The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama Announces Smart Cities – Smart Growth Presidential Trade Mission to the People’s Republic of China

President Barack Obama today announced the designation of the Smart Cities – Smart Growth Business Development Mission as a Presidential Trade Mission to the People’s Republic of China.

The Honorable Penny Pritzker, Secretary of Commerce, and The Honorable Ernest Moniz, Secretary of Energy, will lead the trade mission.

Members of the Presidential Trade Mission:

The Honorable Max Baucus, Ambassador of the United States of America to the People’s Republic of China, Department of State.

The Honorable Penny Pritzker, Secretary of Commerce, and the Honorable Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Deputy Secretary of Energy, will lead the trade mission.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

On-the-Record Conference Call on the President's Trip to Jamaica and Panama

ON-THE-RECORD CONFERENCE CALL
BY BEN RHODES, NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR FOR STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS;
AND RICARDO ZUÑIGA, NSC SENIOR DIRECTOR FOR WESTERN HEMISPHERE AFFAIRS
ON THE PRESIDENT’S TRIP TO JAMAICA AND PANAMA

Via Telephone

9:23 A.M. EDT

MS. MEEHAN:  Hi, everybody, this is Bernadette.  Thanks so much for joining us.  This is an on-the-record call to preview the President’s travel to Kingston, Jamaica and Panama City, Panama.  There is no embargo for this call.  We have two senior administration officials with us today.  The first is Ben Rhodes, the Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications; and the second is Ricardo Zuñiga, Senior Director for Western Hemisphere Affairs at the National Security Council.

And with that, I will turn it over to Ben Rhodes.

MR. RHODES:  Great.  Thanks, everybody.  I'll just kind of run through our schedule and a number of the objectives associated with the summit, but then turn it over to Ricardo to give you some more background on the two stops.

The first stop, as Bernadette mentioned, is in Kingston, Jamaica.  This is a trip to meet with the Jamaicans, but also to have a summit with the CARICOM countries.  Those are the 14 different countries within the CARICOM grouping of nations.  And so the President will begin on Thursday, April 9th -- after arriving and spending the night on the 8th, he will begin his day on Thursday, April 9th, with a bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Portia Simpson-Miller of Jamaica.  That will be followed by the CARICOM summit.

Then, after the CARICOM summit, the President will have a town hall with young leaders from across the region.  This is similar to the types of events you’ve seen him do in Southeast Asia and Africa, where he will be able to focus on our commitment to partnering with the youth of the region on behalf of their aspirations and our shared interests.  Then there will be a wreath-laying ceremony, and then we will depart Kingston that night.

I'll just briefly say that, again, this is an important opportunity for us to meet with a significant number of our neighbors with whom we share interests both in the hemisphere, and bilaterally and multilaterally.  Ricardo can talk through the agenda in greater detail, but we'll certainly be discussing our shared cooperation on issues associated with security, where we have a range of cooperation with the CARICOM countries; also energy, where we are looking to continually deepen our relationship with the Caribbean and can play an important role in enhancing the energy security of the region.

Then we will be moving on to Panama, which is hosting the Summit of the Americas.  On Friday, the 10th, the President has a number of events that are associated with the summit, leading into the summit. 

First, in the morning, the President will have a bilateral meeting with President Juan Carlos Varela of Panama, obviously a close friend and partner of the United States in the Americas.  He will then drop by a meeting of CEOs who are partnering with us on our 100,000 Strong in the Americas initiative.  This is an effort to promote two-way educational exchange in the hemisphere, one of our signature people-to-people efforts in the world, and the priority in the hemisphere where many of the leaders have focused on the need to enhance higher education, including through exchanges, with more American students going to Latin America and more Latin American students coming to study here in the United States.

Following that meeting, the President will meet with the different Presidents of the SICA grouping of nations.  That's the Central American nations, where we have a very significant $1 billion security and capacity-building initiative, which Ricardo can talk through with you.  Again, our focus there is on building the capacity of our partners in Central America as they deal with a range of security challenges and look to enhance economic development for their people, which is very much in our shared interests.

Following that meeting with the SICA Presidents, the President will participate in a CEO Summit of the Americas.  He will be joined in an event, a moderated discussion by the Presidents of Panama, Mexico and Brazil, where they’ll be able to discuss their shared efforts to promote economic growth and job creation in the hemisphere.  And many of you who have covered our Latin America policy in the past know that promoting U.S. exports in the region has been fundamental to both our broader economic strategy and our approach to the region.

Following that CEO summit, the President will attend a civil society forum.  This is an important initiative that the Panamanians are leading and hosting that brings together civil society from across the region to have a discussion about the different challenges civil society faces, but also the opportunities for governments to partner with civil society.

The President will make remarks at that broader civil society forum.  Then he will participate in a smaller roundtable with civil society leaders from across the region.  He will be joined in that roundtable by the leaders of Costa Rica and Uruguay, again, speaking to the regional diversity of civil society and the shared commitment among different leaders within the hemisphere, to civil society and engagement.  That concludes the pre-program, if you will. 

And then that evening, the President will attend the inauguration ceremony and leaders dinner associated with the Summit of the Americas.  And then on Saturday, April 11th, he will attend the various plenary sessions and leaders meetings.  And then he will conclude his visit with his traditional press conference to close the summit. 

I will turn it over to Ricardo to talk through the CARICOM Summit agenda in some greater detail, and then we’ll take your questions.

MR. ZUÑIGA:  So thanks very much, Ben.  So just from the top.  This is a President that’s arriving at the Summit of Americas with a very significant expansion of our relationship with the Americas, particularly over the last year, and significant progress that includes a reformulation of our relationship with Cuba after 50 years of isolation, of new policy of engagement.

He’s going to be arriving after having executed the executive actions on immigration affecting citizens from particularly Central America and Mexico, but citizens from throughout the world and the region, and after announcing $1 billion in foreign assistance for Central America to help the nations of Central America deal with the factors that have contributed to significant immigration from the region. 

So we expect that we’re going to have a number of both diplomatic and just regular practical issues that we’re going to be able to address during the summit and in the President’s visit to Jamaica.

So in Jamaica, we’re going to have the first visit by a President since 1982.  And we’ll have an opportunity to speak with Prime Minister Miller about -- Portia Simpson-Miller -- about our strong support for Jamaica’s work to deal with a debt crisis, with a physical crisis, and its strong performance over the last two years in working with the IMF, the World Bank, and others to address that, in support of the prosperity and security of her citizens. 

