need comprehensive immigration reform because we need to address the broken immigration system at the earliest opportunity possible because a patchwork of state laws only creates more problems than it solves.  And that has been the President’s position all along.

Q    Does the White House believe, though, that you can ensure the civil rights of folks administratively?  Or do you think that you need legislation to do that?

MR. CARNEY:  To ensure rights that are existing in the law?

Q    Just following up on his question --

MR. CARNEY:  That's a very -- there is not really a question there.  Obviously, the Department of Justice is committed to preserving and protecting the civil rights of American citizens.

Q    That's not what I'm asking.  I'm just trying to ping off his question, which is he was asking what steps are you guys going to take --

MR. CARNEY:  I have no announcements to make about steps.  I wouldn't necessarily anticipate steps.  The President expressed our concerns about how -- about the practical impact of Section 2 of Arizona's statute, which requires local law enforcement officials to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect to be here illegally.

Going forward, we must ensure that Arizona law enforcement officials do not implement Section 2 in a manner that undermines the civil rights of Americans.  We are heartened that the Court recognized that detaining individuals solely to verify their immigration status would raise constitutional concerns.

Q    Jay, looking at the Egyptian election, there are some Republicans, Allen West being one of them, who are basically saying that this is -- the result of it, that the Muslim Brotherhood candidate got elected show that the Arab Spring was sort of a debacle.  What is the --

MR. CARNEY:  Who said that?  I’m sorry.

Q    Allen West.  And other Republicans have criticized because -- and are concerned that Muslim Brotherhood candidates are getting elected or are getting more momentum.  What is your reaction to that, and to the characterization that the Arab Spring -- that the President has handled the Arab Spring -- should have been more aggressive in some ways?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, I’m not sure what that means, to be more aggressive.  I mean, specificity is required here.  The fact is, we congratulate President-elect Morsi on his victory in Egypt’s presidential election, and we congratulate the Egyptian people for this milestone in their transition to democracy. 

We look forward to working together with President-elect Morsi, and the government he forms to advance the many shared interests between Egypt and the United States.  We hope that President-elect Morsi will take steps to advance the national unity, uphold universal values, and respect the rights of all Egyptian citizens, including women and religious minorities such as Coptic Christians. 

With regard to your question and the assertions that you’re referring to, which I have not heard, but are similar to ones we’ve heard in the past, we judge individuals and parties that are elected in a democratic process by their actions, not by their religious affiliations.  And I would point you to the comments that President-elect Morsi made, the commitments he made to upholding civil rights, including of women and Coptic Christians -- principles that we very much think are important.

But again, our commitment to the revolution that began in Egypt is to a process that provides for a transition to democracy that is transparent.  And we congratulate the Egyptian people on this milestone as part of that process.

Q    Is there any concern, though, that the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood could set back relations between Egypt and Israel? 

MR. CARNEY:  Again, I would point you to what I said about judging individuals and parties on their actions once in office rather than their religious affiliations.  And I would simply note that in his address to the Egyptian people Sunday, President-elect Morsi acknowledged that Egypt would continue to uphold its treaty obligations -- a treaty that is, of course, of great importance is the one that it has with Israel.  We believe it is essential for the Egyptian government to continue to fill Egypt’s role as a pillar of regional peace, security and stability.  And we will continue to emphasize this message with the new government and structure our engagement accordingly.

Q    On the same lines, is there any concern about reports that he may want to restore ties with Iran?

MR. CARNEY:  I would say two things about that.  We look forward to discussing a range of issues, including our regional security concerns, with the new government.  We believe it is essential for the Egyptian government to continue to fulfill Egypt's role as a pillar of regional peace, security and stability.

Now, it is perfectly appropriate for a nation like Egypt to have relations with its neighbors.  But again, we look to Egypt to continue its significant role as a pillar of regional peace and stability.

Q    Would it be appropriate to restore ties with Iran?  Is that something the U.S. would be comfortable with?

MR. CARNEY:  Again, it's appropriate for a nation like Egypt to have relations with other nations in the region.  The issue that I think we're focused on is that Egypt continue to fulfill its role as a pillar of regional security and peace and stability.

Q    Can we stay in the region and go to Syria and Turkey?  The Turks are talking about discussing with NATO a response to the downing of the Turkish warplane.  Does that warrant -- given it appears that it was intentional -- does that warrant retaliation by Turkey, including military retaliation?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, we are in close contact with Turkish officials as they investigate Syria's shooting down of the Turkish Federal-4 fighter jet on June 22nd to determine Turkey's response.  We stand in solitary with Turkey, a key U.S. ally as you know, and look forward to its presentation tomorrow at the North Atlantic Council.  We will work with Turkey, and other partners, to hold the Assad regime accountable.

Q    So what is their appropriate response?

MR. CARNEY:  Again, we're working with the Turks.  We look forward to their presentation tomorrow at the NAC. 

Q    Do you have a preference for a diplomatic solution -- do -- I presume you have a preference for a diplomatic solution.

MR. CARNEY:  Yes, I think that -- but I'm not going to characterize the outcome of a presentation the Turks will make.  We obviously support the Turks and we'll work with them.  Turkey is a key ally of the United States, member of NATO. 

Q    One on Egypt.  Are you confident that there will be an effective transition between the President-elect and the military leadership?  And can you also explain why the President also called Mr. Shafiq, as well?

MR. CARNEY:  Certainly.

Q    What was that last part?

Q    Why did he also call Shafiq.

