The White House

Office of the Vice President

OP-ED by Vice President Joe Biden in Today's Wall Street Journal

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
The President's Nuclear Vision
We Will Spend What is Necessary to Maintain the Safety, Security and Effectiveness of Our Weapons

By JOE BIDEN
January 29, 2010

The United States faces no greater threat than the spread of nuclear weapons. That is why, last April in Prague, President Obama laid out a comprehensive agenda to reverse their spread, and to pursue the peace and security of a world without them. He understands that this ultimate goal will not be reached quickly. But by acting on a number of fronts, we can ensure our security, strengthen the global nonproliferation regime, and keep vulnerable nuclear material out of terrorist hands.

For as long as nuclear weapons are required to defend our country and our allies, we will maintain a safe, secure and effective nuclear arsenal. The president's Prague vision is central to this administration's efforts to protect the American people—and that is why we are increasing investments in our nuclear arsenal and infrastructure in this year's budget and beyond.

Among the many challenges our administration inherited was the slow but steady decline in support for our nuclear stockpile and infrastructure, and for our highly trained nuclear work force. The stockpile, infrastructure and work force played a critical and evolving role in every stage of our nuclear experience, from the Manhattan Project to the present day. Once charged with developing ever more powerful weapons, they have had a new mission in the 18 years since we stopped conducting nuclear tests. That is to maintain the strength of the nuclear arsenal.

For almost a decade, our laboratories and facilities have been underfunded and undervalued. The consequences of this neglect—like the growing shortage of skilled nuclear scientists and engineers and the aging of critical facilities—have largely escaped public notice. Last year, the Strategic Posture Commission led by former Defense Secretaries William Perry and James Schlesinger warned that our nuclear complex requires urgent attention. We agree.

The budget we will submit to Congress on Monday both reverses this decline and enables us to implement the president's nuclear-security agenda. These goals are intertwined. The same skilled nuclear experts who maintain our arsenal play a key role in guaranteeing our country's security now and for the future. State-of-the art facilities, and highly trained and motivated people, allow us to maintain our arsenal without testing. They will help meet the president's goal of securing vulnerable nuclear materials world-wide in the coming years, and enable us to track and thwart nuclear trafficking, verify weapons reductions, and to develop tomorrow's cutting-edge technologies for our security and prosperity.

To achieve these goals, our budget devotes $7 billion for maintaining our nuclear-weapons stockpile and complex, and for related efforts. This commitment is $600 million more than Congress approved last year. And over the next five years we intend to boost funding for these important activities by more than $5 billion. Even in a time of tough budget decisions, these are investments we must make for our security. We are committed to working with Congress to ensure these budget increases are approved.

This investment is long overdue. It will strengthen our ability to recruit, train and retain the skilled people we need to maintain our nuclear capabilities. It will support the work of our nuclear labs, a national treasure that we must and will sustain. Many of our facilities date back to World War II, and, given the safety and environmental challenges they present, cannot be sustained much longer. Increased funding now will eventually enable considerable savings on both security and maintenance. It also will allow us to clean up and close down production facilities we no longer need.

Our budget request is just one of several closely related and equally important initiatives giving life to the president's Prague agenda. Others include completing the New START agreement with Russia, releasing the Nuclear Posture Review on March 1, holding the Nuclear Security Summit in April, and pursuing ratification and entry into force of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

We will by these initiatives seek to strengthen an emerging bipartisan consensus on how best to secure our nation. These steps will strengthen the nonproliferation regime, which is vital to holding nations like North Korea and Iran accountable when they break the rules, and deterring others from trying to do so.

Reflecting this consensus, Sen. John McCain has joined the president in endorsing a world without nuclear weapons—a goal that was articulated by President Ronald Reagan, who in 1984 said these weapons must be "banished from the face of the Earth." This consensus was inspired by four of our most eminent statesmen—Messrs. Henry Kissinger, William Perry, Sam Nunn and George P. Shultz.

Some critics will argue that we should not constrain our nuclear efforts in any way. Others will assert that retaining a robust deterrent is at odds with our nonproliferation agenda. These four leaders last week in these pages argued compellingly that "maintaining high confidence in our nuclear arsenal is critical as the numbers of these weapons goes down. It is also consistent with and necessary for U.S. leadership in nonproliferation, risk reduction and arms reduction goals."

This shared commitment serves our security. No nation can secure itself by disarming unilaterally, but as long as nuclear weapons exist, all nations remain ever on the brink of destruction. As President Obama said in Prague, "We cannot succeed in this endeavor alone, but we can lead it, we can start it."

Mr. Biden is vice president of the United States.

Creating New Jobs by Investing in High-Speed Rail

January 28, 2010 | 1:21:24 | Public Domain

President Obama, joined by Vice President Biden, announces $8 billion in Recovery Act funding for high-speed rail projects that will provide faster, more energy-efficient travel between cities and create new jobs for American workers. The announcement came during a Town Hall meeting in Tampa, FL.

Download mp4 (640MB) | mp3 (75MB)

Read the Transcript

Remarks by the President and the Vice President at Town Hall Meeting in Tampa, Florida

1:14 P.M. EST

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Thank you all very, very much.  Thank you all very much.  It's amazing the crowds I draw.  (Laughter.)  It's great to be with you all today.  And I really hope you all got to hear the President's speech last night.  (Applause.)  Wasn't it good?  I think the President laid out with clarity and power what we've done, what we're going to do, and how we're committed to getting it done.  (Applause.)

He laid out a clear and ambitious plan -- a plan that flows from our core principles, the principles we ran on, our core mission that we said we were going to attend to when we took office a year ago.  And that was very simple:  to restore the middle class in America.  (Applause.)

Look, because of the President's bold leadership, we weathered the most ferocious economic storm this nation has seen since the Great Depression, keeping us from sliding into a depression, as some leading economists suggested.  The President from the outset has understood that it's all about jobs, but there's a lot of business to attend to just to keep us from sliding off the edge. 

Well, ladies and gentlemen, the President knows one other thing.  In a sense, it's more than about jobs.  A job is more than a paycheck.  It's about dignity and it's about respect.  And too many people have lost it.  (Applause.) 

Ladies and gentlemen, President Obama understands that the longest walk a mother or father can make is a trip up a short flight of stairs to their child's bedroom to say, "Honey, I'm sorry, you're not going to be able to stay at Stewart Middle School next year, or you can't play on West Tampa's Little League team next year, honey.  We're going to have to move because daddy or mommy lost their job, or because the bank said we can't keep our house." 

My dad made that walk when I was a kid in our home in Scranton, Pennsylvania.  I remember vividly my father walking up the stairs and I sitting on the end of the bed with my sister, Valerie, the only one old enough to understand what he was talking about.  He said, "I'm sorry, honey, but I'm going to have to move."

The first thought I had was, God, they're getting divorced -- literally.  That's what worried me.  He said, "I've got to move, honey.  You and Val are going to stay here with Mom and Jimmy and you're going to stay here with Grandpa, because Dad has to move to Delaware.  I'll be back.  It will take about a year, but I'll come back and forth.  But we're going to be okay."

Wasn't until I got older I realized how hard that must have been for my father to make that walk; how hard it must have been for him to go into the kitchen before that walk and say to his father-in-law, "Ambrose, can you do me a favor?  Can you keep my family?  Can Jean and the kids stay here with you?  I'll try to do it as quick as I can.  But there's no jobs."

Ladies and gentlemen, too many Floridians have had to make that walk over the last two years.  And the President and I understand.  We understand.  And we're determined to make sure that every hardworking Floridian, every hardworking American, is able to walk into his child's room and say, "Honey, it's going to be okay."  (Applause.)  That's what this is all about.  That's what this is all about.

As you heard last night, that's why we're putting in place the policies that will enable us to reduce the debt we inherited and deal with the spending required to keep us from falling off the cliff this year.  And during the process, you heard him say how we are reordering our country's priorities.  We're investing in health care, education, energy information, technology, health technology -- (applause) -- electric vehicles and batteries, investments that will help us build a new economy for the 21st century -- investments that will allow us to lead in the 21st century as we did in the 20th.

Ladies and gentlemen, we're determined to restore America to its rightful place at the leading edge of innovation, with bold ideas that will create jobs immediately and serve as the foundation, a new platform -- (applause) -- a new platform to build this economy on that will serve not just our immediate needs but future generations; ideas like wind power, solar energy, a smart grid, broadband -- (applause) -- and high-speed rail.  And that's why we're here today.  (Applause.)

Having made over 7,900 round trips, literally, on Amtrak, 250 miles a day, I am very familiar with rail.  (Laughter.)  And today you have no idea how pleased I am to talk about the announcement that we made yesterday awarding -- in total, nationwide -- nearly $8 billion from the Recovery Act, funding to move us in the direction of developing a high-speed rail service in 13 travel corridors covering 31 states all across this country.  (Applause.)

Ladies and gentlemen, these investments -- these investments have several goals:  first, to improve existing rail lines to make train service faster, more reliable; two, to pull cars off the road, reducing congestion, cutting pollution, and increasing productivity; and three, to begin to develop new corridors for high-speed trains that will go from 169 to 230 miles an hour.  (Applause.)

Ladies and gentlemen, like a corridor, right here from Tampa to Orlando -- (applause) -- so you'll be able to get on a train here to Orlando in less than an hour, without battling traffic and congestion, arrive at your destination.  Ladies and gentlemen, this single investment is not going to solve all our transportation issues overnight.  Instead, with more than $55 billion of proposals from 50 states all across the country, we're providing $8 billion in seed money.  And today's awards provide only initial funding for the rail system.  Like Tampa and Orlando route, more funding is going to come in the future as progress is made.

We have committed to another $5 billion in funding over the next five years.  It's a down payment on a truly national program that's going to reshape the way we travel.  It will change the way which we go from place to place, change the ways we work and live, and will connect communities to each other in a way that in the past was impossible.  Just like the Interstate Highway structure did back in the mid-'50s, it will have far-reaching consequences.

Let me ask you a question:  How can we, the leading nation in the world, be in a position where China, Spain, France -- and name all the other countries who have rail systems that are far superior to ours?

Ladies and gentlemen, it's about time we move.  But this time -- but this time, we're not only going to be providing a better way to transport; we're going to be taking cars off of congested highways, reducing carbon emissions, and saving billions of dollars in human productivity lost just sitting in traffic jams, as studies point out.

Most important, we're creating jobs -- good jobs.  (Applause.)  Construction jobs.  Manufacturing jobs.  And we're going to be creating them right now.  We're going to spur economic development in the future and we're making our communities more livable all in the process. 

And ladies and gentlemen, it's now my pleasure to introduce the man who's leading us in this new era of adventure, the President of the United States of America.  (Applause.)  President Barack Obama.  (Applause.) 

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you, everybody.  Hello, Tampa!  (Applause.)  Thank you so much.  Thank you, everybody.  It's great to see you.  All right, everybody just make yourselves comfortable.  We're going to be here for a little bit.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Thank you.

We've got -- we've got some special guests that I want to make sure we acknowledge.  Florida CFO Alex Sink is in the house.  (Applause.)  Representative Kathy Castor, your representative.  (Applause.)  Representative Alan Grayson.  (Applause.)  Representative Kendrick Meek.  (Applause.)  Representative Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.  (Applause.)  Your own mayor, Pam Iorio.  (Applause.)  The mayor of Orlando, Buddy Dyer.  (Applause.)  The president of University of Tampa, Ronald Vaughn.  (Applause.) 

And two very special -- two very special guests, Brian C. Smithey and Roger J. Picard.  I want you guys to know who these folks are.  They are members of the FEMA Florida Task Force Team 2 Canine Search Specialists.  They went down to Haiti and worked 26-hour-long shifts, staying with victims until they were rescued.  The Florida Task Force Team saved seven lives.  Brian worked at a school where his dog, Powder, found a young adult female buried in the rubble three to four days.  So these are the kinds of heroes that make America proud, and I want everybody to give them a big round of applause.  Stand up.  Stand up.  (Applause.)  Thank you.

And I haven't spotted him in the crowd yet, but I've got to do this -- even though I know you all are upset that he took all that success to the Colts -- (applause) -- he made his name here in Tampa.  (Applause.)  And he's not just a great coach, but he's just a model individual and leader, we're very proud to have him in the house, Coach Tony Dungy.  (Applause.)

Any of you want some analysis about the upcoming Super Bowl, Coach is free to give -- no, I'm just -- it's good to see you, Coach.

All right.  Now, first of all let me say it's good to be back in the Sunshine State.  (Applause.)  It is especially good to be back in January.  (Laughter.)  And it's always nice to get out of Washington -- it is -- and spend a little time with the people who sent me to Washington.  (Applause.)

Now, last night I spoke with you about where we've been over the past year and where I believe we need to go.  And I said what all of you know from your own lives:  These are difficult times; these are challenging times for our country.

In the last two years, we've gone through the deepest recession since the Great Depression.  Think about that.  A big chunk of the people here -- certainly the younger people here -- have never even seen a recession; they don't even -- it doesn't register on their minds.  This is by far the toughest thing that the country has gone through economically since the 1930s.

And Tampa, like so many communities across our country, has felt the lash of shuttered businesses and lost jobs and home foreclosures and vanished or dwindling savings.  And this storm came at the end of what some call a lost decade -- because what happened between 2000 and now, it was a decade in which paychecks shrank and jobs barely grew, and the costs of everything from health care to college education went up.  Irresponsibility from Wall Street to Washington left good, responsible Americans who did everything right still struggling in ways they never imagined.

Joe and I took office in the middle of this raging storm.  We ran for office, the highest office, because we had been hearing stories like this day in, day out, for years, even before the financial crisis hit.  So we're not going to rest until we rebuild an economy in which hard work and responsibility are rewarded, and businesses are hiring again, and wages are growing again, and the middle class can get its legs underneath it again.  (Applause.)  We will not rest until we build an economy that's ready for America's future.

Now, to do that, the first thing we had to do was break the back of this recession.  And that required some tough, in some cases unpopular but unnecessary -- all which were necessary steps.  I mean -- I mentioned this last night -- none of us wanted to have to stabilize the banking sector, particularly since they helped create this mess.  (Applause.)  But, as I explained last night, if we hadn't, the financial system literally could have melted down and that would have taken our entire economy and millions more families and businesses with it.

But because of the steps we've taken, now the markets have stabilized.  The economy is growing again.  (Applause.)  The worst of the storm has passed.  But I think all of you understand the devastation remains.  One in 10 Americans still can't find work.  That's why creating jobs has to be our number one priority in 2010.  (Applause.) 

The true engines of job creation here in America are America's businesses.  And there are several steps we can take to help them expand and hire new workers.  Last night I proposed taking $30 billion of the money that went to Wall Street banks but have now been repaid and use it to help community banks give small businesses the credit they need to stay afloat.  (Applause.)  That will help.  I also proposed a new tax credit for more than 1 million small businesses that hire new workers or raise wages.  And while we're at it, I believe that we should eliminate all capital gains taxes on small business investment, and provide a tax incentive for all businesses to invest in new plants and equipment.  (Applause.)

As Joe mentioned, we're going to put more Americans to work rebuilding our infrastructure, and building our infrastructure of the future.  I mean, it's important to repave our roads; it's important to repair our bridges so that they're safe.  But we want to start looking deep into the 21st century -- (applause) -- and we want to say to ourselves, there is no reason why other countries can build high-speed rail lines and we can't.  (Applause.)  And that's what's about to happen right here in Tampa -- we are going to start building a new high-speed rail line -- (applause) -- right here in Tampa, building for the future, putting people to work.  (Applause.)

I'm excited.  I'm going to come back down here and ride it.  (Laughter and applause.)  Joe and I -- you all have a date.  When that thing is all set up, we'll come down here and check it out.  (Laughter.) 

And by the way, this high-speed rail line is being funded by the Recovery Act.  (Applause.)  And one other thing we can start doing for jobs here in America that I mentioned last night -- I talked about this all through the campaign.  We put this proposal in our budget, we keep on getting resistance, but we are going to keep on pushing to end tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas and give those tax breaks to companies that create jobs right here in the United States of America.  (Applause.)  It's the right thing to do.  It's the right thing to do.  It's the right thing to do.  (Applause.)

Now, I have to say this:  The steps that I just mentioned will help accelerate job growth in an economy that is already beginning to grow, but the steps we take alone won't make up for the 7 million jobs we lost over the last two years.  I mean, keep in mind, when we were sworn into office, that December we had lost 650,000 jobs.  January, as we were being sworn in, we lost 700,000 jobs; February, 650,000 jobs.  So before we could even put in place the Recovery Act, you had already seen millions of jobs lost.  That's a deep hole that we're going to have to fill.  And the only way to do that is to lay a new foundation for long-term economic growth and finally address the struggles that middle-class families have been grappling with for years.

Now, Florida, that's why Joe and I asked for the chance to serve as your President and Vice President.  (Applause.)  Look, we didn't seek this office to push our problems off or take the easy road through the next election.  We ran to solve problems -- problems that had been nagging at America for decades.  We want to solve them for the next generation.  We ran to get the tough stuff done.  (Applause.)  So as I mentioned last night, I make no apology for trying to fix stuff that's hard, because -- (applause) -- I'll be honest with you -- I'll be honest with you, Joe and I are both pretty smart politicians, we've been at this a while.  (Laughter.)  The easiest way to keep your poll numbers high is to say nothing and to do nothing that offends anybody.  (Applause.)  That's true.  No, no, no, you just wave, smile and -- (laughter.)  That's how you do it.

