The White House

Array

Remarks by President Obama and President Chinchilla of Costa Rica in a Joint Press Conference

National Center for Art and Culture San Jose, Costa Rica

4:55 P.M. CST

PRESIDENT CHINCHILLA:  (As interpreted.)  Good afternoon.  Good afternoon, dear friends.  Dear friends, international journalists and for American and SICA.  Thank you very much.  Thank you for being here with us this afternoon.

In the first place and before we get any deeper concerning the results of the meetings that we just had recently, in the first place, what I would like to do is to reiterate our warmest welcome on behalf of all the Costa Rican people to President Barack Obama and his delegation.  And also I would like to reiterate on behalf of our Costa Ricans the feelings that we feel towards the United States of America. 

And I also wanted to thank you very much for the way so cordial and constructive in which we have been able to develop this afternoon’s issues, Mr. President, because I think that we have had very successful conversations in the bilateral meeting. It was my pleasure to report that precisely thanks to this open process of conversations that we have had, it is that we can explore new horizons, always trying to strengthen these traditions based on the essential values that have characterized the relationship between the United States and Costa Rica.

Particularly speaking, I’m talking about values of peace, freedom, democracy, respect to the human rights and the human development.  These are the values that we share.  And these are the values on which we aspire to continue to develop the relationship between our two nations.

The conversations that we have had have been very useful and they have basically focused on six fundamental issues that reflect this rich diversity that characterizes the relationship between the two nations.  We talked about institutional strengthening.  We talked about issues of international policy and the involvement, in particular to which Costa Rica aspires in the international economic scenario.

We also talked about the use of fundamental instruments in the relationship of the two nations, like CAFTA, for instance.  We talked about an issue that is important but it is not the one that defines our relationship, which is security.  And we also talked about a fundamental issue that undoubtedly is going to define the progress and the joint development not only between the United States of America and Costa Rica, but also between the United States and the Central American region, which is the area of energy.

And finally, of course, in our Costa Rican agenda, we included issues having to do with education, entrepreneurship and innovation.

Please allow me to briefly walk you through these six issues so that you can get to know which has been the central element in each of them.

In the area of institutional strengthening, as you know, the government of the United States is promoting what is called the Alliance of Open Government, that basically seeks to strengthen practices that are much more transparent and integral in everything that has to do with the exercise of institutions of public function.

Costa Rica has been an enthusiastic participant in this initiative.  We have already proposed our action plan, and we expect to continue to share initiatives, practices, exchanges of experiences on this issue.

In the area of involvement of Costa Rica in the economic global scenario and some of the issues of international policy, we are taking into account -- we have used this session to talk about the involvement of the United States in the area of fire weapons -- and that together they have been able to get the approval in the recent meeting of the United Nations. 

Thank you very much, Mr. President, for having sponsored one of the -- that is going to contribute the most to the peace in the world.  In addition, I would like to recognize in particular the efforts of President Obama in his own country in order to raise awareness concerning the regulation of fire weapons.

Costa Rica, as some of you already know, is trying to play a more protagonistic role, especially in the area of global development.  Costa Rica is a small economy, but it’s a very open economy.  It’s a model of success.  The accession of global value changes with more and more competitive in the attraction based on high technology.  And being a middle-income country, we are a country that is not seeking to get more aid.  We basically want to have more opportunities to export what our people are producing.

As we have said in the past, we either export our products the people are able to produce or generate, or we're going to end up exporting our own people.  And Costa Rica will continue to keep Costa Ricans in Costa Rica with better opportunities of economic growth and with better opportunities of welfare.

And that is that the aspirations of Costa Rica include to be able to insert itself in the different fora where we will continue to widen the opportunities of trade, investment, and as a consequence, the opportunities to continue to generate employment and welfare in our country.

To this extent, we have talked to President Obama about two important fora where Costa Rica aspires to be present.  One is the Trans-Pacific Alliance, the TPP, where the government of the United States and especially the Obama administration is paying an important leadership to the effect of hosting this negotiation.  And we would hope that Costa Rica will continue to be the center of attention of the pioneer countries to be able to insert ourselves in the same initiative.

 And the other important forum where we have given our best efforts is the forum for the cooperation and development.  Costa Rica wants to be there precisely because we want to continue to adopt the best possible practices in matters of development of public policy.

In the area of the using of the CAFTA platform, as you know, this is going to be an issue -- an issue of regional scope.  But it has become a bilateral issue to the extent that Costa Rica is one of the economies that has taken advantage of the opportunity provided by the American market.  We have become in the SICA framework the most important partner with the United States. Thanks to CAFTA, the countries in our region have increased by 70 percent the international trade.  And what we basically seek is to be able to promote initiatives in the area of facilitation of trade.

Concerning the area of security, this, as I mentioned before, is an obligated issue.  As you know, Costa Rica considers this a fundamental issue -- has been considering this issue a fundamental one in recent years.  We have been able to do well facing common crime.  We have been able to reduce the homicide rates significantly.  We have been able to reduce the rates of violent crime, thanks to an integral approach in the area of prevention and sanction, as well as the issues having to do with control.  But we also have to admit that the issue of organized crime continues to be important on the institution of stability and the integrity of our nations.

Thus, we talked about this issue.  We had a conversation about it.  We reiterated the importance of keeping the levels of cooperation that we have had so far.  But very particularly, we made the point on the efforts that are being displayed by the SICA countries as well as the United States government with the purpose of approaching the issue of organized crime and drug smuggling from a much more integral approach, a much more diverse approach -- not only through the instruments of war, thinking that we're going to be able to overcome this evil.  A country like Costa Rica cannot go, of course, to war, but we have to take very seriously the strengthening of those mechanisms and those policies that would allow to prevent the entity of organized crime in our country.

And in that sense, we are deliberating the efforts that we might be able to continue on doing in the matter of prevention of consumption with the matter of more opportunities for the younger community of our country on the subject of strengthening the law, of judicial independence, of free press that might be able to carry out the necessary investigations and the accusations without having on them any effect or threat.

The fifth point of the agenda was a subject regarding energy.  It is well-known also for Costa Rica the energy subject has been a value from the point of view of its sustainable development.  Ninety percent of the energy that we consume comes from renewable sources.  Nevertheless, Costa Rica, as well as the rest of Central America, have a very big challenge ahead of them from the point of view of the cost of this energy.  If we do not solve this in the short, midterm, this will have a tremendous weight on the level of competivity [sic] of our region.

Therefore, we have explored with President Obama the possibilities of using the platform of CAFTA so that in the future and once the government of the United States resolves  some of the internal discussions that it might have, to be able to enjoy some preferences in regard to the import of natural gas, natural liquefied gas, a source of energy to which the government of President Obama has put a lot of emphasis on. 

We have also commented about the efforts that we are developing here in Costa Rica with the purpose of promoting a group of new energies, especially the energies based on hydrogen, and the initiatives that have already been working on by the private enterprises both in North America and Costa Rica with the cooperation of the public sector of Costa Rica, to take them into consideration as part of the initiatives that he has promoted in the framework of the Alliance of the Americas for the energy and for the climate change.

 And I finish by talking about the subject of the partnership of innovation and of the education that has such elements of further development.  For Costa Rica, education has been a constant in its historical development.  As I was telling President Obama, we were born as one of the poorest provinces of the colony, and we have become little by little a nation with great opportunities in the subject of economic development and of well-being for the people, and a fundamental factor, an essential factor has been precisely education.

Much before many other nations of the world, Costa Rica decreed the free and mandatory access to education.  And now we dedicate 7 percent of our GDP to finance the public education, and we need, above all, to face the challenge of the reallocation of this education to the demands of the new economy to which we are aspiring to move our country.

In that sense, we have called upon the attention in regard to the possibility of using with greater intensity the very beautiful program that has been characterized by the international policy of the United States, which is the Peace Corps, so that through them, we might be able to improve even more.  They have programs of bilingualism that Costa Rica, for 15 or 20 years we have already been introducing in our public education. 

We believe that through Peace Corps we can achieve training programs with our teachers, with our professors, our English professors, so that that English is a more proficient English, more competitive, with greater quality and bound precisely through the aspirations of attracting investments and generation of employment that we are working on.

Finally, also we have called President Obama’s attention to the fact that there is nothing more valuable, that there is nothing more important than anybody to get to know a society from the inside.  I am a true example precisely of the benefits of scholarship programs that the United States in the past have offered the Central American region.  As a matter of fact, that is why we have -- so that we can continue on promoting those scholarship programs and intensify them so that the youth of the Central American region and, of course, of my country can continue on also knowing or competing not only for knowledge of the best universities, of the quality of education of the United States, but also the values that have characterized this great nation.

So thank you very much.  President Obama.  (Applause.)

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Buenas tardes.  Thank you so much, President Chinchilla, for your kind words and for welcoming me here today.  This is my first visit to Costa Rica.  And even though it is a brief one, I can already tell the incredible spirit of the people, the natural beauty of the country.  I understand that the official slogan for those who are thinking about visiting Costa Rica is “un pais sin ingredientes artificiales.”  So there’s nothing artificial about Costa Rica.  Everything is genuine.  And that's certainly true about the friendship between our two countries. 

And President Chinchilla has been so gracious in her hospitality.  We are very grateful to her.  I want to thank publicly the wonderful schoolchildren who sang for us.  And I noticed that, Madam President, you and I didn’t sing.  We didn’t trust our voices.  (Laughter.)  But we certainly enjoyed the spirit that those children delivered.

In the United States, we are so grateful for the contributions that Costa Ricans make to our country every day.  You welcome many Americans as tourists, eco-tourists, and many others who have chosen to make Costa Rica a new home.  This year we’re also marking the 50th anniversary of the Peace Corps here, including President John F. Kennedy’s visit to Costa Rica and his vision for partnerships that advance development and democracy in the Americas.

I had actually a chance during the bilateral meeting to see a photograph of President Kennedy at the same table that we were meeting at -- it had been specially commissioned.  And so it shows the longstanding ties between our two countries.

And I’m here because Costa Rica is a great partner not just regionally, but globally.  Given Costa Rica’s proud democratic traditions, we stand up together for democracy and justice and human rights in Central America and across the hemisphere.  And I want to commend Costa Rica for your landmark law against the scourge of human trafficking.  I’m proud to be here as you host World Press Freedom Day.  So everybody from the American press corps, you should thank the people of Costa Rica for celebrating free speech and an independent press as essential pillars of our democracy.

Costa Rica shows the benefits of trade that is free and fair.  Over the last few years, under the Central America Free Trade Agreement, our trade with Costa Rica has doubled, creating more jobs for people in both of our countries.  Our partnerships are creating more opportunities for small businesses and entrepreneurs, including young people and women.  As I told President Chinchilla, the United States will continue to be your partner as Costa Rica modernizes its economy so that you’re attracting more investment and creating even more trade and more jobs.

Costa Rica, of course, has long been a leader in sustainable development that protects the environment.  The President and I agreed to continue deepening our clean energy partnerships.  For example, we’re moving ahead with our regional effort to ensure universal access to clean, affordable, sustainable electricity for the people of the Americas, including Costa Ricans.  And this is also another way that we can meet our shared commitments to address climate change.

The President and I reaffirmed our determination to confront the growing security concerns that have affected many Costa Rican families and communities.  And under the Central America Regional Security Initiative, the United States has committed nearly half a billion dollars to helping Costa Rica and its neighbors in this fight.  We’re disrupting drug cartels and gangs.  We're working to strengthen law enforcement and the judicial system.  And we’re addressing the underlying forces that fuel criminality -- with prevention programs for at-risk youth and with economic development that gives young people hope and opportunity.

Meanwhile, as I said in Mexico yesterday, the United States recognizes that we've got responsibilities; that much of the violence in the region is fueled by demand for illegal drugs, including in the United States.  So we’re going to keep on pursuing a comprehensive approach not only through law enforcement, but also through education and prevention and treatment that can reduce demand. 

And finally, I updated the President on our efforts in the United States to pass comprehensive immigration reform.  I know this is of great interest to the entire region, especially those with families in our country.  And I’m optimistic that we’re going to achieve reform that reflects our heritage as both a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants -- men and women and children who need to be treated with full dignity and respect.

So, President Chinchilla, thank you so much for your partnership.  Thank you and the people of Costa Rica for your hospitality. 

I’m told there’s a well-known quote here in Costa Rica -- “Where there is a Costa Rican, wherever it is, there’s liberty.” And in the United States, we’re thankful for the many Costa Ricans who contribute to our prosperity and our liberty.  And we’re grateful for Costa Rica’s leadership in this region, as we’ll see again when President Chinchilla hosts tonight’s SICA meeting. 

I’d note that our presence at tonight’s meeting with the leaders of Central America and the Dominican Republic is a sign of the importance that the United States places on this region, as well as our commitment to being a steady and strong and reliable partner -- because we believe that no matter where you live, the people of this region deserve security and opportunity and dignity.  

So let me, again, say thank you -- and in my best tican -- pura vida.  (Laughter and applause.)

So I think we're going to go Costa Rican press first and then I'll call on someone?

Q    Good afternoon.  Welcome, President Obama.  The policy of the United States for Central America on drug smuggling and organized crime -- don't you think, for both Presidents, that the time has come to improve our relationships and go on to an agenda that apart from security, we have the social aspects of education and health?

And my second question would be if we're going to be  supporting Costa Rica in subjects that were presented today for the SICA?   So, thank you, and welcome.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, thank you very much.  First of all, I completely agree with you, and I’ve tried to emphasize this throughout my trip:  So much of the focus ends up being on security.  And we understand that in the absence of security, it’s very hard to develop.  But we also have to recognize that problems like narco-trafficking arise in part when a country is vulnerable because of poverty, because of institutions that are not working for the people, because young people don't see a brighter future ahead.

And so what President Chinchilla and I spoke extensively about are initiatives like education, institution-building and capacity, trying to create greater economic opportunity, because the stronger the economies and the institutions for legitimate -- for individuals who are seeking legitimate careers, the more those are there, then the less powerful these narco-trafficking operations are going to be.

And so not only are we interested in promoting trade and highlighting the already extensive trade that we’re doing, but we also want to see how can we build on the successes to improve education even in our strategies to fight narco-trafficking.  We, for example, helped to finance youth centers that can give young people a different vision for their futures.  We consider that to be part of our overall effort.  So it can't just be law enforcement.  It also has to be human development, inclusive economic development.  We’ve got to make sure that everybody feels opportunity. 

Now, even if a country is doing well, the scourge of drugs and drug trafficking will still be there, and there still needs to be a strong law enforcement component.  But we can do better than we’re currently doing.  And I know that President Chinchilla is taking a great interest here in Costa Rica around these human development issues.

As far as the issues that you mentioned around international organizations, as I indicated earlier, Costa Rica has shown itself to be a world leader and model around free trade, freedom of the press, democracy, respect for human rights, and that makes it an outstanding candidate for membership in the OECD, for example.  And so we will expect that we’ll continue to support Costa Rica in expanding its influence.

We enjoy a great partnership on, for example, regional human rights councils, as well as international human rights efforts.  Costa Rica has been a real leader, and we appreciate that.  And there’s something very effective when large countries like the United States, smaller countries like Costa Rica share values.  We come in together.  And I think it’s a great way to make the point that regardless of the country’s size, regardless of the language that it speaks, the idea of certain universal rights that are observed for all people is important.  And that's why we value this partnership so much.

PRESIDENT CHINCHILLA:  I’m just going to add a couple of comments.  And I think that it seems to me that I should start by thanking President Obama for his expressed support to the aspirations of Costa Rica for being a member of OECD.  We know that there are tests that we have to comply with, and we know that we will be able to comply with them.

Also, let me add something more precisely -- a comment in regard to the subject of narco traffic, organized crime.  We believe that there is not a single doubt that President Obama’s administration -- since his coming to Mexico, and now his visit here in Central America -- brings along an agenda that is trying to redefine those relationships based on a greater diversity.

As has been said, our countries are more than just security and violence and narco traffic.  That doesn’t mean that it is not an important problem, but I would like to basically finally add the following.  What some other countries for a few years now, with the purpose of trying to review some strategies that fall under the fight against drugs, are based basically on the fact that some of the most immediate experiences we have seen in region are experiences that have had to call upon the extreme fight of the war on drugs.  Costa Rica doesn’t have an army.  And since we don't want to found an army, we do not want to allow ourselves to come to war scenarios to face drug smuggling or organized crime.

Many times the generals ask me, how has Costa Rica done to face such a big threat when you don't have an army and precisely the countries next to you do have an army?  But curiously enough, Costa Rica has demonstrated that we have been more effective and more successful in fighting against these threats precisely without having an army.  And where am I going through with this? That what we're looking for, for a while now, is precisely the signals that the Obama administration is sending in the sense that an effective policy for the fight against drugs and narco traffic goes through the strengthening of the institutions -- through prevention, through an open society, a more transparent society, and through a citizenship that is much more aware of the problem.

It seems to me that advancing that direction is precisely advancing in the correct direction.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  All right, Mark Felsenthal, of Reuters.

Q    Thank you, Mr. President.  Madam President.  Mr. President, on Syria, you said yesterday that anything the United States does should make the situation better, not worse.  How long are you prepared to wait to determine whether chemical weapons were used?  What happens when you make your determination?  And will you take your case to the United Nations?  And have you ruled out putting U.S. troops on the ground in Syria?

     PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, first all, I emphasized yesterday, so let me re-emphasize -- we’re not waiting.  We’re not standing by.  We are currently the largest humanitarian donor to deal with the crisis in Syria.  We are the largest contributor of nonlethal aid to the opposition.  We’ve mobilized 80 countries to support the opposition.  We are working to apply every pressure point that we can on Syria, working with our international partners.

     And so we are actively engaged on a day-to-day basis to try to deal with this crisis and to restore a Syria that is respectful of the rights and aspirations of the Syrian people. 

     Now, as I’ve said before, if, in fact, we see strong evidence that we can present and that allows us to say that the Syrian military and the Syrian government is using chemical weapons, then that is a game-changer for us because not only is there the prospect of widespread use of chemical weapons inside of Syria, but there’s the possibility that it lands in the hands of organizations like Hezbollah.

     We have evidence that chemical weapons have been used.  We don't know when, where, or how they were used.  We are initiating on our own to investigate and get a better handle on the facts inside of Syria.  We’re also working with the international community and our partners to try to get a better handle on what’s happening, and we’ve already gone to the United Nations to say we want a full-blown investigation inside of Syria -- so far, for unsurprising reasons, President Assad has resisted.

     We will stay on this.  Now, if, in fact, there’s the kind of systematic use of chemical weapons inside of Syria, we expect that we’re going to get additional further evidence.  And at that point, absolutely we will present that to the international community, because I think this is, again, not just an American problem; this is a world problem.  There are international rules and protocols and norms and ethics.  And when it comes to using chemical weapons, the entire world should be concerned.

     Now, in terms of what that means in terms of American action, keep in mind we’re already taking a whole range of actions.  We’re going to continue to take a whole range of actions.  Separate and apart from the chemical weapon use, we got tens of thousands of people who are being killed inside of Syria and we want to see that stopped -- for humanitarian reasons but also for strategic reasons.

     But in terms of any additional steps that we take, it’s going to be based on, number one, the facts on the ground.  Number two, it’s going to be based on what’s in the interest of the American people and our national security.  And as President of the United States, I’m going to make those decisions based on the best evidence and after careful consultation -- because when we rush into things, when we leap before we look, then not only do we pay a price, but oftentimes we see unintended consequences on the ground.  So it’s important for us to do it right.  And that's exactly what we’re doing right now.

