The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a DNC Event

Private Residence, San Francisco, California

7:30 P.M. PDT

      THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you, everybody.  Thank you.  Please -- thank you so much.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Everybody sit down.  Have a seat.

      I know all of you wish that Stevie would just keep on playing.  (Laughter.)  I understand that, and I can relate to it.  I was mentioning to Marc -- and I hate to do this to you, Stevie, because I’m dating you a little bit -- but the first album that I ever bought with my own little spending money was “Talking Book.”  I was 10 years old.  (Applause.)  I was 10 years old, and I would sit in my room and I had this old phonograph, and the earphones were like really big.  You didn’t have the little iPod buds.  They covered your whole ear.  And I would sit in my room and pretend I was Stevie Wonder.  (Laughter.)  And unfortunately, my grandparents, who were -- I was living with at the time, they had to suffer hearing me sing.  I couldn’t hear myself sing.  I was just hearing Stevie, and I figured I sounded just like him.  (Laughter.)  But I’m sure that was not the case.

      Anyway, Stevie and will.i.am have both been huge supporters, huge friends from very early on in this campaign process.  And so it’s wonderful to have them here.  But I want to most of all thank Marc and Lynne -- and Leia -- for sharing their homes.  This is an incredible setting, but what makes it special is the fact that I’ve got a lot of friends in this room.

      As Marc indicated, people who are leaders, not just in this community but nationally and internationally, but so many of you helped get this project started.  Some of you are involved in startups.  Well, I was a startup just -- not so long ago.  And when I think about that campaign in 2008, the fact is, so many of you took a chance on me.  It was not at all likely that I was going to win.  A lot of people couldn’t pronounce my name, much less expect that I would end up being in the Oval Office.

      But a lot of you put faith in that campaign, primarily because the campaign wasn’t about me.  What the campaign was about was a particular vision of America, an idea about who we are as a people.  It was a notion that for all our differences, for all the shifts that have taken place in this country, for all our sometimes troubled history, despite -- no, because of our diversity of race and faith and region, that there was something special when we come together, and that we can somehow combine a fierce individualism and a sense of entrepreneurship and risk-taking and self-reliance and responsibility with also a sense of community, a sense of mutual obligation, a sense that our lives are better if we’re looking out for one another.

      And that spirit was captured in the campaign, and I was sort of a repository for a lot of hopes and expectations that we could get past so many of the divisions and start working together because we were facing some fundamental challenges in this country that we hadn’t seen in a very long time.

      Now, as Marc mentioned, I think none of us realized how profound some of the crises that we were going to confront would be.  When I started running, and even up until maybe a couple months before the campaign, we didn’t realize we faced the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.  We didn’t realize that we had already lost 4 million jobs by the time I was sworn in and would lose another 4 million probably in the first three, four, six months of my presidency.

      We didn’t understand the degree to which the financial system might melt down and its global consequences.  And yet, despite the enormous economic challenges we faced, despite the changes that we’re seeing internationally, we have made extraordinary progress -- not just pulling the economy back from the brink, but also pushing through that vision that we had, making an America that was more competitive, that was more inclusive, an America that was tapping into that entrepreneurial spirit and once again regaining our edge in this 21st-century global economy, and ended up delivering on promises and commitments that we had made to each other that we knew were going to be very hard, but we knew were going to be important for our future.

      So not only did we make the biggest investment in education that the federal government has ever made, not only did we make the biggest investment in clean energy in our history, not only did we make the biggest investment in infrastructure since Dwight Eisenhower built the Interstate Highway System, not only did we put the most money in basic research in our history, but we passed a health care bill that finally began to deliver on the promise of universal health care, something we’d been trying to do for a hundred years.

      We got “don’t ask, don’t tell” repealed so that anybody who loves this country can serve this country.  We got two women on the Supreme Court including the first Latino woman -- the first Latina on the Supreme Court.  (Applause.)

      On issue after issue we’ve made progress.  Now, here’s the challenge -- and then I’m going to shut up because I want to -- well, I won’t shut up, I want to take some questions from folks.  For all the good work that we’ve done, we’re not finished.  We’ve got more work to do.

      And I think most of the people here understand that we still have some fundamental choices to make in this country if we’re going to deliver the kind of America to our children and our grandchildren that we dreamed about and thought about in 2008.

      The economy is still not as strong as it needs to be, and we’ve still got millions of people all around the country who are out of work, at risk of losing their home, can’t pay their bills.  And we’ve got to deliver for them.

      There are still too many children out there who are in substandard schools, can’t imagine working for one of the companies that are represented here today, don’t even know these companies exist, can’t imagine a career that was stable and steady and that would allow them to raise a family, so we’re going to have to deliver on education reform here and all across the country, and make sure that those kids can go to college and get career-ready.

      We’re not finished when it comes to energy.  Right now we’ve got $4-a-gallon gas, and most of the people under this tent don’t have to worry about that.  But for the average person who has to drive 50 miles to work and can’t afford to buy the Tesla -- (laughter) -- it’s hammering them.  It’s hurting them.  So there’s a huge economic imperative.  There’s a national security imperative, as well, because we see what’s happening in the Middle East and we understand that a finite resource that is primarily located in a very unstable part of the world is not good for our long-term future.

      And then there’s the environmental aspect of it.  There are climate change deniers in Congress and when the economy gets tough, sometimes environmental issues drop from people’s radar screens.  But I don’t think there’s any doubt that unless we are able to move forward in a serious way on clean energy that we’re putting our children and our grandchildren at risk.

      So that’s not yet done.  And then we’ve got this big budget debate that we’re having, which really is probably the most fundamental example of the choice that we’re going to be facing over the next 10, 15, 20 years.  And I won’t repeat some of the speeches that I’ve given recently because I suspect some of you have heard them.  But let me just be very clear:  The deficit is real.  Our debt is real.  We’ve got to do something about it.  But how we do it is going to make a huge difference in terms of whether we can win the future.

      And we’ve got a very stark choice.  You’ve got a Republican vision right now in Congress that says we are going to slash clean energy funding by 70 percent, education funding by 25 percent, transportation funding by a third; we’re going to cut taxes further for the well-to-do; and we’re going to make up the entire deficit not only by cutting programs for things like Head Start, but we’re also going to fundamentally change our social compact so that Medicare is no longer something that our seniors can count on.

      The alternative vision, the one that I presented, says we can manage this debt and this deficit in a serious way by eliminating spending we don’t need, saving $2 trillion making some tough choices, but also raising a trillion dollars’ worth of revenue primarily from folks like us who have benefited incredibly from this society and everything that it offers, that will save us a trillion dollars on interest, and that we can change our health care system so instead of just shifting those costs on to people who aren’t in a position to bear those costs, actually making the health care system more efficient, making it work -- using things like health IT and managing of chronic care, and making sure that our providers are reimbursed in smarter ways, to bend the cost curve on health care so that it’s sustainable for the next generation.

      That’s a fundamental choice, a fundamental distinction in terms of how we view the future.

      And so I’ll just close these opening remarks by saying that I am a congenital optimist when it comes to this country, and I do not accept a vision that says America gets small, where suddenly we can’t build a world-class smart grid, or we can’t build the best ports and airports, or we don’t have the best scientific research, or our kids can no longer access the best universities unless they’re wealthy, or we can’t afford to look after people who are the most vulnerable in our society, or we can’t provide a guarantee to our seniors that they’re going to be cared for after a lifetime of hard work.

      That’s the easy path, in some ways.  I mean, the easiest thing to do is for the rich and the powerful to say, we’ve got ours and we don’t have to worry about the rest.  Doesn’t require a lot of imagination.  The easiest way to cut health care is just stop giving health care to people.

      But that’s not the America I believe in.  That’s not the America you believe in.  And that’s what 2012 is going to be about.  We started something in 2008; we haven’t finished it yet.  And I’m going to need you to help me finish it.

                            END            7:45 P.M. PDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a Facebook Town Hall

Facebook Headquarters
Palo Alto, California

1:58 P.M. PDT

      THE PRESIDENT:  Well, thank you so much, Facebook, for hosting this, first of all.  (Applause.)  My name is Barack Obama, and I'm the guy who got Mark to wear a jacket and tie.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  (Laughter.)  I'm very proud of that.  (Laughter.)

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  Second time.

      THE PRESIDENT:  I know.  (Laughter.)  I will say -- and I hate to tell stories on Mark, but the first time we had dinner together and he wore this jacket and tie, I'd say halfway through dinner he’s starting to sweat a little bit.  It’s really uncomfortable for him.  So I helped him out of his jacket.  (Laughter.)  And in fact, if you’d like, Mark, we can take our jackets off.  (Applause.)

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  That's good.

      THE PRESIDENT:  Woo, that's better, isn’t it?

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  Yes, but you're a lot better at this stuff than me.  (Laughter.)

      THE PRESIDENT:  So, first of all, I just want to say thank you to all of you for taking the time -- not only people who are here in the audience, but also folks all over the country and some around the world who are watching this town hall.

      The main reason we wanted to do this is, first of all, because more and more people, especially young people, are getting their information through different media.  And obviously what all of you have built together is helping to revolutionize how people get information, how they process information, how they’re connecting with each other.

      And historically, part of what makes for a healthy democracy, what is good politics, is when you’ve got citizens who are informed, who are engaged.  And what Facebook allows us to do is make sure this isn’t just a one-way conversation; makes sure that not only am I speaking to you but you're also speaking back and we're in a conversation, were in a dialogue.  So I love doing town hall meetings.  This format and this company I think is an ideal means for us to be able to carry on this conversation.

      And as Mark mentioned, obviously we're having a very serious debate right now about the future direction of our country.  We are living through as tumultuous a time as certainly I've seen in my lifetime.  Admittedly, my lifetime is a lot longer than most of yours so far.  This is a pretty young crowd.  But we're seeing, domestically, a whole series of challenges, starting with the worst recession we've had since the Great Depression.  We're just now coming out of it.  We've got all sorts of disruptions, technological disruptions that are taking place, most of which hold the promise of making our lives a lot better, but also mean that there are a lot of adjustments that people are having to make throughout the economy.

      We still have a very high unemployment rate that is starting to come down, but there are an awful lot of people who are being challenged out there, day in, day out, worrying about whether they can pay the bills, whether they can keep their home.

      Internationally, we're seeing the sorts of changes that we haven't seen in a generation.  We've got certain challenges like energy and climate change that no one nation can solve but we're going to have to solve together.  And we don't yet have all the institutions that are in place in order to do that.

      But what makes me incredibly optimistic -- and that's why being here at Facebook is so exciting for me -- is that at every juncture in our history, whenever we face challenges like this, whether it’s been the shift from a agricultural age to a industrial age, or whether it was facing the challenges of the Cold War, or trying to figure out how we make this country more fair and more inclusive, at every juncture we’ve always been able to adapt.  We’ve been able to change and we’ve been able to get ahead of the curve.  And that’s true today as well, and you guys are at the cutting edge of what’s happening.

      And so I’m going to be interested in talking to all of you about why this debate that we’re having around debt and our deficits is so important, because it’s going to help determine whether we can invest in our future and basic research and innovation and infrastructure that will allow us to compete in the 21st century and still preserve a safety net for the most vulnerable among us.

      But I’m also going to want to share ideas with you about how we can make our democracy work better and our politics work better -- because I don’t think there’s a problem out there that we can’t solve if we decide that we’re going to solve it together.

      And for that, I’m grateful for the opportunity to speak to you.  And instead of just giving a lot of long speeches I want to make sure that we’ve got time for as many questions as possible.

      So, Mark, I understand you got the first one.

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  Yes, let’s start off.  So let’s start off with the conversation about the debt.  So I understand that yesterday morning you had a town hall in Virginia where you talked about your framework not only for resolving the short-term budget issues, but the longer-term debt.  And you spent some time talking about tax reform and some cost cutting, but you also spent a lot of time talking about things that you didn’t think that we could cut -- in education, infrastructure and clean energy.

      So my question to kind of start off is:  What specifically do you think we should do, and what specifically do you think we can cut in order to make this all add up?

      THE PRESIDENT:  Well, let me, first of all, Mark, share with you sort of the nature of the problem, because I think a lot of folks understand that it’s a problem but aren’t sure how it came about.

      In 2000, at the end of the Clinton administration, we not only had a balanced budget but we actually had a surplus.  And that was in part because of some tough decisions that had been made by President Clinton, Republican Congresses, Democratic Congresses, and President George H.W. Bush.  And what they had said was let’s make sure that we’re spending wisely on the things that matter; let’s spend less on things that don’t matter; and let’s make sure that we’re living within our means, that we’re taking in enough revenue to pay for some of these basic obligations.

      What happened then was we went through 10 years where we forgot what had created the surplus in the first place.  So we had a massive tax cut that wasn’t offset by cuts in spending.  We had two wars that weren’t paid for.  And this was the first time in history where we had gone to war and not asked for additional sacrifice from American citizens.  We had a huge prescription drug plan that wasn’t paid for.

      And so by the time I started office we already had about a trillion-dollar annual deficit and we had massive accumulated debt with interest payments to boot.  Then you have this huge recession.  And so what happens is less revenue is coming in -- because company sales are lower, individuals are making less money -- at the same time there’s more need out there.  So we’re having to help states and we’re having to help local governments.
      And that -- a lot of what the recovery was about was us making sure that the economy didn’t tilt over into a depression by making sure that teachers weren’t laid off and firefighters weren’t laid off, and there was still construction for roads and so forth -- all of which was expensive.  I mean, that added about another trillion dollars worth of debt.

      So now what we’ve got is a situation not only do we have this accumulated debt, but the baby boomers are just now starting to retire.  And what’s scary is not only that the baby boomers are retiring at a greater rate, which means they're making greater demands on Social Security, but primarily Medicare and Medicaid, but health care costs go up a lot faster than inflation and older populations use more health care costs.  You put that all together, and we have an unsustainable situation.

      So right now we face a critical time where we’re going to have to make some decisions how do we bring down the debt in the short term, and how do we bring down the debt over the long term.

      In the short term, Democrats and Republicans now agree we’ve got to reduce the debt by about $4 trillion over the next 10 years.  And I know that sounds like a lot of money -- it is.  But it’s doable if we do it in a balanced way.

      What I proposed was that about $2 trillion over 10 to 12 years is reduction in spending.  Government wastes, just like every other major institution does, and so there are things that we do that we can afford not to do.  Now, there are some things that I’d like to do, are fun to do, but we just can’t afford them right now.

      So we’ve made cuts in every area.  A good example is Pentagon spending, where Congress oftentimes stuffs weapons systems in the Pentagon budget that the Pentagon itself says we don’t need.  But special interests and constituencies helped to bloat the Pentagon budget.  So we’ve already reduced the Pentagon budget by about $400 billion.  We think we can do about another $400 billion.

      So we’ve got to look at spending both on non-security issues as well as defense spending.  And then what we’ve said is let’s take another trillion of that that we raise through a reform in the tax system that allows people like me -- and, frankly, you, Mark -- for paying a little more in taxes.  (Laughter.)

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  I’m cool with that.

      THE PRESIDENT:  I know you’re okay with that.  (Laughter.)  Keep in mind, what we’re talking about is going back to the rates that existed when Bill Clinton was President.  Now, a lot of you were -- (laughter) -- I’m trying to say this delicately -- still in diapers at that time.  (Laughter.)  But for those of you who recall, the economy was booming, and wealthy people were getting wealthier.  There wasn’t a problem at that time.  If we go back to those rates alone, that by itself would do a lot in terms of us reducing our overall spending.  And if we can get a trillion dollars on the revenue side, $2 trillion in cutting spending, we can still make investments in basic research.

      We can still invest in something we call ARPA-E, which is like DARPA except just focused on energy, so that we can figure out what are the next breakthrough technologies that can help us reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.

      We can still make investments in education, so we’ve already expanded the Pell Grant program so that more young people can go to college.  We’re investing more in STEM education -- math and science and technology education.  We can still make those investments.  We can still rebuild our roads and our bridges, and invest in high-speed rail, and invest in the next generation of broadband and wireless, and make sure everybody has access to the Internet.  We can do all those things while still bringing down the deficit medium term.

      Now, there’s one last component of this -- and I know this is a long answer but I wanted to make sure everybody had the basic foundations for it.  Even if we get this $4 trillion, we do still have a long-term problem with Medicare and Medicaid, because health care costs, the inflation goes up so much faster than wages and salaries.  And this is where there’s another big philosophical debate with the Republicans, because what I’ve said is the best way for us to change it is to build on the health reform we had last year and start getting a better bang for our health care dollar.

      We waste so much on health care.  We spend about 20 percent more than any other country on Earth, and we have worse outcomes because we end up having multiple tests when we could just do one test and have it shared among physicians on Facebook, for example.

      We could focus on the chronically ill; 20 percent of the patients account for 80 percent of the costs.  So doing something simple like reimbursing hospitals and doctors for reducing their readmissions rate, and managing somebody with a chronic illness like diabetes so that they're taking their meds on a regular basis so that they don't come to the emergency room, that saves huge amounts of money.

      So that's what health care reform was about last year or a year and a half ago, and what we want to do is build on that and continue to improve the system.

      What the Republicans right now are saying is, number one, they can't agree to any increases in taxes, which means we’d have to cut out -- of that $4 trillion, all of it would come from education, transportation -- areas that I think are critical for our long-term future.