The minute you actually start doing something, somebody is going to disagree with you.  (Applause.)  But that's what I promised.  Some of you remember the campaign.  I said I wasn't just going to tell you what you want to hear, I was going to tell you what you need to hear.  (Applause.)  So none of this is new.  There's nothing that we have talked about since we entered the White House that we didn't talk about during the campaign.  And so long as we have the privilege of serving you, we will not stop fighting for your future, no matter how many lumps we've got to take to get it done.  (Applause.)

I do also have to just mention -- I'm going to mention -- you know I love you in the media, but I will mention this little aspect of our media.  Our friends with the pads and the pencils -- last week I went to Ohio and I started saying what I'm saying now, which is, I'm going to fight for your future.  And they got all worked up.  They got worked up last week.  They said, is he trying to change his message; is he trying to get more populist; is this a strategy that he's pursuing to boost this, that and the other; is this something new?

I just had to do a little rewind here of how we ran our grassroots campaign -- (applause) -- because I've got some news.  I've got some news of my own here.  I've been fighting for working folks my entire adult life.  (Applause.)  That's why I entered public service -- to fight for folks in Chicago.  That's why I ran for the state Senate.  That's why I ran for the U.S. Senate.  That's why I ran for President -- to fight for people here in Tampa, and people here in Florida, and to fight for people all across the United States of America.  (Applause.)

I seem to remember coming to Tampa two weeks before the election -- (applause) -- and you know what I said?  This is a quote, people can check -- I'm sure it was reported in the newspapers.  I said, "Change never comes without a fight."  (Applause.)  That was true then.  It's true now.  Change never comes without a fight, Florida.  So I won't stop fighting; I know you won't, either. 

We're not going to stop fighting to give our kids a world-class education, to make college more affordable, to make sure that by 2020 we have the highest rate of college attendance of any country in the world.  (Applause.)  So we proposed that graduates should only pay 10 percent of their income to pay back their student loans.  (Applause.)  Students like that.  (Applause.)  And what I've said is we'll forgive student loan debt after 20 years -- but after 10 if you choose a career in public service.  Because if you decide you want to be a teacher -- (applause) -- if you decide you want to be a cop, if you're not making huge amounts of money we don't want to discourage you from that because of the cost of college.  And by the way, I've been there and Michelle has been there -- it took us 10 full years to pay off Michelle's student loans, 15 to pay mine off.  (Laughter.)  So I've been there.  And our belief, and I think your belief, is in the United States of America nobody should go broke because they chose to go to college.  We want everybody to go to college, and we don't want them going broke doing it.  (Applause.)

We won't stop fighting to spark innovation and ignite a clean energy economy where America's workers are building solar panels and wind towers and cutting-edge batteries for automobiles -- because the nation that leads the clean energy revolution will be the nation that leads the global economy.  (Applause.)  And, as I said last night, other countries aren't waiting.  They want those jobs.  China wants those jobs.  Germany wants those jobs.  They are going after them hard, making the investments required.

We're not going to stop fighting to give every American a fair shake.  The first bill I signed into law was making sure that there was equal pay for equal work for women -- the Lilly Ledbetter Act -- (applause) -- because I think you should be paid the same for doing the same work.  That's just fair.  (Applause.)  And by the way, men, you should have been standing up clapping for that because -- (laughter) -- because most families today are depending on two paychecks, not one, to get by.  (Applause.)

We're not going to stop fighting to protect the American consumer.  That's why I signed a Credit Card Bill of Rights into law to protect you from surprise charges and retroactive rate hikes and other unfair rules.  That's why I'm fighting for a tough consumer financial protection agency to protect you against things like hidden fees that can make an ATM withdrawal cost 30 bucks.  (Applause.) 

I just want to be clear here, for the benefit of my friends in the back.  (Laughter.)  We need a strong financial sector.  Without it, businesses can't get capital to grow and create jobs.  Families can't finance a home loan or education.  So we want a healthy financial sector.  And there are folks all across the country working in banks who are doing great service to their community.  But we also need some rules of the road for Wall Street, so that reckless decisions made by a few don't take our economy over the side.  (Applause.)  That's common sense.  There's nothing radical about that.  In fact, the banks should want it because it would create greater stability in the system.

And, yes, we will not stop fighting for a health care system that works for the American people, not just for the insurance industry.  (Applause.)  We won't stop.  We want a system where you can't be denied care if you have a preexisting condition.  (Applause.)  You can't get thrown off your insurance right at the time when you get seriously ill.  We want a system where small businesses can get insurance at a price they can afford.  (Applause.)

Nobody pays more than small businesses and individuals who are self-employed in the insurance market, because they've got no leverage.  We want to change that by allowing them to be able to set up a pool.  We want to make sure that people who don't have coverage can find an affordable choice in a competitive marketplace.  (Applause.)  We want a system in which seniors don't have these huge gaps in their Medicare prescription drug coverage -- (applause) -- and where Medicare itself is on a sounder financial footing.  Those are the things that we're fighting for.

And I'm not going to stop on that, because it's the right thing to do, and by the way, if you are serious about reducing our deficit and debt you cannot accomplish it without reforming our health care system, because that's what's gobbling up more federal dollars than anything else.  (Applause.)  I don't understand folks who say they don't want to see government spending out of control, and then are fighting reforms that the Congressional Budget Office says would cut a trillion dollars off our deficit over the next two decades.  (Applause.)  Those aren't my numbers. 

Now, we're never going to stop fighting to cut waste and abuse in Washington.  We do have to rein in deficits that have been accumulating for too long.  Families across the country are tightening their belts and making tough decisions.  It's time for the federal government to do the same.  And that's why I proposed specific steps last night to bring the deficit down.  And I'm grateful that the Senate just passed, as we were flying down here to Florida, a rule called pay-as-you-go, or PAYGO, that was a big reason we had record surpluses in the 1990s instead of the record deficits that were handed to me when I ran -- walked into office.

Look, it's a very simply concept, this PAYGO.  It basically just says you got to pay as you go.  (Laughter.)  It's sort of how you live.  At least after you cut up those credit cards.  (Laughter.)  Basically, you want to start a new program?  Start a new program.  But you've got to end an old one that pays for it.  If you want to cut taxes, great, cut taxes.  But you've got to figure out how to fill the revenue that results when you lose that tax revenue.  So the idea is just honest accounting.  That's what's needed.

Let me say one more word about health care.  I just got to  -- I'm gnawing on this bone a little bit.  (Laughter.)  I know that the longer the process worked through on a complicated issue like this, the uglier it looked.  You know, there's -- and it doesn't help when you've got the insurance industry spending several hundred million dollars advertising against it, but -- but after a while, people didn't know what to think.  And you started asking yourselves, what's in it for me? 

And as I said last night, I take my share of the blame for not explaining our approach more clearly.  But this problem is not going to go away.  The tough stories I read in letters at night, they're not stopping.  I'm not going to walk away from these efforts.  And I won't walk away from you.  (Applause.)  And I don't think Congress should walk away, either.  We are going to keep working to get this done.  And I hope we can get some Republicans to join Democrats in understanding the urgency of the problem.  (Applause.)

On every one of these issues my door remains open to good ideas from both parties.  I want the Republicans off the sidelines.  I want them working with us to solve problems facing working families -- not to score points.  I want a partnership.  What we can't do, though -- here's what I'm not open to.  I don't want gridlock on issue after issue after issue when there's so many urgent problems to solve.  (Applause.)  And I don't want an attitude, "If Obama loses, then we win."  I mean, that can't be a platform.  (Applause.)  Even if you disagree with me on some specific issues, all of us should be rooting for each other.  (Applause.)  All of us should be working for America moving forward and solving problems. 

So that, you know, "you lose, I win" mentality, that mindset may be good for short-term politics, but it's not a mindset that's equal to these times.  (Applause.)  It's not worthy of you.  What you deserve is for all of us, Democrats and Republicans, to work through our differences, overcome our politics, do what is hard, do what is necessary to advance the American Dream and keep it alive for our time and for all time.  (Applause.)

We have come through a tough year, and a tough decade.  But a new year is here and a new decade is stretching before us.  Opportunities are there for the taking:  every business owner working on the innovation of tomorrow; every student reaching for a better future; every ready -- everyone ready to roll up their sleeves and play their part in rebuilding America. 

Yes, we can.  (Applause.)  We don't back down.  We don't quit.  We are Americans.  And today, here with all of you, I have never been more hopeful about our future than I am right now.  I am confident that we can make this happen and move this country forward. 

Thank you very much, Tampa.  I love you guys.  Thank you.  Thank you.  Thank you.  (Applause.)

All right, I've got -- everybody relax again.  Everybody relax.  (Laughter.)  I've got time for a few questions.  I'm going to take off my jacket here, just because -- (applause.)  Joe, are you going to hold my coat? 

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  You answer all the tough questions.  I'll hold the coat.  (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  I know there may be some tough questions here, so -- all right, here are the only rules to this.  I'm going to try to get in about five, six questions.  I will -- so I'm not going to be able to get to everybody.  I apologize in advance.  To make sure that it's fair, we're going to go girl, boy, girl, boy.  (Laughter.)  All right?  So I'm going to call on a young lady first, and then I'm going to call on a gentleman, and we're just going to keep on going down the line, and we'll get through as many as we can.

All right, everybody is pointing in this -- this young woman in the red here, so we'll start with you.  And if you don't mind, introduce yourself.  Wait for the microphone.  A microphone will be coming up and -- all right.

Q    Hello, Mr. President.  My name is Layla (phonetic), I'm a student at the University of South Florida.  (Applause.)

AUDIENCE:  Booo!

THE PRESIDENT:  Hey, Layla.  Uh-oh.  Uh-oh.  Come on, we can all get along here.  (Laughter.)  Tampa, behave yourselves. 

Q    First of all, I'd like to say that I did work on your campaign.  I think it's great what you did for the community because you involved us as the youth to understand the grassroots movement and what impact it can make.

THE PRESIDENT:  That's great.  Thank you.

Q    My question is, last night in your State of the Union address you spoke of America's support for human rights.  Then why have we not condemned Israel and Egypt's human rights violations against the occupied Palestinian people and yet we continue to support financially with billions of dollars coming from our tax dollars?

AUDIENCE:  Booo!

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay, now, everybody has got to be courteous, everybody is answering the question.

Let me just talk about the Middle East generally.  Look -- all right, everybody, come on, come on, hold on.  Hold on one second, I've got to answer my question first, sir.  Okay.  I know you got -- what, you got some beads on -- are those New Orleans beads?  Okay.

Look, look, look, the Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries.  And it's an issue that elicits a lot of passions, as you heard.

Here's my view.  Israel is one of our strongest allies.  It has -- (applause.)  Let me just play this out.  It is a vibrant democracy.  It shares links with us in all sorts of ways.  It is critical for us and I will never waver from ensuring Israel's security and helping them secure themselves in what is a very hostile region.  (Applause.)  So I make no apologies for that.

What is also true is that the plight of the Palestinians is something that we have to pay attention to, because it is not good for our security and it is not good for Israel's security if you've got millions of individuals who feel hopeless, who don't have an opportunity to get an education or get a job or what have you.

Now, the history of there is long and I don't have time to go through the grievances of both sides in the issue.  What I have said and what we did from the beginning when I came into office is to say we are seeking a two-state solution in which Israel and the Palestinians can live side by side in peace and security.  (Applause.)  In order to do that both sides are going to have to make compromises.  (Applause.)

As a first step, the Palestinians have to unequivocally renounce violence and recognize Israel.  (Applause.)  And Israel has to acknowledge legitimate grievances and interests of the Palestinians.  We know what a solution could look like in the region, but here's the problem that we're confronting right now, is that both in Israel and within the Palestinian Territories, the politics are difficult; they're divided.  The Israel government came in based on the support of a lot of folks who don't want to make a lot of concessions.  I think Prime Minister Netanyahu is actually making some effort to try to move a little bit further than his coalition wants him to go.  On the other hand, President Abbas of the Palestinian Authority, who I think genuinely wants peace, has to deal with Hamas, an organization that has not recognized Israel and has not disavowed violence.

And so we are working to try to strengthen the ability of both parties to sit down across the table and to begin serious negotiations.  And I think that it's important when we're talking about this issue to make sure that we don't just knee-jerk, use language that is inflammatory or in some fashion discourages the possibility of negotiation.  We've got to recognize that both the Palestinian people and Israelis have legitimate aspirations and they can be best served if the United States is helping them understand each other, as opposed to demonizing each other.

All right.  (Applause.)  Okay.  All right.  It's a gentleman's turn.  It's a gentleman's turn.  This gentleman here -- I'm going to go on the other side of the room.  The gentleman in the yellow tie.

Q    Bill Segal, Orange County Commissioner.  Welcome, Mr. President.  What's the decision matrix going to look like for high-speed rail?  How are we going to decide who gets what?  And when is the announcement going to be made?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I probably should have Mr. Biden talk about this because he has been working diligently overseeing the Recovery Act.  Let me make a general point about high-speed rail as well as the way the infrastructure is being moved through the Recovery Act.

General point number one is that making an investment in infrastructure is a two-fer, because it creates jobs immediately and it lays the foundation for a vibrant economy in the future.  So it's one of our best investments.  But it's expensive.  We've got a couple of trillion dollars' worth of infrastructure repairs just on our old infrastructure, our existing infrastructure -- our roads, our bridges.  People remember what happened to the bridge up in Minneapolis that just buckled and collapsed.  Well, unfortunately, we've got a lot of aging infrastructure.  Some of it is not as visible as bridges, some of it is water systems, pipes underground that essentially were built back in the 1930s -- in some cases even older than that.  So we're going to have to make a commitment to our long-term infrastructure.

And one of the things that we're hoping to do is as we make more investments in infrastructure under my administration that we start figuring out ways that we can take some of the politics out of infrastructure -- and what I mean by that is right now a lot of decisions are made about projects based on who's got the most powerful congressman or senator.  And what we're hoping to do is at least some of the decision-making based a little bit more on what are the engineering plans that determine this is the best project to go forward.

And one way of doing that is to create what's called an infrastructure bank where at least a certain amount of infrastructure money, particularly for new projects, would be guided by some clear criteria, a lot of transparency, engineers and urban planners and city planners involved in the process so that we can also get some regional planning.  Because part of what happens when politics is involved in transportation is that the commissioner over here may not have the same ideas, the mayor over here may not have the same idea as the senator over there -- except they all represent a similar region.  And so you get a whole bunch of traffic systems that don't work and aren't efficient and don't serve commuters very well at all.  So that's the kind of general direction that we'd like to move to.

The second point I would make is that if we're going to be making investments in infrastructure anyway, we can't just look backwards, we've got to look forward.  I mean, how many people here have been on one of these high-speed trains?  When you were traveling outside the country, unfortunately, for the most part.  I mean, those things are fast, they are smooth.  You don't have to take off your shoes.  (Laughter.)  Right?  Check to see if you're wearing the socks with no holes in them.

Why is it we don't have those?  Now, part of it is we're a very big country, we're not as densely populated as some countries in Europe and Asia -- and let's face it, we just love our cars.  We love our cars.  We don't love gas prices, but we love our cars.

Q    What about gas prices?

THE PRESIDENT:  But -- well, what about gas prices, right?  (Laughter.)  I'll talk about that in a second, but -- no, you know what?  I'll talk about it now.

Even if -- and I mentioned last night we have to increase production on oil, we have to increase production on natural gas, because we're not going to be able to get all our clean energy up and running quickly enough to meet all of our economic growth needs.  But even if we are increasing production we've got to get started now decreasing our use and making our economy more efficient.  (Applause.)

And so that's why we need to invest in infrastructure like high-speed rail that will allow us to choose the option of taking the train.  (Applause.)  And if more and more facilities like that are available that's going to be good, as I said, for the economy of the region and it's going to be good for individual lifestyles because people aren't going to be stuck in traffic for two hours.  It'll increase productivity.  People will get to work on time a lot faster.  They'll be less aggravated.  Right?

Now, Joe, in terms of the high-speed rail here, do you have something specific to say?

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  I'll make it real simple.  Think of the Interstate Highway System in the '50s.  What you did is you pick the portions where you could begin to build where there was the most likely to have the heaviest traffic, so that people would use it the most, and then just build that out.

What we did is we picked -- the Department of Transportation picked the Orlando-Tampa route, Tampa-Orlando, because you were most ready, your plans were the most advanced -- (applause) -- and the objective is it's not just going to be here, it's all the way -- going to come around all the way heading up going down to Miami as well.  (Applause.)  That's why we picked California.  California, Mr. President, there's over a $2 billion investment because they had plans, they're ready to go.

And I might add, they're both Republican governors -- so we didn't pick this based on politics.  I mean this sincerely.  (Applause.)  So we're picking the places that make the most sense, have the highest density, are ready to go.  And there's been $55 billion worth of requests coming from the states.  The good news about that, Mr. President, is we're also funding, with some of the money, planning efforts, because some of the plans aren't complete enough.

And lastly, Mr. President, we are making a big difference with a portion of this money -- over a billion dollars of the $8 billion -- on taking railroads, for example, from Richmond to Washington, that go 65 miles an hour.  By getting that up to 110 miles an hour you take a whole lot of cars off the highway, it becomes economically reasonable to do it.  So we're taking corridors that in fact exist where we can increase the mileage enough that it can make a difference on congestion.

