The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

FACT SHEET - White House Unveils America’s College Promise Proposal: Tuition-Free Community College for Responsible Students

Nearly a century ago, a movement that made high school widely available helped lead to rapid growth in the education and skills training of Americans, driving decades of economic growth and prosperity. America thrived in the 20th century in large part because we had the most educated workforce in the world.  But other nations have matched or exceeded the secret to our success. Today, more than ever, Americans need more knowledge and skills to meet the demands of a growing global economy without having to take on decades of debt before they even embark on their career. 

Today the President is unveiling the America’s College Promise proposal to make two years of community college free for responsible students, letting students earn the first half of a bachelor’s degree and earn skills needed in the workforce at no cost. This proposal will require everyone to do their part: community colleges must strengthen their programs and increase the number of students who graduate, states must invest more in higher education and training, and students must take responsibility for their education, earn good grades, and stay on track to graduate. The program would be undertaken in partnership with states and is inspired by new programs in Tennessee and Chicago. If all states participate, an estimated 9 million students could benefit. A full-time community college student could save an average of $3,800 in tuition per year. 

In addition, today the President will propose a new American Technical Training Fund to expand innovative, high-quality technical training programs similar to Tennessee Tech Centers that meet employer needs and help prepare more Americans for better paying jobs. These proposals build on a number of historic investments the President has made in college affordability and quality since taking office, including a $1,000 increase in the maximum Pell Grant award to help working and middle class families, the creation of the $2,500 American Opportunity Tax Credit, reforming student loans to eliminate subsidies to banks to invest in making college more affordable and keeping student debt manageable, and making available over $2 billion in grants to connect community colleges with employers to develop programs that are designed to get hard-working students good jobs.

The President’s Plan: Make Two Years of College as Free and Universal as High School

By 2020, an estimated 35 percent of job openings will require at least a bachelor’s degree and 30 percent will require some college or an associate’s degree. Forty percent of college students are enrolled at one of America’s more than 1,100 community colleges, which offer students affordable tuition, open admission policies, and convenient locations.  They are particularly important for students who are older, working, need remedial classes, or can only take classes part-time. For many students, they offer academic programs and an affordable route to a four-year college degree. They are also uniquely positioned to partner with employers to create tailored training programs to meet economic needs within their communities such as nursing, health information technology, and advanced manufacturing.

The America’s College Promise proposal would create a new partnership with states to help them waive tuition in high-quality programs for responsible students, while promoting key reforms to help more students complete at least two years of college. Restructuring the community college experience, coupled with free tuition, can lead to gains in student enrollment, persistence, and completion transfer, and employment. Specifically, here is what the initiative will mean:

Enhancing Student Responsibility and Cutting the Cost of College for All Americans: Students who attend at least half-time, maintain a 2.5 GPA while in college, and make steady progress toward completing their program will have their tuition eliminated. These students will be able to earn half of the academic credit they need for a four-year degree or earn a certificate or two-year degree to prepare them for a good job.

Building High-Quality Community Colleges: Community colleges will be expected to offer programs that either (1) are academic programs that fully transfer to local public four-year colleges and universities, giving students a chance to earn half of the credit they need for a four-year degree, or (2) are occupational training programs with high graduation rates and that lead to degrees and certificates that are in demand among employers.  Other types of programs will not be eligible for free tuition.  Colleges must also adopt promising and evidence-based institutional reforms to improve student outcomes, such as the effective Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) programs at the City University of New York which waive tuition, help students pay for books and transit costs, and provide academic advising and supportive scheduling programs to better meet the needs of participating students, resulting in greater gains in college persistence and degree completion.

Ensuring Shared Responsibility with States: Federal funding will cover three-quarters of the average cost of community college. States that choose to participate will be expected to contribute the remaining funds necessary to eliminate community college tuition for eligible students. States that already invest more and charge students less can make smaller contributions, though all participating states will be required to put up some matching funds. States must also commit to continue existing investments in higher education; coordinate high schools, community colleges, and four-year institutions to reduce the need for remediation and repeated courses; and allocate a significant portion of funding based on performance, not enrollment alone. States will have flexibility to use some resources to expand quality community college offerings, improve affordability at four-year public universities, and improve college readiness, through outreach and early intervention.

Expanding Technical Training for Middle Class Jobs. Additionally, in order to spread the availability of high-quality and innovative programs like those in Tennessee and Texas, which achieve better than average completion and employment outcomes, the President is also proposing the American Technical Training Fund. This fund will award programs that have strong employer partnerships and include work-based learning opportunities, provide accelerated training, and are scheduled to accommodate part-time work. Programs could be created within current community colleges or other training institutions. The focus of the discretionary budget proposal would be to help high-potential, low-wage workers gain the skills to work into growing fields with significant numbers of middle-class jobs that local employers are trying to fill such as energy, IT, and advanced manufacturing. This program will fund the start-up of 100 centers and scale those efforts in succeeding years. Smaller grants would help to bring together partners and start a pilot program. Larger grants would be used for expanding programs based on evidence of effectiveness, which could include past performance on graduation rates, job placement rates and placement wages. Building on the President’s community college initiative, known as the Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training Grants and for which 2014 was the final year of funding, these funds will help community colleges become more job-driven.

Building on State and Local Programs.  In the past year, Tennessee and the City of Chicago initiated free community college programs.  In the first year of the Tennessee program, 57,000 students representing almost 90 percent of the state’s high school graduating class applied for the program. The scholarship is coupled with college counseling, mentorship, and community service that early evidence suggests supports greater enrollment, persistence and college completion.  This is coupled with efforts to spur innovation and improvement by funding colleges using performance outcomes based on student success and an innovative approach to career and technical education through the Tennessee Colleges of Applied Technology.  These Tennessee Tech Centers have a graduation rate of 80 percent and a job placement rate of 85 percent.

Building on a Record of Progress. Since taking office, President Obama has taken steps to expand federal support to help more students afford college, while calling for a shared responsibility in tackling rising college costs. Key achievements include:

  • Doubling the Investment in Pell Grants: The President has raised the maximum Pell Grant award to $5,730 for the 2014-15 award year — a nearly $1,000 increase since 2008. The number of Pell Grant recipients has expanded by 50 percent over that same time.
  • Expanding Education Tax Credits: President Obama established the American Opportunity Tax Credit in 2009 to assist families with the costs of college, providing up to $10,000 for four years of college tuition.
  • Pay-As-You-Earn Loans: All new borrowers can now cap loan payments at 10 percent of their incomes. The Department of Education has begun the process to amend its regulations and will make the new plan available on all direct loans by December 2015. We expect it to benefit up to 5 million borrowers.
  • First in the World Grants: In September, the Department of Education awarded $75 million to 24 colleges and universities under the new First in the World grant program to expand college access and improve student learning while reducing costs.
  • College Ratings Program: The Department of Education continues to develop a college ratings system by the 2015-2015 school year that will recognize institutions that excel at enrolling students from all backgrounds; focus on maintaining affordability; and succeed at helping all students graduate with a degree or certificate of value.
  • Job-Driven Training Grants: Through the Trade Adjustment Community College and Career Training program more than 1,000 institutions have received $2 billion in federal funding to design education and training programs, working closely with employers and industry that prepare workers for jobs in-demand in their regional economies, such as health care, information technology and energy. These programs have shown early success -- through the end of FY2013, among the nearly 164,000 individuals who had enrolled in these programs 88 percent either completed a program or continued the program into a second year.
  • White House Summit on Community Colleges: In October 2010, the President convened community college leaders, faculty and students; business leaders; philanthropic organizations; and other workforce development experts for the first White House summit dedicated to the role that community colleges play in our efforts to increase the number of college graduates and prepare those graduates to lead the 21st century workforce. 
  • Center for the Analysis of Postsecondary Readiness: Last August, the Department of Education launched a new $10 million Institute for Education Sciences-funded Center for the Analysis of Postsecondary Readiness (CAPR) that is working to strengthen the research, evaluation, and support of college readiness efforts across the nation. CAPR is documenting current practices in developmental English and math education to identify innovative instructional practices that improve student success.
  • Call to Action on College Opportunity: Last December, the President, Vice President, and First Lady joined college presidents and leaders of non-profits, foundations, and other organizations to announce over 600 new commitments to produce more college graduates. Community colleges made commitments individually, and in partnership with neighboring school districts and four-year institutions, to build seamless transitions among institutions, develop clear educational and career pathways, implement strategies to increase student completion of STEM programs, and establish more accurate measures of student progress and success. 