 

     Q    Good afternoon, President Obama.  Good afternoon, Madam President.  President Obama, 10 years ago you were about to come to the Senate.  Well, 10 years have gone and Central America has lost more than 130,000 lives caused by drugs traffic.  This has been the sacrifice that the region has had because of this problem.  What is the sacrifice that in your four years of government you intend to undertake for this business that feeds on the profit that are produced especially by the consumption in your country?  And if the United States also believes that the best option is to use warships to be able to survey or keep a watch on the seas on the joint anti-narcotic drug war?

     And, Madam President, you have also expressed the values that the government of Costa Rica has with the government of the United States and your point of view with President Obama, for example, on the subject of the international create of weapons -- fire weapons.  You say that President Obama said the time has come to recognize the rights for the homosexual couples of the United States.  When is the time going to come for that in Costa Rica?

     PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, I think all of us recognize the pain and hardship that's been caused by drug trafficking and transnational drug cartels here in Central America.  There’s a cost obviously in the United States as well.  It’s not as if we don't have tragic drug problems throughout the United States.  And when you look at poor communities inside of the United States, including communities in my hometown of Chicago, there are young people who are killed every day as part of the drug trade. 

So this is not a situation where we do not feel the effects. There are common effects, and there are common responsibilities, which is why it’s so important that we work on this on a regional basis. 

     Now, since I’ve been President, we’ve put our money where our mouth is.  I’ve spent -- my administration has spent approximately $30 billion in reducing drug demand in the United States over the last several years.  And we’re actually seeing an impact in terms of reduced demand.  But the United States is a big country and a big market, and so progress sometimes is slower than we’d like it to be.

     There is obviously a role for law enforcement.  I’m not interested in militarizing the struggle against drug trafficking. This is a law enforcement problem.  And if we have effective law enforcement cooperation and coordination, and if we build up capacity for countries in Central America, then we can continue to make progress.

     But the important thing that I’ve tried to emphasize throughout is that this is a common problem.  This is one where we’ll only solve it when we’re working together.  It has adverse effects in all of our countries.  But -- last point I’d make -- I think it’s very important to make sure that our bilateral relationship and the United States relationship with the region as a whole is not solely defined by this problem.  Because when it is, we’re missing all the opportunities that exist out there.

     When I got off the plane I was greeted by Dr. Chang, obviously a well-known scientist here who worked at NASA and is working now on developing a whole new vision for clean energy, and he brought along four young people -- these incredibly talented young people who are in their last year of high school here.  And all of four of them, thanks to some of the good work of our Ambassador and others, will be attending universities in the United States next fall.

     And when you talk to those young people, there’s incredible hope and incredible promise and incredible optimism.  And I don't want every story to be about drug traffickers and nobody is writing a story about those four young people and what they represent in terms of the future of Costa Rica and the future of this region.

     PRESIDENT CHINCHILLA:  Every nation or every society has its own way of evolving towards to the responses that have to be provided to the different demands of the social groups and of the different collectiveness that a country might have.

     And when we analyze the evolution of the different nations, we see how some of them have advance a little more accelerated -- to subjects maybe of commitment towards the environment, in subjects, for example, for the control of some important aspects in the subject of protection of human life, like for example, the the subject of the control of fire weapons.  And others are advancing furthermore in the recognition of certain rights, among them like the one that you have mentioned, the rights of couples of the same sex. 

     The important thing, Alvarro, is that we cannot simply pass on or go beyond the rhythm or the evolution of the debates from one nation to another.  Each one of the nations has its own rhythm.  The important thing here I believe -- and what’s it’s worth here -- is that in Costa Rica the framework precisely of democracy that has characterized us, the debate has to be an open debate, a live debate, an active debate -- a debate like the one that I have in qualifying it that has to take place with the greatest of respect without putting a stigma on the different positions that are brought to the debates that take place in a democracy.

     And only the mature, ripened, seasoned debate will end up giving the result that will have to be given where it has to be given, which is inside the parliament.  So it seems to me that that is what is important, that the debate in Costa Rica is an open debate, a free debate that has to continue as a debate without restrictions.

     That is why I have advocated and restated opportunities in my recent report to the nation that this is a dialogue that has been faced sometimes inconveniently on some positions that take sides.  And as long as this is faced in this way, I think that the advancement is going to be very slow.  I hope and I trust that the debate might really be a much more balanced, much more mature dialogue without putting stigmas on it, and that this might eventually generate a decision in the Congress of the Republic.

     PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Okay, last question, Lisa --

    Q    Thank you, Mr. President.  Senator Leahy is pushing for a bill on recognizing same-sex couples as part of the immigration bill.  Are you concerned at all that that undermines the success of the package?  And given that you made a point throughout your presidency to make clear that you don't think LGTB Americans should be treated any differently, will you sign a bill that will do exactly that?

     And for you, Madam President, is there any concern that the more -- that by creating more stringent immigration standards could hamper the ability of Costa Ricans to emigrate to the U.S.? Thanks.

     PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Lisa, I hope you don't mind, before I answer your question I want to get back to Mark because I realize there was one clause in your question -- sometimes you guys have a lot of clauses in your question -- (laughter) -- that I didn't specifically answer, and I didn't want anybody to extrapolate from that.

     You asked about boots on the ground and whether we’ve ruled boots out on the ground in Syria.  As a general rule, I don't rule things out as Commander-in-Chief because circumstances change and you want to make sure that I always have the full power of the United States at our disposal to meet American national security interests.

     Having said that, I do not foresee a scenario in which boots on the ground in Syria, American boots on the ground in Syria would not only be good for America, but also would be good for Syria.  And by the way, when I consult with leaders in the region who are very much interested in seeing President Assad leave office and stabilizing the situation in Syria, they agree with that assessment. 

     So I just wanted to make sure that my omission there did not turn into a story.

     To your question, Lisa, as I’ve indicated, I’ve got four broad criteria for immigration reform.  I want to make sure that our border is secure and well regulated, in part so that we can get down to the business of smoothing trade and commerce across our borders and creating jobs in the United States, but also making sure that negative actors aren’t able to penetrate the United States.

     Number two, cracking down on employers who are breaking the law.  Number three, making sure we’ve got a legal immigration system that works better, smarter, and so what we can continue to attract the best and the brightest to the United States. 

     And by the way, when it comes to legal immigration, the issue here is not going to be stringency, per se.  The issue is do we make the system more rational, more effective, better.  If there are smart engineers and young people and scientists and students who are looking to emigrate to the United States from Costa Rica, then we want them to know that we’re a nation of immigrants.  But we want to make sure that the legal process is in place so that it’s easier and simpler, but also more effective in managing the legal immigration process.

     And finally, that we’ve got a pathway so that the 11 million or so undocumented workers inside the United States are able to pursue a tough, long, difficult, but fair path to legal status and citizenship. 

So those are my broad-based criteria.  Now, the provision that you’ve discussed that Senator Leahy has talked about is one that I support, and I’ve said in the past that the LGBT community should be treated like everybody else.  That's, to me, the essential, core principle behind our founding documents, the idea that we’re all created equal and that we’re equal before the law, and it’s applied fairly to everybody.

     And so Senator Leahy may present this provision in committee.  It may be presented on the floor.  It will be one of many amendments and provisions that are presented, some of which I’ll support, some of which I’ll think are really bad ideas.  And I think that the general principle for me is are we advancing, are we improving the immigration system -- because ultimately this is an immigration bill.

     And we’ll evaluate the end-product.  I think it’s premature for me to start talking about what I will or will not do before I get a final product since the road is going to be long and bumpy before I finally see an actual bill on my desk.  But I can tell you I think that the provision is the right thing to do.

     I can also tell you that I’m not going to get everything I want in this bill.  Republicans are not going to get everything that they want in this bill.  But if we keep focused on what our main aim is here -- which is creating a smart, effective immigration system that allows us to be a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants -- then we’re going to be in a position to not only improve our economy and what’s happening inside the United States, we’re going to I think have a much stronger relationship with the region and that's going to help enhance our economy and jobs and our growth over the long term.

    And, last point I’ll make, as is true with every bill, if there are things that end up being left out in this bill, or things that I want to take out of a bill, but if it’s meeting those core criteria around a comprehensive immigration bill that I’m looking for, then we go back at it and we fix what’s not there and we continually improve what’s been presented.

     I think that this comprehensive immigration bill has the opportunity to do something historic that we have not done in decades.  But I don't expect that, after we’re finished with it, that people are going to say, there’s not a single problem that we have with our immigration system, any more than is true after any piece of legislation that we pass.

     Well, thank you very much everybody.  Muchas gracias.

     PRESIDENT CHINCHILLA:  Thank you very much.  Thank you very much.  (Applause.)

                   END                     5:45 P.M. CST

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by President Obama and President Pena Nieto of Mexico in a Joint Press Conference

Palacio Nacional
Mexico City, Mexico

4:24 P.M. CDT

PRESIDENT PEÑA NIETO:  (As interpreted.)  Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon, everyone.  First and foremost, after the bilateral meeting, I would like to extend the warmest welcome to President Barack Obama, his team joining him.  Once again, we would like to welcome all of you with open arms, and we hope you feel at home.

We appreciate your will to have upon this meeting a relation built on mutual respect, collaboration for the benefit of our peoples. 

Before we cover the areas that we have shared during our bilateral meeting, on behalf of the Mexican people, I would like to reiterate our solidarity for the regretful acts that were committed in your country -- in Boston and in West, in Texas.  Unfortunately, it took the lives of American citizens. 

If you allow me, I would like to share with the audience and the members of the media the areas that we have addressed with President Obama during the meeting that we just have had. 

First of all, we have reached an agreement that the relation between Mexico and the United States should be broad in terms of the areas that it covers.  It should open up opportunity and collaboration spaces in different arenas, with a very clear purpose in mind to make the North American region a more productive and competitive region that will, end result, trigger the enormous potential that our peoples have, that our nations have.  And we're well aware of the fact that we can take stock of our bilateral relation within the framework of the agreements made, we have reached a new level of understanding as our two new administrations that began roughly at the same time -- the second term of President Obama and my administration. 

Among the items that we covered I can speak for how relevant trade and commerce is in Mexico-U.S. relation.  We have dimension of all the achievements made upon the free trade agreement and the benefits that our economies have received from it.  The exports made from the U.S. to its top trade partners, Mexico and Canada, this represents one-third out of each three products that are exported from the U.S. and only the relation with Mexico is higher than the one the U.S. has with European countries like the U.K., France, the Netherlands all together, or the exports sent to China and Japan together doesn’t reach the level that the U.S. has with Mexico. 

I must stand out that the integration of our economies in the last years has shown to be relevant and the content of exports sent from Mexico have 40 percent of U.S. input.  Therefor I can conclude that the more growth Mexico shows and the more capacity to export, the more benefit the U.S. gets.  Jobs are created in Mexico; therefore jobs are created in the United States. 

Therefore, one of the first agreements that we have made was to create a high-level dialogue that, within its framework, will foster trade and commerce with the United States.  This means that for the first time -- and probably this is unprecedented -- we will have the Mexican economic cabinet with their counterparts from various government agencies from the United States, as well as high-ranking officials.  And we've heard from the President that in this group, the Vice President of the United States will participate in order to set a dialogue that will result in arrangements in terms of how the government can support all the efforts made by the private sector in order to have stronger economic integration.

For this purpose, we have agreed that during the fall of this year, this high-level group will meet for the first time with the attendance of high-ranking officials to start working in the area of the economy. 

We have also agreed to endeavor joint actions to have a safer border.  Within the framework of the agreement made, we will have a 21st century border that was about to be defined the work and action agenda that our teams have already set up.  And now, through this agenda, we will have safer borders that will enable and expedite the transit of people and goods that every day cross our borders.

We have also agreed to create a bi-national group in order to find joint actions and joint mechanisms to support entrepreneurs in both of our countries, and by this we will boost the SMEs in our countries.  We believe that this mechanism will serve as an enabler and it will see further development for these small and medium-size companies that are present in both of our countries.  And we hope that all the actions in the very near future will make the SMEs in the future becoming large enterprises.  And this action will favor specifically young entrepreneurs in both our countries.

Thirdly, to boost our economy and our potential, we have agreed to create a bilateral forum on higher education, innovation and research.  Two government agencies will work together -- CONACYT and the National Science Foundation from the U.S. -- and presidents from Mexico and U.S. universities will be part of this group.  And by this, more exchanges will happen between Mexico and the U.S., and students coming from the U.S. to Mexico.

We have agreed that higher education serves as a platform to boost the economic potential that we have in our nations.  In order to compete with the world, specifically the highly developed countries where science and technology have been the target of their efforts and investment, it is fundamental that we have well-prepared youngsters with the skills necessary to give our economic development a greater strength and a greater capacity.

In a different arena, we have addressed security.  We have both recognized the level of cooperation that the U.S. has shown towards the Mexican government.  And the strategy in the area of security in our country has a very clear purpose, and that is to fight organized crime in all of its forms, be it drug dealing, kidnapping for ransom, extortion, or any crime perpetrated.  We are not going to renounce that responsibility as a government and my administration.  We’re going to face crime in all of its forms.

But in our new strategy we have emphasized the fact that we will reduce violence.  Fortunately systems between Mexicans to fight organized crime and reduce violence are not objectives that contradict each other.  There is no clash between these two goals.  These are two goals that fall within the framework of one same strategy.  And President Obama’s administration has expressed his will, as we know, to cooperate on the basis of mutual respect, to be more efficient in our security strategy that we are implementing in Mexico.

I have shared with President Obama as well what Mexico has done during the first months of my administration.  I have shared with President Obama that Mexico has reached maturity in terms of its democracy.  All political forces in the country have reached political maturity, and have shown to be civil and have managed to show respect to each other and also towards the government of Mexico.  Together we have managed to set up a working agenda that, end result, will advance the reforms that will transform this structure that Mexico needs to boost its development.  I have shared with President Obama the fact that we recognize all political voices in Mexico. 

Finally, I would like to share with all of you that we fully agree that our nations, our peoples must move from being neighbors to being part of a community.  We are already part of a trade integration process.  We have reached high levels of development.  But still there is potential to make of our nations, through collaboration and integration of North America we can make a more productive and a more competitive region.

I would like to conclude by quoting the words that former President Kennedy shared during his visit to Palacio Nacional 51 years ago, under former President Adolfo López Mateos -- we have shared this quote with President Obama, but I would like to share it with all of you.  

President Kennedy said to President López Mateos, “Geography has made us neighbors.  Tradition has made us friends.”  Let us not allow a gap to fall between what nature has united.  And that is why we vow so that this understanding, this dialogue climate that we have set up, end result, will give us more growth, more development and more opportunities for our peoples.

Once again, allow me to reiterate, President Obama, and this goes for your delegation as well, you are warmly welcomed to Mexico and I hope that your stay is fruitful and you enjoy your stay in Mexico as well.

Thank you very much.  (Applause.)

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Muchas gracias, Señor Presidente, to President Peña Nieto for your kind words and your extraordinary hospitality.  As President-elect, you were the first leader I welcomed to the White House after our election.  It was a sign of our extraordinarily close relationship between our two countries.

During Enrique’s visit, I noted that he spent time as a student in the United States in one of our most beautiful states, the state of Maine.  I must say, though, Maine is very cold, and so when I come here on a beautiful spring day here in this beautiful city, I understand why you came back home.   

I want to thank you for your hospitality.  I look forward to joining you and the First Lady, la Señora Rivera, this evening.  And I want to thank all the people of Mexico for such a warm welcome.  It’s always a pleasure to visit. 

As President Peña Nieto discussed, between our two countries, we’re some 430 million people.  Ten million -- tens of millions of Mexican Americans enrich our national life in the United States.  Well over 1 million Americans live here in Mexico.  Every year, millions of tourists -- most of them from the United States -- visit this magnificent country.  Every day, millions of workers in our countries earn a living from the jobs that are made possible by our trade, and more than 1 million people cross our shared border -- businesspeople, students, educators, scientists, researchers, collaborating in every sphere of human endeavor.

In other words, Mexico and the United States have one of the largest, most dynamic relationships of any two countries on Earth.  And yet, we don’t always hear about all aspects of these extraordinary ties because too often two issues get attention:  security or immigration. 

Obviously these are serious challenges, and President Peña Nieto and I discussed them in depth today.  I agreed to continue our close cooperation on security, even as the nature of that cooperation will evolve.  As I told the President, it is obviously up to the Mexican people to determine their security structures and how it engages with other nations, including the United States.  But the main point I made to the President is that we support the Mexican government’s focus on reducing violence, and we look forward to continuing our good cooperation in any way that the Mexican government deems appropriate.

I also reaffirmed our determination in the United States to meet our responsibilities -- to reduce the demand for illegal drugs and to combat the southbound flow of illegal guns and cash that help to fuel violence. 

Again, I want to pay tribute to the people of Mexico, who’ve made extraordinary sacrifices for their security, and display great courage and resolve every day. 

But even as we continue to deal with these urgent challenges, we can’t lose sight of the larger relationship between our peoples, including the promise of Mexico’s economic progress.  I believe we’ve got a historic opportunity to foster even more cooperation, more trade, more jobs on both sides of the border, and that’s the focus of my visit.  

The United States and Mexico have one of the largest economic relationships in the world.  Our annual trade has now surpassed $500 billion -- more than $1 billion every day.  We are your largest customer, buying the vast majority of Mexican exports.  Mexico is the second largest market for U.S. exports.  So every day, our companies and our workers -— with their integrated supply chains —- are building products together.  And this is the strong foundation that we can build on. 

I want to commend President Peña Nieto and the Mexican people for the ambitious reforms that you’ve embarked on to make your economy more competitive, to make your institutions more effective.  And I know it’s hard, but it’s also necessary.

Ultimately, only Mexicans can decide how Mexico reforms.  But let me repeat what I told the President -- as Mexico works to become more competitive, you’ve got a strong partner in the United States, because our success is shared.  When one of us prospers, both of us prosper.  And that’s the context for the progress that we made today.

As the President mentioned, we’re, first of all, creating a high-level dialogue to broaden and deepen our economic relationship.  On our side, it will be led by members of my Cabinet.  Vice President Biden will participate as well.  Together with Mexico, we’ll focus on increasing the connections between our businesses and workers, promoting innovation and entrepreneurship and making our economies even more competitive.

To that end, we also reaffirmed our goal of concluding negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership this year.  This would be another major step in integrating our two economies and positioning us to compete in the fastest-growing markets in the world, those in the Asia Pacific region.  We want to be able to sell more goods from Mexico and the United States.  And if we’re partnering together, we can do even better.

We agreed to continue making our shared border even more efficient -- with new infrastructure and new technologies -- so it’s even faster and cheaper to trade and do business together.  We reaffirmed our commitment to the clean energy partnerships that allow our two countries to enhance our energy security and combat climate change.  And I’m very pleased that we’ve agreed to expand collaborations and exchanges between our students, our schools and our universities. 

Just as Enrique once studied in our country, we want more Mexicans studying in the United States, and we want more American students studying here in Mexico.  And we’re going to focus on science and technology and engineering and math to help our young people -— including our daughters -— succeed in this global economy.

And finally, I updated the President on our efforts in the United States to pass common-sense comprehensive immigration reform that lives up to our tradition as a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants, including generations of Mexican Americans.

As we do, I think it’s important for everybody to remember that our shared border is more secure than it’s been in years.  Illegal immigration attempts into the United States are near their lowest level in decades, and legal immigration continues to make both of our countries stronger and more prosperous and more competitive.

And this, in part, reflects the economic progress and greater opportunities here in Mexico.  I think this progress should help inform the debate in the United States.  And I’m optimistic that we’re finally going to get comprehensive immigration reform passed.

