The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event -- Portland Museum of Art, Portland, ME

Portland Museum of Art
Portland, Maine

7:04 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Thank you.  Everybody, please have a seat.  Have a seat. 

Well, first of all, you want Karen and Bonnie having your back because you can tell that they're not going to take no for an answer.  (Laughter.)  It is just a thrill to be here.  I want to thank both of them.  I also want to thank Bobby and Rob, because, like me, they don't shine quite as brightly as their spouses.  (Laughter.)  But nevertheless, we are extremely fortunate to be improving our gene pool because of who we married.

A couple of other people I just want to acknowledge.  First of all, your outstanding members of Congress -- Chellie Pingree is here.  (Applause.)  Somebody who always is fighting for working people -- Mike Michaud is here.  (Applause.)  One of the true statesmen in the history of American politics –- George Mitchell is here.  (Applause.)  Your former Governor -- John Baldacci is here.  (Applause.)  And one of the best SBA Administrators of all time -- Karen Mills is in the house.  (Applause.)

Now, I will confess that part of the reason I came here was Michelle just had too good a time.  (Laughter.)  She came up here, and she came back, and she was all, “Oh, we had so much fun, and everybody was so nice, and they all thought I was so much better than you, and” –- (laughter) -- and I said, “Hold on, time out, time out.”  (Laughter.)  I said, “I got to get up there, too.” 

I should point out, by the way, that during Michelle's birthday, I did the same thing -- I brought a birthday cake and a check.  (Laughter.)  So that's where they got the idea.  (Laughter.)

I could not be more grateful to all of you for just the extraordinary reception and hospitality.  There are a lot of you who were involved in 2008, and a lot of you who have signed up for a second tour of duty here.  And it's truly moving to me, and every time I've come to Maine, we have had this extraordinary reception.  And people I think have not just been supportive financially, but more importantly, through organizing and knocking on doors and making phone calls, which has obviously been the hallmark of all our effort and dates back to my own history in politics.

I'm going to speak very briefly at the top, because I want to save a lot of time for questions and answers and comments and advice.  (Laughter.) 

We've gone through a tough three years, this country -- as tough as any in our lifetime.  The worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.  The economic aftermath that left millions without work.  A collapsed housing market.  It's hard to remember sometimes how perilous things were when I was sworn in.  The month I was sworn into office, we lost 800,000 jobs in that month alone.  We had lost almost 4 million in the months before I took office.  And then we would just keep on shedding jobs for the first few months that I was sworn in.  The banks were locked up, so even blue-chip companies couldn't get credit.  People, I think, genuinely thought that you might see a world financial meltdown.  And nobody exactly knew where the bottom was.  The stock market, by the way, was about half of what it is today.

And that meant we had to move fast to save the auto industry, to get the banks lending again, to make sure that state governments and local governments didn't have to lay off even more teachers and first responders and others that were providing vital services but, frankly, the states and local governments were having trouble being able to afford.

And we moved so fast that in some ways, people didn't fully appreciate the scope and magnitude of what got done in those first six months, that first year.  Here's the good news -- as you look back, from where we were to where we are now, over the last two years we've created almost 4 million jobs.  We have the strongest manufacturing job growth since the 1990s.  The auto industry is back, stronger than it was before.  GM is once again the number-one auto company in the world, making profits that are higher than at any time in its 100-year history.  We have seen the unemployment rate start ticking down.  We're seeing companies hiring again, companies investing again.  There's a sense that things have stabilized, and that we can start getting back to where we were before this terrible storm. 

But here's the thing.  I ran for office not just to get back to the status quo; I ran for office -- I ran for this office because we had not tended to a set of challenges that had been building up for decades.  And that's why even as we were trying to right the ship and yank ourselves out of a potential depression, we did not take our eye off the commitments that I had made to you when I ran for office.

And that's why we fulfilled pledges to end “don't ask, don't tell,” or to sign the Lilly Ledbetter Act that ensures equal pay for equal work.  That's why we followed through on commitments to invest in clean energy, and doubled fuel-efficiency standards on cars -- and trucks -- in an unprecedented fashion. 

That's why we followed through on the commitment I made to make sure that people don't go bankrupt when they get sick and passed the Affordable Care Act.  And already you've got 2.5 million young people who have health insurance because of it.  (Applause.)  And already, everybody here who has insurance has protections that are more robust than the patient's bill of rights that had been debated in the 1990s and that had never gotten done.  And seniors are benefiting from lower prescription drugs because of it.  And small businesses are getting subsidies so that they can provide health insurance to their workers. 

That's why we followed through and ended the war in Iraq.  That's why we followed through and targeted al Qaeda.  (Applause.)  That's why, with Osama bin Laden gone and al Qaeda weakened, we've been able to start ramping down our involvement in Afghanistan and provide transition, so that Afghans can take control of their own country.  That's why we ended torture, and we put our fight against terrorism on a legal footing.  And that's why we worked to restore our respect around the world.

So in addition to trying to stabilize the economy, we've tried to deal with issues like energy and health care and education, where we've made more strides in terms of reforming the system than probably the previous 30 years just in the last three; making sure that college is more affordable.  We've been focused on those things because those are the foundations for long-term growth, long-term sustainable growth that is inclusive, that says everybody gets a fair shot and everybody does their fair share and everybody plays by the same set of rules. 
Now, in some ways, this election, then, becomes more important than 2008 -- not only to preserve the gains that had been made, but also to finish the task that we set ourselves -- that we set for ourselves in 2008.  Because we still have more work to do.  We still have too many folks who are unemployed, which means that we've got to make sure that we've got a tax code that's incentivizing investment here in the United States, and we're enforcing our trade laws so that there's a level playing field, and we're training our workers to make sure that they can compete in this 21st century globalized economy.

It means that we've got to sustain the work we've done making investments in research and development so that the breakthroughs in biotech or clean energy happen here in the United States.

It means that we have to preserve the gains we've made when it comes to respecting science.  (Applause.)  But it also means that when it comes to education, we've still got kids who are dropping out, unable to read, and they can't compete in this global economy.  So we're going to have to do more work there.

It means we've got to invest in infrastructure.  We used to have the best roads, the best bridges, the best rail lines.  We don't anymore.  And now is the time to rebuild America. 

We still have to do more when it comes to energy, because as much progress as we've made over the last few years, the fact of the matter is, is that we still are importing too much oil and our economy is still subject to the whims of what happens in the Middle East.  And our environment is still captive to our addiction to fossil fuels.

We've still got to reform an immigration system that's broken, because I believe we're a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants, and we can reconcile those two values -- make this country stronger because we continue to be a magnet for incredible talent from all around the world.

So the task before us still looms large.  And the other side doesn’t have answers to these questions.  You don't see them debating how we improve our education system.  You don't see them engaging in any serious way about how we're going to retrain our workers.  There's not a conversation about how we restore manufacturing in this country. 

They've got one message and that is, we're going to make sure that we cut people's taxes even more -- so that by every objective measure our deficit is worse and we will slash government investments that have made this country great, not because it's going to balance the budget, but because it's driven by our ideological vision about how government should be.  That's their agenda, pure and simple.

And so we probably have not seen an election where the contrast is that sharp between the two parties as in this election.  Keep in mind, when I ran in 2008, we had a Republican candidate who believed in climate change -- (laughter) -- who had worked on immigration reform, who had not ruled out the possibility that the wealthy might pay a little bit more as part of an overall package to reduce our deficit.  But that's not what we have right now. 

So there's a lot at stake.  But the good news is, as I travel around the country, part of what sustained me each and every day -- people sometimes ask, boy, you're working pretty long hours and people are calling you pretty nasty names, and how do you put up with all that?  And I tell them, in addition to having this remarkable family and having a rule of not watching television -- (laughter) -- what also sustains me is just the American people.  When you go out there and you meet them, they're resilient. They're tough.  They've got good sense.  They have strong values.

And although this is a big, messy democracy and politics has always been contentious in this country, my confidence in the American people is undiminished.  And my energy, my absolute certainty that we can be doing better, and that if we follow the course that America is going to be in a stronger position today than it was four years ago -- that determination is as strong as ever.

If you are just as determined, and you're willing to work just as hard as we did four years ago, then we're going to win.  And more importantly, we're going to make sure that this country is everything that it deserves to be. 

Thank you very much, everybody.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Thank you.  (Applause.)

END   
7:18 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event -- Southern Maine Community College - South Portland, ME

Southern Maine Community College
South Portland, Maine

5:08 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, Maine!  (Applause.)  Thank you!  (Applause.)  Thank you very much.  (Applause.)

AUDIENCE:  Four more years!  Four more years!

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, it is good to be in South Portland, Maine!  (Applause.)

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  I love you?

THE PRESIDENT:  I love you!  (Applause.)  Thank you.  It is wonderful to be here. 

First of all, can everybody please give Richard a big round of applause for that great introduction.  (Applause.)  A couple other people I want to acknowledge -- first of all, your outstanding Congresswoman, Chellie Pingree, is here.  (Applause.)  One of the great statesmen of our time, Senator George Mitchell, in the house.  (Applause.)  From nearby Portland, Mayor Michael Brennan is here.  (Applause.)  And the Maine Finance Committee and everybody who helped put this together -- what a wonderful event.  And whoever arranged for the great weather, good job.  (Laughter.)  You know, the last time I was in Maine it was snowing -- (laughter) -- not surprisingly, and I love snow but this is good, too.

