West Wing Week: 09/21/12 or "The Dignity and Freedom That Every Person Deserves"

This week, the President, Vice President and Secretary of State attended the Transfer of Remains Ceremony for the four Americans killed in Libya, while the White House welcomed Olympians and Paralympians, WNBA champions the Minnesota Lynx, new foreign Ambassadors, and the Children's Miracle Network. That's September 14th to September 20th or "The Dignity and Freedom That Every Person Deserves."

Watch the West Wing Week here.

Friday, September 14th:

  • The President, Vice President, and First Lady welcomed the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic teams to The White House.
  • The White House hosted a "Safety Datapalooza," which highlighted innovators from the private, nonprofit and academic sectors who have utilized freely available government data to build products, services, and apps that advance public safety in creative and powerful ways.
  • Friday Afternoon, President Obama, Vice President Biden and Secretary Clinton attended a Transfer of Remains Ceremony at Andrews Air Force Base which marked the return to the United States of the remains of the four brave Americans who were killed this week in Benghazi, Libya.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event -- Tampa, FL

Private Residence
Tampa, Florida

6:16 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, everybody!  (Applause.)  It is so good to see all of you, and I'm going to have a chance to, I know, take some pictures and spend a little time with you. 

But let me begin by thanking Eddie Vedder for that unbelievable performance -- (applause) -- but more importantly, for that story, which is the first time I've ever heard that story.  And for you to share that with us, Eddie, I think speaks volumes not just about you and who you are, but it also speaks volumes about our country, because that story I think captures better than anything what this campaign is about and what this country is about.  At any given moment, all of us may have challenges.  At any given moment, all of us may need a helping hand.  And that's not inconsistent with individual initiative and risk-taking and pursuing the American Dream.  It's part and parcel of it.

And so I'm so grateful for your friendship and your support, but I'm really grateful for you sharing that story with all of us.  Thank you.  (Applause.)

To Lisa and Don, thank you for opening up your extraordinary home.  (Applause.)  We are so grateful. 

I want to thank Tyler Florence for all the outstanding food. (Applause.)  And I want to acknowledge your former governor, a great friend -- and I can admit it now -- Charlie Crist.  (Applause.)  I'm allowed to hug him as much as I want.  (Laughter.) 

We are less than 50 days away from the election.  And this is my last election, so I get nostalgic sometimes thinking about all my previous races.  And my first race where Michelle and I would go door to door with these Xeroxed -- we'd gone to Kinko's and we had kind of printed up these little hand cards.  And people would look and say, what name is this?  (Laughter.)  And they couldn't pronounce it, and people wouldn't answer the door. And the campaign was run out of our kitchen in a small condo in Chicago. 

And obviously now, things have changed.  Our budget is a little bit bigger.  Our mode of transport, as opposed to me driving around with one staff person in the passenger seat, and unfolding maps and trying to figure out where I'm supposed to go, and trying to find a parking spot, and getting there and it turns out it's raining and I don't have an umbrella and so I walk into people's houses soaked -- things are a little smoother for me now, I've got to admit.  (Laughter.) 

But the motivation, the reason that I'm running now is no different from that first race, and it's no different than the sentiment that Eddie just expressed up here on stage.  Because, like him, I've traveled a long way, but it's been an unlikely journey, and the reason that I'm here is because this country, alone among any other country on Earth, is able to pluck the son of a single mom, without fame, without fortune, without resources, without connections, and give him the kind of education and doors of opportunity that allowed me, as long as I was willing to work hard and make some sacrifices, to make something of myself.  And the same is true for Michelle.  And the same is true for a number of you.

And so what’s at stake, when I think about this election, is preserving or restoring that basic bargain here in America that says if you work hard, if you meet your responsibilities and if you’ve got some big dreams, you’ve got a chance to succeed.  You may not succeed and become a rock and roll star.  (Laughter.)  But you’ve got a chance to have a home, and raise a family, and not go bankrupt when you get sick, and contribute to your community, and most importantly, give your kids an even better chance to do better and dream bigger than you did. 

And for a decade or so, it felt as if that dream was slipping away.  We had seen jobs shipped overseas so that the traditional path for a lot of folks into the middle class through manufacturing jobs -- that was gone.  You saw incomes flat-line or go down and the costs of everything from health care to college going up, people having to take on more and more debt just to keep up, and then eventually the house of cards collapsing in the worst recession since the Great Depression.

And I ran for President because that’s not the story I tell myself about who we are as a nation.  I still believe in that story that Eddie described, and that my own life exemplifies.  And so for the last three and a half years, everything we’ve done has been focused on how do we grow this economy so that everybody has got a fair shot and everybody is doing their fair share and everybody is playing by the same rules, and we’re growing a strong middle class, not from the top down but from the middle out and from the bottom up. 

And it’s because of the resilience of the American people and the policies that we’ve put in place that we’ve been able to turn around a situation where we were losing 800,000 jobs a month, and now have seen 30 consecutive months of job growth.  It’s for that reason.  (Applause.) 

It’s for that reason that we’ve been able to provide millions of students greater assistance for them to go to college -- not just four-year colleges, but also community colleges so that they can get trained for the jobs that are hiring right now.

It’s for that reason that we said it’s time for us to do something about health care in this country.  When we’ve got tens of millions of people who are at risk of going bankrupt just because somebody in their family gets sick, that’s something we can change.

It’s for that reason that we passed Wall Street reform, so that not only do we no longer see taxpayer-funded bailouts, but we also start seeing consumers protected from unscrupulous mortgage brokers or payday lenders, and people have a sense that they’re not going to be cheated when they go into the marketplace. 

It’s for that reason that we’ve been able to double our fuel-efficiency standards on cars, and cut our imports of oil and begin to double our clean energy.

All these things are of a piece, because all these things are designed to try to make our economy strong and create a foundation so that, once again, anybody who works hard can make it here in this country.

Now, we’ve got a lot more work to do, and everybody here knows it, and certainly folks here in Florida understand that.  We’ve got a lot of people who are still looking for work, a lot of people whose homes are still underwater.  We’ve got communities that are struggling and storefronts that are still boarded up.  And that’s why this election becomes so important -- not only is our work not done, but we’ve got as fundamental a choice as I’ve seen since I’ve been following politics between two different candidates, two different parties, but also, most importantly, two different visions of how we move forward.

Governor Romney and his allies in Congress think that the solution, the way we provide strong growth and opportunity, is to provide tax cuts for folks like you.  (Laughter.)  And, listen, I understand nobody likes paying taxes, but that recipe we tried.  We tried it for a decade -- and it worked very well for us, but it didn’t work well for the country.  The other big idea that they’ve got is to roll back regulations that keep our air and water clean; roll back regulations that make sure that people aren’t abused in the marketplace.  We tried that, too, and it didn’t work very well.

