Remarks by the President on the Gulf Oil Spill

East Room

12:50 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Good afternoon, everybody. Before I take your questions, I want to update the American people on the status of the BP oil spill -– a catastrophe that is causing tremendous hardship in the Gulf Coast, damaging a precious ecosystem, and one that led to the death of 11 workers who lost their lives in the initial explosion.

Yesterday, the federal government gave BP approval to move forward with a procedure known as a “top kill” to try to stop the leak. This involves plugging the well with densely packed mud to prevent any more oil from escaping. And given the complexity of this procedure and the depth of the leak, this procedure offers no guarantee of success. But we’re exploring any reasonable strategies to try and save the Gulf from a spill that may otherwise last until the relief wells are finished -– and that's a process that could take months.

The American people should know that from the moment this disaster began, the federal government has been in charge of the response effort. As far as I’m concerned, BP is responsible for this horrific disaster, and we will hold them fully accountable on behalf of the United States as well as the people and communities victimized by this tragedy. We will demand that they pay every dime they owe for the damage they’ve done and the painful losses that they’ve caused. And we will continue to take full advantage of the unique technology and expertise they have to help stop this leak.

But make no mistake: BP is operating at our direction. Every key decision and action they take must be approved by us in advance. I’ve designated Admiral Thad Allen -– who has nearly four decades of experience responding to such disasters -– as the National Incident Commander, and if he orders BP to do something to respond to this disaster, they are legally bound to do it. So, for example, when they said they would drill one relief well to stem this leak we demanded a backup and ordered them to drill two. And they are in the process of drilling two.

As we devise strategies to try and stop this leak, we’re also relying on the brightest minds and most advanced technology in the world. We’re relying on a team of scientists and engineers from our own national laboratories and from many other nations -– a team led by our Energy Secretary and Nobel Prize-winning physicist, Stephen Chu. And we’re relying on experts who’ve actually dealt with oil spills from across the globe, though none this challenging.

The federal government is also directing the effort to contain and clean up the damage from the spill -– which is now the largest effort of its kind in U.S. history. In this case, the federal, state, and local governments have the resources and expertise to play an even more direct role in the response effort. And I will be discussing this further when I make my second trip to Louisiana tomorrow. But so far we have about 20,000 people in the region who are working around the clock to contain and clean up this oil. We have activated about 1,400 members of the National Guard in four states. We have the Coast Guard on site. We have more than 1,300 vessels assisting in the containment and cleanup efforts. We’ve deployed over 3 million feet of total boom to stop the oil from coming on shore -– and today more than 100,000 feet of boom is being surged to Louisiana parishes that are facing the greatest risk from the oil.

So we’ll continue to do whatever is necessary to protect and restore the Gulf Coast. For example, Admiral Allen just announced that we’re moving forward with a section of Governor Jindal’s barrier island proposal that could help stop oil from coming ashore. It will be built in an area that is most at risk and where the work can be most quickly completed.

We’re also doing whatever it takes to help the men and women whose livelihoods have been disrupted and even destroyed by this spill -– everyone from fishermen to restaurant and hotel owners. So far the Small Business Administration has approved loans and allowed many small businesses to defer existing loan payments. At our insistence, BP is paying economic injury claims, and we’ll make sure that when all is said and done, the victims of this disaster will get the relief that they are owed. We’re not going to abandon our fellow citizens. We’ll help them recover and we will help them rebuild.

And in the meantime, I should also say that Americans can help by continuing to visit the communities and beaches of the Gulf Coast. I was talking to the governors just a couple of days ago, and they wanted me to remind everybody that except for three beaches in Louisiana, all of the Gulf’s beaches are open. They are safe and they are clean.

As we continue our response effort, we’re also moving quickly on steps to ensure that a catastrophe like this never happens again. I’ve said before that producing oil here in America is an essential part of our overall energy strategy. But all drilling must be safe.

In recent months, I’ve spoken about the dangers of too much -- I’ve heard people speaking about the dangers of too much government regulation. And I think we can all acknowledge there have been times in history when the government has overreached. But in this instance, the oil industry’s cozy and sometimes corrupt relationship with government regulators meant little or no regulation at all.

When Secretary Salazar took office, he found a Minerals and Management Service that had been plagued by corruption for years –- this was the agency charged with not only providing permits, but also enforcing laws governing oil drilling. And the corruption was underscored by a recent Inspector General’s report that covered activity which occurred prior to 2007 -- a report that can only be described as appalling. And Secretary Salazar immediately took steps to clean up that corruption. But this oil spill has made clear that more reforms are needed.

For years, there has been a scandalously close relationship between oil companies and the agency that regulates them. That’s why we’ve decided to separate the people who permit the drilling from those who regulate and ensure the safety of the drilling.

I also announced that no new permits for drilling new wells will go forward until a 30-day safety and environmental review was conducted. That review is now complete. Its initial recommendations include aggressive new operating standards and requirements for offshore energy companies, which we will put in place.

Additionally, after reading the report’s recommendations with Secretary Salazar and other members of my administration, we’re going to be ordering the following actions: First, we will suspend the planned exploration of two locations off the coast of Alaska. Second, we will cancel the pending lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico and the proposed lease sale off the coast of Virginia. Third, we will continue the existing moratorium and suspend the issuance of new permits to drill new deepwater wells for six months. And four, we will suspend action on 33 deepwater exploratory wells currently being drilled in the Gulf of Mexico.

What’s also been made clear from this disaster is that for years the oil and gas industry has leveraged such power that they have effectively been allowed to regulate themselves. One example: Under current law, the Interior Department has only 30 days to review an exploration plan submitted by an oil company. That leaves no time for the appropriate environmental review. They result is, they are continually waived. And this is just one example of a law that was tailored by the industry to serve their needs instead of the public’s. So Congress needs to address these issues as soon as possible, and my administration will work with them to do so.

Still, preventing such a catastrophe in the future will require further study and deeper reform. That’s why last Friday, I also signed an executive order establishing the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling. While there are a number of ongoing investigations, including an independent review by the National Academy of Engineering, the purpose of this commission is to consider both the root causes of the disaster and offer options on what safety and environmental precautions are necessary.

If the laws on our books are inadequate to prevent such a spill, or if we did not enforce those laws, then I want to know. I want to know what worked and what didn’t work in our response to the disaster, and where oversight of the oil and gas industry broke down.

Let me make one final point. More than anything else, this economic and environmental tragedy –- and it’s a tragedy -– underscores the urgent need for this nation to develop clean, renewable sources of energy. Doing so will not only reduce threats to our environment, it will create a new, homegrown, American industry that can lead to countless new businesses and new jobs.

We’ve talked about doing this for decades, and we’ve made significant strides over the last year when it comes to investing in renewable energy and energy efficiency. The House of Representatives has already passed a bill that would finally jumpstart a permanent transition to a clean energy economy, and there is currently a plan in the Senate –- a plan that was developed with ideas from Democrats and Republicans –- that would achieve the same goal.

If nothing else, this disaster should serve as a wake-up call that it’s time to move forward on this legislation. It’s time to accelerate the competition with countries like China, who have already realized the future lies in renewable energy. And it’s time to seize that future ourselves. So I call on Democrats and Republicans in Congress, working with my administration, to answer this challenge once and for all.

I'll close by saying this: This oil spill is an unprecedented disaster. The fact that the source of the leak is a mile under the surface, where no human being can go, has made it enormously difficult to stop. But we are relying on every resource and every idea, every expert and every bit of technology, to work to stop it. We will take ideas from anywhere, but we are going to stop it.

And I know that doesn’t lessen the enormous sense of anger and frustration felt by people on the Gulf and so many Americans. Every day I see this leak continue I am angry and frustrated as well. I realize that this entire response effort will continue to be filtered through the typical prism of politics, but that’s not what I care about right now. What I care about right now is the containment of this disaster and the health and safety and livelihoods of our neighbors in the Gulf Coast. And for as long as it takes, I intend to use the full force of the federal government to protect our fellow citizens and the place where they live. I can assure you of that.

All right. I’m going to take some questions. I’m going to start with Jennifer Loven.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. This is on, right?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes.

Q You just said that the federal government is in charge, and officials in your administration have said this repeatedly. Yet how do you explain that we’re more than five weeks into this crisis and that BP is not always doing as you’re asking, for example with the type of dispersant that’s being used? And if I might add one more; to the many people in the Gulf who, as you said, are angry and frustrated and feel somewhat abandoned, what do you say about whether your personal involvement, your personal engagement, has been as much as it should be either privately or publicly?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I’ll take the second question first, if you don’t mind. The day that the rig collapsed and fell to the bottom of the ocean, I had my team in the Oval Office that first day. Those who think that we were either slow on our response or lacked urgency don’t know the facts. This has been our highest priority since this crisis occurred.

Personally, I’m briefed every day and have probably had more meetings on this issue than just about any issue since we did our Afghan review. And we understood from day one the potential enormity of this crisis and acted accordingly. So when it comes to the moment this crisis occurred, moving forward, this entire White House and this entire federal government has been singularly focused on how do we stop the leak, and how do we prevent and mitigate the damage to our coastlines.

The challenge we have is that we have not seen a leak like this before, and so people are going to be frustrated until it stops. And I understand that. And if you’re living on the coast and you see this sludge coming at you, you are going to be continually upset, and from your perspective, the response is going to be continually inadequate until it actually stops. And that's entirely appropriate and understandable.