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by the Press Secretary on Boston’s nomination to host the 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games

The President and First Lady extend their congratulations to the City of Boston on its nomination by the United States Olympic Committee to host the 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games. The city has taught all of us what it means to be Boston Strong. The President and First Lady couldn't be prouder of this accomplishment and of all of our nation's athletes, and strongly support the effort to bring the 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games to the United States.  We hope to welcome athletes from around the globe to compete in Boston in 2024.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by the President on the Retirement of Senator Barbara Boxer

Barbara Boxer is more than a Senator – she’s an institution.  She’s served the people of California for more than three decades with distinction, fighting for the issues that are close to their homes and hearts.  Thanks to Barbara, more Americans breathe clean air and drink clean water.  More women have access to healthcare.  More children have safe places to go after school.  More public lands have been protected for future generations.  More Americans travel on safe roads and bridges.  And more young women have been inspired to achieve their biggest dreams, having Barbara as an incredible role model.

It’s been a pleasure to work with Barbara.  She works as hard as anyone to get things done for the people of California.  When she leaves the Senate at the end of this term, she will be missed greatly.  But for now, I’m looking forward to working with her for the next two years, on behalf of Californians and all Americans.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Presidential Nominations Sent to the Senate

NOMINATIONS SENT TO THE SENATE:

Walter A. Barrows, of Ohio, to be a Member of the Railroad Retirement Board for a term expiring August 28, 2019.  (Reappointment)

Allison Beck, of the District of Columbia, to be Federal Mediation and Conciliation Director, vice George H. Cohen, resigned.

Michele Thoren Bond, of the District of Columbia, a Career Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Class of Minister-Counselor, to be an Assistant Secretary of State (Consular Affairs), vice Janice L. Jacobs, resigned.

Michael P. Botticelli, of the District of Columbia, to be Director of National Drug Control Policy, vice R. Gil Kerlikowske, resigned.

Jonodev Osceola Chaudhuri, of Arizona, to be Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission for the term of three years, vice Tracie Stevens.

Gilberto de Jesus, of Maryland, to be Chief Counsel for Advocacy, Small Business Administration, vice Winslow Lorenzo Sargeant.

Russell C. Deyo, of New Jersey, to be Under Secretary for Management, Department of Homeland Security, vice Rafael Borras, resigned.

Tho Dinh-Zarr, of Texas, to be a Member of the National Transportation Safety Board for the remainder of the term expiring December 31, 2018, vice Deborah Hersman, resigned.

Romonia S. Dixon, of Arizona, to be a Member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and Community Service for a term expiring October 6, 2018, vice Matthew Francis McCabe, term expired.

Todd A. Fisher, of New York, to be a Member of the Board of Directors of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation for a term expiring December 17, 2016, vice James A. Torrey, term expired.

Paul A. Folmsbee, of Oklahoma, a Career Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Class of Minister-Counselor, to be Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to the Republic of Mali.

Earl L. Gay, of the District of Columbia, to be Deputy Director of the Office of Personnel Management, vice Christine M. Griffin.

Jeffery S. Hall, of Kentucky, to be a Member of the Farm Credit Administration Board, Farm Credit Administration, for a term expiring October 13, 2018, vice Leland A. Strom, term expired.

Jennifer Ann Haverkamp, of Indiana, to be Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, vice Kerri-Ann Jones, resigned.

Victoria Ann Hughes, of Virginia, to be a Member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and Community Service for a term expiring October 6, 2016, vice James Palmer, term expired.

Adri Davin Jayaratne, of Michigan, to be an Assistant Secretary of Labor, vice Brian Vincent Kennedy.

David Avren Jones, of Connecticut, to be a Member of the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board for a term expiring October 11, 2018.  (Reappointment).

Mary Lucille Jordan, of Maryland, to be a Member of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission for a term of six years expiring August 30, 2020.  (Reappointment)

Michael D. Kennedy, of Georgia, to be a Member of the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board for a term expiring September 25, 2018.  (Reappointment).

Marisa Lago, of New York, to be a Deputy United States Trade Representative, with the rank of Ambassador, vice Miriam E. Sapiro, resigned.

Michelle K. Lee, of California, to be Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, vice David J. Kappos, resigned.

Eric P. Liu, of Washington, to be a Member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and Community Service for a term expiring December 27, 2017, vice Layshae Ward, term expired.

Rafael J. López, of California, to be Commissioner on Children, Youth, and Families, Department of Health and Human Services, vice Bryan Hayes Samuels, resigned.

Daniel Henry Marti, of Virginia, to be Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator, Executive Office of the President, vice Victoria Angelica Espinel, resigned.

Therese W. McMillan, of California, to be Federal Transit Administrator, vice Peter M. Rogoff, resigned.

Dava J. Newman, of Massachusetts, to be Deputy Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, vice Lori Garver, resigned.

Deven J. Parekh, of New York, to be a Member of the Board of Directors of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation for a term expiring December 17, 2016, vice Katherine M. Gehl, resigned.

Azita Raji, of California, to be Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to the Kingdom of Sweden.

Mark Scarano, of New Hampshire, to be Federal Cochairperson of the Northern Border Regional Commission, vice Sandford Blitz, resigned.

David S. Shapira, of Pennsylvania, to be a Governor of the United States Postal Service for a term expiring December 8, 2019, vice Dennis J. Toner, term expired.

Carlos J. Torres, of Virginia, to be Deputy Director of the Peace Corps, vice Carolyn Hessler Radelet, resigned.

Michael Young, of Pennsylvania, to be a Member of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission for a term of six years expiring August 30, 2020.  (Reappointment)

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Presidential Nominations Sent to the Senate

NOMINATIONS SENT TO THE SENATE:

Patricia D. Cahill, of Missouri, to be a Member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting for a term expiring January 31, 2020.  (Reappointment)

Walter Hood, of California, to be a Member of the National Council on the Arts for a term expiring September 3, 2020, vice Barbara Ernst Prey, term expired.

Kristen Marie Kulinowski, of New York, to be a Member of the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board for a term of five years, vice Beth J. Rosenberg, resigned.

Diane Helen Rodriguez, of California, to be a Member of the National Council on the Arts for a term expiring September 3, 2018, vice Joan Israelite, term expired.

Kristen Joan Sarri, of Michigan, to be an Assistant Secretary of the Interior, vice Rhea S. Suh, resigned.

Sally Quillian Yates, of Georgia, to be Deputy Attorney General, vice James Michael Cole, resigning.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Press Gaggle aboard Air Force One en route Andrews AFB, 01/08/15

Aboard Air Force One
En Route Andrews Air Force Base 

12:38 P.M. MST

MR. EARNEST:  Ready to get started?  I've got a few things at the top.  The first is, as we speak, the President has convened a call with his national security team back in Washington, D.C. They’re going to do a couple things on the call.  The first is the President is going to get an update on the latest on the investigation that the French are conducting into the terror attacks that happened yesterday.  The second is the President is going to get a review of terror threat information -- this is something the President does periodically and he convened a meeting shortly before the holidays to get an update on the terror threat, and he’s going to get a brief update on that today.

I would point out in that context, however, that the Department of Homeland Security has said there’s no indication of a specific threat related to yesterday’s attack.  So it's important to keep that in mind even as the President gets this kind of update.

Q    -- in the United States?

MR. EARNEST:  Yes.  I'm sorry if I didn’t say that.  So thank you for helping to clarify.

The third thing is they’re going to discuss the security posture that is in place to protect Americans both at home and around the world.  And this is the thing that's always foremost on the President’s mind.  When we see terrible incidents like this that strike in other countries we want to make sure that we're doing every single thing that we can at U.S. facilities, military and diplomatic, around the globe to protect Americans there.

Participants on that call will include senior officials from the FBI, the Department of Justice, the CIA, the DNI, NCTC, and of course, the Department of Homeland Security.

The second thing is, prior to that call, the President had the opportunity to telephone United States Senator Barbara Boxer from California.  A little bit earlier today, she announced her intention to retire at the end of this session of Congress.  She serves the people of California with distinction in the United States Congress, and the President wanted to take the opportunity to call her and congratulate her on her retirement and to thank her for her many years of service.

Finally -- and this is a little different from those previous two things -- I also want to make note of the fact that it's been almost two months now that the President nominated U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch to succeed Eric Holder as the next Attorney General of the United States.  Despite the fact that she was nominated nearly two months ago, a date for her hearing has not yet been set by the United States Senate. 

Now, you’ll recall that we had a little bit of a conversation shortly after her nomination -- I think even before her nomination -- that there was a pretty clear precedent for a prompt consideration of national security officials who have been nominated to important positions -- for them to be considered promptly and confirmed promptly by the Senate.  We even talked about the fact that there’s a precedent for the prompt consideration of those individuals in a lame duck session.  But because of the President’s desire to work with the incoming Republican majority, we held off on insisting that she be confirmed in the lame duck and said that we would allow her to be considered by the incoming Congress.