      So, for example, they proposed 70 percent cuts in clean energy.  Well, I don't know how we free ourselves from dependence on foreign oil -- and anybody who is paying gas prices knows that there’s an economic component to this as well as an environmental component to it -- if we’re not investing in the basic research and technology that allows solar, wind and others to thrive and develop.

      At the same time, what they’ve said is let’s make Medicare into a voucher program, so that retirees, instead of knowing that they're always going to have health care, they're going to get a voucher that covers part of the cost, and whatever health care inflation comes up is all going to be on them.  And if the health insurance companies don't sell you a policy that covers your illnesses, you’re out of luck.

      I think it is very important for us to have a basic social safety net for families with kids with disabilities, for seniors, for folks who are in nursing homes, and I think it’s important for us to invest in our basic research.  We can do all those things, but we’re only going to be able to do it by taking a balanced approach.  And that's what this big debate is about -- all about right now.  All right?

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  All right, so -- sorry, don't mean to cut off the applause.  (Applause.)

      THE PRESIDENT:  No, no, no, no, no.

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  That was a very thorough answer.

      THE PRESIDENT:  No, they were -- they were stunned by the length of that answer.  (Laughter.)  But it’s complicated stuff.

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  So the next question is from someone watching Facebook live.  Jay Aptine (ph) from Williamsburg, Virginia writes in and asks:  “The housing crisis will not go away.  The mortgage financing for new homebuyers with low to moderate income is becoming very difficult.  As President, what can you do to relax the policies that are disqualifying qualified homebuyers from owning their first home?  How can you assure the low to moderate homebuyers that they will have the opportunity to own their first home?”

      THE PRESIDENT:  Well, it’s a good question.  And I’ll be honest with you, this is probably the biggest drag on the economy right now that we have -- along with I know the frustrations people have about gas prices.  What we’ve really seen is the housing market, which was a bubble, had greatly over-inflated in all regions of the country.  And I know I probably don't get a lot of sympathy about that here because I can only imagine what rents and mortgages you guys are paying.

      It is a real drag in all sorts of ways.  People, first of all, they feel poorer even if they still have a home or they’ve already purchased a home, because for a lot of folks their mortgage is now what’s called underwater.  The mortgage is more than the home is worth.  And so if you feel like your most important asset is now worth less than your debt, that's going to constrain how you spend.  People who want to move have a great deal of trouble selling, and people who want to buy, as you pointed out, are seeing terms a lot more restrictive.

      So we've put in place a bunch of programs to try to see if we can speed along the process of reaching a new equilibrium.  For example, what we did is we went to the mortgage lender and said, why don't you renegotiate with your mortgage -- with the person with the mortgage, renegotiate the terms of their mortgage so that their principal is a little bit lower, they can afford the payments, and that way homes don't get foreclosed on, there are fewer homes on the market, and that will raise prices and that will be good for everybody.  And we've seen some significant progress on that front.

      The challenge we still have, as your questioner properly points out, is that a lot of people who bought a first home when credit was easy now are finding that credit is tough.  And we've got to strike a balance.  Frankly, there’s some folks who are probably better off renting.  And what we don't want to do is return to a situation where people are putting no money down and they’ve got very easy payment terms at the front end and then it turns out five years from now, because they’ve got an adjustable rate mortgage, that they couldn't afford it and they lose their home.

      I think the regulators are trying to get that balance right. There are certain communities with high foreclosure rates where what we're trying to do is see if can we help state and local governments take over some of these homes and convert them and provide favorable terms to first-time home buyers.  But, frankly, I think we've got to understand that the days where it was really easy to buy a house without any money down is probably over.  And what we -- what I'm really concerned about is making sure that the housing market overall recovers enough that it’s not such a huge drag on the economy, because if it isn’t, then people will have more confidence, they’ll spend more, more people will get hired, and overall the economy will improve.

      But I recognize for a lot of folks who want to be first-time homebuyers it’s still tough out there.  It’s getting better in certain areas, but in some places, particularly where there was a big housing bubble, it’s not.

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  So I think the next question is from a Facebook employee in the room today.  So Lauren Hale has a question.  Lauren, where are you from?

      Q    Hi -- over here.

      THE PRESIDENT:  Hey, Lauren.

      Q    Hi, Mr. President.  Thank you so much for joining us today.  I am originally from Detroit, Michigan, and now I'm out here working at Facebook.  So my question for you kind of builds on some of the things we were just talking about.  At the beginning of your term you spent a lot of time talking about job creation and the road to economic recovery, and one of the ways to do that would be substantially increasing federal investments in various areas as a way to fill the void left from consumer spending.  Since then, we’ve seen the conversation shift from that of job creation and economic recovery to that of spending cuts and the deficit.  So I would love to know your thoughts on how you’re going to balance these two going forward, or even potentially shift the conversation back.

      THE PRESIDENT:  Well, you’re exactly right that when I first came into office our number-one job was preventing us from getting into another Great Depression.  And that was what the Recovery Act was all about.  So we helped states make sure that they could minimize some of the layoffs and some of the difficult budget choices that they faced.  We made sure that we had infrastructure spending all around the country.  And, in fact, we made the biggest investment in infrastructure since Dwight Eisenhower built the Interstate Highway System.

      We made the largest investment in history in clean energy research, and it’s really paying off.  For example, when I came into office, we had about 2 percent of the advanced battery manufacturing here in America.  And as everybody here knows, what’s really holding us back from my goal of a million electric vehicles on the road is that battery technology is still tough.  It’s clunky; it’s heavy; it’s expensive.  And if we can make significant improvements in battery technology then I think the opportunities for electric vehicles, alternative vehicles that are much cheaper -- our opportunities are limitless.

      So those were all investments that we made in the first two years.  Now, the economy is now growing.  It’s not growing quite as fast as we would like, because after a financial crisis, typically there’s a bigger drag on the economy for a longer period of time.  But it is growing.  And over the last year and a half we’ve seen almost 2 million jobs created in the private sector.

      Because this recession came at a time when we were already deeply in debt and it made the debt worse, if we don’t have a serious plan to tackle the debt and the deficit, that could actually end up being a bigger drag on the economy than anything else.  If the markets start feeling that we’re not serious about the problem, and if you start seeing investors feel uncertain about the future, then they could pull back right at the time when the economy is taking off.

      So you’re right that it’s tricky.  Folks around here are used to the hills in San Francisco, and you’ve driven -- I don’t know if they still have clutch cars around here.  Anybody every driven a clutch car?  (Laughter.)  I mean, you got to sort of tap and -- well, that’s sort of what we faced in terms of the economy, right?  We got to hit the accelerator, but we’ve got to also make sure that we don’t gun it; we can’t let the car slip backwards.  And so what we’re trying to do then is put together a debt and deficit plan that doesn’t slash spending so drastically that we can’t still make investments in education, that we can’t still make investments in infrastructure -- all of which would help the economy grow.

      In December, we passed a targeted tax cut for business investment, as well as the payroll tax that has a stimulus effect that helps to grow the economy.  We can do those things and still grow the economy while having a plan in place to reduce the deficit, first by 2015, and then over the long term.  So I think we can do both, but it does require the balanced approach that I was talking about.

      If all we’re doing is spending cuts and we’re not discriminating about it, if we’re using a machete instead of a scalpel and we’re cutting out things that create jobs, then the deficit could actually get worse because we could slip back into another recession.

      And obviously for folks in Detroit, where you’re from, they know that our investments can make a difference because we essentially saved the U.S. auto industry.  We now have three auto companies here in America that are all turning a profit.  G.M. just announced that it’s hiring back all of the workers that it was planning to lay off.  And we did so, by the way, at the same time as we were able to increase fuel efficiency standards on cars for the first time in 30 years.  So it can be done, but it takes a balanced approach.  (Applause.)

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  All right, so we have a question from the University of Florida, where in February, you launched this initiative at Whitehouse.gov, younger Americans with this goal to have a hundred youth roundtables across the country and a bunch of them are taking place right now, watching this Facebook live.

      So Cesar Fernandez (ph) and Elisa Rectanas (ph) are participating in one of those roundtables, and they wanted to ask you this:  “Mr. President, in your deficit reduction speech last week you spoke of the need to not only reduce government spending but to also increase federal revenue.  In light of our nation’s budget challenges, will your administration consider revisiting policies such as the DREAM Act, which the Congressional Budget Office estimates will reduce the deficit by $1.4 billion and increase the government revenue by $2.3 billion over the next 10 years?”  (Applause.)

      THE PRESIDENT:  Let me talk about not only the DREAM Act but about immigration policy generally.  And I want to thank -- Sheryl Sandberg actually participated in a discussion that we had yesterday, bringing together business leaders and government officials and faith leaders, a broad cross-section of Americans together to talk about how do we finally fix an immigration system that's fundamentally broken.

      For those of you who aren’t familiar, the DREAM Act is -- deals with a particular portion of the population, kids who were brought here when they were young by their parents; their parents might have come here illegally -- the kids didn't do anything.  They were just doing what kids do, which is follow their parents. They’ve grown up as Americans.  They went to school with us or with our kids.  They think of themselves as Americans, but many of them still don't have a legal status.

      And so what we’ve said is, especially for these young people who are our neighbors, our friends, our children’s friends, if they are of good character and going to school or joining our military, they want to be part of the American family, why wouldn’t we want to embrace them?  Why wouldn’t we want to make sure that -- (applause.)  Why wouldn’t we want to make sure that they're contributing to our future?

      So that's the DREAM Act.  But that's just a small part of a broader challenge that we have.  Immigration in this country has always been complicated.  The truth of the matter is that we are both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws.  Sometimes the laws haven’t been fair.  Sometimes the laws have been restrictive to certain ethnic groups.  There have been quotas.  Sometimes our immigration policies have been arbitrary and have been determined by whether industry at a particular time was willing to bring in workers on the cheap.

      But what’s undeniable is America is a nation of immigrants. That’s our history and that’s what makes us stronger.  Because we’ve got ambitious people from all around the world who come here because they’ve got a new idea and they want to create the new big thing, or they just want a better future for their kids and their family, and that dynamism is part of what’s propelled our progress and kept us young.

      Now, I think most Americans understand that and most Americans agree with that.  At the same time, I think most Americans feel there should be an orderly process to do it.  People shouldn’t just be coming here and cutting in front of the line, essentially, and staying without having gone through the proper channels.

      So what we’ve said is let’s fix the whole system.  First of all, let’s make the legal immigration system more fair than it is and more efficient than it is.  And that includes, by the way, something I know that is of great concern here in Silicon Valley. If we’ve got smart people who want to come here and start businesses and are PhDs in math and science and computer science, why don’t we want them to say?  (Applause.)  I mean, why would we want to send them someplace else?  (Applause.)

      So those are potential job creators.  Those are job generators.  I think about somebody like an Andy Grove of Intel. We want more Andy Groves here in the United States.  We don’t want them starting companies -- we don’t want them starting Intel in China or starting it in France.  We want them starting it here.

      So there’s a lot that we can do for making sure that high-skilled immigrants who come here, study -- we’ve paid for their college degrees, we’ve given them scholarships, we’ve given them this training -- let’s make sure that if they want to reinvest and make their future here in America that they can.  So that’s point number one.

      But point number two is you also have a lot of unskilled workers who are now here who are living in the shadows.  They’re contributing to our economy in all sorts of ways.  They’re working in the agricultural sector.  They are in restaurants, and they’re in communities all across the country looking after children and helping to building America.  But they’re scared, and they feel as if they’re locked out of their surroundings.

      And what I’ve said is they did break the law; they came here -- they have to take responsibility for that.  They should pay a fine.  They should learn English.  They should go to the back of the line so that they don’t automatically get citizenship.  But there should be a pathway for them to get legalized in our society so they don’t fear for themselves or their families, so that families aren’t separated.

      At the same time, let’s make sure we’ve got a secure border so that folks aren’t wandering through the desert to get here.  Let’s make the legal immigration system more efficient and more effective so there aren’t huge backlogs.

      This is all part of what we call comprehensive immigration reform.  And there’s no reason why we shouldn’t be able to achieve a system that is fair, is equitable, is an economic engine for America that helps the people who are already here get acculturated, and make sure that our laws aren’t being broken but we’re still true to our traditions.

      But, as I mentioned to Sheryl yesterday, I can’t solve this problem by myself.  Nancy Pelosi is a big champion of this.  The Democratic caucus in the House I think is prepared for -- a majority of them are prepared to advance comprehensive immigration reform.  But we’re going to have to have bipartisan support in order to make it happen.  And all of you have to make sure your voices are heard, saying this is a priority, this is something important -- because if politicians don’t hear from you, then it probably won’t happen.  I can’t do it by myself.  We’re going to have to change the laws in Congress, but I’m confident we can make it happen.  (Applause.)

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  All right.  So the next one is from a Facebook employee, Leo Abraham.  Leo, where are you from?

      THE PRESIDENT:  Hey, Leo.

      Q    Hi, hey.  I’m from -- originally from San Jose, California.  My question is:  The 2012 budget plan proposed by Paul Ryan has been praised by many in the media as bold or brave. Do you see this as a time that calls for boldness, and do you think that the plan you outlined last week demonstrated sufficient boldness, or is this just a media creation?

      THE PRESIDENT:  No, it’s a great question.  Look, here is what I’d say.  The Republican budget that was put forward I would say is fairly radical.  I wouldn’t call it particularly courageous.  I do think Mr. Ryan is sincere.  I think he’s a patriot.  I think he wants to solve a real problem, which is our long-term deficit.  But I think that what he and the other Republicans in the House of Representatives also want to do is change our social compact in a pretty fundamental way.

      Their basic view is that no matter how successful I am, no matter how much I’ve taken from this country -- I wasn’t born wealthy; I was raised by a single mom and my grandparents.  I went to college on scholarships.  There was a time when my mom was trying to get her PhD, where for a short time she had to take food stamps.  My grandparents relied on Medicare and Social Security to help supplement their income when they got old.

      So their notion is, despite the fact that I’ve benefited from all these investments -- my grandfather benefited from the GI Bill after he fought in World War II -- that somehow I now have no obligation to people who are less fortunate than me and I have no real obligation to future generations to make investments so that they have a better.

      So what his budget proposal does is not only hold income tax flat, he actually wants to further reduce taxes for the wealthy, further reduce taxes for corporations, not pay for those, and in order to make his numbers work, cut 70 percent out of our clean energy budget, cut 25 percent out of our education budget, cut transportation budgets by a third.  I guess you could call that bold.  I would call it shortsighted.  (Applause.)

      And then, as I said, there’s a fundamental difference between how the Republicans and I think about Medicare and Medicaid and our health care system.  Their basic theory is that if we just turn Medicare into a voucher program and turn Medicaid into block grant programs, then now you, a Medicare recipient, will go out and you’ll shop for the best insurance that you’ve got -- that you can find -- and that you’re going to control costs because you’re going to say to the insurance company, this is all I can afford.

      That will control costs, except if you get sick and the policy that you bought doesn’t cover what you’ve got.  Then either you’re going to mortgage your house or you’re going to go to the emergency room, in which case I, who do have insurance, are going to have to pay for it indirectly because the hospital is going to have uncompensated care.

      So they don’t really want to make the health care system more efficient and cheaper.  What they want to do is to push the costs of health care inflation on to you.  And then you’ll be on your own trying to figure out in the marketplace how to make health care cheaper.

      The problem is, you’re just one person.  Now, you work at Facebook, it’s a big enough company; Facebook can probably negotiate with insurance companies and providers to get you a pretty good deal.  But if you’re a startup company, if you’re an entrepreneur out there in the back of your garage, good luck trying to get insurance on your own.  You can’t do it.  If you’re somebody who’s older and has a preexisting condition, insurance companies won’t take you.

      So what we’ve said is let’s make sure instead of just pushing the costs off on to people who individually are not going to have any negotiating power or ability to change how providers operate, or how hospitals or doctors operate, how insurance companies operate, let’s make sure that we have a system both for Medicare but also for people who currently don’t have health insurance where they can be part of a big pool.  They can negotiate for changes in how the health care system works so that it’s more efficient; so that it’s more effective; so that you get better care, so that we have fewer infection rates, for example, in hospitals; so there are fewer readmission rates; so that we’re caring for the chronically ill more effectively; so that there are fewer unnecessary tests.  That’s how you save money.  The government will save money, but you’ll also save money.

      So we think that’s a better way of doing it.  Now, what they’ll say is, well, you know what, that will never work because it’s government imposed and it’s bureaucracy and it’s government takeover and there are death panels.  I still don’t entirely understand the whole “death panel” concept.  But I guess what they’re saying is somehow some remote bureaucrat will be deciding your health care for you.  All we’re saying is if we’ve got health care experts -- doctors and nurses and consumers -- who are helping to design how Medicare works more intelligently, then we don't have to radically change Medicare.

      So, yes, I think it’s fair to say that their vision is radical.  No, I don't think it’s particularly courageous.  Because the last point I’ll make is this.  Nothing is easier than solving a problem on the backs of people who are poor or people who are powerless or don't have lobbyists or don't have clout.  I don't think that's particularly courageous.  (Applause.)