And I'll point out one thing:  I-95 -- and you all know I-95 on the other side of the state -- I-95 going all the way up at Marway (phonetic) in the congested areas cost $22 million per lane to build per mile.  You can build this railroad for less than $2 million in that.  (Applause.)  So it makes sense.  It's where it works.  And we're going to have to build it out.  (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Good.  Let me just say -- let me just say, by the way, give a compliment to Vice President Biden.  He and his team have overseen the Recovery Act.  You have not seen scandal break out on a huge endeavor.  You know, people complain a lot about how government works and wastes money, et cetera.  The truth is, is that if you look at how the recovery dollars have been spent, they have been spent the way they were promised.  And there's complete transparency, so you guys can go on the White House Web site and look at every single project that has been awarded a Recovery Act grant, every single one, and scrutinize them.  You know who the contractors are, you know who's doing the work, you know when it's supposed to be finished.  So you can check out all this stuff and you will be able to monitor how the high-speed rail project here is operating just by going to our Web site.

All right, it's a young lady's turn.  All right.  Let me -- it's a woman's turn, so -- all right, how about -- she's jumping up and down right here.  There we go.

Q    Wow.

THE PRESIDENT:  All right, but you can't blow your whistle, though.  All right.  (Laughter.)

Q    President Obama, my name is Rashonda Williams (phonetic).  I'm from Kissimmee, Florida.  I don't know if Ms. Tchen has given you the poem that I wrote you.

THE PRESIDENT:  Not yet.

Q    Ask Ms. Tchen.  She came to the Center for Drug-Free Living over in Orlando.

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay. 

Q    And I wrote a poem for you winning the presidency; I printed it up and put it on a nice background.  But my question is -- and I told her to give it to you.

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay, I'll be looking for it.

Q    So you ask Miss Tina for that.  My question is, my brothers are in and out of jail, with the drugs, the selling of the drugs.  And a lot of them can't get jobs coming out.  So the only thing they know is to go back to what they -- what they're used to, because of their felonies.  My brother is 27; he has 33 felonies -- drug felonies, mind you.  So what I'm saying is, is there anything that could be put into motion that can get these guys, coming from prison, get in a system where they can get hired and get their self-esteem built back up so that they don't have to go back out to the street to sell drugs?  (Applause.)  Because if they don't hire them, all they're going to do is continue to sell the drugs.  So we need some kind of company that can teach these gentlemen coming out some kind of trade that will keep them from going back out and selling these drugs.

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay, well, first of all, I look forward to reading your poem. 

Look, we've got a great challenge in particularly our inner-city communities.  But, actually, if you go to rural communities in the Midwest right now, they may be selling different drugs but you're seeing some of the same patterns. 

Joe and I were campaigning in Iowa, and you'd go into small towns where you wouldn't think there would ever be a problem with the drug trade, and the methamphetamine trade was identical to the crack trade in the big cities -- same patterns of young people getting drawn in.

So a couple of things have to happen to deal with this problem.  Number one, the single most important thing we can do is to make sure that our very young children are getting a healthy start in life and that their parents, or parent, or caregiver, have the support that's necessary so that they can stay on a straight path of success in school, because if young people -- if their minds are active and they're doing well in school, they are less likely to fall prey to either using drugs or deciding to deal in drugs.  (Applause.)

And that's why I mentioned yesterday -- I mentioned yesterday the single best anti-poverty program around is a world-class education.  (Applause.)  That's why we're going to invest in early childhood education.  That's why we are reforming and pushing states and communities to reform how education works. 

And by the way, we've gotten into trouble sometimes not just from conservatives but sometimes from liberals because we're trying to shake up low-performing schools.  People say, well, why don't you just give them more money?  And my attitude is, you know what?  We can give more money to schools -- that's important -- small class sizes, better classrooms, all those things I care deeply about.  But that money will not make a dime's bit of difference if we're not also reforming how kids are learning -- (applause) -- making sure that our teachers know their subject matter, and that they know the best ways to teach; making sure that parents are staying on top of kids and instilling a sense of excellence and performance in those youth.

So that -- I want to make that point first, because, frankly, it would be so much easier to work with your brother, if he hadn't gone to jail in the first place, to get a job.  Thirty-three felonies is a lot.  I mean, that's a long rap sheet, which means that it's very -- I'm just being realistic.  If I'm a business owner, and I'm saying to myself, right now the unemployment rate is 10 percent, so there are a whole lot of folks who have never been to jail who are looking for a job -- it's hard for me to say, I'll choose the guy who went to jail instead of the person who never went to jail and has been laid off.

Now, having said that, what is also true -- what you say is exactly right, that if we can't break the cycle, then all we're doing is just churning folks in a revolving door -- through the jail system, back on the streets, back to dealing drugs, back to -- and this is part of my faith, my religious faith, but you don't have to be religious to, I think, believe in the idea of redemption, that people can get a second chance, that people can change.  (Applause.)

So one of the things that we've done is, actually Vice President Biden, myself, some Republicans -- Sam Brownback, for example, of Kansas -- have worked together to promote what we call the Second Chance Act, which links ex-offenders with programs that can provide them with skills, that can provide them with opportunities to get some work experience, and then can essentially certify that they are ready for the workplace; and then trying to encourage private sector companies to hire some of these ex-offenders.

The program is not as well funded as I would like.  We'd like to see if we can do more with it.  It has to be done in a partnership with state and local communities.  But I do think it's something that ends up being actually wise for taxpayers because every prisoner is costing us about $16,000, $18,000, $20,000, and every one of us are paying for it.  So if we can find programs that work, breaking that cycle, ultimately that can be a good investment for taxpayers all across the country.  (Applause.)

All right.  All right, it's a man's turn.  I'm going to call on that big guy right there with a little hair.  (Laughter.)  Since the microphone is right next to him. 

Q    Thank you.  My name is Steve Gordon.  I'm from Clearwater.  And I manufacture -- I own a small company, environmental company.  I manufacture the Instant-Off water-saving device that fits on any faucet worldwide.  I'm frustrated because I can create 500 jobs; I've gone to the banks, I can't get a loan.  And I speak for all businesses in the United States.  (Applause.)  We are tired of dealing with banks.  And I don't understand -- and this is my question for you, is that I know you care, I know you're trying.  And I appreciate the pledge of $30 billion to small businesses.  But lending it to the banks to lend to us is not the answer.  It's just not.

What I suggest, and the question is, why can't you use the SBA just like you lent directly to Wall Street, you lent directly to the automakers, you lent directly to the banks -- why can't the government make small businesses available directly to us?  (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, this is a good question.  Look, first of all, you should be aware that we have increased SBA loans during the course of this year by 70 percent in some cases.  So some of the key programs for businesses like yours we have massively increased their lending.  And by the way, we've waived some of the fees and red tape that are associated with you getting a loan from the SBA.

Now, it's not enough.  Just -- I know you're shaking your head here.  I understand it's not enough because you still want a loan.  So -- but you need to -- I just want you to know, it's not like we haven't thought of why don't we use the SBA.  We have.  The challenge that we've got is, is that even SBA loans are generally run not by the SBA; the SBA essentially works with local banks, community banks, neighborhood banks, to process the loan.  And essentially the SBA underwrites the loan. 

And so the SBA does not have the infrastructure to go all across the country in every region and process loans to small businesses directly because they don't have enough people.  Somebody yelled, "Why not?"  The SBA doesn't have the staff to do it. 

Keep in mind, a small business loan of any sort, or a large business loan of any sort requires some sense of, all right, what's the business plan, what are your projected earnings, et cetera, et cetera.  And somebody has got to do that.  Now, if the SBA were to suddenly take over that entire function we'd have to stand up a massive bureaucracy -- a huge one.  And we'd have to train all those people and it would take too long, and you'd be frustrated -- why is it that this big government agency can't seem to run anything?

So what we've decided to do instead is to take $30 billion that was repaid by the banks and make that available under criteria that will encourage small banks to give those loans to you.  And if we do that effectively, we can potentially get that money out the door more quickly.

But I am absolutely sympathetic to what you're saying because I'm hearing it everywhere I go.  And I -- that's why I mentioned it last night in my speech.  You've got a lot of small business owners who are ready to grow, ready to hire, but they just can't get financing.  So we're going to use the SBA as one tool; this $30 billion is going to help.  Ultimately, though, the vast majority of small businesses, their loans are going to come from the private sector.  And we've got to get the private sector to think differently.

What happened here was that everybody was making loans without thinking of the risk at all.  They were just sending out money out the door; that's how a lot of overdevelopment happened here in Florida, it happened in Nevada, it happened in California -- because people were just saying, you know what, we're making money, we're not going to ask a lot of questions.  Suddenly the bottom falls out.  And the pendulum has shifted too far in the other direction so that even if you've got a good business plan, you've got a good model and you're making profits and a good product, now banks are reluctant to lend at all.

And what we're trying to do is to encourage them to get that happy medium where they're not taking such exorbitant risks that they threaten the entire system, but they're also open to enough risk that America's dynamic free enterprise system is actually able to work.

One role -- one aspect of this is also getting regulators who oversee the banks -- which aren't under my supervision; these are independent bank regulators -- getting them to at least take a closer look at their policies, because a lot of bankers will tell you they want to loan you the money but they're worried about -- they suffered all these losses because of some of the mortgage stuff going belly up.  So what they'll tell you is, I've got a bank regulator breathing down my neck making sure that I'm keeping my capital levels high enough.  And we're going to have to make some adjustments there.  But that's not something the administration can do directly.  We can just encourage these independent regulators to take a closer look at it.

I'm confident you're going to succeed, though.  And you can give maybe Reggie Love here your business card so we can find out about your terrific business.  (Applause.)

All right, I've got time only for -- I've only got time -- I've only got time for two more questions.  This young lady right here, she's been standing here a very long time.

Q    First, my 15-year-old son, Zach Cartwright (phonetic), wanted me to tell you that he is a big supporter of yours.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, tell Zach thank you so much. 

Q    Many families are having to withdraw money from their 401(k)s.  Once this occurs, in addition to taxes there's a 10 percent penalty assessed.  Since the withdrawals are taking place due to hardship, families don't always have the money to pay the 10 percent and the penalties.  The interest then accrues until the day full payment is made.  The IRS recently made headlines after giving tax breaks to Citigroup.  Several months ago people with offshore accounts were given amnesty.  My question is, why is the IRS coming after the middle class, creating more stress for us?  (Applause.)  And what is your plan to help resolve this?  And if Congress is unable to deal with the issue directly impacting the middle class, I'm happy to contribute my ideas.  (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, this is something that actually I personally experienced -- this was several years ago.  Michelle and I had some family emergencies -- this was when I was still working in a law firm.  I had a small retirement account set up and I ended up having to withdraw it and pay that 10 percent penalty, and it was no fun.  But it was what we had to do.  And fortunately we were young enough where we could absorb that hit.  A lot of families aren't in that position, if they've got a nest egg, to suddenly have to -- it's bad enough having to draw it down, but then also to have to pay taxes on top of it is really tough.

Now, the reason that policy is in place, obviously, is because you're getting that money tax-free, the idea being that you're going to actually use it for retirement.  And then if you're spending it early, before retirement, then you can imagine that a lot of people could potentially game the system by using these accounts to avoid taxes.  So I just want to show a little sympathy here for those who are trying to enforce the law -- they're not mean-spirited, they're just trying to -- they're working with the system that was set up.

I think you are raising a legitimate point, though.  And if I'm not mistaken we actually started looking at this, Joe, in our administration -- was to take a look at are there circumstances -- and the specific thing that we were thinking about was medical emergencies -- where people should not be penalized for it.  And I think that issuing blanket amnesties in all circumstances may not be possible.  But taking a look at certain narrow categories of emergencies in which these penalties could be waived is something that we have discussed and I think we could explore.  All right?  (Applause.)

Okay.  All right.  I got one more -- okay, everybody is pointing at this young man, so I'm going to call on this guy right here.  I think that's all his sisters were all pointing at him.  They're like, "Oh, call on my brother."  (Laughter.)

Q    All right, I'm Hector and I'm a student at UT.  (Applause.)  And my question is, last night you talked about repealing "don't ask, don't tell," and my question is what are you doing now to put in motion so that same-sex couples and homosexuals are treated as equal citizens of the United States, i.e., same-sex marriages and the thousand-plus benefits that heterosexual couples enjoy after marriage?  (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Look, as I said last night, my belief is, is that a basic principle in our Constitution is that if you're obeying the law, if you're following the rules, that you should be treated the same, regardless of who you are.  (Applause.)  I think that principle applies to gay and lesbian couples.  So at the federal level, one of the things that we're trying to do is to make sure that partnerships are recognized for purposes of benefits so that hospital visitation, for example, is something that is permitted; that Social Security benefits or pension benefits or others, that same-sex couples are recognized in all those circumstances.

I think that we've got to -- we actually have an opportunity of passing a law that's been introduced in Congress right now, and my hope is this year we can get it done, just for federal employees and federal workers.  A lot of companies, on their own, some of the best-run companies have adopted these same practices. I think it's the right thing to do and it makes sense for us to take a leadership role in ensuring that people are treated the same.  (Applause.) 

Look, if you are -- regardless of your personal opinions, the notion that somebody who's working really hard for 30 years can't take their death benefits and transfer them to the person that they love the most in the world and who has supported them all their lives, that just doesn't seem fair.  It doesn't seem right.  (Applause.)  And I think it's the right thing to do.

Okay, look, guys -- listen, everybody.  I've got to take off. 

AUDIENCE:  No!

THE PRESIDENT:  Wait, wait.  But I warned you guys I couldn't answer every question.  Let me just say in closing -- let me just say this in closing.  (Applause.)  Let me say this in closing -- hold on a second, hold on a second, hold on, hold on a second.

I want to say this.  Look, we've gone through a very difficult year.  But I have great optimism that we have begun to dig ourselves out of this hole.  In order for us to do it successfully, we're going to have to work together, we're going to have to listen to each other, we're going to have to be respectful of each other. 

So I want to end on mentioning something that I talked about last night.  You know, our political dialogue in this country has always been noisy and messy because we come from different places, we've got different ideas, different beliefs.  I understand all that.  But we're all Americans.  We all should anticipate that the other person, even if they disagree with us, has the best of intentions.  We don't have to call them names.  We don't have to demonize them.  And that's true whether you are a Democrat or a Republican, whether you are a conservative or a liberal, or an independent -- being respectful and listening to other people's point of views, and understanding that most of these issues are complicated. 

Look, let me take the example of health care.  Part of the reason why it's so easy to scare people about health care, even if they don't like it the way it is now, is because you've got doctors, you've got nurses, you've got hospitals, you've got insurance systems, you've got Medicaid, you've got Medicare, you've got the VA system -- all these systems constitute several trillion dollars, one-sixth of our economy.  Even if you come up with a great plan that lowers premiums and creates greater competition and ensures freedom for you to choose your doctor and is bringing down the deficit -- all the things that I've claimed -- and prevents insurance companies from abusing customers -- even if we do all that, there's going to be somebody out there in a $2 trillion system who's unhappy with something.  Right?

So they'll complain, well, you know, I'm a medical device manufacturer and if you reform the system that might force me to change how I sell my products; or there's going to be a doctor who says, well, you know what, right now I get charged this way and if you change how Medicare reimburses, then I might have to change my billing system and that's going to cost me a few thousand dollars and I don't like that. 

The reason I'm pointing this out is if we're going to do big things on energy, or health care, or infrastructure, then we're going to have some differences.  We've got to work them through.  Nothing that human beings do will be perfect.  But we shouldn't sort of assume that the other side is either heartless and doesn't care about sick people, or is some socialist communist who's trying to take over the health care system, or -- you know, we start getting into these caricatures of each other.  They're so damaging.  And, frankly, the political parties and the media haven't been helping.  They've been making it worse.  (Applause.)

I want to dial some of that back.  Let's start thinking of each other as Americans first, figuring out how we can help one another, figuring out how we can move this country forward.  I'm confident we'll do great.

Thank you, everybody.  God bless you.  Thank you.  (Applause.)

END
2:36 P.M. EST

Close Transcript

Caring for Caregivers

This week the Middle Class Task Force unveiled a series of initiatives in the President's FY 11 budget that are aimed at helping families with soaring child care costs, balancing work with caring for elderly relatives or people with disabilities, paying for college, and saving for retirement.  These are costs that – along with health care – have risen dramatically for families at a time when their incomes haven't.   Some people call this "squeeze" because of the pressure these costs put on family budgets.  But for many families it just seems like it is impossible to get ahead.

This is particularly true for the so-called "sandwich generation" – people who are caring for children (or grandchildren or adult children who are struggling financially) and their parents.   The Vice President often speaks very personally about his experience caring for his parents and in-laws.  And almost all of us know someone who has juggled caring for a parent or relative who can’t get along completely on their own.  Millions of Americans provide unpaid care to aging relatives – including approximately 23 million caregivers with jobs and 12 million who are also caring for their own children.   That's why the Middle Class Task Force’s "squeeze" initiative includes help for family caregivers. 

These caregivers play a vital role in helping seniors stay in their communities or at home.  But too often they don’t have the support they need to balance caregiving with work and family responsibilities.  As Elinor Ginzler of AARP put it:

"AARP is grateful that the Middle Class Task Force has drawn attention  to an issue that is deeply important to our members—the critical role of family caregivers and what we should be doing to help them.  Approximately 65 million Americans provide care to a loved one, giving more than $375 billion worth of unpaid care each year—often at their own financial and emotional expense.  Increasing support to these invaluable individuals would be an important step to help those who do so much to help others."