With the CARICOM leaders, we’re going to have an opportunity to speak about some issues that we’ve dealt with to a significant degree already, including security and our cooperation through the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative.  But also, an issue that the Vice President brought together a summit of Caribbean leaders in January related to energy security and our shared efforts to promote a more diverse, cleaner, and more sustainable energy future for the Caribbean.  So again, a very practical agenda there that we’re going to build on some of the work that we’ve already undertaken with them. 

In Panama, and at the summit, we see this as an opportunity to work closely with partners throughout the Americas to make sure that our summit upholds a common commitment to democracy, human rights, and inclusive economic development. 

We have, as we have in the past, had a very pragmatic summit agenda that is focused on the kinds of issues that affect daily lives, but are ambitious and mobilize the combined potential of the region.  We congratulate the government of Panama for the organization of the summit and development of a strong agenda that is going to include discussion of energy, democratic governance, health, the environment, security, civil society, and migration.  These are issues that affect the daily lives of citizens of the Americas, and that’s why we wanted to make sure that we have an agenda that is more than diplomacy; it’s about practical matters that affect our citizens. 

In past summits, we’ve seen among other initiatives the launch of the Energy and Climate Partnership of the Americas; the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative; Connect 2022, which promoted electrical interconnection in the region; and the Small Business Network of Americas, which helps sustain more than 250,000 businesses throughout the region.

We also at this summit hope to have new regional efforts aimed at promoting educational exchanges, expanding economic opportunities -- particularly for women, promoting clean energy and climate change cooperation ahead of the very important COP meeting in Paris later this year.  We want to promote support for the Bali WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement.  We also are going to be working with other delegations to promote expanded access to broadband Internet.  And we want to ensure a permanent, meaningful role for civil society in future summits.

So, again, these are all areas that we think are going to have a practical impact and that are aimed at the kinds of initiatives that citizens will be able to feel and see as meaningful to their own lives.  As Ben mentioned, the President will participate in the CEO Summit along with the Presidents of Panama, Brazil, and Mexico to engage business leaders and discuss competitiveness and what we can do together to build a workforce that is going to promote broad-based growth and inclusive growth in the future.

The summit is also going to be a very important venue for us to highlight the work that we’re undertaking in Central America in partnership with Mexico, Colombia, the Inter-American Development Bank, and other key actors.  So the President is going to meet with the eight leaders of the Central American Integration System, or SICA, to discuss our strategy for engagement with Central America and the $1 billion request that I mentioned on the part of the President for assistance to deal with issues related to Central American economics -- excuse me, the economy, security and governance challenges that are faced by the governments of Central America.

So with that, why don’t we open it up to questions?

MR. RHODES:  Yes, and I’d just say one other thing just to kind of give one more piece of perspective.

This is our third summit, and we’ve been building a more positive environment in the Americas for several years now.  And as many of you know, we focus on a lot of different issues here.  Recently we’ve been very focused on Iran, on the threat of ISIL, and Ukraine.  But at the same time, I think what we’re building is a very significant series of initiatives within the hemisphere, and the President is very focused on ensuring that we are ambitious and having a concrete agenda here. 

And I think if you look at the opening to Cuba and the process of normalizing our relations, the Central American initiative that we’ve committed $1 billion to now; the Colombian peace process, which we have designated a special envoy to represent the United States at; our focus on energy security, and our 100,000 Strong in the Americas initiative, together with the broader economic and export promotion efforts that we’ve undertaken over the last several years -- the President has a clear legacy that he is aiming to build in the hemisphere that is focused on moving beyond some of the past divisiveness within the Americas, finding new ways to engage our partners on a basis of mutual interest and mutual respect, and making concrete progress on very profound security challenges, whether it’s promoting peace in Colombia or helping to stabilize a very difficult environment in Central America. 

So I think people can now see -- more so than they could, frankly, at the previous two summits -- what the outlines of our lasting agenda are in this hemisphere.  And this summit is a pivotal moment in our effort to demonstrate how we’re moving forward in all these areas.

So with that, we’ll move to questions.

Q    You mentioned of course the importance of normalization with Cuba, but did not say anything about the presence of Raul Castro at the summit.  Could you tell us more about what the President might be doing to solidify the U.S. outreach to Cuba?  Any planned meetings with Castro?  Bilats?  And how does the administration expect the recent sanctions against individuals in Venezuela to play out at the summit, given that President Maduro has several allies within Latin America who have joined him in portraying this as an aggressive move by the U.S.?

MR. RHODES:  Well, first of all, let me say that this is the first Summit of the Americas that Cuba is attending.  That, in its own right, is an important step forward in our view.  We, frankly, having gone through two previous summits, did not think it was constructive for the United States to continue to try to isolate Cuba from the broader community within the Americas.  Frankly, I think it only pointed to the failure of U.S. policy, because every time we showed up at the Summit of the Americas the question was not related to improving governance or even advancing democratic values; the question was why Cuba wasn’t at the Summit of the Americas. 

So part of the process of normalization included our support for and openness to Cuban participation at the summit.  This is something that Ricardo and I discussed with our Cuban counterparts over the course of the discussions that we had.  At the same time, we made very clear that just as there would be Cuban attendance at the summit, we felt it was very important that there be civil society participation at the summit, and that that include a broad diversity of civil society from across the region to include Cuba.  And it's very important that the Panamanians are hosting such a forum.

With respect to the interaction between the Presidents, I'm sure that President Obama will be interacting with President Castro at the summit events and as the leaders gather on the margins of those events.  We don’t have a formal bilateral meeting that we’re currently scheduling, but at the same time the way the summit of the Americas goes is there are many opportunities where we just have conversations, and we’ll certainly keep you updated as to any interactions the President has with Raul Castro.

I’d note what we’ve been doing through this process of pursuing normalization is having much more high-level diplomatic exchanges with the Cuban government to review a range of important issues, but also supporting very significant U.S. commercial business and people-to-people exchanges that we believe could be good for the Cuban people and good for the American people.  And we can discuss some of that in greater detail as well. 

Venezuela is certain to be on the agenda that the many leaders have coming into the summit.  That relates, frankly, to the challenging circumstances within Venezuela, which have been a focus for leaders across the region, not just the United States, for some years now, given our interest in seeing a stable and successful Venezuela that has greater opportunities for its people. 

Again, we certainly would expect the Venezuelan government to express its opposition to certain U.S. policies.  And again, I think our point would simply be the United States stands up for a set of values in every country in the world.  That support for universal values is not directed at or targeted against any one government, but rather it's simply the things that we believe in -- whether it's the ability of people to make decisions about their own governance, the ability of them to participate freely in the politics of their countries. 