Now, this is a very important job, obviously, and she is somebody who was previously confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate for the federal prosecutor job that she currently holds.  I guess the point is she deserves a lot better treatment than she’s currently receiving.  We would like for the United States Senate to set a date for her hearing as soon as possible in the month of January -- certainly no later than the end of January -- because we believe it's important for the Senate to act promptly on her nomination and we would like to see her confirmed before the Congress goes on their mid-February recess.

So we believe that her nomination can and should be considered during this work period.  We believe strongly that she deserves careful consideration and strong bipartisan support.  That's what she got when she was nominated just a couple of years ago to be the federal prosecutor in New York City.  And we believe that she should get the same consideration, that she should be considered promptly, that she should be confirmed in bipartisan fashion before the end of this work period in Congress.

So with that long windup, let’s go to your questions.

Q    Back to the situation in France and the President’s meeting today.  Now that French authorities have put out the names of the suspects in this attack, there’s been some report that they were known to U.S. officials.  Can you say whether that's the case and whether having the names has given the U.S. any more information about any links they may have to terror organizations?

MR. EARNEST:  I'm not in a position to comment on any aspect of the ongoing French investigation at this point.  I will say -- and I mentioned this a little bit yesterday -- that when the President spoke to President Hollande on the telephone, the President pledged to offer any needed assistance in their investigation.  And the United States obviously has a very strong counterterrorism partnership that’s in place with France, and we share a lot of different information.  And if we can be helpful in sharing any sort of intelligence that we’ve collected that will aid their investigation, then we’ll certainly do that.

Q    Is that happening at this point?  Have the French taken you up on that offer? 

MR. EARNEST:  It’s my understanding that there have been frequent conversations between a variety of American national security officials and their French counterparts, including conversations between members of our intelligence community.  But I’m not in a position to talk about the details or the content of those conversations.

Q    The speech today had a passing reference to Fannie and Freddie, and following the speech both of their stocks dropped nearly 10 percent based on the remarks that the President does still want to wind them down.  Was it his intent to say something new on that?  Or was that a market reaction that was not anticipated?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, I would hesitate to try to decipher some sort of market reaction.  But what the President did say in his remarks is consistent with our past comments on this issue.  The President has articulated his concerns with the way that those programs are currently structured, and there is a proposal that we’ve put forward for putting in place some reforms that would be good for the housing sector, good for homeowners, and good for taxpayers.  But the President was not hinting at any sort of new policy position with regard to those two entities.

Q    Just to clarify that, there was no departure intended in any way in his remarks from what the current policy, standing policy on Fannie and Freddie has been?

MR. EARNEST:  That’s correct.  There was no change in our posture as it relates to our policy and our view of needed reforms for Fannie and Freddie. 

Q    Josh, what can you tell us about what the President will propose tomorrow for community colleges?  And is he looking to emulate what Tennessee has done with their tuition programs?

MR. EARNEST:  I don’t have a lot right now on tomorrow’s events.  I can tell you that one of the reasons that we are going to Tennessee is that the state of Tennessee has worked hard to open up the doors to a college education to more middle-class students in Tennessee.  That is a laudable goal.  That is an effort that has already yielded important economic benefits for that state. 

I’d also note that those kinds of reforms and some of those pretty innovative policies were put in place by a Republican governor, and are, I understand, supported by the Republicans senators from that state.  So there’s no reason that these kinds of efforts to make a college education more affordable and make sure that middle-class students are getting access to a high-quality education and job training that’s needed to get a good middle-class job -- there’s no reason that that should be a partisan issue.  And the President is hopeful that we’ll be able to work with Democrats and Republicans in Congress to make some progress in that area.  But the President will have more to say on this tomorrow.

Q    Is his announcement tomorrow going to be something that he can do executively?  Or is it going to require congressional authorization?

MR. EARNEST:  I think there will be an allusion to some executive actions that are possible, but what the President has in mind tomorrow will be some steps that we can take with Congress -- again, steps that have been embraced in bipartisan fashion in Tennessee and we believe should be embraced in bipartisan fashion on Capitol Hill.

Q    Josh, on Lynch, Grassley’s office said yesterday to us that they had told you guys they were going to do hearings at the end of January or early February.  Is that wrong?  Did they not tell you guys that?

MR. EARNEST:  I’m not aware of a conversation like that occurring.  Now, I obviously was on the road yesterday.  But based on some conversations that I’ve had with my White House colleagues today, I’m not aware that a specific date has been either --

Q    Not a specific date, but --

MR. EARNEST:  -- communicated to us or set.  And that is what we’re focused on.

Again, she was nominated almost two months ago.  And there would have been a very clear precedent for us to urge Congress -- urge the Senate to take up her nomination when there was a Democratic majority to fill this very important national security position.  And we did not do that out of deference to the Republican -- the incoming Republican majority.  And it seems appropriate that that incoming Republican majority would act quickly to schedule a specific date as soon as possible in January, but certainly no later than the end of the month, and then to vote on her nomination before the end of the work period. And we’re confident that if a vote is held and her nomination is carefully considered that she’ll get strong bipartisan support. She certainly deserves it.

Q    Is there anything you guys can do to urge that along besides standing here and saying that?  (Laughter.) 

MR. EARNEST:  You mean beyond the very persuasive message that I’ve tried to send from here?

Q    Yes.

MR. EARNEST:  If there is, we’ll let you know.

Q    Anything on Ash Carter yet?  Forgive my ignorance on that one.

MR. EARNEST:  I don’t know that there’s one that’s been announced publicly.  He obviously was announced -- nominated more recently.  But we wouldn’t want the consideration of his nomination to be subjected to undue delay either.  So we obviously -- both Ms. Lynch and Mr. Carter have important positions and important work ahead of them, and we hope that the Senate will carefully consider their nomination, do it promptly, and give them the bipartisan support they deserve.

Q    And on the topic of nominations, what about Antonio Weiss?  Any updates on timing?

MR. EARNEST:  No updates on that.

Q    Josh, the Gabby Giffords meeting today -- can you tell us any more about that meeting with the President, any more detail?  And how did that meeting come about?  Did the President initiate that meeting?

MR. EARNEST:  The President did invite Ms. Giffords and her husband, Mark Kelly, to come to the event in Phoenix.  The President, over the last several years, has had an opportunity in a variety of settings to meet with the two of them.  So the President is obviously very fond of Ms. Giffords and is, as I think you could tell from his public remarks today, remarkably impressed by the kind of courage that she has shown under unthinkably difficult circumstances.  And the President is, like the rest of the country and certainly like the people of Arizona, incredibly proud of her.  She is a genuine hero.  And the President was pleased to have the opportunity to visit with her briefly backstage. 

It was a pretty informal opportunity for them to catch up.  There was no specific, serious business discussed, but rather an opportunity for the President just to see her again and to wish her well on a fateful anniversary.

Q    Giffords and her husband have obviously been big advocates of gun control legislation.  Did they bring this up with the President at all?  Did he say anything to them about any plan that he might have to try to bring this back up before the end of his presidency?

MR. EARNEST:  I don’t know, frankly, if they discussed that issue.  That is something that they have talked about in the past.  The President certainly appreciates their leadership on this issue.  This is something that the President has been fighting for and something that they’ve been very vocal about, too.  So he certainly appreciates their leadership.  I don’t, frankly, know whether or not they discussed it today.

Q    Did the White House give any consideration to having the President visit the VA hospital in Phoenix while he was here?

MR. EARNEST:  Not really.  The President traveled to Arizona because Arizona was one of the states that was most hardest-hit  -- or at least the housing market in Arizona was the most-hardest hit or among the most hardest-hit states in the country in the midst of the housing downturn.  And so this was an appropriate venue for the President to talk about some steps that he believes we can take, and the steps that he has taken, using his executive authority, to try to build on the momentum in the housing market. These are the kinds of -- these are common-sense steps that will save middle-class homeowners $900 a year and would benefit hundreds of thousands of homeowners over the next couple of years.

But I certainly do welcome what I perceive to be some renewed interest in the story about what’s happening at the VA facility in Phoenix.  So if you’ll indulge me for just a minute, I will note --

Q    You have some statistics?

MR. EARNEST:  I do.  Since June, more than 300 employees have started -- more than 300 new employees have started work at the VA facility in Phoenix.  And it’s no coincidence that after those employees have taken office and some reforms have been put in place that there’s been a 19 percent increase in the number of appointments that have been scheduled and completed in the period between May and October.  That’s a total of more than 300,000 appointments that have been conducted.  Wait times at this facility have been reduced by 30 percent over that same period. 