MR. CARNEY:  I would be happy to do that.  I would say that, first off, on the call to General Shafiq, the President encouraged him to support the democratic process and work to unify the Egyptian people, which I think goes to your first question, which is that our message to the staff has been consistent throughout the transition.  The military should complete the transition to a democratically-elected government.  The presidential election was a very important step on that path, and we have commended the staff and the Presidential Election Commission for their roles in facilitating the election.  But it is our position, as it has been, that the process of transition to democracy needs to continue.

Q    Jay, just on domestic policy, are you confident that Congress will be able to reach a deal on the student loan issue, and also highway spending?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, it's a good question.  We firmly believe that Congress should finish the job and pass legislation that will ensure interest rates for 7.3 million or 7.4 million students do not double on the first of next month.  They have very few days left to get that done.  Senator Reid has put forward a proposal that we believe -- that we support. 

And again, this is an issue that Republicans at first said wasn't an issue; they called it a phony issue.  Others said that it was a distraction from the economy -- as if education were not an economic issue.  There's one reason why Republicans are talking about this today -- it's because the President heightened awareness of it, went around the country talking about it, and has placed pressure on Congress to act.  We remain confident that Congress will do that, and that student loan rates will not double.  But there is certainly concern that only a few days remain before those loan rates double. 

Q    Can you give us a sense of the President's thinking in anticipation of the health care ruling this week?  And what do you make of some of the backseat driving I guess in the press over the weekend about the strategy before the Court?

MR. CARNEY:  In terms of anticipating the Supreme Court decision, I can say only what I've said before, which is that the President and his team remain confident that the Affordable Care Act is constitutional, and the administration has pressed forward with implementing the various aspects of the Affordable Care Act, and will continue to do so.

As for the question about legal strategy, I would simply say that while I sometimes try to sound like one, I'm not a lawyer, and I can't dissect each argument.  But I can say that we have confidence in the Justice Department and the Solicitor General and we are confident that the law is constitutional.  And while I think that it's important to note that while some in Washington are changing what they have to say about this law and the arguments presented, legal experts continue to believe this law is constitutional.  I can point you to a number of references.

On June 22nd, Neil Siegel from the Duke University Law School, said, "In at least two independently sufficient ways, the minimum coverage provision encounters no constitutional impediments sounding in federalism." 

On May 23rd, again, not long ago, Lawrence Gostin, from Georgetown University, said the law was, "unquestionably constitutional." 

On April 16th, Henry Paul Monaghan at Columbia Law School, said, "The individual health mandate surely passes constitutional muster under settled judicial principles."

We continue to agree with legal experts across the spectrum who believe this law is constitutional.

Q    Anything in terms of preparation for a ruling or --

MR. CARNEY:  We remain confident that the Affordable Care Act is constitutional and we are ready for whatever decision is rendered by the Supreme Court.

Q    Is it a disappointment that the Court didn’t reconsider Citizens United?

MR. CARNEY:  I haven't had that discussion with the President or others.  You know the President's position and our position on Citizens United.  I think the far-ranging implications of that regrettable decision have been seen already, week after week.  But I haven't got a specific reaction to the Montana case that you're referring to.

Q    Does the White House think -- the Democratic votes in the potential vote against Attorney General Holder for contempt?

MR. CARNEY:  I don't have an answer to that question.  I can simply say that, as I said last week, the Department of Justice, the Attorney General have provided an enormous number of documents in response to the legitimate oversight interest of the Congress and the House committee in question here.  The Attorney General himself testified repeatedly about this matter.  All the documents that fall under the assertion of executive privilege date after the February 4th date beyond which these documents are simply the kind of internal deliberative documents that every administration needs to be able to keep private in order to allow for a functioning executive branch as it deliberates over how to respond to congressional inquiries and media inquiries. 

Q    Is it a hard line in the sand, no executive privilege, exercising that right?

MR. CARNEY:  I'm sorry, say that again?

Q    Is it a hard line in the sand, or is it the beginning of negotiations, like we saw in the U.S. attorney scandal that -- they said executive privilege, and then you had an offering of testimony, you had offerings of --

MR. CARNEY:  We've been clear that we remain -- the Attorney General met with the chairman of the committee and attempted to resolve this issue.  I would refer you to the Justice Department for details, but we remain ready to try to resolve this issue in a way that's satisfactory to both sides.

I would note what the chairman himself said, in conflict with the Speaker of the House.  The chairman said over the weekend that there is no evidence -- let me repeat -- no evidence of White House involvement in any cover-up or attempt to cover up this issue. 

And I would point you to Republicans in the House who have agreed with us in calling this action political.  It's clearly political.  It's clearly not what the American people want their Congress to be focusing on at a time when they should be taking action to help the economy grow, to help us create jobs.  They should be dealing with the student loan issue.  They should be dealing with the transportation bill.  They should be taking up the many provisions the President has put forward that economists have said would put people to work now.  We hope the Congress does that. 

Q    Would you provide any kind of -- is there any chance of us, on camera -- showing the documents --

MR. CARNEY:  I would refer you to -- as the chairman himself made clear, this is not an issue -- this is an issue that the Department of Justice should address.  It's not for the White House to address.  The Attorney General, the Department of Justice have been enormously cooperative -- provided 7,600 pages of documents, countless hours of testimony.  And I know that they have endeavored to try to resolved this issue. 

Q    Do you expect the President will talk about the immigration ruling today in his remarks in New Hampshire?

MR. CARNEY:  I don't have a preview for you.

Okay?  Thanks. 

END 
1:23 P.M. EDT