And with respect to Venezuela, what we have supported is regional efforts in which our partners are also working to support dialogue within Venezuela and a greater sense of stability.  So we’ve also, at the same time, made it clear to the Venezuelan government that we’re open to continued dialogue with them so that we can address directly the issues that we’re concerned about, and encourage the type of cooperation with regional countries and the type of dialogue within Venezuela that we think can be constructive.

So it will certainly be an issue.  But again, what we’ll be making clear here is that we stand up for a set of universal values everywhere.  And with respect to Venezuela, frankly, we believe that a process of dialogue within the country and within the region is the best way to address the issues that have raised so many challenges within Venezuela and the region in recent years.

Q    Thank you very much for doing the call.  The President told NPR that he wanted to act quickly, I guess -- I don’t have the exact quote in front of me -- on the terror designation when the recommendation comes.  This, as you know better than anyone, has been a huge for the Cubans, understanding that the recommendation from the State Department, once accepted by the President, would still require 45 days of news cycle with the clock on. 

Do you expect that that recommendation would come to the President so that he could express his decision before this meeting?  And if not, what’s holding that up?  And what do you see as the timetable for opening embassies after the summit?  The talks have not gone as rapidly as some might have hoped in both capitals.

MR. RHODES:  So, Andrea, those will obviously be -- the SSOT list and the (inaudible) will be key issues with respect to the ongoing normalization process. 

First of all, when the President made his announcement on December 17th, one of the commitments that he made was to review Cuba’s presence on the State-Sponsored Terrorism List.  And his very clear direction to the State Department was to conduct that review as quickly as possible, but to do it thoroughly so that this is based on facts and that we have exhausted all the necessary lines of inquiry to reach a satisfactory conclusion. 

And again, as the President said in his interview, the State-Sponsored Terrorism List does not relate to whether or not we agree with everything a country does or whether we agree with its political system, or its foreign policy.  It's a very practical review as to whether or not a government is sponsoring terrorism.  And so the direction that he’s given to the State Department is to conduct the review from that perspective. 

We would expect that that review, since it's been ongoing for a period of months now, is nearing its conclusion.  But we, frankly, don’t control the precise timing of when the State Department makes a recommendation to the President, so we are waiting the State Department’s final recommendation. 

What will happen, so people are just familiar with the process, is that comes over here from Secretary Kerry reflecting the judgment of the State Department; then the President makes a determination about whether or not to accept and act upon that recommendation. 

The 45-day waiting -- the 45-day period that you referenced is after the President submits this to Congress, there is a 45- day clock during which time Congress can try to take action to essentially override the President’s determination.  So it's more in the vein of Congress having to take an action rather than having to validate a particular recommendation. 

But again, with respect to timing, I think this has been ongoing because it was initiated quickly after the President’s announcement.  So we expect it's likely in the final stages.  But we don’t control the timing; the State Department does.  And the President will have to receive that recommendation, which he has not yet, and then make a determination about whether or not to take a particular action.

With respect to the diplomatic relations, I think we’ve made good progress in the sense that, first of all, the two Presidents made a commitment to reestablish diplomatic relations in December.  They both publicly affirmed that commitment, and it was something that grew out of the conversations that Ricardo and I have had with our counterparts and the discussion that the two Presidents had on the phone. 

For the State Department and recs, of course, that initiated a very complicated set of negotiations.  It dealt with everything from practical questions about how our diplomats operate to more significant political questions about how we engage one another.  We’ve actually made good progress in working through a number of practical hurdles that had to be cleared, but we still have a little bit further to go in working through those issues -- because frankly, we want to make sure that when we are opening embassies, the Cubans here in Washington, in the United States and Havana, that we have those issues done right. 

And so certainly this will be a subject of discussion at the summit.  But I think what you’ll see is very broad support from within the Americas for the reestablishment of diplomatic relations between the United States and Cuba.  And so we’d expect there to be continued momentum towards that objective. 

And in the interim, we’re very hardened that as we have made policy changes -- so even as the SSOT process has gone on -- as we’ve made policy and regulatory changes to facilitate greater travel and commercial activity in Cuba, that’s led to much more significant high-level engagements from our government.  So, for instance, everyone from Roberta Jacobson to the State Department’s leading telecommunications advisor have been able to travel down to Cuba and engage in conversations about how to enhance our ability to engage the Cuban people.

But also, significant movement by U.S. businesses.  Recently, people noted that Airbnb is launching an initiative in Cuba that will facilitate greater travel, of course.  We’ve had a number of important commercial and congressional delegations travel to the island.  So all of this activity is part of normalization, and I think creates a positive sense of momentum.  And yes, I’d note that the NBA is going to be the first major professional sports league from the United States to send a delegation down there.  Personally, I'm a Steve Nash fan, so it’s good to see he’s finding very good ways to spend his time after his retirement.

Q    I just wanted to go back to the issue of the State Sponsors of Terrorism list.  Is the administration at this point ruling out that the timing would be -- of an announcement on this -- such recommendation would be coming before the summit?  And are you also ruling out that there will be any announcement on any reopening of embassies in time for the summit?

MR. RHODES:  I wouldn’t rule out anything with respect to the timing of the SSOT, simply because, Matt, we don’t control the timing.  So when we get the State Department’s recommendation, we can then make a determination about whether and how to move forward with that and to announce it publicly.

With respect to the opening of embassies, I would not anticipate that we will be formalizing the opening of embassies in advance of the summit.  It’s obviously something that is continuing to be the subject of conversation with the Cuban government.  I would anticipate that if there’s some interaction at the summit with the Cubans, this will come up because it’s the ongoing subject of conversation between our governments. 

But, again, we’re satisfied that that process is moving forward.  We want to make sure that when you have two countries that haven’t really spoken to each other like this in over 50 years, you have a lot of issues to work through as you aim to open up embassies, and that includes some very practical things like how our diplomats can operate in each country.  So I’m not ruling things out with respect to timing, although I would not anticipate that in advance to the summit we’d finalize the diplomatic relations process.

Q    I wanted to go back to the question of Venezuela, because the new U.S. approach to Cuba was welcomed in the region but the sanctions on Venezuela, the wording of the executive order did cause some concern and not just in Venezuela or Cuba.  Are you disappointed that countries in the region seem to be at odds with you over Venezuela and not pushing Maduro to clean up his human rights record?

MR. RHODES:  So the first thing I’ll say and then I’ll hand it to Ricardo here, Michelle, is that the wording, which got a lot of attention, is completely pro forma.  This is a language that we use in executive orders around the world.  So the United States does not believe that Venezuela poses some threat to our national security.  We, frankly, just have a framework for how we formalize these executive orders. 