I’ll have much more to say about this and some other issues in my speech tomorrow.  But for now, I want to express my gratitude to the President for his hospitality and also for your leadership.  And given the progress that we’re seeing here in Mexico, I see so many opportunities to continue to deepen the extraordinary friendship and common bond that we share between our two great nations and our two great peoples.  I know we will do that. 

So thank you very much.  Muchas gracias.  (Applause.)

MODERATOR:  Now, we will have a round of four questions.

Q    To the President of Mexico, we welcome gladly that the agenda is -- there is no speculation on the priority topics to be included in your agendas.  Could you clarify this high-level group, please, as you have pointed out, will overcome efficiently the results of a fight that these two nations had on the issue of security?  It seems to be that trade is now a priority; no longer security is.

And for President Obama, given your expertise during this second administration, what is your take on Enrique Peña Nieto’s new administration in terms of reforms?  You have acknowledged the reforms made so far.  Is the U.S. government seeing this reform as on the part of the administration, or a pact?  Thank you.

PRESIDENT PEÑA NIETO:  Thank you very much.  We have relaunched our relationship and we have agreed on the climate in which we're going to work.  We have defined our priorities.  We don't want to make this relationship targeted on one single issue.  We want to grow in our relation to include different areas, and we want to specially emphasize our relation on the trade relation potential between Mexico and the U.S.

We're also going to cover other areas.  Of course, public safety is included, and we have shared our view on that topic to work towards reducing violence by combatting efficiently organized crime. 

And I must insist we have reviewed the long list of potential and opportunities that we have identified in the economic relation between the U.S. and Mexico in the area of trade and commerce.  President Obama has already put it for the U.S.  We represent a market that receives their exports -- we're the second export destination, and in our case, the United States ranks first.  We need to identify the areas where we can supplement each other’s production of goods and exports and goods from Mexico to the world, because these goods have a high content of U.S. input.

As I have stated, this means that if Mexico does well in its productive capabilities -- that is to say by creating more labor and its capability to export more products -- the U.S. will benefit, and vice versa. 

That is why this high-level meeting foresees the participation of officials that are a part of my cabinet.  The U.S. has not a tradition of having cabinets like the ones we have, but President Obama has decided that high-ranking officials from different government agencies will participate, including the U.S. Vice President.  They will be part of this high-level group that will define specific actions. 

What has been done so far in the private sector complementarity has happened.  And we have seen a good flow of trade between our countries.  There is no doubt that even when it has reached a certain level we can push it further.  We can extend its capabilities if both of our governments identify the right mechanisms, the right formula to boost economic integration.  And that is precisely the agreement that we have reached today.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, first of all, just on the security issue, I think it’s natural that a new administration here in Mexico is looking carefully at how it’s going to approach what has obviously been a serious problem.  And we are very much looking forward to cooperating in any ways that we can to battle organized crime, as President Peña Nieto stated.

And we anticipate that there’s going to be strong cooperation, that on our side of the border, we have continued work to do to reduce demand and to try to stem the flow of guns and cash from North to South. 

So this is a partnership that will continue.  I think that President Peña Nieto and his team are organizing a vision about how they can most efficiently and effectively address these issues.  And we will interact with them in ways that are appropriate, respecting that ultimately Mexico has to deal with its problems internally and we have to deal with ours as well.

With respect to the President’s agenda, we had a wonderful relationship with President Calderón and the previous administration.  The bonds between our two countries go beyond party.  If a Republican president replaces me there’s still going to be great bonds between Mexico and the United States because not just the geography, but friendship and our interactions.

But what I have been impressed with is the President’s boldness in his reform agenda.  He’s tackling big issues.  And that's what the times demand.  We live in a world that is changing rapidly, and in both the United States and in Mexico we can't be caught flat-footed as the world advances. 

We have to make sure that our young people are the best educated in the world.  And that means that some of the old ways of educating our kids may not work.  We have to make sure that we're staying at the forefront of science and technology.  And that means we've got to make sure that we're investing in those areas appropriately.  We have to make certain that our economies are competitive around the world and that, when it comes to energy, that we're addressing issues like climate change, but also making sure that it’s done in a way that's creating jobs and businesses on both sides of the border.

And so what I very much appreciate is the President’s willingness to take on hard issues, because sometimes I think there’s a temptation once somebody is elected to just stay elected, as opposed to trying to make sure that we use our time as well as we can to bring about the kind of changes will help move the country forward. 

Q    Thank you, Mr. President.

Q    Thank you, Mr. President.  Administration officials, including Secretary Hagel, say that the U.S. is now more seriously considering sending weapons to the Syrian rebels.  How has your thinking on the effectiveness of such a step evolved as the violence in Syria has continued?  And do you now see lethal aid as the best option available for a U.S. escalation in Syria?

I also had a question on immigration that I was hoping you both could address.  Senator Rubio said today that on the immigration bill being considered on Capitol Hill it may not pass the Senate unless the border security measures are strengthened. Are you concerned that an effort to bolster those border security triggers may make a pathway to citizenship almost impossible for many people already in the U.S. illegally, including many Mexicans?

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, first of all, on Syria, what Secretary Hagel said today is what I've been saying now for months, which is we are continually evaluating the situation on the ground, working with our international partners to find the best way to move a political transition that has Assad leaving, stabilizes the country, ends the killing, and allows the Syrian people to determine their own destiny.  And we've made enormous investments not just in humanitarian aid but also in helping the opposition organize itself and make sure that it has a consistent vision about how it’s operating. 

And as we've seen evidence of further bloodshed, potential use of chemical weapons inside of Syria, what I've said is, is that we're going to look at all options.  And we know that there are countries that are currently providing lethal aid to the opposition.  We also know that the Assad regime is getting not just lethal aid but also training and support from countries outside of Syria.  And we want to evaluate and make sure that every step that we take advances the day when Assad is gone and you have people inside of Syria who are able to determine their own destiny rather than engage in a long, bloody sectarian war.

And we'll continue to evaluate that every step of the way.  But as I mentioned in my press conference back in D.C., we want to make sure that we look before we leap and that what we're doing is actually helpful to the situation as opposed to making it more deadly or more complex.

With respect to immigration reform, I expressed to President Peña Nieto that I'm optimistic about us getting this done because it’s the right thing to do.  We've seen leaders from both parties indicate that now is the time to get comprehensive immigration reform done.  And part of what we discussed is the importance of getting it done precisely because we do so much business between our two countries that for us to constantly bog down on these border issues and debates instead of moving forward with a 21st century border that's maintaining security, and that is making sure that legal immigration and legal trade and commerce is facilitated, but at the same time ensures that we're not seeing a lot of illegal traffic, and allows us to continue to be a nation of immigrants that has contributed so much to the wealth and prosperity of our nation -- if we're going to get that done, now is the time to do it.

And the bill that Senator Rubio and others put forward I think is a great place to start.  It doesn’t contain everything I want, and I suspect that the final legislation will not contain everything I want.  It won't contain everything that Republican leaders want either.  But if we can get a basic framework that secures our border, building on the extraordinary success we've already had and the cooperation we've had with the Mexican government, that cracks down on employers who are not taking the law seriously, that streamlines and enhances our legal immigration system -- because the problems with our legal immigration system often force people into the illegal immigration system -- and provides a pathway to citizenship for those who are currently living in the shadows inside of the United States -- if it has those elements, then we should be able to build on that.  And we can have arguments about other elements of this as we go further, but that's the core of what we need. 

And frankly, we've put enormous resources into border security.  Don't take my word for it; you had folks like Senator McCain and Senator Graham come down to the border and see the progress that's been made.  There are areas where there’s still more work to be done.  Some of it, by the way, is not simply securing the United States from illegal traffic; some of it is also improving the infrastructure, which we talked about, for commerce to be able to come in smoothly, which creates jobs and helps our businesses both in the United States and in Mexico.

But what I'm not going to do is to go along with something where we're looking for an excuse not to do it as opposed to a way to do it.  And I think we can -- I think if all sides operate in good faith that can be accomplished.

PRESIDENT PENA NIETO:  On that matter, allow me to note that the Mexican government acknowledges the efforts made and the leadership made by President Barack Obama and your Congress to eventually pass an immigration bill.  Mexico understands that this is a domestic affair for the U.S. and we wish you the best push that you're giving to immigration. 

That is what I have to say in terms of the foreign press.

Q    Thank you very much.  Good afternoon.  Mr. President, good afternoon.  I would like to ask you both specifically what would be the most important outcome of President Obama’s visit to Mexico, on the one hand?  That is my question.  And I would like to ask you as well:  Have you considered the possibility to scale up the Mexico-U.S. relation and to integrate the region further? This could lead to a bi-national strategy in terms of fighting organized crime trans-nationally.  Thank you very much for your answers.

PRESIDENT PEÑA NIETO:  Thank you very much.  In order to conclude this meeting, I would like to say that we have revitalized our relation between two governments that have two new administrations -- this is President Obama’s second term, and this new administration for Mexico.  The climate in which we are strengthening our relation is based on cordiality; our relation is based on respect; it’s based on cooperation and collaboration in all of those areas that we share a common interest. 

We are not going to target this relation in one specific area.  We want to address multiple issues.  We want to work on an agenda that would allow us to identify all the potential areas that could help us advance our agenda. 

We have emphasized trade and commerce during this visit because we have made a thorough analysis of the U.S. and Mexico trade relations -- have analyzed trade flows and how our economies complement each other.  And there is potential if we truly want to become in a more productive and more competitive North America region, well, that's what we need to do first to compete with other regions in the world.

Those are the highlights and specifically the agreements made to create a high-level dialogue, the bilateral forum to advance academic exchanges and to work towards science and innovation in both of our countries.

Also we will have a bi-national dialogue to foster SMEs.  Undoubtedly these are mechanisms that, end result, will help us project further the economic and trade relation that Mexico has with the United States. 

And certainly, I must insist, let me say it very clearly, the cooperation that we already have with the U.S. in the area of security, let me tell you that under this new strategy, we’re going to order things up.  We’re going to make it institutional. The channels will be very clear.  We’re going to use one single channel in order to be more efficient, to attain better results.

And we have reached a very good understanding with the U.S. government.  They know why we’re emphasizing violence reduction in our strategy.  President Obama has expressed his respect to the strategy that Mexico’s government will define in the area of security, and they have shown to be willing to cooperate with us in order to reach the goals that we have set up to have a peaceful Mexico where there is security.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  I think President Peña Nieto summarized it well.  Let me give you one specific example, and that is the work that our countries are doing together around the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the TPP. 

Our largest trading partner is Canada.  Our second largest trading partner is Mexico.  So North America has already become far more integrated economically than it was 10 years or 20 years ago.  There are suppliers from Mexico who sell to U.S. companies that in turn sell back into Mexico or sell to Canada or sell around the world.  There are jobs that are created in Mexico, jobs that are created in the United States.  All of our economies have grown as a consequence of the work that's taking place together. 

But as I said, the world is changing.  So the fastest growing part of the world is the Asia Pacific region -- huge markets.  And by us working closely together to upgrade and revamp our trade relationship we’re also in a position to project outward and start selling more goods and services around the world.  And that means more jobs and more businesses that are successful in Mexico and in the United States. 

Some of that is going to be bilateral.  So finding ways that we can reduce trade frictions, improving our transportation and our infrastructure cross-border, how we can improve our clean energy cooperation -- already you have a situation in which energy that is created in power plants in California sometimes is sold during nonpeak times into Mexico.  And then when it’s peak times in California, then it’s sold back into California, which makes it more efficient on both sides of the border, and that reduces the cost for consumers on both sides.  Those are the kinds of very specific areas that we can continue to refine and improve on.  And that's what this high-level economic dialogue will accomplish.

But even as we’re improving our bilateral negotiations, what it also allows us to do, then, is to say we’re aligned in projecting both to the Pacific and to the Atlantic in saying let’s make sure that we’re taking advantage of all the economic opportunities that are taking place around the world. 

When the United States prospers, Mexico does well.  And when Mexico does well, the United States does well.  And that I think is the main message of my visit here today.  That's what I want to make sure we’re focused on, because certainly in the United States -- and I know here in Mexico as well -- when the economy is growing, when people have opportunity, then a lot of our other problems are solved -- or at least we have the resources to solve them.  And so that is something that we really want to make sure that we’re focused on during the rest of my term in office and during President Peña Nieto’s term in office.

Q    Thank to you both.  Mr. President, I wanted to ask about a domestic issue if I could, the FDA rule on the morning-after pill that came out this week that prohibits girls under 15 from buying the morning-after pill without a prescription.  I’m wondering what your opinion on the rule is, and if it resolves some of the concerns you expressed last year when you talked about your role as a father and how that’s influenced your thinking on this, and if you believe that there’s scientific evidence to justify the 15 year-old cutoff. 

And for President Peña Nieto, I wanted to ask you about gun control.  The President’s most recent attempt to pass new legislation on guns just failed in the Senate.  You’ve spoken out on this before.  I’m wondering if you talked to him about this in your meeting and if you would urge him -- have urged him to try again, or if there’s more that you think the White House could do administratively, without approval from Congress, to resolve the issue.  Thank you.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, first of all, on the FDA issue, let me make a couple points clear.  Number one, this is a decision made by the FDA and the Secretary of Health and Human Services.  It’s not my decision to make. 

The first time around where there were no age restrictions, Secretary Sebelius expressed concerns and I supported those concerns.  And I gave voice to them in the press room back in DC.
The rule that's been put forward by the FDA Secretary Sebelius has reviewed; she’s comfortable with, I’m comfortable with.

The second point I want to make is I’m very supportive of contraception because I think it’s very important that women have control over their health care choices and when they are starting a family.  That's their decision to make.  And so we want to make sure that they have access to contraception.  As you know we had a little bit of a fuss around what we’re doing with the Affordable Care Act, but I very much think that's the right thing to do. 

So the current ruling is actually -- you phrased it as prohibiting -- I think you could phrase it as they're now allowing these contraceptives to be sold over the counter for 15-year-olds and older.  It has not resolved the question of girls younger than 15.

There was a court case that came up that is being appealed by the Justice Department.  That's a Justice Department decision. My understanding is part of it has to do with the precedent and the way in which the judge handled that case.  And my suspicion is, is that the FDA may now be called upon to make further decisions about whether there’s sufficient scientific evidence for girls younger than 15. 

That's the FDA’s decision to make.  That's Secretary Sebelius’s decision to review.  But I’m very comfortable with the decision they’ve made right now based on solid scientific evidence for girls 15 and older.

I know you didn't direct the question to me, though, I do want to editorialize just for a second about gun control.   As I think all your Mexican counterparts understand and as I talked about with President Peña Nieto, we recognize we’ve got obligations when it comes to guns that are oftentimes being shipped down South and contributing to violence here in Mexico. 

But, frankly, what I’m most moved by are the victims of gun violence not just in Mexico but back home -- like the parents in Newtown.  And I said the day that the legislation that had been proposed by Senators Manchin and Toomey in the Senate -- the day that that failed to get 60 votes -- that that was not the end; this was the beginning.
The last time we had major gun legislation it took six, seven, eight tries to get passed.  Things happen somewhat slowly in Washington, but this is just the first round.  And when you’ve got 90 percent of the American people supporting the initiatives that we put forward around background checks and making sure that drug traffickers, for example, can't just send in somebody with a clear record to purchase guns on their behalf with no way of tracking or stopping that, when you had common-sense legislation like that that the overwhelming majority of Americans, including gun owners, those of us who strongly support the Second Amendment, all of us supporting, I believe that eventually we’re going to get that done.  And I’m going to keep on trying.

So I didn't mean to horn in on President Peña Nieto’s response, but I just want to be clear that we’re going to keep at this.  One thing I am is persistent. 

PRESIDENT PEÑA NIETO:  In that regard, I believe that we are in agreement with President Obama’s words.  And what Mexico would like to see happening in the U.S. -- that is to control better the sales of weapons -- and we cannot ignore the efforts made by President Obama’s administration in order to approve the better control of weapons -- if Mexico could add itself up to this important sector of the U.S. population -- 90 percent in favor of gun control -- we would do it.  But this is a domestic issue in the United States.

In terms of the areas that we are working in collaboration, areas that we can address is specifically to address the fact that weapons bought in the U.S. could be brought to Mexico.  Regretfully, many lives of Mexicans have been lost due to that illegal smuggling of weapons bought in the United States that have reached Mexican soil.  We have made our commitment, and we’re working on it to work together towards making our borders safer.  We are fighting illegal smuggling of weapons.

Mexico vows towards the efforts made by your government, and we’ll keep on supporting you to have better gun control in your country.  But we’re not going to wait until that happens.  We are working by using more intelligence information, and we are taking action to have safer borders so that we don't have weapons being smuggled into Mexico that regretfully end up hurting many Mexicans.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Thank you very much, everybody.  Muchas gracias.  (Applause.)

END
5:15 P.M. CDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President in Personnel Announcements

Rose Garden
 
 
10:12 A.M. EDT
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Good morning, everybody.  Please have a seat.  Sit.  (Laughter.)  
 
My top priority as President is to grow the economy, create good middle-class jobs, make sure that the next generation prospers.  And in a few minutes, I’ll be departing the White House for a trip that will promote that priority.
 
First, I'm going to visit Mexico, one of our largest economic partners.  Then I'll be visiting Costa Rica, where I’ll attend a summit with Central American leaders.  And in both instances, I'm going to be working to deepen our economic and trade relationships across Latin America –- relationships that create jobs and growth here at home, and offer our businesses growing markets where they can sell more American-made goods and services abroad.  
 
But before I go, I had some business to do.  I am proud to announce that I’ll be nominating two outstanding individuals to my Cabinet who will focus on precisely these issues.
 
Over the past four years, I’ve tasked the Secretary of Commerce and the U.S. Trade Representative with opening new markets for American goods and services, doubling our exports for those goods and services all in support of millions of American jobs.  And over those four years, Ron Kirk, along with his outstanding team at USTR, has stood up for free trade and for American workers and businesses around the world.  So he’s finalized trade deals with South Korea, Colombia, Panama.  He’s cracked down on unfair trading practices to give American workers a fair shot in the global economy.  And I could not be prouder of the work that he has done. 
 
Meanwhile, at the Department of Commerce, Becky Blank has led our efforts to help promote high-tech manufacturing and travel and tourism -- it is a big portfolio -- and she has worked closely with the private sector to make sure that America remains the best place in the world to do business.  
 
So I could not be more thankful to Ron and to Becky for their outstanding service.  (Applause.)  Ron couldn’t be here today, but many members of his team are here, and we are so thankful to them.  Becky, thank you.  Becky is going to be taking on a pretty big job -- making sure those badgers behave up in Wisconsin.  (Laughter.)  And we know she's going to be extraordinary leading that institution.  
 
But today, I’m in a position to nominate two extraordinary individuals to continue the work of Ron and Becky as key members of my economic team.
 
As I said in my State of the Union Address, when it comes to growing our economy and our middle class, we should focus on three things.  Number one, making sure America is a magnet for good jobs.  Number two, helping workers earn the skills they need to get those jobs.  And number three, making sure their hard work actually leads to a decent living.  Both these individuals share that focus.
 
First, I’m nominating Penny Pritzker to serve as my Secretary of Commerce.  Penny is one of our country’s most distinguished business leaders.  She's got more than 25 years of management experience in industries including real estate, finance, and hospitality.  She’s built companies from the ground up.  She knows from experience that no government program alone can take the place of a great entrepreneur.  She knows that what we can do is to give every business and every worker the best possible chance to succeed by making America a magnet for good jobs.
 
And Penny understands that just as great companies strengthen the community around them, strong communities and skilled workers also help companies thrive.  So she’s been an extraordinary civic leader in our shared hometown of Chicago.  She served as a member of my Jobs Council.  She was the driving force behind Skills for America’s Future, which is a program that brings together companies and community colleges to shape and prepare skills-based training programs for workers that are tied into the businesses that potentially will hire them. 
 