Now, let me say this, Maine.  I am here today not just because I need your help.  I’m here because the country needs your help.  (Applause.)  A lot of you worked really hard in 2008 in our campaign.  And the reason you worked so hard wasn’t because you thought it was going to be a cakewalk.  When you decide to support a presidential candidate named Barack Hussein Obama -- (laughter) -- then you know that this is not a sure thing.  (Laughter.)   

The reason you guys worked so hard wasn’t just because of me.  It was because you shared a vision about what America is all about.  You shared a vision about who we are as a people.  (Applause.)  And that vision -- that vision said that we don’t just leave people to fend for themselves.  We don’t just let the powerful play by their own rules.  It was a vision of America where we’re all in it together.  Where everybody who works hard has the chance to get ahead -- no matter what they look like, no matter where they come from, not just those at the very top, but everybody -- that that was the recipe for American success. 

That was the vision that we shared.  That was the change we believed in.  We knew it wouldn’t come easy.  We knew it wouldn’t be quick.  But when you think back over the last three years, I want you to know that because of what you did in 2008, we’ve begun to see what change looks like.  We’ve begun to see it.  (Applause.)  We've begun to see it.

Change is the first bill I signed into law -- a law that says a woman deserves an equal day’s pay for an equal day’s work.  (Applause.)  That’s the kind of change we believed in.  

Change is the decision that we made to rescue the American auto industry.  There were a million jobs at stake.  There were those who said let Detroit go bankrupt.  We didn’t do it, and today GM is back on top as the world’s number-one automaker.  (Applause.)  And Detroit has never made better cars than it does today.  (Applause.)  With more than 200,000 new jobs over the last two and a half years, the American auto industry is back. And they’re making better cars, and more fuel-efficient cars than ever before.  (Applause.)  That’s what change is. 

Change is the decision that we made to stop waiting for Congress to do something about our oil addiction and finally raise fuel-efficiency standards on cars.  And by the middle of the next decade, we’re going to be driving American-made cars that get almost 55 miles a gallon, and that will save the typical family $8,000 at the pump over time.  (Applause.)  That’s what change is.  (Applause.)  That happened because of you.

Change is the fight that we won to have $60 billion stop going to banks and instead go to lower interest rates for student loans and more help on Pell grants, so that our young people can get the college education that they need to compete in the 21st century.  (Applause.)  That’s what change is. 

And, yes, Maine, change is the health care reform that we passed after a century of trying -- (applause) -- because we believe that in America, in this great country of ours, nobody should go bankrupt just because they get sick.  And as a consequence of what you did, 2.5 million young people have health insurance now that didn’t have it before because they’re staying on their parent's plans.  (Applause.)  Millions of seniors are now paying less for prescription drugs.  Insurance companies can’t deny you coverage right at the time when you need it.  (Applause.)  People are getting preventive care that they weren’t getting before.  (Applause.)  We’re going to make sure the people with preexisting conditions are finally able to get coverage.  That’s what change is.  That happened because of what you guys did in 2008.  (Applause.)

Change is the fact that for the first time in history, you don’t have to hide who you love in order to serve the country that you love.  We ended “don’t ask, don’t tell."  Ended it.  (Applause.)

And change is keeping another promise I made in 2008 -- for the first time in nine years, we don’t have any Americans fighting in Iraq.  (Applause.)  We refocused our efforts on the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11.  And thanks to our brave men and women in uniform, al Qaeda is weaker than ever before and and Osama bin Laden is no more.  We’ve begun to transition in Afghanistan to put them into the lead.  We are starting to bring our troops home.  That’s what change is.  That happened because of you.  (Applause.)

Now, Maine, none of this has been easy.  And if you notice, we haven’t gotten a lot of help from the other side.  (Laughter.)  We’ve still got more work to do.  I was listening to Richard tell his story and he’s absolutely right -- that determination, that willingness to do whatever it takes, understanding that a job is not just a matter of money, it’s also a matter of dignity and purpose and contributing to this country -- that spirit of Richard’s, that exists all across America. 

But there are still a lot of folks who are still looking for work.  We went through the worst financial crisis and the worst economic crisis in our lifetimes.  And although we’re starting to make progress, we still have too many families that are having trouble making the bills, too many folks still out of work.  We’re still recovering from this incredible storm. 

But here’s the good news.  Over the last two years, businesses have added nearly 4 million new jobs.  (Applause.)   Our manufacturers are creating jobs for the first time since the ‘90s.  Our economy is getting stronger.  The recovery is accelerating.  And that means the last thing we can afford to do right now is to go back to the very same policies that got us into this mess in the first place.  (Applause.)  Right?

But, of course, that’s exactly what the other side -- all those folks who are running for this office -- that’s exactly what they’re proposing.  They don’t make any secret about it.  They want to go back to the days when Wall Street played by its own rules.  They want to roll back health care so that insurance companies can jack up your rates or whatever they want.  They want to continue to spend trillions of dollars more on tax breaks for the wealthiest individuals, even if it means adding to the deficit, even if it means gutting things like education, and basic research, and clean energy and Medicare -- all those things that help this economy grow. 

Their philosophy is simple:  You’re on your own.  That’s their view -- that the only way the economy can grow is if -- if you’re out of a job, tough luck, figure it out on your own.  If you don’t have health care, too bad, you’re on your own.  If you’re a senior having trouble paying your prescription drugs that’s not our problem.  If you’re a young person coming out of poverty, pull yourself up by your own bootstraps, even if you don’t have boots.  (Laughter.)  That’s their vision. 

And by the way, if you look at their budget that the Republicans in the House of Representatives just passed, it’s no exaggeration -- they would gut things that we’ve always believed were the core of making America great:  education, basic research in science, caring for the most vulnerable. 

They are wrong.  They are wrong in their vision of America.  (Applause.)  In the United States of America, we are greater on our own -- we are great together than we are on our own.  (Applause.)  In the United States of America, we believe in the basic promise that if you work hard, you can do well enough to raise your family and own a home, and send your kids to college and put a little away for retirement.

That’s the choice in this election -- different visions of America.  This is not just about another political debate.  This is the defining issue of our time at a make-or-break moment for the middle class in this country.  Who is going to be fighting for you -- that’s what this is about.  (Applause.) 

We can't go back --

AUDIENCE:  Four more years!  Four more years!  Four more years!

THE PRESIDENT:  We can go back to what they’re offering -- an economy built on outsourcing and phony debt and phony financial profits.

AUDIENCE:  No!

THE PRESIDENT:  Or we can fight for an economy that works for everybody -- an economy that’s built to last, an economy built on American manufacturing and American science and American energy and American education that makes sure our kids have the skills they need.  And the values that have always made this country great:  Hard work.  Everybody having a fair shot.  Everybody doing their fair share.  Everybody operating under the same set of rules.  Shared responsibility.  That’s what we’re fighting for.  That’s the kind of America we need to build.  (Applause.)  

I don’t know about you, but I think we need to make sure the next generation of manufacturing, for example, takes root not in Asia, not in Europe.  I want it to take place right here in Maine.  (Applause.)  I want it to take place in factories in Detroit and Pittsburgh and Cleveland.  I don’t want this nation to be known just for buying and consuming things.  I want it to be known for producing and inventing and selling stuff.  That’s how America was built.  That’s the kind of economy we’ve got to get back to.  (Applause.)  

And that’s why it’s time to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas.  Let’s start rewarding companies that create jobs right here in America.  Let’s give them tax breaks.  (Applause.)

I want to make our schools the envy of the world.  And we start to do that -- not only are we putting more money into education, but we’re also insisting on reform.  And that starts with the man or woman at the front of the classroom.  A good teacher can increase the lifetime earnings of a classroom by $250,000.  (Applause.)  A great teacher can inspire a kid who's trapped in poverty, trapped in their own circumstances, to shoot for something higher, to dream big. 

So I don’t want to hear folks in Washington just bashing teachers.  I don’t want them defending the status quo.  Let’s give schools the resources they need to hire good teachers and reward great teachers.  (Applause.)  Let’s give schools the flexibility they need to teach with creativity and passion.  We can stop teaching to the test.  Replace teachers who aren’t doing the job, but let’s give them the power they need to inspire their students.  (Applause.) 

When kids do graduate, right now they’re having trouble financing their college educations.  When Americans owe more in tuition debt than credit card debt, you know that’s a problem.  And that’s why -- coming up in July, by the way, if Congress doesn’t do anything, the interest rates on student loans are going to go up, they’re going to double.

AUDIENCE:  No!

THE PRESIDENT:  That’s a bad idea, which is why I’ve said, Congress, let’s get moving.  Now, they haven’t done it yet.  So you guys need to make sure that everybody understands how important this is.  And colleges and universities, they’ve got to do their part keeping tuition down.  Because higher education can’t be a luxury -- it is an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford.  (Applause.) 

An economy built to last is one where we support scientists and research and science.  (Applause.)  Whether it’s stem cell research or climate change, we want to make sure that the great medical breakthroughs happen here in the United States and that happens because we finance research.  We want to make sure that the next breakthroughs in clean energy happen here in the United States.  That happens because we support clean energy.  (Applause.)  

We have -- we’ve subsidized oil companies for 100 years.  And I think they’re doing pretty good, last I checked.  Every time you fill up a tank, they’re doing just fine.  So I think it’s time to end 100 years of taxpayer giveaways to an industry that’s never been more profitable.  (Applause.)  Let’s double down on the clean energy industry that’s never been more promising -- solar power and wind power, biofuels.  (Applause.)  