But from Thad Allen, our National Incident Coordinator, through the most junior member of the Coast Guard, or the under-under-under secretary of NOAA, or any of the agencies under my charge, they understand this is the single most important thing that we have to get right.

Now, with respect to the relationship between our government and BP, the United States government has always been in charge of making sure that the response is appropriate. BP, under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, is considered the responsible party, which basically means they’ve got to pay for everything that's done to both stop the leak and mitigate the damage. They do so under our supervision, and any major decision that they make has to be done under the approval of Thad Allen, the National Incident Coordinator.

So this notion that somehow the federal government is sitting on the sidelines and for the three or four or five weeks we’ve just been letting BP make a whole bunch of decisions is simply not true.

What is true is that when it comes to stopping the leak down below, the federal government does not possess superior technology to BP. This is something, by the way -- going back to my involvement -- two or three days after this happened, we had a meeting down in the Situation Room in which I specifically asked Bob Gates and Mike Mullen what assets do we have that could potentially help that BP or other oil companies around the world do not have. We do not have superior technology when it comes to dealing with this particular crisis.

Now, one of the legitimate questions that I think needs to be asked is should the federal government have such capacity. And that's part of what the role of the commission is going to be, is to take a look and say, do we make sure that a consortium of oil companies pay for specifically technology to deal with this kind of incident when it happens. Should that response team that’s effective be under the direct charge of the United States government or a private entity? But for now, BP has the best technology, along with the other oil companies, when it comes to actually capping the well down there.

Now, when it comes to what’s happening on the surface, we’ve been much more involved in the in-situ burns, in the skimming. Those have been happening more or less under our direction, and we feel comfortable about many of the steps that have been taken.

There have been areas where there have been disagreements, and I'll give you two examples. Initially on this top kill, there were questions in terms of how effective it could be, but also what were the risks involved, because we’re operating at such a pressurized level, a mile underwater and in such frigid temperatures, that the reactions of various compounds and various approaches had to be calibrated very carefully. That’s when I sent Steven Chu down, the Secretary of Energy, and he brought together a team, basically a brain trust, of some of the smartest folks we have at the National Labs and in academia to essentially serve as a oversight board with BP engineers and scientists in making calculations about how much mud could you pour down, how fast, without risking potentially the whole thing blowing.

So in that situation you’ve got the federal government directly overseeing what BP is doing, and Thad Allen is giving authorization when finally we feel comfortable that the risks of attempting a top kill, for example, are sufficiently reduced that it needs to be tried.

I already mentioned a second example, which is they wanted to drill one relief well. The experience has been that when you drill one relief well, potentially you keep on missing the mark. And so it’s important to have two to maximize the speed and effectiveness of a relief well.

And right now Thad Allen is down there, because I think he -- it’s his view that some of the allocation of boom or other efforts to protect shorelines hasn’t been as nimble as it needs to be. And he said so publicly. And so he will be making sure that, in fact, the resources to protect the shorelines are there immediately.

But here’s the broad point: There has never been a point during this crisis in which this administration, up and down up the line, in all these agencies, hasn’t, number one, understood this was my top priority -- getting this stopped and then mitigating the damage; and number two, understanding that if BP wasn’t doing what our best options were, we were fully empowered and instruct them, to tell them to do something different.

And so if you take a look at what’s transpired over the last four to five weeks, there may be areas where there have been disagreements, for example, on dispersants, and these are complicated issues. But overall, the decisions that have been made have been reflective of the best science that we’ve got, the best expert opinion that we have, and have been weighing various risks and various options to allocate our resources in such a way that we can get this fixed as quickly as possible.

Jake Tapper.

Q Thanks, Mr. President. You say that everything that could be done is being done, but there are those in the region and those industry experts who say that’s not true. Governor Jindal obviously had this proposal for a barrier. They say that if that had been approved when they first asked for it, they would have 10 miles up already. There are fishermen down there who want to work, who want to help, haven’t been trained, haven’t been told to go do so. There are industry experts who say that they’re surprised that tankers haven’t been sent out there to vacuum, as was done in ’93 outside Saudi Arabia. And then, of course, there’s the fact that there are 17 countries that have offered to help and it’s only been accepted from two countries, Norway and Mexico. How can you say that everything that can be done is being done with all these experts and all these officials saying that’s not true?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, let me distinguish between -- if the question is, Jake, are we doing everything perfectly out there, then the answer is absolutely not. We can always do better. If the question is, are we, each time there is an idea, evaluating it and making a decision, is this the best option that we have right now, based on how quickly we can stop this leak and how much damage can we mitigate -- then the answer is yes.

So let’s take the example of Governor Jindal’s barrier islands idea. When I met with him when I was down there two weeks ago, I said I will make sure that our team immediately reviews this idea, that the Army Corps of Engineers is looking at the feasibility of it, and if they think -- if they tell me that this is the best approach to dealing with this problem, then we’re going to move quickly to execute it. If they have a disagreement with Governor Jindal’s experts as to whether this would be effective or not, whether it was going to be cost-effective, given the other things that need to be done, then we’ll sit down and try to figure that out.

And that essentially is what happened, which is why today you saw an announcement where, from the Army Corps’ perspective, there were some areas where this might work, but there are some areas where it would be counter-productive and not a good use of resources.

So the point is, on each of these points that you just mentioned, the job of our response team is to say, okay, if 17 countries have offered equipment and help, let’s evaluate what they’ve offered: How fast can it get here? Is it actually going to be redundant, or will it actually add to the overall effort -- because in some cases, more may not actually be better. And decisions have been made based on the best information available that says here’s what we need right now. It may be that a week from now or two weeks from now or a month from now the offers from some of those countries might be more effectively utilized.

Now, it’s going to be entirely possible in a operation this large that mistakes are made, judgments prove to be wrong; that people say in retrospect, you know, if we could have done that or we did that, this might have turned out differently -- although in a lot of cases it may be speculation. But the point that I was addressing from Jennifer was, does this administration maintain a constant sense of urgency about this, and are we examining every recommendation, every idea that's out there, and making our best judgment as to whether these are the right steps to take, based on the best experts that we know of. And on that answer, the answer is yes -- or on that question, the answer is yes.

Chuck Todd.

Q I just want to follow up on the question as it has to do with the relationship between the government and BP. It seems that you’ve made the case on the technical issues. But onshore, Admiral Allen admitted the other day in a White House briefing that they needed to be pushed harder. Senator Mary Landrieu this morning said it’s not clear who’s in charge, that the government should be in charge. Why not ask BP to simply step aside on the onshore stuff, make it an entirely government thing? Obviously BP pays for it, but why not ask them to just completely step aside on that front?

And then also, can you respond to all the Katrina comparisons that people are making about this with yourself?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I’ll take your second question first. I’ll leave it to you guys to make those comparisons, and make judgments on it, because what I’m spending my time thinking about is how do we solve the problem. And when the problem is solved and people look back and do an assessment of all the various decisions that were made, I think people can make a historical judgment. And I’m confident that people are going to look back and say that this administration was on top of what was an unprecedented crisis.

In terms of shoreline protection, the way this thing has been set up under the oil spill act of 1990 -- Oil Pollution Act -- is that BP has contracts with a whole bunch of contractors on file in the event that there is an oil spill, and as soon as the Deep Horizon well went down, then their job is to activate those and start paying them. So a big chunk of the 20,000 who are already down there are being paid by BP.

The Coast Guard’s job is to approve and authorize whatever BP is doing. Now, what Admiral Allen said today, and the reason he’s down there today, is that if BP’s contractors are not moving as nimbly and as effectively as they need to be, then it is already the power of the federal government to redirect those resources. I guess the point being that the Coast Guard and our military are potentially already in charge as long as we’ve got good information and we are making the right decisions.

And if there are mistakes that are being made right now, we’ve got the power to correct those decisions. We don’t have to necessarily reconfigure the setup down there. What we do have to make sure of is, is that on each and every one of the decisions that are being made about what beaches to protect, what’s going to happen with these marshes, if we build a barrier island, how is this going to have an impact on the ecology of the area over the long term -- in each of those decisions, we’ve got to get it right.

Q You understand the credibility of BP seems to be so bad -- that there’s almost no trust that they’re getting --

THE PRESIDENT: I understand. And part of the purpose of this press conference is to explain to the folks down in the Gulf that ultimately it is our folks down there who are responsible. If they’re not satisfied with something that’s happening, then they need to let us know and we will immediately question BP and ask them why isn’t X, Y, Z happening. And those skimmers, those boats, that boom, the people who are out there collecting some of the oil that’s already hit shore, they can be moved and redirected at any point.

And so, understandably, people are frustrated, because, look, this is a big mess coming to shore and even if we’ve got a perfect organizational structure, spots are going to be missed, oil is going to go to places that maybe somebody thinks it could have been prevented from going. There is going to be damage that is heartbreaking to see. People’s livelihoods are going to be affected in painful ways. The best thing for us to do is to make sure that every decision about how we’re allocating the resources that we’ve got is being made based on the best expert advice that’s available.

So I’ll take one last stab at this, Chuck. The problem I don’t think is that BP is off running around doing whatever it wants and nobody is minding the store. Inevitably in something this big, there are going to be places where things fall short. But I want everybody to understand today that our teams are authorized to direct BP in the same way that they’d be authorized to direct those same teams if they were technically being paid by the federal government. In either circumstance, we’ve got the authority that we need. We just got to make sure that we’re exercising it effectively.