You’ll recall that the Phoenix facility was the first stop of both Sloan Gibson when he served as the Acting Director of the VA and the first stop of the relatively new VA Secretary, Bob McDonald.  Some of the reforms that were put in place in Phoenix have been put in place at VA facilities across the country, and we’ve seen corresponding improvements in the operations of VA facilities across the country. 

Some of those improvements are also the result of 19 executive actions that the President announced back in August to try to improve service delivery for our veterans at VA facilities across the country.  And the President is certainly pleased that they’ve made these kinds of improvements.  This is a priority for this administration.  There’s obviously a lot more to do, and the President is going to continue to make sure that these issues are getting the focus that they need internally, that we can continue making important progress on these reforms.

Q    Speaker Boehner indicated he was still waiting for a proposal from the President about reform.  Do you see it that way?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, I guess what I would say is there are a number of reforms that have already been put in place -- that the President has put in place using his executive authority that are already showing substantial improvement.  And if there are ideas that Democrats and Republicans in Congress have for further strengthening the operations at the VA we certainly would welcome the opportunity to work in bipartisan support to make sure that we’re living up to the commitment that we made to our veterans.

Q    We drove by the facility on the way into the high school and on the way out.  Was the feeling that if the President had stopped there, it would have been like a photo op and the kind of thing you guys have said you’re not interested in?

MR. EARNEST:  No, it’s just a simple matter of the President was there to talk about the housing market and the way that the state of Arizona is starting to show some building momentum in the housing market in a way that’s good for that sector of the economy and good for middle-class homeowners not just in Arizona but across the country.  And so it seemed an appropriate venue for the President to talk about an executive action that he wants to take that’s actually going to save homeowners money.  So he was just there to talk about a different topic.

Q    Thanks, Josh.

MR. EARNEST:  Anybody else?  Okay.  Thanks, guys.

END
12:54 P.M. MST

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, President Barack Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to key Administration posts:

  • Patricia Cahill – Member, Board of Directors of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting
  • Walter Hood – Member, National Council on the Arts
  • Diane Rodriguez – Member, National Council on the Arts
  • Kristen Kulinowski – Member, Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board
  • Kristen Sarri – Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget, Department of the Interior

President Obama also announced his intent to appoint the following individuals to key Administration posts:

  • Brian E. Argrett – Member, Community Development Advisory Board
  • Barbara B. Franklin – Member, Federal Service Impasses Panel, Federal Labor Relations Authority
  • Edward F. Hartfield – Member, Federal Service Impasses Panel, Federal Labor Relations Authority
  • William H. Leary – Member, Public Interest Declassification Board

President Obama said, “These fine public servants bring a depth of experience and tremendous dedication to their important roles.  I look forward to working with them in the months and years to come.”

President Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to key Administration posts:

Patricia Cahill, Nominee for Member, Board of Directors of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting

Patricia Cahill is a reporter, producer, and program and news director.  Ms. Cahill has served as a Member of the Board of the Directors of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting from 2009 to 2014, and from 2012 to 2014, she served as Chairman.  From 1987 to 2012, Ms. Cahill was the general manager of KCUR-FM, a public radio station at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, where she also taught journalism and speech communication.  Previously, Ms. Cahill was the President of Public Radio in Mid America and Vice President of the Kansas Public Radio Association.  She was a member of the National Public Radio Board of Directors, Catherine’s Place, Goodwill of Western Missouri and Eastern Kansas, and Chair of the Board of Directors of Wichita Free University.  Ms. Cahill received a B.A. and M.A. from the University of Kansas.

Walter Hood, Nominee for Member, National Council on the Arts

Walter Hood is a professor of Landscape Architecture, Environmental Planning, and Urban Design at the University of California, Berkeley, where he has been the David K. Woo Chair in Environmental Design since 2013, and previously chaired the Landscape Architecture and Environmental Design Department from 1998 to 2002.  In 1992, he established Hood Design landscape architecture studio, whose projects include landscape design  for the new De Young Museum in San Francisco and designing Lafayette Square Park and Splash Pad Park in Oakland.  Mr. Hood served as a Goldman Sachs Design Fellow for the Smithsonian Institute in 2011 and was named the inaugural MIT School of Architecture and Planning Robert Taylor Fellow, honoring MIT’s first African American graduate, in 2011.  He was named Master of Design by Fast Company Magazine in 2010, received the Cooper-Hewitt National Design Award for Landscape Design in 2009. and won the City of Nashville’s design competition to create public art in commemoration of the city’s role in the civil rights movement to be installed in 2015.  Mr. Hood received a B.L.A. from North Carolina State University, an M.L.A. and M.Arch from the University of California, Berkeley and an M.F.A. from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago.

Diane Rodriguez, Nominee for Member, National Council on the Arts

Diane Rodriguez is Associate Artistic Director at Center Theatre Group in Los Angeles, where she has held various positions since 1995.  She was Associate Producer and Director of New Play Production from 2005 to 2014, and was Director and Resident Artist of the Latino Theatre Initiative from 1995 to 2005.  Ms. Rodriguez was also an Artistic Associate at the Cornerstone Theater Company from 1999 to 2005.  She is a Co-Founder of two theatre companies, Latins Anonymous and El Teatro de la Esperanza (Theatre of Hope).  Ms. Rodriguez was a leading actress for the Chicano theatre company, El Teatro Campesino (Theatre of the Farmworkers) from 1973 to 1984.  In 2007, she won an OBIE Award for playing multiple roles in “Tale of Two Cities: an American Joyride on Multiple Tracks.”  She is the current President of the Theatre Communications Group Board of Directors.  Ms. Rodriguez received a B.A. from the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Dr. Kristen Kulinowski, Nominee for Member, Chemical Safety Hazard Investigation Board

Dr. Kristen Kulinowski is a Research Staff Member at the IDA Science and Technology Policy Institute, a position she has held since 2011.  From 1998 to 2001, and again from 2002 to the present, she has been a faculty member in the Rice University Department of Chemistry.  Dr. Kulinowski also worked in various additional capacities at Rice University – from 2005 to 2011 as Director of the International Council on Nanotechnology, and from 2002 to 2011 as an Executive Director for the NSF Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology.  From 2001 to 2002, Dr. Kulinowski served as a Congressional Science Policy Fellow in the office of The Honorable Edward J. Markey.  From 1995 to 1998, she was a lecturer in chemistry at California Polytechnic State University.  Dr. Kulinowski is a member of the American Chemical Society and has advised governments in North America, Europe, and Asia on nanotechnology policy issues.  Dr. Kulinowski received a B.S. from Canisius College and an M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Rochester.    

Kristen Sarri, Nominee for Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget, Department of the Interior

Kristen Sarri is the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Policy, Management and Budget at the Department of the Interior, a position she has held since 2014.  Prior to this, she served as the Associate Director for Legislative Affairs at the Office of Management and Budget from 2011 to 2014.  Ms. Sarri served as Deputy Director of the Office of Policy and Strategic Planning at the Department of Commerce from 2010 to 2011.  From 2008 to 2010, Ms. Sarri worked as a Democratic Professional Staffer for the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.  From 2006 to 2008, she served as a Senior Policy Advisor for Senator Jack Reed.  Ms. Sarri was Legislative Director for the bipartisan Northeast-Midwest Senate Coalition from 2001 to 2006.  From 1993 to 1994, she worked as an Education Coordinator for the Cheetah Conservation Fund.  Ms. Sarri received a B.A. from Washington University and an M.P.H. and M.S. from the University of Michigan.

President Obama announced his intent to appoint the following individuals to key Administration posts:

Brian E. ArgrettAppointee for Member, Community Development Advisory Board

Brian E. Argrett is President and Chief Executive Officer of City First Bank of D.C., National Association, a position he has held since 2011.  Mr. Argrett was Founder and Managing Partner of both Fulcrum Capital Group and Fulcrum Capital Partners, L.P.  He also served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Fulcrum Venture Capital Corporation, a federally licensed and regulated Small Business Investment Company.  Mr. Argrett served as Chairman of FirstFed Financial Corp. from 2009 to 2011, and previously was a director of its subsidiary, First Federal Bank of California. Earlier, Mr. Argrett was an attorney with the real estate law firm of Pircher, Nichols & Meeks in Los Angeles.  He currently serves as the Vice Chairman of the Community Development Bankers Association and is a Member of the Community Bankers Council of the American Bankers Association.  Mr. Argrett received a B.S. from the University of Virginia and an M.B.A. and a J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley.