The nearly $103 million investment proposed by the Middle Class Task Force will support more respite care, counseling, training, referrals, and adult day care.  As Sandy Markwood, CEO of National Association for Area Agencies on Aging explained:

"Vice President Biden’s Middle Class Task Force’s recommendation to increase funding for the National Family Caregiver Support Program and Lifespan Respite, along with strengthening supportive services through Title III-B of the Older Americans Act, represents a huge investment in community-based programs that support the independence of older Americans and their caregivers. These funds will enable them to access and get the critical services that they need while avoiding unnecessary and more expensive institutional care or spending down to Medicaid.  We applaud the work that has been done by the Administration that serves to strengthen long term living options through home and community-based services."

The extra funding proposed by the Task Force will allow nearly 200,000 additional caregivers to be served and 3 million more hours of respite care to be provided.  It adds funding to programs that provide transportation help, adult day care, and in-home services including aides to help bathe and cook.  Some have said these things are modest.  And, to some extent, they are. But sometimes it is these small things that add up to make all the difference.

Eric Hall, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Alzheimers Foundation of America is well aware of the vital help these services give families:

"Family caregivers who struggle each day with practical and financial challenges have been anxiously waiting for this issue to be brought to the national stage and for relief in their own homes and communities. For these families, assistance at any level can help delay nursing home placement and enhance caregiver well being. The proposed initiatives represent a welcome change in direction, from minimal or flatlined funding to amounts that will make a difference for hundreds of thousands of American families."

And here’s what Gail Hunt, CEO of the National Alliance for Caregiving who represents family caregivers said:

"The National Alliance for Caregiving is proud to support the Middle Class Task Force and their efforts to support family caregivers. This is a wonderful addition to the National Family Caregiver Support Program and it is a perfect way to recognize these caregivers who on average spend 18 hours a week providing care.  The funding for transportation, adult day care and other services under Title III b will also help family caregivers by assisting the older adult they are caring for. We are grateful to the Middle Class Task Force for bringing much needed public awareness to the family caregiver."

The caregiver initiative won’t magically alleviate all the strain on caregivers and their families – but it is an important first step toward providing more support for families and caregivers and the vital services they are performing.

Terrell McSweeny is Domestic Policy Advisor to the Vice President

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President and the Vice President at Town Hall Meeting in Tampa, Florida

University of Tampa Bob Martinez Sports Center, Tampa, Florida

1:14 P.M. EST

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Thank you all very, very much.  Thank you all very much.  It's amazing the crowds I draw.  (Laughter.)  It's great to be with you all today.  And I really hope you all got to hear the President's speech last night.  (Applause.)  Wasn't it good?  I think the President laid out with clarity and power what we've done, what we're going to do, and how we're committed to getting it done.  (Applause.)

He laid out a clear and ambitious plan -- a plan that flows from our core principles, the principles we ran on, our core mission that we said we were going to attend to when we took office a year ago.  And that was very simple:  to restore the middle class in America.  (Applause.)

Look, because of the President's bold leadership, we weathered the most ferocious economic storm this nation has seen since the Great Depression, keeping us from sliding into a depression, as some leading economists suggested.  The President from the outset has understood that it's all about jobs, but there's a lot of business to attend to just to keep us from sliding off the edge. 

Well, ladies and gentlemen, the President knows one other thing.  In a sense, it's more than about jobs.  A job is more than a paycheck.  It's about dignity and it's about respect.  And too many people have lost it.  (Applause.) 

Ladies and gentlemen, President Obama understands that the longest walk a mother or father can make is a trip up a short flight of stairs to their child's bedroom to say, "Honey, I'm sorry, you're not going to be able to stay at Stewart Middle School next year, or you can't play on West Tampa's Little League team next year, honey.  We're going to have to move because daddy or mommy lost their job, or because the bank said we can't keep our house." 

My dad made that walk when I was a kid in our home in Scranton, Pennsylvania.  I remember vividly my father walking up the stairs and I sitting on the end of the bed with my sister, Valerie, the only one old enough to understand what he was talking about.  He said, "I'm sorry, honey, but I'm going to have to move."

The first thought I had was, God, they're getting divorced -- literally.  That's what worried me.  He said, "I've got to move, honey.  You and Val are going to stay here with Mom and Jimmy and you're going to stay here with Grandpa, because Dad has to move to Delaware.  I'll be back.  It will take about a year, but I'll come back and forth.  But we're going to be okay."

Wasn't until I got older I realized how hard that must have been for my father to make that walk; how hard it must have been for him to go into the kitchen before that walk and say to his father-in-law, "Ambrose, can you do me a favor?  Can you keep my family?  Can Jean and the kids stay here with you?  I'll try to do it as quick as I can.  But there's no jobs."

Ladies and gentlemen, too many Floridians have had to make that walk over the last two years.  And the President and I understand.  We understand.  And we're determined to make sure that every hardworking Floridian, every hardworking American, is able to walk into his child's room and say, "Honey, it's going to be okay."  (Applause.)  That's what this is all about.  That's what this is all about.

As you heard last night, that's why we're putting in place the policies that will enable us to reduce the debt we inherited and deal with the spending required to keep us from falling off the cliff this year.  And during the process, you heard him say how we are reordering our country's priorities.  We're investing in health care, education, energy information, technology, health technology -- (applause) -- electric vehicles and batteries, investments that will help us build a new economy for the 21st century -- investments that will allow us to lead in the 21st century as we did in the 20th.

Ladies and gentlemen, we're determined to restore America to its rightful place at the leading edge of innovation, with bold ideas that will create jobs immediately and serve as the foundation, a new platform -- (applause) -- a new platform to build this economy on that will serve not just our immediate needs but future generations; ideas like wind power, solar energy, a smart grid, broadband -- (applause) -- and high-speed rail.  And that's why we're here today.  (Applause.)

Having made over 7,900 round trips, literally, on Amtrak, 250 miles a day, I am very familiar with rail.  (Laughter.)  And today you have no idea how pleased I am to talk about the announcement that we made yesterday awarding -- in total, nationwide -- nearly $8 billion from the Recovery Act, funding to move us in the direction of developing a high-speed rail service in 13 travel corridors covering 31 states all across this country.  (Applause.)

Ladies and gentlemen, these investments -- these investments have several goals:  first, to improve existing rail lines to make train service faster, more reliable; two, to pull cars off the road, reducing congestion, cutting pollution, and increasing productivity; and three, to begin to develop new corridors for high-speed trains that will go from 169 to 230 miles an hour.  (Applause.)

Ladies and gentlemen, like a corridor, right here from Tampa to Orlando -- (applause) -- so you'll be able to get on a train here to Orlando in less than an hour, without battling traffic and congestion, arrive at your destination.  Ladies and gentlemen, this single investment is not going to solve all our transportation issues overnight.  Instead, with more than $55 billion of proposals from 50 states all across the country, we're providing $8 billion in seed money.  And today's awards provide only initial funding for the rail system.  Like Tampa and Orlando route, more funding is going to come in the future as progress is made.

We have committed to another $5 billion in funding over the next five years.  It's a down payment on a truly national program that's going to reshape the way we travel.  It will change the way which we go from place to place, change the ways we work and live, and will connect communities to each other in a way that in the past was impossible.  Just like the Interstate Highway structure did back in the mid-'50s, it will have far-reaching consequences.

Let me ask you a question:  How can we, the leading nation in the world, be in a position where China, Spain, France -- and name all the other countries who have rail systems that are far superior to ours?

Ladies and gentlemen, it's about time we move.  But this time -- but this time, we're not only going to be providing a better way to transport; we're going to be taking cars off of congested highways, reducing carbon emissions, and saving billions of dollars in human productivity lost just sitting in traffic jams, as studies point out.

Most important, we're creating jobs -- good jobs.  (Applause.)  Construction jobs.  Manufacturing jobs.  And we're going to be creating them right now.  We're going to spur economic development in the future and we're making our communities more livable all in the process. 

And ladies and gentlemen, it's now my pleasure to introduce the man who's leading us in this new era of adventure, the President of the United States of America.  (Applause.)  President Barack Obama.  (Applause.) 

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you, everybody.  Hello, Tampa!  (Applause.)  Thank you so much.  Thank you, everybody.  It's great to see you.  All right, everybody just make yourselves comfortable.  We're going to be here for a little bit.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Thank you.

We've got -- we've got some special guests that I want to make sure we acknowledge.  Florida CFO Alex Sink is in the house.  (Applause.)  Representative Kathy Castor, your representative.  (Applause.)  Representative Alan Grayson.  (Applause.)  Representative Kendrick Meek.  (Applause.)  Representative Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.  (Applause.)  Your own mayor, Pam Iorio.  (Applause.)  The mayor of Orlando, Buddy Dyer.  (Applause.)  The president of University of Tampa, Ronald Vaughn.  (Applause.) 

And two very special -- two very special guests, Brian C. Smithey and Roger J. Picard.  I want you guys to know who these folks are.  They are members of the FEMA Florida Task Force Team 2 Canine Search Specialists.  They went down to Haiti and worked 26-hour-long shifts, staying with victims until they were rescued.  The Florida Task Force Team saved seven lives.  Brian worked at a school where his dog, Powder, found a young adult female buried in the rubble three to four days.  So these are the kinds of heroes that make America proud, and I want everybody to give them a big round of applause.  Stand up.  Stand up.  (Applause.)  Thank you.

And I haven't spotted him in the crowd yet, but I've got to do this -- even though I know you all are upset that he took all that success to the Colts -- (applause) -- he made his name here in Tampa.  (Applause.)  And he's not just a great coach, but he's just a model individual and leader, we're very proud to have him in the house, Coach Tony Dungy.  (Applause.)

Any of you want some analysis about the upcoming Super Bowl, Coach is free to give -- no, I'm just -- it's good to see you, Coach.

All right.  Now, first of all let me say it's good to be back in the Sunshine State.  (Applause.)  It is especially good to be back in January.  (Laughter.)  And it's always nice to get out of Washington -- it is -- and spend a little time with the people who sent me to Washington.  (Applause.)

Now, last night I spoke with you about where we've been over the past year and where I believe we need to go.  And I said what all of you know from your own lives:  These are difficult times; these are challenging times for our country.

In the last two years, we've gone through the deepest recession since the Great Depression.  Think about that.  A big chunk of the people here -- certainly the younger people here -- have never even seen a recession; they don't even -- it doesn't register on their minds.  This is by far the toughest thing that the country has gone through economically since the 1930s.

And Tampa, like so many communities across our country, has felt the lash of shuttered businesses and lost jobs and home foreclosures and vanished or dwindling savings.  And this storm came at the end of what some call a lost decade -- because what happened between 2000 and now, it was a decade in which paychecks shrank and jobs barely grew, and the costs of everything from health care to college education went up.  Irresponsibility from Wall Street to Washington left good, responsible Americans who did everything right still struggling in ways they never imagined.

Joe and I took office in the middle of this raging storm.  We ran for office, the highest office, because we had been hearing stories like this day in, day out, for years, even before the financial crisis hit.  So we're not going to rest until we rebuild an economy in which hard work and responsibility are rewarded, and businesses are hiring again, and wages are growing again, and the middle class can get its legs underneath it again.  (Applause.)  We will not rest until we build an economy that's ready for America's future.

Now, to do that, the first thing we had to do was break the back of this recession.  And that required some tough, in some cases unpopular but unnecessary -- all which were necessary steps.  I mean -- I mentioned this last night -- none of us wanted to have to stabilize the banking sector, particularly since they helped create this mess.  (Applause.)  But, as I explained last night, if we hadn't, the financial system literally could have melted down and that would have taken our entire economy and millions more families and businesses with it.

But because of the steps we've taken, now the markets have stabilized.  The economy is growing again.  (Applause.)  The worst of the storm has passed.  But I think all of you understand the devastation remains.  One in 10 Americans still can't find work.  That's why creating jobs has to be our number one priority in 2010.  (Applause.) 

The true engines of job creation here in America are America's businesses.  And there are several steps we can take to help them expand and hire new workers.  Last night I proposed taking $30 billion of the money that went to Wall Street banks but have now been repaid and use it to help community banks give small businesses the credit they need to stay afloat.  (Applause.)  That will help.  I also proposed a new tax credit for more than 1 million small businesses that hire new workers or raise wages.  And while we're at it, I believe that we should eliminate all capital gains taxes on small business investment, and provide a tax incentive for all businesses to invest in new plants and equipment.  (Applause.)

As Joe mentioned, we're going to put more Americans to work rebuilding our infrastructure, and building our infrastructure of the future.  I mean, it's important to repave our roads; it's important to repair our bridges so that they're safe.  But we want to start looking deep into the 21st century -- (applause) -- and we want to say to ourselves, there is no reason why other countries can build high-speed rail lines and we can't.  (Applause.)  And that's what's about to happen right here in Tampa -- we are going to start building a new high-speed rail line -- (applause) -- right here in Tampa, building for the future, putting people to work.  (Applause.)

I'm excited.  I'm going to come back down here and ride it.  (Laughter and applause.)  Joe and I -- you all have a date.  When that thing is all set up, we'll come down here and check it out.  (Laughter.) 

And by the way, this high-speed rail line is being funded by the Recovery Act.  (Applause.)  And one other thing we can start doing for jobs here in America that I mentioned last night -- I talked about this all through the campaign.  We put this proposal in our budget, we keep on getting resistance, but we are going to keep on pushing to end tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas and give those tax breaks to companies that create jobs right here in the United States of America.  (Applause.)  It's the right thing to do.  It's the right thing to do.  It's the right thing to do.  (Applause.)

Now, I have to say this:  The steps that I just mentioned will help accelerate job growth in an economy that is already beginning to grow, but the steps we take alone won't make up for the 7 million jobs we lost over the last two years.  I mean, keep in mind, when we were sworn into office, that December we had lost 650,000 jobs.  January, as we were being sworn in, we lost 700,000 jobs; February, 650,000 jobs.  So before we could even put in place the Recovery Act, you had already seen millions of jobs lost.  That's a deep hole that we're going to have to fill.  And the only way to do that is to lay a new foundation for long-term economic growth and finally address the struggles that middle-class families have been grappling with for years.

Now, Florida, that's why Joe and I asked for the chance to serve as your President and Vice President.  (Applause.)  Look, we didn't seek this office to push our problems off or take the easy road through the next election.  We ran to solve problems -- problems that had been nagging at America for decades.  We want to solve them for the next generation.  We ran to get the tough stuff done.  (Applause.)  So as I mentioned last night, I make no apology for trying to fix stuff that's hard, because -- (applause) -- I'll be honest with you -- I'll be honest with you, Joe and I are both pretty smart politicians, we've been at this a while.  (Laughter.)  The easiest way to keep your poll numbers high is to say nothing and to do nothing that offends anybody.  (Applause.)  That's true.  No, no, no, you just wave, smile and -- (laughter.)  That's how you do it.

The minute you actually start doing something, somebody is going to disagree with you.  (Applause.)  But that's what I promised.  Some of you remember the campaign.  I said I wasn't just going to tell you what you want to hear, I was going to tell you what you need to hear.  (Applause.)  So none of this is new.  There's nothing that we have talked about since we entered the White House that we didn't talk about during the campaign.  And so long as we have the privilege of serving you, we will not stop fighting for your future, no matter how many lumps we've got to take to get it done.  (Applause.)

I do also have to just mention -- I'm going to mention -- you know I love you in the media, but I will mention this little aspect of our media.  Our friends with the pads and the pencils -- last week I went to Ohio and I started saying what I'm saying now, which is, I'm going to fight for your future.  And they got all worked up.  They got worked up last week.  They said, is he trying to change his message; is he trying to get more populist; is this a strategy that he's pursuing to boost this, that and the other; is this something new?

I just had to do a little rewind here of how we ran our grassroots campaign -- (applause) -- because I've got some news.  I've got some news of my own here.  I've been fighting for working folks my entire adult life.  (Applause.)  That's why I entered public service -- to fight for folks in Chicago.  That's why I ran for the state Senate.  That's why I ran for the U.S. Senate.  That's why I ran for President -- to fight for people here in Tampa, and people here in Florida, and to fight for people all across the United States of America.  (Applause.)

I seem to remember coming to Tampa two weeks before the election -- (applause) -- and you know what I said?  This is a quote, people can check -- I'm sure it was reported in the newspapers.  I said, "Change never comes without a fight."  (Applause.)  That was true then.  It's true now.  Change never comes without a fight, Florida.  So I won't stop fighting; I know you won't, either. 

We're not going to stop fighting to give our kids a world-class education, to make college more affordable, to make sure that by 2020 we have the highest rate of college attendance of any country in the world.  (Applause.)  So we proposed that graduates should only pay 10 percent of their income to pay back their student loans.  (Applause.)  Students like that.  (Applause.)  And what I've said is we'll forgive student loan debt after 20 years -- but after 10 if you choose a career in public service.  Because if you decide you want to be a teacher -- (applause) -- if you decide you want to be a cop, if you're not making huge amounts of money we don't want to discourage you from that because of the cost of college.  And by the way, I've been there and Michelle has been there -- it took us 10 full years to pay off Michelle's student loans, 15 to pay mine off.  (Laughter.)  So I've been there.  And our belief, and I think your belief, is in the United States of America nobody should go broke because they chose to go to college.  We want everybody to go to college, and we don't want them going broke doing it.  (Applause.)