All right, Steve Thomma.

Q Thank you, sir. On April 21st, Admiral Allen tells us the government started dispatching equipment rapidly to the Gulf, and you just said on day one you recognized the enormity of this situation. Yet here we are 39, 40 days later, you’re still having to rush more equipment, more boom. There are still areas of the coast unprotected. Why is it taking so long? And did you really act from day one for a worst-case scenario?

THE PRESIDENT: We did. Part of the problem you’ve got is -- let’s take the example of boom. The way the plans have been developed -- and I’m not an expert on this, but this is as it’s been explained to me -- pre-deploying boom would have been the right thing to do; making sure that there is boom right there in the region at various spots where you could anticipate, if there was a spill of this size, the boom would be right there ready to grab.

Unfortunately, that wasn’t always the case. And so this goes back to something that Jake asked earlier. When it comes to the response since the crisis happened, I am very confident that the federal government has acted consistently with a sense of urgency.

When it comes to prior to this accident happening, I think there was a lack of anticipating what the worst-case scenarios would be. And that's a problem. And part of that problem was lodged in MMS and the way that that agency was structured. That was the agency in charge of providing permitting and making decisions in terms of where drilling could take place, but also in charge of enforcing the safety provisions. And as I indicated before, the IG report, the Inspecter General’s report that came out, was scathing in terms of the problems there.

And when Ken Salazar came in, he cleaned a lot of that up. But more needed to be done, and more needs to be done, which is part of the reason why he separated out the permitting function from the functions that involve enforcing the various safety regulations.

But I think on a whole bunch of fronts, you had a complacency when it came to what happens in the worst-case scenario.

I'll give you another example, because this is something that some of you have written about -- the question of how is it that oil companies kept on getting environmental waivers in getting their permits approved. Well, it turns out that the way the process works, first of all, there is a thorough environmental review as to whether a certain portion of the Gulf should be leased or not. That’s a thorough-going environmental evaluation. Then the overall lease is broken up into segments for individual leases, and again there’s an environmental review that’s done.

But when it comes to a specific company with its exploration plan in that one particular area -- they’re going to drill right here in this spot -- Congress mandated that only 30 days could be allocated before a yes or no answer was given. That was by law. So MMS’s hands were tied. And as a consequence, what became the habit, predating my administration, was you just automatically gave the environmental waiver, because you couldn’t complete an environmental study in 30 days.

So what you’ve got is a whole bunch of aspects to how oversight was exercised in deepwater drilling that were very problematic. And that’s why it’s so important that this commission moves forward and examines, from soup to nuts, why did this happen; how should this proceed in a safe, effective manner; what’s required when it comes to worst-case scenarios to prevent something like this from happening.

I continue to believe that oil production is important, domestic oil production is important. But I also believe we can’t do this stuff if we don’t have confidence that we can prevent crises like this from happening again. And it’s going to take some time for the experts to make those determinations. And as I said, in the meantime, I think it’s appropriate that we keep in place the moratorium that I’ve already issued.

Chip Reid.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. First of all, Elizabeth Birnbaum resigned today. Did she resign? Was she fired? Was she forced out? And if so, why? And should other heads roll as we go on here?

Secondly, with regard to the Minerals Management Service, Secretary Salazar yesterday basically blamed the Bush administration for the cozy relationship there, and you seemed to suggest that when you spoke in the Rose Garden a few weeks ago when you said, for too long, a decade or more -- most of those years, of course, the Bush administration -- there’s been a cozy relationship between the oil companies and the federal agency that permits them to drill. But you knew as soon as you came in, and Secretary Salazar did, about this cozy relationship, but you continued to give permits -- some of them under questionable circumstances. Is it fair to blame the Bush administration? Don't you deserve some of that?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, let me just make the point that I made earlier, which is Salazar came in and started cleaning house, but the culture had not fully changed in MMS. And absolutely I take responsibility for that. There wasn’t sufficient urgency in terms of the pace of how those changes needed to take place.

There’s no evidence that some of the corrupt practices that had taken place earlier took place under the current administration’s watch. But a culture in which oil companies were able to get what they wanted without sufficient oversight and regulation -- that was a real problem. Some of it was constraints of the law, as I just mentioned, but we should have busted through those constraints.

Now, with respect to Ms. Birnbaum, I found out about her resignation today. Ken Salazar has been in testimony throughout the day, so I don’t know the circumstances in which this occurred. I can tell you what I’ve said to Ken Salazar, which is that we have to make sure, if we are going forward with domestic oil production, that the federal agency charged with overseeing its safety and security is operating at the highest level. And I want people in there who are operating at the highest level and aren’t making excuses when things break down, but are intent on fixing them. And I have confidence that Ken Salazar can do that.

Q Is his job safe?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes.

Julianna.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. We’re learning today that the oil has been gushing as much as five times the initial estimates. What does that tell you and the American people about the extent to which BP can be trusted on any of the information that it’s providing, whether the events leading up to the spill, any of their information?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, BP’s interests are aligned with the public interest to the extent that they want to get this well capped. It’s bad for their business. It’s bad for their bottom line. They’re going to be paying a lot of damages, and we’ll be staying on them about that. So I think it’s fair to say that they want this thing capped as badly as anybody does and they want to minimize the damage as much as they can.

I think it is a legitimate concern to question whether BP’s interests in being fully forthcoming about the extent of the damage is aligned with the public interest. I mean, their interests may be to minimize the damage, and to the extent that they have better information than anybody else, to not be fully forthcoming. So my attitude is we have to verify whatever it is they say about the damage.

This is an area, by the way, where I do think our efforts fell short. And I’m not contradicting my prior point that people were working as hard as they could and doing the best that they could on this front. But I do believe that when the initial estimates came that there were -- it was 5,000 barrels spilling into the ocean per day, that was based on satellite imagery and satellite data that would give a rough calculation. At that point, BP already had a camera down there, but wasn’t fully forthcoming in terms of what did those pictures look like. And when you set it up in time-lapse photography, experts could then make a more accurate determination. The administration pushed them to release it, but they should have pushed them sooner. I mean, I think that it took too long for us to stand up our flow-tracking group that has now made these more accurate ranges of calculation.

Now, keep in mind that that didn’t change what our response was. As I said from the start, we understood that this could be really bad. We are hoping for the best, but preparing for the worst. And so there aren’t steps that would have taken in terms of trying to cap the well, or skimming the surface, or the in-situ burns, or preparing to make sure when this stuff hit shore that we could minimize the damage -- all those steps would have been the same even if we had information that this flow was coming out faster.

And eventually, we would have gotten better information because, by law, the federal government, if it’s going to be charging BP for the damage that it causes, is going to have to do the best possible assessment. But there was a lag of several weeks that I think shouldn’t have happened.

Helen Thomas.

Q Mr. President, when are you going to get out of Afghanistan? Why are we continuing to kill and die there? What is the real excuse? And don't give us this Bushism, “if we don't go there, they’ll all come here.”

THE PRESIDENT: Well, Helen, the reason we originally went to Afghanistan was because that was the base from which attacks were launched that killed 3,000 people -- I’m going to get to your question, I promise. But I just want to remind people we went there because the Taliban was harboring al Qaeda, which had launched an attack that killed 3,000 Americans.

Al Qaeda escaped capture and they set up in the border regions between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Al Qaeda has affiliates that not only provide them safe harbor, but increasingly are willing to conduct their own terrorist operations initially in Afghanistan and in Pakistan, but increasingly directed against Western targets and targets of our allies as well.

So it is absolutely critical that we dismantle that network of extremists that are willing to attack us. And they are currently --

Q -- a threat to us?

THE PRESIDENT: They absolutely are a threat to us. They’re a significant threat to us. I wouldn’t be deploying young men and women into harm’s way if I didn’t think that they were an absolute threat to us.

Now, General McChrystal’s strategy, which I think is the right one, is that we are going to clear out Taliban strongholds; we are going to strengthen the capacity of the Afghan military; and we are going to get them stood up in a way that allows us then to start drawing down our troops but continuing to provide support for Afghan in its effort to create a stable government.

It is a difficult process. At the same time, we’ve also got to work with Pakistan so that they are more effective partners in dealing with the extremists that are within their borders. And it is a big, messy process. But we are making progress in part because the young men and women under General McChrystal’s supervision, as well as our coalition partners, are making enormous sacrifices; but also on the civilian side, we’re starting to make progress in terms of building capacity that will allow us then to draw down with an effective partner.

Jackie Calmes, New York Times.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. I want to follow up on something -- exchange you had with Chip. Leaving aside the existing permits for drilling in the Gulf, before -- weeks before BP, you had called for expanded drilling. Do you now regret that decision? And why did you do so knowing what you have described today about the sort of dysfunction in the MMS?

THE PRESIDENT: I continue to believe what I said at that time, which was that domestic oil production is an important part of our overall energy mix. It has to be part of an overall energy strategy. I also believe that it is insufficient to meet the needs of our future, which is why I’ve made huge investments in clean energy, why we continue to promote solar and wind and biodiesel and a whole range of other approaches, why we’re putting so much emphasis on energy efficiency.