Barbara B. Franklin, Appointee for Member, Federal Service Impasses Panel, Federal Labor Relations Authority
Barbara B. Franklin is a Member of the Federal Service Impasses Panel, a position she has held since 2009.  She also has served as an arbitrator and mediator in Washington, D.C. since 1999.  Ms. Franklin was Chief Counsel to Members Pamela Talkin and Donald S. Wasserman of the Federal Labor Relations Authority from 1990 to 1995 and 1996 to 1997, respectively.  From 1977 to 1989, she served as a staff attorney and then a supervisory attorney for the National Labor Relations Board in the Office of General Counsel, Division of Advice.  From 1999 to 2014, she was a Public Member of the D.C. Police and Firefighters Retirement and Relief Board, a position that is appointed by the Mayor of D.C.  She is also a member of the Executive Committee of Friendship Place, a nonprofit organization that serves the homeless population of the D.C. metropolitan area.  Ms. Franklin received a B.A. from Northwestern University and a J.D. from The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law.

Edward F. Hartfield, Appointee for Member, Federal Service Impasses Panel, Federal Labor Relations Authority

Edward F. Hartfield is a Member of the Federal Service Impasses Panel, a position he has held since 2009, and previously held from 1994 to 2002.  He has also been President of Hartfield Resolutions Group since 2010, and a full time mediator and arbitrator since 1976.  From 1988 to 2010, he was Executive Director of the National Center for Dispute Settlement.  From 1979 to 1988, Mr. Hartfield served as Commissioner with the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, and was State Mediator for the New Jersey Office of Dispute Settlement from 1976 to 1979.  He has also served as the International President of the Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution and served on the Michigan Supreme Court Dispute Resolution Task Force.  Mr. Hartfield also is a member of various arbitration panels, including the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, the National Mediation Board, the Michigan Employment Relations Commission, and the Employment Relations Boards for the states of Ohio and Iowa.  Mr. Hartfield received a B.A. from Oberlin College and an M.A. from the University of Detroit. 

William H. Leary, Appointee for Member, Public Interest Declassification Board

William H. Leary served as a Special Adviser to the National Security Advisor and Senior Director for Records and Access Management on the National Security Council from 1994 until his retirement in 2011.  Mr. Leary served as Chair of the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel from 2003 to 2011 after being Acting Chair from 2000 to 2003.  He also served as the first Chair of the Records Access and Information Security Interagency Policy Committee.  Before joining the National Security Council staff, Mr. Leary served as the Deputy Director of the Agency Services Division at the National Archives and Records Administration from 1985 to 1991.  Mr. Leary was one of the officers who helped to create the Public Interest Declassification Board in 2000, and served as member from 2012 to 2014.  In 2009, he helped to develop Executive Order 13526 on Classified National Security Information.  Mr. Leary received a B.A., M.A., and A.B.D. from the University of Virginia.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President on Housing -- Phoenix, AZ

Central High School
Phoenix, Arizona

11:06 A.M. MST

THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, Arizona!  (Applause.)  Hey!  (Applause.)  Happy New Year, Arizona.  (Applause.)  Go, Bobcats. (Applause.) 

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  We love you!

THE PRESIDENT:  I love you back.  (Applause.)   

It’s good to be in Phoenix.  (Applause.)  And I mean that, because I was in Detroit yesterday, which is a great city but it was 60 degrees colder.  (Laughter.)  So it feels pretty good, this weather right here.  I had a couple staff people who said, we’re going to miss the plane.  (Laughter.)  They’re just going to try to get stranded here for a while.  (Laughter.) 

But I went to Detroit, I went here -- I guess between the Lions and the Cardinals, this is my post-wild card consolation tour.  (Laughter.)  As a Bears fan, I want you to know that, first of all, you guys did a lot better than we did.  (Laughter.) You got a great coach; you got a great team.  You had some bad luck.  And there’s always next year.  So keep your chin up.  Keep your chin up.  

I want to thank Secretary Castro not just for the terrific introduction, but for the great job he’s doing every day.  (Applause.)  I want to thank your Congressman, Ruben Gallego.  (Applause.)  Where’s Ruben?  Where is he?  Ruben, I already liked him, and then he told me he was from Chicago originally, before he got smart and moved to warmer weather (Laughter.) 

I want to thank your Mayor, Greg Stanton.  (Applause.)  He was there.  There he is.  Greg is doing a great job.  I want to thank your principal, John Biera, Jr.  (Applause.)  And your superintendent, Kent Scribner.  (Applause.)  And I want to thank all the students and staff and faculty who may be here.  We really appreciate your hospitality.

One last acknowledgement.  I had a chance to meet a couple of really good friends -- Mark Kelly and Gabby Giffords. (Applause.)  This was a remarkable meeting for me because it was four years ago today that Gabby and some other wonderful Arizonans were gunned down outside a supermarket in Tucson.  It's a tough day for a lot of folks down there.  We keep them in our thoughts and prayers. 

But Gabby is doing great.  She looks wonderful, and she’s got the same energy and passion that she always has had.  Even as she’s waged her own fight to recover, she’s fought to prevent the next tragedies from happening to others.  She’s a hero, and she is a great Arizonan.  (Applause.)  So we’re really proud of her.  And her brother, who is also an astronaut -- her brother-in-law, who’s also an astronaut, is going to be in space for a year. He was just on the cover of Time Magazine, which I know there’s some folks in Washington who wish I was going to be in space for a year, but -- (laughter) -- but I'm still around.  (Applause.)  Because I got some work to do.

Now, I am here because one of my New Year’s resolutions is to make sure more Americans in Phoenix and in Arizona and all across the country feel like they’re coming back.  Because the country is coming back, but I want everybody to feel like things are getting better and we are moving in the right direction.  And let there be no doubt -- thanks to the steps we took early on to rescue our economy, to rebuild it on a new foundation, America is coming back.  (Applause.) 

And that’s not just my own opinion.  Here are the facts.  2014 was the strongest year for job growth since the 1990s.  (Applause.)  We’ve had 57 straight months of private sector job growth, created nearly 11 million new jobs.  (Applause.)  Since 2010, we’ve put more people back to work than Europe, Japan, and every advanced economy combined.  (Applause.)  American manufacturing is growing at the fastest pace since the ‘90s.  We’re now the number-one producer of oil, of gas.  And by the way, you’re saving about a buck-ten a gallon at the pump over this time last year.  (Applause.)

Although I was in Detroit and I told folks yesterday, gas prices aren’t going to be low forever, so don’t start suddenly saying you don’t have to worry about fuel efficiency.  If you’re going out shopping for a new car, don’t think it’s always going to be this low, because then you’ll be surprised and you’ll be mad at me later -- (laughter) -- and I’ll be able to say, I told you don’t get a gas guzzler because gas is going to go back up. But while it’s low, enjoy it.  And feel free to spend some of that money on local businesses, who then will hire more people and put more folks back to work.  (Applause.)

Meanwhile, thanks to the Affordable Care Act, about 10 million Americans have gained health insurance in the past year alone.  (Applause.) 

We’ve done all this while cutting our federal deficit by about two-thirds.  And I’m going to repeat that, because they did a poll the other day and like 70 percent of the people think the deficit is going up.  No, 70 percent of the people.  You stop people on the street -- 7 out of 10 think the deficit is going up.  The deficit has gone down by two-thirds since I was President of the United States.  (Applause.)  So we’re doing all this in a fiscally responsible way.  (Applause.)

And maybe closest to my heart, after 13 long years, our war in Afghanistan has come to a responsible end, which means more of our brave troops spent time with their families this holiday season, right here back home.  (Applause.) 

So these last six years required hard work and sacrifice by everybody.  But as a country, we have a right to be proud that all that hard work paid off.  America’s resurgence is real.  And now that we’ve got some calmer waters out there, if everybody does their part, if we all work together, we can make sure that the tide starts lifting all boats again.  We can get wages and incomes growing faster.  We can make sure the middle class is growing, that the ladders of the middle class for folks who are struggling are firm and steady and have a lot of rungs to them.  Because it’s the middle class, it’s working families that power America’s prosperity.  That’s always been the case; that will be true for decades to come.  (Applause.)

And I’ve got a State of the Union address in about two weeks and that’s what I want to talk about -- building on the progress we’ve made.  But of course, why wait for the State of the Union? It’s sort of like you’ve got presents under the tree, you kind of start shaking them a little bit.  (Laughter.)  I want to kind of give you a little sense of what I want to talk about.  So we’re going to start this week laying out some of the agenda for the next year.

And here in Phoenix, I want to talk about helping more families afford their piece of the American Dream, and that is owning their own home.  (Applause.)  

Now, let me just say, right now Michelle and I live in rental housing.  (Laughter.)  We don’t own where we live.  We’ve got two years remaining on our lease.  (Laughter.)  I’m hoping I get my security deposit back.  (Laughter.)  Although Bo and Sunny have been tearing things up occasionally -- we’re going to have to clean things up a little bit.  (Laughter.)