And let’s rebuild America.  We’re a nation of builders.  You go to other countries, they’ve got newer airports, better rail lines.  That’s not who -- America always had the best stuff.  (Laughter.)  I want to make sure that our businesses have access to the newest roads and airports, and the fastest railroads and Internet access for everybody.  It’s time for us to stop -- look, let’s take the money that we’re no longer spending at war, use half of it to pay down our debt, use the other half to do some nation-building here at home.  What do you think, Maine?  I think it’s time.  (Applause.)

And when it comes to our deficit, when it comes to our fiscal situation, let’s have a tax system that reflects everybody doing their fair share.  (Applause.)  Doing their fair share.  Some of you know I’ve proposed something called the Buffett Rule.  It’s a pretty simple rule that Warren Buffett happens to endorse:  If you make more than $1 million a year -- I don’t mean that you have $1 million, I mean every year you’re making more than $1 million -- you should not pay a tax rate that’s lower than your secretary’s, which is what is happening for too many folks right now.  (Applause.) 

What I’ve said is, if you make $250,000 a year or less -- like 98 percent of American families, then your taxes don’t need to go up.  Folks are still struggling.  But if you’re doing really well, you can do a little bit more.  (Applause.)  And when I say this, look, this is not class warfare, it’s not class envy.  This is just basic math.  (Laughter.)  Because if somebody like me gets a tax break that I don’t need and the country can’t afford, then one of two things is going to happen.  Either it adds to our deficit, or it takes something away from somebody else –- that veteran who needs services for his PTSD after he served our country; that student that’s trying to afford getting their college degree; that senior who's already having a tough time paying for their prescription drugs.  (Applause.)  

Why would we set up a system where I don’t do anything and somebody who's in a tougher position has to bear the entire burden?  That’s not right.  That’s not who we are.

You know, I hear some of these other folks, some of these politicians talking about values during an election year.  Well, let me tell you about values.  Hard work is a value.  Personal responsibility is a value.  Looking out for one another is a value.  (Applause.)  The idea that I’m my brother’s keeper, my sister’s keeper -- that’s a value.  (Applause.)  

You and me, all of us, we’re here just because somebody, somewhere, at some point, felt a responsibility not just to themselves, not even just to their own families, but they felt a responsibility to our fellow citizens, to our country’s future. 
I think about my own background.  Somebody had the foresight to say, let’s help people finance their college educations, and that’s why my mother, a single mom, was able to get her degree even after she had me. 

I think about -- when you listen to Michelle talk about growing up, her and her brother -- her dad, a blue-collar worker; her mom stayed at home and then went to work as a secretary; neither of them had a college degree.  But Michelle talks about how there were always like after-school programs and sports programs and activities for kids -- because somebody thought, you know what, let’s make an investment in these kids so that they might have that ladder to opportunity -- because that’s how all of America grows.  

Everybody here has a story like that.  If it’s not you, then it’s your grandparents or your great-grandparents.  We all have benefited because we didn’t just think narrowly about the here and now and me; we thought about the future and us.  (Applause.) 

This is about what we can do together.  We won’t win the race for new jobs and new businesses and middle-class security if we cling to this same old, worn-out, tired, you’re-on-your-own economics that the other side is peddling.  I mean, they act like we haven’t tried it.  We tried it.  (Laughter.)  It was tried in the decades before the Great Depression -- it didn’t work then.  It was tried in the last decade -- it didn’t work. 

The idea that you would keep on doing the same thing over and over again, even though it's been proven not to work -- that’s a sign of madness. (Laughter and applause.)  We’ve got to take this in a different direction.  (Applause.) 


And we know that from our own experience.  Look, if we attract an outstanding young person to go into teaching because we’re paying them well, we’re giving them support, professional development, and they go on to teach the next Steve Jobs, that’s good for all of us.  If we provide faster Internet service to some rural part of Maine and there’s some small business out there that suddenly has access to a worldwide market, that’s good for the entire economy.  If we build a new bridge that saves a shipping company time and money, well, workers and customers all over the country, they benefit.  

And by the way, this has never been a Democratic or a Republican idea.  The first Republican President, Lincoln, during -- in the middle of a civil war, he made investments in helping to forge the Transcontinental Railroad, and started the American Academy of Sciences, and land-grant colleges -- because he wasn’t just thinking about now, he was thinking about the greatness of this country in the future.  Teddy Roosevelt called for a progressive income tax -- a Republican.  Dwight Eisenhower built the Interstate Highway System.  There were Republicans who helped FDR in Congress give millions of returning heroes, including my grandfather, the chance to go college on the G.I. Bill. 

So this is not a partisan idea.  This is an American idea.  (Applause.)  And that same sense of common purpose exists today.  It’s alive and well -- maybe not in Washington -- (laughter) -- but here in Maine, all across America, on Main Streets and town halls, when you talk to our men and women in uniform, and you go to folks’ places of worship, they understand this. 

Our politics may be divided.  But most Americans still understand that we’ve got a stake in each other.  We’re greater together.  It doesn’t matter what you look like, where you come from, we rise or fall as one nation, and one people.  And that’s what’s at stake right now.  That’s what this election is about.  (Applause.)  

I know it has been a tough few years.  And for all the changes we’ve made, there are times where folks have gotten frustrated or discouraged -- say, things are so tough in Washington, so dysfunctional.  Things just aren’t happening as fast as they need to.  And so it’s understandable, it’s tempting for some folks to just say, you know what, maybe the change we believed in is impossible.  But I want to remind you, during the campaign I warned you this was going to be hard.  Big change is hard.  It takes time.  It takes more than a year.  It takes more than a single term.  It takes more than a single President.

What it really requires is a committed citizenry who are willing to keep fighting and pushing, inching this closer -- inching this country closer and closer to its highest ideals.  (Applause.)  

Michelle will tell you I’m not a perfect man.  (Laughter.)    And I said that I wouldn’t be a perfect President.  But I made a promise in 2008 -- I said I’d always tell you what I think, I’d always tell you where I stood.  And I said that I’d wake up every single day, fighting as hard as I know how for you.  And I have kept that promise.  (Applause.)  I’ve kept that promise.
I have kept that promise. 

And so if you’re willing to keep pushing with me and keep fighting with me, keep reaching for that vision that we believed in, then I promise you we won’t just win another election, but we will finish what we started in 2008.  (Applause.)  And this country will be better for it.  And we will remind the world just why it is that the United States of America is the greatest nation on Earth.  (Applause.)  

Thank you, everybody.  God bless you.  God bless the United States of America.  (Applause.)

END               
5:57 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Background Conference Call on Presidential Determination Required Pursuant to Section 1245 of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act

Via Conference Call

2:25 P.M. EDT

MR. VIETOR:  Hey, everybody, thanks for getting on.  We are doing a call, as the advisory said, to talk about the section of the NDAA that has to do with Iran sanctions.  You should have the determination from us -- and now we're going to do a background call as senior administration officials to walk people through what that means and what it says.

And so I'm going to hand it over to our first administration official.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Good afternoon, everybody. Thanks for getting on the call.  I'll just give you a little bit of background and then hand it over to my colleagues here. 

Since the beginning of this administration there's been a concerted effort to ratchet up pressure on the Iranian government in pursuit of our objective of preventing them from acquiring a nuclear weapon, and compelling them to come into compliance with their international obligations.  In pursuit of that goal we've pursued a set of unprecedented sanctions, first through the United Nations Security Council, then through follow-on unilateral actions and actions with likeminded partners.

You will recall that in December of last year the National Defense Authorization Act was passed by both the House and the Senate and signed into law by the President.  The NDAA included a provision related to the sanctioning of the Central Bank of Iran. And I'd note that the Iran sanction provisions targeting the Central Bank of Iran passed the Senate 100 to nothing -- so there was overwhelming bipartisan support for this additional action against Iran and its Central Bank. 

The law also contained a number of deadlines for the executive branch, and we have been working through the implementation of the NDAA since December 31st, according to those deadlines. 

Specifically, the sanctions were split into two pieces.  The first dealt with non-oil transactions between private foreign financial institutions and the Central Bank of Iran.  And those sanctions began to take hold on February 29th.  The second deals with oil-related transactions between any foreign financial institutions and the Central Bank of Iran.  These transactions become sanctionable on June 28th.

However, in order for the second set of sanctions to be activated, the President was required in the law to determine the availability of non-Iranian oil supplies within 90 days of enactment.  And then the President has the ability going forward to continue to make that determination.  So today is the deadline for the first determination by the President as to going forward with those sanctions against oil-related transactions in the Central Bank of Iran.

The President signed the determination today after evaluating all the relevant facts and data, and determined that he would go forward with those sanctions of oil-related transactions. 

I'd also note we've been in a steady and consistent dialogue with all of our international partners on this issue over the course of the last several months as a part of our concerted effort to implement these sanctions in a responsible way that effectively targets the Iranian government while mitigating other effects.  And to that end, we have issued exemptions for a number of countries that have cooperated with us in reducing their purchases and reliance on Iranian crude oil -- notably the exemptions issued by the Secretary of State for the European Union and Japan within the last two weeks. 