So we’ve got a different idea, and what I tried to do at the convention -- I know there was one here; we had another one in Charlotte.  Maybe you saw both of them.  (Applause.)  What we’ve said is, let’s focus on how we continue to build an economy that works for middle-class families and everybody who’s striving to get into that middle class; how do we make sure we’re providing tax breaks to companies that are investing here in Florida, here in the United States, instead of giving tax breaks to companies that are shipping jobs overseas; how do we make sure that every educational opportunity works for everybody, that college is accessible, that we’re hiring outstanding teachers in math and science, that we’re investing in early childhood education. 

How do we make sure that we’re developing oil and gas resources, but we’re also investing in clean energy like wind and solar that can cut our carbon, reduce our dependence on foreign oil and is good for people’s pocketbooks; and how do we reduce our deficit in a balanced way, cutting out programs that don’t work.  And for those of you who are Democrats, I have to confess that not every program works in Washington, and we can trim back and streamline and make government more efficient -- in fact, we have an obligation to -- but even after we make those cuts, if we’re serious about deficit reduction we’re then also going to have to ask folks who've done very well to do a little bit more, and go back to the rates we had when Bill Clinton was President  -- which is a time, by the way, when we created 23 million new jobs, a surplus instead of a deficit, and actually created a whole lot of millionaires to boot.  (Applause.)  

Because it turns out that when you’ve got middle-class families doing well, guess what -- they spend money.  They buy cars and computers and -- I was going to say CDs, but I’m dating myself -- (laughter.)  And then businesses have more profits and they hire more people, and we get into a virtuous cycle and everybody does better.

Now, at the same time as we’re focused domestically, we’ve got some stuff internationally, obviously, that’s going on.  And this past week reminded us of the challenges and the threats that are still out there.  I said I’d end the war in Iraq -- and we did. (Applause.)  I said we would begin winding down our commitments in Afghanistan and make sure that Afghans are taking responsibility for their own security -- and that process has begun.  I said we’d go after al Qaeda and bin Laden -- and we did that.  (Applause.) 

But we’re not done yet.  We’re still threatened by an Iran that is pursuing nuclear weapons and I’ve been absolutely clear that our policy is not to allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon.  We can’t afford a nuclear arms race in the region.  Obviously, there are still extremists around the world who threaten us, which is why my commitment is to continue to have the strongest military in the world.  But I also want to lead with diplomacy.  I also want to lead with our values and our ideals.

And I also want to make sure that we understand that if we’re going to be strong abroad, we’ve got to do some nation-building here at home -- and so take half of the money that we were spending on war to pay down the deficit, and use a whole bunch of it to rebuild America, putting people back to work with roads and bridges and schools and infrastructure.  All that can help us grow and, ultimately, will help to finance what we need to keep us safe. 

So we’ve got a lot of work to do.  And the main point I guess I want to make to you is that, this being my last campaign, I'm not going to be leaving a lot on the field.  And I know we've got a football family here -- I see an outstanding all-star -- all-pro in the audience -- and when you've got your last game you've got to leave it all out there.  And when the stakes are this high, we've got to work.  We have to work.

If you believe in the course that we've put out there, if you believe that it was the right thing to end "don't ask, don't tell," (applause) -- if you believe that it's the right thing to make sure that young people who are brought here and have gone to school here and pledge allegiance to the flag and understand themselves as Americans but just don’t have the papers, that it makes no sense for us to send them to countries that they don’t even know anything about -- (applause) -- if you believe that we have to have an economy that works for everybody and not just some, then I'm going to need you to work. 

And some of you have been watching television and you know that the other side is not short on funds, they are not short on resources.  I was -- my campaign manager was with a couple with a young son and they were very excited to meet the campaign manager of the Obama campaign, and they said their three-year-old knows Obama, and they said, "What does President Obama do?"  And the three-year-old says, "He approves this message."  (Laughter.)  Which is a sign that things have gotten a little carried away.

But for the next little less than two months, we're going to see more advertising, more negative messages than we've ever seen before.  And the only way we counteract that is through the determination and passion of folks like you. 

I'm confident we can win this thing, but it's not a sure thing.  And I'm going to need all of you to stretch a little bit. To the extent that I'm preaching to the choir, I need you guys to go out and do some evangelizing yourselves.  Get your friends, neighbors, co-workers.  It may not always be easy, but what's more important? 

I had a chance to see Lisa and Don's young sons.  Many of you have children.  I think about Malia and Sasha.  I want them to live in a country where they believe that if they're willing to put in the effort, they can be a platinum-selling artist, or a President of the United States, or an outstanding businessman or woman.  I don’t want their dreams constricted.  And I also don’t want our kids to think that somehow success is reserved for them, and that somehow half the country is locked out of that success.

I want everybody to be successful -- black, white, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, abled or disabled.  I want everybody to have a chance to succeed.  That’s what we're fighting for in this election.  That’s why I need you guys stepping up. 

If you do, not only will we win Florida, we'll win in November.  We'll finish what we started, and remind the world just what it is that makes America the greatest nation on Earth. 

Thank you everybody.  I'll see you inside.  God bless you.

END
6:31 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Presidential Proclamation -- National POW/MIA Recognition Day, 2012

NATIONAL POW/MIA RECOGNITION DAY, 2012

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

A PROCLAMATION

For more than two centuries, Americans have bravely served our Nation as members of our Armed Forces.  Many have made profound sacrifices to uphold the ideals we cherish, carrying wounds that may never fully heal and dark memories that will never fade.  Today, we pay solemn tribute to service members who bore war's tragic costs as prisoners of war and those missing in action.  We stand with the families who have known the lingering ache of a loved one's uncertain fate.  And as a Nation, we reaffirm a most sacred obligation:  that we must never forget the men and women who did not come home, and that we must never stop trying to return them to their families and the country they fought to protect.

As long as members of our Armed Forces remain unaccounted for, America will bring our fullest resources to bear in finding them and bringing them home.  It is a promise we make not only to the families of our captured and our missing, but to all who have worn the uniform.  Our Nation continues to recover the remains of fallen heroes we lost in the Vietnam War, the Korean War, World War II, and other conflicts.  And as these patriots are finally laid to rest, we pray their return brings closure and a measure of peace to those who knew and loved them.  During this day of recognition, let us honor their sacrifice once more by expressing our deepest gratitude to our service members, our veterans, our military families, and all those who have given so much to keep our country safe.

On September 21, 2012, the stark black and white banner symbolizing America's Missing in Action and Prisoners of War will be flown over the White House; the United States Capitol; the Departments of State, Defense, and Veterans Affairs; the Selective Service System Headquarters; the World War II Memorial; the Korean War Veterans Memorial; the Vietnam Veterans Memorial; United States post offices; national cemeteries; and other locations across our country.  We raise this flag as a solemn reminder of our obligation to always remember the sacrifices made to defend our Nation.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 21, 2012, as National POW/MIA Recognition Day.  I urge all Americans to observe this day of honor and remembrance with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-seventh.

BARACK OBAMA

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by the President at Univision Town Hall with Jorge Ramos and Maria Elena Salinas

University of Miami
Miami, Florida

2:15 P.M. EDT
 
Q Please welcome the President of the United States. (Applause.)
 
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.
 
Q Welcome. Thank you for being here with us.
 
THE PRESIDENT: Muchas gracias.
 