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  All right, the next one is from the web.  We’ve got a question from Kwami Simmons (ph) from Orlando, Florida.  And he asks:  “I strongly believe that education is the greatest equalizer.  With so many problems plaguing our current system, is it possible to examine a complete overhaul of the system so that it addresses the needs of modern students?”

      And before you jump in, I just want to say as someone who has spent a bunch of time researching education and who cares about this, I think the Race to the Top stuff that you guys have done is one of the most under-appreciated and most important things that your administration has done.  (Applause.)  

      THE PRESIDENT:  I appreciate that.  This is an area where actually I think you’ve seen the parties actually come together. And there’s some good bipartisan work being done.

      It used to be that the argument around education always revolved around the left saying we just need more money, and the right saying we should just blow up the system because public schools aren’t doing a good job.  And what you’re now seeing is people recognizing we need both money and reform.  It’s not an either-or proposition; it’s a both-and proposition.

      So what Mark just mentioned, something called Race to the Top, pretty simple concept.  Most federal dollars are allocated through a formula.  If you’ve got a certain number of poor kids or you’ve got a certain number of disabled kids in your school district, there’s a formula, and you get a certain amount of money.  And every state and every school district gets that money according to the formula.

      What we did was we took about 1 percent of the total spending on education and we said, to get this 1 percent, show us that you’re reforming the system.  It’s almost -- it’s like a competition model.  And so every state, every school district could apply.  And you had to show us that you had a good plan to retrain teachers and recruit and do good professional development so we’ve got the best teacher possible.

      You had to have accountability.  You had to show us that you were actually making progress in the schools, and that you were measuring through data the improvements that were being made; that you were reaching into the schools that were hardest to reach -- because there are about 2,000 schools around the country that account for the majority of dropouts in our country.  They're like dropout factories -- so show us a plan to go into those schools and really make a big difference.

      And what’s happened is that over 40 states, in the process of competing for this extra money, ended up initiating probably the most meaningful reforms that we’ve seen in a generation.  And so it’s made a huge difference.  Even those states that didn't end up actually winning the competition still made changes that are improving the potential for good outcomes in the schools.

      So that's the kind of creative approach that you’ve seen some Democrats and some Republicans embrace.  And our hope is we can build on that.

      A couple of things that we know work:  The most important thing to a good education is making sure we’ve got a good teacher in front of that classroom.  And so providing more support for teachers, recruiting the best and brightest into teaching, making sure that they're compensated, but also making sure that they're performing, that's hugely important.

      The other thing is good data so that there’s a constant feedback, not just a bunch of standardized tests that go into a drawer or that people may game in order not to get penalized.  That's what happened under No Child Left Behind.  But instead, real good data that you can present to the teacher while they're still teaching that child and say, you know what, this child is falling behind in math; here are some ways to do it, to improve their performance.

      So we’re starting to see real progress on the ground, and I’m optimistic that we can actually, before the 2012 election, potentially have a federal education law that will embody some of the best information that we have about how to initiate good school reform.

      Now, last point I’ll make on this:  Government alone can’t do it.  One of the things every time I come to Silicon Valley that I’m inspired by but I’m also frustrated by is how many smart people are here, but also frustrated that I always hear stories about how we can’t find enough engineers, we can’t find enough computer programmers.  You know what, that means our education system is not working the way it should, and that's got to start early.

      And that's why we’re emphasizing math and science.  That's why we’re emphasizing teaching girls math and science.  (Applause.)  That's why we’re emphasizing making sure that black and Hispanic kids are getting math and science.  (Applause.)

      We’ve got to do such a better job when it comes to STEM education.  AAnd that’s one of the reasons, by the way, that we had our first science fair at the White House in a very long time, just because we want to start making science cool.  (Applause.)  I want people to feel the same way about the next big energy breakthrough or the next big Internet breakthrough, I want people to feel the same way they felt about the moon launch -- that that’s how we’re going to stay competitive for the future.  And that’s why these investments in education are so important.

      But, as I said, government alone can’t do it.  There has got to be a shift in American culture, where once again we buckle down and we say this stuff is important and it’s -- that’s why, Mark, the work you’re doing in Newark, for example, the work that the Gates Foundation are doing in philanthropic investments, in best practices and education -- especially around math and science training -- are going to be so important.

      We’ve got to lift -- we’ve got to lift our game up when it comes to technology and math and science.  That’s, hopefully, one of the most important legacies that I can have as President of the United States.  (Applause.)

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  All right.  So the next one is from another Facebook employee.  Here’s James Mitchell.  So, James Mitchell, where are you from?

      THE PRESIDENT:  Here’s James back here.

      Q    Hi, Mr. President.

      THE PRESIDENT:  Hey, James.

      Q    I'm James Mitchell, born in Chicago and raised out here in Cupertino, California.  I have yet another question for you about the debt and health care.

      THE PRESIDENT:  Go ahead.

      Q    So the biggest threat we have fiscally is the rise in health care costs.  Unfortunately, a lot of the solutions we hear to Medicare and Medicaid don’t involve actually slowing down the rise in health care costs.  Instead, they involve shifting costs to beneficiaries and states.  So my question is:  Can you talk a bit more about what provisions of the Affordable Health Care Act are designed to slow down the rise of health care costs, and what policies you’d like to see enacted in the future to continue to slow down the rise of health care costs?

      THE PRESIDENT:  Let me give you a couple of examples, because you’re exactly right in how you describe it.  I don’t want to just shift the health care costs on to the American people, I want to actually reduce health care costs.

      Let’s take the example of health IT.  We’re in Silicon Valley, so we can talk about IT stuff.  I’ll try to sound like I know what I’m talking about.  (Laughter.)  The health care system is one of the few aspects of our society where a lot of stuff is still done on paper.  The last time you guys went to a doctor’s office or maybe to your dentist’s office, how many people still had, like, to fill out a form on a clipboard?  Right?  And the reason for that is because a large chunk of our provider system is not automated.  So what ends up happening is you may go to your primary care physician; he does some basic tests, he sees something of concern, he refers you to a specialist.  You go to the specialist; he’ll do another test.

      You’re getting charged, or your insurance company is getting charged, for both those tests, as opposed to the test that was taken by your primary care physician being emailed to the specialist.  Or better yet, if it turns out that there may be three or four specialists involved, because it’s a difficult diagnosis -- this is all hypothetical; you look very healthy.  (Laughter.)  But let’s say there were a bunch of specialists.  What would be ideal would be if you get all the specialists together with the primary care physician the first time you’re seen so that you’re not paying for multiple visits as well as multiple tests.

      That’s not how it works right now.  Now, part of it is technology.  So what we did in the Affordable Care Act, building on what we did with the Recovery Act, is try to provide incentives to providers to start getting integrated, automated systems.  And it’s tough because the individual doctor may say to him or herself, I don’t want to put out the initial capital outlay; that’s expensive even though it may make my system more efficient later on.

      So providing some incentives, some help, for the front end investments for a community hospital or for individual providers so that we can slowly get this system more effective, that’s priority number one.

      We know it can be done, by the way.  Surprisingly enough, the health care system that is -- does the best job on this of anybody is actually the Veterans Administration, the VA health care system, because it’s a fully integrated system.  Everybody is working for the VA, all the doctors, all the hospitals, all the providers, so they’ve been able to achieve huge cost savings just because everybody is on a single system.     

      It’s also, though, how we reimburse doctors and how we reimburse hospitals.  So right now, what happens is, when you’ve taken those two tests, if you’re old enough to qualify for Medicare, well, each doctor sends their bill to Medicare and Medicare pays both bills.  And let’s say that you end up getting an operation.  They’ll send the bill for that, and Medicare pays that.  Let’s say they didn’t do a very good job, or you got sick in the hospital, and you are readmitted and you have to be treated again and they have to do the operation all over again.  Medicare then gets billed for the second operation.

      I mean, imagine if that’s how it worked when you bought a car.  So you go, you buy your car.  A week later, the car doesn’t work.  You go back to the dealer and they charged you to fix the bad job that they did in the first place.  Well, that’s what Medicare does all the time.  So we don’t provide incentives for performance.  We just provide -- we just pay for the number of qualified items that were procedures that were performed or tests that were performed by the provider.

      So what we want to do is to start changing how folks are reimbursed.  Let’s take a hospital.  We want to give -- this is sort of like Race to the Top, what Mark was talking about in education.  We want to be able to say to a hospital, if you do a really good job reducing infection rates in the hospital, which kill tens of thousands of people across America every year and are a huge cause for readmission rates, and we know that hospitals can drastically reduce those reinfection rates just by simple protocols of how employees are washing their hands and how they’re moving from room to room and so forth -- there are hospitals who have done it -- if we can say to a hospital, you’ll get a bonus for that, Medicare will reimburse you for instituting these simple procedures, that saves the whole system money.

      And that's what we’ve tried to do in the Affordable Care Act, is to start institutionalizing these new systems.  But it takes time because we’ve got a private sector system -- it’s not like the VA -- a bunch of individual doctors, individual hospitals spread out all across the country with private insurers.  So it’s not something that we can do overnight.

      Our hope is, is that over the next five years, we’re able to see significant savings through these mechanisms, and that will save everybody -- not just people who are on Medicare and Medicaid -- it will save everybody money including folks here at Facebook.  Because I’m sure that you guys provide health insurance and I suspect if you look at your health insurance bills they don't make you happy.  Okay.  (Applause.)

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  So we have time for only one more question.
      THE PRESIDENT:  All right.

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  It’s a question from Terry Atwater (ph) from Houston, Texas:  “If you had to do anything differently during your first four years, what would it be?”

      THE PRESIDENT:  Well, it’s only been two and a half, so I’m sure I’ll make more mistakes in the next year and a half.  The jury will still be out.  (Laughter.)  There are all sorts of day-to-day issues where I say to myself, oh, I didn't say that right, or I didn't explain this clearly enough, or maybe if I had sequenced this plan first as opposed to that one, maybe it would have gotten done quicker.

      Health care obviously was a huge battle, and if it hadn’t been for Nancy Pelosi and her leadership in the House and the great work that -- (applause) -- Anna Eshoo and Mike Honda and others did -- we wouldn’t have gotten it done if it hadn’t been for great work in Congress.

      But I do think that it was so complicated that at a certain point people just started saying, oh, this is typical Washington bickering.  And I’ve asked myself sometimes is there a way that we could have gotten it done more quickly and in a way that the American people wouldn’t have been so frustrated by it?   I’m not sure I could have because there’s a reason why it hadn’t gotten done in a hundred years.  It is a -- it’s hard to fix a system as big as health care and as complicated as our health care system.

      I can tell you that -- I think the best way to answer the question is what do I feel I still have to get done, where I still feel a huge sense of urgency.  I’ve talked about a couple of things.  Getting our deficits and debt under control in a balanced way I feel needs to happen while I’m President.  I don't want to leave it to the next President.

      Immigration -- something I mentioned -- we have not gotten done.  It’s something I care deeply about.  It’s the right thing for the country.  I want to get that done while I’m President.

      Energy -- we haven’t talked a lot about energy today, but first of all, $4-a-gallon gas really hurts a lot of people around this country.  It’s not because they're wasteful, but if you’re driving 50 miles to work and that's the only job you can find, and you can’t afford some hybrid so you’re stuck with the old beater that you’re driving around that gets eight miles a gallon, these gas prices are killing you right now.

      And so this is the reason why I’ve said that it is so important for us to invest in new approaches to energy.  We’ve got to have a long-term plan.  It means investing in things like solar and wind, investing in biofuels, investing in clean car technology.  It means converting the federal fleet 100 percent to fuel-efficient vehicles, because we’re a huge market maker. Obviously it turns out that I’ve got a lot of cars as President. (Laughter.)

      And if we’re out there purchasing electric cars and hybrids, that can help boost demand and drive down prices.  Continuing to increase fuel-efficiency standards on cars; increasing oil production but in an intelligent way.  I mean, those are all hugely important.  And by the way, we can pay for it.

      Let me say this.  We lose -- the Treasury loses $4 billion a year on subsidies to oil companies.  Now, think about this.  The top five oil companies have made somewhere between $75 billion and $125 billion every year for the last five years.  Nobody is doing better than Exxon.  Nobody is doing better than Shell or these other companies.  They are doing great.  They are making money hand over fist.  Well, maybe Facebook is doing a little better.  (Laughter.)  But you get the idea.  They’re doing really well.  They don’t need special tax breaks that cost us $4 billion.  So what we’ve said is, why can’t we eliminate the tax breaks for the oil companies who are doing great, and invest that in new energy sources that can help us save the planet?  (Applause.)

      So when it comes to energy, when it comes to immigration, when it comes to getting our deficit under control in a balanced and smart way, when it comes to improving our math and science education, when it comes to reinvesting in our infrastructure, we’ve just got a lot more work to do.

      And I guess my closing comment, Mark, would just be I hope that everybody here -- that you don’t get frustrated and cynical about our democracy.  I mean it is frustrating.  Lord knows it’s frustrating.  (Laughter.)  And I know that some of you who might have been involved in the campaign or been energized back in 2008, you’re frustrated that, gosh, it didn’t get done fast enough and it seems like everybody is bickering all the time.  Just remember that we’ve been through tougher times before.  We’ve always come out ascendant, we’ve always come out on top, because we’ve still got the best universities in the world, we’ve still got the most productive workers in the world, this is still the most dynamic, entrepreneurial culture in the world.

      If we come together, we can solve all these problems.  But I can’t do it by myself.  The only way it happens is if all of you still get involved, still get engaged.

      It hasn’t been that long since Election Day, and we’ve gone through some very, very tough times and we’ve still gotten a lot done.  We’ve still been able to get this economy recovering.  We’ve still been able to get health care passed.  We’ve still been able to invest in clean energy.  We’ve still been able to make sure that we overturn “don’t ask, don’t tell.”  We still made sure that we got two women on the Supreme Court.  We’ve made progress.  (Applause.)

      So rather than be discouraged, I hope everybody is willing to double down and work even harder.  Regardless of your political affiliation, you’ve got to be involved, especially the young people here, your generation.  If you don’t give us a shove, if you don’t give the system a push, it’s just not going to change.  And you’re going to be the ones who end up suffering the consequences.

      But if you are behind it, if you put the same energy and imagination that you put into Facebook into the political process, I guarantee you there’s nothing we can’t solve.

      All right?  Thank you, Mark.  (Applause.)

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  So I just want to thank you again.  It’s such an honor to have you here.

      THE PRESIDENT:  We had a great time.

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  And as a small token of our appreciation, in case for some reason you want to dress like me --

      THE PRESIDENT:  Nice, nice.

      MR. ZUCKERBERG:  A Facebook hoodie.  (Applause.)

      THE PRESIDENT:  This is a high-fashion statement right here. This is beautiful.

      Thank you very much, everybody.  Appreciate you.  (Applause.)

                                           END                         3:04 P.M. PDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a Town Hall in Annandale, Virginia

Northern Virginia Community College
Annandale, Virginia

10:33 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Hello, everybody! Thank you! Thank you so much. Everybody have a seat, have a seat.

It’s good to be back. Good to be back in Annandale. Good to be back at NOVA. How is everybody doing? (Applause.)

I want to make a couple of acknowledgments. First of all, Congressman Gerry Connolly is here. (Applause.) Dr. George Gabriel, the provost of Northern Virginia Community College, is here. (Applause.) And the president, Bob Templin, is here. (Applause.)

It is great to be back. I keep on coming back because Jill Biden tells me to keep on coming back. (Laughter.) I tend to listen to her. I always say Vice President Joe Biden’s best quality is Jill Biden. (Laughter.) Though Jill couldn’t be here today because she’s teaching all day and she does not skip class for anybody, including the President of the United States. (Laughter.)

What I want to do is just make a few quick remarks at the top, and then I’m just going to open it up for questions. This gives me a chance to get out of the immediate environs of Washington and hear directly from voters and have a conversation with them. And so I’m grateful that all of you took the time.

Last week, I laid out a plan to get America’s finances in order. It was a plan for shared prosperity through shared sacrifice and shared responsibility. So before I take your questions, I want to talk a little bit about this plan briefly, because it goes to the heart of what’s happening at this campus and schools like it all across America. And my plan does two big things: First, it cuts spending and it brings down the deficit. We all know how important that is. Just like any student on a tight budget -- and I’m assuming there are a few students on a tight budget here. Let’s see a show of hands. Any students on a tight budget? (Laughter.) I’ve been there. Just like you, America has to start living within its means.

For a long time, Washington acted like deficits didn’t matter. A lot of folks promised us a free lunch. So I think everybody needs to recall, we had a surplus back in 2000, 11 short years ago, but then we cut taxes for everybody, including millionaires and billionaires. We fought two wars and we created a new and expensive prescription drug program, and we didn’t pay for any of it.

And as the saying goes, there is no such thing as a free lunch. So we were left with a big deficit as I was coming into office, and then we had the worst recession since the Great Depression. And that made it worse, because in a recession two things happen: Number one, the federal government helps out states and localities to prevent teacher layoffs and firefighters and police officers from being laid off, and all that costs money. It requires more money to provide additional help to people who’ve lost their jobs or are in danger or losing their homes. So the federal government is putting more money out, but because of the recession it’s taking less money in in tax revenues, and so that grows the depression -- the deficit further.