I’d add that that the executive order was in response to congressional legislation that had been worked transparently for many months and, frankly, was not of a scale that in any way was aimed at targeting the Venezuelan government broadly or bringing about some type of dramatic change in terms of the government of Venezuela.  It was focused on a number of individuals who had been determined to be associated with human rights violations.  And we have executive orders like this around the world, and they’re a tool that allows us to have consequences associated with our support for universal values.

But I’ll turn it over to Ricardo to speak to the broad regional dynamic.

MR. ZUÑIGA:  So I think it’s also important to note that the situation inside Venezuela clearly is a matter of concern for its neighbors and for other countries in the region.  The South American governments have been involved in an effort for more than a year to try to promote an internal dialogue so that basically all the political forces in Venezuela are given an opportunity to participate in the democratic process, as should be the case.

There’s great concern also about the economic crisis currently afflicting Venezuela and the potential impact that can have not only for the countries that have benefited from Venezuela’s Petrocaribe oil assistance, but also for Venezuela’s neighbors. 

Look, I think the bottom line here is we have an interest in the success of Venezuela.  And Venezuela’s success, its prosperity, its security, its stability, its democracy -- we’re Venezuela’s largest trading partner.  We have an extensive and deep history between our countries and including a lot of family connections and so forth.  We don’t have any hostile designs on Venezuela.  On the contrary, we support the efforts of South American governments to promote a political resolution to the very significant challenges that have been affecting Venezuela, particularly over the last year.  A number of governments have expressed concern over the arrest of elected leaders by the government of Venezuela.  We think it’s important that we continue to work together to reaffirm regional values on democracy and human rights.  And that’s really the core of our approach to Venezuela.

Q    I have questions on businesses on Cuba.  Ben, you mentioned the atmosphere at the previous Summits of the Americas when Cuba wasn’t there and how that kind of overshadowed the situation and the agenda that the U.S. wanted to discuss.  Can you talk a little bit about how much the atmosphere at those previous summits led to the U.S. decision to restore diplomatic relations with Cuba? 

And then, on the business side, obviously there’s the CEO Summit and a focus on small business.  Commerce obviously seems to be a big part of this trip, and the President, of course, is not scheduled to visit the Panama Canal but he’ll be very close to it.  The Canal is expected to be -- or the bigger canal is expected to be opened next year, allowing bigger ships to come to the U.S. East Coast.  Is there a role for this summit in discussing how the U.S. can capitalize on that additional trade through the canal once it is expanded?

MR. RHODES:  Sure.  A few things there.  Let me just take the last piece first.  I should have added that we do anticipate the President won’t be able to visit the Canal while he is there.  Obviously, it’s one of the wonders of the world in terms of architectural achievement and promoting commerce in our relations with Panama. 

Circling back on the atmospherics, yes, I do think that the dynamic in the region informed to some extent the President’s decision to move forward with this process of normalization with Cuba.  That was not the only reason.  The principal reason was that we had a policy that had failed for 50 years to advance our interests and our values and our engagement with the Cuban people.  And we believe that the new approach of engaging the Cuban government and people will be better, frankly, for the lives of the Cuban people, it will allow them to access greater opportunity, and will be good for the United States and our citizens and businesses as well. 

But, yes, in the hemisphere, frankly, it made no sense that the United States consistently, essentially made the decision to isolate ourselves from the rest of the Americas because we were clinging to a policy that wasn’t working.  And the fact of the matter is some of the critics of our approach have said, well, if you just stuck it out for a few more years, the sanctions were just about to achieve their desired effect.  But that’s not at all what we saw, and part of the reason why is we were not joined in imposing those sanctions by any other country because no other country agreed with our approach.  And so when you are completely isolated in that manner, you’re compromising your interests not just with respect to Cuba but with respect to the Americas more broadly. 

So we would anticipate that this does help begin to remove significant impediment to having a more constructive engagement in the hemisphere because we demonstrated an openness to engage all of the countries in the Americas, and to include Cuba.  And, frankly, we would hope that that can help facilitate more constructive cooperation on areas where we may have common interests overlap with the Cubans -- things like counterterrorism, dealing with natural disasters, migration flows, promoting economic opportunity, but also in speaking up with other countries in the Americas for areas where we may have some differences with Cuba with respect to the promotion of human rights and support for the civil society, which will be on display at the summit.

With respect to the CEO Summit, Ricardo may want to say a word here.  I think what we have constantly focused on in our engagement with the Americas is promoting U.S. exports, reducing barriers to trade and commerce, and taking advantage of the shared infrastructure within the Americas so that we have a comparative benefit to other regions in the world.  And the Canal is certainly a part of that.  But Ricardo may want to add something.

MR. ZUÑIGA:  So I’ll just add a couple of points.  Number one is, certainly we expect that the President will talk about our emphasis on trade during the rest of this year -- in particular, our pursuit of high-standard agreements like TPP, which is going to be very important for a number of countries in the region and that is obviously going to help shape the global trading system for years to come. 

We’re also going to talk about the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement in Bali, where most of the countries in the Americas were strongly supportive of that agreement.  And we want to talk about the practicality of working together to enhance trade as much as possible.  There’s an economic slowdown in most of Latin America.  At the moment, there’s going to be, we think, deep interest in how we can work together to facilitate trade so that we can grow jobs as much as possible.

With respect to the Canal, absolutely -- we are looking to the Canal expansion to be completed next year as something as going to be central to our own efforts to increase competitiveness.  The Vice President visited Panama last year, where he witnessed the work that was underway to expand the Canal, and to basically give the Panama Canal the ability to ship loads that are twice the size of the current ability of ships to go through.  It's also connected to our own port expansions and our own efforts to promote infrastructure development in the United States.  So we see this as integral to our own efforts in the United States to promote competitiveness.

MR. RHODES:  Great.  We’ve got time for one more question, operator. 

Q    Two things.  Firstly, should the CARICOM region expect any sort of major announcement or agreement coming from the talks with the CARICOM leaders, especially on the issues of energy and security?  And is this attempt -- is this meeting -- regional meeting with the CARICOM leaders an attempt to show interest in the CARICOM region?  One of the criticisms or one of the threads running through the region has been that the Obama President has not really been interested much in issues of the CARICOM region. 

MR. RHODES:  Sure.  I’ll say a couple things, and Ricardo may want to add to it.  We would anticipate that we have an agenda that will cover security and energy and economic cooperation, and that there will be a number of concrete outcomes within that agenda.  I don’t want to get ahead of the President and the leaders and go into too much detail there.

But before I turn it over to Ricardo, just on your second point, look, we absolutely feel that the CARICOM region does deserve greater attention and engagement from the United States.  That’s why Vice President Biden convened a summit dedicated to energy -- because we, in looking at the region, saw that a number of the CARICOM countries have significant energy needs. 