And with that, I will turn it over to my colleague to talk a little bit about the process by which the President made this particular decision, and then we'll take your questions.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Thank you.  There will be some additional background that will accompany the President's determination that will be coming out to you all shortly.  But just in summary, the President made this determination after close and careful consideration of a variety of factors and analyzing the market.  He looked at a variety of different data, a variety of different factors, including the report that the Energy Information Administration submitted to Congress on February 29th, which was required under the statute, which provided a picture of the current oil markets and, in particular, non-Iranian supply and demand.

The President also looked closely at current global economic conditions; in addition, increased production of oil by a number of countries, including, importantly, here in the United States; and also looked at the level of inventories and spare oil production capacity globally; and finally, the existence of strategic reserves.  And so the decision and the determination that my colleague pointed to was made based on a consideration of all of those factors together.

He also, I would note, in the determination made clear that he will continue to monitor closely developments in the oil market, including these factors that I just discussed -- supply-demand inventory, spare capacity, strategic reserves -- in order to assure that going forward the markets continue -- can continue to accommodate reduction in purchases from Iran.

So that's some context on how this decision was made.  And I think we could now open it up to questions.

Q    Thanks, guys, for doing the call, and thank you for your service.  I know that the law specifies that countries can be exempted if they significantly reduce their dependence on Iranian petroleum.  But we don't know what "significantly reduce" means, so I'm wondering if you could help us understand what do countries have to do to significantly reduce in order to be eligible for such an exemption? 

And also, during the congressional debate over this law the administration was very public about its opinion.  I'm wondering if now you can tell us a little bit about your opinion on the current Johnson-Shelby Iran sanctions bill that's pending before the Senate.  Do you support that bill and do you support senators' rights to offer amendments to that bill?  Thank you.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Thanks for the question.  First of all, I'd note that we have already pursued those exceptions for the European Union and Japan, given the strong commitment that they've demonstrated to reduce their purchases of Iranian crude oil, and noting in particular the EU oil embargo that is set to come into force this summer. 

And it's our belief that these sanctions are having a significant impact on the Iranian government and the Iranian economy, and that therefore, they present the strongest pressure we have in place to date to affect Iran's political calculus about the pursuit of a nuclear program, particularly as we move into P5-plus-1 negotiation.

In terms of going forward, we're continuing to consult with other countries about their potential reduction in the purchasing of Iranian crude oil.  In terms of the determinations we make, the purchases of Iranian crude oil for each country are closely examined by experts from a range of government agencies, including the State Department, the Energy Department, and the Treasury Department.  And then we make an assessment based upon the overall trends in terms of purchases of Iranian crude oil, the actions that host governments and the private sector have made in different countries, as well as future commitments by these countries.

So I think we've been very transparent in our dialogue with countries around the world about the steps that they can take to pursue that type of exemption.  Again, we've already issued some for the EU and Japan and are continuing to consult with other countries about the steps that they're taking.  And we look at a broad picture that includes steps that have been taken, future commitments to pursue reduction and, again, the role that each country can play in bringing pressure to bear on the Iranian government.

And frankly, this conversation is focused on the fact that the international community broadly has an interest in Iran coming into compliance of its international obligations and preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.  So many of these countries have been our partners in enforcing sanctions in the past and have demonstrated an interest in cooperating with us and taking this additional step going forward. 

And each day, I think, really we see a number of positive indicators from a broad range of countries.  Just today, you saw, for instance, a positive indication from Turkey about their interest in reducing their purchases of Iranian crude oil as well.

And on your second question, we have not made specific determinations with regard to that amendment, so we wouldn't have any comment to offer.

Q    Do you have any opinion at all on the Johnson-Shelby bill?  You’re for it, you’re against it?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  We’re just not taking a position on the particular bill at this point.

Q    I’m curious if you’ve taken into consideration, or how you predict this would impact global oil prices. 

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Global oil prices are set by a variety of factors, many of which are outside of the control of U.S. policy.  And as the President has talked about on several occasions, factors that are influencing oil prices right now include growth in countries around the world as well as disruptions in supply in countries across the globe from Sudan to Yemen to Nigeria.  And we are monitoring the global oil markets and all of those developments quite closely. 

I think that when making this determination, we looked closely at the Energy Information Administration’s report, which they put out on February 29th, which provided some insight into the state of the market and, in particular, the state of the market when you look at the supply-and-demand factors outside of Iranian exports.  And what that report found was that there is tightness in the market and that tightness remains, but nonetheless, there also appears to be sufficient supply of non-Iranian oil such that foreign countries can significantly reduce their imports of Iranian oil. 

And that, again, takes into account other factors like increased production that we are seeing in Iraq, in Libya, and again, importantly, in the United States, where we have made notable progress in increasing domestic oil production not only over the last couple of years, but, importantly, if you look out into the future, projected oil production in the United States is on the rise as well.  And that’s obviously an important priority domestically for our economic security and our energy security, but it’s also a factor in global oil markets as well. 

So I think the President has been clear that part of the reason why we need an all-of-the-above energy strategy, part of the reason why he's been talking about all of the measures we are implementing here at home, from production to historic increases in fuel efficiency of our vehicles, is because global oil prices are set in a global market.  They are affected by a variety of different factors, and as a result we need to focus on the steps we can to increase our economy’s security against that. 

But with respect to this specific decision here, I think we -- the President made it by taking into an account a variety of these different factors.

Q    So may I just follow -- sorry -- in a layperson’s terms, prices -- as a result of this, prices may go up in the short term, but over the long term, you think it will even out.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  No.  No, I don’t think that that would be correct.  I would -- I’m not going to speculate about oil prices and how they move, in part because global oil prices are set in a global market and are affected by a variety of different factors, including the ones that I just touched on. 
This decision today is part of a pretty deliberate and well-understood process of implementing the sanctions regime that went into place at the end of last year.  As my colleague pointed out earlier in the call, that process has a number of specific benchmarks, all of which are well understood. 

And overall, we remain focused, as we have been for some time now, on implementing these sanctions in a way that is responsible and focuses on what is the ultimate goal, which is to compel the Iranians to the table. 

And so I think that -- I’m not going to speculate about particular movements in global oil prices.  I don’t think you’ll ever hear us doing that.  But I don’t think that your -- I think your assessment is off.  I think that the people understand that this is part of a pretty-well-understood implementation of our regime.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Jessica, just to reinforce that point, the law passed in December, and since then we’ve made it perfectly clear that we were intent on pursuing sanctions against Iranian petroleum.  That’s why we’ve been going all over the world, talking to countries about the need for them to reduce their reliance on Iranian oil.  So I think this is simply the next phase in a policy that was put in place in December with overwhelming bipartisan support, and that we’ve been very transparent about our intent to pursue.

Q    Hey, guys.  So the U.S. State Department announced last week that 11 of the 23 countries that we believe to import Iranian oil are exempt.  Now, of those other 23, there’s India, China and South Korea.  Where do our discussions stand with them? And was this talked about while the President was in South Korea last week?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Again, to be specific, the Secretary of State gave exceptions to the implementation of the sanctions to those 11 countries, the EU and Japan.  However, going forward, we also made clear that we were going to continue our discussions with other countries and that other countries still had the opportunity to take steps in order to gain exception. 

This was a topic of discussion in a number of the President’s meetings.  You referenced, for instance, South Korea. We think we’ve had constructive discussions with the South Koreans about steps that they could take to reduce their reliance on Iranian crude oil.  They’ve indicated an interest in doing so. So we’ll have an ongoing dialogue with them.  In the past, the South Koreans have been strong partners in the implementation of sanctions.  So South Korea, for instance, we expect to continue to make progress with in our discussions.

Similarly today, just to cite another example that I referenced earlier, Turkey indicated that even as they have a significant reliance on Iranian imports --- or imports of Iranian crude oil, they indicated an interest in pursuing reductions.

And so this is an ongoing dialogue with a range of countries.  What we want to do is build the broadest coalition that we can to apply pressure on the Iranian government while also implementing these sanctions in a responsible way that takes into account the need to maintain broad international support and mitigate impacts on the global economy, and that’s exactly what we’ve done and will continue to do. 

So those 11 are not the final list of countries that may gain exceptions, and we’re going to continue to discuss with other countries ways in which they can reduce their reliance on Iranian crude oil and join a growing coalition of nations that are pressuring Iran to the table.

Q    As a follow up, without India and China, how significant are these sanctions then?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Extraordinarily significant.  I think you’ve seen, first of all, a tremendous impact on the Iranian economy and the Iranian currency -- far beyond, I think, anything that people anticipated a year or two years ago -- in terms of the impact on economic growth in Iran, the impact on their revenue that the government has access to, and the impact on the Iranian currency, which has suffered greatly because of these sanctions and the specter of additional sanctions.

Europe is one of the overwhelming destinations for Iranian exports of crude oil.  And the EU oil embargo, in that regard, is going to be critically important in ratcheting up the pressure on the Iranian government.  So at the same time that these sanctions come into force June 28th is roughly concurrent to one that the EU oil embargo is going to come into force.  And at that point, we really do believe that Iran will face a degree of pressure that is above and beyond anything that it has ever experienced before with regard to sanctions.

I think India and China are two countries that we continue to have a dialogue with about their ability to reduce reliance on Iranian oil.  I would note that while we continue to pursue reductions, what we also have not seen is, for instance, backfilling by the Chinese, whereby they make up the difference in Iranian oil that has come off the market in other places by increasing their economic relationship with Iran.  And so that cooperation has been -- in terms of maintaining a baseline of pressure -- very important. 