Now, if we don’t close this deficit, now that the economy has begun to grow again, if we keep on spending more than we take in, it’s going to cause serious damage to our economy. Companies might be less likely to set up shop here in the United States of America. It could end up costing you more to take out a loan for a home or for a car, because if people keep on having to finance America’s debt, at a certain point they’re going to start charging higher interest rates. We won’t be able to afford investments in education or clean energy, or all the things that we care about because we know it’ll help drive our economy and create jobs.

So we’ve got to tackle this challenge. And I believe the right way to do it is to live up to an old-fashioned principle of shared responsibility. That means everybody has to do their part.

So what my plan does is it starts with combing the budget for savings wherever we can find it. And we had a good start a few weeks ago, when both parties came together around a compromise that cut spending but also kept the government open and kept vital investments in things that we care about. We need to build on those savings, and I’m not going to quit until we’ve found every single dime of waste and misspent money. We don’t have enough money to waste it right now. I promise you that. We’re going to check under the cushions -- you name it. (Laughter.)

But finding savings in our domestic spending only gets you so far. We’re also going to have to find savings in places like the defense budget. (Applause.) As your Commander-in-Chief, I will not cut a penny if it undermines our national security. But over the last two years, the Secretary of Defense Bob Gates has taken on wasteful spending that doesn’t protect our troops, doesn’t protect our nation -- old weapons systems, for example, that the Pentagon doesn’t want, but Congress sometimes keeps on stuffing into the budget. Well-connected special interests get these programs stuck in the budget even though the Pentagon says we don’t need these particular weapons systems.

So we’ve begun to cut those out. And Secretary Gates has found a lot of waste like that and has been able to save us $400 billion so far. I believe we can do that again. Four hundred billion dollars -- even in Washington, that’s real money. That funds a lot of Pell Grants. That funds a lot of assistance for communities like this one. (Applause.)

We’ll also reduce health care spending, and strengthen Medicare and Medicaid through some common-sense reforms that will get rid of, for example, wasteful subsidies to insurance companies. (Applause.) Reforms that can actually improve care -- like making it easier for folks to buy generic drugs, or helping providers manage care for the chronically ill more effectively. And we can reform the tax code so that it’s fair and it’s simple –- (applause) -- so the amount of taxes you pay doesn’t depend on whether you can hire a fancy accountant or not.

And we’ve also got to end tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. (Applause.) Let me say, this is not because we want to punish success. I suspect there are a bunch of young people in this gym that are going to end up being wealthy, and that’s good. We want you to. We want you to be able to go out there and start a business and create jobs and put other people to work. That’s the American way. But we are going to have to ask everybody to sacrifice. And if we’re asking community colleges to sacrifice, if we’re asking people who are going to see potentially fewer services in their neighborhoods to make a little sacrifice, then we can ask millionaires and billionaires to make a little sacrifice. (Applause.)

We can’t just tell the wealthiest among us, you don’t have to do a thing. You just sit there and relax, and everybody else, we’re going to solve this problem. Especially when we know that the only way to pay for these tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans is by asking seniors to pay thousands of dollars more for their health care, or cutting children out of Head Start, or doing away with health insurance for millions of Americans on Medicaid -- seniors in nursing homes, or poor children, or middle-class families who may have a disabled child, an autistic child.

This is not a trade-off that I’m willing to make. It’s not a trade-off that I think most Americans think is fair, no matter what party you belong to. That’s not who we are as a country. We’re better than that.

So that’s the first part of the plan -- cutting spending in a way that is fair and asks for shared responsibility. But here’s the second part of the plan, and that’s why I’m here at this campus today. Even as we’re making sure that government lives within its means, we’ve still got to invest in the future. We’ve still got to invest in you. We’ve still got to strengthen the middle class, and we’ve still got to grow the economy.

So, yes, we’re going to have to save wherever we can; and my proposal makes some tough cuts to some worthy programs and services that if we were in better times I’d continue to fund. But I’ll tell you what I’m not going to do. We’re not going to reduce the deficit by sacrificing investments in our infrastructure. We’re not going to allow our roads and our bridges to grow more and more congested while places like China are building new roads and new airports and thousands of mile of high-speed rail. If we want businesses to locate here in the United States of America and create jobs here, we’ve got to make sure that America is built to compete. We’ve got to have the best roads. We’ve got to have the quickest trains. We have to have the fastest broadband networks. That’s who we are.

Some folks in Washington also want to close the deficit by gutting our investments in things like clean energy or medical research or basic science. That’s not a viable choice. America has always been the world’s engine of innovation and discovery. That’s who we are. That’s how we’ve prospered. I don’t want other countries to lead in the industries of tomorrow. I want new technologies invented here in the United States. I want new solar panels and wind turbines and fuel-efficient cars and advanced batteries all to be made right here in the United States of America. I want us to invent them right here. (Applause.)

I mean, let’s just take energy as an example. Folks are out there dealing with gas at four bucks a gallon. It’s just another hardship, another burden, at a time when we’re just coming out of a recession and things are already pretty tight for folks. Now, whenever this happens, just like clockwork, you see politicians going in front of the cameras and they’ll say they’ve got a three-point plan for two-buck-a-gallon gas. (Laughter.) The truth is, the only real solution to helping families at the pump in the medium and the long term is clean energy. That’s how we’ll save families money. That’s how we’ll reduce our dependence on foreign oil. We’ve got to develop new technologies to lessen our reliance on a fuel that is finite and that we’ve got to import from other countries, including some very unstable parts of the world. And that’s why I think that cutting clean energy investments by 70 percent -- 70 percent, which has been proposed by some in Congress -– would be such a mistake.

Finally -- and I know this is near and dear to your hearts -- we’re not going to reduce our deficit by cutting education and eliminating college scholarships. (Applause.) In a world where our students face stiff competition from students from other countries, why would we make it harder for you to compete?

We see why it matters right here. More than 10,000 students at this college, at this college alone, are relying on Pell Grants to help pay their tuition. It’s almost 3,000 students at the Annandale campus alone -- 3,000 students just at this campus. How many of you who are in the audience have gotten a Pell Grant to help you pay your way? How many of you can’t afford to pay another $1,000 to go to school? I know what this is like. Scholarships helped make it possible for me and for Michelle to go to college. It’s fair to say I wouldn’t be President if it hadn’t been for somebody helping me be able to afford college. That’s why I think it would be such a huge mistake to balance the budget on the backs of students, by cutting scholarships by as much as $1,000, forcing students to go without them altogether.

I just spent the last two years making sure that instead of giving subsidies to banks, we were giving that money directly to students in the form of more grants and better deals on their loans. I’m not going to undo that after all the work we’ve done over the last two years. (Applause.) That’s not a smart way to close our deficit.

So that’s the bottom line. Just as it would undermine our future to ignore our deficits, it would also undermine our future to ignore the promise of students like you -– young people who come to this school to get a degree in the hopes of living out a better life, giving your children and your grandchildren a better life. That’s the core of the debate that we’re having right now. Both Democrats and Republicans agree that we should reduce the deficit. In fact, there is general agreement that we need to cut spending by about $4 trillion over the medium term. And when folks in Washington agree on anything, that’s a good sign. So the debate isn’t about whether we reduce our deficit. The debate is about how we reduce our deficit.

And my view is, we need to live within our means while still investing in our future -– cutting where we can while investing in education, investing in innovation, investing in infrastructure, and strengthening the safety net provided by programs like Medicare so that they’re there for this generation and for next generations. (Applause.)

And here’s the good news -- I believe that Democrats and Republicans can come together to get this done. It won’t be easy. There are going to be some fierce disagreements. Shockingly enough, there will be some politics played along the way. (Laughter.) There will be those who say that we’re too divided, that the partisanship is too stark. But I’m optimistic. I’m hopeful. Both sides have come together before. I believe we can do it again.

And here’s why this is important. Ultimately, this debate is not just about numbers on a page. It’s about making sure that you can make the most of your futures, that you can find a good job and achieve the life that you’re studying for in a nation that’s prosperous and rich with opportunities for anybody who’s willing to work hard to get ahead. That’s my focus. That’s what I think about first thing I wake up in the morning. That’s what I think about when I go to bed at night, and that’s what I think about all the hours in between.

That’s why I’m going to need your help. This is probably my most important message today: I’m going to need your help. I can’t afford to have all of you as bystanders in this debate. I want everybody to be in the game. I want you to hold me accountable. I want you to hold all of Washington accountable. There’s a way to solve this deficit problem in an intelligent way that is fair and shares sacrifices so that we can share opportunity all across America. But I can’t do that if your voices are not heard.

There are powerful voices in Washington; there are powerful lobbies and special interests in Washington. And they’re going to want to reduce the deficit on your backs. And if you are not heard, that’s exactly what’s going to happen.

If you are heard, then we’re going to meet this challenge. We are going to secure our future. We’re going to make our country stronger and more prosperous than it has ever been before.

With that, I want to take some questions. Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you. (Applause.) Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

All right, we’ve got some -- testing -- there we go. All right, so we’ve got some people in the audience, our wonderful volunteers, with microphones. When I call on you, if you could introduce yourself -- wait for the microphone so we can all hear you -- and then introduce yourself, and try to keep the question relatively short. (Laughter.) I will try to keep my answers relatively short. And I’m going to go boy, girl, boy, girl -- (laughter) -- just to make sure things are fair. All right?

Let me start with this young lady right there. That’s right, you. Yes, you. (Laughter.) I’ll call on you, too. (Laughter.) Go ahead.

Q I’m a student here at NOVA. And I’d like to know your plan to cut $4 trillion in up to 12 years -- is any of that toward the education budget?

THE PRESIDENT: No, what we’ve done is we have actually said that even as we are making all these spending cuts, we actually think that education spending should go up a little bit. (Applause.) And the reason is not that money solves all the problems in education -- it doesn’t. But whether it’s K-12 or higher education, money does make a difference if it’s used intelligently.

So, for example, what we’re doing at the K-12 level is we’ve designed a program called Race to the Top. And it’s a pretty straightforward program. What it says to school districts and states all across the country is, in addition to the usual money that you get for disadvantaged kids, the usual money that you get for disabled kids -- most of which is given out in formulas so it just depends on how many kids are there and how many kids are disadvantaged or disabled -- we’re also going to have a little bit of money that we save to give to schools and school districts that are really digging deep to reform themselves and to find new ways to improve performance.

So if you are doing a great job in recruiting and training new teachers, if you’re doing a great job in lifting up schools that are under-performing -- and there are about 2,000 schools in the country that are what are called dropout factories. I mean, they just are not doing the job. So if in that state you say, we’ve got a special plan to make sure those schools are doing a great job, if you’ve got innovative programs in math and science education, if you’re doing some things that increase accountability, improve excellence, then we’re going to give you a little extra money, but you’re going to have to reform to do it.

So the idea is not just spending more money for its own sake. It’s tying more money to improved performance and real reform. That’s what we’re doing at K-12.

Now, what we’re doing at the community college and university levels is we’ve redesigned some of the programs like Pell Grant and student loan programs. As I mentioned, it used to be that the student loan programs used to go through banks, and they would skim billions of dollars in profits, even though they weren’t really taking any risk because the federal government was guaranteeing the loans.

So we said, well, let’s just give the money directly to students. That will give us an extra several billion dollars that we can use to provide all of you additional scholarships, higher levels for your Pell Grants. But we’re also working with community colleges to see can we make sure that the programs at the community colleges are as effective as they can be to provide the training and the skills you need to succeed.

So, for example, one of the things that we’re doing is identifying where are the jobs of the future; can we get the private sector and businesses to help design curriculums ahead of time so that young people when they go through -- and if they’re taking out these loans and making these big investments, they know there’s going to be a job at the end of the tunnel.

So we need more money, but we also need more reform. And in order to provide more money for education, we’re having to make some cuts in some other areas that are going to be difficult in some cases. I mean, I just mentioned the defense budget, for example. There are certain aspects of the defense budget that I will not touch. For example, making sure that our troops have the equipment they need to be safe when they’re in theater -- (applause) -- making sure that when they come home veterans are getting the help that they need for post-traumatic stress disorder, or to be able to go to college themselves.

So there are certain commitments that we make to our men and women in uniform that are sacred, and we can’t cut back on those. But as I said, there are some weapons systems that just don’t work. There are some that may work but we don’t need. There are some that we just can’t afford. So we’re going to have to make some difficult decisions on some of those issues.

And let’s face it, there are also some social service programs that don’t work. I mean, one of the things that I always say is if you’re really progressive, you’ve got to be willing to examine whether something that you’re paying for is actually working, because if it isn’t working, that money could be used somewhere else to help people. So we’ve got to have a much more rigorous review of how effective various programs are. Some work and some don’t. And if they don’t work we should eliminate them and put that money into programs that do. Okay? All right.

It’s the gentleman’s turn, right back there.

Q Hi, Mr. President. I’ve lived overseas for the last 15 years and there has been very good medical care, but now that I’m here back in the States and on Medicare I find something interesting, and that is that Medicare won’t pay for any expenses overseas; it has to be here in this country, and that costs you money, the government, and it costs me money, but it’s good, of course, for the health care industry. Would you be interested in changing that?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think you’re raising an interesting point. First of all, Medicare is one of the most important pillars of our social safety net. (Applause.) And so before I get to your specific point, I want everybody to understand what the debate right now about Medicare that’s taking place between Democrats and Republicans is, because you’re going to need this as this debate unfolds over the next several months.

The House Republicans just passed a proposal, and their main plan to reduce our long-term deficits and debt is to turn Medicare into a voucher program. What would happen would be that right now seniors, when they get -- once they’re on Medicare, you basically are able to get the care that you need and Medicare covers it for you. What would happen under this proposal is you’d get a set amount of money; you could then go out under the private market place and buy insurance, but if the voucher you were getting for $6,000 or $7,000 and the insurance company said it’s going to cost you $12,000, well, you’re going to have to make up that difference.

And so it’s estimated by the Congressional Budget Office, which is an independent, bipartisan sort of referee in Congress that determines these things -- they figure that seniors would end up paying twice as much for their health care as they are currently. At least twice as much. And more importantly, it would get worse over time, because health care inflation goes up a lot faster than regular inflation. So your health care costs keep on going up and up and up; the voucher doesn’t. Each year, more and more costs coming out of pocket.

Now, I think that is the wrong way to go. That would fundamentally change Medicare as we know it -- (applause) -- and I’m not going to sign up for that. Having said that, we are going to have to reform Medicare and our entire health care system in order to improve quality for the amount of money that we spend -- because we spend much more money in this country on health care than any other industrialized country, and our outcomes aren’t better.

And that’s what we started doing with health care reform last year. Essentially what we said was let’s not just dump these additional costs on seniors -- I mean, it’s not hard to save the government money if you’re willing to just say, here, you pay for it. That’s not a solution. The question is, how do we actually make health care costs lower overall? That means that we work with providers to say, how can you do a better job providing care to the chronically ill?

About 15, 20 percent of the patients account for 80 percent of the costs because they have chronic illnesses like diabetes. Can we incentivize providers, doctors, hospitals to do a better job monitoring those illnesses, preventing those illnesses, treating those illnesses in a comprehensive way so that the overall costs to the system go down? Can we stop with the five or six tests, all of which cost money, and just give you one test and have them -- the results emailed to everybody that you need to deal with? That can save us money.

So there are a whole host of steps that we can take that could make a big difference in reducing health care costs overall. And keep in mind, even if you’re not on Medicare, the overall costs of health care are being driven up for you and for -- even if you’re on private health care -- you’re paying about $1,000 per family in extra costs because of all the uncompensated care that comes in, all the folks who show up at the emergency room, all the medical errors that take place at hospitals that end up costing the system money as a whole. So if we can squeeze those inefficiencies out of the health care system, then we can maintain Medicare as we know it, but still reduce the cost to the federal government and to everybody in society.

Now -- uh-oh. (Laughter.) We don’t need any health care, do we? Nobody fell?

To get to your question, then, my preference would be that you don’t have to travel to Mexico or India to get cheap health care. I’d like you to be able to get it right here in the United States of America that’s high quality. (Applause.)

So before we went on the path of you can go somewhere else to get your health care, let’s work to see if we can reduce the costs of health care here in the United States of America. That’s going to make a big difference. And Medicare is a good place to start because Medicare is such a big purchaser that if we can start changing how the health care system works inside of Medicare, then the entire system changes. All the doctors, all the hospitals, they will all adapt to these best practices.

And the same is true, by the way, for prescription drugs. One of the things that we want to do as part of our health care reform package is let’s start doing a better job of negotiating better prices for prescription drugs here in the United States so that you don’t feel like you’re getting cheated because you’re paying 30 percent more or 20 percent more than prescription drugs in Canada or Mexico.

Re-importation is a short-term solution that a lot of seniors are resorting to, but why should drugs that are invented here in the United States end up being more expensive than another country? Well, the reason is, is because drug companies can get away with it here and they can’t get away with it there, and we should change some of those systems to make it cheaper for everybody here. But that’s going to make a huge difference in terms of reducing our deficit.

So, thank you. (Applause.)

All right, it’s a young lady’s turn -- right here. Hold on, let’s -- can we get a mic over here, or do I need to lend her my mic? Okay.

Q Hi, Mr. President. My name is Vinita Griffin (ph). I’m a late student here at Northern Virginia Community College. I’m in my second career now. My question is, in about 15 years I’ll be eligible for Social Security. And I’m part of the baby boomer generation, and I don’t know if there will be Social Security when I get ready to -- and I probably won’t retire for another 25 years, I’m thinking.