But we’re not going to be able to transition to these clean energy strategies right away. I mean, we’re still years off and some technological breakthroughs away from being able to operate on purely a clean energy grid. During that time, we’re going to be using oil. And to the extent that we’re using oil, it makes sense for us to develop our oil and natural gas resources here in the United States and not simply rely on imports. That’s important for our economy; that’s important for economic growth.
 
So the overall framework, which is to say domestic oil production should be part of our overall energy mix, I think continues to be the right one. Where I was wrong was in my belief that the oil companies had their act together when it came to worst-case scenarios.

Now, that wasn’t based on just my blind acceptance of their statements. Oil drilling has been going on in the Gulf, including deepwater, for quite some time. And the record of accidents like this we hadn’t seen before. But it just takes one for us to have a wake-up call and recognize that claims that fail-safe procedures were in place, or that blowout preventers would function properly, or that valves would switch on and shut things off, that -- whether it’s because of human error, because of the technology was faulty, because when you’re operating at these depths you can’t anticipate exactly what happens -- those assumptions proved to be incorrect.

And so I’m absolutely convinced that we have to do a thorough-going scrub of that -- those safety procedures and those safety records. And we have to have confidence that even if it’s just a one-in-a-million shot, that we’ve got enough technology know-how that we can shut something like this down not in a month, not in six weeks, but in two or three or four days. And I don’t have that confidence right now.

Q If I could follow up --

THE PRESIDENT: Sure.

Q Do you -- are you sorry now? Do you regret that your team had not done the reforms at the Minerals Management Service that you’ve subsequently called for? And I’m also curious as to how it is that you didn’t know about Ms. Birnbaum’s resignation/firing before --

THE PRESIDENT: Well, you’re assuming it was a firing. If it was a resignation, then she would have submitted a letter to Mr. Salazar this morning, at a time when I had a whole bunch of other stuff going on.

Q So you rule out that she was fired?

THE PRESIDENT: Come on, Jackie, I don’t know. I’m telling you the -- I found out about it this morning, so I don’t yet know the circumstances, and Ken Salazar has been in testimony on the Hill.

With respect to your first question, at MMS, Ken Salazar was in the process of making these reforms. But the point that I’m making is, is that obviously they weren’t happening fast enough. If they had been happening fast enough, this might have been caught. Now, it’s possible that it might now have been caught. I mean, we could have gone through a whole new process for environmental review; you could have had a bunch of technical folks take a look at BP’s plans, and they might have said, this is -- meets industry standards, we haven’t had an accident like this in 15 years and we should go ahead.

That’s what this commission has to discover, is -- was this a systemic breakdown? Is this something that could happen once in a million times? Is it something that could happen once in a thousand times, or once every 5,000 times? What exactly are the risks involved?

Now, let me make one broader point, though, about energy. The fact that oil companies now have to go a mile underwater and then drill another three miles below that in order to hit oil tells us something about the direction of the oil industry. Extraction is more expensive and it is going to be inherently more risky.

And so that’s part of the reason you never heard me say, “Drill, baby, drill” -- because we can’t drill our way out of the problem. It may be part of the mix as a bridge to a transition to new technologies and new energy sources, but we should be pretty modest in understanding that the easily accessible oil has already been sucked up out of the ground.

And as we are moving forward, the technology gets more complicated, the oil sources are more remote, and that means that there’s probably going to end up being more risk. And we as a society are going to have to make some very serious determinations in terms of what risks are we willing to accept. And that’s part of what the commission I think is going to have to look at.

I will tell you, though, that understanding we need to grow -- we’re going to be consuming oil for our industries and for how people live in this country, we’re going to have to start moving on this transition. And that’s why when I went to the Republican Caucus just this week, I said to them, let’s work together. You’ve got Lieberman and Kerry, who previously were working with Lindsey Graham -- even though Lindsey is not on the bill right now -- coming up with a framework that has the potential to get bipartisan support, and says, yes, we’re going to still need oil production, but you know what, we can see what’s out there on the horizon, and it’s a problem if we don't start changing how we operate.

Macarena Vidal. Not here? Oh, there you are.

Q Mr. President, you announced -- or the White House announced two days ago that you were going to send 1,200 people to -- 1,200 members of the National Guard to the border. I want to -- if you could precise what their target is going to be, what you’re planning to achieve with that -- if you could clarify a bit more the mission that they're going to have.

And also on Arizona, after you have criticized so much the immigration law that has been approved there, would you support the boycott that some organizations are calling towards that state?

THE PRESIDENT: I’ve indicated that I don't approve of the Arizona law. I think it’s the wrong approach. I understand the frustrations of the people of Arizona and a lot of folks along the border that that border has not been entirely secured in a way that is both true to our traditions as a nation of law and as a nation of immigrants.

I’m President of the United States; I don't endorse boycotts or not endorse boycotts. That's something that the private citizens can make a decision about. What my administration is doing is examining very closely this Arizona law and its implications for the civil rights and civil liberties for the people in Arizona, as well as the concern that you start getting a patchwork of 50 different immigration laws around the country in an area that is inherently the job of the federal government.

Now, for the federal government to do its job, everybody has got to step up. And so I’ve tried to be as clear as I could this week, and I will repeat it to everybody who’s here: We have to have a comprehensive approach to immigration reform. The time to get moving on this is now. And I am prepared to work with both parties and members of Congress to get a bill that does a good job securing our borders; holds employers accountable; makes sure that those who have come here illegally have to pay a fine, pay back taxes, learn English, and get right by the law.

We had the opportunity to do that. We’ve done -- we’ve gotten a vote of a super majority in the Senate just four years ago. There’s no reason why we shouldn’t be able to recreate that bipartisan spirit to get this problem solved.

Now, with respect to the National Guardsmen and women, I have authorized up to 1,200 National Guardspersons in a plan that was actually shaped last year. So this is not simply in response to the Arizona law. And what we find is, is that National Guardspersons can help on intelligence; dealing with both drug and human trafficking along the borders; they can relieve border guards so that the border guards then can be in charge of law enforcement in those areas. So there are a lot of functions that they can carry out that helps leverage and increase the resources available in this area.

By the way, we didn’t just send National Guard. We’ve also got a package of $500 million in additional resources, because, for example, if we are doing a better job dealing with trafficking along the border, we’ve also got to make sure that we’ve got prosecutors down there who can prosecute those cases.

But the key point I want to emphasize to you is that I don’t see these issues in isolation. We’re not going to solve the problem just solely as a consequence of sending National Guard troops down there. We’re going to solve this problem because we have created an orderly, fair, humane immigration framework in which people are able to immigrate to this country in a legal fashion; employers are held accountable for hiring legally present workers.

And I think we can craft that system if everybody is willing to step up. And I told the Republican Caucus when I met with them this week, I don’t even need you to meet me halfway; meet me a quarter of the way. I’ll bring the majority of Democrats to a smart, sensible, comprehensive immigration reform bill. But I’m going to have to have some help, given the rules of the Senate, where a simple majority is not enough.

Last question, Major.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. Good afternoon.

THE PRESIDENT: Good afternoon.

Q Two issues. Some in your government have said the federal government’s boot is on the neck of BP. Are you comfortable with that imagery, sir? Is your boot on the neck of BP? And can you understand, sir, why some in the Gulf who feel besieged by this oil spill consider that a meaningless, possibly ludicrous, metaphor?

Secondarily, can you tell the American public, sir, what your White House did or did not offer Congressman Sestak to not enter the Democratic senatorial primary? And how will you meet your levels of expressed transparency and ethics to convey that answer to satisfy what appear to be bipartisan calls for greater disclosure about that matter? Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: There will be an official response shortly on the Sestak issue, which I hope will answer your questions.

Q From you, sir?

THE PRESIDENT: You will get it from my administration. And it will be coming out -- when I say “shortly,” I mean shortly. I don’t mean weeks or months. With respect to the first --

Q Can you assure the public it was ethical and legal, sir?

THE PRESIDENT: I can assure the public that nothing improper took place. But, as I said, there will be a response shortly on that issue.

With respect to the metaphor that was used, I think Ken Salazar would probably be the first one to admit that he has been frustrated, angry, and occasionally emotional about this issue, like a lot of people have. I mean, there are a lot of folks out there who see what’s happening and are angry at BP, are frustrated that it hasn’t stopped. And so I’ll let Ken answer for himself. I would say that we don’t need to use language like that; what we need is actions that make sure that BP is being held accountable. And that’s what I intend to do, and I think that’s what Ken Salazar intends to do.

But, look, we’ve gone through a difficult year and a half. This is just one more bit of difficulty. And this is going to be hard not just right now, it’s going to be hard for months to come. The Gulf --

Q This --

THE PRESIDENT: This spill. The Gulf is going to be affected in a bad way. And so my job right now is just to make sure that everybody in the Gulf understands this is what I wake up to in the morning and this is what I go to bed at night thinking about.

Q The spill?

THE PRESIDENT: The spill. And it’s not just me, by the way. When I woke this morning and I’m shaving and Malia knocks on my bathroom door and she peeks in her head and she says, “Did you plug the hole yet, Daddy?” Because I think everybody understands that when we are fouling the Earth like this, it has concrete implications not just for this generation, but for future generations.

I grew up in Hawaii where the ocean is sacred. And when you see birds flying around with oil all over their feathers and turtles dying, that doesn’t just speak to the immediate economic consequences of this; this speaks to how are we caring for this incredible bounty that we have.