So she's got extraordinary experience.  And in case I haven’t embarrassed her enough -- she's got a wonderful family; I watched her kids grow up -- and today is her birthday.  So Happy Birthday, Penny.  (Applause.)  For your birthday present, you get to go through confirmation.  (Laughter.)  It's going to be great.  (Laughter.)      
 
Meanwhile, over two decades in both the public and private sectors, Mike Froman, who I’m nominating to serve as my U.S. Trade Representative, has established himself as one of the world’s foremost experts on our global economy.  And I'm not surprised, by the way, because we went to law school together -- he was much smarter than me then, he continues to be smarter than me now.  
 
And over the past four years, he’s been my point person at global forums like the G8 and the G20 -- and, by the way, when I say point person, he's really been the driving force, oftentimes, in organizing these incredible international summits in which huge amounts of business gets done.  He's been a key negotiator alongside Ron Kirk on those trade agreements for South Korea, Colombia, and Panama, which support tens of thousands of American jobs.  
 
He has won the respect of our trading partners around the world.  He has also won a reputation as being an extraordinarily tough negotiator while doing it.  He does not rest until he’s delivered the best possible deal for American businesses and American workers.  He’s fought to make sure that countries that break the rules are held accountable.  
 
And Mike believes, just as I believe and just as Penny believes, that our workers are the most competitive in the world, so they deserve a level playing field.  And Mike's going to continue to fight for that level playing field in his new role, as he helps to move forward trade negotiations with both the Asia-Pacific region and Europe, and will also continue to advise me on a broad range of economic issues. 
 
And as I think some of you have gathered, I've had a chance to get to know Penny and Mike not just as leaders and professionals, but also as friends.  And one of the reasons I’m proud to nominate them is they don't forget what matters.  They know this is not about just growing balance sheets.  It’s about growing opportunity for people.  It’s about growing a sense of security for the middle class.  And, most of all, they operate with integrity and they understand that public service is a privilege, and you've got to do it right when you get involved on behalf of the American people. 
 
So I just want to thank Penny and Mike and their extraordinary families for agreeing to serve in these roles.  I urge the Senate to confirm Penny and Mike without delay, because they've got a lot of work to do.  And I intend to work them to the bone as soon as they're official.  (Laughter.)  So thank you very much, everybody.  And thanks to their families for putting up with what I know will be challenging, but ultimately the extraordinary award of working on behalf of the American people.  
 
Thank you very much.  (Applause.)   
 
END
10:20 A.M. EDT
 

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President on Personnel Announcements

State Dining Room

2:27 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Thank you, everybody.  Please have a seat.  Thank you so much.

Well, good afternoon, everybody.  And today I’m proud to put forward two outstanding individuals who are going to help us grow our economy, but are also going to be looking out for the middle class.

Seven years after the housing bubble burst, triggering the worst financial crisis of our lifetimes and costing Americans millions of jobs, and, in some cases, their homes, our housing market is finally beginning to heal.  Construction is expanding; housing starts are up nearly 50 percent.  Just yesterday we learned that home prices in many cities are rising at the fastest rate since 2006.

So we’re starting to see some bright spots in one of the most important parts of our economy.  But I think everybody understands we’ve still got more work to do.  We’ve got more folks to help.  We've got responsible homeowners who have never missed a payment, but aren’t allowed to refinance.  We've got working families who are doing everything right, but still owe more on their homes than they’re worth.  We've got young people who are trying to start a family and get into the housing market, and have seen difficulties in terms of financing.

So there are a lot of areas where we can make significant improvement.  That’s why I’ve called on Congress to give every responsible homeowner in America the chance to save $3,000 a year by refinancing at today’s historically low rates.  That’s $3,000 -- it's like a tax cut for every family who refinances.  And families who would be interested in refinancing should ask their Representatives why they wouldn’t we act on that, why don’t we get moving on that.  I'm ready to sign that bill, and I know that we're talking to members of Congress on both sides of the aisle who recognize this is something that needs to get done.  

In the meantime, I’ll keep taking whatever steps I can administratively on my own.  And one of the best things I can do is to nominate Mel Watt to lead the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Mel was raised by a single mom, who is here today.  It's wonderful to see you.  You look just great.  And Michelle does say hi.  (Applause.)  Like many people I meet, when I first met Mel's mom, the first thing she says is, I want to see Michelle.  (Laughter.)  That’s kind of how things go for me.  (Laughter.) 

Anyway, Mel's mom raised Mel and his brothers in Charlotte, North Carolina, just outside -- grew up in a house where you could see the stars through the roof and the ground through the floor.  But Evelyn Watt sacrificed and worked hard to give her boys a fighting chance.  As Mel says, “[She] never, ever let us know we were poor or couldn’t do anything that anybody else could do.”

And that love and support eventually led Mel to Congress, where he’s represented the people of North Carolina for 20 years –- every one of them as a member of the committee that oversees housing policy.  And in that capacity, Mel has led efforts to rein in unscrupulous mortgage lenders.  He’s helped protect consumers from the kind of reckless risk-taking that led to the financial crisis in the first place.  And he’s fought to give more Americans in low-income neighborhoods access to affordable housing.

So Mel understands as well as anybody what caused the housing crisis.  He knows what it’s going to take to help responsible homeowners fully recover.  And he’s committed to helping folks just like his mom -- Americans who work really hard, play by the rules day in and day out to provide for their families.  So, Mel, thank you so much for agreeing to accept this nomination.  Thank you.  (Applause.)

You can tell he’s a good congressman because some of his staff is choking up.  (Laughter.)
 
My second nominee will have a very different job, but one that’s equally important to the future of America’s economy.

When the Federal Communications Commission was founded almost 80 years ago, it was in charge of overseeing a few hundred radio stations and a few million phone lines.  And today, the FCC sits at the center of a communications universe that is growing and changing faster than you can tweet.  And that’s why Julius Genachowski, who is an old buddy from law school, and had so much success in the private sector as well as previously serving in the FCC -- that's why Julius has had one of the toughest jobs in Washington.

Four years ago, Julius set two priorities as chairman of the FCC:  Making high-speed Internet available everywhere, and keeping it open to everyone.  And thanks to his hard work and his leadership, the FCC has made extraordinary progress on both fronts.  We’re helping millions more Americans connect to high-speed Internet.  We’re unleashing the airwaves to support the latest in mobile technology.  We’re protecting the Internet as an open platform for innovation and free speech.  And we’re poised to do even more, thanks to Julius’ efforts. 

So he has been an extraordinary FCC chairman, but Julius has decided to move on to new challenges in the digital frontier.  And so today, it is my great pleasure to nominate Tom Wheeler to take his place.  Give Tom a big round of applause.  (Applause.)

Now, if anybody is wondering about Tom’s qualifications, Tom is the only member of both the cable television and the wireless industry hall of fame.  So he’s like the Jim Brown of telecom, or the Bo Jackson of telecom.  (Laughter.)  And that’s because for more than 30 years, Tom has been at the forefront of some of the very dramatic changes that we’ve seen in the way we communicate and how we live our lives. 

He was one of the leaders of a company that helped create thousands of good, high-tech jobs.  He’s in charge of the group that advises the FCC on the latest technology issues.  He’s helped give American consumers more choices and better products.  So Tom knows this stuff inside and out.  And I think Julius will attest to that because Julius has benefitted frequently from Tom’s input and advice. 

I also want to thank Mignon Clyburn -- where is Mignon?  There she is right there -- who has been an incredible asset to the FCC for the last few years.  (Applause.)  And so Mignon is going to be Acting Chair until Tom is confirmed.  And together, they’ve got a very important mission -- giving businesses and workers the tools they need to compete in the 21st century economy, and making sure we’re staying at the cutting edge of an industry that again and again we’ve revolutionized here in America. 

And as technology continues to shape the way that we do business and communicate and transform the world, we want to make sure that it’s American ingenuity, American innovation, and that we’re setting up legal structures and regulatory structures that facilitate this continued growth and expansion that can create good jobs and continue to grow our economy.

So I just want to thank Julius and his family, his wonderful wife, Rachel, and the entire family for their extraordinary service.  I want to thank Mel, I want to thank Tom and their families for agreeing to step into these new and challenging roles.  And I’m going to go ahead and thank the Senate now for what I’m sure -- (laughter) -- will be a speedy confirmation process so these two gentlemen can get to work right away.

Thank you very much, everybody.

END               
2:36 P.M. EDT

 

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President, The Vice President, The First Lady, Dr. Jill Biden, and Petty Officer David Padilla at Joining Forces Employment Event

East Room
 
 
11:46 A.M. EDT
 
THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Thank you all very much.  My name is Joe Biden, I’m Jill Biden’s husband.  (Laughter.)  And it’s a delight to be here with all of you.
 
Secretary Shinseki, Becky Blank, who is the acting Commerce Secretary, all -- we have Seth Harris here, who is the acting Labor Secretary.  And, Admiral, good to see you, man.  Look at all the brass here.  There’s no reason why we all shouldn’t be here.
 
Look, folks, the truth of the matter is that we’re delighted to welcome you to the White House, but all the business leaders, military leaders, it’s great to have you here -- and veterans.
 
But the truth is we all should be here.  We all should be in this spot at this time because there’s so much work to do.  My colleagues are tired of hearing me say over the last 20 years, we only have one truly sacred obligation in this country.  We have a lot of obligations -- to our children, to the elderly, to the poor.  But there’s only truly sacred obligation in my view, and that's to equip those we send to war and care for those who come home from war and their families.  That's a sacred obligation.
 
This post-9/11 generation -- and I see some folks out there -- well, no one is quite my age.  (Laughter.)  But I see folks out there from the Vietnam generation on, and before.  All made incredible contributions, but this 9/11 generation has been astounding.  Over 3.4 million young women and men have joined our military since 9/11, with almost the certain knowledge that they're likely to be deployed overseas.  1.7 million of those brave women and men have walked across those scorching sands of Iraq or those barren mountains in Afghanistan.  And many of them, as all of you know -- and some of you are among them, including some of the brass here -- didn't just serve once or twice.  Some have served three and four and five deployments.  Pretty incredible.
 
Every day I get a card, and on my schedule card I have them listed on the back -- and, thanks to the Pentagon, we call every day.  I want to know exactly how many lives have been lost and exactly how many people -- how many of our brave soldiers, Marines, Guardsmen, et cetera, how many have been wounded.  As of today, 6,564 have died in those conflicts; 50,651 have been wounded.  And like all of you, I count the one.
 
I know how we would have felt if, God forbid, something happened to our son when he was there a year and someone said, by the way, there are around 6,000 who have died, or there are about 65,000 who have been wounded.  Every single one of these women and men have families, have a story and a future, and many of them still have a future.
 
So this obligation is real, and it’s going to be lasting, and it’s consequential.  The truth of it is these veterans coming home into civilian life are among the most qualified men and women that have ever served our military because of these men up here -- how they -- and women, how they’ve trained them.  They're among the most qualified technically, intellectually.  They're among the most qualified Americans that have ever been available for the job market.  They have the capacity to do virtually any job in the private sector. 
 
You're going to hear from a young man soon who, I will not steal his thunder, but works in an industry where they move a lot of equipment and freight around.  I remember talking to someone at one of these big companies and saying, well, I don't know about so and so; he was talking about a young man.  And I said, man, this kid handled more responsibility and billions dollars' worth of equipment than you own, than you’ll ever own.  (Laughter.)  So don't tell me this kid can't handle the dispatching yard of your trucks.  One of the vehicles he had cost more than all your trucks.  (Laughter.)  
 
And, seriously, think of these kids.  Go to an aircraft carrier.  Watch who is making the judgment as to when that jet aircraft lands down.  It’s a 19-, 20-year-old kid standing there with a flag.  It’s a 19-, 20-year-old kid -- they even let me do it once -- (laughter) -- that sits underneath that as they catapult off.  They can handle anything.  They're technologically proficient.  They're totally responsible.  And they’re undeniably capable.  
 
So what we’re selling here today -- and all of us are selling it -- is an incredible product.  And I want to thank so many of you business leaders here today behind me and out in the audience for recognizing that fact.
 
As the President said, no one who fights for this country overseas should have to come home and fight for a job when they come back home.  They just shouldn’t have to do that.  And that's what you’re all about.  That's what we’re about. 
 
But it’s not just about the returning veterans.  We know there are families, and particularly you men and women in uniform know the sacrifices your families make to allow you to serve.  The English poet John Milton once said, “They also serve who only stand and wait.”  And literally, hundreds of thousands, millions of wives, husbands, sons, daughters, mothers, fathers -- they’ve stood and waited.  And we owe them as well, because they have served as well.  
 
And quite frankly, I’ve never seen my wife, Jill, so absolutely, totally committed to any cause, and that's the cause of serving military families, the cause of serving all of you who served.  I’ve heard her say it once, I’ve heard her say it over the last seven years I don't know how many times:  Everyone, everyone can do something.  Only 1 percent of the population is serving, but 90 percent of the population -- 99 percent owes them just a simple act of kindness.
 
I remember how moved we were when we got a call from our daughter-in-law after a snowstorm the winter our son was deployed.  The next-door neighbor just walked over and shoveled the driveway -- just shoveled the driveway.  Never said a word, packed up, left.  Shoveled the driveway.  We’ve got a lot of driveways to shovel.  We owe an awful lot.  
 
And that's why Michelle and Jill started Joining Forces, and why, with the absolute rock-solid commitment of President Barack Obama behind them, they’ve done, with your help, a remarkable job.  I’m sure you’ll hear the numbers and you will all know the remarkable job that you’ve done and they’ve done responding to the needs of these brave women and men.
 
And now I’d like to introduce you to a woman whose father served, whose sons serve, and who serves us every day -- Jill Biden, Dr. Jill Biden, who happens to be my wife.  (Applause.) 
 
DR. BIDEN:  Thank you, Joe.  Hi, everyone.  I’m Jill Biden, a proud Blue Star mother.  
 
Over the past few years, the First Lady and I have had the incredible honor of meeting military spouses all over this country, and I’m always amazed by their strength, their commitment, and, most importantly, by their resilience.
 
These are spouses like Erin Voirol.  Erin met her husband, Dale, a Sergeant First Class in the Army, when they were both in high school.  Not long after becoming an Army wife, Erin found herself overseas with two young children.  Soon thereafter, her husband deployed for a year.  That was just the beginning.  
 
Over the past 18 years, they have moved their family 10 times.  They are raising three children with Erin providing primary care of the kids during three deployments, each for more than a year.  And today, Dale is stationed at Fort Bragg in North Carolina while Erin and their children stayed in the Hampton Roads area in Virginia so that their kids can finish high school there.  
 
Through all this, Erin pursued her own education, made strong connections with other military spouses, and embraced a wide range of careers, all leading to her current profession of serving other military families.  Erin is the operations manager for two non-profits that provide employment readiness and job-placement assistance for veterans, military spouses, and more.
 
Erin is here with us today.  Erin, would you stand.  Thank you, Erin, for all you do.  Thank you.  (Applause.)
 
Yet stories like Erin’s are not unique among military spouses.  They are people who, when their spouse deploys, are carrying our military families, doing the work of two parents, raising children, running a household.  And military spouses are the first to step up for their communities, whether it’s volunteering to help out a neighbor or serving in the PTA.  All the while they’re building their own careers.  
 
And because our nation’s military spouses move 10 times more than their civilian counterparts, that’s not always easy.  Just as they’re settled into a new job, it might be time to pack up again, move across the country or out of the country, and start the entire process all over again.
 
But of all the things Michelle and I have learned about military spouses, here’s what stands out the most:  They never complain.  Whatever the situation, they keep on serving, doing whatever needs to be done.  Military spouses like Erin have so much to offer -- their skills, their incredible work ethic, and perhaps most of all, their endless energy.  
 
That’s why nearly two years ago, we were proud to launch the Military Spouse Employment Partnership.  This effort has helped spouses build strong resumes, has sponsored hiring fairs and has created mentoring programs.  Since its launch, more than 160 Fortune 500 employers have signed on to the partnership, and more than 43,000 military spouses have been hired.  And more and more companies are finding ways to keep these spouses in their employment, even after they move.  And I’m sure every partnership company will say, if you’re looking for dynamic, resourceful, and highly skilled employees, our military spouses are exactly who you are looking for.  
 
As Joe mentioned just a moment ago, our military spouses serve right along our servicemen and women.  Through Joining Forces, we honor all military service and we ask all Americans to join us in finding ways to show our gratitude.  From the beginning, the private sector has played an important part in supporting the Joining Forces initiative.  
 
Our next speaker is a veteran who has benefited from this private sector involvement.  It is my great pleasure to introduce David Padilla, who served in the United States Navy for five years as a second-class petty officer operations specialist.  And he has a new four-month-old daughter -- month, right?  Four-month-old.  David, thank you for your service to our country.  (Applause.)
 
PETTY OFFICE PADILLA:  Good morning.  My name is David Padilla.  I served honorably for the United States Navy as an operations specialist second-class petty officer.  I served in two deployments -- first, as a database manager in Operation Iraqi Freedom, and second, as an air controller and watch supervisor on an AFRICOM partnership for countries such as Kenya and the Congo.  
 
My time in the Navy taught me invaluable skills:  How to manage a team, work with data, and operate high-tech equipment -- not to mention all the discipline and hard work that comes with wearing that uniform.  But when I came home and started my job search, it felt like companies didn’t see any of that in me.  
 
After returning from the Navy, I applied to countless jobs and was averaging two interviews a week, but nothing ever materialized.  So with the help of the GI Bill, I enrolled at Mercy College in New York where I earned a bachelor’s degree in finance.  Just after I graduated, my fiancée discovered she was pregnant with our beautiful daughter, Emiliana (ph), who is now four months old.  I knew that with a growing family, I needed to double down on my job search, even with a bachelor’s degree.  So I signed up for veterans’ workshops, updated my resume, and attended dozens of job fairs.  But still, I struggled to find work.  
 
In all, I was unemployed for two and a half years before and after college.  But then, thanks to Paralyzed Veterans of America and their PAVE program, which provides support to all veterans who are looking for work, UPS hired me as a dispatch supervisor where I could use my management training I received from the Navy.  And after only four months on the job, UPS recognized my leadership skills and promoted me, where I’m responsible now for dispatching 75 drivers and optimizing our delivery schedule.  
 
UPS has given me the opportunity to build my career and provide financial support for my family.  I want to thank UPS and CEO Scott Davis, who is here today, for giving me this opportunity and making veteran-hiring a priority.  And I also want to salute all the companies here today who are making hiring veterans and their spouses a priority.  I only hope that more companies stand up for families like mine.
 
No one understands this better than our Commander-in-Chief and First Lady.  They have both made it their mission to support our troops, veterans and military families.  And now, I have the great pleasure to introduce them now.  
 
Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome our President, Barack Obama, and First Lady Michelle Obama.  (Applause.)
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  Thank you very much.  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Please, everybody have a seat.  David, thank you so much for your introduction and sharing your story, but most importantly, thanks for your extraordinary service to our nation.  We are very, very proud of you.  
 
Thank you to our partners in crime -- (laughter) -- the outstanding Joe Biden, and the even more outstanding Jill Biden.  (Laughter and applause.)  We're grateful for their leadership, their commitment on a whole range of issues.  But I'm particularly grateful for the passion that Jill, you've shown when it comes to our military families, because you know what it’s like when a loved one is deployed.  And that passion comes through with everything you do.  So we're very, very proud of you. 
 