THE PRESIDENT: No, you look pretty young. (Laughter.) You look like you’re -- you look like you’ve got a lot of career left in you.

Q I’m about your age. But, yes, so I figure another 25 years I’ll be working. But I don’t know if it will be there when I need it, and I’m concerned about that.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, let me talk about Social Security. The big drivers of our deficit are health care costs. I mean, the thing that we’ve really got to get control of is Medicare and Medicaid. That’s what’s skyrocketing really fast. Because not only is the population getting older, but health care costs are just going up a lot faster than people’s wages and salaries -- or tax revenues to the federal government.

Social Security is a problem but one that we can solve much more easily. So the first answer to your question is, Social Security will definitely be there when you retire. (Applause.) I’m absolutely confident about that. I am absolutely confident about that.

Now, here’s the thing. If we don’t do anything on Social Security, if we just don’t -- if we don’t touch it at all, then what would happen is, by the time you retire, or maybe just a couple years after you retire, you might find that instead of getting every dollar that you were counting on, you’re only getting 75 cents out of that dollar. Because what’s happening is the population is getting older; there are more retirees per worker and more money starts going out than is coming in.

So we do have to stabilize Social Security’s finances, but we can do that with some relatively modest changes -- unlike health care, where we’ve got to get in and work with providers and really get some much more substantial reforms. With Social Security, it’s just a matter of tweaking how it currently works.

Now, politically, it’s hard to do. Politically, it’s hard to do. For example -- I’ll just give you one example of a change that would make a difference in Social Security. Right now you only pay a Social Security tax up to a certain point of your income. So a little bit over $100,000, your Social Security -- you don’t pay Social Security tax.

Now, how many people are making less than $100,000 a year? Don’t be bashful. (Laughter.) The point is, for the vast majority of Americans, every dime you earn, you’re paying some in Social Security. But for Warren Buffett, he stops paying at a little bit over $100,000 and then the next $50 billion he’s not paying a dime in Social Security taxes.

So if we just made a little bit of an adjustment in terms of the cap on Social Security, that would do a significant amount to stabilize the system. And that’s just an example of the kinds of changes that we can make. (Applause.)

So we are going to have to make some changes in Social Security, but it’s not the major driver of our deficit. And what I’ve proposed is let’s work on Social Security, but let’s not confuse that with this major budget debate that we’re having about how we deal with both spending and revenues because that is the problem that is going to require some really hard work and some bipartisan cooperation. Okay?

All right. It’s a gentleman -- gentleman in the white shirt right there in the middle. You got three guys right in a row, I’m choosing the guy right in the middle. There you go. Right there.

Q Mr. President, my name is Mitchell Holliman (ph). I’m a student here at NOVA, electrical and computer engineering. And I’m really concerned about the clean energy solutions because with the deficit that we have, most of those solutions and alternatives are far more expensive than the things that we have in place now. So how are we going to reduce the deficit and at the same time develop clean energy alternatives as well as removing the current systems that we have in place that are dependent on oil and other things from other countries?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, it’s a great question. (Applause.) And so -- let me start with gas prices because I know that that’s on everybody’s minds and it’ll -- you can sit down. (Laughter.) I’ll admit to you, it’s been a while since I filled up at the tank -- filled up at the pump. (Laughter.) You know, Secret Service doesn’t let me get out -- (laughter) -- and they don’t let me drive anymore.

But it wasn’t that long ago that I did have to fill up my gas tank. And I know that if you’ve got a limited budget and you just watch that hard-earned money going away to oil companies that will once again probably make record profits this quarter, it’s pretty frustrating. And if you’re driving out of necessity 50 miles a day to work and you can’t afford to buy some fancy new hybrid car so you’re stuck with the old beater that is getting you eight miles a gallon, that’s pretty frustrating.

Now, I wish I could tell you that there was some easy, simple solution to this. It is true that a lot of what’s driving oil prices up right now is not the lack of supply. There’s enough supply. There’s enough oil out there for world demand. The problem is, is that oil is sold on these world markets, and speculators and people make various bets, and they say, you know what, we think that maybe there’s a 20 percent chance that something might happen in the Middle East that might disrupt oil supply, so we’re going to bet that oil is going to go up real high. And that spikes up prices significantly.

We’re now in a position where we can investigate if there’s unfair speculation. We’re going to be monitoring gas stations to make sure there isn’t any price gouging that’s taking advantage of consumers. But the truth is that it is a world commodity, and when prices spike up like this there aren’t a lot of short-term solutions. What we have are medium- and long-term solutions.

Now, one solution is making sure that we’re increasing production of U.S. oil. And we have actually continually increased U.S. production, so U.S. production is as high as it’s ever been. The problem is we only have about 2 to 3 percent of the world’s oil reserves, and we use 25 percent of the world’s oil. So when you say we should be using traditional sources, the problem is we’ve got finite sources when it comes to oil. And that means we’ve got to find some replacements.

There are a couple of alternatives. One are biofuels. I was down in Brazil; a third of their cars are run on biofuels -- mostly ethanol made out of sugar cane. We should be able to develop technologies where we are building more efficient biofuels than we’re currently using. Right now we use -- most of our ethanol comes from corn. It would be better if we can get farmers to work with industry to figure out whether we can use woodchips or algae or switchgrass or other biomass that can create fuel that is competitive with gasoline. So that’s point number one.

Point number two is we should be looking at electric cars and how can we produce more effective electric cars, cheaper electric cars, here in the United States. Technologically, it’s not feasible to get a car that runs 150 miles a gallon, or maybe no gallons of gas. And you just get your car, you plug it in at night in your garage; whatever energy is stored in your car battery goes back into your house, and then when you come back out at night it’s recharged and you’re ready to go.

You’re right right now that hybrid cars and electric cars are more expensive than regular cars, but partly that’s because we haven’t increased demand enough for it that the unit costs have gone down. And the more you produce of something, the cheaper it gets, right?

You remember what it used to cost you for a flat-screen TV, or a laptop computer. But as volume picked up, technology improves, costs go down. Well, the same thing could be true for electric cars, so one of the things we’re trying to do is to increase demand on electric cars.

It turns out that the federal government has a lot of cars, so we’re saying let’s have the federal government make sure that 100 percent of our cars are energy-efficient cars to create a better market for those cars that can help drive costs down.

We’ve also increased fuel-efficiency standards on cars for the first time in 30 years. That will save about 1.8 billion gallons -- or barrels -- of oil, billion barrels of oil. And we can now increase fuel-efficiency standards on cars and trucks, and that could make a huge difference because now consumers are just -- whenever they go to buy a new car, by necessity that car is going to have higher mileage standards. All that drives down demand and can reduce gas prices overall.

But there’s one last component to this, and you just pointed out if we’re going to have electric cars, we still have to have electricity and how do we produce electricity?

Now, it’s true that coal is something that’s very plentiful in America. We’re sort of the Saudi Arabia of coal. The challenge with coal is that although it’s very cheap, it’s also dirty. And it can create the kinds of air pollution that not only is contributing to climate change but is also creating asthma for kids nearby.

You got asthma? Okay. And so sucking that stuff in is not ideal.

So what we’ve said is let’s invest in clean coal technology that potentially can capture some of these particulates and some of the carbon dioxide that’s going into the atmosphere. If we can do that in a energy-efficient -- in a cost-efficient way, then that would be hugely helpful to us.

But we also have to look at other ways of generating electricity. It’s true that solar and wind right now are more expensive than coal, for example, or natural gas. But that doesn’t mean that it will always be the case; it just means that we haven’t developed the technologies to maximize our ability to capture and store electricity through those means.

I just mentioned natural gas. We have a lot of natural gas here in this country. The problem is, is that extracting it from the ground -- the technologies aren’t as developed as we’d like and so there are some concerns that it might create pollution in our groundwater, for example. So we’ve got to make sure that if we’re going to do it, we do it in a way that doesn’t poison people.

The point is, is that there’s not going to be any single silver bullet. What we’ve got to do is develop all these energy alternatives. All of them, though, are going to require some investment in new ways of thinking, new basic science, new research. And typically no single company is going to be making those investments because it’s not profitable for them to do it.

And that means that the federal government historically has stepped in and said, you know what, we’ll make this investment in basic research and then we’ll let somebody else commercialize it and make money on it. That’s how we invented the Internet. That’s how we invented the GPS system. That’s how we invented the bar code.

Those were all federal investments that eventually spread out throughout the economy and made everybody richer and better off. And that’s what we’ve got to do with energy as well, but that requires an investment and I’m prepared to make that investment. I think we all should be. All right? Thank you. (Applause.)

All right. It’s a young lady’s turn -- right there, yes.

Q Hi, Mr. President. I’m Dr. Rebecca Hayes. I’m a history professor at Manassas. And my question is, are you encouraged to see more of the bipartisanship like the Gang of Six that has formed recently addressing some of the very concerns you’ve mentioned? Do you think we’re going to see more of that and are you going to stay behind it?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I am encouraged that over the last four or five months we’ve been able to strike some deals between Democrats and Republicans that a lot of people didn’t expect us to be able to do. Our conflicts and our disagreements tend to get more attention than our agreements. And the easiest way to be on TV is to call somebody a name. (Laughter.) Right?

I mean, if you are -- if you say something mean about somebody, that will get you on TV. If you say something nice about somebody, everybody -- you figure that’s -- well, that’s boring, I’m not interested.

So I think that there is a huge opportunity for us to be able to work together, particularly on this deficit issue. As I said, we now agree that it’s a problem. Everybody agrees it’s a problem. Everybody agrees about how much we have to lower the deficit by over the medium term, and that we’ve got to deal with long-term health care costs in order to get this under control. So it’s pretty rare where Washington says this is a problem; everybody agrees on that; and everybody agrees on about how much we need to do to solve the problem.

The big question that is going to have to be resolved is, how do we do it? And there is -- I don’t want to lie to you, there is a big philosophical divide right now. I believe that you’ve got to do it in a balanced way. I believe that you’ve got to, yes, have spending cuts, but you can’t cut things like education or basic research or infrastructure down to the bone.

I believe that people who have been really blessed in this society like me and have a very, very, very good income can afford to pay a little bit more -- nothing crazy, just go back to the rates that existed when Bill Clinton was President. That wasn’t that long ago -- (applause) -- that that’s a fair thing to do, especially if it makes sure that seniors are still getting their Medicare and kids are still going to Head Start. Why wouldn’t I want to make that sacrifice? Look, and I think most wealthy Americans feel the same way.

I want to live in a society that’s fair -- not just out of charitable reasons, but because it improves my life. If there are young people out there who are going to good schools and have opportunity, if I’m not driving by and seeing homeless folks on the streets, why wouldn’t I want to have a society where I knew that the American Dream was available for everybody?

So the question is, how do we achieve the same goal? Can we do it in a more balanced way? And the House Republican budget that they put forward, they didn’t just not ask the wealthy to pay more; they actually cut their taxes further.

Now, we just had Tax Day, so nobody wants to pay taxes. Let me tell you, I looked at my tax form and I though, hmm -- there is a moment there where you look at the figure you’re paying and you say, wow, I don’t -- let me think about my position on taxing the wealthy here. (Laughter.) I understand that. Nobody volunteers and says, boy, I’m just wild to pay more taxes. But it’s a matter of values and what we prioritize. And I certainly don’t think my taxes should be even lower. That’s -- I think America wants a smart government. It wants a lean government. It wants a accountable government. But we don’t want no government.

According to the Republican budget that was passed, for example, we would have to eliminate transportation funding by a third. We’d have to cut transporting funding by a third. You remember when that bridge in Minnesota collapsed with all those people on it? And there was a big hue and cry: How can this happen in America? Well, the National Society of Engineers, they’ve looked around and they give us a D when it comes to infrastructure. Our roads, our bridges, our sewer systems are all deteriorating.

We don’t even have a serious high-speed rail infrastructure in this country. Our broadband lines are slower than places like South Korea. Well, so what, we cut transportation by another third, and what’s going to happen to America? We’re just going to have potholes everywhere? (Laughter.) We’re just going to have bridges collapsing everywhere? Are we going to continue to have airports that are substandard? Are we going to go to other countries and suddenly realize that China and South Korea and all of Europe all have better infrastructure than we do, and we think that businesses are going to come here and invest? Or do we think that at some point companies say, you know what, America has got a second-rate infrastructure and it costs us too much money because our trucks going over those potholes are getting messed up?

So that’s the choice that we’re going to have to make. This debate is going to be very important, though. And as I said before, I’m going to need all of you involved in this debate. You’ve got to make your voices heard. And I would say, I’m not just talking to Democrats here. Republicans, I want you to be able to talk to your members of Congress and say, yes, I’m serious about reducing the deficit; yes, I want limited government; yes, I want reductions in spending -- but I do think that we’ve got to make investments in basic research and infrastructure and education, and so let’s do it in a balanced way.

And if we do that, we can come up with a compromise that is effective, that puts America’s fiscal house in order, but also allows us to win the future. That’s my goal. I’m going to need your help, though.

Thank you very much, everybody. God bless you. Thank you. (Applause.)

END
11:31 A.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at Easter Prayer Breakfast

East Room

8:39 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much.  Thank you.  Please, please have a seat.

Well, it is absolutely wonderful to be here with all of you today.  I see so many good friends all around the room.

Before I begin, I want to acknowledge one particular member of my administration who I’m extraordinarily proud of and does not get much credit, and that is USAID Administrator, Dr. Raj Shah, who is doing great work with faith leaders.  (Applause.)  Where’s Raj?  Where is he?  There he is right there.  Raj is doing great work with faith leaders on our Feed the Future global hunger program, as well as on a host of other issues.  We could not be prouder of the work that he’s doing.  I also want to acknowledge Congressman Mike McIntyre and his wife, Dee.  (Applause.)  Mike -- as some of you know, obviously, North Carolina was ravaged by storms this past weekend, and our thoughts and prayers are with all the families who have been affected down there.  I know that Mike will be helping those communities rebuild after the devastation.

To all the faith leaders and the distinguished guests that are here today, welcome to our second annual -- I’m going to make it annual, why not?  (Laughter and applause.)  Our second Easter Prayer Breakfast.  The Easter Egg Roll, that’s well established.  (Laughter.)  The Prayer Breakfast we started last year, in part because it gave me a good excuse to bring together people who have been such extraordinary influences in my life and such great friends.  And it gives me a chance to meet and make some new friends here in the White House.

I wanted to host this breakfast for a simple reason -– because as busy as we are, as many tasks as pile up, during this season, we are reminded that there’s something about the resurrection -- something about the resurrection of our savior, Jesus Christ, that puts everything else in perspective. 

We all live in the hustle and bustle of our work.  And everybody in this room has weighty responsibilities, from leading churches and denominations, to helping to administer important government programs, to shaping our culture in various ways.  And I admit that my plate has been full as well.  (Laughter.)  The inbox keeps on accumulating.  (Laughter.)
 
But then comes Holy Week.  The triumph of Palm Sunday.  The humility of Jesus washing the disciples’ feet.  His slow march up that hill, and the pain and the scorn and the shame of the cross.

And we’re reminded that in that moment, he took on the sins of the world -- past, present and future -- and he extended to us that unfathomable gift of grace and salvation through his death and resurrection.

In the words of the book Isaiah:  “But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities:  the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.”

This magnificent grace, this expansive grace, this “Amazing Grace” calls me to reflect.  And it calls me to pray.  It calls me to ask God for forgiveness for the times that I’ve not shown grace to others, those times that I’ve fallen short.  It calls me to praise God for the gift of our son -- his Son and our Savior.

And that’s why we have this breakfast.  Because in the middle of critical national debates, in the middle of our busy lives, we must always make sure that we are keeping things in perspective.  Children help do that.  (Laughter.)  A strong spouse helps do that.  But nothing beats scripture and the reminder of the eternal.

So I’m honored that all of you have come here this Holy Week to join me in a spirit of prayer, and I pray that our time here this morning will strengthen us, both individually as believers and as Americans.  And with that, let me introduce my good friend, Bishop Vashti McKenzie, for our opening prayer.  (Applause.)

END
8:45 A.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at Presentation of the Commander-in-Chief Trophy to the Air Force Academy

Rose Garden

***The spelling of Cadet Reggie Rembert’s name has been corrected below.

1:46 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  Well, everybody, please be seated.  Welcome to the White House, and congratulations on winning the Commander-in-Chief trophy.  (Applause.)

For the first time in eight long years, this trophy is going back to Colorado Springs.  Today we’re honored to be joined by the Superintendent of the Air Force Academy, Lieutenant General Michael Gould, and the Air Force Chief of Staff, General Norton Schwartz.  Thank you both for being here.  Very much appreciate it.  (Applause.)

Most of all, though, I want to congratulate the cadets who are standing behind me.  Until this year, no one on this team knew what it felt like to beat Army, to beat Navy, to visit the White House, and to earn football bragging rights over the other branches.  Now you know the feeling.  (Applause.)  They also know what it feels like not just to be a good service academy team, but to be a good team, period.  Put up 350 rushing yards against Oklahoma.  Finished 9-4 after what Coach Calhoun called the toughest schedule a service academy ever played.  And to cap it all off, to win in a bowl game against Georgia Tech.  (Applause.)  That’s impressive.  Georgia Tech has three times as many students.