And so sometimes when I hear folks down in Louisiana expressing frustrations, I may not always think that they're comments are fair; on the other hand, I probably think to myself, these are folks who grew up fishing in these wetlands and seeing this as an integral part of who they are -- and to see that messed up in this fashion would be infuriating.

So the thing that the American people need to understand is that not a day goes by where the federal government is not constantly thinking about how do we make sure that we minimize the damage on this, we close this thing down, we review what happened to make sure that it does not happen again. And in that sense, there are analogies to what’s been happening in terms of in the financial markets and some of these other areas where big crises happen -- it forces us to do some soul searching. And I think that’s important for all of us to do.

In the meantime, my job is to get this fixed. And in case anybody wonders -- in any of your reporting, in case you were wondering who’s responsible, I take responsibility. It is my job to make sure that everything is done to shut this down. That doesn’t mean it’s going to be easy. It doesn’t mean it’s going to happen right away or the way I’d like it to happen. It doesn’t mean that we’re not going to make mistakes. But there shouldn’t be any confusion here: The federal government is fully engaged, and I’m fully engaged.

All right. Thank you very much, everybody.

END
1:53 P.M. EDT

Remarks by the First Lady at Detroit Mentoring Luncheon

Detroit Institute of Art, Detroit, Michigan

12:54 P.M. EDT

MRS. OBAMA:  It’s good to see you.  You all please sit down.   So, how does it feel?  Pretty good, huh?  Are you hungry, you anxious?  Well, don't be.  We’re excited to be here.

First of all, I want to thank the First Gentleman of Michigan, Dan Mulhern, who is my friend.  I want us to give him another round of applause, because he and the governor -- (applause) -- they’ve been doing such a fantastic job promoting mentoring all around the state.

But it is a pleasure for me to be here with you all today to bring together some of the most extraordinary men and women in our country with some of the most promising young people in this city so that you all could really get a chance to talk, and learn from each other, and hopefully inspire one other.

As you see, because everyone was introduced, we’ve got just some amazing people who have flown here just to be with you.  Many have had to come from all over the place to be here, not just me.  We’ve got a Cabinet Secretary, we’ve got a governor, a mayor.  We’ve got CEOs here, we’ve got members of Congress, we have one of the great filmmakers of our time.  We’ve got an NBA legend and entrepreneur, and we have the head of the United States Secret Service presidential detail.  And just so you know how important this man is to me, he protects my husband.  He makes sure that everywhere he goes -- (applause) -- the Secret Service to us are like family, and we love them dearly, and we’re just honored to have one of them among us today. 

All of these folks have broken barriers in some way or another.  They’ve transformed lives, and they’ve changed the way that we look at the world.  And they’re all here today for one simple reason -- and that's to share the lessons that they’ve learned from their remarkable lives and experiences with all of you young people, all of whom have your own hopes and dreams and ambitions, all your own.  We hope that you do.  We hope that you’re dreaming really big. 

They’re here because -- we’re all here because we believe in you.  It is as simple as that.  We are believing in you so deeply.  We believe that you all have something really special to offer, and because we all see a little bit of ourselves in you.  That's why I do this, because when I look at you, I see me.  I was the same kid you all were.  I won’t give you numbers or ages or anything, but it was a little while ago.

The important thing to know is that these folks weren’t always the leaders that you see today.  They weren’t born this way.  They didn’t always have fame, and accomplishments, or fancy titles to their name.  Many of them come from pretty humble backgrounds, and they’ve never imagined that they’d be where they are today.  And again, many of them started out just like you, and it’s important to know that.

What we all know in our lives and through our experiences is that there’s no magic dust that is sprinkled on us that gives us success.  There’s no magic to this.  There are no shortcuts, there are no quick fixes.  None of us was born with the knowledge that we have today, the skills or the talents that we have today.  Some, maybe.  You’ve got your special people that were just born crazy talented or crazy smart, but it wasn’t me, or the President, for that matter.  All these folks here developed those things through hard work.

Governor Granholm wasn’t born knowing how to run a state; probably never thought she’d be doing it.  Magic Johnson didn’t know how to always -- did you always know how to dribble?  (Laughter.)  Maybe you did.  Maybe you were one of the ones.  But you didn’t always know how to run your own business, right?  So, Susan Taylor’s magazine didn’t just publish itself -- Essence, one of my favorites.  These achievements took effort and struggle, late nights and long hours.  And all these folks practiced and practiced, and then practiced a little more, to get those promotions, to win those elections, and to hit those notes just right.

When people doubted them, or told them they couldn’t do something, they worked a little harder.  When they were scared or worried -- and let me tell you, we all have been worried that we just wouldn’t measure up -- they all found a way to keep going.  When they fell short or failed -- and failure is a part of success, it’s a necessary part of success -- they didn’t let that defeat them.  They let it teach them.

And all along, they found people in their lives to guide them:  parents, and grandparents, teachers, coaches, friends who believed in them, who encouraged them and refused to give up on them even when they wanted to give up on themselves.

Cathie Black, who is the CEO of Hearst Magazine, she told us she had a boss who looked after her every step of the way and gave her the good advice that helped her career take off.  And then Mayor Bing, your mayor, had a basketball coach, we understand, who was like a second father to him, encouraging him to play even when everyone else said he was too small.  You were serious about that, Mayor Bing.  Have you seen your mayor?  There’s nothing too small about him.  And there’s Spike Lee who had a film professor in college who pushed his students as hard as he could, insisting that they shoot their films in just three days and then edit them in two, and he was the one that encouraged Spike to make his first movie.

Unfortunately, too many young people today don’t have that kind of support.  They’ve got big dreams and the talent and the drive to fulfill those dreams, but they’ve never been given the chance.  They never find someone to guide their path.  And the more opportunities they miss out on early in their lives, the harder it becomes to catch up later.

And as First Lady, one of the things I am determined to do -- I’m determined to do everything in my power to try to bridge that gap.  And I have to tell you, I am incredibly impressed with the work that's going on right here in Michigan through the Mentor Michigan program that your governor and First Gentleman have worked so hard to promote.  By promoting and supporting mentoring organizations and creating partnerships with businesses, schools, non-profits and government, this initiative has more than doubled the number of mentors in Michigan in just five years.  That's astounding.

That’s a trend that I’d like to see all across this country.  And that’s why I’ve reached out to young people in our new hometown in D.C.  One of the initiatives I’ve worked on since I’ve been First Lady that I’m most proud of is that we've created a White House Leadership and Mentoring initiative, matching up White House staffers with young people in Washington, where they get to come to the White House and do special events and following me around on some of my trips in D.C.  And I’m working to host mentoring events just like the one we’re doing here today, just like the big rally we did at Wayne State.  We want to see this going on around the country where folks like all of you can come together, and share a meal and share your stories.

The idea here is just to -- isn’t just to create a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for just a few of you who get to be here.  But it’s -- the big goal is to encourage more caring adults to step up, and volunteer their time, and to make mentoring a lifelong habit.

And it’s to encourage the mentees, all of you all -- and this is important for me, this is what I’m asking back from you -- is to take the initiative in seeking out mentors in your own lives.  It doesn’t always happen automatically, because the truth is, you can’t hang out with famous folks like these every day, right?  This lunch doesn’t happen every day.  It may not happen again in your lifetime.  But you don’t need it to.  Every day of your lives, you’re surrounded by potential mentors.  And the best mentors in my life weren’t anybody famous.  They were folks that I knew:  teachers, parents, neighbors, coaches, you name it.  They’re all around.  And you have to be willing to reach out to them, and be brave enough to step up to somebody and say, you know what, can I come and see you in your office, can I call you, can I e-mail you?

I know I had to do that.  I had to find, snatch my mentors up, and you all need to do the same thing.  So I want you to remember, don’t be afraid to ask for help.  Don't think that there’s someone too important or too out of reach to ask for help, because there are so many of us adults, no matter what our titles are, whether we’re living in the White House or living next door, who want to help.  And that's something that I didn’t really know when I was growing up.  I was lucky enough to have parents who cared about me, but I was never strong enough to step up to somebody big and say, can I just sit down and meet with you?

So I want you all to practice that today at your tables.  Your challenge is to speak up, all right; to talk about yourselves proudly.  The toughest thing for you to do -- and one of the things I tell my mentees at the White House is that if you can walk into the State Room of the White House and look the First Lady in the eye and say, hello, my name is X and this is who I am, then you can do anything, because nothing will be more scary than that, right?

So practice it.  And the more you practice it, the more you’ll get comfortable with it.  And it’s that first impression that makes a difference.  If you can talk about yourself with confidence, you’re going to turn that light off in somebody’s head, and they’re going to say, whoa, I want to know more about that young person.
    
And the last thing I want to ask you all to do is to take this experience and use it to bring somebody else along.  You know, in every phase of my life, whether I was in high school or Princeton or Harvard or working for the city or working at the hospital, I was always looking for somebody to mentor.  I was looking for a way to reach out into my neighborhood and my community and pull somebody else along with me, because I thought, there but for the grace of God go I.  I know I could be in a different situation from somebody else.  So my job is to bring other people along. 