Q Before we start, before talking about education and its future, we would like to talk about something that is happening right now in recent news. As we know, at the present time, 1,000 people are trying to get into the embassy in Pakistan, and we have seen protests, anti-American protests in thousands of countries.
 
We know in Libya, four Americans were killed. We know now that Ambassador Chris Stevens warned about security days before he was killed. Many people want to know whether -- if you expected so much anti-American sentiment in the Islamic world. And why wasn't your administration better prepared with more security at our embassies on September 11?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, obviously we mourn the loss of the Americans who were killed in Benghazi. But I think it's important to understand that that’s not representative of the attitudes of the Libyan people towards America, because they understand because of the incredible work that our diplomats did as well as our men and women in uniform, we liberated that country from a dictator who had terrorized them for 40 years. And Chris Stevens, the ambassador there, was one of the leaders of that process. So when he was killed, there were vigils in Libya but also in front of the White House expressing the deep sorrow that the Libyan people felt towards them.
 
What we've seen over the last week, week and a half, is something that actually we've seen in the past, where there is an offensive video or cartoon directed at the prophet Muhammad. And this is obviously something that then is used as an excuse by some to carry out inexcusable violent acts directed at Westerners or Americans.
 
And my number-one priority is always to keep our diplomats safe and to keep our embassies safe. And so when the initial events happened in Cairo and all across the region, we worked with Secretary Clinton to redouble our security and to send a message to the leaders of these countries, essentially saying, although we had nothing to do with the video, we find it offensive, it's not representative of America's views, how we treat each other with respect when it comes to their religious beliefs, but we will not tolerate violence.
 
And our goal now is not only to make sure that our embassies and our diplomats are safe, but also to make sure that we bring those who carried out these events to justice.
 
There is a larger issue, and that is what's going to be happening in the Arab Spring as these countries transition from dictatorship to democracy. And we cannot replace the tyranny of a dictator with the tyranny of a mob. And so my message to the Presidents of Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and these other countries is, we want to be a partner with you, we will work with you, and we stand on the side of democracy, but democracy is not just an election; it's also, are you looking out for minority rights, are you respecting freedom of speech, are you treating women fairly.
 
All these issues are ones that the region is going to wrestle with. The one thing we can't do is withdraw from the region, because the United States continues to be the one indispensable nation. And even countries where the United States is criticized, they still want our leadership and they still look to us to make sure that we're providing opportunity and peace. And so we're going to continue to work in these regions.
 
Q We have reports that the White House said today that the attacks in Libya were a terrorist attack. Do you have information indicating that it was Iran, or al Qaeda was behind organizing the protests?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, we're still doing an investigation, and there are going to be different circumstances in different countries. And so I don’t want to speak to something until we have all the information. What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests --
 
Q Al Qaeda?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, we don’t know yet. And so we're going to continue to investigate this. We've insisted on and have received so far full cooperation from countries like Egypt and Libya and Tunisia in not only protecting our diplomatic posts, but also to make sure that we discover who, in fact, is trying to take advantage of this.
 
But this is part of the reason why we have to remain vigilant. Look, when I came into office I said I would end the war in Iraq -- and I did. I said that we would begin transitioning in Afghanistan so that over time Afghans can take responsibility for their own security. But what I also said was we’re going to have to focus narrowly and forcefully on groups like al Qaeda, the ones that carried out the 9/11 attacks and the ones that still threaten U.S. interests.
 
And those forces have not gone away. We’ve decimated al Qaeda’s top leadership in the border regions around Pakistan, but in Yemen, in Libya, in other of these places -- increasingly in places like Syria -- what you see is these elements that don’t have the same capacity that a bin Laden or core al Qaeda had, but can still cause a lot of damage, and we’ve got to make sure that we remain vigilant and are focused on preventing them from doing us any harm.
 
Q Mr. President, I want to ask you something that is known as the “Obama promise,” and you knew that I was going to ask you about that. On May 28th, 2008, we had a conversation in Denver, Colorado, and you told me the following -- and I’m going to quote you: "But I can guarantee that we will have, in the first year, an immigration bill that I strongly support."
 
I want to emphasize "the first year." At the beginning of your governing, you had control of both chambers of Congress, and yet you did not introduce immigration reform. And before I continue, I want for you to acknowledge that you did not keep your promise.
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, let me first of all, Jorge, make a point that when we talked about immigration reform in the first year, that’s before the economy was on the verge of collapse -- Lehman Brothers had collapsed, the stock market was collapsing. And so my first priority was making sure that we prevented us from going into a Great Depression.
 
And I think everybody here remembers where we were four years ago. We lost 800,000 jobs the month that I took office. Small businesses and big businesses couldn’t get financing. People had seen their 401(k)s evaporate. People were losing homes left and right.
 
And so we had to take a whole series of emergency actions to make sure that we put people back to work, cutting taxes for middle-class families and small businesses so that they could stay open or pay the bills, making sure that states got assistance so they didn’t have to lay off teachers and firefighters and police officers, saving an auto industry that was on the brink of collapse.
 
And so that took up a huge amount of time in the first year. But even in that first year, one of my first acts was to invite every single member of Congress who had previously been supportive of comprehensive immigration reform, and to say to them, we need to get this done. This is something I believe in deeply because we are a nation of laws and we’re a nation of immigrants. And I am willing to work with anybody to strengthen our border security and to crack down on employers who are taking advantage of undocumented workers, but what we also have to do is provide a pathway for all those millions of hardworking people who are simply here looking after their families, and oftentimes they’ve put deep roots in this country.
 
And what I confess I did not expect -- and so I’m happy to take responsibility for being naive here -- is that Republicans who had previously supported comprehensive immigration reform -- my opponent in 2008, who had been a champion of it and who attended these meetings -- suddenly would walk away. That’s what I did not anticipate.
 
And as you know, Jorge, even though we controlled the House of Representatives, even though we had a majority in the Senate, the way the Senate operates was if you couldn’t get 60 votes you couldn’t get something moving. So we initiated the meetings, had a series of meetings. And what we could not get was a single Republican, including the 20 who had previously voted for comprehensive immigration reform, to step up and say, we will work with you to make this happen.
 
Q It was a promise, Mr. President. And I don't want to -- because this is very important, I don’t want to get you off the explanation. You promised that. And a promise is a promise. And with all due respect, you didn’t keep that promise.
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, here is what I would say, Jorge, is that -- and we’ve had this conversation before. There’s the thinking that the President is somebody who is all powerful and can get everything done. In our branch of -- in our system of government, I am the head of the executive branch. I’m not the head of the legislature; I’m not the head of the judiciary. We have to have cooperation from all these sources in order to get something done. And so I am happy to take responsibility for the fact that we didn’t get it done, but I did not make a promise that I would get everything done, 100 percent, when I was elected as President.
 
What I promised was that I would work every single day as hard as I can to make sure that everybody in this country, regardless of who they are, what they look like, where they come from, that they would have a fair shot at the American Dream. And I have -- that promise I’ve kept.
 