At the same time, the United States has significant resources not just in terms of our own energy production, but also in our energy infrastructure and our ability to work with countries that have formed cooperative solutions to promote energy security so that our region is more prosperous and less vulnerable to shocks and energy markets. 

But again, more broadly, if you look at the CARICOM countries, there’s enormous familial connections from the Caribbean community into the United States.  There’s significant immigrant populations here in the United States who look back to their either land of their birth or their ancestral homes, and desire closer ties between the United States and the Caribbean.  And there’s a range of shared interests on issues like energy, economic growth, migration, but also disaster problems, climate change, tourism, people-to-people exchanges.

And the fact that the President is doing a town hall in Jamaica dedicated to youth, I think indicates our understanding that there’s enormous youth populations in these countries.  But that carries with it enormous promise, in that if we’re investing in the youth of the Caribbean and partnering with them, we can expand our ties and address the very real dynamic that you point to, which is that at times people feel like the United States has not engaged these countries significantly as we should, given that they’re our close neighbors and, in some cases, they’re our family and they’re our friends.

So I think this is -- we see this as a really important signal to the region about President Obama’s personal commitment to the Caribbean, but also the growing importance of the Caribbean to the United States. 

And the last thing I’ll just say is that CARICOM is also part of the Americas.  And so it's important that we go there on the way to the summit because we also partner with all these countries on the agenda that we’ll be discussing in Panama. 

MR. ZUÑIGA:  Ben really covered it.  I’d only add that as part of that regional agenda we’re going to want to talk about the important of the inter-American system where we know that in the Caribbean in particular there’s a deep reservoir of support for the values that are reflected in the inter-American system and support for our human rights and democracy, and for a system that is inclusive of all the countries in the Americas, not just the ones with the larger populations. 

I'm sure that they’re going to want to talk about developments and relations between the United States and Cuba.  This is an item that is very fortuitous time to be talking about how we see the region as an integrated part of the Americas where all the countries in the region should be taken into account, and where we should be able to work openly with all of those. 

So that, in addition to the issues that Ben pointed out, our familial connections, the importance of immigration reform, as well to the countries of the Caribbean, the importance of our connections and our cultural connections, and our familial connections and our economic connections, and what we can do to promote, again, more successful economies in what I feel is a fairly slow international economic situation. 

So I think with that we will conclude the call. 

MS. MEEHAN:  Thanks, everyone.  That concludes the call.  As a reminder, this call was on the record.  Thanks. 

END
10:06 A.M. EDT    

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President After Roundtable on the Impacts of Climate Change on Public Health

Howard University
Washington, D.C.

3:31 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  I just had the opportunity to have a terrific conversation with our outstanding new Surgeon General, Vivek Murthy, our EPA Administrator, Gina McCarthy, but also some incredible activists from different walks of life in the public health arena.  And the discussion really centered around the fact that climate change is having a impact on our public health.

We’ve got nurses.  We’ve got deans of medical schools.  We have residents and public health officials, primary care physicians and moms, most importantly.  And what we know is that the temperature of the planet is rising.  And we know that in addition to the adverse impacts that may have when it comes to more frequent hurricanes, or more powerful storms, or increased flooding, we also know that it has an impact on public health.

We know that if there are more wildfires, a consequence of rising temperatures, that there are going to be more particulates in the air.  We know that potentially it extends the allergy season, and can induce greater incidents of asthma or more severe incidents of asthma.  We know that, potentially, as temperatures rise, that we’re going to start seeing insect-borne diseases that are not traditional to North America start moving up from the south.

And so there are a whole host of public health impacts that are going to hit home.  And the great thing about this conversation is to see all the work that’s already being done by public health officials, the medical community, nurses and families to start raising awareness around these issues. 

The Pentagon has already said that climate change is a primary national security threat that we’re going to face, and we are working with the Department of Defense to start preparing for that and mitigating for that.  And a lot of our international policy and national security policy is centered around the very real concerns that that’s going to raise.

But we also know that it’s going to have an impact on our public health.  And through the efforts of these individuals and organizations around the country, I think we’re going to be able to start having an impact. 

We’ll just use the example of Charlotte Wallace, a pediatric nurse in Maryland for 18 years -- treated kids with asthma.  And as a nurse and a mom, she understands that climate change is going to be making a difference.  Dr. Bryant-Stephens, who is a primary care physician, has seen firsthand how rising asthma rates, particularly in lower-income communities, can have a terrible impact.

So we’ve got to do better in protecting vulnerable Americans.  Ultimately, though, all of our families are going to be vulnerable.  You can’t cordon yourself off from air or from climate. 

And that’s why, today, we’re making more than 150 data sets on climate change in public health from agencies like the CDC open to the public.  Companies across the country like Google and Microsoft plan to use the data to generate apps and tools that can help communities educate and protect themselves.

We have medical schools, including Howard, and public health schools pledging to train their students in the health impacts of climate change.  And later this week, some of those educators will come to the White House to talk about how they’re incorporating climate change into their teachings, into their curriculum.  And this spring, we’ll have a climate change and health summit at the White House.

So the bottom line is we all need to do our part.  Obviously, this administration has been aggressive in using the administrative authorities that we currently have to increase fuel efficiency standards to make sure that we are taking more carbon out of the emissions from our power plants.  But we’ve got a lot more work to do if we’re going to deal with this problem in an effective way and make sure that our families and our kids are safe.

And one of the key leaders in this is going to be our Surgeon General, Dr. Murthy.  So, Vivek, why don’t you say a few words. 

DR. MURTHY:  Sure.  Well, thank you, Mr. President.  Thank you, Administrator McCarthy.  And my thanks to all of you who joined us here today. 

We had a really enriching conversation today talking about the impact of climate change on public health from a number of different perspectives.  It was very helpful to us.  And I’d like to expand a little on what the President said and speak a little bit more about the relevance of climate change to clinicians and to patients.

We know that climate change means higher temperatures overall, and it also means longer and hotter heat waves.  We also know that higher temperatures can mean worse air in cities, and more smog and more ozone.  We know that more intense wildfires will mean increased smoke in the air.  And we know that earlier springs and longer summers mean longer allergy seasons.

If you put all of this together, this means that we have more people exposed to triggers that can cause asthma attacks, and more asthma attacks mean more days of school missed.  They mean more days of work missed.  They mean more costly trips to the doctor.  And they most importantly mean more scary moments for parents and for children.