Of course, I hear the victory that was sweetest of all was finally beating that Navy team.  I’m told that as soon as the final whistle blew, the loudspeakers started blasting Etta James singing “At Last.”  (Laughter.)  The entire cadet wing -– usually some of the most disciplined young men and women you’ll ever see -– just rushed the field and sang the alma mater with the team.

So this is a group that has a lot to be proud of.  But, obviously, the most impressive thing about these young men, the thing that sets them apart, is that being a football player isn’t what defines them.  They’re airmen first.  And more important than any bowl game or trophy is the commitment that they’ve made to serve this country.

That’s why last summer, when almost every other Division I team was working out and running through drills together, these players were scattered around the world learning the skills they needed long after they take off their jerseys and hang up their helmets.

Quarterback Tim Jefferson was at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware learning about C-17s.  Tight end Josh Freeman was stationed in Japan.  Cornerback Reggie Rembert was getting up every morning at 3 a.m. to take summer classes, command a squadron of 127 freshman cadets, and spend whatever time he had left organizing 7-on-7 practices for players that were still in town.

And sometimes being away from their teammates meant that players had to come up with some creative ways to get in shape.  Quarterbacks had to find people to throw to.  Receivers had to find people to throw to them.  The conditions weren’t always ideal.  But as Coach Calhoun, a former Falcon himself, said, “The good ones will find a way.”

This team found a way.  And now that the season is over, these seniors will have to adjust to a very different life as they become part of the finest military that the world has ever known.  It won’t always be easy.  I’ve heard linemen like Tyler Schonsheck had to drop 40 or 50 pounds in order to fit in an ejection seat for pilot training this summer.  Where is this guy?  (Laughter.)  That’s a big guy.

But cadets know that what’s expected of them is to do whatever it takes.  And I know that the camaraderie, the work ethic, the brotherhood that all of you have built as part of this team will serve you well as you defend freedom around the world.  As President, I have no greater honor, no greater responsibility, than serving as your Commander in-Chief.  And as all of you begin your service to our nation, I want you to know that we are going to do everything in our power to help you succeed and help you come home safe.  You all make us incredibly proud.

So, again, congratulations and God bless you.  (Applause.)

COACH CALHOUN:  Thank you, again, Mr. President, for everybody in attendance today.  And, you know, undoubtedly these are absolutely remarkable young people.  And with the accolades the President covered there on the field -- quite, quite impressive.

And yet their greatest achievements, their greatest deeds, their greatest quality of work will begin 37 days from now when these young men graduate from the United States Air Force Academy and have an opportunity to be a part of the finest team there is -- and that is to lead, to be an officer for the United States of America.

And, Mr. President, at this time we have a couple of young men that want to share a couple of gifts with you, sir.  So first of all, Mr. Jared Tew, our starting fullback.  (Laughter and applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  That's it.

CADET TEW:  Mr. President, we’d like to present you with an official Air Force football with your name on it, and the scores of both the Army and Navy game.

THE PRESIDENT:  There you go.  (Laughter and applause.)

CADET REMBERT:  Also, sir, we’d like to present you with an official Obama jersey.  We were going to go with number one because there’s no number one on the Air Force Falcon football team because there’s only one “one” in our hearts and that's the Air Force One.  Also we were going to go with 44, but Navy did that last year, so we don't -- we didn't want to go with that.  (Laughter.)  So we wanted to be a little bit more personal, so we gave President -- Mr. President, we gave him number 23 because he’s actually worn this and played a sport in this number.

THE PRESIDENT:  My old number -- before Michael Jordan, by the way.  (Laughter and applause.)

CADET REMBERT:  Yes, sir.  (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much, everybody.  Enjoy this wonderful day.  Thank you.

END
1:52 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a DNC Event

Navy Pier
Chicago, Illinois

9:16 P.M. CDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, Chicago!  (Applause.)  It is good to be back in Chicago!  (Applause.)  It’s good to be back in Navy Pier.  (Applause.)  And I didn’t have to pay for parking.  (Laughter.) 

I remember driving around that parking lot -- (laughter) -- taking Malia and Sasha to the Children’s Museum.  Can't find a spot.  (Laughter.)  You keep on going up, around and around and around.  (Laughter.)  It’s a lot smoother these days.  (Applause.) 

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Love you!

THE PRESIDENT:  Love you back.  (Applause.) 

Everybody is a special guest, but we've got some super, super special guests.  First of all, we've got in the house “Mr. Cub” -- Ernie Banks is here.  (Applause.)  Second of all, we've got a former Bull who doesn’t look like he’s aged at all -- (laughter) -- still has that baby-face -- B.J. Armstrong is in the house.  (Applause.) 

I want to thank Colby Caillat for performing tonight -- (applause) -- and she’s going to be at White House Easter Egg Roll.  That's big.  (Laughter.)  You know you're big time.  (Laughter.)  Justin Bieber was just there.  (Applause.) 

Although I have to confess -- this is a little side note.  The White House Christmas party or “Christmas in Washington” event was going on.  And Usher was there and there were a bunch of performers.  And there was this little guy who really sang well, great entertainer.  And I was sort of acknowledging all the crowd, and I said, “And give it up for Justin “Biber.”  (Laughter.)  I didn’t know him at the time.  And everybody yelled, “It’s ‘Beeber’.”  And Malia and Sasha were mortified -- (laughter) -- when they heard that I had mispronounced his name. Anyway, that's an aside.

Rashard Mendenhall is in the house.  (Applause.)  Chicagoan and Pittsburgh Steeler. 

Now, in addition, before I begin, I want to pay tribute to a friend who has recently taken over this town.  He’s become the most powerful man in Chicago.  Unbelievable energy, sharp elbows -- (laughter) -- but has brought Chicagoans a new sense of hope about our future.  Give it up for Derek Rose.  (Applause.) 

AUDIENCE:  MVP!  MVP!  MVP!

THE PRESIDENT:  MVP!  MVP!  MVP!

I suppose Rahm is doing a pretty good job, too.  (Laughter.) 

And as good as Derek is, the Bulls would not be where they need to be if it were not for -- Mr. Joakim Noah is in the house. (Applause.)  And his mom is there, and I love his mom, too.  She’s wonderful.  Yes, it’s mom, you know, come on.  (Laughter.) 

Now, even as we are all excited about what the future holds for Chicago under its new mayor, we also owe Rahm’s predecessor, my chief of staff’s big brother, a huge debt of gratitude for taking a city that was already a great American city and turning it into a great world city, healing some of the divisions in this city.  We are grateful for Richard Daley.  Give it up for Richard Daley.  (Applause.)

But I can tell you that I like to tease Rahm.  I joke about him.  This is a guy who stepped in, in one of the toughest jobs in Washington -- if not the toughest job -- and stood by my side every step of the way.  And I have seen how he performs under pressure.  I have seen the kind of commitment that he has to the American people.  You guys made a good choice.  He is going to be a great mayor, and I am proud to call Rahm Emanuel my friend.  (Applause.)

So I look around the room and as crowded as it is, I just see friends everywhere.  (Applause.)  People I’ve been knowing for a long, long time.  It’s good to be home.  (Applause.)  It is good to be home.

This is the city where I fell in love and started a family. This is the city where I got my start in politics 25 years ago, working with churches on the South Side to bring jobs to the jobless and hope to the hopeless.  It’s where I stood with so many of you in Grant Park, almost two and a half years ago when we showed the world that all things are possible in the United States of America.  (Applause.)

And some of you may have heard this is where we’re going to be basing our headquarters for the 2012 campaign, right here, back home in Chicago.  (Applause.) 

Now, this is the first time in modern history that a sitting President has based their reelection campaign outside of Washington.  (Applause.)  But I decided I don't want our campaign to be just hearing all the pundits and the powerbrokers.  I want our campaign to be here because you guys are the ones who got me started.   (Applause.)  I see people in this audience who supported me when nobody could pronounce my name.  (Laughter.)  I see folks who supported me when I ran for Congress and got a beatdown -- (laughter) -- and then helped to nurse me back to health. 

One of the things that I’ve seen again and again over the last couple of years is the conversation in Washington is very different from the conversation around kitchen tables and office coolers.  And I wanted to make sure that our campaign was rooted in your hopes and rooted in your dreams.  (Applause.)  I want to make sure we’re putting the campaign in your hands -- in the same hands, the same organizers, the same volunteers who proved the last time that together ordinary folks can do extraordinary things.  That’s what this campaign is about.  (Applause.) 

Now, we’re all a bit older.  (Laughter.)  Some of us are a little bit grayer. 

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Oh, yeah.  But you look good!  (Laughter.)   

THE PRESIDENT:  I’ll let Michelle know you said that.  (Laughter.) 

But all of us can remember that night in Grant Park, the excitement in the streets, the sense of hope, the sense of possibility.  And yet, even as we celebrate -- you remember what I said back then?  I said our work wasn’t ending; our work was just beginning -- because while it was clear that I was going to have a full plate going into Election Day, I’d be lying if I said that I knew how a plate -- how full that plate would be.  (Laughter.)  It’s been a little fuller than we imagined. 

We took office in the middle of the worst recession in our lifetimes -- one that left millions of Americans without jobs, had folks losing their homes.  A recession so bad that many families are still grappling with the aftershocks, even though the economy is growing again. 

But the economy is growing again. We’re creating jobs again. (Applause.)  Over the last four months we’ve seen the largest drop in unemployment since 1984.  (Applause.)  Over the last 13 months we’ve added nearly two million private sector jobs.  That didn’t happen by accident.  It happened because we made some tough choices -- like saving the American auto industry.

You remember they said it couldn't be done.  There were some folks who were going to write it off, but it was the right thing to do.  And now GM is hiring back every single worker they laid off -- (applause) -- and every one of the Big Three American automakers are making a profit once again.  That's because of the tough choices we made, because of the work you did getting me into office.  (Applause.)   

So make no mistake.  Because of you, we’ve been able to make real progress over the last few years.  Because of you, we were able to prevent another Great Depression.  Because of you, we’re making the most meaningful education reforms in a generation through a competition called Race to the Top, raising teachers up and raising learning standards in schools and states across America. 

Because of you, we overcame the status quo and reformed Wall Street, making sure that we’ve got some of the toughest consumer protections so you won’t get cheated when you apply for a mortgage or when you take out a credit card.  (Applause.)

Because of you, we did what we’ve been trying to do for almost a century and we made sure that everybody in this society of ours, if you get sick you don’t have to go bankrupt.  (Applause.)  If you get sick you don’t have to mortgage your house.  If your child has a preexisting condition they’re still going to be cared for because we passed health care reform that provided coverage for 30 million Americans.  (Applause.)  Because of you, we were able to rein in the worst abuses of the health care industry.  Because of you, not here in the United States of America are we going to have people who are on the streets because they get sick. 

Now, along the way we did a few other things.  We signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter bill, very simple idea that women need to get paid the same as men for the same kind of work.  (Applause.)  We finally overturned the injustice of “don't ask, don't tell,” and we said that everybody can serve their country. They don't have to lie to serve the country that they love.  (Applause.)  We put two women on the Supreme Court, including the first Latina justice.  (Applause.) 

We brought back 100,000 troops from Iraq and ended our combat mission there because we knew -- (applause) -- we knew that it was time. 

And along the way, we had to deal with pirates.  (Laughter.) Who thought we were going to have to deal with pirates?  (Laughter.)  That wasn’t in my campaign platform.  (Laughter.)  Pandemic, earthquakes.  Now --

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Oil spill.

THE PRESIDENT:  Oil spill.  Don’t forget oil spill.  Golly.  (Laughter.) 

Now, part of the hopefulness and the anticipation we all felt that night in Grant Park was also about what we could do to secure and restore America’s standing in the world.  So that’s why we strengthened our alliances.  We signed historic arms control agreements, secured loose nuclear materials.  (Applause.) That’s why we’re on the right side of history now throughout the Middle East, because we believe in preventing innocents from getting slaughtered, and we believe in human rights for all people.  (Applause.) 

That’s why we’ve taken the fight to al Qaeda.  That’s why we’re still working in Iraq to make sure that that transitions to a peaceful democracy.  That’s why we’re taking care of those veterans when they come home because that is a sacred obligation that we have.  (Applause.) 

So here is the point, Chicago.  We have faced an extraordinary array of challenges at home and around the world.  But we wouldn’t have made any of this progress if it hadn’t been for you.  I was talking to a group earlier and I said, you know, I grew up here in Chicago.  I wasn’t born here.  (Laughter.)  Just want to be clear.  I was born in Hawaii.  (Applause.)  But I became a man here in Chicago.  (Applause.)  And a lot of the people who are here today -- the values, the ideals, my beliefs, my core convictions about what makes America great were forged here. 

Because it’s here in this incredibly diverse city, that people from every background, every creed, every color, from farm towns and inner-city neighborhoods that somehow come together, immigrants from all around the world, it is here that I was reminded about why America is so great.

It’s not the size of our skyscrapers.  It’s not the size of our GDP.  It’s the fact that we’re able to keep two ideas together at the same time:  One, that we’re all individuals with -- endowed with certain inalienable rights and liberties; and we’re self-reliant; and we’re entrepreneurs; and we don't want folks telling us what to do.  That’s part of -- being an individual is so important to us.  But we also have this idea that we’re all in this together; that we look out for one another; that I am my brother’s keeper, I am my sister’s keeper; that I want to make sure that child on the South Side or the West Side or out in Maywood or out in Dolton, that they’ve got the same opportunities that I’ve had.  (Applause.)  And that I’m looking after them, not out of charity, but because my life is richer, my life is better when the people around me are happy and the people around me have a shot at the American Dream. 

And those values that all of you helped to form in me, I carried those with me to the White House.  I wake up every day with them and I go to bed every night with them.  I’m thinking about you. 

And when I read those letters every night, from constituents all across the country, and they talk about what it’s like to send out 16 resumes and not get an answer back; and the desperation that a parent feels thinking they might not be able to take care of their kids; or a child writing a letter saying their parents are losing their home and they’re going to have to move, and, Mr. President, is there something that you can do -- when I’m thinking about those things, I’m also thinking back here, thinking back home, about what you’ve taught me. 

See, that campaign in 2008, it wasn’t my campaign, it was your campaign.  It was about your best instincts, your best impulses, your vision for an America that is more fair and more just and more equal, and has opportunity for everybody -- (applause) -- regardless of color, regardless of race, regardless of creed, regardless of religion, regardless of sexual orientation.  (Applause.) 

If you hadn’t knocked on all those doors, if you hadn’t called up all your friends back in 2008, I wouldn’t be here.  But you know what, we didn’t come here tonight just to go down Memory Lane.  We didn’t come here tonight just to pat ourselves on the back.  We came here tonight because we know that for all the progress we’ve made we’ve still got business to do.  We are not finished.  (Applause.)  And the only way we’re going to finish is the same way we began this journey, and that is together. 

We’re going to have to keep on -- we’re going to have to keep on working.  (Applause.)  Together, we’ve got to make sure any American who is looking for work can find a job that pays the bills.  (Applause.)  Together, we’ve got to make sure that hardworking families that are doing everything right aren’t falling behind, but getting ahead.  We’ve got to reclaim the American Dream for all Americans. 

That’s the change we still believe in.  That’s what I think about every single day.  That’s our North Star.  That’s our destination.  And we’re not there yet.  With your help we can keep American on track, though. 

With your help we will attract new jobs and new businesses to our shores.  We will make sure American isn’t just competing, but we’re competing to win in this economy.  With your help we’re going to make sure all our kids are ready for college, all our kids are ready for careers.  Because a world-class education is the single most important factor in whether America succeeds in the 21st century.  (Applause.) 

With your help, we can rebuild our crumbling infrastructure -- not just our roads and our bridges, but our high-speed rail lines and our communications networks.  (Applause.)  With your help, we can continue to invest in cutting-edge medical research and breakthrough technologies, and finally have an energy policy that makes sure that our entire economy isn’t subject to $4 or $5 gallon gas -- (applause) -- and reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and clean up the planet in the process, so we can bequeath to our children and our grandchildren the kind of planet that we inherited.  (Applause.)  With your help, we can out-educate and out-innovate and out-compete the rest of the world.  (Applause.) 

And we can only do all this, by the way, if we get our fiscal issues under control.  I gave a speech about this yesterday.  (Applause.)  When I was running for President, I talked about a new era of responsibility in this country.  And part of that means restoring some common sense about our federal finances, restoring fiscal discipline in Washington, living within our means. 

Last week we were able to prevent a government shutdown.  And the reason we were able to do it was because we agreed to spending cuts, but we insisted on protecting investments in things like education and medical research.  (Applause.)  But now we’ve got to reign in this long-term deficit and deal with this long-term debt because it threatens our financial stability.  We won’t be able to do all those good things if we don't get our fiscal house in order. 

But if we don't deal with these issues, all the issues we care about we’re not going to be able to solve.  Educating our kids; caring for our sick; looking after our seniors and our poor -- all of that will be threatened.  So yesterday I tried to lay out a vision for how we tackle this problem.  We need to build on the compromises we made last week, but we can’t compromise on our investments to grow, the investments we need to create jobs.  (Applause.)