So the impact is great.  It’s increasing, particularly with the EU oil embargo and these sanctions coming into force.  And we’ll continue to talk to the Indians, the Chinese and other countries about tightening that squeeze on the Iranian government.

Q    Hi, thanks for taking my call.  Earlier this week, there was a panel of oil experts testifying before the Senate Energy Committee, and all of them agreed to one extent or another that the Iran sanctions and the concern over the eventual impact they will have were playing a huge role in driving the global price of oil.  A lot of them mentioned, too, that the increase in production by the Saudis would shrink the spare capacity that the country has.  So is the White House going to be flexible as it moves forward, if it does, in fact, see any more dramatic increase in global prices, in either scaling back the sanctions or being more flexible with countries like China and India, where the dialogue is still going on?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Sure, I mean, I guess I would say two things in response to that.  The first is that I think that what you’ve seen from the administration to date has been a careful and reasoned strategy to implement these sanctions in a way that focuses them on the intended goal.  And I think that the exceptions that my colleague was just talking about and the process of consultation with international partners is evidence of that.

Second, in making this determination today, the President did make clear that he will continue to closely monitor the situation, he’ll continue to closely monitor the market, in order to determine that the environment is appropriate so that we can continue to accommodate a reduction in purchases from Iran. That’s an authority that the President retains under the statute and that he will continue to exercise going forward.

Q    The EIA’s report on February 29th talked about spare capacity being tight by historical standards.  And I’m just wondering, given that sort of tight cushion, what role you see strategic reserves playing, particularly United States -- the strategic reserves in the U.S. going forward.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  So as I mentioned at the top of the call, in making this consideration the President did look at a variety of factors including the assessment in that report, including inventory, spare oil production, capacity globally, and the existence of strategic reserves.  As you’ve heard the President say on numerous occasions, he is going to keep all options on the table and our strategic reserves are one of those options that will remain on the table as we go forward.

Obviously, with respect to any specific action, no decisions have been made.  And so we don’t have any comment on anything beyond that other than just to reinforce what the President has said, which is that this is a -- it’s an option that is and will remain on the table.

Q    So it says that there’s going to be significant reduction of oil imported from Iran.  Do you have a number or a percentage that we can gauge?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  So the way that that determination is made by the Secretary of State is something that my colleague spoke to a little bit earlier, but just to reinforce, that those decisions are made on a case-by-case basis. Obviously we’ve exercised the exceptions for significant reduction exceptions already for the EU 10 and Japan.  And in making those determinations, the administration looks at each circumstance, a variety of data both about trends to date, commitments made, and forward-looking commitments. 

And so that’s the approach by which we do this, and we think that it is an effective approach because as we’ve seen by the exceptions that have already been granted, we are commending and recognizing the steps of partners -- serious and significant steps that partners have already taken and that helps encourage other countries to do the same.

Q    Well, I guess what I’m trying to say is, what is the reduction of oil that the U.S. is going to see imported?  Does that make sense?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  The United States doesn’t import any Iranian oil, given existing U.S. sanctions.  However, in terms of Iranian oil on the market, clearly when you factor in an embargo in terms of EU purchases of Iranian crude oil together with the steps that Japan has taken -- another key destination for Iranian exports -- a significant amount of Iranian oil will no longer be purchased on the market, and thereby impacting the most significant source of revenue that the Iranian government has. 

So while we can’t put a specific percentage in terms of being predictive about the percentage of Iranian oil that comes off the market, when you factor in how much they sell to Europe, how much they sell to Japan, how much they sell to other countries who have indicated that they’re going to reduce imports, we know for certain that that’s going to have a huge impact on their revenues.  And, frankly, when you look at what has happened to their currency and their economy in recently months, clearly markets are beginning to make that determination themselves as well.

Q    Hey, thanks for doing the call.  I appreciate it.  Two questions.  You mentioned the factors that went into the President’s decision.  Can you be specific about what degree, if any, current American gas prices were a factor?  And also you’ve put a lot of emphasis on steps countries have taken and the countries that have received exemptions, and you’re hopeful that other countries will continue to take steps.  Can you just be clear, though, if it comes down to it in June, is the President fully prepared to levy sanctions on allies like South Korea?

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  I’ll take that second question first.  We are fully prepared to go forward with these sanctions, again, which -- sanction transactions with the Central Bank related to Iranian petroleum.  So this determination today I think makes clear that it’s the next step forward in the implementation of those sanctions and it was a step that was necessary for those sanctions to come into force at the end of June. 

I think our allies and partners all understand that.  We have been very transparent with them in our discussions about the fact that we are committed to moving forward with these.  Like I said, this is something that passed with overwhelming bipartisan support -- 100-to-nothing vote in the Senate -- and we’ve been very vocal about it ever since.  But we’re -- our preference is to work with countries so that they take steps to reduce their imports, thereby getting the type of exception that the European Union and Japan were granted by the Secretary of State. 

So that’s what we’re going to continue to pursue between now and July, because what would be the best outcome here is to see the broadest number of countries acting against the Iranian government, sending both a clear message to Iran that they should abandon the pursuit of nuclear weapons while also implementing the sanctions in a responsible way that mitigates adverse impacts to either the international coalition or the global economy.

I don't know if my colleague wants to take the first one.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Sure.  I guess I don’t want to sound like we’re giving you the same answer to every question, but in this particular case I think it goes back to the same answer that we’ve given, because at the end of the day, the price of gas here in the United States is set by oil prices, and oil prices are set on the global market. 

Obviously the President is very focused on the impact that high gas prices are having on American families, and he’s out there talking about that all the time and talking about measures that we are focused on as part of the all-of-the-above strategy. If you look at the determination that was made today, again the focus was on oil and whether there is sufficient supply to allow for a significant reduction.  And the factors that influence that decision are the factors that we laid out.

MR. VIETOR:  Thanks, everybody, for getting on.  If you have any follow-ups, please shoot me an email.  A reminder, that was background as senior administration officials.

Thanks again.

END 
2:57 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event

University of Vermont
Burlington, Vermont

2:25 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, Vermont!  (Applause.)  Thank you!  (Applause.)  Oh, this is a good crowd here in Vermont!  (Applause.)  It is good to be at UVM -- go Catamounts!  (Applause.)  It is good to be in Vermont.  (Applause.) 

Now, out of all 50 states, Vermont has gone the longest without a presidential visit.  (Applause.)  The last time a President stopped by was President Clinton in 1995.  So we decided that today we are going to reset the clock.  (Applause.)  

A couple of acknowledgements I want to make -- first of all, give Jeanne a big round of applause for her introduction.  You’ve got one of the best governors in the country.  (Applause.)  And when flooding came and disaster struck, he was here every single day working on your behalf.  And we couldn’t be prouder of him -- Peter Shumlin.  (Applause.)   You’ve got two outstanding senators, Patrick Leahy and Bernie Sanders.  (Applause.)  You’ve got an outstanding mayor-elect -- Miro Weinberger.  (Applause.)  

Give it up for Grace Potter and the Nocturnals.  (Applause.)  I also want to thank Carolyn Dwyer and the entire host committee for helping to organize this unbelievable event.  (Applause.) 

And one last thing I want to do -- I want to express my condolences to everybody who knew and loved Melissa Jenkins, because I know that some of the elected officials are going on to that funeral.  This is a woman, by all accounts, who devoted her life to her community and helping to shape young minds.  And I know that Vermont is heartbroken, so all we can do is live our lives in a way that pays tribute to hers -- by looking out for her students and her son.  And Michelle and I want to express our thoughts and prayers to everyone who knew her.  So I know that’s a tough situation.  (Applause.)  

Now, I’m here -- (applause) -- maybe I should just quit while I’m ahead here.  (Laughter.)  I am going to take off my jacket, though. It’s a little warm.  (Applause.)  I’m here not just because I need your help.  I’m here because the country needs your help. 

There were a lot of reasons that so many of you worked your hearts out for our campaign in 2008.  It wasn’t because it was going to be easy.  It wasn’t because it was a sure thing.  When you decided to support a candidate named Barack Hussein Obama, that’s not a guarantee of success.  (Laughter.)  You didn’t need a poll to know that might be some heavy sledding there.  (Laughter.)   

The point is you didn’t join the campaign because of me.  You joined it because we had a shared vision for America.  It wasn’t a vision where everybody is left to fend for themselves.  It wasn’t a vision where the rules are made just for the powerful.  It was a vision of an America where everybody who works hard has a chance to get ahead -- everybody.  (Applause.)  

That’s the vision that we shared.  That’s the change that we believed in.  And we knew it wasn’t going to come easy; we knew it wouldn’t come quickly.  But we had confidence, we had faith in each other.  We believed that when Americans make commitments to each other about a bold, generous vision for the country, that we can achieve it.  There’s no challenge we can’t overcome. 

And here’s what I want to report -- that in three years, because of what so many of you did in 2008, we've begun to see what change looks like.  (Applause.)  We’ve begun to see what change looks like.

Change is the first bill I signed into law -- a law that says women deserve an equal day’s pay for an equal day’s work, because I want our daughters treated just like our sons.  (Applause.)  

Change is the decision we made to rescue an auto industry that was on the verge of collapse, even when some said let Detroit go bankrupt.  One million jobs were at stake, so we weren’t going to let that happen.  And today, GM is back on top as the world’s number one automaker, reported the highest profits in 100 years -- (applause) -- 200,000 new jobs over the last two and a half years.  The American auto industry is back and it's making cars that are more fuel-efficient.  So that’s helping the environment, even as we’re putting people to work.  (Applause.)  