This is a personal issue for me because when I was young one of my favorite uncles -- actually he was very dear to me as a child -- he died from a severe asthma attack.  And it’s also personal to me because I’ve cared for many patients over the years who have suffered from asthma and have seen firsthand how frightening it can be to suddenly be wheezing and fighting for every breath.  Asthma can be very difficult for patients, but also for their families.  And the impacts of climate change could make this situation worse.

Additionally, the longer summers and hotter heat waves will also expose more Americans to heat stroke and to heat stress, especially those who work in outdoor settings in industries like farming and construction.  And it means that elderly Americans will be even more vulnerable to respiratory distress and possible death from extreme heat, a problem that we already experience in our cities, particularly among the poor and minority populations who don’t always have easy access to air conditioning.

An underlying principle of public health that I want to emphasize is that of prevention.  Indeed, prevention of disease should be the driving force in our efforts to improve health in America.  And whether it’s promoting heart health through nutrition and physical activity or preventing disease outbreaks through vaccinations, prevention really is our goal, and that is true here with climate change, as well.

As Surgeon General, one of my larger messages to our country is that we all have a stake in health.  And as a result, we all have a responsibility to protect it.  Health isn’t just the responsibility of doctors and nurses and individual patients, it’s a community responsibility.  That means that businesses and faith groups, civic organization, schools and universities like this -- all of American society has a hand in keeping our people healthy and preventing disease not just treating it, and in making sure that every American, no matter who they are or where they’re from has a shot at a healthy life.

So again, we’re very grateful to have had this opportunity to speak with our community leaders here today.  And we’re excited to continue this conversation as we think about how to address some of the challenges that we now see with climate change and public health.

Thank you all very much. 

THE PRESIDENT:  Last point I’ll make, because Vivek touched on this -- when we have, as Dr. Bryant-Stephens mentioned, a child who visits the emergency room six times because of asthma, there’s a cost associated to that.  We as a society pay for that.  And even if the child has insurance, it is still resources that are being devoted to treating a child that could have avoided an emergency room visit if we took better care of the environment in which they were growing up.

And the reason I think this is important is because sometimes you’ll hear the debate when it comes to climate change that this is going to be too costly to address.  Well, the fact of the matter is we know that the costs of clean energy have rapidly come down and are increasingly competitive; that when -- historically, we have dealt with problems like smog or acid rain or the ozone, it’s turned out that things are cheaper to fix than we anticipated, and -- who’s calling there, Ms. Miller?

MS. MILLER:  My husband.

THE PRESIDENT:  Tell your husband I’m in the middle of a press conference.  (Laughter.)  I’m teasing. 

So what has turned out typically is, is that the costs have been lower than anticipated.  The benefits have been extraordinary.  Hard to put a price on, in some cases, and in some cases, we can be very clear about how much it costs.  And when it comes to public health issues, when we’re doing effective work on prevention, and we are preventing tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of asthma incidents, or we are preventing thousands of deaths as a consequence of asthma, that is something that we know is not only preventable when it comes to the individual, but it’s something where we could be saving money as a society as a whole.

And so I want everybody to start recognizing the costs of inaction, and recognize that the costs of inaction are even higher than the costs of action.  In the same way that there are costs associated when you have severe drought or significant wildfires or the kinds of storm surges that we saw in Hurricane Sandy, well, there are public health costs, as well.  And we’re ultimately going to be better off being proactive getting out in front of this thing as opposed to reactive where we pay a whole lot more in pain and suffering as well as in terms of trying to deal with the back end of the problem.

Thank you, everybody. 

END
3:42 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by the Press Secretary on Bipartisan Efforts to Replace the No Child Left Behind Act

Today’s announcement from Senator Alexander and Senator Murray is an important step in their bipartisan effort to replace the No Child Left Behind Act. As Congress continues its work, President Obama will continue to insist on providing our schools with greater flexibility to invest in what works, making sure that teachers aren’t confined to teaching to the test, putting resources behind innovation in our education system, and expanding opportunities for America’s children to attend high-quality preschool. We believe that any bill should ensure that teachers and parents know how their schools are doing every year, reject harmful proposals that would let states take away funding from schools that need it most, and make sure we remain committed to closing troubling achievement and opportunity gaps in America’s schools and driving progress in those that are the lowest-performing.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, President Barack Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to key Administration posts:

  • Gabriel Camarillo – Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Manpower and Reserve Affairs, Department of Defense
  • William A. Heidt – Ambassador to the Kingdom of Cambodia, Department of State
  • David Malcolm Robinson – Assistant Secretary for Conflict and Stabilization Operations and Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization, Department of State
  • Joyce Connery – Member, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, and upon appointment to be designated Chair

President Obama also announced his intent to appoint the following individual to a key Administration post:

  • Kevin Griffis – Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Department of Health and Human Services

President Obama said, “These fine public servants bring a depth of experience and tremendous dedication to their important roles. I look forward to working with them.”

President Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to key Administration posts:

Gabriel Camarillo, Nominee for Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Manpower and Reserve Affairs, Department of Defense
Gabriel Camarillo is the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisitions, Logistics & Technology (AL&T), a position he has held since 2012. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Camarillo served as Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary of the Army for AL&T. Since 2011, Mr. Camarillo has been an Adjunct Professor at Georgetown University’s McCourt School of Public Policy. During the 2008 presidential election, Mr. Camarillo was the Deputy Voter Protection Coordinator in New Mexico for Obama for America. From 2004 to 2010, he practiced campaign finance and government ethics law in California. Mr. Camarillo began his legal career as an Associate at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. Mr. Camarillo received a B.A. from Georgetown University and a J.D. from Stanford Law School.

William A. Heidt, Nominee for Ambassador to the Kingdom of Cambodia, Department of State
William A. Heidt, a career member of the Foreign Service, class of Minister-Counselor, currently serves as Executive Assistant to the Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment at the Department of State, a position he has held since 2012. Mr. Heidt served as Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Warsaw, Poland from 2009 to 2012, Counselor for Economic and Social Affairs at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations in New York from 2007 to 2009, Economic Counselor at the U.S. Embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia from 2004 to 2007, and Special Assistant in the Office of the Under Secretary for Economic, Business, and Agricultural Affairs from 2003 to 2004. Prior to that, he served as a Finance and Development Officer at the U.S. Embassy in Jakarta from 2000 to 2003 and Economic and Commercial Officer at the U.S. Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia from 1997 to 1999. Earlier assignments with the Department included Economic Officer in the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs, Economic Officer in the Office of Korean Affairs, Economic Officer in the Office of Bilateral Trade Affairs, and Consular Officer at the U.S. Consulate in Poznan, Poland. Mr. Heidt received a B.A from Pennsylvania State University and an M.A. from The George Washington University.