We won't stop fighting to spark innovation and ignite a clean energy economy where America's workers are building solar panels and wind towers and cutting-edge batteries for automobiles -- because the nation that leads the clean energy revolution will be the nation that leads the global economy.  (Applause.)  And, as I said last night, other countries aren't waiting.  They want those jobs.  China wants those jobs.  Germany wants those jobs.  They are going after them hard, making the investments required.

We're not going to stop fighting to give every American a fair shake.  The first bill I signed into law was making sure that there was equal pay for equal work for women -- the Lilly Ledbetter Act -- (applause) -- because I think you should be paid the same for doing the same work.  That's just fair.  (Applause.)  And by the way, men, you should have been standing up clapping for that because -- (laughter) -- because most families today are depending on two paychecks, not one, to get by.  (Applause.)

We're not going to stop fighting to protect the American consumer.  That's why I signed a Credit Card Bill of Rights into law to protect you from surprise charges and retroactive rate hikes and other unfair rules.  That's why I'm fighting for a tough consumer financial protection agency to protect you against things like hidden fees that can make an ATM withdrawal cost 30 bucks.  (Applause.) 

I just want to be clear here, for the benefit of my friends in the back.  (Laughter.)  We need a strong financial sector.  Without it, businesses can't get capital to grow and create jobs.  Families can't finance a home loan or education.  So we want a healthy financial sector.  And there are folks all across the country working in banks who are doing great service to their community.  But we also need some rules of the road for Wall Street, so that reckless decisions made by a few don't take our economy over the side.  (Applause.)  That's common sense.  There's nothing radical about that.  In fact, the banks should want it because it would create greater stability in the system.

And, yes, we will not stop fighting for a health care system that works for the American people, not just for the insurance industry.  (Applause.)  We won't stop.  We want a system where you can't be denied care if you have a preexisting condition.  (Applause.)  You can't get thrown off your insurance right at the time when you get seriously ill.  We want a system where small businesses can get insurance at a price they can afford.  (Applause.)

Nobody pays more than small businesses and individuals who are self-employed in the insurance market, because they've got no leverage.  We want to change that by allowing them to be able to set up a pool.  We want to make sure that people who don't have coverage can find an affordable choice in a competitive marketplace.  (Applause.)  We want a system in which seniors don't have these huge gaps in their Medicare prescription drug coverage -- (applause) -- and where Medicare itself is on a sounder financial footing.  Those are the things that we're fighting for.

And I'm not going to stop on that, because it's the right thing to do, and by the way, if you are serious about reducing our deficit and debt you cannot accomplish it without reforming our health care system, because that's what's gobbling up more federal dollars than anything else.  (Applause.)  I don't understand folks who say they don't want to see government spending out of control, and then are fighting reforms that the Congressional Budget Office says would cut a trillion dollars off our deficit over the next two decades.  (Applause.)  Those aren't my numbers. 

Now, we're never going to stop fighting to cut waste and abuse in Washington.  We do have to rein in deficits that have been accumulating for too long.  Families across the country are tightening their belts and making tough decisions.  It's time for the federal government to do the same.  And that's why I proposed specific steps last night to bring the deficit down.  And I'm grateful that the Senate just passed, as we were flying down here to Florida, a rule called pay-as-you-go, or PAYGO, that was a big reason we had record surpluses in the 1990s instead of the record deficits that were handed to me when I ran -- walked into office.

Look, it's a very simply concept, this PAYGO.  It basically just says you got to pay as you go.  (Laughter.)  It's sort of how you live.  At least after you cut up those credit cards.  (Laughter.)  Basically, you want to start a new program?  Start a new program.  But you've got to end an old one that pays for it.  If you want to cut taxes, great, cut taxes.  But you've got to figure out how to fill the revenue that results when you lose that tax revenue.  So the idea is just honest accounting.  That's what's needed.

Let me say one more word about health care.  I just got to  -- I'm gnawing on this bone a little bit.  (Laughter.)  I know that the longer the process worked through on a complicated issue like this, the uglier it looked.  You know, there's -- and it doesn't help when you've got the insurance industry spending several hundred million dollars advertising against it, but -- but after a while, people didn't know what to think.  And you started asking yourselves, what's in it for me? 

And as I said last night, I take my share of the blame for not explaining our approach more clearly.  But this problem is not going to go away.  The tough stories I read in letters at night, they're not stopping.  I'm not going to walk away from these efforts.  And I won't walk away from you.  (Applause.)  And I don't think Congress should walk away, either.  We are going to keep working to get this done.  And I hope we can get some Republicans to join Democrats in understanding the urgency of the problem.  (Applause.)

On every one of these issues my door remains open to good ideas from both parties.  I want the Republicans off the sidelines.  I want them working with us to solve problems facing working families -- not to score points.  I want a partnership.  What we can't do, though -- here's what I'm not open to.  I don't want gridlock on issue after issue after issue when there's so many urgent problems to solve.  (Applause.)  And I don't want an attitude, "If Obama loses, then we win."  I mean, that can't be a platform.  (Applause.)  Even if you disagree with me on some specific issues, all of us should be rooting for each other.  (Applause.)  All of us should be working for America moving forward and solving problems. 

So that, you know, "you lose, I win" mentality, that mindset may be good for short-term politics, but it's not a mindset that's equal to these times.  (Applause.)  It's not worthy of you.  What you deserve is for all of us, Democrats and Republicans, to work through our differences, overcome our politics, do what is hard, do what is necessary to advance the American Dream and keep it alive for our time and for all time.  (Applause.)

We have come through a tough year, and a tough decade.  But a new year is here and a new decade is stretching before us.  Opportunities are there for the taking:  every business owner working on the innovation of tomorrow; every student reaching for a better future; every ready -- everyone ready to roll up their sleeves and play their part in rebuilding America. 

Yes, we can.  (Applause.)  We don't back down.  We don't quit.  We are Americans.  And today, here with all of you, I have never been more hopeful about our future than I am right now.  I am confident that we can make this happen and move this country forward. 

Thank you very much, Tampa.  I love you guys.  Thank you.  Thank you.  Thank you.  (Applause.)

All right, I've got -- everybody relax again.  Everybody relax.  (Laughter.)  I've got time for a few questions.  I'm going to take off my jacket here, just because -- (applause.)  Joe, are you going to hold my coat? 

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  You answer all the tough questions.  I'll hold the coat.  (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT:  I know there may be some tough questions here, so -- all right, here are the only rules to this.  I'm going to try to get in about five, six questions.  I will -- so I'm not going to be able to get to everybody.  I apologize in advance.  To make sure that it's fair, we're going to go girl, boy, girl, boy.  (Laughter.)  All right?  So I'm going to call on a young lady first, and then I'm going to call on a gentleman, and we're just going to keep on going down the line, and we'll get through as many as we can.

All right, everybody is pointing in this -- this young woman in the red here, so we'll start with you.  And if you don't mind, introduce yourself.  Wait for the microphone.  A microphone will be coming up and -- all right.

Q    Hello, Mr. President.  My name is Layla (phonetic), I'm a student at the University of South Florida.  (Applause.)

AUDIENCE:  Booo!

THE PRESIDENT:  Hey, Layla.  Uh-oh.  Uh-oh.  Come on, we can all get along here.  (Laughter.)  Tampa, behave yourselves. 

Q    First of all, I'd like to say that I did work on your campaign.  I think it's great what you did for the community because you involved us as the youth to understand the grassroots movement and what impact it can make.

THE PRESIDENT:  That's great.  Thank you.

Q    My question is, last night in your State of the Union address you spoke of America's support for human rights.  Then why have we not condemned Israel and Egypt's human rights violations against the occupied Palestinian people and yet we continue to support financially with billions of dollars coming from our tax dollars?

AUDIENCE:  Booo!

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay, now, everybody has got to be courteous, everybody is answering the question.

Let me just talk about the Middle East generally.  Look -- all right, everybody, come on, come on, hold on.  Hold on one second, I've got to answer my question first, sir.  Okay.  I know you got -- what, you got some beads on -- are those New Orleans beads?  Okay.

Look, look, look, the Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries.  And it's an issue that elicits a lot of passions, as you heard.

Here's my view.  Israel is one of our strongest allies.  It has -- (applause.)  Let me just play this out.  It is a vibrant democracy.  It shares links with us in all sorts of ways.  It is critical for us and I will never waver from ensuring Israel's security and helping them secure themselves in what is a very hostile region.  (Applause.)  So I make no apologies for that.

What is also true is that the plight of the Palestinians is something that we have to pay attention to, because it is not good for our security and it is not good for Israel's security if you've got millions of individuals who feel hopeless, who don't have an opportunity to get an education or get a job or what have you.

Now, the history of there is long and I don't have time to go through the grievances of both sides in the issue.  What I have said and what we did from the beginning when I came into office is to say we are seeking a two-state solution in which Israel and the Palestinians can live side by side in peace and security.  (Applause.)  In order to do that both sides are going to have to make compromises.  (Applause.)

As a first step, the Palestinians have to unequivocally renounce violence and recognize Israel.  (Applause.)  And Israel has to acknowledge legitimate grievances and interests of the Palestinians.  We know what a solution could look like in the region, but here's the problem that we're confronting right now, is that both in Israel and within the Palestinian Territories, the politics are difficult; they're divided.  The Israel government came in based on the support of a lot of folks who don't want to make a lot of concessions.  I think Prime Minister Netanyahu is actually making some effort to try to move a little bit further than his coalition wants him to go.  On the other hand, President Abbas of the Palestinian Authority, who I think genuinely wants peace, has to deal with Hamas, an organization that has not recognized Israel and has not disavowed violence.

And so we are working to try to strengthen the ability of both parties to sit down across the table and to begin serious negotiations.  And I think that it's important when we're talking about this issue to make sure that we don't just knee-jerk, use language that is inflammatory or in some fashion discourages the possibility of negotiation.  We've got to recognize that both the Palestinian people and Israelis have legitimate aspirations and they can be best served if the United States is helping them understand each other, as opposed to demonizing each other.

All right.  (Applause.)  Okay.  All right.  It's a gentleman's turn.  It's a gentleman's turn.  This gentleman here -- I'm going to go on the other side of the room.  The gentleman in the yellow tie.

Q    Bill Segal, Orange County Commissioner.  Welcome, Mr. President.  What's the decision matrix going to look like for high-speed rail?  How are we going to decide who gets what?  And when is the announcement going to be made?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I probably should have Mr. Biden talk about this because he has been working diligently overseeing the Recovery Act.  Let me make a general point about high-speed rail as well as the way the infrastructure is being moved through the Recovery Act.

General point number one is that making an investment in infrastructure is a two-fer, because it creates jobs immediately and it lays the foundation for a vibrant economy in the future.  So it's one of our best investments.  But it's expensive.  We've got a couple of trillion dollars' worth of infrastructure repairs just on our old infrastructure, our existing infrastructure -- our roads, our bridges.  People remember what happened to the bridge up in Minneapolis that just buckled and collapsed.  Well, unfortunately, we've got a lot of aging infrastructure.  Some of it is not as visible as bridges, some of it is water systems, pipes underground that essentially were built back in the 1930s -- in some cases even older than that.  So we're going to have to make a commitment to our long-term infrastructure.

And one of the things that we're hoping to do is as we make more investments in infrastructure under my administration that we start figuring out ways that we can take some of the politics out of infrastructure -- and what I mean by that is right now a lot of decisions are made about projects based on who's got the most powerful congressman or senator.  And what we're hoping to do is at least some of the decision-making based a little bit more on what are the engineering plans that determine this is the best project to go forward.

And one way of doing that is to create what's called an infrastructure bank where at least a certain amount of infrastructure money, particularly for new projects, would be guided by some clear criteria, a lot of transparency, engineers and urban planners and city planners involved in the process so that we can also get some regional planning.  Because part of what happens when politics is involved in transportation is that the commissioner over here may not have the same ideas, the mayor over here may not have the same idea as the senator over there -- except they all represent a similar region.  And so you get a whole bunch of traffic systems that don't work and aren't efficient and don't serve commuters very well at all.  So that's the kind of general direction that we'd like to move to.

The second point I would make is that if we're going to be making investments in infrastructure anyway, we can't just look backwards, we've got to look forward.  I mean, how many people here have been on one of these high-speed trains?  When you were traveling outside the country, unfortunately, for the most part.  I mean, those things are fast, they are smooth.  You don't have to take off your shoes.  (Laughter.)  Right?  Check to see if you're wearing the socks with no holes in them.

Why is it we don't have those?  Now, part of it is we're a very big country, we're not as densely populated as some countries in Europe and Asia -- and let's face it, we just love our cars.  We love our cars.  We don't love gas prices, but we love our cars.

Q    What about gas prices?

THE PRESIDENT:  But -- well, what about gas prices, right?  (Laughter.)  I'll talk about that in a second, but -- no, you know what?  I'll talk about it now.

Even if -- and I mentioned last night we have to increase production on oil, we have to increase production on natural gas, because we're not going to be able to get all our clean energy up and running quickly enough to meet all of our economic growth needs.  But even if we are increasing production we've got to get started now decreasing our use and making our economy more efficient.  (Applause.)

And so that's why we need to invest in infrastructure like high-speed rail that will allow us to choose the option of taking the train.  (Applause.)  And if more and more facilities like that are available that's going to be good, as I said, for the economy of the region and it's going to be good for individual lifestyles because people aren't going to be stuck in traffic for two hours.  It'll increase productivity.  People will get to work on time a lot faster.  They'll be less aggravated.  Right?

Now, Joe, in terms of the high-speed rail here, do you have something specific to say?

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  I'll make it real simple.  Think of the Interstate Highway System in the '50s.  What you did is you pick the portions where you could begin to build where there was the most likely to have the heaviest traffic, so that people would use it the most, and then just build that out.

What we did is we picked -- the Department of Transportation picked the Orlando-Tampa route, Tampa-Orlando, because you were most ready, your plans were the most advanced -- (applause) -- and the objective is it's not just going to be here, it's all the way -- going to come around all the way heading up going down to Miami as well.  (Applause.)  That's why we picked California.  California, Mr. President, there's over a $2 billion investment because they had plans, they're ready to go.

And I might add, they're both Republican governors -- so we didn't pick this based on politics.  I mean this sincerely.  (Applause.)  So we're picking the places that make the most sense, have the highest density, are ready to go.  And there's been $55 billion worth of requests coming from the states.  The good news about that, Mr. President, is we're also funding, with some of the money, planning efforts, because some of the plans aren't complete enough.

And lastly, Mr. President, we are making a big difference with a portion of this money -- over a billion dollars of the $8 billion -- on taking railroads, for example, from Richmond to Washington, that go 65 miles an hour.  By getting that up to 110 miles an hour you take a whole lot of cars off the highway, it becomes economically reasonable to do it.  So we're taking corridors that in fact exist where we can increase the mileage enough that it can make a difference on congestion.

And I'll point out one thing:  I-95 -- and you all know I-95 on the other side of the state -- I-95 going all the way up at Marway (phonetic) in the congested areas cost $22 million per lane to build per mile.  You can build this railroad for less than $2 million in that.  (Applause.)  So it makes sense.  It's where it works.  And we're going to have to build it out.  (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Good.  Let me just say -- let me just say, by the way, give a compliment to Vice President Biden.  He and his team have overseen the Recovery Act.  You have not seen scandal break out on a huge endeavor.  You know, people complain a lot about how government works and wastes money, et cetera.  The truth is, is that if you look at how the recovery dollars have been spent, they have been spent the way they were promised.  And there's complete transparency, so you guys can go on the White House Web site and look at every single project that has been awarded a Recovery Act grant, every single one, and scrutinize them.  You know who the contractors are, you know who's doing the work, you know when it's supposed to be finished.  So you can check out all this stuff and you will be able to monitor how the high-speed rail project here is operating just by going to our Web site.

All right, it's a young lady's turn.  All right.  Let me -- it's a woman's turn, so -- all right, how about -- she's jumping up and down right here.  There we go.

Q    Wow.

THE PRESIDENT:  All right, but you can't blow your whistle, though.  All right.  (Laughter.)

Q    President Obama, my name is Rashonda Williams (phonetic).  I'm from Kissimmee, Florida.  I don't know if Ms. Tchen has given you the poem that I wrote you.

THE PRESIDENT:  Not yet.

Q    Ask Ms. Tchen.  She came to the Center for Drug-Free Living over in Orlando.

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay. 

Q    And I wrote a poem for you winning the presidency; I printed it up and put it on a nice background.  But my question is -- and I told her to give it to you.

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay, I'll be looking for it.

Q    So you ask Miss Tina for that.  My question is, my brothers are in and out of jail, with the drugs, the selling of the drugs.  And a lot of them can't get jobs coming out.  So the only thing they know is to go back to what they -- what they're used to, because of their felonies.  My brother is 27; he has 33 felonies -- drug felonies, mind you.  So what I'm saying is, is there anything that could be put into motion that can get these guys, coming from prison, get in a system where they can get hired and get their self-esteem built back up so that they don't have to go back out to the street to sell drugs?  (Applause.)  Because if they don't hire them, all they're going to do is continue to sell the drugs.  So we need some kind of company that can teach these gentlemen coming out some kind of trade that will keep them from going back out and selling these drugs.

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay, well, first of all, I look forward to reading your poem. 

Look, we've got a great challenge in particularly our inner-city communities.  But, actually, if you go to rural communities in the Midwest right now, they may be selling different drugs but you're seeing some of the same patterns. 