I also want to recognize the members of my Cabinet and Joint Chiefs and some of our top brass who are here.  We appreciate all the great work that they're doing.  And your presence reflects our commitment to this cause across the entire government.  
 
And now, I've got a simple task this morning, and that is to introduce the graceful, brilliant, inspiring love of my life -- (laughter) -- First Lady Michelle Obama.  Joe and I are just warm-up acts today, which in our families means it’s just another Tuesday.  (Laughter.)  That's how it generally goes.    
 
But of all the honors and privileges of serving as President, the opportunity to meet incredible people like David is among the things that I cherish the most.  David, being here today is representative of a 9/11 generation -- men and women who volunteered to put the uniform on even though they understood it was wartime, knowing full well they could be sent into harm’s way.  
 
And for more than a decade, they have answered every call, executing some of the most dangerous missions on the planet; operating some of the most cutting-edge, complex technologies known to man; leading their peers in moments where their decisions can determine life or death.  And, as we saw during the attacks in Boston, as Guardsmen and as veterans were racing towards danger, they put that courage and experience and skills that they’ve earned serving in our military to use every single day.  George Washington once said, “When we assumed the soldier, we did not lay aside the citizen.”
 
Our troops and our military families who serve right alongside them keep us strong and they keep us safe.  And as Commander-in-Chief, I’ve pledged that just as they’ve left their homes and families to take care of us, we've got to make sure we're taking care of them when they come home.  That’s our sacred obligation:  To make sure that they get the care and the benefits and opportunities that they deserve.  And that includes economic opportunity -- good jobs worthy of their incredible talents.  
 
And as David indicated, unfortunately, when they hit the job market, employers don’t always recognize the high-quality, high-tech skills our newest veterans have gained in the military.  They don't understand the leadership that they've shown under extraordinary circumstances.  So, too often, just when these men and women are looking to move forward in the next chapter of their lives, they’re stuck in neutral, scraping together odd jobs just to pay the bills.  
 
Now, our economy is growing.  It's creating jobs on a consistent basis.  Although I just had a press conference -- we could be doing even better if we'd get a little more cooperation down the street.  But for post-9/11 veterans, employment continues to lag behind the national average -- and that's especially true for our youngest veterans.  And this does not make any sense.  
 
If you can save a life on the battlefield, then you sure as heck can save one in an ambulance in a state-of-the-art hospital.  If you can oversee a convoy of equipment and track millions of dollars of assets, then you can run a company’s supply chain or you can balance its books.  If you can lead a platoon in a war zone, then I think you can lead a team in a conference center.   
 
There are lots of extremely talented young people who are more than qualified for the jobs that businesses are looking to fill.  We've got the end of the Iraq war.  The war in Afghanistan is drawing to a close.  More than 1 million servicemembers are going to be transitioning back to civilian life in the coming years.  So we've got to do everything we can to make sure they have every opportunity to succeed.  
 
That’s why, a year and a half ago, I signed new tax credits for companies that hire unemployed veterans and Wounded Warriors.  And since then, the number of veterans hired through tax credits like these has more than doubled.  And my budgets proposed extending these tax credits permanently.  Congress needs to get that done.  
 
We’re working to help our troops earn the credentials they need for jobs in manufacturing and medicine and transportation.  We strengthened the Post-9/11 GI Bill, helping nearly 1 million veterans and military family members get a college education.  And for the first time in 20 years, we've overhauled the military’s Transition Assistance Program to help our newest veterans compete for those private sector jobs.  Our online Veterans Jobs Bank now has more than 2.5 million searchable job postings.  With our Veterans Gold Card, our veterans receive six months of personalized career counseling.  At my direction, the federal government has hired nearly 250,000 veterans. 
 
So we've made progress, but we know that government alone can't put every veteran and military spouse to work.  So about a year and a half ago, I went down to the Navy Yard and issued a challenge to America’s businesses:  Hire or train 100,000 veterans and military spouses by the end of 2013.  And I am proud to say that these companies stepped up.  And some of those companies are represented here today.  
 
In just a year, businesses had already hired 125,000 veterans or military spouses.  They committed to hiring 250,000 more.  Today, we’re announcing a major milestone in this effort, thanks in large part to the leadership of so many companies that are represented here today.  And we could not be more grateful for the commitments of these companies.  
 
Now, they're doing it partly because it's good business sense, because they're getting great employees.  But they're also doing it because they're patriots.  They're also doing it because they really care about this country and they understand that they don't succeed unless they've got an incredible military that's doing this. 
 
Hiring our veterans and military spouses is not just the patriotic thing to do, it's the smart thing to do.  They're looking for highly skilled workers.  Highly skilled veterans and military spouses are looking for jobs, let’s connect them up.  It’s good for families, it’s good for businesses, it’s good for our country.  
 
And that’s why Joining Forces is so important.  It’s a way for us to both honor and serve the men and women who have served us so well, but also to move the country forward.  That’s why we've all got to step up and do our parts -- government, business, schools, hospitals, community groups, houses of worship, neighbors, and obviously our military and our VA.  We've had to up our game, and we're not there yet, but we continually try to strive to improve to make sure we're doing the right thing.  And just as service and sacrifice defines our military families, serving our military families has to define who we are as Americans.  
 
Now, none of this could have happened had it not been for the extraordinary work that Michelle and Jill have engaged in over the last two years.  And that’s a call that we're renewing here today.  I've got to tell you, I'm proud of my wife all the time.  I could not be prouder of the work that she and Jill have done in this effort.  They have put their heart and their soul into it, they care about it deeply.  They identify so deeply with these military families because they understand the sacrifices that they're making.  
 
So with that, let me introduce a woman who I've seen live out that message every day as a wife and a mother, a tireless champion of military families, love her dearly -- my wife, First Lady Michelle Obama.  (Applause.) 
 
MRS. OBAMA:  Thanks so much.  (Applause.)  Thank you all.  Well, let me start by thanking the President of the United States for that nice introduction.  (Laughter.)  It's always nice to get a good introduction from the President, and from your husband.  But I want to thank you and Joe, because truly, we could not issue these challenges without leadership from the top.  And that’s something that Jill and I always say, is that we're out there on the front lines pushing this initiative, but the only way we get this done is because we've got strong leadership in our President and our Vice President.  
And, of course, to Jill, who is not just an extraordinary partner but a wonderful friend in this endeavor, not just working with our military families but in this interesting life that our husbands have gotten us into.  (Laughter.)  Jill is a true champion, and she's taught me a lot about what it means to serve, what it means to be part of the military community.  And I couldn’t be more grateful.
 
I also want to recognize all of the leaders from the administration, from the military and throughout the country, especially the veterans and military spouses who are here with us today.  Thank you all for your commitment and your service to this nation.  
 
And finally, I want to take a moment to say a special thank you to someone who didn’t know I was going to thank him, but who has been a cornerstone of this effort throughout this year in a difficult time -- when we've been in transition -- these two were running for something -- (laughter) -- but we couldn’t have kept this effort going without Captain Todd Veazie.  (Applause.)  And, believe it or not, today is Todd's last day as our Joining Forces executive director.  That’s another miracle -- the fact that we get so much done with sporadic support like Todd's.
 
And I want to make that point, because it's not just Jill and I, but Todd and a small team of others really keeps this going.  And this year has been a success because of you, so we decided as a reward, we would have you, as your last hurrah, to plan an event with every single one of your bosses -- (laughter) -- because we knew you could pull it off, because that’s what Navy SEALs do, right?  
 
But in Todd, we saw his skill, determination on display every single day.  And I'm just so proud.  We'll miss you here with Joining Forces.  So Todd and I just wanted to say thank you -- or, Barack and I wanted to say thank you.  (Laughter.)  You.  You, too.  (Laughter.)  At least I caught that one.  (Laughter.)  But we are grateful and impressed by your talent, integrity, and the incredible work ethic that you've shown to make this possible.  Todd!  (Applause.)  Very bashful.  We kept that out of the remarks so that you wouldn’t know that it was there.  
 
But really, the same thing can be said -- all those wonderful traits in Todd -- can be said of all the servicemembers and military spouses we have had the honor of meeting over these past four years.  These men and women are some of the most talented, accomplished, dedicated people you will ever meet. 
 
And that’s why, two years ago, when the four of us came together to launch Joining Forces right here in this very room, our goal was to create an initiative that was worthy of their character and their service.  We challenged every segment of our society to stand up and take action and make a real commitment to support and serve our military families.  And since then, this nation has truly joined forces in so many amazing ways. 
 
We have seen doctors and nurses take bold new steps to care for the families affected by PTSD and traumatic brain injuries.  We’ve seen colleges sign up to train teachers to be more responsive to the needs of our military children in their classrooms.  We’ve seen community groups and houses of worship and citizens from every walk of life show their appreciation for our military families, not just with words but with deeds. 
 
And today, we are here to recognize the tremendous efforts of businesses all across the country.  Together, we have been partnering to do everything in our power to help our veterans and military families find the jobs they need and deserve.  
 
These efforts are about so much more than a paycheck.  This is about giving these men and women a source of identity and purpose.  It’s about providing thousands of families with financial security, and giving our veterans and military spouses the confidence that they can provide a better future for their children.  
 
So as we reflect on our accomplishments to date and challenge ourselves to do more, it’s important to remember what’s at stake with all this.  It’s important to remind ourselves every single day what this employment effort is really all about.  
 
And that’s exactly what we did two years ago when the President issued this challenge.  Because every time we looked at those veterans’ unemployment numbers, every time we heard another story about someone who had taken incoming fire on a combat patrol but couldn’t get an HR rep to take their calls, every time we talked to a military spouse who had been transferred far too many times to build a decent career, we became even more determined to make this right. 
 
So with that challenge, we all snapped into action.  And since then, it seems like every week -- quite frankly, every day -- someone new gets involved in this effort.  There hasn’t been a "no" from anyone.  And today, I am thrilled to announce that in less than two years, America’s businesses have hired or trained 290,000 veterans and military spouses -- (applause) -- which is almost triple the original goal with eight months to spare. 
 
And we are also proud to announce that American companies have committed to hire or train another 435,000 of these men and women over the next five years.  (Applause.)  And we are so grateful to all of the business leaders here today who are a part of this effort.  
 
These commitments come from companies of every shape and size.  BNSF Railroad is hiring 5,000 veterans in the next 5 years.  UPS, hiring 25,000.  Home Depot, 55,000.  McDonald’s is hiring 100,000 in the next three years.  Deloitte is doubling its veterans hiring over the next three years.
 
USAA is pledging that 30 percent of its new hires will be veterans or military spouses.  Walmart is telling any veteran who has served honorably that if they want a job in the year after they separate from service, Walmart is going to hire them.  And their goal is to do it within 30 days of the veteran’s application.
 
The Blackstone Group has challenged each of its 50,000 hiring managers at affiliated businesses to hire at least one more veteran.  AT&T is creating an online, military exchange for a group of businesses so that if one company can't hire a veteran at that moment, they can connect them to someone who can.
 
The International Franchise Association has helped more than 4,300 veterans own their own businesses since 2011.  And right now as we speak, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is holding its 400th career fair since last March, fulfilling a commitment that it made to us a year ago.
 
So we are thrilled with all the new, innovative ideas and we’re in awe of the meaningful employment commitments.  But ultimately, these companies aren’t just committing to a number –- they’re committing people, people like David.  Right here in this room, there are so many stories like his.  So I’d like to take just a moment to tell a few of these stories.  And as I call your name, I want you to stand and remain standing. 
 
Staff Sergeant Shaun Murphy, please stand.  Shaun is an eight-year Army veteran who transitioned to become a sixth-grade special-ed teacher in Delaware for three years.  (Applause.)  A little shout-out to Delaware.  He’s working for Teach For America, and today, he has been promoted to lead Teach For America’s nationwide effort to hire more veterans as teachers -- yes, indeed.  He’s doing it all because, as he said, “When you hang up those fatigues and put those boots away, you don’t want to feel like you’ve given up your sense of service.”  
 
And then there’s Staff Sergeant Courtney Beard.  (Applause.)  Courtney has served in the New Jersey Air National Guard for six years, including a deployment in Iraq.  But when she’s not serving on active duty, she’s putting her skills as an intelligence analyst to use at Cisco as a network consulting engineer -- small, but tough.  (Laughter.)  And really smart.  Thank you.  (Applause.)  
 
And then there’s Chryssy Johnson, who is on stage with us.  Chryssy is a mother and an Army wife from San Antonio.  Her family has been transferred three different times over nine years, leaving Chryssy scrambling for jobs at restaurants or call centers or beauty counters.  But USAA gave her a shot to build a career, and today, she is a financial -- a senior financial foundations specialist on her way to earning her MBA.  Yes.  (Applause.)   
 
And then there’s Sergeant Erick Varela.  Erick served in combat infantry for the 82nd Airborne Division, and was deployed two times to the Middle East.  But when he came home to California in the middle of the housing crisis, Erick couldn’t find a job.  And soon, he and his wife found themselves homeless.  
But fortunately, Erick was accepted in an electrical apprenticeship program in San Francisco.  And even though he and his wife were living out of his pickup truck at that time, Erick was able to pinch enough pennies to buy enough gas to drive to and from that class and finish that program.  And today, he’s employed full-time at PG&E, even taking on leadership roles within his crew.  And now, Erick is hoping to buy a home for their growing family.  And we are so proud.  (Applause.)
 
These veterans and military families are talented, resilient, disciplined, and they are ready to do the job no matter what it takes.  And these characteristics connect every single veteran and military spouse in this room.  So I’d like to ask all of our veterans and military spouses here today to please stand if they are able so we can give you all a round of applause.  (Applause.)  Thank you all so much.  
 
Stories like these are not just in this room, but they’re all around us.  Across America and around the world, our men and women in uniform and their families are standing up for us.  They’re standing up for our values, our security, our communities.  And in so many ways, all they’re looking for is another way to serve.  All they need is that next mission.  All they need is a job.  
 
So, to every business leader in this room and throughout the country, I just want you to remember these stories every single day.  Think about all of the skills these men and women possess, all the people they've led, all the risks they've taken and sacrifices they've endured for us.  And then I want you to ask yourselves, what more can you do for these men and women -- what more can you do?  
 
If you own a small business, can you commit to hiring a few veterans, maybe even just one?  If you own a larger company, can you hire a few hundred, maybe a few thousand?  Can you retain the veterans already in your workforce so that they are able to grow within your company?  Can you team up with other businesses to hire more veterans all across this country?
 
And again, I just want to reiterate that my husband and I, we're in this with you.  Jill and Joe, we're in this with you.  We're going to keep working to do what we can to develop new programs and partnerships at the federal level that can help you all put these men and women to work even faster.  Because while we're proud of how far we've come, we know that today is not the finish line.  Today is simply just a mile marker, and we're not going to stop until every single veteran or military spouse that is searching for a job has found one.
 
These men and women have stood up for us again and again and again.  So now the question is, will we do the same for them?  And everything that we have seen in these past two years gives me confidence that the answer is absolutely yes.  You live in a grateful nation, and people will stand up.  
 
So to all the business leaders, I just want to say thank you all.  Thank you for getting us this far.  And to the veterans and military families here in this room and around the country, thank you, again.  We can't thank you enough for your courage and your service.  We will stand with you now and for decades to come.
 
Thank you all.  God bless.
 
 
END
12:30 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

News Conference by the President

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room 
 
 
10:46 A.M. EDT
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Good afternoon -- or good morning, everybody.  I am here to answer questions in honor of Ed Henry, as he wraps up his tenure as president of the White House Correspondents Association.  
 
Ed, because of that, you get the first question.  Congratulations.
 
Q    Thank you, sir, I really appreciate that.  And I hope we can go back to business and being mad at each other a little bit.  (Laughter.)  
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I'm not mad at you.
 
Q    Okay, good.  Thank you, I appreciate that.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  You may be mad at me.  (Laughter.)  
 
Q    I'm not.  A couple of questions on national security.  On Syria, you said that the red line was not just about chemical weapons being used but being spread, and it was a game-changer -- it seemed cut and dry.  And now your administration seems to be suggesting that line is not clear.  Do you risk U.S. credibility if you don't take military action?
 
And then on Benghazi, there are some survivors of that terror attack who say they want to come forward and testify -- some in your State Department -- and they say they’ve been blocked.  Will you allow them to testify?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, first of all, on Syria, I think it’s important to understand that for several years now what we've been seeing is a slowly unfolding disaster for the Syrian people. And this is not a situation in which we've been simply bystanders to what’s been happening.  My policy from the beginning has been that President Assad had lost credibility, that he attacked his own people, has killed his own people, unleashed a military against innocent civilians, and that the only way to bring stability and peace to Syria is going to be for Assad to step down and to move forward on a political transition.
 
In pursuit of that strategy we've organized the international community.  We are the largest humanitarian donor. We have worked to strengthen the opposition.  We have provided nonlethal assistance to the opposition.  We have applied sanctions on Syria.  So there are a whole host of steps that we've been taking precisely because, even separate from the chemical weapons issue, what’s happening in Syria is a blemish on the international community generally, and we've got to make sure that we're doing everything we can to protect the Syrian people.
 
In that context, what I've also said is that the use of chemical weapons would be a game-changer not simply for the United States but for the international community.  And the reason for that is that we have established international law and international norms that say when you use these kinds of weapons you have the potential of killing massive numbers of people in the most inhumane way possible, and the proliferation risks are so significant that we don't want that genie out of the bottle.  So when I said that the use of chemical weapons would be a game-changer, that wasn’t unique to -- that wasn’t a position unique to the United States and it shouldn’t have been a surprise.
 
And what we now have is evidence that chemical weapons have been used inside of Syria, but we don't know how they were used, when they were used, who used them.  We don't have a chain of custody that establishes what exactly happened.  And when I am making decisions about America’s national security and the potential for taking additional action in response to chemical weapon use, I've got to make sure I've got the facts.  That's what the American people would expect.
 
And if we end up rushing to judgment without hard, effective evidence, then we can find ourselves in a position where we can't mobilize the international community to support what we do.  There may be objections even among some people in the region who are sympathetic with the opposition if we take action.  So it’s important for us to do this in a prudent way.
 
And what I've said to my team is we've got to do everything we can to investigate and establish with some certainty what exactly has happened in Syria, what is happening in Syria.  We will use all the assets and resources that we have at our disposal.  We'll work with the neighboring countries to see whether we can establish a clear baseline of facts.  And we've also called on the United Nations to investigate.
 
But the important point I want to make here is that we already are deeply engaged in trying to bring about a solution in Syria.  It is a difficult problem.  But even if chemical weapons were not being used in Syria, we’d still be thinking about tens of thousands of people, innocent civilians -- women, children -- who’ve been killed by a regime that’s more concerned about staying in power than it is about the well-being of its people.
And so we are already deeply invested in trying to find a solution here.  
 
What is true, though, is, is that if I can establish in a way that not only the United States but also the international community feel confident is the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime, then that is a game-changer because what that portends is potentially even more devastating attacks on civilians, and it raises the strong possibility that those chemical weapons can fall into the wrong hands and get disseminated in ways that would threaten U.S. security or the security of our allies.
 
Q    By game-changer you mean U.S. military action?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  By game-changer I mean that we would have to rethink the range of options that are available to us.  
 
Now, we’re already, as I’ve said, invested in trying to bring about a solution inside of Syria.  Obviously, there are options that are available to me that are on the shelf right now that we have not deployed.  And that’s a spectrum of options.  As early as last year, I asked the Pentagon, our military, our intelligence officials to prepare for me what options might be available.  And I won’t go into the details of what those options might be, but clearly that would be an escalation, in our view, of the threat to the security of the international community, our allies, and the United States, and that means that there are some options that we might not otherwise exercise that we would strongly consider.
 