And what I’ve also -- I think is relevant for today’s session is the fact that I have never wavered in my support of comprehensive immigration reform. We did put forward a DREAM Act that was passed in the House, got the overwhelming majority of support from Democrats in the Senate, and was blocked by the Republican Party.
 
We now are confronted with a choice between two candidates in which the candidate sitting here with you today is committed to comprehensive immigration reform, is committed to the DREAM Act, has taken administrative actions to prevent young people from being deported. And that stands in contrast with the other candidate who has said he would veto the DREAM Act, that he is uncertain about what his plan for immigration reform would be, and who considers the Arizona law a model for the nation and has suggested that the main solution for immigration is self-deportation.
 
So the issue here for voters -- whose vision best represents the aspirations not just of the Latino community but of all Americans who believe that we are a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants? And that candidate, I believe, is talking to you right now. (Applause.)
 
Q I'm going to ask you some questions -- you promised that on Facebook -- and we have received this question: If you are reelected, do you think you’ll be able to have immigration reform even though there’s a majority of Republican representatives? How can you promise the same thing if you’re not going to be able to do that?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, I’m not going to concede that Republicans necessarily are controlling the Congress. That’s why we have elections. (Applause.)
 
But let’s assume that the Republicans do retain the House, let’s say. What I can -- what I’m absolutely certain of is if the Latino community and the American community that cares about this issue turns out to vote, they can send a message that this is not something to use as a political football, that people’s lives are at stake, that this is a problem that we can solve and historically has had bipartisan support.
 
And I actually think the mindset within the Republican Party can change -- because when you think about it, not only was it fairly recently that we had some Republican support, but even now you have voices like the former governor of Florida, Jeb Bush, who has said that the Republican Party has taken an extreme view, a wrong approach when it comes to immigration reform.
 
So my hope is, is that after the election -- when the number-one goal is no longer beating me, but hopefully the number-one goal is solving the country’s problems -- if they have seen that people who care about this issue have turned out in strong numbers, that they will rethink it, if not because it’s the right thing to do, at least because it’s in their political interest to do so.
 
Q Mr. President, you have been the President who has made the largest number of deportations in history -- more than 1.5 million so far. You’ve separated many families. There are more than 5,000 children who are American citizens in foster care and in the adoption process. Would you just -- since you’ve granted deferred action, would you like to do something -- consider doing something similar to other groups of non-criminal illegal immigrants such as the parents of U.S.-born children?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, let me describe sort of how we’ve tried to approach this given that we haven’t gotten comprehensive immigration reform done yet. My instructions to the Department of Homeland Security has been that we have to focus our attention, our enforcement, on people who genuinely pose a threat to our communities, not to hardworking families who are minding their own business and oftentimes have members of their family who are U.S. citizens -- because that’s a -- that's a priority in terms of limited enforcement resources. We don’t have the capacity to enforce across the board when you’re talking about millions of people. And we’ve done that.
 
So more than half of our enforcement now is directed at people with criminal records. Of the remaining half, about two-thirds are actually people who are typically apprehended close to the border, so these are not people who have longstanding roots in our community. And what we’ve tried to do then is focus our attention on real threats, and make sure that families of the sort that you describe are not the targets of DHS resources.
 
Now, what I’ve always said is, as the head of the executive branch, there’s a limit to what I can do. Part of the reason that deportations went up was Congress put a whole lot of money into it, and when you have a lot of resources and a lot more agents involved, then there are going to be higher numbers. What we’ve said is, let’s make sure that you’re not misdirecting those resources. But we’re still going to, ultimately, have to change the laws in order to avoid some of the heartbreaking stories that you see coming up occasionally. And that’s why this continues to be a top priority of mine.
 
The steps we’ve taken with the DREAM Act kids, one of the great things about it is to see that the country as a whole has actually agreed with us on this. There are voices in the Republican Party have been very critical, but the good news is, is that the majority of Americans have said, you know what, if somebody lives here, has gone to school here, pledges allegiance to our flag, this is the only country they’ve known, they shouldn’t be sent away. We should embrace them and say we want you to help build this country.
 
So we’ve got public opinion on our side on that issue. And we will continue to make sure that how we enforce is done as fairly and justly as possible. But until we have a law in place that provides a pathway for legalization and/or citizenship for the folks in question, we’re going to be -- continue to be bound by the law. And that’s a challenge.
 
Q Mr. President, the fact that you mentioned deferred action was granted months before the election has led some of your critics to say that it was just only to win the Hispanic vote. Why didn’t you do that earlier during your presidency?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think if you take a look at the polls, I was winning the Latino vote before we took that action -- partly because the other side had completely abandoned their commitment to things like comprehensive immigration reform.
 
But I did this because I met young people all across the country -- wonderful kids who sometimes were valedictorians, would participate in the community, has aspirations to go to college, some who were serving in our military -- and if you heard their stories, there’s no way that you would think it was fair or just for us to have them suffering under a cloud of deportation.
 
And so part of the challenge as President is constantly saying, what authorities do I have. What we wanted to do was first make sure that we were directing our enforcement resources towards criminals and we’ve done that. And after we put that system in place we said, you know what, we’re still hearing stories of young people being scared about being deported; it’s time to see if we can take even further action. And that’s what we’ve done.
 
Q Thank you. Mr. President, now we are going to talk about education.
 
Q One out of 10 Hispanics -- only one out of 10 graduates from college. And you know that one out of three, not even 25 percent, finishes high school.
 
And this is the question: First of all, I want to say, Mr. President, it’s an honor for me to be here. I’m a candidate for a doctorate in special education studies at the university level. So I would like to know, what do you attribute the dropout rate among Hispanics in the United States -- 15 percent -- and what plans do you have to change that?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, one of my most important plans is to make sure that people like you can continue your studies and help solve the problem. And that’s why we’ve put such a big emphasis on making sure that college is affordable.
 
And some of the work that we’ve done over the last four years to make sure that the student loan interest rate stays low, expanding Pell grants for millions of students, including millions of Latino students, so that we are seeing the highest college enrollment rate among Latino students in history -- all that is going to help to contribute to us being able to deal with the problem of secondary and high school educations because you're going to be inspiring a whole lot of students to say, I can do that, too; I can achieve that dream.
 
Now, one of the things we know is going to make a big difference is early childhood education. So we've put enormous effort not only in providing additional funding for early childhood education, but also to improve the quality of early childhood education -- because not all programs work perfectly.
 
We've also been very proud to be able to initiate reform in 46 states around the country -- almost every state has initiated reforms -- because what we've said is we'll give you more money if you initiate reforms that focus on dropout rates, that focus on some of the hardest-to-reach students, that focus on getting great teachers in the classroom and holding yourself to high standards and accountability.
 
So we've seen already gains in math and science in many of these schools. We've given additional dollars to some schools, predominantly Latino and African American, where the dropout rate is sky-high. And we've said, in some cases, you may just have to rework the school entirely. Get a great principal in there, hire wonderful teachers, and we will provide you additional help.
 