Change is the decision we made to stop waiting for Congress to do something about our oil addiction.  That’s why we finally raised our fuel-efficiency standards.  By the middle of the next decade, we will be driving American-made cars that get almost 55 miles to a gallon -- (applause) -- saves the typical family more than $8,000 at the pump.  That’s what change is.   

Change is the fight we won to stop handing $60 billion in taxpayer giveaways to the banks who were processing student loans.  We decided let’s give those student loans directly to students -- (applause) -- which meant we could make college more affordable to young people who need it.  That’s what change is.  That happened because of you. 

And, yes, change is the health care reform that we passed after over a century of trying.  (Applause.)  Reform that will finally ensure that in the United States of America, no one will go broke just because they get sick.  Already -- already 2.5 million young people now have health insurance who didn’t have it before because this law lets them stay on their parent's plan.  (Applause.)  Already millions of seniors are paying less for their prescription drugs because of this law.  Already, Americans can’t be denied or dropped by their insurance company when they need care the most.  Already, they’re getting preventive care that they didn’t have before.  That’s happening right now.  (Applause.)

Change is the fact that for the first time in history, you don’t have to hide who you love in order to serve the country you love, because we ended "don't ask, don't tell."  (Applause.)

Change is the fact that for the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq.  (Applause.)  We refocused our efforts on the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11.  And thanks to the brave men and women in uniform,

al Qaeda is weaker than it has ever been.  Osama bin Laden is no more.  (Applause.)  We’ve begun to transition in Afghanistan to put them in the lead, and start bringing our troops home from Afghanistan.  That’s what change is.  (Applause.)

Now, none of this has been easy.  We’ve had a little resistance from the other side.  (Laughter.)  We’ve got more work to do.  There are still too many Americans who are out there looking for work.  There are still too many families who can barely afford to pay the bills or make the mortgage.  We’re still recovering from the worst economic storm in generations.

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Love you!

THE PRESIDENT:  Love you back!  (Applause.) 

But over the past two years, businesses have added nearly  4 million new jobs.  Our manufacturers are creating jobs for the first time since the 1990s.  Our economy is getting stronger.  The recovery is accelerating.  All of which means the last thing we can afford to do is to go back to the same policies that got us into the mess in the first place.  (Applause.)

But that’s what the other side wants to do.  They make no secret about it.  They want to go back to the days where Wall Street played by its own rules.  They want to go back to the day when insurance companies could do whatever they wanted to.  They want to go back to the days where -- they want to continue to spend trillions of dollars on tax breaks for the wealthiest individuals in America, even if it means adding to the deficit, or gutting education, or gutting investments in clean energy, or hurting Medicare.

AUDIENCE:  Booo --  

THE PRESIDENT:  Their philosophy is simple:  You are on your own.  You’re on your own.  If you are out of work, can’t find a job, tough luck, you’re on your own.  You don’t have health care, -- that’s your problem -- you’re on your own.  If you’re born into poverty, lift yourself up with your own bootstraps even if you don’t have boots.  You’re on your own.  They believe that’s their -- that's how American has advanced.  That’s the cramped, narrow conception they have of liberty.  And they are wrong.  (Applause.)  They are wrong. 

In the United States of America, we are greater together than we are on our own.  (Applause.)  This country advances when we keep that basic American promise -- if you work hard, you can do well enough to raise a family, own a home, send your kids to college, put a little away for retirement.  And it doesn’t matter who you are, where you come from, what you look like.  That’s what has created this extraordinary country of ours.  That’s what we’re fighting for.  (Applause.)  That’s the choice in this election. 

This is not just your usual, run-of-the-mill political debate.  This is the defining issue of our time; a make-or-break moment for the middle class.  That’s what we’ve got to fight for.  (Applause.)   

We can go back to an economy that was built on outsourcing and bad debt and phony financial profits.  Or we can build an economy that’s built to last.  An economy that’s built on American manufacturing and American innovation, and American energy, and American workers who are trained and skilled, and the values that make this country great -- hard work and fair play and shared responsibility.  That’s the vision I believe in.  That’s what I’m fighting for.  (Applause.) 

We’ve got to make sure that the next generation of manufacturing takes root not in Asia, not in Europe, but in factories of Detroit and Pittsburgh and Cleveland.  I don’t want this nation just to be known for buying and consuming things.  I want us build and sell things all around the world.  (Applause.)   I want us to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas  -- reward companies that are investing right here in the United States of America.  (Applause.)    

I want to make our schools the envy of the world.  (Applause.)  And by the way, that starts with the man or woman at the front of the classroom.  (Applause.)  A good teacher -- a good teacher can increase the lifetime earnings of a classroom by over $250,000.  A great teacher can help a child trapped in poverty dream and then live beyond their circumstances.  So I don’t want folks in Washington to be bashing teachers.  I don’t want them to defend the status quo.  I want us to give schools the resources they need to hire good teachers, reward great teachers.  (Applause.)  I want us to grant schools the flexibility to teach with creativity and passion, and stop teaching to the test, and replace teachers who aren’t helping kids learn.  That’s what I want to see happen.  (Applause.)

And when kids do graduate, the most daunting challenge can be the cost of college.  When Americans owe more tuition debt than they do credit card debt, you know we’ve got a problem.  Now, the first thing we’ve got to do -- Congress has to stop interest rates that are currently scheduled to go up in July on student loans, which will be a huge problem for a lot of young people.  I’ve already asked Congress to do it.  They haven’t done it -- shocking enough -- they haven’t done it so far.  (Laughter.)  And colleges and universities have to do their part, too, to keep tuition from going up -- (applause) -- because higher education cannot be a luxury.  It is an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford.  (Applause.) 

An economy built to last is one that supports scientists and researchers and science.  (Applause.)  Whether we’re talking about stem cell research or climate change, we don’t need science deniers.  We need people to understand that America has always succeed because of our belief in science, our investment in research.  (Applause.)  

We’ve got to make sure the next great breakthrough in clean energy happens right here in the United States of America.  We have been subsidizing oil companies for 100 years now through taxpayer giveaways.  I think it’s time -- I just talked about this yesterday -- it’s time to stop taxpayer giveaways to an oil industry that has been rarely more profitable.  Let’s double down on clean energy that has never been more promising -- solar and wind and biofuels, and energy efficiency, electric batteries.  That’s what we need to be investing in.  (Applause.)   

We’ve got to rebuild America.  I want our businesses and our people to have access to the best roads and the best airports, faster high-speed rail and Internet access.  It’s time for us to take the money we were spending at war, use half of it to pay down our debt, use the rest of it to start doing some nation-building right here at home.  (Applause.)

And we’ve got to make sure that we’ve got a tax system that is actually fair.  Part of that is something I call the Buffett Rule.  It’s very simple:  If you are making more than $1 million a year -- I’m not saying you have $1 million, I’m saying you’re making $1 million every year -- then you shouldn’t pay a lower rate than your secretary.  (Applause.)  That’s a pretty simple proposition. 

Now, if you make less than $250,000 a year -- like 98 percent of American families -- your taxes shouldn’t go up because right now folks are struggling still to dig themselves out of this incredible recession.  But if you’re making more than $1 million a year, you can do a little more.  This is not class envy.  This is not class warfare.  This is basic math -- that’s what this is.  (Applause.) 

Look, if somebody like me gets a tax break that they don’t  need and that the country can’t afford, then one of two things are going to happen -- either it adds to our deficit, or we’re taking something away from somebody else.  That student now has to pay a higher interest rate on their student loan because we’ve got to make up the money somewhere.  Or that senior has to start paying more for their Medicare because the money has to be made up somewhere.  Or that veteran doesn’t get the PTSD care that they needed after serving our country.  Or a family that’s struggling to get by maybe is getting less home heating oil assistance. 

Look, there’s no way of getting around that.  Either folks like me are doing more, or somebody who can’t afford it is getting less.  And that’s not right.  That’s not who we are.  That’s not what America is about.  (Applause.)

I hear politicians talking about values in an election year.  I hear a lot about that.  Let me tell you about values.  Hard work, personal responsibility -- those are values.   But looking out for one another -- that’s a value.  (Applause.)  The idea that we’re all in this together -- I am my brother’s keeper, I am my sister’s keeper -- that’s a value.  (Applause.)   The idea that we think about the next generation and we’re taking care of our planet -- that’s a value.  (Applause.)

Each of us is only here because somebody, somewhere, felt responsibility, yes, to their families, but also to their fellow citizens, also to our country’s future.  That’s the American story.  The American story is not just about what we do on our own.  Yes, we’re rugged individualists and we expect personal responsibility, and everybody out there has got to work hard and carry their weight.  But we also have always understood that we   wouldn’t win the race for new jobs and businesses and middle-class security if we were just applying some you’re-on-your-own economics.  It's been tried in our history and it hasn’t worked.  It didn’t work when we tried it in the decade before the Great Depression.  It didn’t work when we tried it in the last decade.  We just tried this.  What they’re peddling has been tried.  It did not work.  (Applause.)  

We know this from our own lives.  If we attract some outstanding young person to become a teacher by giving them the pay and the support that they deserve, and that teacher goes on to educate the next Steve Jobs, well, we all benefit.  We all do better.  America rises.  (Applause.)  If we’re providing faster Internet to rural America so that some small business owner suddenly can sell his or her goods around the world, that’s good for all of us.  If we build a new bridge that saves a shipping company time and money, then workers and customers all around the country benefit.  They do better.  That’s how America became an economic superpower. 