Q    And on the Benghazi portion, I know pieces of this story have been litigated, you’ve been asked about it.  But there are people in your own State Department saying they’ve been blocked from coming forward, that they survived the terror attack and they want to tell their story.  Will you help them come forward and just say it once and for all?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Ed, I’m not familiar with this notion that anybody has been blocked from testifying.  So what I’ll do is I will find out what exactly you’re referring to.  What I’ve been very clear about from the start is that our job with respect to Benghazi has been to find out exactly what happened, to make sure that U.S. embassies not just in the Middle East but around the world are safe and secure, and to bring those who carried it out to justice.  
 
But I'll find out what exactly you're referring to. 
 
Q    They've hired an attorney because they're saying that they've been blocked from coming forward.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I'm not familiar with it.  
 
Jessica.
 
Q    Thank you, Mr. President.  There's a report that your Director of National Intelligence has ordered a broad review -- this is regards to the Boston Marathon bombing -- that your DNI has ordered a broad review of all the intelligence-gathering prior to the attack.  There is also a series of senators -- Susan Collins, Saxby Chambliss, Lindsey Graham -- who allege that all these years after 9/11, there still wasn't enough intelligence shared prior to the attack.  And now, Lindsey Graham, who is a senior member of the Armed Services Committee, has said that Benghazi and Boston are both examples of the U.S. going backwards on national security.  Is he right?  And did our intelligence miss something?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  No, Mr. Graham is not right on this issue, although I'm sure generated some headlines.  
 
I think that what we saw in Boston was state, local, federal officials, every agency rallying around a city that had been attacked -- identifying the perpetrators just hours after the scene had been examined.  We now have one individual deceased, one in custody.  Charges have been brought.  
 
I think that all our law enforcement officials performed in an exemplary fashion after the bombing had taken place.  And we should be very proud of their work, as obviously we're proud of the people of Boston and all the first responders and the medical personnel that helped save lives.
 
What we also know is that the Russian intelligence services had alerted U.S. intelligence about the older brother, as well as the mother, indicating that they might be sympathizers to extremists.  The FBI investigated that older brother.  It's not as if the FBI did nothing.  They not only investigated the older brother, they interviewed the older brother.  They concluded that there were no signs that he was engaging in extremist activity.  So that much we know.
 
And the question then is was there something that happened that triggered radicalization and an actual decision by the brother to engage in the tragic attack we actually saw in Boston, and are there additional things that could have been done in that interim that might have prevented it.  
 
Now, what Director Clapper is doing is standard procedure around here, which is when an event like this happens we want to go back and we want to review every step that was taken.  We want to leave no stone unturned.  We want to see, is there, in fact, additional protocols and procedures that could be put in place that would further improve and enhance our ability to detect a potential attack?  And we won't know that until that review is completed.  We won't know that until the investigation of the actual crime is fully completed.  And that's still ongoing. 
 
But what I can say is that based on what I've seen so far, the FBI performed its duties, the Department of Homeland Security did what it was supposed to be doing.  
 
But this is hard stuff.  And I’ve said for quite some time that because of the pressure that we put on al Qaeda core, because of the pressure that we’ve put on these networks that are well-financed and more sophisticated and can engage in and project transnational threats against the United States, one of the dangers that we now face are self-radicalized individuals who are already here in the United States -- in some cases, may not be part of any kind of network, but because of whatever warped, twisted ideas they may have, may decide to carry out an attack.  And those are in some ways more difficult to prevent.
 
And so what I’ve done for months now is to indicate to our entire counterterrorism team, what more can we do on that threat that is looming on the horizon?  Are there more things that we can do, whether it’s engaging with communities where there’s a potential for self-radicalization of this sort?  Is there work that can be done in terms of detection?  But all of this has to be done in the context of our laws, due process.  
 
And so part of what Director Clapper is doing, then, is going to be to see if we can determine any lessons learned from what happened.
 
Q    Are you getting all the intelligence and information you need from the Russians?  And should Americans be worried when they go to big, public events now?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  The Russians have been very cooperative with us since the Boston bombing.  Obviously, old habits die hard; there are still suspicions sometimes between our intelligence and law enforcement agencies that date back 10, 20, 30 years, back to the Cold War.  But they’re continually improving.  I’ve spoken to President Putin directly.  He’s committed to working with me to make sure that those who report to us are cooperating fully in not only this investigation, but how do we work on counterterrorism issues generally.
 
In terms of the response of the American people, I think everybody can take a cue from Boston.  You don’t get a sense that anybody is intimidated when they go to Fenway Park a couple days after the bombing.  There are joggers right now, I guarantee you, all throughout Boston and Cambridge and Watertown.  And I think one of the things that I’ve been most proud of in watching the country’s response to the terrible tragedy there, is a sense of resilience and toughness, and we’re not going to be intimidated. We are going to live our lives.  
 
And people, I think, understand that we’ve got to do everything we can to prevent these kinds of attacks from taking place, but people also understand -- in the same way they understand after a shooting in Aurora or Newtown or Virginia Tech, or after the foiled attempts in Times Square or in Detroit -- that we’re not going to stop living our lives because warped, twisted individuals try to intimidate us.  We’re going to do what we do -- which is go to work, raise our kids, go to ball games, run in marathons.  And at the same time, we’re going to make sure that everybody is cooperating and is vigilant in doing everything we can, without being naïve, to try to prevent these attacks from happening in the future. 
 
Jonathan Karl.
 
Q    Mr. President, you are a hundred days into your second term.  On the gun bill, you put, it seems, everything into it to try to get it passed.  Obviously, it didn’t.  Congress has ignored your efforts to try to get them to undo these sequester cuts.  There’s even a bill that you threatened to veto that got 92 Democrats in the House voting yes.  So my question to you is do you still have the juice to get the rest of your agenda through this Congress?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  If you put it that way, Jonathan -- (laughter) -- maybe I should just pack up and go home.  Golly.  
I think it’s a little -- as Mark Twain said, rumors of my demise may be a little exaggerated at this point.  
 
We understand that we’re in a divided government right now. The Republicans control the House of Representatives.  In the Senate, this habit of requiring 60 votes for even the most modest piece of legislation has gummed up the works there.  And I think it comes as no surprise not even to the American people, but even members of Congress themselves that right now things are pretty dysfunctional up on Capitol Hill.
 
Despite that, I’m actually confident that there are a range of things that we’re going to be able to get done.  I feel confident that the bipartisan work that’s been done on immigration reform will result in a bill that passes the Senate, passes the House, and gets on my desk.  And that’s going to be a historic achievement.  And I’ve been very complimentary of the efforts of both Republicans and Democrats in those efforts.
 
It is true that the sequester is in place right now.  It’s damaging our economy.  It’s hurting our people.  And we need to lift it.  What’s clear is, is that the only way we’re going to lift it is if we do a bigger deal that meets the test of lowering our deficit and growing our economy at the same time.  And that’s going to require some compromises on the part of both Democrats and Republicans.  
 
I’ve had some good conversations with Republican senators so far.  Those conversations are continuing.  I think there’s a genuine desire on many of their parts to move past not only sequester but Washington dysfunction.  Whether we can get it done or not, we’ll see.  
 
But I think the sequester is a good example -- or this recent FAA issue is a good example.  You will recall that even as recently as my campaign, Republicans we’re saying, sequester is terrible, this is a disaster, it’s going to ruin our military, it’s going to be disastrous for the economy -- we've got to do something about it.  Then, when it was determined that doing something about it might mean that we close some tax loopholes for the wealthy and the well-connected, suddenly, well, you know what, we’ll take the sequester.  And the notion was somehow that we had exaggerated the effects of the sequester -- remember?  The President is crying wolf.  He’s Chicken Little.  The sequester -- no problem.
 
And then in rapid succession, suddenly White House tours -- this is terrible!  How can we let that happen?  Meat inspectors  -- we’ve got to fix that.  And, most recently, what are we going to do about potential delays at airports?
 
So despite the fact that a lot of members of Congress were suggesting that somehow the sequester was a victory for them and this wouldn’t hurt the economy, what we now know is what I warned earlier, what Jay stood up here and warned repeatedly, is happening.  It’s slowed our growth.  It’s resulting in people being thrown out of work.  And it’s hurting folks all across the country.
 
And the fact that Congress responded to the short-term problem of flight delays by giving us the option of shifting money that’s designed to repair and improve airports over the long term to fix the short-term problem -- well, that’s not a solution.  And essentially what we’ve done is we’ve said, in order to avoid delays this summer, we’re going to ensure delays for the next two or three decades.
 
Q    Why’d you go along with it?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Hold on a second.  
 
So the alternative, of course, is either to go ahead and impose a whole bunch of delays on passengers now -- which also does not fix the problem -- or the third alternative is to actually fix the problem by coming up with a broader, larger deal. 
 
But, Jonathon, you seem to suggest that somehow these folks over there have no responsibilities and that my job is to somehow get them to behave.  That’s their job.  They’re elected -- members of Congress are elected in order to do what’s right for their constituencies and for the American people.
 
So if, in fact, they are seriously concerned about passenger convenience and safety, then they shouldn’t just be thinking about tomorrow or next week or the week after that; they should be thinking about what’s going to happen five years from now, 10 years from now, or 15 years from now.  The only way to do that is for them to engage with me on coming up with a broader deal.  And that’s exactly what I’m trying to do -- is to continue to talk to them about are there ways for us to fix this.
 
Frankly, I don’t think that if I were to veto, for example, this FAA bill, that that somehow would lead to the broader fix.  It just means that there would be pain now, which they would try to blame on me, as opposed to pain five years from now.  But either way, the problem is not getting fixed.  
 
The only way the problem does get fixed is if both parties sit down and they say:  How are we going to make sure that we're reducing our deficit sensibly?  How are we making sure that we're investing in things like rebuilding our airports and our roads and our bridges, and investing in early childhood education, basic research -- all the things that are going to help us grow? And that's what the American people want.
 
Just one interesting statistic when it comes to airports.  There was a recent survey of the top airports in the country -- in the world, and there was not a single U.S. airport that came in the top 25.  Not one.  Not one U.S. airport was considered by the experts and consumers who use these airports to be in the top 25 in the world.  I think Cincinnati Airport came in around 30th.
 
What does that say about our long-term competitiveness and future?  And so when folks say, well, there was some money in the FAA to deal with these furloughs -- well, yeah, the money is this pool of funds that are supposed to try to upgrade our airports so we don't rank in the bottom of industrialized countries when it comes to our infrastructure.  
 
And that's what we're doing -- we're using our seed corn short term.  And the only reason we're doing it is because right now we've got folks who are unwilling to make some simple changes to our tax code, for example, to close loopholes that aren't adding to our competitiveness and aren't helping middle-class families.
 
So that's a long way of answering your question, but the point is that there are common-sense solutions to our problems right now.  I cannot force Republicans to embrace those common-sense solutions.  I can urge them to.  I can put pressure on them.  I can rally the American people around those common-sense solutions.  But ultimately, they, themselves, are going to have to say, we want to do the right thing.  
 
And I think there are members certainly in the Senate right now, and I suspect members in the House as well, who understand that deep down.  But they're worried about their politics.  It’s tough.  Their base thinks that compromise with me is somehow a betrayal.  They’re worried about primaries.  And I understand all that.  And we're going to try to do everything we can to create a permission structure for them to be able to do what’s going to be best for the country.  But it’s going to take some time.
 
Bill Plante.
 
Q    Mr. President, as you’re probably aware, there’s a growing hunger strike on Guantanamo Bay among prisoners there.  Is it any surprise really that they would prefer death rather than have no end in sight to their confinement?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, it is not a surprise to me that we've got problems in Guantanamo, which is why when I was campaigning in 2007 and 2008, and when I was elected in 2008, I said we need to close Guantanamo.  I continue to believe that we've got to close Guantanamo.
 
Q    -- can do it? 
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I think it is critical for us to understand that Guantanamo is not necessary to keep America safe. It is expensive.  It is inefficient.  It hurts us in terms of our international standing.  It lessens cooperation with our allies on counterterrorism efforts.  It is a recruitment tool for extremists.  It needs to be closed. 
 
Now, Congress determined that they would not let us close it -- and despite the fact that there are a number of the folks who are currently in Guantanamo who the courts have said could be returned to their country of origin or potentially a third country.  
 
I'm going to go back at this.  I've asked my team to review everything that's currently being done in Guantanamo, everything that we can do administratively.  And I'm going to reengage with Congress to try to make the case that this is not something that's in the best interest of the American people.  And it's not sustainable.  
 
The notion that we're going to continue to keep over a hundred individuals in a no-man's land in perpetuity, even at a time when we've wound down the war in Iraq, we're winding down the war in Afghanistan, we're having success defeating al Qaeda core, we've kept the pressure up on all these transnational terrorist networks, when we've transferred detention authority in Afghanistan -- the idea that we would still maintain forever a group of individuals who have not been tried, that is contrary to who we are, it is contrary to our interests, and it needs to stop.  
 
Now, it's a hard case to make because I think for a lot of Americans the notion is out of sight, out of mind.  And it's easy to demagogue the issue.  That's what happened the first time this came up.  I'm going to go back at it because I think it's important.  
 
Q    Meanwhile we continue to force-feed these folks --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I don't want these individuals to die.  Obviously, the Pentagon is trying to manage the situation as best as they can.  But I think all of us should reflect on why exactly are we doing this?  Why are we doing this?  We've got a whole bunch of individuals who have been tried who are currently in maximum security prisons around the country.  Nothing has happened to them.  Justice has been served.  It's been done in a way that's consistent with our Constitution, consistent with due process, consistent with rule of law, consistent with our traditions.  
 
The individual who attempted to bomb Times Square -- in prison, serving a life sentence.  The individual who tried to bomb a plane in Detroit -- in prison, serving a life sentence.  A Somali who was part of Al-Shabaab, who we captured -- in prison. So we can handle this.  
 
And I understand that in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, with the traumas that had taken place, why, for a lot of Americans, the notion was somehow that we had to create a special facility like Guantanamo and we couldn’t handle this in a normal, conventional fashion.  I understand that reaction.  But we’re now over a decade out.  We should be wiser.  We should have more experience in how we prosecute terrorists.  
 
And this is a lingering problem that is not going to get better.  It’s going to get worse.  It’s going to fester.  And so I’m going to, as I said before, examine every option that we have administratively to try to deal with this issue, but ultimately we’re also going to need some help from Congress, and I’m going to ask some folks over there who care about fighting terrorism but also care about who we are as a people to step up and help me on it. 
 
Chuck Todd.
 
Q    Mr. President, thank you.  Max Baucus, Democratic Senator, referred to the implementation as your health care law as a potential train wreck.  And other Democrats have been whispering nervousness about the implementation and the impact -- and it’s all self-centered a little bit -- the impact that it might have on their own political campaigns in 2014.  Why do you think -- just curious -- why does Senator Baucus, somebody who ostensibly helped write your bill, believe that this is going to be a train wreck?  And why do you believe he’s wrong?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I think that any time you’re implementing something big, there’s going to be people who are nervous and anxious about is it going to get done, until it’s actually done.
 
But let’s just step back for a second and make sure the American people understand what it is that we’re doing.  The Affordable Care Act -- Obamacare -- has now been with us for three years.  It’s gone through Supreme Court tests.  It’s gone through efforts to repeal.  A huge chunk of it has already been implemented.  And for the 85 to 90 percent of Americans who already have health insurance, they’re already experiencing most of the benefits of the Affordable Care Act even if they don’t know it.  Their insurance is more secure.  Insurance companies can’t drop them for bad reasons.  Their kids are able to stay on their health insurance until they’re 26 years old.  They’re getting free preventive care.  
 
So there are a whole host of benefits that, for the average American out there, for the 85 to 90 percent of Americans who already have health insurance, this thing has already happened.  And their only impact is that their insurance is stronger, better, more secure than it was before.  Full stop.  That’s it.  They don’t have to worry about anything else.
 
The implementation issues come in for those who don’t have health insurance -- maybe because they have a preexisting condition and the only way they can get health insurance is to go out on the individual market, and they’re paying 50 percent or 100 percent more than those of us who are lucky enough to have group plans; people who are too poor to get health insurance and the employers don’t offer them.  Maybe they work for a small business and this small business can’t afford right now to provide health insurance. 
 
So all the implementation issues that are coming up are implementation issues related to that small group of people, 10 to 15 percent of Americans -- now, it’s still 30 million Americans, but a relatively narrow group -- who don’t have health insurance right now, or are on the individual market and are paying exorbitant amounts for coverage that isn’t that great.  
 
And what we’re doing is we’re setting up a pool so that they can all pool together and get a better deal from insurance companies.  And those who can’t afford it, we’re going to provide them with some subsidies.  That’s it.  I mean, that’s what’s left to implement, because the other stuff has been implemented and it’s working fine.
 
The challenge is that setting up a market-based system, basically an online marketplace where you can go on and sign up and figure out what kind of insurance you can afford and figuring out how to get the subsidies -- that’s still a big, complicated piece of business.  And when you’re doing it nationwide, relatively fast, and you’ve got half of Congress who is determined to try to block implementation and not adequately funding implementation, and then you’ve got a number of members of -- or governors -- Republican governors -- who know that it’s bad politics for them to try to implement this effectively, and some even who have decided to implement it and then their Republican-controlled state legislatures say, don’t implement, and won’t pass enabling legislation -- when you have that kind of situation, that makes it harder.  
 
But having said all that, we’ve got a great team in place.  We are pushing very hard to make sure that we’re hitting all the deadlines and the benchmarks.  
 
I’ll give you an example, a recent example.  We put together, initially, an application form for signing up for participation in the exchanges that was initially about 21 pages long, and immediately everybody sat around the table and said, well, this is too long.  Especially in this age of the Internet, people aren’t going to have the patience to sit there for hours on end.  Let’s streamline this thing.  So we cut what was a 21-page form now down to a form that’s about three pages for an individual, a little more than that for a family -- well below the industry average.  So those kinds of refinements we’re going to continue to be working on.
 
But I think the main message I want to give to the American people here is, despite all the hue and cry and “sky is falling” predictions about this stuff, if you’ve already got health insurance, then that part of Obamacare that affects you, it’s pretty much already in place.  And that’s about 85 percent of the country.  
 
What is left to be implemented is those provisions to help the 10 to 15 percent of the American public that is unlucky enough that they don’t have health insurance.  And by the way, some of you who have health insurance right now, at some point you may lose your health insurance, and if you’ve got a preexisting condition, this structure will make sure that you are not left vulnerable.
 
But it’s still a big undertaking.  And what we’re doing is making sure that every single day we are constantly trying to hit our marks so that it will be in place.  
 
And the last point I’ll make -- even if we do everything perfectly, there will still be glitches and bumps, and there will be stories that can be written that say, oh, look, this thing is not working the way it’s supposed to, and this happened and that happened.  And that’s pretty much true of every government program that’s ever been set up.  But if we stay with it and we understand what our long-term objective is -- which is making sure that in a country as wealthy as ours, nobody should go bankrupt if they get sick, and that we would rather have people getting regular checkups than going to the emergency room because they don’t have health care -- if we keep that in mind, then we’re going to be able to drive down costs; we’re going to be able to improve efficiencies in the system; we’re going to be able to see people benefit from better health care.  And that will save the country money as a whole over the long term.
 
Q    Do you believe, without the cooperation of a handful of governors, particularly large states like Florida and Texas, that you can fully implement this?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I think it’s harder.  There’s no doubt about it.  
 
Q    But can you do it without them?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  We will implement it.  There will be -- we have a backup federal exchange.  If states aren’t cooperating, we set up a federal exchange so that people can access that federal exchange.  
 