But I’ll never forget the day we bought our first place, a place of our own -- a condo, back in Chicago.  And for us, and millions of Americans like us, buying a home has always been about more than owning a roof and four walls.  It’s about investing in savings, and building a family, and planting roots in a community.  So we bought this place -- it was about, I guess, probably about 2,000 square feet.  It was in this complex called East View Park.  It was sort of like a railway apartment. And it felt huge when we moved in.  And then Malia and Sasha were born, and their toys got everywhere.  (Laughter.)  And then it felt small because they basically took over the whole dining room with their toys. 

But I have such good memories not just about the place itself, but all the work we had to do to save to get in there, and then to fix it up, and that sense of accomplishment that you were building something for your family and for your future.

And that's always been true.  When my grandfather came back from World War II, this country gave him the chance to buy his first home with a loan from the FHA.  For folks like him, a home was proof that America was a place where if you worked hard, if you were responsible, it was rewarded. 

But we all know what happened in the last decade when responsibility gave way to recklessness.  Families who did the right thing and bought a home that they could afford, and made their payments each month, and did everything right, when the market plummeted they got hurt.  Even though somebody else was acting irresponsibly -- whether on Wall Street, or folks who weren’t responsible in terms of how they were dealing with their real estate -- ordinary families got hurt bad.  And that was especially true here in Arizona. 

There were folks who borrowed more than they should have.  There were lenders who really were just worried about making profits and not whether the people they were lending to were going to be able to keep up their homes.  So home values plunged. Americans sank underwater.  Foreclosures skyrocketed.  Builders stopped building.  Construction workers lost their jobs. 

And when I came into office, I believed we could not let this crisis play itself out.  If we could save more families from losing everything they had worked so hard to build, we had to make the effort.  So less than a month after I took office, I came here to Arizona to lay out my plan to get responsible homeowners back on their feet.  And I said that healing our housing market wouldn’t be easy, it would not be quick.  But we were going to act swiftly, we were going to act boldly, we were going to try everything that we could to help responsible homeowners.  If something didn't work, we’d try something else.  But we were going to try to keep folks in their homes.

And we ended up helping millions stay in their homes.  We helped millions more save thousands of dollars each year by refinancing.  We helped folks who didn’t want to buy a home or who weren’t ready to buy find an affordable place to rent.  We kept up our fight against homelessness.  And by the way -- there’s some homeless advocates here -- since 2010, we’ve helped bring one in three homeless veterans off the streets.  (Applause.)  And I want to make sure everybody knows -- under Mayor Stanton, Phoenix is leading the way in that effort.  (Applause.)  Phoenix is doing a great job.  (Applause.)

So as a result of all these efforts, today, home sales are up nearly 50 percent from where they were in the worst of the crisis.  Homebuilding has more than doubled.  That's created hundreds of thousands of construction jobs.  New foreclosures are at their lowest level since 2006.  Since 2012, nearly 10 million fewer Americans have their homes underwater.  Rising home prices have put hundreds of billions of dollars of wealth back in the pockets of middle-class families.

Now, I want everybody to be clear -- this progress is not an accident.  It is not luck.  It’s what happens when you have policies that put middle-class families first.  (Applause.) 

And what’s true in Arizona is true all across the country:  We’ve still got some more work to do, our job is not done, but what we're doing is working.  And we’ve got to keep at it.  We’ve got to stay at it. 

Today, here in Phoenix, I’m going to take a new action to help even more responsible families stake their claim on the middle class and buy their first new home.  Starting this month, the Federal Housing Authority will lower its mortgage insurance premium rates enough to save the average new borrower more than $900 a year.  (Applause.)  Now, that's $900 that can go towards paying the groceries, or gas, or a child’s education.  Or, depending on what your mortgage is, it might be a month’s mortgage payment. 

And for those who aren’t familiar with FHA, FHA underwrites, it guarantees, it’s the backstop for a lot of loans around the country, especially for middle-class folks.  So a lot of people pay these fees, and if they’re saving $900 that’s money that’s going to be going throughout the economy. 

Over the next three years, these lower premiums will give hundreds of thousands more families the chance to own their own home, and it will help make owning a home more affordable for millions more households overall in the coming years. 

And just to give you an example, earlier today, Secretary Castro and I visited Nueva Villas.  It’s a new neighborhood here in Phoenix where a lot of families are buying homes with the help of the FHA.  And we actually -- this was a big development that wasn’t finished or wasn’t all sold; the crisis came, half the homes were still unsold.  Folks lost their homes.  It started getting boarded up.  People were feeling insecure.  It was starting to get depressed.  Nonprofits, with the help of HUD, came in, purchased some of the properties, hired local residents to rehab them.  Now people are building them -- beautiful homes. And with the help of the FHA, we can now make sure that more people are getting access to these homes.  And today’s action will mean more money in the pockets of families like the ones that we’ve met. 

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Is this about housing?  (Laughter.)  All right. 

And keep in mind, hundreds of thousands of new buyers is going to mean a healthier housing market for everybody.  So how many people here own their own home?  (Applause.)  All right.  So even though you’ve already got your mortgage or your loan, already have your home, if your neighbors are buying more homes, that’s lifting the whole market here, which means the value of your home starts going up.  And that’s good for you.  (Applause.)  It means fewer foreclosure signs as people fix up old properties.  It means more construction, which means more jobs, which means a better economy.  So this is the kind of boost that we need to keep the momentum that we have seen over the last several years -- keep it going here in Phoenix and all across the country. 

So I want to be clear.  If you’re looking to take advantage of these lower rates, that’s great.  On the other hand, don’t buy something you can’t afford.  (Applause.)  You’re going to be out of luck.  These rates are for responsible buyers.  We’re not going down the road again of financing folks buying things they can’t afford.  We’re going to be cracking down on that.  We put in place tough rules on Wall Street and we created a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and we’re really policing irresponsible lenders luring folks into buying stuff they can’t afford.  (Applause.) 

And we designed a mortgage form that’s written in simple language so that people understand what the commitments are when you buy a home.  We’re cracking down on some of the worst practices that led to the housing crisis.  We’re going to protect middle-class families from getting ripped off.

And that’s why we had the Justice Department fight for buyers who were discriminated against or preyed upon, and we won a settlement that awarded more money to victims in one year than in the previous 23 years combined.  (Applause.)  That’s why we worked with states to force big banks to repay more than $50 billion to more than 1.5 million borrowers who had been treated wrongly -- and that was the largest lending settlement in history.  (Applause.)  And that’s why I’ve called on Congress to wind down the government-backed companies known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

So the bottom line is we don't think there’s anything wrong with pursuing a profit, but we want to make clear the days of making bad bets on the backs of taxpayer money and then getting bailed out afterwards -- we're not going back to that.  (Applause.)  We've worked too hard, and everything we’ve done to heal the housing markets we want to preserve.  But we do want to make sure that the housing market is strong and that responsible homeowners can get a good deal.  For people who have saved, done the right thing, now are looking to buy their first home, we want to make sure that they get a little bit of help.

In the end, everything we've done to heal the housing market is about more than just restoring housing values.  It's about restoring our common values.  It's about who we are as a country and who we are as communities.  

And I want to just tell you a quick story.  Lorraine Cona, from Sun City, next door, she did everything right.  She had a good job as a librarian.  She bought a home she could afford.  She wanted to retire in that home.  She made her payments on time.  Then, five years ago, through no fault of her own, she was laid off, and she started falling behind in her payments.  She knew foreclosure was coming.  She said, “I’d look out the window and I’d see somebody taking pictures of my house.”

But when things seemed darkest, Lorraine learned about something called the Hardest Hit fund –- it's a program that we created to help folks in states like Arizona that had been especially hard hit by the real estate crash.  And they helped her make her late payments -- because she had a great track record until she had lost her job.  They set her up with financial counseling so she could stay on track.  It wasn’t easy, but Lorraine repaired her credit.  She refinanced her mortgage.  And today, after a lifetime of hard work, Lorraine is retired, she’s back to making her payments every single month.  She’s in her home.  She was able to accomplish that.  Even though it was scary at times, she got it done.  Lorraine came back, just like Phoenix has come back.  (Applause.)  Just like Arizona has come back.  Just like America has come back.  (Applause.) 

It’s not just the economy turning around.  It’s turning around the lives of hardworking people, making sure that that hard work finally pays off.  (Applause.)  It’s making sure you finally get that job you’re looking for, or the raise you deserve, or a little bit of security, or the retirement that you’ve earned, or being able to send your kid to college so their lives are better than yours.  (Applause.)  That's what this is about. 

So I just want everybody to know that we have been through some tough times, but we are moving.  There are workers today with jobs who didn’t have jobs last year.  There are families who have got health insurance who didn’t have health insurance before.  (Applause.)  There are students who are in college right now who didn’t think they could afford it before.  (Applause.) There are heroes who had served tour after tour who are finally home with their families.  There are autoworkers who are building great American cars now when they thought that those plants were going to shut down. 