This has not traditionally been a Democratic or Republican idea.  It was a Republican, Teddy Roosevelt, who called for a progressive income tax.  It was Dwight Eisenhower who built the Interstate Highway System.  The first Republican President, President Lincoln -- who, by the way, couldn’t win the nomination for the Republican primary right now.  (Laughter and applause.)  He’d be -- in the middle of a civil war, helped to make the Transcontinental Railroad possible, the land-grant colleges, the National Academy of Scientists.  He understood that we’re in this together, we’ve got to make an investment in our futures.  It was with the help of Republicans that FDR was able to give millions of returning heroes, including my grandfather, the chance to go college through the G.I. Bill.  (Applause.)  

And that same spirit of common purpose, it still exists today.  Maybe it doesn’t exist in Washington.  But out here in Vermont and all across America, it’s there.  (Applause.)  It’s there when you talk to folks on Main Street.  It’s there when you go to a town hall.  It’s there when you talk to members of our armed forces.  It’s there when you talk to people in their places of worship. 

Our politics may be divided.  But most Americans still understand that no matter where you come from, no matter who you are, we rise or fall together as one nation, as one people.  (Applause.)  And that’s what’s at stake right now.  That’s what this election is about. 

So I know we’ve gone through some tough years.  And I know that for all the things we’ve done, we’ve still got so much undone.  And sometimes the change we fought for hasn’t always come as fast as we wanted.  And when you see what's been going on in Washington, I know it’s tempting sometimes to get discouraged, to kind of think, well, maybe change just isn’t possible.  Maybe it was an illusion.  But I want you guys to recall, I did say back in 2008, real change -- big change -- it’s hard.  It takes time.  It takes more than a single term and more than a single President.  What it takes is ordinary citizens who are committed to keep fighting and to keep pushing, and inching us closer and closer and closer to our country’s highest ideals.  (Applause.)  

And you know something else I used to say in 2008 -- I said, I am not a perfect man -- Michelle will tell you that -- and I'll never be a perfect President.  But I made a promise to you then that I would always tell you what I believed and I would always tell you where I stood, and I would wake up every single day fighting as hard as I know how for you.  And I have kept that promise.  (Applause.)  I have kept that promise.  (Applause.)  I have kept that promise.    

So if you’re willing to keep pushing with me through all the obstacles, through all the naysayers; if you’re willing to keep reaching for that vision of America that we all have talked about -- that commitment you didn’t just make to me or I made to you, but that we made to each other -- I guarantee you change will come.  (Applause.)  If you’re willing to work harder in this election than you did in the last one, I promise you change will come.  (Applause.)  If you’re willing to knock on some doors and make some phone calls, I promise you change will come. 

We will finish what we started in 2008.  (Applause.)   Fight with me, and press on with me, and we will remind the world once again just what America is all about. 

God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.  (Applause.)

END
2:55 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama Announces Presidential Delegation to Dakar, Senegal to attend the Inauguration of His Excellency President-elect Macky Sall

President Barack Obama today announced the designation of a Presidential Delegation to Dakar, Senegal to attend the Inauguration of His Excellency President-elect Macky Sall on April 2, 2012.

The Honorable Daniel W. Yohannes, CEO of the Millennium Challenge Corporation, will lead the delegation.

Members of the Presidential Delegation:

The Honorable Lewis Lukens, United States Ambassador to Senegal and to Guinea-Bissau, Department of State 

The Honorable Johnnie Carson, Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Department of State 

General Carter Ham, Commander, United States Africa Command

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event

Sheraton Burlington Hotel
Burlington, Vermont

1:04 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you, everybody.  (Applause.)  Oh, it is good to be in Vermont.  I had to come here because Michelle got such a reception here -- (applause) -- and everybody was saying how popular she was and how much money she had raised and how everybody loved her and -- (laughter) -- I was starting to feel a little -- a little left out.  (Laughter.)  So I said I've got to go there, too.

But part of the reason I had to come is because people like Jane and Bill and Charlie and Marie and others have just been such great friends for such a long time, and the enthusiasm that we received when I was still running when I came here was just extraordinary.  And you've got a couple of outstanding senators, a great member of Congress, just a terrific delegation that has been on the right side of issues for a very long time.  And so I just wanted to come up here and say thank you to the people of Vermont for having such good sense.  (Laughter and applause.)

Also, coming from Chicago, I thought it would be nice to enjoy just even a little taste of winter because I don't think it got below 50 degrees in Washington this entire year.
What I'm going to do is be very brief at the top so that I can spend most of my time answering questions. 

Since Jane and I first met, and Charlie and I first met, and others, obviously this country has gone through an extraordinary journey -- the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, the worst economic crisis since the 1930s, millions of people losing their jobs, a housing market collapsing, changes internationally that very few of us could have imagined three or four or five years earlier.  And so it's been a challenging time for America.

And yet one of the things that always gave me confidence was, as I traveled around the country, both first as a candidate and then as President, what I continually saw was the incredible resilience and strength and imagination of the American people.  And so even during the darkest days of this recession, I always had confidence that America would bounce back.  It was not a matter of if, it was a matter of when.  And the question was would we be able to pull the country together and move not only to get us back to where we were before the financial crisis, but to solve these ongoing problems that we'd been putting off for decades.

And three years, three and a half years later, I'm here to report that we've made extraordinary progress.  We were losing 800,000 jobs a month the month I was sworn in; we've now seen over the last two years almost 4 million jobs created.  The unemployment rate has started to tick down.  We're seeing the strongest employment in manufacturing since the 1990s.  Exports are on track to double the goal that we set.  The economy is starting to get stronger and businesses are starting to feel more confident.

In the meantime, those issues that so many of us were talking about during the election in 2008 we've started to address.  So I said that I'd end the war in Iraq; we've ended it. I said that we would get a health care law that would provide near universal coverage so that people don't have to go bankrupt when they get sick in this country; we got it passed.  We committed to ending "don't ask, don't tell" -- "don't ask, don't tell" is history. 

We said that we needed to help our students make sure that they can go to college, that they can afford it -- and we took $60 billion that was going to the banks to subsidize them managing the student loan program and now that money is going directly to students.  And millions of students are getting higher Pell grants, or eligible for the first time, and we're on track to make sure that college is a lot more affordable for young people so that they can compete in this 21st century economy.

And so not only have we been able to right the ship and get the banking system working again and make sure that the economy has an opportunity to grow, but we're also dealing with some of those underlying issues that had challenged us for a very long time -- doubling fuel efficiency standards on cars, probably the most significant piece of environmental legislation in a very long time that could end up saving us billions of dollars and taking all kinds of carbon out of the atmosphere.

But I think all of us are here today because we know our job isn't finished.  We've got a lot more to do.  We still have to do more to make sure that people who don't have work can find work. We're going to have to do more to make sure that our housing system is working for everybody and that people can start recovering from the beating that they've taken with the decline in the real estate market. 

We still have to have an energy policy that reflects both the short-term challenges that people are feeling, the pinch that they're feeling at the pump, but also the long-term challenges that we're facing in terms of energy independence and climate change. 

We haven't reformed our immigration system yet.  And we're a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants, and there's no reason why we shouldn’t be able to reconcile those values to have a system that's sensible and continues to replenish America with extraordinary talent from all around the world.

We’ve embarked on an extraordinary path to reform K through 12 education through programs like Race to the Top, and we’re encouraging innovation and accountability and making sure that teachers aren’t teaching to the test but instead are able to teach creatively and passionately.  But we’ve got more work to do because there are still too many kids who are being shunted aside.

And on the foreign policy front, we’ve got to execute effective transition out of Afghanistan, leave a stable country, continue to press on those who would do us harm, and continue to forge the kind of diplomacy around the world that restores respect for America but also ensures not only our own security, but also opportunity and well-being for folks who continue to suffer from extraordinary poverty around the world.

So we’ve still got huge challenges remaining and we’re going to have to figure out how to pay for everything that we do -- which brings me to why in some ways this election I think is actually more important than 2008.  In 2008, I was running against a candidate who believed in climate change, believed in immigration reform, believed in the notion of reducing deficits in a balanced way.  We had some profound disagreements but the Republican candidate for President understood that some of these challenges required compromise and bipartisanship. 

And what we’ve witnessed lately is a fundamentally different vision of America and who we are.  It’s an America that says -- or it’s a vision that says that America is about looking out for yourself, not for other people.  It’s an America that denies something like climate change, rejects it; that takes a position on immigration that would have been unthinkable in either party just a few years ago; that when it comes to figuring out how do we pay for the investments that we need to grow, basically says those of us who are doing best don’t have to do a thing and we will balance that budget on the backs of the poor and seniors, and at the expense of basic research and basic science and investments in clean energy and increasing the cost of student loans for students. 

The recent budget that just passed the House, the budget that passed the House yesterday, if you did the math, essentially the only thing that would be left in the federal government would be defense, social security and the entitlement programs -- although those would be diminished -- interest on the national debt.  That would be about it.  You'd be looking at about 1 percent of the entire federal budget devoted to everything else
-- education, environmental protection, science, those things that historically have made us an economic superpower, but also a country in which everybody has a fair shot, everybody does their fair share and everybody is playing by the same set of rules. 