But, yes, it puts more of a burden on us.  And it’s ironic, since all these folks say that they believe in empowering states, that they’re going to end up having the federal government do something that we’d actually prefer states to do if they were properly cooperating.
 
Let’s see how we’re doing on time here.  Last question.  Antonieta Cadiz -- where’s Antonieta?  There you are.  Tell those big guys to get out of your way.  (Laughter.)
 
Q    Thank you, Mr. President.  Two questions.  There are concerns about how the immigration bill from the House has complicated chances for immigration reform in the Senate.  It seems to be a more conservative proposal.  Is there room for a more conservative proposal than the one presented in the Senate? That’s immigration.  
 
Second, on Mexico -- yesterday, the Mexican government said all contact with the U.S. law enforcement will now go through a single door, the Federal Interior Ministry.  Is this change good for the U.S. relationship with Mexico?  Do you think the level of security and cooperation can be maintained?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  On immigration reform, I’ve been impressed by the work that was done by the Gang of Eight in the Senate.  The bill that they produced is not the bill that I would have written, there are elements of it that I would change, but I do think that it meets the basic criteria that I laid out from the start, which is:  We’ve got to have more effective border security -- although it should build on the great improvements that have been made on border security over the last four to five years.  We should make sure that we are cracking down on employers that are gaming the system.  We should make the legal immigration system work more effectively so that the waits are not as burdensome, the bureaucracy is not as complicated, so that we can continue to attract the best and the brightest from around the world to our shores in a legal fashion.  And we want to make sure that we’ve got a pathway to citizenship that is tough, but allows people to earn over time their legal status here in this country.  
 
And the Senate bill meets those criteria -- in some cases not in the way that I would, but it meets those basic criteria.  And I think it’s a testament to the senators that were involved that they made some tough choices and made some tough compromises in order to hammer out that bill.
 
Now, I haven’t seen what members of the House are yet proposing.  And maybe they think that they can answer some of those questions differently or better.  And I think we’ve got to be open-minded in seeing what they come up with.  The bottom line, though, is, is that they’ve still got to meet those basic criteria:  Is it making the border safer?  Is it dealing with employers in how they work with the government to make sure that people are not being taken advantage of, or taking advantage of the system?  Are we improving our legal immigration system?  And are we creating a pathway for citizenship for the 11 million or so who are undocumented in this country?
 
And if they meet those criteria but they’re slightly different than the Senate bill, then I think that we should be able to come up with an appropriate compromise.  If it doesn’t meet those criteria, then I will not support such a bill.  So we’ll have to wait and see.
 
When it comes to Mexico, I’m very much looking forward to taking the trip down to Mexico to see the new President, Peña Nieto.  I had a chance to meet him here, but this will be the first, more extensive consultations and it will be an opportunity for his ministers, my Cabinet members who are participating to really hammer out some of these issues.  
 
A lot of the focus is going to be on economics.  We’ve spent so much time on security issues between the United States and Mexico that sometimes I think we forget this is a massive trading partner responsible for huge amounts of commerce and huge numbers of jobs on both sides of the border.  We want to see how we can deepen that, how we can improve that and maintain that economic dialogue over a long period of time.  
 
That doesn’t mean that we’re not going to be talking about security.  I think that in my first conversation with the President, he indicated to me that he very much continues to be concerned about how we can work together to deal with transnational drug cartels.  We’ve made great strides in the coordination and cooperation between our two governments over the last several years.  But my suspicion is, is that things can be improved.  
 
And some of the issues that he’s talking about really had to do with refinements and improvements in terms of how Mexican authorities work with each other, how they coordinate more effectively, and it has less to do with how they're dealing with us, per se.  So I’m not going to yet judge how this will alter the relationship between the United States and Mexico until I’ve heard directly from them to see what exactly are they trying to accomplish.
 
But, overall, what I can say is that my impression is, is that the new President is serious about reform.  He’s already made some tough decisions.  I think he’s going to make more that will improve the economy and security of Mexican citizens, and that will improve the bilateral relationship as well.  
 
And I don't want to leave out that we’re also going to be talking to, during my visit to Costa Rica, Presidents of Central American countries, many of whom are struggling with both economic issues and security issues, but are important partners for us -- because I think that the vision here is that we want to make sure that our hemisphere is more effectively integrated to improve the economy and security of all people.  That's good for the United States.  That will enhance our economy.  That can improve our energy independence.  
 
There are a whole range of opportunities, and that's going to be the purpose of this trip.  And I’m sure that those of you who will have the chance to travel with me we’ll have a chance to discuss this further.
 
All right?  Thank you very much, everybody.  Thank you, guys.
 
Q    Jason Collins?  Do you want to say anything about it?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Yes, I’ll say something about Jason Collins.  I had a chance to talk to him yesterday.  He seems like a terrific young man.  And I told him I couldn’t be prouder of him.  
One of the extraordinary measures of progress that we’ve seen in this country has been the recognition that the LGBT community deserves full equality -- not just partial equality, not just tolerance, but a recognition that they're fully a part of the American family.
 
And given the importance of sports in our society, for an individual who has excelled at the highest levels in one of the major sports to go ahead and say, this is who I am, I’m proud of it, I’m still a great competitor, I’m still seven foot tall and can bang with Shaq -- (laughter) -- and deliver a hard foul -- and for I think a lot of young people out there who are gay or lesbian who are struggling with these issues, to see a role model like that who is unafraid, I think it’s a great thing.  
 
And I think America should be proud that this is just one more step in this ongoing recognition that we treat everybody fairly, and everybody is part of a family, and we judge people on the basis of their character and their performance and not their sexual orientation.  So I’m very proud of him.
 
All right?  
 
END
11:34 A.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President on the Nomination of Mayor Anthony Foxx as Secretary of Transportation

East Room

2:10 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Thanks.  Thank you.  Everybody, please have a seat. 

AUDIENCE:  Good afternoon.

THE PRESIDENT:  Ray LaHood has said that being the Secretary of Transportation is the best job he ever had in public service.  And that’s fitting because Ray may be the best Secretary of Transportation that the nation’s ever had.

From the day that he was sworn in, Ray has fought tirelessly to rebuild America’s infrastructure -- creating good jobs that strengthen our economy and allow us to better compete in the global economy.  Over the past four years, thanks to Ray's leadership, we’ve built or improved more than 350,000 miles of road -- enough to circle the world more than 14 times.  We’ve upgraded more than 6,000 miles of rail -– enough to go coast to coast and back.  We’ve repaired or replaced more than 20,000 bridges, and helped put tens of thousands of construction workers back on the job.  And that’s all due in no small part to Ray LaHood's leadership. 

So every American can thank Ray for his dedication to make our transportation system not just stronger, but also safer.  When it comes to his focused attention on the dangers of distracted driving, for example, it's saving lives. 

And on a personal note, Ray LaHood has been a good friend of mine for many years.  Before he served in my Cabinet, we served together in Congress.  He’s a Republican; I’m a Democrat.  These days, that sometimes keeps folks apart, but what always brought Ray and I together was a shared belief that those of us who serve in public service owe their allegiance not to party but to the people who elected them to represent them. 

And it helps that we're from the same state -- Ray is from Peoria; I'm from Chicago.  But we both love the state of Illinois, and we both get out there on the golf course -- and we're not that good -- (laughter) -- but we don’t take ourselves too seriously.  He is a good man, and has been an outstanding public servant and a model for the kind of bipartisan approach to governance that I think we need so badly in this town.

So, Ray, on a personal level, I could not be more grateful to you for your service and for your friendship.  (Applause.)

Now, unfortunately for us but fortunately for them, Ray is now looking forward to spending more time with his wife Kathy and their family –- especially a whole gaggle of grandchildren.  And so, today, I’m proud to announce my intent to nominate another impressive leader to carry on his great work at the Department of Transportation:  the Mayor of Charlotte, my friend from North Carolina, Mr. Anthony Foxx.  (Applause.)  

Anthony’s life reflects the values he learned growing up in West Charlotte, where he was raised by his single mom and his grandparents.  I should add, by the way, that his grandmother is here, and she informed me that she worked here in the White House in the Truman administration.  So she's just coming back to -- (applause) -- she's just coming back for a visit.  And so, the values that they instilled in them was to take pride in hard work, to take responsibility for your actions, to take care of your community.  And over the past three and a half years, those values have helped Anthony become one of the most effective mayors that Charlotte's ever seen.

When Anthony became mayor in 2009, Charlotte, like the rest of the country, was going through a bruising economic crisis.  But the city has managed to turn things around.  The economy is growing.  There are more jobs, more opportunity.  And if you ask Anthony how that happened, he’ll tell you that one of the reasons is that Charlotte made one of the largest investments in transportation in the city’s history. 

Since Anthony took office, they’ve broken ground on a new streetcar project that’s going to bring modern electric tram service to the downtown area.  They’ve expanded the international airport.  And they’re extending the city’s light rail system.  All of that has not only helped create new jobs, it’s helped Charlotte become more attractive to business.

So I know Anthony’s experience will make him an outstanding Transportation Secretary.  He’s got the respect of his peers, mayors and governors all across the country.  And as a consequence, I think that he’s going to be extraordinarily effective.  One of the things that Ray taught me in watching him do his job is that establishing personal relationships with mayors and governors and county executives makes all the difference in the world, because transportation is one of those things that -- it’s happening on the ground. 

And the federal government has got to be responsive and has to understand what it’s like when you’re a mayor or a governor or a county executive trying to get these projects up and running, which also means that we have the potential of continuing to streamline our approvals and get rid of some -- sometimes difficulties in permitting that slow projects down, because we want to get people back to work and we want to get this country moving. 

So I am absolutely confident that Anthony is going to do an outstanding job.  I want to thank his mom and grandma and lovely wife and two good-looking kids for being willing to serve as well.  And I hope that the Senate confirms him quickly because we’ve got a lot of work to do. 

Our top priority as a nation right now is doing everything we can to grow our economy and create good jobs and rebuild opportunity for the middle class.  And one of the best ways we can do that is to put more Americans back to work rebuilding our infrastructure. 

So that’s why, in my State of the Union Address, I proposed a “Fix-It-First” program to put more people to work as soon as possible on our most urgent repairs.  And to make sure taxpayers don’t shoulder the entire burden, I’ve also proposed a partnership with the private sector.  But Congress has to step up, fund these projects.  They need to do it right away.

We need to modernize the infrastructure that powers our economy.  We need more high-speed rail, and Internet, and high-tech schools, and self-healing power grids, and bridges, and tunnels, and ports that help us ship products all around the world stamped with three proud words:  Made in America.  That’s how we’re going to attract more businesses.  That’s how we’re going to create more jobs.  That’s how we’re going to stay competitive in this global economy.

So to Ray LaHood and his entire family, I want to thank you for just doing an extraordinary job.  To Anthony and his family, I want to thank you guys for agreeing to serve.  And I know that today’s announcement is not the biggest thing that Anthony’s family’s got going on in the next week, because tomorrow is Anthony’s birthday.  (Laughter.)  So we’re happy that we can kick off the celebration here at the White House. 

And with that, what I’d like to do is ask both of them to say a few words, starting with our outstanding current Secretary of Transportation, Mr. Ray LaHood.  (Applause.)

END                
2:18 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the First Lady

Remarks by the First Lady at White House Forum on Military Credentialing and Licensing

South Court Auditorium

11:11 A.M. EDT
 
MRS. OBAMA:  Good morning.  (Applause.)  Good morning, everyone.  Thanks so much.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Please, sit, rest.  Because we want you to do a lot of work today, so we don’t want you to wear yourselves out.
 
It is a true pleasure to be here today.  I want to start by thanking Sergeant Hall for that very kind introduction, but, more importantly, for his outstanding service to this country.  I also want to recognize Gene Sperling for his excellent work on this issue here at the White House.
 
And of course, I want to thank John Chambers and everyone at Cisco for their extraordinary leadership to create this new IT Training and Certification Program.  So let’s just take a moment to give them a round of applause for their excellent work.  Very proud, very proud.  (Applause.)  This is the kind of leadership that is going to make the world of difference to hundreds of thousands of veterans and military families across this country.
 
And finally, I want to thank all of you for taking the time.  This is a big commitment on the part of everyone in this room, to work on this issue.  Because, as you all know, we’re here today to address one of the most pressing issues we face -- not just for our veterans and our military families, but for our economy and for the future of our country.
 
You all know the numbers.  As John said, in the coming years, more than one million servicemembers will be hanging up their uniforms and transitioning to civilian life.  And that’s on top of the hundreds of thousands of veterans and military spouses already out there looking for work.
 
These folks, as you have heard, you have seen, you will continue to see -- they are some of the most highly skilled, best-trained, hardest-working, diligent, dedicated, proud, noble, smart people that we have in this country.  And believe me, I have met with hundreds of them in the course of my service as First Lady, and it has been one of the greatest privileges -- not just to work with the men and women in uniform, but with their family members who are just as outstanding.
 
They do everything.  They are medics and engineers, they're drivers, welders.  They’re folks like Sergeant Hall, with years of experience at the highest levels of our military.  And they are eminently qualified to do the very jobs that employers across this country are desperate to fill.
 
But too often, because of red tape, or outdated rules, or simple lack of coordination, our men and women in uniform come home only to find that the training and experience they’ve gotten during their time in uniform simply doesn’t count.  Or they discover that the credits that they’ve earned in military courses don’t actually transfer when they enroll in college, so they’re turned away from jobs that they’re more than qualified to do.  Or they wind up paying to do the same coursework over again, and all that training, all that education, all that expertise that they have devoted their lives to attain, it all goes to waste.
 
And this is unfair to the men and women who have served this country so bravely.  They deserve a fair shot at a good job when they come home.  But it’s also unfair to their families who have sacrificed probably more in some instances so that these men and women can do their job.  And they deserve some financial security once they return to civilian life.
 
It is also unfair to this country, because when we don’t take advantage of the skills and talents of our veterans and military spouses, jobs go unfilled and, far worse, human potential goes untapped.  And that’s bad for our economy, as we all know.
 
Now fortunately, in recent months we’ve seen leaders across this country starting to solve this problem.  We have seen dozens of governors and state legislators passing laws that clear away all the red tape so that veterans and military spouses can get the licenses they need for the jobs they’re qualified for.  And that’s really a big deal.  It’s not a small task.
 
But the truth is that changing our laws is truly just the beginning.  Because even the best laws in the world won’t make a difference until companies are actually making those job offers, schools are accepting those credits, and our veterans and military spouses are actually collecting those paychecks that they need to take care of their families.
 
So at the end of the day, whether or not we solve this problem in so many ways is up to the men and women in this room.  That’s why we’ve invited you to the White House today to participate in these roundtables.
 
So today, I hope that you will start working together to figure out where the gaps are and how we can work together to close those gaps.  If you have a program or a curriculum that’s working at your school or your hospital or your company, we really want you to share the information here.  Tell people about it.  Be proud of it.  Share your materials so that others can replicate what you’re doing in communities across this country.  Because we have to be prepared to accept our military members, our veterans and servicemembers wherever they land in this country after their service.
 
If you think there are courses or certifications that our military should be offering to better prepare members to transition, or you think they need to revise what they’re currently offering to make it more relevant, don’t be shy.  Speak up.  Let them know.  They're used to getting good, strong feedback.  (Laughter.)  They're tough.
 
We have representatives from the Department of Defense and across the federal government who have come here today for exactly that reason –- because they want to hear your thoughts and they want to learn, and grow, and develop and make sure that we’re all working together.
 
In short, today is your chance to make the connections, form the partnerships that our veterans and military families need and deserve.  And remember, it was roundtables like these that led to the creation of the IT Training and Certification Partnership that we are announcing today.  It was this kind of work that led to this initiative.  And I hope you all will use this partnership as a model, because it is an outstanding example of what can happen when industries come together with our armed forces on behalf of our veterans.
 
As you’ve heard, this new partnership will provide up to 161,000 servicemembers with the chance to gain the certifications they need for 12 different high-demand, high-paying technology careers -– everything from IT security analysts to computer programmers to quality assurance engineers.
 
And that’s exactly the kind of impact that we’re aiming for through these conversations today.  And I also just want to say that this isn’t going to be a one-and-done kind of event.  This is the beginning.  We have directed federal agencies to host a series of follow-up meetings with the goal of creating partnerships in all four of the areas that we’re focusing on today.
 
Again, this is just the beginning.  Because once we’ve made it easier for veterans and military spouses to get the jobs they deserve, we need to make sure that companies are actually creating those jobs.  And that’s why tomorrow, here at the White House, we will be announcing groundbreaking commitments by companies across this country to hire even more of our veterans and military spouses.
 
And a thing I will say, because this is a commitment that comes from the top and it comes from our hearts:  We are not going to stop until all of our veterans and all of our military families have good jobs -- the good jobs they deserve, the good jobs that they've earned, jobs that will help them build their careers and create a better future for their children.
 
We're not going to stop.  Because in the end, that’s really what this is all about.  In the end, if we keep on working together and building these public-private partnerships, then I know that we’ll be able to serve our veterans and military families as well as they have served this country.  And that's what it's all about.
 
We are so proud of them, but we're also proud of the work that our companies have done, the way people have been stepping up without question.  It's going to take a little more work because we've got millions of people to employ, but I am confident that these kind of roundtables will move the ball forward.
 
So I thank you all again, and I wish you good luck and hard work today as we continue the work of utilizing the resources of our military and their families.  Thank you all.  God bless.  Good luck.  (Applause.)
 
END
11:21 A.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President on the 150th Anniversary of the National Academy of Sciences

National Academy of Sciences
Washington, D.C.

11:30 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much.  Thank you so much.  (Applause.)  Please, everybody have a seat. 

Well, it’s good to be back.  Good morning, everybody, and thank you, Dr. Cicerone, for the kind introduction and the great work that you do.  The good doctor was reminding me that the first time I came here, apparently joking, I warned him and John Holdren not to age too much in their jobs.  And it turns out I'm the guy who’s aged.  (Laughter.)  They look great.

But, as always, it’s an honor to join our nation’s preeminent scholars, including my own Science Advisor, John Holdren, to celebrate the 150th anniversary of the National Academy of Sciences.  And since I did not do well enough in chemistry or physics to impress you much on those topics, let me instead tell a story.

One hundred and fifty years ago, the nation, as all of you know, was in the midst of the Civil War, and the Union had recently suffered a devastating defeat at Fredericksburg.  The road ahead seemed long and uncertain.  Confederate advances in weapons technology cast a dark shadow on the Union.

The previous spring, in the waters outside of Hampton Roads, the ironclad Confederate battleship Virginia had sunk two wooden Union ships and advanced on a third, and this endangered the Union blockade of Virginia and threatening Union forces along the Potomac River.  And then, overnight, the USS Monitor, an ironclad herself, arrived and fought the Virginia to a draw in the world’s first battle between iron-sided ships.

There was no victor, but the era of ironclad warfare had begun.  And it brought unexpected challenges for President Lincoln and his Navy as they expanded this fleet in early 1863, because aboard their new iron-side battleships, sailors found that the iron siding made the ships’ compasses unpredictable, so it skewed navigation, and they were bumping into things and going the wrong way.  (Laughter.)  So the basic physics of magnetism undermined the usefulness of the ironclad vessels, even as the Confederates were stocking up on them. 

And that’s where your predecessors came in.  Because in March of 1983 -- 1863, rather -- President Lincoln and Congress established the National Academy of Sciences as an independent and nonprofit institution charged with the mission to provide the government with the scientific advice that it needed.  And this was advice that was particularly useful in the thick of battle. 

The National Academy soon counted the nation’s top scientists as members.  They quickly got to work.  By the next year, they were inspecting the Union’s ironclads and installing an array of bar magnets around the compasses to correct their navigation.  So right off the bat, you guys were really useful.  (Laughter.)  In fact, it’s fair to say we might not be here had you not -- (laughter) -- certainly I would not be here.  (Laughter and applause.)