Now, for those of you who care deeply about education -- because education was a gateway of opportunity for me, for Michelle, and for many of the people sitting here -- this should be a vital decision that guides you in this upcoming election. Because even as we've done all this work to make sure that college is more affordable, that we're reforming our schools, what you've seen on the other side and what's been proposed by my opponent is a budget that would cut 20 percent of education funding, that would roll back tax credits that we're providing middle-class families to help them send their kids to college, that would put billions of dollars back into the hands of banks as middlemen for the student loan program, which would then eliminate or reduce funding for Pell grants for millions of students around the country.
 
So, across the board, what you'll hear from my opponent and from some of his allies in Congress is, we care deeply about education, but they don't put their money where their mouth is. Their budget doesn’t reflect those values.
 
And I'm a firm believer that money alone can't solve the problem. Parents, we have to make sure that we're turning off the TV and providing a quiet space for our kids to do their homework. Teachers have to inspire. Principals have to lead. But ultimately, along with reform efforts, we also have to make sure that we don't have overcrowded classrooms and textbooks that are outdated.
 
I was in Las Vegas talking to some wonderful teachers in a predominantly Latino district, and the teachers were telling me, at the start of school we've got 42 kids in the classroom. Some kids are sitting on the floor until they eventually get reassigned. They lose two weeks of instruction time just because the classrooms are so overcrowded. There are schools, particular in Latino communities, all across this country where kids are still studying in trailers. They don't have regular classrooms, textbooks that are decades old.
 
Now, if we truly believe that education is the key not only for opportunity but also for making sure we can compete in this 21st century economy that is not a tolerable situation. And I put forward specific plans, with the budget behind it, to deal with these issues. And my opponent would actually roll back the process that we’ve already made.
 
Q Mr. President, we have time, but we have many more questions. We’re going to take a break and then we’ll be right back with many of those most important questions that Hispanics want to ask of the President, Barack Obama. (Applause.)
 
 * * *
 
Q We’ll continue with this special program right here because the debate commission didn’t want to have any Hispanic or African American journalists. So we decided to have our own meeting.
 
THE PRESIDENT: We're thrilled to be here. (Applause.)
 
Q We have an education question. I think that it’s something that reminded problems our country has was the recent strike of 29,000 teachers who left 350,000 students out of school, and we have a question about that. This is a Facebook question: What is your plan to solve the present education crisis? What happened in Chicago could also happen in California and other states very soon. Are you concerned about that?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, obviously what happened in Chicago was of concern, and we’re glad that it finally got resolved. But you’re going to see school districts all across the country dealing with this issue because part of what has happened over the last four years is a lot of teacher layoffs.
 
Now, when I first came into office, one of the most important things that we had to do was to help states and local communities not lay off teachers. And that was part of what the Recovery Act was all about -- was providing states with help. Because we can’t afford to be laying off teachers when other countries are hiring teachers.
 
Unfortunately, though, we’ve still seen a lot of school districts lay off teachers. That has an impact on the students themselves because when you have larger classes, it’s harder to provide the individualized attention on those kids, especially at the younger grades.
 
This is, again, why the difference between the two candidates in this election is so important. If Governor Romney's and Congressman Ryan’s budgets were introduced, you would see even less -- by a magnitude of 20 percent -- even less resources from the federal government to the states, and you could see potentially even more teachers being laid off, working conditions for teachers becoming worse, potentially more strikes.
 
And what we say to school districts all across the country is, we will provide you more help as long as you’re being held accountable. And as far as teachers go, I think they work as hard as anybody, but we also want to make sure that they are having high standards of performance, especially in math and science. So one of the plans that I presented at the convention was I want to hire 100,000 new math and science teachers, because that’s how teachers do better, students do better, the likelihood of strikes become lower.
 
Q Mr. President, I had the opportunity to watch our conversation with Mitt Romney yesterday, but previously in a video he has said that he was not concerned about the 47 percent of the population in the United States. But yesterday he said that he wanted to be the President of 100 percent of Americans. For you, which is the two is the true Mitt Romney? (Laughter.)
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, here’s what I would say. First of all, I’ve been President now for almost four years. But the day I was elected, that night in Grant Park where I spoke to the country, I said, 47 percent of the people didn’t vote for me, but I’ve heard your voices and I’m going to work just as hard for you as I did for those who did vote for me. That’s how you have to operate as a President. I truly believe that. (Applause.)
 
I think your question, Jorge, about what’s the real Mitt Romney is better directed to Mr. Romney. But I will say this. When you express an attitude that half the country considers itself victims, that somehow they want to be dependent on government, my thinking is maybe you haven’t gotten around a lot, because I travel around the country all the time and the American people are the hardest working there are. (Applause.)
 
And their problem is not that they're not working hard enough, or they don't want to work, or they're being taxed too little, or they just want to loaf around and gather government checks. We’ve gone through a challenging time. People want a hand up, not a handout.
 
Are there people who abuse the system? Yes, both at the bottom and at the top -- because there are a whole bunch of millionaires who aren’t paying taxes at all either. (Applause.) But when you look -- last point I’d make -- when you look statistically, it turns out that even if people aren’t paying income taxes, they're paying payroll taxes. They're paying gas taxes. They're paying sales taxes. They're paying state and local taxes.
 
So the fact of the matter is that the few people who are not paying -- the people who are not paying income taxes are either paying a lot of taxes because they're working every day but they just don't make enough money overall to pay income tax; or alternatively, they're senior citizens; or they’re students who -- I know these guys aren’t making a lot of money, even with some work-study program. (Laughter.) Or they're disabled; or, in some cases, they're veterans or soldiers who are fighting for us right now overseas -- they don't pay an income tax.
 
And so I just think it’s very important for us to understand Americans work hard, and if they're not working right now, I promise you they want to get to work. And that's what my economic plan is designed to do, to get more people back to work, and to lift up the middle class and people who want to work to get into the middle class. (Applause.)
 
Q Mr. President, I am a student at the journalism school at UM. This is my question to you. What would you recommend to Latina women such as me in order to be successful in my search for employment in the United States?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, you’ve got great role models here in journalism, particularly Maria Elena Salinas. (Laughter.)
 
Q Thank you. Because I ask you the tough questions.
 
THE PRESIDENT: But, look, the economy has been very tough for the last four years, and so there are a lot of young people out there who’ve graduated, have a great education, but have still had trouble getting work. The good news is over the last 30 months we’ve seen job growth every single month -- 4.5 million new jobs.
 
The most important thing you can do, the best investment you can make to make sure you have a good job is to get a college education. So what you’re doing now cuts in half the likelihood that you end up unemployed.
 
The most important message, I guess I would tell you, though, is what I tell my daughters, which is that America remains a country where if you work hard and you don't give up and you are persistent, you can succeed. And the good news is that because of some of the battles that were fought before you were born and, in some cases, before I was born, opportunity is opening up for more and more people -- for women, for Latinas, Latinos, for African Americans. So you can go as far as your dreams will take you.
 