Joe and I were campaigning in Iowa, and you'd go into small towns where you wouldn't think there would ever be a problem with the drug trade, and the methamphetamine trade was identical to the crack trade in the big cities -- same patterns of young people getting drawn in.

So a couple of things have to happen to deal with this problem.  Number one, the single most important thing we can do is to make sure that our very young children are getting a healthy start in life and that their parents, or parent, or caregiver, have the support that's necessary so that they can stay on a straight path of success in school, because if young people -- if their minds are active and they're doing well in school, they are less likely to fall prey to either using drugs or deciding to deal in drugs.  (Applause.)

And that's why I mentioned yesterday -- I mentioned yesterday the single best anti-poverty program around is a world-class education.  (Applause.)  That's why we're going to invest in early childhood education.  That's why we are reforming and pushing states and communities to reform how education works. 

And by the way, we've gotten into trouble sometimes not just from conservatives but sometimes from liberals because we're trying to shake up low-performing schools.  People say, well, why don't you just give them more money?  And my attitude is, you know what?  We can give more money to schools -- that's important -- small class sizes, better classrooms, all those things I care deeply about.  But that money will not make a dime's bit of difference if we're not also reforming how kids are learning -- (applause) -- making sure that our teachers know their subject matter, and that they know the best ways to teach; making sure that parents are staying on top of kids and instilling a sense of excellence and performance in those youth.

So that -- I want to make that point first, because, frankly, it would be so much easier to work with your brother, if he hadn't gone to jail in the first place, to get a job.  Thirty-three felonies is a lot.  I mean, that's a long rap sheet, which means that it's very -- I'm just being realistic.  If I'm a business owner, and I'm saying to myself, right now the unemployment rate is 10 percent, so there are a whole lot of folks who have never been to jail who are looking for a job -- it's hard for me to say, I'll choose the guy who went to jail instead of the person who never went to jail and has been laid off.

Now, having said that, what is also true -- what you say is exactly right, that if we can't break the cycle, then all we're doing is just churning folks in a revolving door -- through the jail system, back on the streets, back to dealing drugs, back to -- and this is part of my faith, my religious faith, but you don't have to be religious to, I think, believe in the idea of redemption, that people can get a second chance, that people can change.  (Applause.)

So one of the things that we've done is, actually Vice President Biden, myself, some Republicans -- Sam Brownback, for example, of Kansas -- have worked together to promote what we call the Second Chance Act, which links ex-offenders with programs that can provide them with skills, that can provide them with opportunities to get some work experience, and then can essentially certify that they are ready for the workplace; and then trying to encourage private sector companies to hire some of these ex-offenders.

The program is not as well funded as I would like.  We'd like to see if we can do more with it.  It has to be done in a partnership with state and local communities.  But I do think it's something that ends up being actually wise for taxpayers because every prisoner is costing us about $16,000, $18,000, $20,000, and every one of us are paying for it.  So if we can find programs that work, breaking that cycle, ultimately that can be a good investment for taxpayers all across the country.  (Applause.)

All right.  All right, it's a man's turn.  I'm going to call on that big guy right there with a little hair.  (Laughter.)  Since the microphone is right next to him. 

Q    Thank you.  My name is Steve Gordon.  I'm from Clearwater.  And I manufacture -- I own a small company, environmental company.  I manufacture the Instant-Off water-saving device that fits on any faucet worldwide.  I'm frustrated because I can create 500 jobs; I've gone to the banks, I can't get a loan.  And I speak for all businesses in the United States.  (Applause.)  We are tired of dealing with banks.  And I don't understand -- and this is my question for you, is that I know you care, I know you're trying.  And I appreciate the pledge of $30 billion to small businesses.  But lending it to the banks to lend to us is not the answer.  It's just not.

What I suggest, and the question is, why can't you use the SBA just like you lent directly to Wall Street, you lent directly to the automakers, you lent directly to the banks -- why can't the government make small businesses available directly to us?  (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, this is a good question.  Look, first of all, you should be aware that we have increased SBA loans during the course of this year by 70 percent in some cases.  So some of the key programs for businesses like yours we have massively increased their lending.  And by the way, we've waived some of the fees and red tape that are associated with you getting a loan from the SBA.

Now, it's not enough.  Just -- I know you're shaking your head here.  I understand it's not enough because you still want a loan.  So -- but you need to -- I just want you to know, it's not like we haven't thought of why don't we use the SBA.  We have.  The challenge that we've got is, is that even SBA loans are generally run not by the SBA; the SBA essentially works with local banks, community banks, neighborhood banks, to process the loan.  And essentially the SBA underwrites the loan. 

And so the SBA does not have the infrastructure to go all across the country in every region and process loans to small businesses directly because they don't have enough people.  Somebody yelled, "Why not?"  The SBA doesn't have the staff to do it. 

Keep in mind, a small business loan of any sort, or a large business loan of any sort requires some sense of, all right, what's the business plan, what are your projected earnings, et cetera, et cetera.  And somebody has got to do that.  Now, if the SBA were to suddenly take over that entire function we'd have to stand up a massive bureaucracy -- a huge one.  And we'd have to train all those people and it would take too long, and you'd be frustrated -- why is it that this big government agency can't seem to run anything?

So what we've decided to do instead is to take $30 billion that was repaid by the banks and make that available under criteria that will encourage small banks to give those loans to you.  And if we do that effectively, we can potentially get that money out the door more quickly.

But I am absolutely sympathetic to what you're saying because I'm hearing it everywhere I go.  And I -- that's why I mentioned it last night in my speech.  You've got a lot of small business owners who are ready to grow, ready to hire, but they just can't get financing.  So we're going to use the SBA as one tool; this $30 billion is going to help.  Ultimately, though, the vast majority of small businesses, their loans are going to come from the private sector.  And we've got to get the private sector to think differently.

What happened here was that everybody was making loans without thinking of the risk at all.  They were just sending out money out the door; that's how a lot of overdevelopment happened here in Florida, it happened in Nevada, it happened in California -- because people were just saying, you know what, we're making money, we're not going to ask a lot of questions.  Suddenly the bottom falls out.  And the pendulum has shifted too far in the other direction so that even if you've got a good business plan, you've got a good model and you're making profits and a good product, now banks are reluctant to lend at all.

And what we're trying to do is to encourage them to get that happy medium where they're not taking such exorbitant risks that they threaten the entire system, but they're also open to enough risk that America's dynamic free enterprise system is actually able to work.

One role -- one aspect of this is also getting regulators who oversee the banks -- which aren't under my supervision; these are independent bank regulators -- getting them to at least take a closer look at their policies, because a lot of bankers will tell you they want to loan you the money but they're worried about -- they suffered all these losses because of some of the mortgage stuff going belly up.  So what they'll tell you is, I've got a bank regulator breathing down my neck making sure that I'm keeping my capital levels high enough.  And we're going to have to make some adjustments there.  But that's not something the administration can do directly.  We can just encourage these independent regulators to take a closer look at it.

I'm confident you're going to succeed, though.  And you can give maybe Reggie Love here your business card so we can find out about your terrific business.  (Applause.)

All right, I've got time only for -- I've only got time -- I've only got time for two more questions.  This young lady right here, she's been standing here a very long time.

Q    First, my 15-year-old son, Zach Cartwright (phonetic), wanted me to tell you that he is a big supporter of yours.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, tell Zach thank you so much. 

Q    Many families are having to withdraw money from their 401(k)s.  Once this occurs, in addition to taxes there's a 10 percent penalty assessed.  Since the withdrawals are taking place due to hardship, families don't always have the money to pay the 10 percent and the penalties.  The interest then accrues until the day full payment is made.  The IRS recently made headlines after giving tax breaks to Citigroup.  Several months ago people with offshore accounts were given amnesty.  My question is, why is the IRS coming after the middle class, creating more stress for us?  (Applause.)  And what is your plan to help resolve this?  And if Congress is unable to deal with the issue directly impacting the middle class, I'm happy to contribute my ideas.  (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, this is something that actually I personally experienced -- this was several years ago.  Michelle and I had some family emergencies -- this was when I was still working in a law firm.  I had a small retirement account set up and I ended up having to withdraw it and pay that 10 percent penalty, and it was no fun.  But it was what we had to do.  And fortunately we were young enough where we could absorb that hit.  A lot of families aren't in that position, if they've got a nest egg, to suddenly have to -- it's bad enough having to draw it down, but then also to have to pay taxes on top of it is really tough.

Now, the reason that policy is in place, obviously, is because you're getting that money tax-free, the idea being that you're going to actually use it for retirement.  And then if you're spending it early, before retirement, then you can imagine that a lot of people could potentially game the system by using these accounts to avoid taxes.  So I just want to show a little sympathy here for those who are trying to enforce the law -- they're not mean-spirited, they're just trying to -- they're working with the system that was set up.

I think you are raising a legitimate point, though.  And if I'm not mistaken we actually started looking at this, Joe, in our administration -- was to take a look at are there circumstances -- and the specific thing that we were thinking about was medical emergencies -- where people should not be penalized for it.  And I think that issuing blanket amnesties in all circumstances may not be possible.  But taking a look at certain narrow categories of emergencies in which these penalties could be waived is something that we have discussed and I think we could explore.  All right?  (Applause.)

Okay.  All right.  I got one more -- okay, everybody is pointing at this young man, so I'm going to call on this guy right here.  I think that's all his sisters were all pointing at him.  They're like, "Oh, call on my brother."  (Laughter.)

Q    All right, I'm Hector and I'm a student at UT.  (Applause.)  And my question is, last night you talked about repealing "don't ask, don't tell," and my question is what are you doing now to put in motion so that same-sex couples and homosexuals are treated as equal citizens of the United States, i.e., same-sex marriages and the thousand-plus benefits that heterosexual couples enjoy after marriage?  (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Look, as I said last night, my belief is, is that a basic principle in our Constitution is that if you're obeying the law, if you're following the rules, that you should be treated the same, regardless of who you are.  (Applause.)  I think that principle applies to gay and lesbian couples.  So at the federal level, one of the things that we're trying to do is to make sure that partnerships are recognized for purposes of benefits so that hospital visitation, for example, is something that is permitted; that Social Security benefits or pension benefits or others, that same-sex couples are recognized in all those circumstances.

I think that we've got to -- we actually have an opportunity of passing a law that's been introduced in Congress right now, and my hope is this year we can get it done, just for federal employees and federal workers.  A lot of companies, on their own, some of the best-run companies have adopted these same practices. I think it's the right thing to do and it makes sense for us to take a leadership role in ensuring that people are treated the same.  (Applause.) 

Look, if you are -- regardless of your personal opinions, the notion that somebody who's working really hard for 30 years can't take their death benefits and transfer them to the person that they love the most in the world and who has supported them all their lives, that just doesn't seem fair.  It doesn't seem right.  (Applause.)  And I think it's the right thing to do.

Okay, look, guys -- listen, everybody.  I've got to take off. 

AUDIENCE:  No!

THE PRESIDENT:  Wait, wait.  But I warned you guys I couldn't answer every question.  Let me just say in closing -- let me just say this in closing.  (Applause.)  Let me say this in closing -- hold on a second, hold on a second, hold on, hold on a second.

I want to say this.  Look, we've gone through a very difficult year.  But I have great optimism that we have begun to dig ourselves out of this hole.  In order for us to do it successfully, we're going to have to work together, we're going to have to listen to each other, we're going to have to be respectful of each other. 

So I want to end on mentioning something that I talked about last night.  You know, our political dialogue in this country has always been noisy and messy because we come from different places, we've got different ideas, different beliefs.  I understand all that.  But we're all Americans.  We all should anticipate that the other person, even if they disagree with us, has the best of intentions.  We don't have to call them names.  We don't have to demonize them.  And that's true whether you are a Democrat or a Republican, whether you are a conservative or a liberal, or an independent -- being respectful and listening to other people's point of views, and understanding that most of these issues are complicated. 

Look, let me take the example of health care.  Part of the reason why it's so easy to scare people about health care, even if they don't like it the way it is now, is because you've got doctors, you've got nurses, you've got hospitals, you've got insurance systems, you've got Medicaid, you've got Medicare, you've got the VA system -- all these systems constitute several trillion dollars, one-sixth of our economy.  Even if you come up with a great plan that lowers premiums and creates greater competition and ensures freedom for you to choose your doctor and is bringing down the deficit -- all the things that I've claimed -- and prevents insurance companies from abusing customers -- even if we do all that, there's going to be somebody out there in a $2 trillion system who's unhappy with something.  Right?

So they'll complain, well, you know, I'm a medical device manufacturer and if you reform the system that might force me to change how I sell my products; or there's going to be a doctor who says, well, you know what, right now I get charged this way and if you change how Medicare reimburses, then I might have to change my billing system and that's going to cost me a few thousand dollars and I don't like that. 

The reason I'm pointing this out is if we're going to do big things on energy, or health care, or infrastructure, then we're going to have some differences.  We've got to work them through.  Nothing that human beings do will be perfect.  But we shouldn't sort of assume that the other side is either heartless and doesn't care about sick people, or is some socialist communist who's trying to take over the health care system, or -- you know, we start getting into these caricatures of each other.  They're so damaging.  And, frankly, the political parties and the media haven't been helping.  They've been making it worse.  (Applause.)

I want to dial some of that back.  Let's start thinking of each other as Americans first, figuring out how we can help one another, figuring out how we can move this country forward.  I'm confident we'll do great.

Thank you, everybody.  God bless you.  Thank you.  (Applause.)

END
2:36 P.M. EST

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama, Vice President Biden to Announce $8 Billion for High-Speed Rail Projects Across the Country

Projects Will Help Create Construction Jobs, Revitalize U.S. Manufacturing Sector

Tampa, FL – President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden will today announce that the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) is awarding $8 billion to states across the country to develop America’s first nationwide program of high-speed intercity passenger rail service.  Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), these dollars represent an historic investment in the country’s transportation infrastructure, which will help create jobs and transform travel in America.  The announcement is one of a number of job initiatives the President will lay out in the coming weeks that follow up on the continued commitment to job creation he discussed in last night’s State of the Union Address.  A full list of the awards can be viewed HERE

“Through the Recovery Act, we are making the largest investment in infrastructure since the Interstate Highway System was created, putting Americans to work rebuilding our roads, bridges, and waterways for the future,” said President Obama. “That investment is how we can break ground across the country, putting people to work building high-speed rail lines, because there’s no reason why Europe or China should have the fastest trains when we can build them right here in America.”

“By investing in high speed rail, we’re doing so many good things for our country at the same time,” said Vice President Biden.  We’re creating good construction and manufacturing jobs in the near-term; we’re spurring economic development in the future; we’re making our communities more livable—and we’re doing it all while decreasing America’s environmental impact and increasing America’s ability to compete in the world.”

Today’s awards will serve as a down-payment on developing or laying the groundwork for 13 new, large-scale high-speed rail corridors across the country.  The major corridors are part of a total of 31 states receiving investments, including smaller projects and planning work that will help lay the groundwork for future high-speed intercity rail service.   The grants are not only expected to have an up-front job and economic impact, but help spur economic growth in communities across the country, provide faster and more energy-efficient means of travel, and establish a new industry in the U.S. that provides stable, well-paid jobs. 

This historic $8 billion investment is expected to create or save tens of thousands of jobs over time in areas like track-laying, manufacturing, planning and engineering, and rail maintenance and operations.  Over 30 rail manufacturers, both domestic and foreign, have agreed to establish or expand their base of operations in the United States if they are hired to build America’s next generation high-speed rail lines – a commitment the Administration secured to help ensure new jobs are created here at home.

“The President’s bold vision for high-speed rail is a game changer,” said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “It’s not only going to create good jobs and reinvigorate our manufacturing base, it’s also going to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and help create livable communities.  I have no doubt that building the next generation of rail service in this country will help change our society for the better.”

The majority of the dollars announced today will go toward developing new, large-scale high-speed rail programs.  This includes projects in Florida, which is receiving up to $1.25 billion to develop a new high-speed rail corridor between Tampa and Orlando with trains running up to 168 miles per hour, and in California, which is receiving up to $2.25 billion for its planned project to connect Los Angeles to San Francisco and points in between with trains running up to 220 miles per hour.

In April 2009, the Administration released a long-term plan for high speed rail in America. In addition to the $8 billion awarded today, the plan also included $1 billion a year for five years in the federal budget as a down payment to jump-start the program.  Applicants submitted over $55 billion in project proposals for the initial $8 billion in funds awarded today. 

Obama Administration officials are traveling across the country this week to announce funding for the high speed rail projects and discuss how this investment will create local jobs and rebuild the economy.  Today, EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson will travel to Durham, North Carolina, Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis will visit Columbus, Ohio and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan will be in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood will hold an event in Washington, DC, Executive Director of the White House Council on Auto Communities and Workers Ed Montgomery will visit St. Louis, Missouri and Federal Railroad Administrator Joseph C. Szabo will be in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  On Friday, a senior Department of Transportation official will travel to California and FRA Administrator Szabo will hold an event in Chicago, Illinois.  