We’ve got to reform defense spending.  We’ve got to reform health care spending.  (Applause.)  But we’re not going to sacrifice our fundamental commitment that we made to one another through Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security, the safety net for our people.  (Applause.)

And we need to bring some balance to our tax code.  Back in December I agreed to extend the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans as much as I disliked it because it was the only way to prevent a tax hike on the middle class.  But the fact is we can’t afford $1 trillion of tax cuts for folks like me.  Not now -- not now, now when so many other Americans are struggling; not when our deficits are so high.

I think Americans like Michelle and me, we’ve been blessed. This country has given so much to us.  We can afford to do a little bit more to make sure that every child in this country has opportunity and every senior is looked after.  (Applause.)  I think that's something that we can do. 

That's our vision for America.  We’ve got a big vision for America, of a compassionate America and a caring America and an ambitious America, not a small America.  (Applause.)  It’s a vision where we’re living within our means but we’re still investing in our future.  Where everyone makes sacrifices; no one bears all the burden.  Where we live up to the idea that no matter who we are or what we look like, no matter whether our ancestors landed on Ellis Island or came here on slave ships or across the Rio Grande, we are connected to one another.  That I am my brother’s keeper, I am my sister’s keeper.  In this country, we rise and fall together.  (Applause.) 

That’s the idea at the heart of America.  That’s why we’re going to keep on fighting for immigration reform -- (applause) -- because we can’t have a nation that forgets its immigrant roots. We can have a nation that is a nation of laws but also a nation of immigrants. 

This idea of bringing everyone together and making sure that everybody is contributing, everybody is responsible, but everybody also looks out for one another -- that’s the idea at the heart of our last campaign.  That’s the idea at the heart of this campaign.  That’s the idea at the heart of America. 

This is not my campaign.  This is your campaign.  (Applause.)  And I’ve got to tell you, there’s going to come a time when I’ll fully engage in this race.  When the time comes, I will be campaigning.  (Laughter.)  I’ll be ready to go.  But I’ve got to tell you, right now, I still have this day job -- (laughter) --

AUDIENCE:  You're the big time.  (Applause.) 

THE PRESIDENT:  And that’s why I’m going to need your your help now more than ever.  This campaign is still in its early stages, but now is the time when you can help shape it to make sure it gets out of the gate strong. 

Let me tell you, I’m grayer and I’m a little dinged up.  (Laughter.)  I know there are times where some of you have felt frustrated because we’ve had to compromise with the Republicans on some issues.  There have been times people are frustrated because we didn’t get everything done in the first two years.  There have been times where I felt the same way you do.  But you know what, we knew this would not be easy. 

We knew that on a journey like this there are going to be setbacks, there are going to be detours, there are going to be times where you stumble.  But we also knew something else.  We knew that at each and every juncture in our history, when our future was on the line, when we were at a crossroads like we are now, the country came together.  We were able to make the changes that we needed. 

That’s what earlier generations did -- in Lexington, in Concord, in Salem, in Stonewall.  That’s what so many of you did out in cornfields in Iowa; polling places in Wrigleyville.  And that’s what I need each and every one of you to remember, and do one more time -- not for me, but for us.  (Applause.)  For the future we hold in common.  (Applause.)  For the better days that lie ahead.  (Applause.)  

So whenever you hear people say our problems are too big to solve or we can’t bring about the changes we seek, I want you to think about all the progress we’ve already made.  I think -- I want you to think about all the unfinished business that lies ahead.  I want you to be excited about the future that lies before us.  And I want to remind you, and I want you to remind everybody else, of those simple words that summed up what we believe as a people:  Yes, we can.  (Applause.) 

Thank you.  (Applause.)

END
9:47 P.M. CDT 

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a DNC Event

MK Restaurant
Chicago, Illinois

7:46 P.M. CDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, everybody.  (Applause.)  Thank you so much.  Everybody, have a seat.  Have a seat.  These are a bunch of old friends, we can relax.  It is wonderful to be home.  And I want to thank the whole crew at MK for doing just a great job.  And I know everybody had a fabulous meal.

I was reminding folks that Michelle and I used to come here for dates.  (Laughter.)  But now we have all these reporters come with us on dates, so it’s become a little rare.

But it’s wonderful to see all of you.  As I look around the room I see people who I've known for years, who supported me when nobody could pronounce my name.  And so all of you are extraordinarily special.  And I'm going to have a chance to travel around the room and say thank you to each of you.

There are a couple people obviously I want to acknowledge.  First of all, I'm not sure if her husband is here yet, but that doesn’t matter because she is -- she’s one of my favorite people -- Maggie Daley is in the house.  (Applause.)  So we are thrilled to have her here.  Thank you.  Your brother-in-law is doing okay. (Laughter.)       

Speaking of chiefs of staff, I am incredibly fortunate to not only have somebody now who is doing an unbelievable job and has been able to slip into what I consider to be the toughest job in Washington without missing a beat -- and that's Bill Daley -- but I've also benefited from a great chief of staff when I first got there, and he’s got the best job in the world now, which is the mayor-elect, which means he doesn’t actually have to do anything yet.  (Laughter.)  But we love him -- Rahm Emanuel.  (Applause.) 

And finally, somebody who is making really tough choices each and every day but is guided in making those choices by great values and a knowledge and memory of where he came from and always wanting to make sure that everybody has opportunity -- and that’s our governor, Pat Quinn.  So thrilled to have Patrick.  (Applause.) 

So I want to spend most of this time in a conversation and answering questions, and then I want to spend the rest of the time roaming around the room and kissing and hugging everybody. 

But we’ve obviously gone through an extraordinary two and a half years.  And when Penny agreed to chair my finance committee back in 2007, part of the reason she did it is just she likes me and Michelle.  But part of it was I think a shared recognition that the country was at a crossroads.  We had enormous challenges and we had problems that we had been kicking down the road for years, and unless we acted decisively over the next four years, the next eight years, the next 10 years, that America’s greatness, its ability to respond to changing technologies, a changing economy, would be called into question.

And we weren’t sure whether we were going to be able to pull it off, but what we were absolutely certain about was there were certain core values that we cared deeply about and that we were going to fight for and try to give voice to:  The idea that we are a country of individualists and freedom-loving people, folks who are self-reliant and entrepreneurial and understand that we have to earn our way, but also a country that recognizes we’re in this together, and that those of us who are lucky enough to be successful want to see other people be successful; and that we want a country that is reflective of generosity and compassion; and that we want every kid to be able to be a governor or the head of a big company, regardless of where they were born, and we want a country that respects everyone, regardless of their race or their gender or their sexual orientation. 

And we want a country that is thinking about the future so that we are good stewards of the Earth.  And we are laying the foundation for economic success, not just now, but 20 years from now and 50 years from now -- and that what makes all this work is that we are committed to taking responsibility for ourselves, but also that we’re responsible for something larger than ourselves.

And that has to translate itself through our government in investments in education and investments in infrastructure and investments in science, and a willingness to make tough decisions about our budget, and willingness to make investments in environmental protection -- that all these things we do because  -- not out of charity, but because it makes our lives better to live in a country that is fair and just and provides an opportunity to everybody.

And so many of you became part of this campaign because you shared in those values.  And we didn’t fully appreciate, I think, how historic the recession would be and how precipitous some of these issues would come at us.  But we understood that we were going to have to do some big things. 

And over the last two and a half years, every day I’ve woken up remembering why we got into this thing, remembering the sacrifices and investments that all of you made not just in me but in this bigger idea of America.   And whether it was yanking this country out of the worst recession since the Great Depression or saving an auto industry that some people -- had been -- had written off, or making sure that our capital markets were working the way they were supposed to so that people could invest in businesses and buy homes and finance their kids to go to college; whether it was making sure that the student loan programs worked for everybody and that our kids weren’t loaded up with debt, or making sure that in a country as wealthy as ours everybody had some basic health insurance and wouldn’t be bankrupt, or families wouldn’t have to sell their homes because they’ve got a child with a preexisting condition; making certain that we got our troops out of Iraq and ended combat missions there, but also made sure that anybody who wanted to serve, regardless of who they loved, were able to serve; making sure that we got two more women on the United States Supreme Court and that one of them was Latina so that we could say that -- (applause) -- the institution was truly representative; making sure that we had equal pay for equal work; and making sure that we kept America secure.

And then they were pirates and pandemics and oil spills and -- but through all this, every single day what I was thinking about was how do we keep moving the country towards that vision that we collectively had:  A country that's more fair, more just, provides opportunity to all people.

I couldn’t be prouder of our accomplishments because of people like Rahm, because of people like Bill, because of all of you.  But we’ve got a lot more work to do.  There’s so much more to do. 

Every day I get letters from people all across the country, and over the last two and a half years, I can’t tell you how moving and heartbreaking and inspiring these letters are:  People who do everything right, work hard, look after their families and somehow have a spell of bad luck; or are sending out resume after resume but can’t find a job.  Kids writing, saying they think their parents are going to have to sell their home and wondering if there’s something I can do to help.  Families who have to drive 50 miles one way to get to their job and can’t afford to buy a new hybrid and so are stuck seeing huge chunks of their income consumed by rising gas prices. 

There’s so much that I want to do for these folks -- because of that vision that we started with.  We still have to have an energy policy that makes sure we’re not subject to the whims of what happens on the other side of the world.  We still have to have an immigration policy that’s reflective of the fact that we’re a nation of laws but also a nation of immigrants. 

And we’re going to have a major budget debate over the next six months.  We just passed this last year’s budget, but that was just the appetizer.  That was just the trial run.  Because what we now have -- and I spoke to this yesterday -- is a very stark choice.  Somebody asked, well, were you too tough on the Ryan plan yesterday?  I said, that wasn’t a critique; that was a description. 

And I don’t doubt the sincerity of those who are presenting this plan.  But understand what it means.  What it means is that our commitment to seniors fundamentally changes, and they’ll get a voucher, and if they can’t afford all the health insurance that -- or the price of health insurance on the open market, they’re going to have to make up the difference.  And if they can’t make up the difference, too bad.  We won’t have actually driven health care costs down.  We will have just transferred it onto the backs of seniors and families who have disabled children, and families that need help with their parents in the nursing home and can’t afford it. 

Under their vision, we can’t invest in roads and bridges and broadband and high-speed rail.  I mean, we would be a nation of potholes, and our airports would be worse than places that we thought -- that we used to call the Third World, but who are now investing in infrastructure. 

We would not be able to invest in basic research that helped to create the Internet and helped to create GPS, and is our main comparative advantage in this 21st century economy.  We couldn't afford to tell those kids on the West Side or the South Side, if you work hard, if you study hard, if you're hitting the books, that you're going to be able to afford to go to college.  We couldn't guarantee that.

And what I tried to emphasize yesterday was that's not necessary.  It’s not a vision that’s impelled by the numbers.  It’s a vision that is a choice because the notion is, is that somehow those of us who have been blessed by this country, that we're just looking out for ourselves, and we're not willing to make sure that that kid can go to college, and we're not willing to make sure that that senior is getting decent care in their golden age -- their golden years.

What is going to be valuable over the next six months and over the next 18 months is we are going to be able to present a very clear option to the American people:  We can get our fiscal house in order, but we can do it in a way that is consistent with our values and who we are as a people.  Or we can decide to shrink our vision of what America is. 

And I don't believe in shrinking America.  That's not who we are.  That's not what made America great.  I don't want a smaller America for Malia and Sasha, for your kids, for your grandkids.  I want a big, generous, energized, optimistic country.

That's what we're fighting for.  Now, over the next six months, I have this day job that I've got to take care of.  And so the main thing I want to emphasize tonight is remember that this is not my vision, this is your vision.  This is what you fought for.  This is why you invested in this campaign -- not just with your money, but with your time and your energy, with your hopes.  I need you to take that same kind of ownership over the next six months.

You know, your candidate is a little grayer now.  Some of the excitement of something entirely new is not going to be there, and I've got some dents and dings in the fender.  But that vision hasn’t changed.  What we care about hasn’t changed.  Our commitments should not have changed.

And so this campaign is not my campaign; this is your campaign.  And the question is do we finish the job.  I’m prepared to finish the job.  I hope you are, too. 

Thanks.  (Applause.)

END
7:56 P.M. CDT 

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a DNC Event

N9NE Restaurant
Chicago, Illinois

6:12 P.M. CDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Hey!  Hey!  Hello, hello, hello!  Hello!  Hello, Chicago!  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Thank you.  Thank you, everybody.  It’s good to be home.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Thank you.  All right, everybody have a seat.  Everybody have a seat.  You’re making me blush.  (Laughter.) 

We’ve got some very special guests here today.  First of all, my former seatmate in the Illinois state senate who is doing gangbuster work all over the state -- Attorney General Lisa Madigan is in the house.  Where is Lisa?  Where is she?  There she is.  (Applause.) 

A guy who I basically follow around to see what he eats and drinks so I can look like him, somebody who never ages, always doing the right thing on behalf of communities all across the state, especially here in Chicago -- Secretary of State Jesse White is in the house.  (Applause.) 

Our newly elected Cook County President, one of my earliest supporters, and also my former alderwoman -- so I hope that my garbage is still being picked up -- Toni Preckwinkle is in the house.  (Applause.)  She’s around here somewhere.

And then I have to admit that I got a little confused.  (Laughter.)  I walk in and there are these two guys talking, both of them very animated, both of them a little intimidating, even though they’re not tall in statute.  (Laughter.)  I was trying to figure out who I should bow to first.  I decided to go with the current mayor -- (laughter and applause) -- somebody who has done more to make Chicago not just a great American city but a great world city, and his legacy is going to be deep and lasting, as deep and lasting as his father’s was.  We are grateful for his service -- the mayor of the city of Chicago, Richard Daley.  (Applause.) 

Bill is doing okay, Rich.  (Laughter.)  I mean, you know, there are times where he’s still kind of figuring out where everything is -- (laughter) -- but overall he’s making the grade. Of course, he had some big shoes to fill.  And I could not be prouder of the job this man did on behalf of America as my chief of staff. 

As Bill knows, there probably is not a harder job in government than being chief of staff.  You get all the blame and little of the credit, and the pressures are enormous and they are constant.  And I rely extraordinarily heavily, given everything that’s on our plate, on the person who essentially oversees the executive functions of the White House. 

And so I am blessed now to have a great chief of staff, but I also am so lucky to have had in some of the toughest times that we’ve seen since the Great Depression somebody who is not only a great manager, a great strategist, a great political thinker, but also my friend.  Yes, he is foul-mouthed.  (Laughter.)  Yes, that finger thing is a little creepy.  (Laughter.)  But I love him anyway, and, Chicago, you did the right thing by electing him the next mayor of the city of Chicago -- Rahm Emanuel.  (Applause.)

Where did Rahm go?  He’s in the back somewhere.  He’s cutting a deal of some sort.  (Laughter.) 

Look, I don't want to make a long speech, mainly just because even though I'm not supposed to do it, I just want to go around and say hello to everybody -- (applause) -- because as I look around the room, I've got as good a collection of friends from every stage of my life in this room as anybody could hope for. 

I've got people who helped me get started as a lawyer.  I've got folks who helped me get started in politics.  I've got folks who worked with me down in Springfield.  I've got people who were some of my earliest supporters in my congressional race -- (applause) -- and nursed me back to health after a beating.  (Laughter.)  I've got folks who believed that I might be a United States senator when nobody could pronounce my name, long before I made a speech in Boston.  And then I've got people that had the faith that I could perform the functions of the highest office in the land.  (Applause.) 

I've got some folks who taught with me at the University of Chicago.  (Applause.)  I've got some Hyde-Parkers in the house.  (Applause.)  I've got some folks who were there the summer I met my wife and folks who were there when my children were born.  So as I look across the room it’s a record of my adult life and the people who helped me to become the man I am.

The last two and a half years have obviously been extraordinary.  We understood when we put together our presidential campaign that the country was entering a crossroads, that we were going to have to make some fundamental decisions about who we were and who we are as a people.  And I got into this race for President because I believed that what makes us great is our incredible commitment to individual freedom and individual responsibility; the fact that with some pluck and some hard work and some good fortune, here in America anybody can make it, regardless of race or creed or station. 

But what made us great is also the fact that this collection of people from all around the world are somehow able to come together and pledge allegiance not just to a flag but to a creed; that we’re able to join together in this common enterprise; that we’re able to look out for one another; that when we make it, we’re saying to ourselves, who else can we pull up the ladder; that there’s a sense of community that is not defined simply by ethnicity or where we go to church or mosque or synagogue or temple, but a commitment to each other that somehow is greater than the sum of its parts.

That's why I decided to run for President.  That's why you supported me.  Those are the values that you helped teach me when I first came to Chicago so many years ago.  And those values have been put to the test over the last two and a half years, because Americans have gone through a tough time. 

I can’t describe night after night reading the letters that I get, the emails that I get, from people all across the country -- just heartbreaking stories:  Children talking about their parents losing their jobs or losing their homes and wondering if they're going to be okay; folks sending out job application after job application after job application and nothing coming back.; parents of young men and women who’ve been killed in action, trying to describe how proud they are of those kids even though their heart just aches, and asking to make sure that as the Commander-in-Chief that I am living up to that full measure of devotion that they displayed. 