And so, in some ways, this is going to be healthy for our democracy.  I think it’s going to be a clarifying election about who we are and what we stand for.  But it’s enormous -- a lot is at stake in this election.  And we’re going to have to fight for it.  We’re not going to be complacent and be able to deliver on what we think is the right path for our kids and our grandkids and future generations. 

And so I’m going to need your help.  And in some ways, it may be a little harder because it has lost some of the novelty, right?   When back in ’08, it was cool to say, oh, you know, I’m supporting this guy Obama -- you heard of him?  (Laughter.)  Let me tell you about him.  Now I’m old hat, I’m gray.  (Laughter.)  But my determination is undiminished.  My confidence in the core decency of the American people is undiminished.  I believe we’re on the right track.  And Jane is right -- I believe I’m going to get there.  More importantly, I believe America is going to get there with your help.

Thank you very much, everybody.  (Applause.)

END   
1:16 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by the Press Secretary on the Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012

Today the President made the determination required under Section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 regarding the supply of petroleum and petroleum products from countries other than Iran.

The analysis contained in the Energy Information Administration’s report of February 29, 2012, indicates that the oil market became increasingly tight over the first two months of 2012.  That tightness remains today.  A series of production disruptions in South Sudan, Syria, Yemen, Nigeria, and the North Sea have removed oil from the market.  In addition, international concerns over Iran’s nuclear activities and recent steps taken to reduce the amount of Iranian crude oil and petroleum product imports are contributing to an increased demand for non-Iranian crude oil.

Nonetheless, there currently appears to be sufficient supply of non-Iranian oil to permit foreign countries to significantly reduce their import of Iranian oil, taking into account current estimates of demand, increased production by some countries, private inventories of crude oil and petroleum products, and available strategic petroleum reserves and in fact, many purchasers of Iranian crude oil have already reduced their purchases or announced they are in productive discussions with alternative suppliers.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Presidential Memorandum -- Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE
THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY

SUBJECT: Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, after carefully considering the report submitted to the Congress by the Energy Information Administration on February 29, 2012, and other relevant information, and given current global economic conditions, increased production by certain countries, the level of spare capacity, and the existence of strategic reserves, among other factors, I determine, pursuant to section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Pub1ic Law 112-81, that there is a sufficient supply of petroleum and petroleum products from countries other than Iran to permit a significant reduction in the volume of petroleum and petroleum products purchased from Iran by or through foreign financial institutions.

I will closely monitor this situation to assure that the market can continue to accommodate a reduction in purchases of petroleum and petroleum products from Iran.

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

BARACK OBAMA

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by the Press Secretary on H.R. 4281

On Friday, March 30, 2012, the President signed into law:

H.R. 4281, the "Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2012," which provides funding for programs funded from the Highway Trust Fund (HTF) for the period April 1, 2012, through June 30, 2012; and extends the authority to make expenditures from the HTF for HTF-financed programs through June 30, 2012.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Presidential Memorandum -- Establishing a Working Group on the Intersection of HIV/AIDS, Violence Against Women and Girls, and Gender-related Health Disparities

MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES

SUBJECT: Establishing a Working Group on the Intersection of HIV/AIDS, Violence Against Women and Girls, and Gender-related Health Disparities

Throughout our country, the spread of HIV/AIDS has had a devastating impact on many communities.  In the United States, there are approximately 1.2 million people living with HIV/AIDS, including more than 290,000 women.  Women and girls now account for 24 percent of all diagnoses of HIV infection among United States adults and adolescents.  The domestic epidemic disproportionately affects women of color, with African Americans and Latinas constituting over 70 percent of new HIV cases in women.  The spread of HIV/AIDS is, in and of itself, a primary concern to my Administration.  However, gender based violence and gender related health disparities cannot be ignored when addressing the domestic public health threat of HIV/AIDS.  HIV/AIDS programs often ignore the biological differences and the social, economic, and cultural inequities that make women and girls more vulnerable to HIV/AIDS.  In our country, women and girls are all too frequently victimized by domestic violence and sexual assault, which can lead to greater risk for acquiring this disease.  Teenage girls and young women ages 16 24 face the highest rates of dating violence and sexual assault.  In addition, challenges in accessing proper health care can present obstacles to addressing HIV/AIDS.  Gender based violence continues to be an underreported, common problem that, if ignored, increases risks for HIV and may prevent women and girls from seeking prevention, treatment, and health services.

My Administration is committed to improving efforts to understand and address the intersection of HIV/AIDS, violence against women and girls, and gender-related health disparities.  To do so, executive departments and agencies (agencies) must build on their current work addressing the intersection of these issues by improving data collection, research, intervention strategies, and training.  In order to develop a comprehensive Government wide approach to these issues that is data-driven, uses effective prevention and care interventions, engages families and communities, supports research and data collection, and mobilizes both public and private sector resources, I direct the following:

Section 1Working Group on the Intersection of HIV/AIDS, Violence Against Women and Girls, and Gender-related Health Disparities.  There is established within the Executive Office of the President a Working Group on the Intersection of HIV/AIDS,

Violence Against Women and Girls, and Gender related Health Disparities (Working Group), to be co chaired by the White House Advisor on Violence Against Women and the Director of the Office of National AIDS Policy (Co Chairs).  Within 60 days of the date of this memorandum, the Co Chairs shall convene the first meeting of the Working Group.

 (a)  In addition to the Co Chairs, the Working Group shall consist of representatives from:

  (i)the Department of Justice;

  (ii)    the Department of the Interior;

  (iii)   the Department of Health and Human Services;

  (iv)    the Department of Education;

  (v) the Department of Homeland Security;

  (vi)    the Department of Veterans Affairs;

 (vii)   the Department of Housing and Urban Development; and

  (viii)  the Office of Management and Budget.

 (b)  The Working Group shall consult with the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS, as appropriate.

 (c)  The Department of State, the United States Agency for International Development, and the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Gender Technical Working Group shall act in an advisory capacity to the Working Group, providing information on lessons learned and evidence based best practices based on their global experience addressing issues involving the intersection between HIV/AIDS and violence against women.

 Sec. 2Mission and Functions of the Working Group.  (a)  The Working Group shall coordinate agency efforts to address issues involving the intersection of HIV/AIDS, violence against women and girls, and gender related health disparities.  Such efforts shall include, but not be limited to:

(i) increasing government and public awareness of the need to address the intersection of HIV/AIDS, violence against women and girls, and gender related health disparities, including sexual and reproductive health and access to health care;

 (ii)  sharing best practices, including demonstration projects and international work by agencies, as well as successful gender specific strategies aimed at addressing risks that influence women's and girls' vulnerability to HIV infection and violence;

 (iii)  integrating sexual and reproductive health services, gender-based violence services, and HIV/AIDS services, where research demonstrates that doing so will result in improved and sustained health outcomes;

 (iv)  emphasizing evidence based prevention activities that engage men and boys and highlight their role in the prevention of violence against women and HIV/AIDS infection;

 (v) facilitating opportunities for partnerships among diverse organizations from the violence against women and girls, HIV/AIDS, and women's health communities to address the intersection of these issues;

 (vi) ensuring that the needs of vulnerable and underserved groups are considered in any efforts to address issues involving the intersection of HIV/AIDS, violence against women and girls, and gender related health disparities;

 (vii) promoting research to better understand the intersection of the biological, behavioral, and social sciences bases for the relationship between increased HIV/AIDS risk, domestic violence, and gender related health disparities; and

 (viii)  prioritizing, as appropriate, the efforts described in paragraphs (a)(i) (vii) of this section with respect to women and girls of color, who represent the majority of females living with and at risk for HIV infection in the United States.

 (b)  The Working Group shall annually provide the President recommendations for updating the National HIV/AIDS Strategy.  In addition, the Working Group shall provide information on:

 (i)   coordinated actions taken by the Working Group to meet its objectives and identify areas where the Federal Government has achieved integration and coordination in addressing the intersection of HIV/AIDS, violence against women and girls, and gender related health disparities;

 (ii)  alternative means of making available gender sensitive health care for women and girls through the integration of HIV/AIDS prevention and care services with intimate partner violence prevention and counseling as well as mental health and trauma services;

 (iii)  specific, evidence based goals for addressing HIV among women, including HIV related disparities among women of color, to inform the National HIV/AIDS Strategy Implementation Plan (for its biannual review);

 (iv)  research and data collection needs regarding HIV/AIDS, violence against women and girls, and gender related health disparities to help develop more comprehensive data and targeted research (disaggregated by sex, gender, and gender identity, where practicable); and

 (v)  existing partnerships and potential areas of collaboration with other public or nongovernmental actors, taking into consideration the types of implementation or research objectives that other public or nongovernmental actors may be particularly well situated to accomplish.

 Sec. 3Outreach.  Consistent with the objectives of this memorandum and applicable law, the Working Group, in addition to regular meetings, shall conduct outreach with representatives of private and nonprofit organizations, State, tribal, and local government agencies, elected officials, and other interested persons to assist the Working Group in developing a detailed set of recommendations.

 Sec. 4General Provisions.  (a)  The heads of agencies shall assist and provide information to the Working Group, consistent with applicable law, as may be necessary to carry out the functions of the Working Group.  Each agency and office shall bear its own expense for carrying out activities related to the Working Group.

 (b)  Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

 (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or

 (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

 (c)  This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

 (d)  This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

 (e)  The Secretary of Health and Human Services is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

  BARACK OBAMA