That's your job, too.  It’s not enough that you’re lucky, right?  You all are mentors today.  You’ve got a cousin, a niece, a neighbor, a nephew.  You’ve got somebody in your lives that are watching you today.  So start practicing being a mentor, because the one thing it’ll do is it’ll make you act better if you’ve got somebody looking at you, right?

So that's my ask for you today.  I want you all to speak up.  I want you to make sure you’re talking about yourselves today at your tables, asking questions.  Don’t be shy.  And when you leave here, take this experience with you and find your mentors and find the person that you’re going to mentor.  Can you all promise me that?

And other than that, just have fun.  Breathe.  Everyone, breathe, okay.  Is there breathing going on?  All the mentors, is there breathing at your tables?  Okay, let’s shake it off, and we’re ready to have some fun, have some conversation. 

All right, you all, thank you for being here.  And I am so proud of you all.  Thanks so much.  (Applause.)

END
1:06 P.M. EDT

Remarks by the First Lady at Student Forum in Detroit

Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan

11:19 A.M. EDT

MRS. OBAMA:  Wow!  (Applause.)  Detroit!  (Applause.)  This is pretty amazing.  Oh, my goodness.  Thank you so much.  Thank you, everybody.  It is so good to be here at Wayne State University!  (Applause.)  Thank you to the Wayne State family for hosting me on this remarkable campus in the heart of this proud city.  I’m just so honored. I want to thank Cherry for that kind and amazing introduction.  Let’s give her a round of applause.  (Applause.)

And I also have to thank a few other people, too.  I want to thank Governor Granholm -- (applause), Representative Kilpatrick -- (applause), Mayor Bing -- (applause.)  I want to thank Dr. Jay Noren, who’s the President of Wayne State.  (Applause.)  He made all this possible.  I also have to thank the Marching Crusaders from MLK Senior High School -- (applause) -- and of course one of my favorite entertainers, singers -- she’s powerful, she reminds you of what singing really is, Kimberly Locke.  Let’s give them all a wonderful hand.  Thank you for their performances.  (Applause.)  And we also have to thank all of the amazing mentors who showed up, who flew in from all over the country to be here.  Let’s give them another round of applause for our mentors.  (Applause.)
 
And I also want to acknowledge everyone who’s joined us from Selfridge Air National Guard Base.  I want to thank you all for your service to our country.  We are, as always, so grateful and proud of the work that you do.
 
And last but not least, I want to thank all the students, all the students for coming here, for being here -- (applause) -- for being out in the heat, for standing, for sweating.  Some of you, I know you’re fainting a little bit.  Get some water, but we’re here together.  It is beautiful.  
 
I am thrilled to be here.  I’ve wanted to come here from day one, and I am honored to be with all of you.  The remarkable men and women that you just saw up here a few moments ago that served on the panel who were mentoring, they’ve all flown here today, and we’re all here because we care so deeply about your futures.  Listen up.  We care about your future and the future that we all share.  That's why we’re here.
 
And I know that focusing on the future can be hard when times are tough.  And in Detroit, in the state of Michigan, it goes without saying that times here have been tough.  For the past several years, it has been tough everywhere in the country.  But this city in particular has known its share of hard times.  In recent years, you’ve seen jobs disappear, neighborhoods divide, schools deteriorate more than in any other city in America.  And even more recently, you’ve experienced more grieving than any one city should have to bear.
 
So let me tell you something, the last thing any of you need is someone to come here and tick off statistics; to tell you what you already know is going on in your own lives; or to have somebody write another story about what’s wrong with Detroit.
 
And let me say that is not why I’m here.  I am here because I know something that I want everyone in America to know -- and that there is a brighter, better future ahead for Detroit, for Michigan, for America.  (Applause.) 
 
And let me tell you why I know this -- because I’m looking at our future right now.  It is all of you.  I’m looking at it.  And it is a beautiful sight.  I wanted to come here for the same reason that folks always call and will call this city home, because if you ask anyone here why they stay, even times are tough, they’ll say, look around, look at all we’re doing to move Detroit forward to reinvent and redefine what it means to live in this great city.  They’ll tell you that the true worth of a community isn’t just in what you see when you drive around -- it’s in the goodness of its people.
 
And there are so many good people here.  (Applause.)  Everyday there are heroes who wake up early, they kiss their kids goodbye, and they catch the first bus to work.  Everywhere there are young people who are working hard, and they’re getting good grades, and they’re helping their families.  Everywhere there are neighbors who are rolling up their sleeves and taking care of their neighborhoods in their spare time.  There are students everywhere here who stay up late just to earn their degrees.  Thousands and thousands of good people who love this city, who are proud of their community, and believe there is no action too small or too simple to make a difference.
 
So despite what some may think they know about this city, what I know is there is plenty of hope here.  There’s plenty of hope -- (applause) -- because what you all have to know is despite everything that’s changed here, this is still the city where men clocked in to factories every day and built from scratch the greatest middle class the world has ever known.  (Applause.)
 
This is still the city where women rolled up their sleeves and clocked in, too, and they helped build an arsenal of democracy that led this world to freedom.
 
And this is still a city of brave, bold, and determined Americans; a city where clever and courageous people come up with fresh new ideas to re-imagine and revitalize life here each and every day.
 
So our next chapter –- Detroit’s next chapter, Michigan’s next chapter, America’s next chapter –- is waiting to be written.  And it will be written by each and every one of you, because your future, your city’s future, this country’s future will look exactly like what each of you wants it to look like.
 
And that’s what I believe.  And that’s why I am here.  Young people, I am asking you to embrace that responsibility to be our future.
 
Now, let me tell you, I know that is a lot to ask, given all that many of you have been through.  After all, the truth is, young folks, you didn’t do anything to get our economy in the state it’s been in.  You all didn’t make the decisions that brought us to this point.  I know that.  So you have every right to say in your mind, “It’s not my fault.  What can I do?  I’ve got enough to worry about.”
 
No one would blame you for feeling like no one’s listening, like you’ve been given up on.  No one would blame you for choosing just to look out for yourselves.  I get that.  We all get that, right?
 
But I hope of all hopes that you don’t feel that way, because there is a real truth out there, and that is there are a lot of people listening.  I am listening.  My husband is listening.  (Applause.)  The folks who are joining me here today, we are all listening.  There are so many people who haven’t given up on you.  There are so many people here who will always believe that you can do this.  And there are so many people here who are counting on you all.
 
So I hope we’re here because we want you to feel energized.  We need you all to feel energized.  And I hope you all recognize the possibilities that are out there waiting for you.  I hope you realize how much potential you have, and how capable you are of living up to that potential.
 
But the thing I want to tell you is that the simplest and surest way for you to live up to that potential is to do just one thing -- and that's keep focusing on your education.  (Applause.)  That’s right, that's it:  Keep focusing on your education.  That is your job.  Not playing video games, not shooting hoops, not dropping beats, not talking about how you’re going to make it big.  See, there’s a time and place for all that.  There really is.
 
But, if you’re looking for the secret of success -- do you want to know the secret?  (Applause.)  You’ve got to realize that there is no secret.  It is your education, plain and simple.  It’s mastering math and science.  It’s learning to write well.  It is learning to think for yourself and coming up with your own ideas and your arguments, and learning how to express that.
 
That is what has made the difference for me.  That’s what the -- made the difference for my husband.  That’s what’s made the difference for so many successful people.  The folks who were on this stage, we are only where we are today because of the education we received.  That's the secret.
 
My husband wasn’t born a President.  He didn’t grow up with a lot of money.  He didn’t even grow up knowing his father.  He was no more talented or gifted than any one of you here.  His life could have taken any turn.  But what he did have was someone who believed in him and pushed him to work hard and do his best.
 
See, when Barack was young, he and his mother lived overseas for a time, and she didn’t have a lot of money to send him to fancy schools where the other American kids were going.  She didn’t let that stop her from giving him everything she could to succeed.
 
So you know what she did?  She woke Barack Obama up at 4:30 every morning, five days a week, just to go over his lessons with him before he went to school, and before she went to work.  So yeah, he’d complain, he didn’t like it, he tried to find an excuse to keep sleeping -- sleep is good -- but she wouldn’t let him.  Barack’s mother wouldn’t give in.  She’d just say, “You know, this is no picnic for me either, buddy.”  (Laughter.)
 
And it’s because she made sure he was getting what he needed for his education; it’s because she sacrificed, day after day, week after week; that he had every chance –- every shot –- to someday become the President of the United States of America.  (Applause.)  Look, folks, it’s education.
 
My upbringing was a little bit different from his.  I grew up in the Midwest, like you.  Grew up on the South Side of Chicago, in a community just like many of yours.  It was a community where people often struggled to make ends meet.  But folks worked hard, they looked out for each another, and they always rallied around their kids.
 
I was blessed to have two parents who worked to give me and my brother everything they never had.  My father, all his life, was a shift worker at the water plant.  My mother stayed at home and helped raise me and my brother.  And it’s because they did what they did that we were the first in our immediate family to go to college.  And that made all the difference in the world.
 
And I’m sure, looking out at all of you, that many of you have similar stories as mine -- stories of parents and grandparents who wanted something more for you, so they saved and they sacrificed so that you could have opportunities they never could have imagined for themselves.
 
I imagine that right now there are some of you here at Wayne State who are the first in your families to make it to college.  Am I right?  (Applause.)  And I’m sure there are some high school students here who are going to be the first from their families to attend college, right?  (Applause.)  
 