Ambassador David Malcolm Robinson, Nominee for Assistant Secretary for Conflict and Stabilization Operations and Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization, Department of State
Ambassador David Malcolm Robinson, a career member of the Foreign Service, class of Minister-Counselor, currently serves as Principal Deputy High Representative of the International Community in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a position he has held since 2014. Previously, Ambassador Robinson was Assistant Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan from 2013 to 2014, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and Deputy Assistant Secretary of State in the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration from 2009 to 2013, and Special Coordinator for Venezuela in the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs from 2008 to 2009. Ambassador Robinson served as U.S. Ambassador to Guyana from 2006 to 2008 and as Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Georgetown, Guyana from 2003 to 2006. He also served as Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Asuncion, Paraguay from 2000 to 2003. His earlier assignments included posts in El Salvador, the Dominican Republic, and Iceland. Ambassador Robinson received a B.A. from the University of Notre Dame, an M.S. from the National War College, and a Master of Divinity from Christ the King Seminary.

Joyce Connery, Nominee for Member, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, and upon appointment to be designated Chair
Joyce Connery serves as Director of Nuclear Energy Policy within the Office of International Economics on the National Security Council (NSC) in the White House, a position she has held since 2012. Prior to this, she served as the Senior Policy Advisor to the Deputy Secretary at the Department of Energy (DOEn) from 2010 to 2012. From 2009 to 2010, Ms. Connery served as the Director of Cooperative Threat Reduction and Nuclear Energy Cooperation and in 2008 served as Director of Nonproliferation Policy at the NSC. From 2006 to 2008, Ms. Connery served as Senior Policy Advisor to the Deputy Administrator for Defense Nuclear Proliferation at the DOEn. Before that position, she was a Policy Advisor to the Assistant Deputy Administrator at DOEn from 2004 to 2006. From 1999 to 2004, Ms. Connery served in various positions at Argonne National Laboratory for the DOEn including Program Analyst and Foreign Affairs Specialist from 2001 to 2004, Technical Program Coordinator from 2000 to 2001, and Nuclear Nonproliferation Program Representative from 1999 to 2000. Ms. Connery received a B.A. and M.A. from Tufts University.

President Obama announced his intent to appoint the following individual to a key Administration post:

Kevin Griffis, Appointee for Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Department of Health and Human Services
Kevin Griffis serves as a Senior Advisor in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), a position he has held since May 2014. Since December 2014, he has also served as the Acting Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at HHS. Prior to this, Mr. Griffis served as Communications Director for Senator Cory Booker from 2013 to 2014 and as Senior Advisor and Communications Director for Cory Booker’s Senate campaign in 2013. From 2012 to 2013, he was a Principal at the Podesta Group. Mr. Griffis served as Senior Advisor in the Office of Public Affairs at the Department of Commerce (DOC) in 2012. From 2009 to 2012, he was Director of Public Affairs at DOC. Prior to this, Mr. Griffis was Spokesman for the Presidential Inaugural Committee in 2009, and a State Communications Director for Obama for America from 2007 to 2008. He was Communications Director for the Pedersen for U.S. Senate campaign in 2006. In 2005, Mr. Griffis was Communications Director for Virginia Victory 2005, and from 2005 to 2006, he was Communications Director at the Democratic Party of Virginia. Mr. Griffis was Communications Director at America Coming Together-Nevada and was Press Secretary for Cliff Oxford for U.S. Senate in 2004. From 2000 to 2004, he was Staff Writer at Creative Loafing, a newspaper in Atlanta. Mr. Griffis began his career as a Staff Writer at the Carroll County Times, a position he held from 1998 to 2000. He received a B.A. from Beloit College.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama Announces a Key Administration Post

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, President Barack Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individual to a key Administration post:

  • Bruce Hamilton – Member, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

President Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individual to a key Administration post:

Bruce Hamilton, Nominee for Member, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

Bruce Hamilton serves as a consultant to the nuclear industry, a role he has held since 2013.  Prior to this, he was the President of Fuelco LLC from 2009 to 2013.  From 2003 to 2008, Mr. Hamilton was the Director of Luminant Power at Comanche Peak NPP.  From 1978 to 2002, he served as a Captain in the U.S. Navy.  Mr. Hamilton serves on a variety of boards, including as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Military Officers Association of America and as a Member of the American Nuclear Society. Mr. Hamilton received a B.S. from Texas A&M University, an M.A. from the Naval Postgraduate School, and a Ph.D. from The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.  

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President and the Vice President at Easter Prayer Breakfast

East Room

9:30 A.M. EDT

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the White House.  Religious leaders, lay faithful, it's an honor -- it's an honor to join you in a morning of prayer and reflection, and it's a delight to have many of you back.

For me, reflection is what Holy Week is all about.  And I never fail to get a renewed sense of hope and possibilities when I attend Mass on Easter Sunday. 

I believe Pope Francis got it right in his Easter Vigil homily when he said, “We cannot live Easter without entering into mystery.  To enter into mystery means the ability to wonder, to contemplate, the ability to listen to the silence and hear the tiny whisper amid the great silence by which God speaks to us.”

I think that's who we are as Christians, and quite frankly, I think that's who we are as Americans.  We're constantly renewed as a people and as individuals by our ability to enter into the mystery.  We live our faith when we instill in our children the ability to wonder, to contemplate, and to listen to that tiny whisper amid the great silence.  We live our faith when we nurture the hope and possibilities that have always defined us as a country.  We live Easter -- and to live Easter is to live with the constant notion that we can always do better.  We can always do better.

That's why I'm so grateful for what everyone in this room does to transform hope into possibilities, and possibilities into opportunity.  And that's why I've been so honored to work every single day for the last six-plus years with a man who encompasses that faith to his core.  A man who knows what it is to enter into the mystery with a deep and unyielding conviction that it's within each of our reach to make real the promise of the ongoing miracle that is the United States of America.

Ladies and gentlemen, it is my great honor to introduce you to my friend, the President of the United States of America, Barack Obama.  (Applause.) 

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you, everybody.  Thank you so much.  (Applause.)  Everybody, have a seat.  Thank you.  Well, we give thanks for this day that the Lord has made.  Good morning, everybody.

AUDIENCE:  Good morning.

THE PRESIDENT:  Welcome to the White House.  It is wonderful to see so many friends from all across the country.  My first concern was whether you actually got something to eat.  (Laughter.)  Sometimes prayer breakfasts are advertised -- (laughter) -- and then you get there and there’s like a little muffin.  (Laughter.)  A couple of berries.  (Laughter.)  And though your soul may be nourished, you leave hungry.  So I hope that is not happening here. 