Now, political leaders have long recognized the connection between technology and warfare throughout our human history.  Sadly, this is an element of the human condition.  We take our wars very seriously and we're always looking for new ways to engage in a war.  But President Lincoln founded the Academy with a mandate that went far beyond the science and technology of war. Even as the nation was at war with itself, President Lincoln had the wisdom to look forward, and he recognized that finding a way to harness the highest caliber scientific advice for the government would serve a whole range of long-term goals for the nation. 

It was the same foresight that led him to establish land-grant colleges and finish the Transcontinental Railroad -- the idea that the essence of America is this hunger to innovate, this restlessness, this quest for the next big thing.  And although much of this innovation would be generated by the powers of our free market, the investments and the convening power of the federal government could accelerate discovery in a way that would continually push the nation forward. 

That's our inheritance, and now the task falls to us.  We, too, face significant challenges -- obviously not of the magnitude that President Lincoln faced, but we've got severe economic and security and environmental challenges.  And what we know from our past is that the investments we make today are bound to pay off many times over in the years to come. 

So we will continue to pursue advances in science and engineering, in infrastructure and innovation, in education and environmental protection -- especially science-based initiatives to help us minimize and adapt to global threats like climate change.

And I’m confident we’ll meet that task because we’ve got you -- brilliant and committed scientists to help us guide the way.  And part of what’s made the Academy so effective is that all the scientists elected to your elite ranks are volunteers -- which is fortunate because we have no money anyway.  (Laughter.)  For 150 years, you’ve strived to answer big questions, solve tough problems, not for yourselves but for the benefit of the nation.  And that legacy has endured from the Academy’s founding days.  And when you look at our history, you’ve stepped up at times of enormous need and, in some cases, great peril. 

When Woodrow Wilson needed help understanding the science of military preparedness, he asked the Academy’s eminent scientists to lay it out for him.  When George W. Bush, more recently, wanted to study the long-term health effects of traumatic brain injuries suffered by soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, he set your scholars to the task.  Today, my administration relies on your expertise to answer critical questions like:  How do we set our priorities for research?  How can we get the most out of the nanotechnology revolution?  What are the underlying causes of gun violence?

And more important than any single study or report, the members of this institution embody what is so necessary for us to continue our scientific advance and to maintain our cutting-edge, and that’s restless curiosity and boundless hope, but also a fidelity to facts and truth, and a willingness to follow where the evidence leads. 

And I’d like to acknowledge the other organizations that have been obviously very important in this whole process -- the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine -- all who’ve contributed similar leadership in maintaining the tradition, upholding the highest standard of science. 

And, by the way, we do have colleagues in Congress who believe in science and believe in evidence.  One of them is here, Congress Rush Holt.  We’re very grateful to him for his outstanding work.  (Applause.)  And I want to thank many of the members of my administration, as well as PCAST, my -- I always forget what exactly it stands for but -- (laughter) -- it’s my smart science people -- (laughter) -- who have contributed enormously to the work that we’re doing on a whole range of issues, from energy to advanced manufacturing, have really been extraordinary.  I want to thank the members of my administration who are here as well who all are invested in making sure that we keep American science the best in the world. 

Now, the good news is America remains a world leader in patents and scientific discovery.  Our university system is the crown jewel of our economy as well as our civilization.  And that’s what’s allowing us to continually replenish our stock of people who are willing to dream big dreams and reach higher than anybody else. 

And what I want to communicate to all of you is, is that as long as I’m President, we’re going to continue to be committed to investing in the promising ideas that are generated from you and your institutions, because they lead to innovative products, they help boost our economy, but also because that’s who we are.  I’m committed to it because that’s what makes us special and ultimately what makes life worth living. 

And that’s why we’re pursuing “grand challenges” like making solar energy as cheap as coal, and building electric vehicles as affordable as the ones that run on gas.  And earlier this month, I unveiled the BRAIN initiative, which will give scientists the tools that they need to get a dynamic picture of the brain in action, and better understand how we think and learn and remember. 

Today, all around the country, scientists like you are developing therapies to regenerate damaged organs, creating new devices to enable brain-controlled prosthetic limbs, and sending sophisticated robots into space to search for signs of past life on Mars.  That sense of wonder and that sense of discovery, it has practical application but it also nurtures what I believe is best in us. 

And right now, we’re on the brink of amazing breakthroughs that have the chance, the potential to change life for the better -- which is why we can’t afford to gut these investments in science and technology.  Unfortunately, that’s what we’re facing right now.  Because of the across-the-board cuts that Congress put in place -- the sequester, as it’s known in Washington-speak -- it’s hitting our scientific research.  Instead of racing ahead on the next cutting-edge discovery, our scientists are left wondering if they’ll get to start any new projects, any new research projects at all over the next few years, which means that we could lose a year, two years of scientific research as a practical matter because of misguided priorities here in this town. 

With the pace of technological innovation today, we can’t afford to stand still for a year or two years or three years.  We’ve got to seize every opportunity we have to stay ahead.  And we can’t let other countries win the race for ideas and technology of the future.  And I say that, by the way, not out of just any nationalistic pride -- although, obviously, that’s part of it -- but it’s also because nobody does it better than we do when it’s adequately funded, when it’s adequately supported.  And what we produce here ends up having benefits worldwide.  We should be reaching for a level of private and public research and development investment that we haven’t seen since the height of the Space Race.  That’s my goal.

And it’s not just resources.  I mean, one of the things that I've tried to do over these last four years and will continue to do over the next four years is to make sure that we are promoting the integrity of our scientific process; that not just in the physical and life sciences, but also in fields like psychology and anthropology and economics and political science -- all of which are sciences because scholars develop and test hypotheses and subject them to peer review -- but in all the sciences, we’ve got to make sure that we are supporting the idea that they’re not subject to politics, that they’re not skewed by an agenda, that, as I said before, we make sure that we go where the evidence leads us.  And that’s why we’ve got to keep investing in these sciences. 

And what’s true of all sciences is that in order for us to maintain our edge, we’ve got to protect our rigorous peer review system and ensure that we only fund proposals that promise the biggest bang for taxpayer dollars.  And I will keep working to make sure that our scientific research does not fall victim to political maneuvers or agendas that in some ways would impact on the integrity of the scientific process.  That’s what’s going to maintain our standards of scientific excellence for years to come.

That’s why, by the way, one of the things that I’ve focused on as President is an all-hands-on-deck approach to the sciences, as well as technology and engineering and math.  And that’s why we’re spending a lot of time focused on the next generation.  With the help of John Holdren and everybody who’s working with my administration, we want to make sure that we are exciting young people around math and science and technology and computer science.  We don’t want our kids just to be consumers of the amazing things that science generates; we want them to be producers as well.  And we want to make sure that those who historically have not participated in the sciences as robustly -- girls, members of minority groups here in this country -- that they are encouraged as well.

We’ve got to make sure that we’re training great calculus and biology teachers, and encouraging students to keep up with their physics and chemistry classes.  That includes Malia and Sasha.  (Laughter.)  It means teaching proper research methods and encouraging young people to challenge accepted knowledge.  It means expanding and maintaining critical investments in biomedical research and helping innovators turn their discoveries into new businesses and products.  And it means maintaining that spirit of discovery. 

Last week, I got a chance to do one of my favorite things as President and that is -- we started these White House Science Fairs.  And these kids are remarkable.  I mean, I know you guys were smart when you were their age, but -- (laughter) -- I might give them the edge.  (Laughter.)  I mean, you had young people who were converting algae into sustainable biofuels -- that was one of my favorites because the young lady had -- she kept the algae under her bed -- and she had a whole lab, which meant that she had really supportive parents.  (Laughter.)  I pictured it bubbling out and starting to creep into the hallways.  (Laughter.) 

You had young people who were purifying water with bicycle-power-generated batteries.  You had young people who had already devised faster and cheaper tests for cancer.  These are 15, 16-year-olds. 

They were all dreaming to grow up and be just like you -- maybe with a little less gray hair -- (laughter) -- but they shared your passion.  They shared that excitement.  And what was interesting was not only did they share that sense of wonder and discovery, but they also shared this fundamental optimism that if you figured this stuff out, people’s lives would be better; that there were no inherent barriers to us solving the big problems that we face as long as we were diligent and focused and observant and curious. 

And we’ve got to make sure that we’re supporting that next generation of dreamers and risk-takers -- because if we are, things will be good.  They leave me with extraordinary optimism. They leave me hopeful.  They put a smile on my face.  And I’m absolutely convinced that if this Academy and the successors who become members of this Academy are there at the center and the heart of our public debate, that we’ll be able to continue to use the innovation that powers our economy and improves our health, protects our environment and security, that makes us the envy of the world. 

So I want to thank you on behalf of the American people.  And I want to make sure that you know that you’ve got a strong supporter in the White House. 

God bless you.  God bless the United States of America.  Thank you.  (Applause.)

END
11:50 A.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by The President at The White House Correspondents' Association Dinner

Washington Hilton Hotel, Washington, D.C.

10:14 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. (Applause.) Thank you, everybody. (Laughter.) How do you like my new entrance music? (Applause.) Rush Limbaugh warned you about this -- second term, baby. (Laughter and applause.) We’re changing things around here a little bit. (Laughter.)

Actually, my advisors were a little worried about the new rap entrance music. (Laughter.) They are a little more traditional. They suggested that I should start with some jokes at my own expense, just take myself down a peg. I was like, guys, after four and a half years, how many pegs are there left? (Laughter.)

I want to thank the White House Correspondents. Ed, you’re doing an outstanding job. We are grateful for -- (applause) -- the great work you’ve done. To all the dignitaries who are here, everybody on the dais -- I especially want to say thank you to Ray Odierno, who does outstanding service on behalf of our country, and all our men and women in uniform every single day. (Applause.)

And of course, our extraordinary First Lady, Michelle Obama. (Applause.) Everybody loves Michelle. (Laughter.) She’s on the cover of Vogue, high poll numbers. But don’t worry -- I recently got my own magazine cover. (Laughter.)

Now, look, I get it. These days, I look in the mirror and I have to admit, I’m not the strapping young Muslim socialist that I used to be. (Laughter.) Time passes. You get a little gray. (Laughter.)

And yet, even after all this time, I still make rookie mistakes. Like, I’m out in California, we’re at a fundraiser, we’re having a nice time. I happen to mention that Kamala Harris is the best-looking attorney general in the country. (Laughter.) As you might imagine, I got trouble when I got back home. (Laughter.) Who knew Eric Holder was so sensitive? (Laughter and applause.)

And then there’s the Easter Egg Roll, which is supposed to be just a nice, fun event with the kids. I go out on the basketball court, took 22 shots -- made two of them. (Laughter.) That’s right: two hits, 20 misses. The executives at NBC asked, “What’s your secret?” (Laughter and applause.)

So, yes, maybe I have lost a step. But some things are beyond my control. For example, this whole controversy about Jaz-Z going to Cuba -- it’s unbelievable. I’ve got 99 problems and now Jay-Z is one. (Laughter and applause.) That’s another rap reference, Bill. (Laughter.) I’ll let you know. (Applause.)

Of course, everybody has got plenty of advice. Maureen Dowd said I could solve all my problems if I were just more like Michael Douglas in “The American President.” (Laughter.) And I know Michael is here tonight. Michael, what’s your secret, man? (Laughter.) Could it be that you were an actor in an Aaron Sorkin liberal fantasy? (Laughter.) Might that have something to do with it? (Applause.) I don’t know. Check in with me. Maybe it’s something else. (Laughter.)

Anyway, I recognize that this job can take a toll on you. I understand -- second term, you need a burst of new energy, try some new things. And my team and I talked about it. We were willing to try anything. So we borrowed one of Michelle’s tricks. (Laughter and applause.) I thought this looked pretty good, but no bounce. (Laughter.)

I want to give a shout-out to our headliner, Conan O’Brien. (Applause.) I was just talking to Ed, and I understand that when the Correspondents’ Association was considering Conan for this gig, they were faced with that age-old dilemma: Do you offer it to him now, or wait for five years and then give it to Jimmy Fallon? (Laughter.) That was a little harsh. (Laughter.) I love Conan.

And of course, the White House press corps is here. I know CNN has taken some knocks lately, but the fact is I admire their commitment to cover all sides of a story, just in case one of them happens to be accurate. (Laughter and applause.)

Some of my former advisors have switched over to the dark side. For example, David Axelrod now works for MSNBC, which is a nice change of pace since MSNBC used to work for David Axelrod. (Laughter.)

The History Channel is not here. I guess they were embarrassed about the whole Obama-is-a-devil thing. (Laughter.) Of course, that never kept Fox News from showing up. (Laughter.) They actually thought the comparison was not fair -- to Satan. (Laughter and applause.)

But the problem is, is that the media landscape is changing so rapidly. You can’t keep up with it. I mean, I remember when BuzzFeed was just something I did in college around 2:00 a.m. (Laughter.) It’s true. (Laughter.)

Recently, though, I found a new favorite source for political news -- these guys are great. I think everybody here should check it out, they tell it like it is. It’s called whitehouse.gov. (Laughter.) I cannot get enough of it.

The fact is I really do respect the press. I recognize that the press and I have different jobs to do. My job is to be President; your job is to keep me humble. Frankly, I think I’m doing my job better. (Laughter and applause.)

But part of the problem is everybody is so cynical. I mean, we’re constantly feeding cynicism, suspicion, conspiracies. You remember a few months ago, my administration put out a photograph of me going skeet shooting at Camp David? You remember that? And quite a number of people insisted that this had been photoshopped. But tonight I have something to confess: You were right. Guys, can we show them the actual photo? (Laughter.) We were just trying to tone it down a little bit. (Laughter.) That was an awesome day. (Laughter.)

There are other new players in the media landscape as well, like super PACs. Did you know that Sheldon Adelson spent $100 million of his own money last year on negative ads? You’ve got to really dislike me -- (laughter) -- to spend that kind of money. I mean, that’s Oprah money. (Laughter.) You could buy an island and call it “Nobama” for that kind of money. (Laughter.) Sheldon would have been better off offering me $100 million to drop out of the race. (Laughter and applause.) I probably wouldn’t have taken it, but I'd have thought about it. (Laughter.) Michelle would have taken it. (Laughter.) You think I’m joking? (Laughter.)

I know Republicans are still sorting out what happened in 2012, but one thing they all agree on is they need to do a better job reaching out to minorities. And look, call me self-centered, but I can think of one minority they could start with. (Laughter.) Hello? Think of me as a trial run, you know? (Laughter.) See how it goes. (Laughter.)

If they won’t come to me, I will come to them. Recently, I had dinner -- it’s been well publicized -- I had dinner with a number of the Republican senators. And I’ll admit it wasn’t easy. I proposed a toast -- it died in committee. (Laughter.)

Of course, even after I've done all this, some folks still don’t think I spend enough time with Congress. "Why don’t you get a drink with Mitch McConnell?" they ask. Really? (Laughter.) Why don’t you get a drink with Mitch McConnell? (Laughter and applause.) I'm sorry. I get frustrated sometimes.

I am not giving up. In fact, I'm taking my charm offensive on the road -- a Texas barbeque with Ted Cruz, a Kentucky bluegrass concert with Rand Paul, and a book-burning with Michele Bachmann. (Laughter and applause.)

My charm offensive has helped me learn some interesting things about what's going on in Congress -- it turns out, absolutely nothing. (Laughter.) But the point of my charm offensive is simple: We need to make progress on some important issues. Take the sequester. Republicans fell in love with this thing, and now they can't stop talking about how much they hate it. It's like we're trapped in a Taylor Swift album. (Laughter.)

One senator who has reached across the aisle recently is Marco Rubio, but I don’t know about 2016. I mean, the guy has not even finished a single term in the Senate and he thinks he's ready to be President. (Laughter and applause.) Kids these days.

I, on the other hand, have run my last campaign. On Thursday, as Ed mentioned, I went to the opening of the Bush Presidential Library in Dallas. It was a wonderful event, and that inspired me to get started on my own legacy, which will actually begin by building another edifice right next to the Bush Library -- can we show that, please? (Laughter.)

I'm also hard at work on plans for the Obama Library. And some have suggested that we put it in my birthplace, but I'd rather keep it in the United States. (Laughter.) Did anybody not see that joke coming? (Laughter.) Show of hands. Only Gallup? Maybe Dick Morris? (Laughter and applause.)

Now, speaking of presidents and their legacies, I want to acknowledge a wonderful friend, Steven Spielberg, and Daniel Day-Lewis, who are here tonight. (Applause.) We had a screening of their most recent film, Lincoln, which was an extraordinary film. I am a little nervous, though, about Steven's next project. I saw a behind-the-scenes look on HBO -- well, let's just check it out. Roll the tape.

(Video is shown.) (Laughter and applause.)

It's a remarkable transformation. Do I really sound like that, though, honey? (Laughter.)

Groucho Marx once said -- and, Senator Cruz, that’s Groucho Marx, not Karl. That’s the other guy. (Laughter.) Groucho Marx once told an audience, "Before I speak, I have something important to say." (Laughter.) And along those same lines, I want to close on a more serious note.

Obviously, there has been no shortage of news to cover over these past few weeks. And these have been some very hard days for too many of our citizens. Even as we gather here tonight, our thoughts are not far from the people of Boston and the people of West, Texas. There are families in the Midwest who are coping with some terrible floods. So we've had some difficult days.

But even when the days seemed darkest, we have seen humanity shine at its brightest. We've seen first responders and National Guardsmen who have dashed into danger, law enforcement officers who lived their oath to serve and to protect, and everyday Americans who are opening their homes and their hearts to perfect strangers.

And we also saw journalists at their best -- especially those who took the time to wade upstream through the torrent of digital rumors to chase down leads and verify facts and painstakingly put the pieces together to inform, and to educate, and to tell stories that demanded to be told.

If anyone wonders, for example, whether newspapers are a thing of the past, all you needed to do was to pick up or log on to papers like the Boston Globe. (Applause.) When their communities and the wider world needed them most, they were there making sense of events that might at first blush seem beyond our comprehension. And that’s what great journalism is, and that’s what great journalists do. And that’s why, for example, Pete Williams' new nickname around the NBC newsroom is "Big Papi." (Applause.)

And in these past few weeks, as I've gotten a chance to meet many of the first responders and the police officers and volunteers who raced to help when hardship hits, I was reminded, as I'm always reminded when I meet our men and women in uniform, whether they're in war theater, or here back home, or at Walter Reed in Bethesda -- I'm reminded that all these folks, they don’t do it to be honored, they don’t do it to be celebrated. They do it because they love their families and they love their neighborhoods and they love their country.

And so, these men and women should inspire all of us in this room to live up to those same standards; to be worthy of their trust; to do our jobs with the same fidelity, and the same integrity, and the same sense of purpose, and the same love of country. Because if we're only focused on profits or ratings or polls, then we're contributing to the cynicism that so many people feel right now. (Applause.)

And so, those of us in this room tonight, we are incredibly lucky. And the fact is, we can do better -- all of us. Those of us in public office, those of us in the press, those who produce entertainment for our kids, those with power, those with influence -- all of us, including myself, we can strive to value those things that I suspect led most of us to do the work that we do in the first place -- because we believed in something that was true, and we believed in service, and the idea that we can have a lasting, positive impact on the lives of the people around us.

And that’s our obligation. That’s a task we should gladly embrace on behalf of all of those folks who are counting on us; on behalf of this country that’s given us so much.

So thank you all, to the White House Correspondents for the great work you do. God bless you all. May God bless the United States of America.

END        10:36 P.M. EDT