For further details on the major corridor projects, click here:

To learn more about the story of the Recovery Act, visit www.WhiteHouse.gov/Recovery.  To follow Recovery Act dollars, visit www.Recovery.gov

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Presidente Obama y Vicepresidente Biden anuncian detalles sobre programas para familias de clase media

Conversación adelanta detalles de un tema clave en el Discurso sobre el Estado de la Nación

Washington, DC – Hoy, el Presidente Barack Obama y el Vicepresidente Joe Biden tuvieron una reunión del Grupo de Trabajo sobre la Clase Media (Middle Class Task Force), en la que dieron información sobre inversiones clave para las familias de clase media. La conversación de hoy adelanta detalles de un tema clave en el Discurso del Presidente sobre el Estado de la Nación, que incluye generar buenos empleos, hacerle frente al déficit, cambiar Washington y luchar por las familias de clase media.
 
El Presidente Obama dijo, “Estamos luchando todos los días para hacer que los estadounidenses vuelvan a trabajar, generar buenos empleos y darle mayor solidez a nuestra economía a largo plazo. Las medidas adicionales presentadas hoy se centran en aliviar la carga de las familias de clase media que están pasando apuros en esta economía y proporcionarles la ayuda que necesitan para salir adelante”.

“Todos los días, las familias de clase media van a trabajar y ayudan a forjar un gran país. Durante todo el año, nuestro Grupo de Trabajo ha estado oyendo que tienen dificultades por los costos que aumentan vertiginosamente y los presupuestos familiares que no alcanzan. Estos programas de sentido común ayudarán a estas familias a hacerles frente a dichos desafíos”, afirmó el Vicepresidente Biden.

Tras recorrer el país el año pasado y hablar con familias, proveedores de atención de salud, educadores, estudiantes, personas mayores, como también expertos y personas que dictan la política, el Vicepresidente Joe Biden, quien preside el Grupo de Trabajo de la Casa Blanca sobre la Clase Media, se sumó al Presidente Obama para anunciar varias recomendaciones de dicho grupo de trabajo. Estos programas, que han surgido de las reuniones, viajes y labor del Grupo de Trabajo, tienen como propósito ayudar a las familias de clase media a poder pagar el costo cada vez más alto del cuidado de niños y el cuidado de sus familiares mayores, además de afrontar el desafío de ahorrar para la jubilación y pagar la matrícula universitaria de sus hijos.

Esta semana se cumple un año de la incepción del Grupo de Trabajo sobre la Clase Media, el cual ha tenido 11 reuniones en todo el país y en la Casa Blanca. En dichas reuniones, el Vicepresidente Biden oyó los comentarios de padres que están lidiando con el costo del cuidado de niños; estudiantes que se gradúan de la universidad sumamente endeudados; hijos de personas mayores que pasan apuros para poder atenderlas, y trabajadores que apenas pueden realizar sus pagos hipotecarios, y mucho menos, ahorrar para la jubilación.

Como resultado de estas reuniones, conversaciones y comentarios provenientes de todo el país, el Vicepresidente y el Grupo de Trabajo propondrán varios programas para ayudar a las familias de clase media:

1. Aumentar a casi el doble el crédito tributario por cuidado de hijos y dependientes que reciben las familias de clase media que ganan menos de $85,000 al año. Esto se logra al aumentar la tasa del crédito tributario de 20% a 35% para gastos que cumplen con los requisitos. El valor del crédito tributario aumenta a casi el doble en el caso de las familias que ganan menos de $85,000 al año, y cada familia que gana menos de $115,000 verá un aumento en el crédito tributario.
Además, con el fin de ayudar a las familias que están teniendo dificultad para pasar a ser parte de la clase media, la Administración otorgará un aumento de $1,600 millones en fondos para cuidado de niños, el mayor aumento anual en los últimos 20 años, a fin de ayudar a 235,000 niños adicionales.
2. Limitar los pagos de préstamos estudiantiles federales a 10 por ciento de sus ingresos por encima de un estipendio básico. Esto reducirá los pagos de cientos de miles de estudiantes que están teniendo dificultad para que les alcance el dinero tras graduarse de la universidad.
3. Crear un sistema de depósito automático en IRAs en el centro de trabajo, que requiera que todos los empleadores ofrezcan a sus empleados la opción de inscribirse para una IRA de depósitos directos.
4. Aumentar los créditos tributarios a fin de que haya relación con los ahorros para la jubilación y promulgar nuevas medidas con el objeto de proteger los ahorros para la jubilación, lo que facilitará que las familias planeen para la jubilación.
5. Aumentar el apoyo a familias que deben arreglárselas para trabajar a la vez que cuidan a familiares mayores, al ayudarlas a atender sus múltiples responsabilidades y permitir que las personas mayores vivan en la comunidad durante el mayor tiempo posible.

El informe final del Grupo de Trabajo y todas sus recomendaciones se darán a conocer en febrero.

Se incluye información adicional sobre estos programas del Trabajo sobre la Clase Media en LA HOJA INFORMATIVA

Acerca del Grupo de Trabajo sobre la Clase Media: El Grupo de Trabajo, presidido por el Vicepresidente Joe Biden, es un grupo de altos funcionarios del gobierno que dictan política, a quienes se les ha encargado la misión de formular medidas políticas dirigidas a mejorar el estándar de vida de las familias trabajadoras de clase media en Estados Unidos.

Desde su incepción el 30 de enero, 2009, el Grupo de Trabajo sobre la Clase Media ha tenido 11 reuniones en todo el país y en la Casa Blanca:
• 27 de febrero, 2009: Empleos verdes (Filadelfia, PA)
• 17 de marzo, 2009: Ley para la Recuperación y Reinversión de Estados Unidos y familias de clase media (St. Cloud, MN)
• 17 de abril, 2009: Capacidad de financiación de estudios universitarios (St. Louis, MO)
• 26 de mayo, 2009: Empleos verdes (Denver, CO)
• 23 de junio, 2009: Manufactura en el siglo XXI (Perrysburg, OH)
• 10 de julio, 2009: Mesa redonda sobre la reforma de salud (Casa Blanca)
• 16 de julio, 2009: AARP/Conversación sobre la reforma del cuidado de salud (Arlington, Virginia)
• 9 de septiembre, 2009: Acceso a la universidad (Syracuse, NY)
• 19 de octubre, 2009: Recuperación de la clase media por medio de remodelaciones inmobiliarias (Casa Blanca)
• 5 de noviembre, 2009: Mesa redonda con expertos en política (Washington, DC)
• 16 de diciembre, 2009: Mesa redonda con líderes del sector industrial (Casa Blanca)

Son miembros del Grupo de Trabajo: El Vicepresidente Biden, presidente; los secretarios de Trabajo, Salud y Servicios Humanos, Educación, Energía, Tesoro, Comercio, Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano, Transporte y Agricultura; la administradora de la Agencia de Protección Ambiental; como también los directores del Consejo Económico Nacional, la Oficina de Administración y Presupuesto, el Consejo de Política Nacional y la presidenta del Consejo de Asesores Económicos.

Para leer los informes del Grupo de Trabajo sobre la Clase Media que se han dado a conocer, sírvase visitar: www.WhiteHouse.Gov/AStrongMiddleClass.
 

The President and Vice President Together on Easing Burdens for the Middle Class

Ed. Note: Don't miss the new report (pdf) from the Commerce Department's Economics and Statistics Administration issued for the Middle Class Task Force: "Middle Class in America."

President Obama and Vice President Biden held a Middle Class Task Force meeting during which they discussed key initiatives for middle class families. Topics of discussion previewed the major themes of the President's State of the Union address, which include creating good jobs, addressing the deficit, changing Washington, and fighting for middle class families.

After travelling across the country and hearing from struggling parents, students, and workers, Vice President Biden and the Task Force proposed several policy initiatives to help middle class families, including:

  • Nearly doubling the child and dependent care tax credit for families making under $85,000
  • Limiting a student's federal loan payments to 10 percent of his/her income
  • Creating a system of automatic workplace IRAs
  • Expanding tax credits to match retirement savings
  • Expanding support for families balancing work while caring for elderly relatives

Vice President Biden, emphasizing first and foremost that getting jobs back on track was the highest priority, explained why these measures are also of tremendous importance in remarks after the meeting: "We give them the tools, the flexibility, even just a chance to succeed, we're not only going to rebuild this economy, we're going to offer millions of Americans to build a future that they hope and still believe is available to them."

Vice President Biden at Middle Class Task Force Year One Wrap-up

Vice President Joe Biden discusses the administration’s economic initiatives for struggling middle class families at a meeting of the Middle Class Task Force at the White House January 25, 2010. (Official White House Photo by Lawrence Jackson)

President Obama closed his remarks with the over-arching principle guiding his Administration during these times:

None of these steps alone will solve all the challenges facing the middle class. Joe understands that; so do I. So do all my members of the Cabinet and our economic team. But hopefully some of these steps will reestablish some of the security that's slipped away in recent years. Because in the end, that's how Joe and I measure progress -- not by how the markets are doing, but by how the American people are doing. It's about whether they see some progress in their own lives.

So we're going to keep fighting to rebuild our economy so that hard work is once again rewarded, wages and incomes are once again rising, and the middle class is once again growing. And above all, we're going to keep fighting to renew the American Dream and keep it alive -- not just in our time, but for all time.

The Task Force's final report will be released in February, in the meantime read the full transcript of the meeting or the White House background for more information.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President and Vice President at Middle Class Task Force Meeting

Room 430, Eisenhower Executive Office Building

11:47 A.M. EST

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Hey, folks.  A year ago when President Obama established the Middle Class Task Force and asked me to chair it -- and I might add, we were only in office I think two days, Melody, when he set up this Middle Class Task Force -- because as we campaigned around the country, he made it clear that we were going to be sure that as we grew this economy, the middle class was not left behind as they had been the previous 10 to 12 years.  And as we move from recession to recovery, our focus is the middle class.

Today -- today, living a quality middle class life starts, as it always has, with a good-paying job.  And by job, we're not talking about merely a paycheck; it's more than a paycheck.  And we're talking about dignity, we're talking about security.  We're talking about knowing your pension is safe, your health insurance is reliable, your elderly parents and your children are going to be cared for, your neighborhood is safe, there's decent schools, and that your kids are going to be able to grow up and if they desire and you desire, be able to attend college.  It's the old-fashioned notion of American Dream.  I mean, it sounds corny, but that's literally what it is.

And the President -- and you and I -- have long believed that you can't have a strong America without a growing middle class.  It's that simple.  It's that basic.  And right now, the middle class is nowhere near as strong as it needs to be.

So next month, the Middle Class Task Force is going to deliver its final report -- not final, its year-end report to the President.  And this afternoon, we're spotlighting some of the items in that report that the President is going to be including in the upcoming budget.  And these include, first of all, an expansion of the child tax credit.  Since 2000, child care costs have grown significantly faster than inflation and twice as fast -- twice as fast as the median income of families with children.  And that's why we're asking Congress to nearly double the credit for middle class families with incomes up to $85,000 and increase the credit for nearly every family making under $115,000.

Secondly, the President is going to be proposing an increase in funding for child care and -- the so-called Child Care and Development Fund to serve an additional 235,000 children in America.  This is going to help working parents who are struggling to lift their families into the middle class.

And, thirdly, elder care.  I mean, we all -- we're a generation -- the so-called baby boom generation is becoming very knowledgeable about elder care and the need to help middle class families who are caring for aging parents and relatives.  People like Jill and me are part of what's called that "sandwich" generation.  And I make a very good salary, but just going through caring for my mother the last year and a half, and before that, my father, who, thank God, lived to ripe old ages -- it was -- it's not easy.  And I -- we sit there -- when my brother and sister and I -- brothers and sister and I divided up the cost of the care, we were able to do that, no complaints, not a problem.  But I thought to myself, my lord, what would it be like -- a couple with two kids making $85,000 a year, even $125,000 a year?  How do they do it?

     So today we're proposing more support for caregivers by providing counseling, training, help with transportation, and temporary respite care when they just need a break or they have to work -- which most all of them do.

     This is going to allow nearly 200,000 people who are now balancing work and providing care to an elderly relative to be served, and 3 million hours of respite care are going to be provided.

     The fourth thing is we're going to be strengthening the income-based repayment program for student loans -- fancy way of saying a lot of kids and families graduate with significant loan responsibility and literally -- literally are left with very few options.  They've got to go out and get the highest-paying job they can, maybe in an area they had no intention of working in, just to pay back the loan.

Today the average debt of a graduating senior from college -- now, listen -- the average debt -- people of my generation -- the average debt is $23,000.  That is literally $2,000 more than my first house cost.  But in any standard, it's a lot of money -- average debt.  Some are graduating with a great deal more debt than that.

So our proposal ensures that Federal Student Loan payments for overburdened borrowers are never more than 10 percent of their income -- a change like that makes a real difference for a kid just out of school.  For someone who earns 30,000 bucks and owes $20,000 in loans, this would lower his or her monthly
payment from $228 a month under the standard repayment plan to $115 a month.  People who have to budget every day just to get by, they understand that's a big difference.  That's a big difference.

     And finally, we want to strengthen retirement security, which we talked about with the Secretary of Treasury, for American workers.  Too many working people in this country don't have a good option to save their hard-earned money for retirement.  And too many of those who do save are finding that at the end of the day they don't have enough saved to afford the basic retirement they deserve.

     That's why we're proposing to give more workers better access to retirement plans at work, to match retirement savings for middle class Americans so they can save more, and to strengthen and update the 401(k) regulations so that they can save with greater confidence.

     This means establishing an automatic individual retirement account.  Today, 78 million Americans, working Americans --roughly half the workforce -- don't have employer-based retirement plans anymore.  Our proposal lays the groundwork for an employer who do not currently offer retirement plans to enroll their employees in direct deposit IRAs.  We found it's a simple proposition -- when you do that, people, if you're automatically enrolled, you can opt out.  But they save a great deal more.  And it just puts in place the requirement of the employer to provide that access out of their paycheck to go into an IRA.  It's a simple proposition, but it's a big deal.

     It also means simplifying and expanding the saver's credit, which helped working families save for retirement by providing a 50 percent match on the first $1,000 of retirement savings.  So if you put a thousand bucks into a retirement account, your government is going to add even more -- another $500.  It's an incentive, but long term it saves the government a lot more money than the 500 hundred bucks put in if in fact we find we have a generation that's able to care for themselves and not have to look to the government to provide some basic needs they need.  This will not only help build up a nest egg for existing savers, but it's going to encourage workers who currently have no retirement accounts to start to save.

     Taken together, these and other middle class proposals we believe will go a long way toward easing the strain on working families, allowing them to save more today to get further ahead tomorrow.  Because if we give a working man and woman in this country -- and first of all, we make sure they've got good jobs -- if we give them an opportunity, they're the most productive workers in the world.  We give them the tools, the flexibility, even just a chance to succeed, we're not only going to rebuild this economy, we're going to offer millions of Americans to build a future that they hope and still believe is available to them.

     So I wanted to thank all you guys.  You've been meeting with me on a regular basis.  I've been a little bit of a pain in the neck.  I know you have urgent, urgent, urgent things that were left on our plate -- placed on our plate when we took office.  And one of the things you've done -- and I thank you for it -- when the President set up this task force is you have not taken your eye off the ball, you have serious people inside each of your agencies doing nothing every day but getting up, putting both feet on the floor, and saying, what are we going to do inside my shop that's going to ease the burden and increase the opportunity for people to get into the middle class and stay in.

     So, Mr. President -- I think the President is here -- I'd like to invite him to come out because we owe the President a great deal for focusing this issue throughout the campaign and the first thing you did when you came to office.  Mr. President, it's an honor working with you on this.

     THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  Thank you, Joe.  Hey, guys, everybody have a seat -- have a seat.

Well, I wanted to stop by to comment on all the great work that the Middle Class Task Force is doing.  And you've just seen why Joe is the right person to do it.  No one brings to the table the same combination of personal experience and substantive expertise.  He's come a long way, and achieved incredible things along the ride, but he's never forgotten where he came from and his roots as a working-class kid from Scranton.  He's devoted his life to making the American Dream a reality for everyone –- because he's lived it.

Now, we all know what that American Dream is.  It's the idea that in America we can make of our lives what we will.  It's the idea that if you work hard and live up to your responsibilities, you can get ahead -– and enjoy some of the basic guarantees in life:  A good job that pays a good wage, health care that'll be there when you get sick, a secure retirement even if you're not rich, an education that will give our kids a better life than we had.  They're very simple ideas.  But they're the ideas that are at the heart of our middle class –- the middle class that made the 20th century the American Century.

Unfortunately, the middle class has been under assault for a long time.  Too many Americans have known their own painful recessions long before any economist declared that there was a recession.  We've just come through what was one of the most difficult decades the middle class has ever faced -– a decade in which median income fell and our economy lost about as many jobs as it gained.

For two years, Joe and I traveled this country and we heard stories that are all too familiar:  stories of Americans barely able to stay afloat despite working harder and harder for less; premiums that were doubling, tuition fees that were rising almost as fast; savings being used up, retirements put off, dreams put on hold.  That was all before the middle class got pounded by the full fury of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

Their stories are why Joe and I ran for this office:  to reverse those trends, to fight for the middle class, to make sure working families have a voice in the White House, and to do everything within our power to make sure they don't just survive the crisis, but again they can thrive.

And when we walked through these doors last year our first and most urgent task was to rescue our economy, to give immediate relief to those who were hurt by its downturn, but also to rebuild it on a new, stronger foundation for job creation.  So we helped state and local governments keep cops and firefighters and teachers on the job, helping to plug their budgets.  We invested in areas with the most potential for job growth both immediate and lasting –- in our infrastructure, in science and technology, in education, in clean energy.  And these steps have saved or created about 2 million jobs so far.