The big concern that I have is making sure that as you’re paying for your education, you don't get burdened with tons of debt. And that’s why we focus so much on taking billions of dollars that were going to banks and making sure that we cut out the middlemen, provide some of these loans directly to students, or grants directly to students. And now we're working with colleges and universities to keep tuition lower in order to make sure that when you get that first job, it may not pay everything you want -- my first job, by the way, I made $10,000 a year.
 
So there's nothing wrong with taking a job that doesn’t pay a lot if it's what you're interested in, as long as you don’t have these huge debt burdens that so many young people have now. And that’s a big contrast in this election. (Applause.)
 
Q Mr. President, we have a question that is very important for us and also our neighbors in Mexico. You have supported the President Calderón policy against drug trafficking. Now, there's a new President who will be taking office at the same time if you were to win. So do you think that after 65,000 deaths it's time to change the strategy? Can you consider the 65,000 a failure and the policy should change?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, obviously, there has been an extraordinary battle within Mexico to try to gain control over territories that, in some cases, have been just terrorized by these drug cartels. And I commend President Calderón for his courage in standing up to these cartels, and we have worked very closely and cooperatively with them in dealing with this issue.
 
Now, what I will be saying to the new President of Mexico when he takes office is that we want to continue that cooperation, and we recognize this is a threat on both sides of the border. We make a mistake if we just say this is Mexico's problem because we obviously generate a lot of demand for drugs in this country, and guns and cash flow south at the same time as drugs flow north. That’s why --
 
Q How many more people have to die before this issue --
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, what we need to do is to weaken the grip of these drug cartels, and there are a couple of things we can do. Number one, the United States can focus on drug treatment and prevention, and helping people deal with addiction, making sure that young people are not getting hooked on drugs. If we can reduce demand, that means less cash flowing into these drug cartels. And we have actually beefed up our investment and support of prevention, because we have to treat this as a public health problem here in the United States, not just a law enforcement problem.
 
The other thing that we try to do is to work much more aggressively in preventing the flow of guns and cash down into Mexico. And so interdiction has to work both ways.
 
But ultimately, Mexico is also going to have to come to terms with the fact that in some communities and in some cities, law enforcement has been outgunned or compromised by the strength of these drug cartels. And we want to help them, but they’re going to also have to take action to continue to keep pressure on these drugs cartels. And that includes not just police, by the way, it also means the judiciary, their prosecutors -- that if they capture drug kingpins that they actually stay in jail.
 
There’s a whole series of issues involved in law enforcement, and we’re proving them advice, but ultimately they’re a sovereign country and they’re going to have to take some of those steps as well. But we want to be partners with them throughout this process.
 
Q Mr. President, you told me during an interview that you -- Eric Holder or you did not authorize the Fast and Furious operation that allowed 2,000 weapons from the United States to Mexico, and they were in drug-trafficking hands. I think that up to 100 Mexicans might have died, and also American agent, Brian Terry. There’s a report that 14 agents were responsible for the operation. But shouldn’t Attorney General Eric Holder -- he should have known about that. And if he didn’t, should you fire him?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, I think it’s important for us to understand that the Fast and Furious program was a field-initiated program begun under the previous administration. When Eric Holder found out about it, he discontinued it. We assigned an inspector general to do a thorough report that was just issued, confirming that, in fact, Eric Holder did not know about this, that he took prompt action and the people who did initiate this were held accountable.
 
But what I think is most important is recognizing that we’ve got a challenge in terms of weapons flowing south. And the strategy that was pursued, obviously, out of Arizona, was completely wrongheaded. Those folks who were responsible have been held accountable. The question now is how do we move forward with a strategy that will actually work.
 
And we are going to have to work with Mexican law enforcement to accomplish this. But I will tell you that Eric Holder has my complete confidence because he has shown himself to be willing to hold accountable those who took these actions and is passionate about making sure that we’re preventing guns from getting into the wrong hands.
 
Q But if you have nothing to hide then why are you not releasing papers to this?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, actually, the truth is we’ve released thousands of papers --
 
Q But not all of them.
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, we’ve released almost all of them. The ones that we don’t release typically relate to internal communications that were not related to the actual Fast and Furious operation.
 
And so the challenge that we have is that at any given moment in the federal government, there may be people who do dumb things. And I’ve seen it, I promise. (Laughter.) And ultimately, I’m responsible, and my key managers, including the Attorney General, are responsible, for holding those people accountable, for making sure that they are fired if they do dumb things, and then fixing the system to ensure that it doesn’t happen again. And I’m very confident that you will not see any kind of actions like this in the future.
 
But what I don’t like to see is these kinds of issues becoming political circuses or ways to score political points in Congress -- partly because it becomes a distraction from us doing the business that we need to do for the American people.
 
Q Very briefly, talking about the same question -- you know we have just one minute left. Why don’t just have an independent investigation? Because at the end of the day, it was just the Justice Department investigating its boss and saying that he’s not at fault. Why don’t we have -- very briefly -- independent investigation that is not from the Justice Department?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Maria Elena, understand that not only have we had multiple hearings in Congress, but the inspector general is put in place specifically to be independent from the Attorney General. And this Attorney General’s report was not a whitewash in any way. I mean, it was tough on the Justice Department. And it indicated that potentially more supervision was needed; people should have known in some cases, even if they didn’t actually know. So it was, I think, independent, honest. It was a clear assessment of what had gone wrong in that situation.
 
And we are happy to continue to provide the information that is relevant to this. But one of the things that happens in Washington is, very quickly these issues become political distractions as opposed to us actually solving the problems that we need to solve. And this issue of guns flowing south is a hard issue to solve. Because this country respects the Second Amendment; we want to protect the rights of gun owners and those who are seeking to purchase firearms. But oftentimes that’s exploited as well. And so we’ve got to make sure that we’re properly balancing the rights of U.S. citizens, but making sure that we’re also interdicting those arms that would get into the hands of criminals.
 
Q Mr. President, thank you so much. We’re going to have a last break and then we’re going to continue with a President Barack Obama. Thank you so much. (Applause.)
 
 * * *
 
Q Something different, something personal. I don't know what you're reading before going to sleep right now. I don’t know if you have already read the book "No Easy Day," in which a Navy SEAL tells the story of how Osama bin Laden was killed. According to many, his death was your biggest achievement. What is your biggest failure?
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, Jorge, as you remind me, my biggest failure so far is we haven’t gotten comprehensive immigration reform done. (Laughter.) So we’re going to be continuing to work on that. (Applause.) But it’s not for lack of trying or desire, and I’m confident we’re going to accomplish that.
 
Obviously the fact that we haven’t been able to change the tone in Washington is disappointing. We know now that as soon as I came into office you already had meetings among some of our Republican colleagues saying, how do we figure out how to beat the President. And I think that I’ve learned some lessons over the last four years, and the most important lesson I’ve learned is that you can’t change Washington from the inside. You can only change it from the outside. That’s how I got elected, and that’s how the big accomplishments like health care got done, was because we mobilized the American people to speak out. That’s how we were able to cut taxes for middle-class families.
 
So something that I’d really like to concentrate on in my second term is being in a much more constant conversation with the American people so that they can put pressure on Congress to help move some of these issues forward. (Applause.)
 