I want to thank everybody here for their prayers, which mean so much to me and Michelle.  Particularly at a time when my daughters are starting to grow up and starting to go on college visits, I need prayer.  (Laughter.)  I start tearing up in the middle of the day and I can't explain it.  (Laughter.)  Why am I so sad?  (Laughter.)  They’re leaving me.

And I want to thank everybody here for the wonderful work that you do all across the country with your remarkable ministries. 

We hold this Easter Prayer Breakfast every year to take a moment from our hectic lives for some fellowship, friendship, prayer and reflection.  I know pastors here have had a very busy Holy Week, and so for you to travel here and take the time to spend with us is extraordinary after what I know is difficult.  I can't say that our work during this season is comparable, but you should try dealing with thousands of people in your backyard on an Easter egg roll.  (Laughter.)  After that you need quiet reflection -- particularly because I had some of my nephews -- 6 and 4 -- in my house all weekend.  And you need quiet reflection after that.  (Laughter.)  Girls are different than boys.   

This morning, we also remember a man of God who we lost this weekend, a man known and loved by many of you -- the dean of American preaching, Dr. Gardner C. Taylor.  Anybody who had the privilege of hearing him speak knows what power he had.  He was a civil rights hero.  He was a friend of Dr. King, who used his spellbinding sermons to spread the Gospel and open people’s hearts and minds.  He taught and mentored countless young ministers.  So as we mourn his absence today, we also take solace knowing that he leaves a living legacy and that he is in a better place.

I am no preacher.  I can’t tell anything to this crowd about Easter that you don’t already know.  I can offer just a couple of reflections very quickly before we begin the program.

For me, the celebration of Easter puts our earthly concerns into perspective.  With humility and with awe, we give thanks to the extraordinary sacrifice of Jesus Christ, our Savior.  We reflect on the brutal pain that He suffered, the scorn that He absorbed, the sins that He bore, this extraordinary gift of salvation that He gave to us.  And we try, as best we can, to comprehend the darkness that He endured so that we might receive God’s light.

And yet, even as we grapple with the sheer enormity of Jesus’s sacrifice, on Easter we can't lose sight of the fact that the story didn’t end on Friday.  The story keeps on going.  On Sunday comes the glorious Resurrection of our Savior. 

“Good Friday may occupy the throne for a day,” Dr. King once preached, “but ultimately it must give way to the triumphant beat of the drums of Easter.”  Drums that beat the rhythm of renewal and redemption, goodness and grace, hope and love.  Easter is our affirmation that there are better days ahead -- and also a reminder that it is on us, the living, to make them so. 

Through God’s mercy, Peter the Apostle said, we are given “an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you.”  It’s an inheritance that calls on us to be better, to love more deeply, to serve “the least of these” as an expression of Christ’s love here on Earth.

That’s the spirit we feel in the example of His Holiness, Pope Francis, who encourages us to seek peace, to serve the marginalized, and be good stewards of God’s creation.  Like millions of Americans, I’m honored that we will be welcoming him to our country later this year. 

I want to quote him.  He says that we should strive “to see the Lord in every excluded person who is thirsty, hungry, naked; to see the Lord present even in those who have lost their faith… imprisoned, sick, unemployed, persecuted; to see the Lord in the leper -- whether in body or soul -- who encounters discrimination.”
  
Isn’t that how Jesus lived?  Isn't that how He loved?  Embracing those who were different; serving the marginalized; humbling Himself to the last.  This is the example that we are called to follow -- to love Him with all our hearts and mind and soul, and to love our neighbors -- all of our neighbors -- as ourselves.  As it says in the first letter of John, “Let us not love with words or speech but with actions and in truth.”

On Easter, I do reflect on the fact that as a Christian, I am supposed to love.  And I have to say that sometimes when I listen to less than loving expressions by Christians, I get concerned.  But that's a topic for another day.  (Laughter and applause.) 

Where there is injustice -- I was about to veer off.  (Laughter.)  I'm pulling it back.  Where there is injustice we defend the oppressed.  Where there is disagreement, we treat each other with compassion and respect.  Where there are differences, we find strength in our common humanity, knowing that we are all children of God.  

So today, we celebrate the magnificent glory of our risen Savior.  I pray that we will live up to His example.  I pray that I will live up to His example.  I fall short so often.  Every day I try to do better.  I pray that we will be strengthened by His eternal love.  I pray that we will be worthy of His many blessings. 

With that, I’d like to invite Reverend Dr. Amy Butler to offer our opening prayer.

END
9:43 A.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by the President on the 21st Anniversary of the Genocide in Rwanda

Twenty-one years ago today, a genocide began that would claim the lives of more than 800,000 Rwandan men, women, and children and mark the beginning of one hundred days of horror for Rwanda’s people.  Today is a day to commemorate those who lost their lives, to honor the courage of those who risked their lives to save others, and to grieve with the Rwandan people.  It is also a day to reaffirm what our common humanity demands—that we stand together to prevent mass atrocities and continue to do all we can to make good on the pledge of “never again.”  We also renew our commitment to help finish the task of bringing to justice those who inflicted such tragedy upon such a beautiful land.     

While we remain haunted by the genocide, we also draw hope and inspiration from the people of Rwanda, who are building a brighter future.  We commend their determination to continue to make important progress toward healing old wounds and lifting people out of poverty.  The United States will continue to work tirelessly in partnership with Rwanda and with other nations to help prevent such atrocities and advance dignity and peace for all.

White House Easter Egg Roll Highlights 2015

April 06, 2015 | 1:37 | Public Domain

Check out the best of the 2015 White House Easter Egg Roll held on the South Lawn of the White House.

Download mp4 (54MB)

This Day in History: The White House Easter Egg Roll Wrap-Up

This Day
jul
4
In History

Today, President Obama and the First Lady welcomed more than 35,000 guests to the White House South Lawn for the 137th annual White House Easter Egg Roll. The day's activities included live music performances, "egg"-tivity centers, cooking stations, storytelling, and, of course, Easter egg rolling.

To celebrate the fifth anniversary of the First Lady’s Let’s Move! initiative, this year’s Easter Egg Roll theme is #GimmeFive – and Mrs. Obama is challenging Americans across the country to share five things they’re doing to eat better, stay active, and lead a healthier life. 

Whether real or wooden eggs are used, the White House Easter Egg Roll has remained a day full of festive spirit since 1878. Today, in 2015, the 137th annual event celebrates the "eggceptional" commitment the President has to America’s future generation.

Miranda Houchins is an intern in the White House Office of Digital Strategy.
Related Topics: Grab Bag, Georgia