And so for the last two and a half years, what I’ve tried to do is to make sure that every day when I wake up, I remember why I ran and I remember why you supported me.  And whether it was passing a Recovery Act that would get the economy back on its feet and put people back to work; saving an auto industry that a lot of people had written off; making sure that we had a financial system that is functioning but also one that was sufficiently regulated, that consumers got a fair shake; making sure that we brought combat in Iraq to a close; making sure that anybody can serve in our military regardless of their sexual orientation -- (applause) -- making sure that in a country as wealthy as ours nobody is going bankrupt because they get sick, and no parent has to worry about selling their house because their child has a preexisting condition and he can’t get health insurance -- (applause) -- making sure that we got more women on the Supreme Court and that one of them is a Latina -- (applause) -- and making sure that women get equal pay for equal work so that my daughters when they come up -- (applause) -- are going to have the same chances as your sons. 

Each and every time we’ve had to make a decision, my guiding principle, that North Star, has been those values that we talked about during the campaign:  I am my brother’s keeper, I am my sister’s keeper.  A belief in an America that is competitive and compassionate.  A belief that there’s nothing we can’t accomplish if we come together, and that we have to think big in terms of what we need to accomplish. 

And we’ve made extraordinary progress, but we still have so much work to do.  There’s still too many people out there writing me letters that don’t have a job; too many folks who are worried about losing their home.  There’s still too many kids trapped in poverty in cities and rural areas all across America that we haven’t been able to reach.  There’s still discrimination out there.  There’s still unfairness and injustice out there. 

We’ve still got 100,000 troops in Afghanistan -- who are remarkable and doing everything they can to keep us safe.  We still have roads that need to be fixed and bridges that need to be repaired.  We still need an energy policy that doesn’t make us vulnerable to whatever spikes in the world oil market might occur. 

Right now, there are folks in the Chicago-land area who are every day trying to figure out how am I going to fill up my gas tank.  And all the tax cuts that we provided to help working-class and middle-class families, they’re worried about those tax breaks being entirely eaten up by $4.00 a gallon gas. 

We still have to worry about making sure that as the world’s largest economy, as the world’s wealthiest nation, that we’re taking the lead when it comes to climate change.  (Applause.)   We still have an obligation to make sure that we have an immigration policy in this country that matches up with our values as a nation of laws, but also a nation of immigrants.  (Applause.)  There are still small businesses out there just waiting to be started if they’re getting the right financing.  There are still young men and women who are just ready to seize the moment as engineers and scientists if we’re just making sure those research grants are flowing.  And we got to do all this in a context, as I talked about yesterday, in which our fiscal challenges are real. 

The speech I gave yesterday was not a partisan shot at the other side.  It was an attempt to clarify the choice that we have as a country right now.  (Applause.)  We agree, Democrats and Republicans, that we’ve got to come together and have a government that lives within its means, that is lean, is smart, is effective; that we’ve got a country that pays its bills and isn’t borrowing 30 or 40 cents for every dollar that we spend.  That is imperative. 

And if we’re progressive, we’ve got to care about the deficit just as much as the other side does, because we won’t be able to fund the research that's necessary, or the Head Start programs, or the college loan programs, or the infrastructure that we need, unless it’s on a firm, solid footing.

But how we get there is important.  And you’ve got right now one side that I believe is entirely sincere that says we no longer can afford to do big things in this country.  We can't afford to be compassionate. 

We can't afford Medicare so let’s make sure that seniors get a voucher, and if the health insurance companies aren’t giving them full coverage or they can’t afford coverage with the voucher they get, tough luck, they're on their own.

It’s a vision that says we can’t afford to rebuild our roads and our bridges.  We can’t afford high-speed rail.  We can’t afford broadband lines into rural areas so that everybody can be a part of this new global community.  We can’t afford to make sure the poor kid can go to college.  We can’t afford health care for another 50 million people.  That’s the choice they pose.

Now, understand, it is a choice.  Because they’re absolutely right -- if people like me, if most of the people in this room, can’t afford to pay a little bit more in taxes, then a lot of this stuff we can’t afford.  If we’re insisting that those of us who are doing best in this society have no obligations to other folks, then, no, we can’t afford it.

But if we’re willing to go back to our deepest roots and say to ourselves, you know what, that’s not how America was built, that’s not how we became the greatest nation on Earth, that’s not what the American way is all about; if we say to ourselves I do have that commitment to that child on the South Side or on the West Side or out in the south suburbs, for them to succeed, too  -- my life will be better if they succeed -- this is not charity, this is a good investment for me because I want to live in a society where all those kids have a shot; if we say to ourselves, you know what, I want people to have health care, I don’t want them going into the emergency room and sitting and waiting, and then getting the most expensive care; I think it makes sense for us to have a more effective health care system and one where everybody has basic coverage; if we’re saying to ourselves, I want to make sure that Malia and Sasha and your children and your grandchildren, that they’re inheriting a land that has clean rivers and air you can breathe and that's worth something to me, that's something I want to invest in because when I’m all finished here and I’m looking back on my life, I want to be able to say, we were good stewards of the planet --(applause) -- if that's what we believe, then we’ve got the ability to do that.  We’ve got the ability to do it, and it doesn’t take that much.  It just doesn’t take that much.

If we apply some practical common sense to this, we can solve our fiscal challenges and still have the America that we believe in.  That's what this budget debate is going to be about. And that's what the 2012 campaign is going to be about. 

And so over the next three months, six months, nine months, I’m going to be a little preoccupied.  (Laughter.)  I’ve got this day job that -- (laughter) -- that I’ve got to handle.  And it means that I’m not going to see all of you as often I’d like.  It means that I’m not going to be able to make that phone call to you and thank you even though my gratitude is profound.

It means that all of you are going to have to remember why I’m standing here, why we were successful -- because it wasn’t my campaign; it was your campaign.  It was your investment.  It was your time.  It was your energy.  It was your faith and it was your confidence that is allowing me to try to live up to those values that we share.

And if you remember that, and if you take ownership for that, and if you are just as fired up now -- despite the fact that your candidate is a little older and a lot grayer -- (laughter and applause) -- then I have every confidence that we are going to be able finish the job.

Thank you, Chicago.  I love you.  (Applause.)

END
6:35 P.M. CDT

The White House

Office of the First Lady

Remarks by the First Lady and Dr. Biden at Joining Forces with USO and Sesame Street event

Veterans Memorial Auditorium
Columbus, Ohio

6:32 P.M. EDT
 
DR. BIDEN:  Thank you, Elmo and Katie.  And thank you to the USO, Sesame Street, and Nick Jonas for supporting Joining Forces.  Weren’t they terrific?  (Applause.)
 
It’s so great to be here in Columbus tonight.  I can see a lot of children in the audience.  Can you raise your hand if you’re part of a military family?  Can we have a big round of applause for all our military kids?  (Applause.)  Thank you, kids, for all that you do.  I know just how proud you are of your moms and dad in uniform.
 
But we are all so proud of you.  I’m especially pleased to be here today as the mother of an Army National Guardsman.  (Applause.)
 
I want to thank General McKinley and his wife, Cheryl, and all the other adjutants general for your work on behalf of the National Guard families.  (Applause.)
 
And I want to say a big welcome home to the Marines of the Lima Company.  You make us so proud!  (Applause.)
 
Michelle and I came here today to say thank you to all you servicemembers and your families, and we hope to inspire more communities out around the country to reach out to our military families just like we are doing tonight.  We can all join forces.
 
And now I want to introduce my partner in this effort and my good friend, our First Lady Michelle Obama.  (Applause.)
 
MRS. OBAMA:  Wow!  Thank you so much.  (Applause.)  And thank you to Jill Biden, my partner and my friend.  Let’s give Jill a round of applause.  (Applause.)
 
Like Jill, I am thrilled to be here in Columbus with all of you.  And I want to recognize your mayor, Mayor Michael Coleman, who’s here tonight.  Yay, Mayor Coleman!  (Applause.)
 
I also want to thank -- and this is important -- the Franklin County Veterans Memorial Theater -- (applause) -- because you know what, they donated this space for this event tonight.  So let’s give them a round of applause.  (Applause.)
 
And we couldn’t do this night without the USO and Sesame Street and of course our dear, dear friend, Nick Jonas.  Again, let’s give them another big hand.  (Applause.)
 
And I also want to thank all of you, those military kids and your moms and your dads that are in the audience.  You all are a guest of honor this evening.  We did all of this for you.  You’re the reason that we’re here.  And I think that, again, we have to give you guys another big round of applause.  (Applause.)
 
And finally I also want to thank all of the community members that are here tonight.  There are a lot of community members who came out tonight because even though you may not be part of a military family yourself, you still feel a whole lot of gratitude and respect for those who are.  I know you do. 
 
And that's why Jill and I have launched Joining Forces.  We launched it Tuesday.  This is our nationwide campaign to recognize, honor and support America’s military families.  We want to give back to these families that have given all of us so much.  So we’re going to join forces across the federal government.
 
We’re joining forces with businesses like Sears and Kmart.  We’re joining forces with organizations like the PTA and the YMCA.  (Applause.) 
 
But most importantly, this effort is about all of us joining forces as Americans, as neighbors, and colleagues, and classmates.  And the motto for this effort is very simple.  Jill and I believe that everyone -- everyone -- can do something, even boys and girls.  Everyone can do something to support a military family.  And everyone can ask themselves, what can I do?  How can I give back? 
 
If you’re a kid, you can ask your teacher if your class can do a project to support military families.  If you’re a parent, maybe you can tell that military mom down the street that you’ll take her shift in the carpool, or maybe mow the lawn, or start a group at your place of worship to help lighten the load for these families during deployments.
 
And when you get home, I want you all to log on to joiningforces.gov and see how you can get involved.
 
In the end, I know that if we all work together, if we all join forces, then we can serve our military families as well as they’ve served us.
 
Thank you all so much.  We are so proud of you.  We love you.  We’re going to come down and shake some hands.  (Applause.)
 
END
6:37 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the First Lady

Remarks by the First Lady and Dr. Biden at Joining Forces Employment Event

Sears Distribution Center
Columbus, Ohio

4:47 P.M. EDT
 
DR. BIDEN:  Hi.  Good afternoon, everyone.  And thank you, Christina, for that kind introduction.  And thank you for your service.
           
My name is Jill Biden, and I’m a proud military mom.  It’s great to be here today and to see so many service members, military families, and veterans.  Thank you all for your service and your sacrifice to this country.  I’m also pleased to see representatives from local businesses and community organizations here today who are doing their part to honor and recognize service members and their families.
  
Over the past two years, Michelle and I have had the privilege of traveling around the country and around the world, visiting with service members and military families and hearing their stories firsthand.  Most of them talk about how proud they are to serve our country. 
 
But there are also challenges that come along with this service.  Frequent moves can be difficult for children who have to switch schools and for spouses who are pursuing an education or trying to get ahead in a career.
 
Last year, I met Alicia, an amazing young nurse -- student nurse from North Carolina.  She managed to finish her nursing degree while caring for her critically-injured husband at -- excuse me -- Brooke Burn Center in Texas.  She triumphed, despite unimaginable circumstances, moving across the country, caring for her husband and completing her degree.
 
As her story demonstrates, our military families are strong.  They are incredibly resilient.  And they are some of the most valuable members of our American workplace.
 
Part of what Michelle and I are doing with “Joining Forces,” is showing Americans how organizations and businesses like the groups here today are reaching out and doing their part.  That’s why we’re here today.
 
Michelle and I have talked a lot about the ways that all Americans can support our troops and thank these men and women for their service.  And all of you are using the workplace to do just that. 
 
I’ve seen, through my work with a grassroots organization in Delaware, that small community groups can make a huge difference.  There are many small and effective groups like this all over the country, from the barbecue master who travels through your state of Ohio to cook for military families, to the accountants providing free tax service, which is timely, to the soldiers in Minnesota collecting hockey equipment for military kids.
 
The organizations here today who are supporting our troops and families are showing all Americans that there are countless ways to help -- some large and many small, but all important, and I can tell you from personal experience, all appreciated. 
 
We can all join forces.  You are doing your part.  The government is doing its part.  And each American has the ability to make a difference in the life of a military family.  That’s what this initiative is all about.
 
It is now my pleasure to introduce my partner and dear friend, a woman we are fortunate enough to call our First Lady, Michelle Obama.  (Applause.)  
 
MRS. OBAMA:  Thank you everyone.  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Thank you all so much.  Thank you, please.  First of all, let me thank Jill, not just for that very kind introduction, but for being such a tremendous partner in this effort.  This has been something that Jill and I have worked on together for years.  She brings a wealth of expertise as a Blue Star mom.  And her passion and focus on this issue has really helped get this thing off the ground.  So let’s give her another big round of applause.  (Applause.)
 
I also want to thank Secretary Solis and Lou D’Ambrosio for joining us today and for their work and commitment on this issue as well.  And most of all, I want to thank Christina Dibble and all of the other Sears associates here today who have served our country as veterans or as military spouses.  (Applause.) 
 
As Jill mentioned, for the past two years, we have traveled across America and in other parts of the world, meeting with our men and women in uniform, our veterans, and their families.  So we know all about your courage and your patriotism.  We have seen it firsthand.
 
We know about the sacrifices that you have made for our country.  And we know about the challenges that you face every single day.
 
And we’ve met so many military spouses who do so much, who work one fulltime job during the day and then they come home to start that second fulltime job of running a household and raising kids, and doing it all alone while a spouse is deployed.  We see them trying to build seniority at their jobs, but seeing that they have to keep starting over every time that they move to a new duty station.  And with each new move comes a whole new job search.  And that’s not easy, particularly when so many employers see a resume with multiple jobs as a red flag rather than as a reality of military life.
 
The truth is that many employers today simply aren’t aware of all that our veterans and military spouses have to offer.  They don’t realize that members of our military do some amazing things.  They master some of the most advanced technologies.  They run some of the most complex operations.  They have extensive experience managing hundreds of their colleagues.
 
And as for their spouses, as Christina said, on average, they have higher high school graduation rates than the general population.  And more than 80 percent of spouses have some college education as well.
 
And then, there are all the skills and experiences that come with being a military spouse and managing that lifestyle, qualifications that you won’t necessarily learn at school or at a university -- the ability to work well with all kinds of people all over the place; the ability to multitask, because you cannot do this if you cannot multitask and think outside of the box; the ability to weather adversity and adapt to changing circumstances.
 
See, Jill and I can tell, from first-hand experience, that our veterans and military spouses are some of the hardest-working, most talented people that we know.  And we think that it’s time that our country finally tapped into their full potential and took advantage of all these folks have to offer.
 
And that’s really why, this week, we’ve launched this wonderful, new campaign that we’re calling, “Joining Forces.”  So this is a nationwide effort to bring Americans together to recognize, to honor, and to serve our nation’s military families.
 
So we’re joining forces with everyone, with organizations like the PTA and the YMCA.  We’re urging them to reach out to our military kids and do more to support them. 
 
We’re joining forces with cities and states, and we’re encouraging them to adopt policies that help military families. 
 
We’re joining forces with the American people, more importantly, as neighbors and colleagues and classmates and community members, we’re urging people to step up and give something back to the military families who’ve given all of us so much.
 
And we’re joining forces with businesses all across the country.  We’re calling on them to recruit and hire veterans and military spouses.  We’re calling on them to make their workplaces more military-spouse friendly and more Guard and Reserve-family friendly, with things like flexible work schedules and portable jobs.
 
As Lou explained earlier, Sears has already stepped up to answer this call in such a brilliant way.  And they’re not alone.  Siemens is setting aside 10 percent of their open positions for veterans.  Technology leaders like AOL, Indeed.com and Cisco are creating new tools to connect military spouses and veterans with employers that are hiring.  Companies like Walmart and HP and Microsoft made a pledge to train military spouses in new technologies, so that they can start their own businesses.
 
As Secretary Solis said, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is encouraging its millions of members to hire military spouses and veterans, to find more mentors for military wives and women veterans.  And the Chamber is also going to host more than 100 job fairs across the country for these individuals.
 
And in the coming months, Jill and I, we’re going to be highlighting the best programs and initiatives that we can find at companies all across America.  This is a challenge.  Sears has set the bar.  Look at what we can do.  Can you do more?  And we’ll be calling on all companies, all companies in this country -- large and small -- to follow in their footsteps.  We’ll be urging companies to study these best practices and consider how they can incorporate them into their workplaces.  We’ll be urging them to get creative and come up with new ideas to help us benefit from all that our military spouses and veterans have to offer.

And I want to be clear that we’re not just doing this because it’s the right thing to do for America’s veterans and military families, although it is.  This is about doing the right thing.  But we’re also doing it because it’s the right thing to do for America’s businesses; because we know that when our companies hire the best people and then give them what they need to succeed, they see the results in their bottom lines.
 
And if enough companies do that -- if we can get enough companies to give our veterans and military spouses the chances they deserve to put their skills to work, that won’t just be good for those companies.  This is something that’s going to be good for our entire economy and for the future of this country.
 
So I want to end today by thanking all of you at Sears for everything you’ve done, for setting that bar, for showing other companies in the rest of the country what it means to have a workplace that values the service that you provide.  And I want to thank you for everything that you will continue to do in the months and the years ahead.  And we look forward to seeing companies across the country follow your lead.
 
So thank you so much.  Thank you for this event.  Thank you to all of you for your service.  May God bless.  Take care.
 
END
5:00 P.M. EDT