But more than 7 million have been lost as a consequence of this recession –- an epidemic that demands our relentless and sustained response.  Now, last month the House passed a new jobs bill.  The Senate, as we speak, is hard at work developing its own job creation package.  Creating good, sustainable jobs is the single most important thing we can do to rebuild the middle class -– and I won't rest until we're doing just that.

But we also need to reverse the overall erosion in middle class security so that when this economy does come back, working Americans are free to pursue their dreams again.  There are a variety of immediate steps we can take to do just that -– steps we're poised to begin taking in the budget that I'll put forward next week.

Joe already spoke about some of these proposals in detail -– proposals that make it a bit easier for families to get by, for students to get ahead, and for workers to retire.  To make balancing work and family more realistic, we'll make it easier to care for children and aging loved ones.  To make college more affordable, we'll make it easier for students to pay back their loans, and forgive their debt earlier if they choose a career in public service.  And to make retirement more secure, we're going to make it easier to save through the workplace.

Joe and I are going to keep on fighting for what matters to middle class families:  An education that gives our kids a chance in life; new, clean energy economy that generates the good jobs of the future; meaningful financial reform that protect consumers; and health reform that prohibits the worst practices of the insurance industry and restores some stability and peace of mind for middle class families.

None of these steps alone will solve all the challenges facing the middle class.  Joe understands that; so do I.  So do all my members of the Cabinet and our economic team.  But hopefully some of these steps will reestablish some of the security that's slipped away in recent years.  Because in the end, that's how Joe and I measure progress -- not by how the markets are doing, but by how the American people are doing. It's about whether they see some progress in their own lives.

So we're going to keep fighting to rebuild our economy so that hard work is once again rewarded, wages and incomes are once again rising, and the middle class is once again growing.  And above all, we're going to keep fighting to renew the American Dream and keep it alive -- not just in our time, but for all time.

So, again, to our team -- and that includes, by the way, the folks over here -- thank you for the great work that you've done.  I'm excited about a lot of the proposals that you've come up with.  And we expect that we're going to be able to get some of these critical initiatives passed soon so that folks can get some help right away.

Thank you very much.  (Applause.)

END
12:05 P.M. EST

Key Investments for Middle-Class Families

January 25, 2010 | 43:27 | Public Domain

President Obama and Vice President Biden address a meeting of the Middle Class Task Force and lay out a series of proposals and initiatives designed to create jobs, strengthen the economy, and ease the burden for middle-class families.

Download mp4 (541MB) | mp3 (40MB)

Read the Transcript

Remarks by the President and Vice President at Middle Class Task Force Meeting

11:47 A.M. EST

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Hey, folks.  A year ago when President Obama established the Middle Class Task Force and asked me to chair it -- and I might add, we were only in office I think two days, Melody, when he set up this Middle Class Task Force -- because as we campaigned around the country, he made it clear that we were going to be sure that as we grew this economy, the middle class was not left behind as they had been the previous 10 to 12 years.  And as we move from recession to recovery, our focus is the middle class.

Today -- today, living a quality middle class life starts, as it always has, with a good-paying job.  And by job, we're not talking about merely a paycheck; it's more than a paycheck.  And we're talking about dignity, we're talking about security.  We're talking about knowing your pension is safe, your health insurance is reliable, your elderly parents and your children are going to be cared for, your neighborhood is safe, there's decent schools, and that your kids are going to be able to grow up and if they desire and you desire, be able to attend college.  It's the old-fashioned notion of American Dream.  I mean, it sounds corny, but that's literally what it is.

And the President -- and you and I -- have long believed that you can't have a strong America without a growing middle class.  It's that simple.  It's that basic.  And right now, the middle class is nowhere near as strong as it needs to be.

So next month, the Middle Class Task Force is going to deliver its final report -- not final, its year-end report to the President.  And this afternoon, we're spotlighting some of the items in that report that the President is going to be including in the upcoming budget.  And these include, first of all, an expansion of the child tax credit.  Since 2000, child care costs have grown significantly faster than inflation and twice as fast -- twice as fast as the median income of families with children.  And that's why we're asking Congress to nearly double the credit for middle class families with incomes up to $85,000 and increase the credit for nearly every family making under $115,000.

Secondly, the President is going to be proposing an increase in funding for child care and -- the so-called Child Care and Development Fund to serve an additional 235,000 children in America.  This is going to help working parents who are struggling to lift their families into the middle class.

And, thirdly, elder care.  I mean, we all -- we're a generation -- the so-called baby boom generation is becoming very knowledgeable about elder care and the need to help middle class families who are caring for aging parents and relatives.  People like Jill and me are part of what's called that "sandwich" generation.  And I make a very good salary, but just going through caring for my mother the last year and a half, and before that, my father, who, thank God, lived to ripe old ages -- it was -- it's not easy.  And I -- we sit there -- when my brother and sister and I -- brothers and sister and I divided up the cost of the care, we were able to do that, no complaints, not a problem.  But I thought to myself, my lord, what would it be like -- a couple with two kids making $85,000 a year, even $125,000 a year?  How do they do it?

     So today we're proposing more support for caregivers by providing counseling, training, help with transportation, and temporary respite care when they just need a break or they have to work -- which most all of them do.

     This is going to allow nearly 200,000 people who are now balancing work and providing care to an elderly relative to be served, and 3 million hours of respite care are going to be provided.

     The fourth thing is we're going to be strengthening the income-based repayment program for student loans -- fancy way of saying a lot of kids and families graduate with significant loan responsibility and literally -- literally are left with very few options.  They've got to go out and get the highest-paying job they can, maybe in an area they had no intention of working in, just to pay back the loan.

Today the average debt of a graduating senior from college -- now, listen -- the average debt -- people of my generation -- the average debt is $23,000.  That is literally $2,000 more than my first house cost.  But in any standard, it's a lot of money -- average debt.  Some are graduating with a great deal more debt than that.

So our proposal ensures that Federal Student Loan payments for overburdened borrowers are never more than 10 percent of their income -- a change like that makes a real difference for a kid just out of school.  For someone who earns 30,000 bucks and owes $20,000 in loans, this would lower his or her monthly
payment from $228 a month under the standard repayment plan to $115 a month.  People who have to budget every day just to get by, they understand that's a big difference.  That's a big difference.

     And finally, we want to strengthen retirement security, which we talked about with the Secretary of Treasury, for American workers.  Too many working people in this country don't have a good option to save their hard-earned money for retirement.  And too many of those who do save are finding that at the end of the day they don't have enough saved to afford the basic retirement they deserve.

     That's why we're proposing to give more workers better access to retirement plans at work, to match retirement savings for middle class Americans so they can save more, and to strengthen and update the 401(k) regulations so that they can save with greater confidence.

     This means establishing an automatic individual retirement account.  Today, 78 million Americans, working Americans --roughly half the workforce -- don't have employer-based retirement plans anymore.  Our proposal lays the groundwork for an employer who do not currently offer retirement plans to enroll their employees in direct deposit IRAs.  We found it's a simple proposition -- when you do that, people, if you're automatically enrolled, you can opt out.  But they save a great deal more.  And it just puts in place the requirement of the employer to provide that access out of their paycheck to go into an IRA.  It's a simple proposition, but it's a big deal.

     It also means simplifying and expanding the saver's credit, which helped working families save for retirement by providing a 50 percent match on the first $1,000 of retirement savings.  So if you put a thousand bucks into a retirement account, your government is going to add even more -- another $500.  It's an incentive, but long term it saves the government a lot more money than the 500 hundred bucks put in if in fact we find we have a generation that's able to care for themselves and not have to look to the government to provide some basic needs they need.  This will not only help build up a nest egg for existing savers, but it's going to encourage workers who currently have no retirement accounts to start to save.

     Taken together, these and other middle class proposals we believe will go a long way toward easing the strain on working families, allowing them to save more today to get further ahead tomorrow.  Because if we give a working man and woman in this country -- and first of all, we make sure they've got good jobs -- if we give them an opportunity, they're the most productive workers in the world.  We give them the tools, the flexibility, even just a chance to succeed, we're not only going to rebuild this economy, we're going to offer millions of Americans to build a future that they hope and still believe is available to them.

     So I wanted to thank all you guys.  You've been meeting with me on a regular basis.  I've been a little bit of a pain in the neck.  I know you have urgent, urgent, urgent things that were left on our plate -- placed on our plate when we took office.  And one of the things you've done -- and I thank you for it -- when the President set up this task force is you have not taken your eye off the ball, you have serious people inside each of your agencies doing nothing every day but getting up, putting both feet on the floor, and saying, what are we going to do inside my shop that's going to ease the burden and increase the opportunity for people to get into the middle class and stay in.

     So, Mr. President -- I think the President is here -- I'd like to invite him to come out because we owe the President a great deal for focusing this issue throughout the campaign and the first thing you did when you came to office.  Mr. President, it's an honor working with you on this.

     THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  Thank you, Joe.  Hey, guys, everybody have a seat -- have a seat.

Well, I wanted to stop by to comment on all the great work that the Middle Class Task Force is doing.  And you've just seen why Joe is the right person to do it.  No one brings to the table the same combination of personal experience and substantive expertise.  He's come a long way, and achieved incredible things along the ride, but he's never forgotten where he came from and his roots as a working-class kid from Scranton.  He's devoted his life to making the American Dream a reality for everyone –- because he's lived it.

Now, we all know what that American Dream is.  It's the idea that in America we can make of our lives what we will.  It's the idea that if you work hard and live up to your responsibilities, you can get ahead -– and enjoy some of the basic guarantees in life:  A good job that pays a good wage, health care that'll be there when you get sick, a secure retirement even if you're not rich, an education that will give our kids a better life than we had.  They're very simple ideas.  But they're the ideas that are at the heart of our middle class –- the middle class that made the 20th century the American Century.

Unfortunately, the middle class has been under assault for a long time.  Too many Americans have known their own painful recessions long before any economist declared that there was a recession.  We've just come through what was one of the most difficult decades the middle class has ever faced -– a decade in which median income fell and our economy lost about as many jobs as it gained.

For two years, Joe and I traveled this country and we heard stories that are all too familiar:  stories of Americans barely able to stay afloat despite working harder and harder for less; premiums that were doubling, tuition fees that were rising almost as fast; savings being used up, retirements put off, dreams put on hold.  That was all before the middle class got pounded by the full fury of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

Their stories are why Joe and I ran for this office:  to reverse those trends, to fight for the middle class, to make sure working families have a voice in the White House, and to do everything within our power to make sure they don't just survive the crisis, but again they can thrive.

And when we walked through these doors last year our first and most urgent task was to rescue our economy, to give immediate relief to those who were hurt by its downturn, but also to rebuild it on a new, stronger foundation for job creation.  So we helped state and local governments keep cops and firefighters and teachers on the job, helping to plug their budgets.  We invested in areas with the most potential for job growth both immediate and lasting –- in our infrastructure, in science and technology, in education, in clean energy.  And these steps have saved or created about 2 million jobs so far.

But more than 7 million have been lost as a consequence of this recession –- an epidemic that demands our relentless and sustained response.  Now, last month the House passed a new jobs bill.  The Senate, as we speak, is hard at work developing its own job creation package.  Creating good, sustainable jobs is the single most important thing we can do to rebuild the middle class -– and I won't rest until we're doing just that.

But we also need to reverse the overall erosion in middle class security so that when this economy does come back, working Americans are free to pursue their dreams again.  There are a variety of immediate steps we can take to do just that -– steps we're poised to begin taking in the budget that I'll put forward next week.

Joe already spoke about some of these proposals in detail -– proposals that make it a bit easier for families to get by, for students to get ahead, and for workers to retire.  To make balancing work and family more realistic, we'll make it easier to care for children and aging loved ones.  To make college more affordable, we'll make it easier for students to pay back their loans, and forgive their debt earlier if they choose a career in public service.  And to make retirement more secure, we're going to make it easier to save through the workplace.

Joe and I are going to keep on fighting for what matters to middle class families:  An education that gives our kids a chance in life; new, clean energy economy that generates the good jobs of the future; meaningful financial reform that protect consumers; and health reform that prohibits the worst practices of the insurance industry and restores some stability and peace of mind for middle class families.

None of these steps alone will solve all the challenges facing the middle class.  Joe understands that; so do I.  So do all my members of the Cabinet and our economic team.  But hopefully some of these steps will reestablish some of the security that's slipped away in recent years.  Because in the end, that's how Joe and I measure progress -- not by how the markets are doing, but by how the American people are doing. It's about whether they see some progress in their own lives.

So we're going to keep fighting to rebuild our economy so that hard work is once again rewarded, wages and incomes are once again rising, and the middle class is once again growing.  And above all, we're going to keep fighting to renew the American Dream and keep it alive -- not just in our time, but for all time.

So, again, to our team -- and that includes, by the way, the folks over here -- thank you for the great work that you've done.  I'm excited about a lot of the proposals that you've come up with.  And we expect that we're going to be able to get some of these critical initiatives passed soon so that folks can get some help right away.

Thank you very much.  (Applause.)

END
12:05 P.M. EST

Close Transcript

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama and Vice President Biden Preview Initiatives for Middle Class Families

Discussion Previews a Key Theme for State of the Union Address

Washington, DC – Today, President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden will hold a meeting of the Middle Class Task Force, where they will lay out key investments for middle class families.  Today’s discussion will preview one of the key themes of the President’s State of the Union address, which include creating good jobs, addressing the deficit, changing Washington, and fighting for middle class families.

President Obama said, “We are fighting every single day to put Americans back to work, create good jobs, and strengthen our economy for the long-term. The additional steps laid out today focus on easing the burdens on middle class families who are struggling in this economy, and providing the help they need to get ahead.”

“Every day, middle class families go to work and help make this country great.  For a year, our Task Force has been hearing that they are struggling with soaring costs and squeezed family budgets.  These common sense initiatives will help these families cope with these challenges,” said Vice President Biden.

After traveling across the country the past year talking with families, caregivers, educators, students, seniors, as well as policy makers and experts, Chair of the White House Task Force on Middle Class Families Vice President Joe Biden will join President Obama to announce several recommendations of the Task Force.   These initiatives, borne out of the meetings, travel and work of the Task Force, are aimed at helping middle class families afford soaring child care costs; care for their aging relatives; cope with the challenge of saving for retirement; and pay for their children’s college tuition. 

Since its creation one year ago this week, the Middle Class Task Force has held 11 meetings around the country and at the White House.  At these meetings, Vice President Biden heard from parents who were grappling with the costs of child care; students coming out of college drowning in debt; children of elderly relatives struggling to care for them; and workers who were barely able to pay their mortgage, much less save for retirement. 

As a result of these meetings, conversations and feedback from around the country, the Vice President and the Task Force will propose several policy initiatives to help middle class families:

  1. Nearly Doubling the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit for middle class families making under $85,000 a year.  This is accomplished by increasing their tax credit rate from 20% to 35% of qualifying expenses.  The value of the tax credit nearly doubles for all families making under $85,000 a year, and every family that makes under $115,000 will see their tax credit increase.  
    Additionally, for families struggling to join the middle class, the administration will provide a $1.6 billion increase in child care funding, the largest one-year increase in 20 years, to help an additional 235,000 children.
  2. Limiting a student’s federal loan payments to 10 percent of his or her income above a basic living allowance. This will lower payments for hundreds of thousands of students, who are struggling to make ends meet coming out of college. 
  3. Creating a system of automatic workplace IRAs, requiring all employers to give the option for employees to enroll in a direct-deposit IRA.
  4. Expanding tax credits to match retirement savings and enacting new safeguards to protect retirement savings, making it easier for families to plan for retirement.
  5. Expanding support for families balancing work with caring for elderly relatives, helping them manage their multiple responsibilities and allowing seniors to live in the community for as long as possible.

The Task Force’s final report, and full recommendations, will be released in February.

Additional information about these Middle Class Task Force initiatives is included in the attached fact sheet

About the Middle Class Task Force: The Task Force, Chaired by Vice President Joe Biden, is a group of top-level administration policy makers, charged with the mission of focusing on developing policies aimed at raising the living standards of middle-class, working families in America.

Since its creation on January 30, 2009, the Middle Class Task Force has held 11 meetings around the country and at the White House:

  • February 27, 2009: Green Jobs (Philadelphia, PA)
  • March 17, 2009: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and Middle Class Families (St. Cloud, MN)
  • April 17, 2009: College Affordability (St. Louis, MO)
  • May 26, 2009: Green Jobs (Denver, CO)
  • June 23, 2009: Manufacturing in the 21st Century (Perrysburg, OH)
  • July 10, 2009: Health Reform Roundtable (The White House)
  • July 16, 2009: AARP/Health Care Reform Discussion (Arlington, Virginia)
  • September 9, 2009: Access to College (Syracuse, NY)
  • October 19, 2009: Middle Class Recovery Through Retrofit (The White House)
  • November 5, 2009:  Roundtable with Policy Experts  (Washington, DC)
  • December 16, 2009:  Roundtable with Leaders in Manufacturing Sector (The White House)

Members of the Task Force include: Vice President Biden, Chair; the Secretaries of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, Energy, Treasury, Commerce, Housing and Urban Development, Transportation, and Agriculture; the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency; as well as the Directors of the National Economic Council, the Office of Management and Budget, the Domestic Policy Council, and the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors.

To read reports released by the Middle Class Task Force, please visit: www.WhiteHouse.Gov/AStrongMiddleClass.