Q Yes, as you said, that’s your biggest failure and Jorge asked you do you consider that you broke your promise. So I think the answer is, yes, with many excuses, but you actually broke your promise.
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, what I will say this -- what I’ll say is that -- that I haven’t gotten everything done that I wanted to get done. And that’s why I’m running for a second term -- because we’ve still got more work to do. (Applause.)
 
The good news is I think that we can build on the progress that we’ve made. The actions we took in terms of deferred action give us the basis now to get something done for the DREAMers, to get comprehensive immigration reform done.
 
The progress that we’ve made in helping young people finance their college educations serves as a basis for us to continue to try to bring tuition down and college graduation rates up. The 4.5 million jobs that we’ve already created gives us the basis for us now doubling down on manufacturing, and making sure that community colleges are training people for the jobs that are out there right now. The opportunities that we have in implementing health care -- which is going to be providing millions of Americans, including millions of Latinos, for the first time, who've worked so hard, the peace of mind of knowing that they have affordable health care.
 
All those issues are ones that we’re very proud of, but we know we’re not done yet. And that’s exactly why this election is going to be so important.
 
Q Mr. President, thank you so much for spending this hour with us. And as we said yesterday, we did the same with Mitt Romney, and we want to give you the opportunity for you to talk to our audience on camera. So you can talk to Hispanics to try to convince them, for them to vote for you.
 
THE PRESIDENT: Well, it is my pleasure. Thank you so much for the time that you’ve given me and for this audience. And the U of Miami, thank you. We appreciate you. (Applause.)
 
I truly believe this is the most important election of our lifetimes. We’ve gone through some very tough times together over these last four years. But now we’ve got a choice about how we move forward.
 
My opponents, they think that if we provide tax cuts to folks at the very top, that somehow that’s going to result in jobs and opportunity for everybody. I’ve got a different philosophy. What I believe is, is that our economy grows best when it grows from the middle out and the bottom up; when everybody has got a fair shot and everybody is doing their fair share, and everybody is playing by the same rules.
 
And so the plan that I put forward in terms of making sure that we are creating a million manufacturing jobs, that we’re providing tax breaks to companies that are investing and hiring here in the United States as opposed to shipping jobs overseas, the plan to make sure that we continue to expand opportunities for young people, making college affordable, hiring 100,000 new math and science teachers, an energy strategy that says, yes, we’re going to increase production of oil and gas and continue to cut our oil imports but also we’re developing wind power and solar power that will create new jobs and help to clean our environment, and the plan to reduce our deficit in a way that’s balanced so that we’re not providing tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires that result in massive cuts in education or that would somehow turn Medicare into a voucher -- those plans that I’ve put forward I’m confident can work, but they can only work with you.
 
So one thing that I saw in 2008 is that when the American people come together and decide that they are going to fight for the values and ideals that made this country great, we can’t be stopped. And I would urge everybody who is watching to look at my plan, look at Mr. Romney’s plan -- compare who has got a better answer for middle-class families and everybody who is striving to get into the middle class.
 
And for the Latino community, I would say that the work that we’ve done on education, on immigration, on housing, on putting people back to work, on making sure that small businesses have access to financing -- those are all issues that are representative of what you care about, your values. But you’ve got to get out there and you’ve got to make sure that you express that with your ballot.
 
So I would urge you to vote and I would ask you to vote for me and Democrats up and down the ticket. I think it will deliver for you in the future.
 
Thank you so much. (Applause.)
 
END
2:11 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Presidential Nominations Sent to the Senate

NOMINATIONS SENT TO THE SENATE:

Ketanji Brown Jackson, of Maryland, to be United States District Judge for the District of Columbia, vice Henry Harold Kennedy, retired.

Robert D. Okun, of the District of Columbia, to be an Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia for the term of fifteen years, vice Linda Kay Davis, retired.

Nelson Stephen Román, of New York, to be United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, vice Richard M. Berman, retired.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts

WASHINGTON – Today, President Barack Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to key Administration posts:

• Sylvia M. Becker – Member, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States
• Bibiana Boerio – Director of the Mint, Department of the Treasury
• Robert F. Godec – Ambassador to the Republic of Kenya, Department of State
• Keith Kelly – Assistant Secretary for Veterans’ Employment and Training, Department of Labor
• Beth J. Rosenberg – Member, Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board
• Cheryl Saban – Representative of the United States to the Sixty-seventh Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations,
• Frederick Vollrath – Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness and Force Management, Department of Defense
• Tony West – Associate Attorney General, Department of Justice
• Joe Eldridge – Member, Board of Directors of the United States Institute of Peace
• George E. Moose – Member, Board of Directors of the United States Institute of Peace

President Obama said, “Our nation will be greatly served by the talent and expertise these men and women bring to their new roles.  I am grateful they have agreed to serve in this Administration, and I look forward to working with them in the months and years ahead.”

President Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to key Administration posts:

Sylvia M. Becker, Nominee for Member, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States
Sylvia M. Becker is a Partner at Kaye Scholer, LLP.  She joined the firm in 1988 as an Associate and was named Partner in 1999.  In 1990, Ms. Becker was awarded a Robert Bosch Foundation Fellowship, during which she worked at the German Foreign Ministry and at German trial and appellate courts responsible for intellectual property and competition cases.  From 1987 to 1988, she was a Women’s Law and Public Policy Fellow and served at the Women’s Legal Defense Fund, now known as the National Partnership for Women and Families.  Ms. Becker received a B.S.F.S. and a J.D./M.S.F.S. joint degree in Law and International Affairs from Georgetown University.

Bibiana Boerio, Nominee for Director of the Mint, Department of the Treasury
Bibiana Boerio served as Special Advisor to the President and CEO of the Detroit Regional Chamber of Commerce from March 2011 to February 2012. From 2008 to 2010, Ms. Boerio was the Chief of Staff for Congressman Joe Sestak. Previously, Ms. Boerio worked at Ford Motor Company for over 30 years, including as Managing Director for Jaguar Cars, Ltd. from 2004 to 2007, Director of Finance and Strategy for Ford International Operations from 2003 to 2004, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Ford Motor Credit Company from 2000 to 2003. She received a B.S. from Seton Hill College and an M.B.A. from the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Business.

Ambassador Robert F. Godec, Nominee for Ambassador to the Republic of Kenya, Department of State
Ambassador Robert F. Godec, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, Class of Minister-Counselor, is currently Chargé d'affaires at the United States Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya.  From 2009 to 2012, he was Principal Deputy Coordinator for Counterterrorism at the Department of State, and from 2006 to 2009, he served as the U.S. Ambassador to Tunisia.  Ambassador Godec served as a Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs from 2005 to 2006 and as Deputy Coordinator for Iraq from 2004 to 2005.  Ambassador Godec’s overseas posts include: Acting Deputy Chief of Mission (2002), Minister Counselor for Economic Affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Pretoria, South Africa (1999-2002), and Economic Counselor at the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya (1996 -1999).  Additional posts in Washington include: Assistant Office Director for Thailand and Burma in the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs (1994-1996), and Director for Southeast Asian Affairs at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (1992-1994).  Ambassador Godec received a B.A. from the University of Virginia and an M.A. from Yale University. 