America is coming back.  (Applause.)  And the key, Arizona, is for us all to work together to make sure we keep it going.
   
Thank you, everybody.  God bless you.  God bless America.  (Applause.) 

END
11:29 A.M. MST

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at Nueva Villas Housing Complex -- Phoenix, AZ

Nueva Villas at Beverly Single-Family Housing Development
Phoenix, Arizona

10:03 A.M. MST

THE PRESIDENT:   Well, listen, I just had a chance to hear from Edmundo and David about this development.  Nueva Villas was originally a private development, but the timing obviously was tough because it happened right as the housing market here in Arizona and across the country was plummeting.  And because of the great work that this nonprofit has done, but also because of assistance from HUD, what the community has been able to do is, through a nonprofit, purchase some of these homes that were empty and vacant, hire local residents to help reconstruct them, and now they’re able to make homes available to working families.  A family of four that maybe makes $40,000 or $60,000 a year has a chance to buy a beautiful home in a terrific neighborhood. 

The market is stabilizing.  And what’s even better, some of the money that they then get as a consequence of the sale to these new families they’re able to use to rehab and move in even more families.  And so it’s a program that’s working well.  It’s one example of some of the steps that we’ve taken in order to strengthen the housing market. 

The thing I’m going to be announcing today is a new policy in which the fees that are charged by the FHA for loans are going to be reduced and could save a family like this, one that’s buying through FHA a home, could save them as much as $900 a year, which obviously makes a big difference if their payment is $900 a month.  It could be a full month’s payment that they’re saving, and that could make all the difference for a family that is owning its first home. 

And over time, this is going to potentially have an impact over millions of families all across the country.  It should help further accelerate growth in the housing market and stabilizing prices in areas like Arizona that have a long way to come back.  And it’s just one more example of the kinds of steps that we can take to build on the progress that’s already been made.  Housing has come back, but we can do even better.  There are still families out there who could benefit from great homes like this one, and we want to make sure that everybody has that access to that piece of the American Dream. 

So we’re really thrilled that we’re able to make this announcement.  I couldn’t be prouder of Secretary Castro for the work that HUD is doing in helping make a home like this available to families who need it, because you can see here in the neighborhood it is really looking great.

END
10:06 A.M. MST

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Josh Earnest en route to Detroit, MI, 01/07/15

Aboard Air Force One
En Route Detroit, Michigan

2:14 P.M. EST

MR. EARNEST:  Good afternoon, everybody.  It’s already been obviously a busy Wednesday.  A couple of things.  You heard from the President in the Oval Office about his personal reaction to the terror attacks that we saw in Paris very early this morning East Coast time.  The President does intend to try to get in touch with President Hollande at some point today.  Obviously President Hollande is very busy dealing with the immediate response to this crisis.  If there’s an opportunity for the President to speak to him today we'll try and take advantage of that, and we'll let you know once that call has occurred.

You also, prior to takeoff, have just been in a conference call about the announcement that the President intends to make tomorrow related to assistance that we can offer to responsible middle-class homeowners across the country.  The President will have more to say about that tomorrow.  There is a factsheet that our office back in Washington should be distributing here shortly.

But today, the President is traveling to Ford’s Michigan Assembly Plant just outside Detroit.  We're going to have some more background on this facility.  It sounds, actually, like a pretty interesting place.  It’s the world’s first flexible manufacturing facility that's building gasoline-powered, hybrid and plug-in vehicles all on the same production line.  And this is pretty good evidence of the kind of innovation that is driving the success of the American auto industry right now. 

This innovation and this new opportunity would not have been possible without the very difficult and, in some cases, legitimately politically unpopular decisions that the President made very early in his tenure in office to give the auto industry the space that it needed to make these kinds of -- to implement these kinds of innovations and rebuild their business.

And they have come back stronger than ever.  And that is thanks in no small part to the very hard work of men and women in the American auto industry who have used their skill and determination to build the finest automobiles on the planet.  And that is something the President is very proud of.  The President has had a number of occasions -- many of you have covered them -- to visit American autoworkers working on the assembly line.  And the President is looking forward to that visit today, primarily because it highlights some of the resilience that we're seeing in the American economy.  And the President has a lot of other ideas for what we can do to build on that momentum to make sure that middle-class families are benefiting from the American economic recovery that's underway and that is the envy of the world.

So the President will talk about that recovery today and talk about some of the ideas on Thursday and Friday that he has to build on that momentum.  You got a sense of what the President is going to talk about on Thursday in terms of what we can do to build on the momentum that we're seeing in the housing market. But we'll have obviously a lot more on that tomorrow.

With that, let me go to your questions.

Q    With respect to the situation in Paris, does the U.S. have an assessment or have the French shared their assessment with the U.S. on who these gunmen were and whether they have any links to a larger terror group?

MR. EARNEST:  As I mentioned earlier, the senior members of the President’s national security team have been in touch with their French counterparts since very early this morning.  In those conversations, the President’s team, at the President’s direction, offered any needed assistance that the French have in trying to figure out exactly what happened, trying to determine who was responsible, bringing them to justice, and also determining exactly what their motivation was.  So we've offered all of the assistance that we can offer. 

We are still in the early stages of tracking down those details, and the French are obviously very interested in finding this out, and this government is as well.  And we're going to provide them all the assistance that we can to try to get answers to some of these questions.

Q    So at this point, you can't say whether these gunmen were linked to any terror organization?

MR. EARNEST:  At this point, I cannot say that.  I can't rule it out either.  It's something we're still trying to determine.

Q    On the U.S. response to the attack in France, is the U.S. concerned about any risk here from this group or similar groups, and is there any plan to raise threat levels or anything like that in response to the attacks in France?

MR. EARNEST:  I'll say a couple things about that.  The first is as it relates to the threat level.  This is a decision that's made by the Secretary of Homeland Security, that he makes a decision about raising or lowering the terror threat level based on available intelligence.  I don't know of any plans to make a change to the terror threat level, but I would encourage you to check with the Department of Homeland Security to verify that.

What I can tell you is that today’s events in Paris that are so tragic are a reminder of how important it is for everybody to be vigilant about the threats that we face.  I don't say that to hint that somehow the French fell short of needed vigilance, only that today’s tragic terror attack is an indication of just how serious a threat we face.  And there are men and women in the U.S. national security infrastructure that are working around the clock to try to protect the American people and American interests both here at home and around the world.

The threat that we face is serious, but what we have is strong international cooperation with our partners around the globe to try to mitigate the threat that is posed by foreign fighters.  We are working very closely with leaders in the Muslim community both at home and around the world to try to counter the violent extremist messaging that ISIL and other extremist organizations are using to try to radicalize individuals around the globe.

There are some individuals that are using a peaceful religion and grossly distorting it, and trying to use its tenets to inspire people around the globe to carry out acts of violence. And we have enjoyed significant success in enlisting leaders in the Muslim community, like I said, both in the United States and around the world to condemn that kind of messaging, to condemn those efforts to radicalize individuals, and to be clear about what the tenets of Islam actually are.  And we’re going to redouble those efforts in the days and weeks ahead. 

And obviously, we’re still trying to figure out exactly, like I said, who’s responsible for this attack in Paris, what their motivations are.  But as a general matter, we’re very mindful of the threat from foreign fighters and the threat -- and the need to try to counter some of the extremist ideology that ISIL is propagating, using some pretty sophisticated social media strategies.

Q    -- the President briefed about it?

MR. EARNEST:  The President did have a Presidential Daily Briefing in the Oval Office this morning.  That was the first opportunity that he had to meet in person with his national security team.  And as you would expect, there was extensive discussion of this issue then.

Q    Were there any specific threats to news organizations or other groups in the United States that you guys are looking at?

MR. EARNEST:  There are no specific pieces of credible information that I’m aware of that we are paying particular attention to now.  That said, as I mentioned in answer to Angela’s question, we do continue to be very vigilant about this and there is a very active effort to monitor communications from ISIL that are made in public forums, to use our network of tools and our links to other countries that have a sophisticated intelligence infrastructure to try to monitor exactly what threats are emerging.

So this is something that we’re carefully watching.  And this is obviously something that our intelligence community watches closely and something that the Department of Homeland Security is obviously on top of. 

So for an up-to-date assessment of the threat picture, I’d encourage you to check with the intelligence community and with DHS.  But I’m not aware of anything right now that is the source of undue concern.  We’re obviously concerned about a lot of things, but nothing that stands out at this point.