Look, and I know what a big responsibility that is to shoulder.  I know it’s tough to think about finishing school when the odds say you won’t.  I know it’s tough not to feel guilty about earning your education and moving on when maybe your family might have larger issues at home.  I know it’s tough to try and live up to the potential you know you have inside when there is always something to undercut you; or someone who’s ready to underestimate you. 
 
But the simple fact that you are all here shows that you’re already beating those odds.  You are already making a way out of no way.  You’ve got to know that.  All of you are already succeeding.
 
So I’m just here to tell you to keep going.  And let me tell you something, if you’re not doing everything you could be doing to succeed in school today, then you all have to push yourselves.  You have to.  You have to take responsibility for your education and for your future.  And let me just say this, it’s not always going to be easy.  You won’t always get credit for what you do.
 
And I know that can be frustrating, especially when your generation has grown up in a popular culture that doesn’t exactly value all your hard work and commitment, but instead it glorifies easy answers, and instant gratification, and quick celebrity.  It’s a culture that tells us that our lives should be easy, that we can have everything we want right now without a lot of effort; that struggle and sacrifice aren’t necessary for success.
 
But that’s not how life really works.  And you all know that.  You know that businesses don’t really succeed without hard work and serious investments to produce quality products.  We know that our economy doesn’t really prosper when folks focus on easy credit, and get-rich-quick schemes, or promises that living beyond our means is okay.  And we know that our leaders don’t really become leaders without running into obstacles and setbacks along the way. My husband has certainly had his share.
 
The truth is few things worth achieving happen in an instant.  And the greatest value is found in the greatest effort.  Embracing our challenges, and not shrinking from them, is the surest way to succeed -- and it is the only way to become what we’re truly meant to be.
 
So students, I want you to keep that in mind.  Your education is the surest way to your success.  But even though you’ve got teachers and principals and families now who believe in you, you won’t always have someone to push you.  So that means you’ve got to push yourselves and you’ve got to push each other, even when it’s hard.
 
Some of you may be in schools that aren’t the best shape –- but that can’t stop you from hitting the books when you get home.  That’s on you.  (Applause.)
 
Some of you may not have many role models to look up to –- but that shouldn’t keep you from being a role model for somebody else.  That’s on you.
 
Some of you may feel weighed down by other people’s low expectations for you.  But that cannot stop you from breaking free; from setting high expectations for yourselves; from exceeding those expectations and proving people wrong.  That’s on you.
 
Look, young folks, there is so much in life that you can’t control.  But these are the things you can.  So please don’t ever let anyone tell you your destiny is already decided for you.  Don't do that.  You tell them that your destiny is for you to decide.  Don’t ever let anybody tell you that you can’t do something.  You tell them what?  “Yes we can.”  That's what you tell them.  (Applause.)
 
And as you take responsibility for yourselves, I also want you to think about taking responsibility for others and for your own community. 
 
So yeah, pay attention in class, throw yourselves into getting your education.  But nudge your buddy, that friend, you know?  Make sure that he or she is focused, too.  Help them through, as well.
 
Yeah, I want you all to take that trip to Eastern Market, get healthy, fresh, food if you’ve got a car.  But offer to get some for somebody who doesn’t, for an elderly neighbor who can’t get there.  That's what I want you to do.  (Applause.) 
 
Yeah, take some pride in keeping your block as clean, as safe as you can.  But help your friends take care of their blocks, too.
 
Fight for every inch of your future.  But take a little time each week to lift up the families, and neighbors, and schools that need your help today.
 
And one other thing.  As you push forward with your education, both inside and outside of the classroom, I want you all to consider this.  Consider the wider world out there, too.  We live in a world.  And think about how you can engage broadly with other people and other cultures around the world, embracing your place as part of a big, powerful, young, global generation.
 
Now, that may sound strange when there’s so much to do right here at home.  But if the opportunity ever arises for any of you to participate in exchange programs, a study abroad program, maybe even travel abroad, volunteer for a short time -- that is my one regret that I didn’t do when I was young -- I would urge you to try to do that.
 
It’ll advance your education; it will expand your sense of possibilities; and it will make you more competitive for the jobs of the future.
 
But more importantly it will also show you just how much we all have in common –- no matter where we live in the world.
 
And as First Lady, I’ve made it a point to spend time with young people your age when I visit other countries. 
I make it a point to do that.  And what is so remarkable is that no matter where I go, or who they are, they’re so much like you.
 
Young people around the world, they share similar worries, similar frustrations.  But you all share similar hopes and dreams.  And what’s most amazing is you are all so eager and willing to make a difference.  And that is what gives me hope.  If we hope to solve the most pressing challenges in the world, we’re going to have to adopt the perspective of young people, a perspective that reminds us all that we have more in common than we think, because in times of tension, it’s easy for us to slip into focusing only on what makes us different –- things like color and class –- when all that does is deepen mistrust and keep us from working together. 
 
But we are all in this together.  That's the truth.  Young, old; black, white; Hispanic, Asian, Arab-American; city, suburb; both sides of 8 Mile -- (applause) -- none of us can fully succeed without one another.
 
And it’s times like these that require us to put our differences aside, and focus on what we have in common -- things like pride in where we live.
 
So we’re looking to you.  We’re looking to your idealism, your optimism, your willingness to look at things in a new and fresh way.  We need you to rebuild those bridges, to restore that understanding, to renew that trust -- not just here in America but around the world.
 
So one last thing before I go.  Here’s what I want you all to remember:  In life, there are two kinds of people:  those who give up, and those who don’t.  And it’s the folks who don’t who make all the difference.  And I believe in my heart, which is why I’m here, that you all are those special people.  You are the ones really that we’ve been waiting for. 
 
So apply yourselves, young people.  Listen to me.  Apply yourselves.  Show us how it’s done.  You all have to study hard.  Can you do that?  Can you dream big?  (Applause.)  Can you hope deeply?  Never give up, because we will never give up on you.  We have got your backs.  We’re rooting for you, and sometimes you need to hear that.  Sometimes you just need to know that big, important people out there are rooting for you.  We believe in you all, and we will keep working for you as long as you keep working for us.
So thank you so much.  You all take care.  Be strong. (Applause.)
 
 

END
11:42 A.M. EDT

Remarks by the President at First Fundraising Reception for Barbara Boxer and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee

Fairmont Hotel, San Francisco, California

6:11 P.M. PDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, hello, everyone.  (Applause.)  How’s it going, California?  (Applause.) 

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Love you!

THE PRESIDENT:  Love you back.  (Laughter.)  This is a good-looking crowd.  (Applause.)

SENATOR BOXER:  That’s Nancy’s granddaughter, Isabella -- Nancy Pelosi.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, she’s just precious, and I know her pretty well.  (Laughter.)  Hey, mom, how are you?

Well, it is so nice to see everybody.  Thank you for the wonderful welcome and the genuine San Francisco weather.  (Laughter.)  I mean, I wouldn’t have wanted to come here and it was all sunny and bright.  (Laughter.)  No, that's not the way it’s supposed to work.   

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  You rock, Barack!

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  (Applause.) 

We just flew in today from Washington, and I have to say that we've got a lot on our plate right now, so I don't travel for just anybody.  But when it comes to Barbara Boxer, I’m a lot like many of you, which is if she calls and she says, “I need some help,” then we’re going to give her some help, because she has helped millions of Californians and millions of Americans all across the country.  (Applause.)  And we’re going to make sure that Barbara Boxer is in office for an awful long time to come, whether Stu likes it or not.  (Applause.)

I was talking to Stu in the back, and, you know, when you’re a senator, an elected official, right around this time of year you basically become a widow or a widower -- (laughter) -- until your spouse is finished with their race.  But Stu has been so supportive because he knows the value of what Barbara does each and every day.

Now, let’s face it, this has been as tough a year and a half as any year and a half in our history since the 1930s.  When I came into office, when I was sworn in, we were on the brink of what many economists thought might be another Great Depression.  At minimum, we knew we were going to have the worst recession since the Great Depression.  We were losing 750,000 jobs per month.  The economy had contracted 6.5 percent.  I had, wrapped like a gift, a welcoming gift for me a $1.3 trillion deficit.  

And so we had to act quickly.  And that meant that right away we had to make sure that we put in place mechanisms to put people back to work, to get the economy growing again.  We had to cut taxes for small businesses and for individuals so that they would boost demand in the economy that was caving.  It meant that we had to make sure that unemployment insurance and COBRA was in place so that people would have some safety net under them when they lost a job through no means of their own -- through no fault of their own.  (Applause.)

But it also meant that we had to make investments so that we would create a foundation for long-term growth in this country.  See, we couldn’t keep on doing the same things we had been doing.  It wasn’t good enough just to go back to the status quo ante.  We couldn’t have a situation in which growth was premised on everybody maxing out on their credit cards, and taking out home equity loans, and getting deeper and deeper into debt, and wild speculation on the financial markets.

What we had to do was to go back to basics and think about what has made America great.  Well, one of the things that has always made America great is innovation.  And so through our Recovery Act, we made the largest investment in clean energy in our history. 

And we made the largest investment in science.  (Applause.) And while we were making all those investments in research and development, we also elevated science once again.  (Applause.) And we said we would make decisions on stem cell research and other issues based on what science tell us.  And so we had an innovation agenda. 