Q    This obviously isn’t the first news organization that has published something that’s been deemed offensive to Muslims. I’m wondering what the President thinks -- whether he thinks that new organizations have any responsibility to not publish similar cartoons or articles, or whether that should be a decision that news organizations can (inaudible) regardless of threats.

MR. EARNEST:  Well, let me start by saying that there is no legitimate act of journalism, however offensive some people might find it, that justifies an act of violence, particularly an act of violence on the scale that we saw today.  None. 

That said, it is up to media organizations to make their own decisions about what they choose to publish, about what stories they choose to pursue, and what sort of commentary they want to broadcast about the world and about their government. 

And we believe very deeply in the importance of a free and independent media.  It’s hard to imagine the President putting himself into a position where he’s offering advice or even direction about what should or should not be published by legitimate, independent journalists.  That’s up to journalists to decide.  It doesn’t mean that the President, as we’ve discussed, likes every single thing that’s published.  But there is no piece of responsible journalism that, again, no matter how offensive some people may find it, that legitimizes an act of violence. 

Q    Does he find it different from what happened with the situation with North Korea and “The Interview” movie, where he said that he thought that the movie should be released?  He was putting himself in that position.  You’re saying that he wouldn’t put himself in that position over journalism?

MR. EARNEST:  I do think I would draw a bit of a distinction between entertainment -- an entertainment company and something that would be more clearly branded as journalism.  There are probably graduate-level courses in trying to draw these kinds of lines, so I'm going to hesitate to do that.  But I do think there’s a difference between those two things.  I think that even in the case of the decision that Sony had to make about “The Interview” the President indicated that he disagreed with the decision that they had made, but the President made no bones about the fact that that was a decision that can and should be exercised by the leader of that company.  And I don't think the President, despite his outward criticism of the decision they made, wanted to leave anybody with the impression that he was trying to suggest that he’s the one who should have made that decision instead.

Other questions?

Q    On Detroit, is the President taking a victory lap here?

MR. EARNEST:  Well, I don't think that's the way I would describe it, no.  I think what I would say, though, is two things.  One is that we do want to take advantage of the opportunity to talk about the results of the very difficult policy decisions that the President made early on in his presidency. 

One of the things that’s been pointed out in recent days to me is that it's not just that the President’s decision to rescue the auto industry was politically unpopular across the country.  It was essentially politically unpopular in Michigan for the President to take these steps to try to save the auto industry.  And that was a difficult thing for a newly elected President to do.  At the same time, I think that any sort of fair look-back at the last five years would indicate that the President made the right decision.  And I do think that that's worthy of some discussion.

But nobody is -- the reason that the auto industry is experiencing the kind of success that they have now is because we see highly skilled, highly motivated workers showing up to work every day and doing really good work.  And they are implementing the innovative vision of executives in the American auto industry, and designers and scientists at those companies.  And because of that innovation and that entrepreneurialism and that commitment to hard work, we're seeing the success of the American auto industry. 

And one of the things that the President wants to do is, as we make policy decisions moving forward, he wants to figure out what other policies can we put in place that will allow those middle-class workers to continue to succeed.  And it's his view that that's not just good for those middle-class families, it's also good for our broader economy.  And the auto industry serves as a useful illustration of that fact.  And so I think that's what we're trying to convey here.

There are obviously some other very important events happening in the world, but I do hope that this is a useful opportunity for us to highlight the momentum of the American economy, to remind people that some of that is thanks in part to difficult decisions that the President made early on, but that should give us some confidence in the fact that the President’s ideas for further strengthening the middle class and further supporting middle-class workers are worthy of advancement. 

And I just think that we'll have the opportunity to debate this quite a bit in the weeks and months ahead, but that's a debate that we're looking forward to.   

Q    What do you say to the Democrats in Congress and elsewhere in the base who feel like the trade agreement talk is undercutting that kind of industrial approach that you're talking about and will hurt the Michigan economy and other parts of the economy long term?

MR. EARNEST:  This is a concern that was raised by some as the President was seeking to finalize the Korea Free Trade Agreement.  And the President vowed in hammering out that agreement to make sure that we would reach an agreement that was in the best interests of American workers and the best interests of American businesses and in the best interests of American industry, including the American auto industry.

And again, that free trade agreement was ratified in 2011, I believe.  And so over the course of the three years we've seen that the auto industry has only gotten stronger over the course the course of that time.  So I think it's a pretty good indication that the President’s track record is strong when it comes to reaching the kinds of trade agreements that are in the best interests of American businesses, including the American auto industry.

As the President seeks to open up additional markets overseas to American businesses, we’re going to use the same guiding principle, and we’re going to make sure that whatever trade agreement that the President is able to reach is in the best interests of the American auto industry and in the best interests of American businesses.  And here’s the thing:  If presented with an agreement that doesn’t do that, then we won’t have a deal and the President won’t agree to it. 

So that's the only way we're going to get an agreement, is if we have terms that the President clearly believes are in the best interests of American businesses and American workers.  That’s the starting point.  That was true of the Korea Free Trade Agreement.  I think that is borne out and any additional trade agreements will be predicated on the same starting point.

Q    People in the auto industry argue that the Korea Trade Agreement has helped the Korean auto industry significantly more than the U.S. auto industry.  Is that something he’ll address?

MR. EARNEST:  I don’t think so.  I think the concern that a lot of people have, or at least that we’ve heard from the auto industry, is that additional -- by some in the auto industry -- is that trade deals with other countries are bad for American businesses.  And at least looking at the three years since that Korea Free Trade Agreement went into effect, it certainly hasn’t been true for the American auto industry because it’s only gotten stronger and more workers have been hired in that industry since that free trade agreement went into effect.

So I guess it’s difficult for me to analyze what impact the trade agreement had on the Korean auto industry, but I can say that, based on a pretty cursory review of the economic evidence, the impact on the American auto industry of the Korea Free Trade Agreement certainly wasn’t bad and there’s some evidence indicating it probably was pretty good.

Q    In terms of tomorrow’s announcement, the President’s change with FHA will of course result in less revenue for FHA from insurance premiums.  Why did he decide to do this now when the insurance fund there is still below its mandatory cushion?

MR. EARNEST:  It’s my understanding -- and we can check with HUD on this -- this is a fairly technical issue -- but my understanding of the issue is this -- is that in recent years, because of the recovering health of the housing sector that that cash reserve has been tapped a lot less, which means that in the last couple of years they’ve actually been able to make significant progress in building back up those cash reserves.  And because of the current trajectory of those reserves, the President believes that now is an appropriate time for us to reduce the contributions to those reserves. 

And what that will do is that will give a break to middle class -- responsible middle-class homeowners while we continue to make progress in building up those reserves.  So now is an appropriate time to make that change in the mind of the President in a way that will be really good for middle-class families and good for the housing sector -- that we’ve got some momentum built up finally in the housing sector. 

That was one of the lagging markets.  We saw the economy strengthen and make some pretty strong steps to strengthen over the last several years, but it’s more recently that we're  starting to see similar signs of strengthening in the housing sector.  And so we can build on that momentum, the President hopes, by taking this step.

Q    Thanks, Josh.

MR. EARNEST:  Thanks, everybody.

Q    Is there any chatter that you guys picked up ahead of time for the threat assessment or anything like that on the Paris attack?  Was there anything that -- I mean, we noticed Lisa Monaco was at the White House yesterday.  Defense Secretary Hagel was there yesterday.  Was there any indication that there was any sort of threat that you guys were worried about?

MR. EARNEST:  I can tell you that -- well, I think what I’d do is I’d refer you to the intelligence community on that.  They can give you the best sense of the threat assessment both leading up to today’s tragic terrorist attack but also in the aftermath as well.

Q    Just going back to the auto industry for a second.  One of the things the President said was, that ship has sailed, I believe were his words, on the TPP and moving forward with trade. I didn’t quite hear your answer on that.  Could you just one more time go over sort of -- will he be saying anything about the TPP to the autoworkers today?  Will he be discussing that?

MR. EARNEST:  I'll give you the short version, which is that the President has been very clear that any sort of trade agreement he reaches will be one that he believes is in the best interests of American businesses and American workers. 

This was a commitment that he made in advance of the Korea Free Trade Agreement.  And since the Korea Free Trade Agreement was announced, we’ve only seen the American auto industry continue to strengthen.  And so any sort of future agreement that the President reaches on trade would be predicated on the same core principle that we’re only going to cut a deal that is clearly in the best interests of American workers, American businesses, and American farmers. 

And if presented with an agreement that the President does not believe is in the best interest of the American auto industry and other important American manufacturing -- the American manufacturing sector or other core sectors of the American economy, the President simply won’t make the deal, that we’re only going to have an agreement that the President believes is clearly in the best interests of American workers and American businesses.

Q    Thanks, Josh.  Appreciate it.

END
2:34 P.M. EST