Then we had an agenda with respect to making sure that we made the health care system more efficient.  (Applause.)  And so even before we got into the health care bill, we invested in information technology so that when you go to the doctor, you don't have to take five tests.  We’re just going to take one test, and then you’re going to e-mail the five tests to everybody else -- and by the way, you won’t get charged for five tests, or Medicaid or Medicare won’t get charged for five tests.

And we thought about how could we restore an auto industry that was on the brink.  But again, we couldn’t go back to the status quo.  So what we did was we said, you know what, we’re going to make sure that GM and Chrysler aren’t liquidated, but we’re going to make sure that we invest in advanced battery technologies and hybrid technologies so that we can start seeing a future of plug-in hybrids that get 150 miles a gallon so that we can start breaking our dependence on foreign oil.  (Applause.)

And we said, you know, part of the innovation economy is making sure every child in America has a decent education -- (applause) -- which meant we made the largest investment -- we made the largest investment in education in our history, not only at the K-12 level but also at the community college level and at the university level. 

And then we said, you know we -- if we’re going to innovate and grow, we’ve got to have great infrastructure.  And so we passed the largest investment in infrastructure since Eisenhower built the Interstate Highway System. 

And we said if we’re going to cut taxes, let’s make sure we cut taxes for the right folks.  And so as a consequence, we passed the most progressive tax cut in our history to make sure that people who really needed it got the benefits.  (Applause.)

Now, California, I want you to understand we did all that in the first month.  (Laughter.)  That was in the first month.  (Applause.)  And in the first couple of months, we had already provided 4 million more children health care under the Children’s Health Insurance bill.  We had already passed legislation to make sure that a basic principle that women, if they’re working on the job, should get paid the same for doing the work that a man is doing.  (Applause.)

In the first six months, we had already made sure that tobacco companies couldn’t market to our kids -- (applause) -- and the toughest credit card regulations in our history -- and legislation to prevent housing fraud.  We did that in the first six months.

But that wasn’t enough to start building this new foundation for our economy.  So we just kept on going.  And as Barbara mentioned, we ended up doing something that seven Congresses and seven Presidents have failed to do -- had failed to do for a century, and that is start providing basic security for all Americans when it comes to their health care, because in a country this wealthy, no person should go bankrupt because they get sick, no child should go unattended if they’ve got a chronic illness.  That is a basic principle of America.  (Applause.)

And by the way, it turns out that by making these changes, we can actually make the health care system more efficient, and drive down costs, and drive down premiums, and help small businesses.

Now, we decided that's still not enough in order to make the changes that are necessary.  And so we said we’re never going to have the situation again where taxpayers are forced to choose between the entire economy collapsing or having to bail out a bunch of folks who’ve been irresponsible. 

So we decided we had to create a financial regulatory structure that continues to affirm the power of the free market, that recognizes that financial institutions have to be there to be able to finance small businesses and individuals buying homes and cars.  And that's all good.  That's part of what makes America so creative and so dynamic; that drives our growth.

But there have got to be basic rules of the road so consumers aren’t getting cheated; so people aren’t missing the fine print and suddenly find themselves way overextended; so that you don't have financial instruments that can blow the entire economy apart.

And so after the -- over the last several months, after we finished with health care, we’ve tackled financial regulatory reform.  We’ve now passed it through the House.  We’ve now passed it through the Senate.  And we are going to pass it through Congress.  And then I’m going to sign that bill to make sure that we don't have taxpayer bailouts for irresponsible behavior in our financial sector.  (Applause.)

All right, so that's not a bad 18 months’ work.  (Laughter.)  That's pretty good.  But here’s the thing.  I couldn’t have done that by myself.  I mean, one of the things you learn as President is because you’ve got this title, and, you know, there’s the plane and the helicopter, and all that stuff -- (laughter) -- that people expect you to solve problems.  And when things go wrong, they’re definitely going to blame you.  If things go right, occasionally you might get the credit.

But the truth is, is that in order for us to succeed in bringing about the kind of America where everybody has opportunity, where our economy is growing and innovative and more stable, where our children are getting a good education, where we’ve got a sound health care system, where we’ve got an actual energy agenda, I can’t do that by myself.  I’ve got to have strong allies.  I’ve got to have people with passion.  I’ve got to have people who are willing to fight for what’s right.  I’ve got to have people who always have the voices of their constituents in their ear, and understand and remember, no matter how long they’ve been in Washington, who it is that they’re fighting for.

And nobody is a better example of that than Barbara Boxer, which is why you are here today.  (Applause.)  On every fight that needed to be fought, Barbara was there, standing right there next to me, and sometimes we were in a foxhole together, and shots were being fired.  (Laughter.)  That's just a figure of speech.  I don't want the Secret Service -- (laughter) -- getting excited. 

But Barbara is always there.  She’s been there for you.  She’s been there for California.  She’s been there for me.  And now --

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  -- Boxer in your corner.

THE PRESIDENT: -- we’ve got a Boxer in our corner.  That's a good one.  (Laughter.)

So now we’ve got to be there for her, because the truth is our work is not yet done.  And I actually visited the Republican Caucus today, and it was a very warm and cuddly meeting.  (Laughter.)  But the truth is I want the country to come together in dealing with some big problems that we’ve still got.  And Barbara wants the same thing.  (Applause.)

And here’s what I told them.  I’m not going to get into all the details of the meeting, because they wanted the meeting closed.  We had a meeting that was open with the Republican Caucus on the House side, and I had a lot of fun there.  (Laughter.)  So -- but basically I said we’ve done some good work.  Unfortunately sometimes we haven’t gotten a lot of help from the other side of the aisle.  But we still are hopeful that you are willing to put party below what needs to be done for the American people. 

And here are some areas where we know we’ve got to make progress.  We know we still have to make progress on energy.  This situation in the Gulf is heartbreaking.  And the day that it was reported to me that this riser and the drilling situation had blown, I said to my team, we’ve got to put every bit of energy, time, all the resources we’ve got to make sure that we deal with this.

And we’ve now got over a thousand people from the federal government deployed down there.  We are doing everything we can to contain the damage.  But the fact of the matter is, is that not only do we have to revisit how these oil companies are operating, to make sure that they're operating in a safe and effective way.  But we’ve also still got this overarching issue, even if you hadn’t seen the catastrophe down in the Gulf, the reason that folks are now having to go down a mile deep into the ocean, and then another mile drilling into the ground below that is because the easy oilfields and oil wells are gone, or they're starting to diminish.

And what does that tell us?  That tells us that we’ve got to have a long-term energy strategy in this country.  (Applause.)  And we’ve got to start -- we’ve got to start cultivating -- we’ve got to start cultivating solar and wind and biodiesel.  And we’ve got to increase energy efficiency across our economy in our buildings and our automobiles.

And we’ve got to also make sure that -- (interruption) --oops.  (Laughter.)  You don't agree.  (Laughter.)  And we’ve got to make sure that as these technologies develop, the government is not creating these technologies, but it’s supporting them, because that's how the railroads got built, and that's how the Internet got developed, for there was some measure of government support.

And we’ve got to stop subsidizing those industries that are not going to lead us to the future.  (Applause.)  Now -- so I said to the Republicans, join with me.  There’s been some good work done by John Kerry and Joe Lieberman and Lindsey Graham.  Let’s go.  Let’s not wait.  Let’s show the American people that in the midst of this crisis, all of us are opening our eyes to what’s necessary to fulfill the promise to our children and our grandchildren.

And then I talked about immigration reform, another area where there are a lot of passions right now.  (Applause.)  And I said -- I said to them -- I said to them, look, I disagree with this Arizona law.  I think it’s a bad idea.  (Applause.)  But I also said I understand the frustration of folks in Arizona.  I understand they're feeling that somehow the federal government can't control the border effectively, and I’m willing to work with my Republican colleagues to create a stronger border here in California, New Mexico and in Arizona.  I think everybody understands that that's an important investment to make.

And I told them if we actually want to solve the problem, as opposed to just score political points, then we can’t just have one leg of the stool.  We’ve got to make sure that we’re dealing with employers who are dealing in unscrupulous ways with undocumented workers.  (Applause.)  We’ve got -- and for the millions of folks who are already here, we’ve got to say to them, you’ve got to take responsibility.  You broke the law, you’ve got to pay a fine.  You’ve got to pay your back taxes.  You’ve got to learn English.  You’ve got to go to the back of the line, but here’s a pathway whereby you can get right with our community and contribute to the larger American project.  (Applause.)

Those are issues that we’re going to have some legitimate differences on.  Some of those differences were expressed in the Republican Caucus.  And I expressed my opinions, as well.  But you know what, if you talk to most Americans on these issues, they're not thinking Republican, they’re not thinking Democrat, they’re not thinking liberal, they’re not thinking conservative.  They’re thinking, what’s common sense, what’s decent, what’s right, what does the science say, what do the facts say, what will work, what won’t work?  Solve the problem.

And that’s what I'm prepared to do.  And that’s what Barbara Boxer has always stood for.  (Applause.)  And that’s why it’s so important that you’re here tonight, because that’s the kind of politics that is going to create a better future for California, that’s the kind of politics that’s going to create a better future for the nation.  And that’s why I know that you are going to make sure that Barbara Boxer gets another six years in the United States Senate.  (Applause.)

Thank you very much, everybody.  God bless you.  (Applause.)

END
6:29 P.M. PDT