Keith Kelly, Nominee for Assistant Secretary for Veterans’ Employment and Training, Department of Labor
Keith Kelly is the Commissioner of the Montana Department of Labor and Industry (DLI), a position he has held since January 2005.  Mr. Kelly previously worked at DLI as the Administrator for the Unemployment Insurance Division from 2002 to 2004.  From 2001 to 2002, Mr. Kelly was President of Kelly & Associates, LLC.  From 1997 to 2001, Mr. Kelly served as Administrator of the Farm Service Agency and Executive Vice President of the Commodity Credit Corporation at the United States Department of Agriculture.  He was Director of the Arizona Department of Agriculture from 1990 to 1997, and Director of the Montana Department of Agriculture from 1983 to 1989.  Mr. Kelly served as Chair and Vice Chair of the Veterans Affairs Committee of the National Association of State Workforce Agencies from 2009 to 2010.  He was awarded a Bronze Star and the Combat Infantryman’s Badge for his service with the Army’s 101st Airborne Division.  Mr. Kelly received a B.S. in Agriculture Business and an M.S. in Economics and Agriculture Economics from Montana State University.

Dr. Beth J. Rosenberg, Nominee for Member, Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board
Dr. Beth J. Rosenberg is an Assistant Professor in the Public Health Program at Tufts University School of Medicine, a position she has held since 1996.  Since 2005, she has researched the safety systems and health and safety conditions at former nuclear weapons production sites.  From 2000 to 2008, Dr. Rosenberg served as a member of the Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Scientific Advisory Board.  Dr. Rosenberg received a B.A. in Anthropology from Wellesley College, an M.P.H. in Health Law from Boston University School of Public Health, and a Sc.D. in Work Environment Policy from the University of Massachusetts Lowell.

Cheryl  Saban, Nominee for Representative of the United States of America to the Sixty-seventh Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations
Cheryl Saban is an author, philanthropist, and advocate for women and children.   As an author, her work focuses predominantly on family, women's empowerment, and healthcare.  In 2009, she founded the non-profit organization Women’s Self Worth Foundation.  Ms. Saban serves on the boards of The Saban Research Institute, Girls Inc., and Children’s Hospital Los Angeles.  She is a member of the American Psychological Association.  Previously, she served on the Board of Overseers at the Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California (2008-2011), the Board of Directors of the Los Angeles Universal Preschool (2004-2007), and as a Commissioner for the City of Los Angeles Commission for Children, Youth, and Their Families (2002-2003).  She received a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. from California Coast University. 

Frederick Vollrath, Nominee for Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness and Force Management, Department of Defense
Frederick Vollrath is Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness and Force Management.  Prior to his appointment in March 2012, he had been the President of Vollrath Consulting since 2006.  Previously, from 1999 to 2006, he was Corporate Vice President of Human Resources for the Computer Sciences Corporation.  After 35 years of military service, Mr. Vollrath retired from the Army in 1998 with the rank of Lieutenant General as the Army’s Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel, a role that he held from 1996 to 1998.  Prior to this position, he served as the U.S. Army Europe Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel in Heidelberg, Germany (1994-1995), the Director of Enlisted Personnel Management (1989-1992), and as the Commanding General for the Personnel Information Systems Command in Alexandria, Virginia (1988-1989).  He received a B.A. from the University of Miami and an M.A. from Central Michigan University.

Tony West, Nominee for Associate Attorney General, Department of Justice
Tony West is Acting Associate Attorney General and Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division at the United States Department of Justice.  Previously, Mr. West was a partner at the law firm of Morrison & Foerster, LLP from 2001 to 2009, and served as a state Special Assistant Attorney General in California from 1999 to 2001.  From 1994 to 1999, he was an Assistant United States Attorney for the Northern District of California, and from 1993 to 1994, he served as Special Assistant to the Deputy Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice.  Mr. West received a B.A. from Harvard College and a J.D. from Stanford Law School, where he was elected President of the Stanford Law Review.

Rev. Joe Eldridge, Nominee for Member, Board of Directors of the United States Institute of Peace
Rev. Joe Eldridge is University Chaplain and Adjunct Faculty in the School of International Service at American University, a position he has held since 1997.  Prior to joining American University, he helped establish the Washington D.C. office for the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, now known as Human Rights First, serving as the office’s Director from 1991 to 1997.  Prior to his work at the office for the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, he spent the early part of his career working on international human rights and humanitarian issues.  Rev. Eldridge received a B.A. from Tennessee Wesleyan College, an M.T.S. from Perkins School of Theology at Southern Methodist University, an M.A. from American University, and a D.Min. from Wesley Theological Seminary.

Ambassador George E. Moose, Nominee for Member, Board of Directors of the United States Institute of Peace
Ambassador George E. Moose is an adjunct professor of practice at the Elliott School of International Affairs at The George Washington University.  He has also been a Member of the Board of Directors of the United States Institute of Peace since 2007, and currently serves as the Board's Vice Chairman.  Ambassador Moose served as a career member of the Foreign Service for over 30 years.  His assignments included posts in Asia, Africa, the Caribbean, and Europe.  From 1998 to 2001, he served as Representative of the United States of America to the European Office of the United Nations, with the rank of Ambassador, in Geneva.  From 1993 to 1997, he was Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, before which he served as Alternate Representative to the United Nations Security Council from 1991 to 1992.  From 1988 to 1991, he was the United States Ambassador to Senegal, and from 1983 to 1986, he was the United States Ambassador to the Republic of Benin.  Ambassador Moose received a B.A. and an Honorary Doctorate of Laws from Grinnell College.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama Nominates Two to the United States District Courts

WASHINGTON, DC- Today, President Obama nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson and Judge Nelson Stephen Román for District Court judgeships.
 
“I am pleased to nominate these distinguished individuals to serve on the United States District Court bench,” said President Obama.  “I am confident they will serve the American people with integrity and a steadfast commitment to justice.”
 
Ketanji Brown Jackson:  Nominee for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Ketanji Brown Jackson currently serves as Vice Chair and Commissioner of the United States Sentencing Commission, a position she has held since 2010.  Previously, Jackson worked at Morrison & Foerster LLP from 2007 to 2010 and served as an Assistant Federal Public Defender in the District of Columbia from 2005 to 2007.  From 2003 to 2005, she was an Assistant Special Counsel at the Sentencing Commission and, prior to that, spent four years working in private practice in both Boston and the District of Columbia.  From 1999 to 2000, she clerked for Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer of the Supreme Court of the United States; from 1997 to 1998, she clerked for the Honorable Bruce M. Selya of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit; and from 1996 to 1997, she clerked for the Honorable Patti B. Saris of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.  Jackson received her J.D. cum laude in 1996 from Harvard Law School, where she was supervising editor of the Harvard Law Review.  She received her B.A. magna cum laude in 1992 from Harvard University. 
 
Judge Nelson Stephen Román:  Nominee for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Judge Nelson Stephen Román has been an Associate Justice of the First Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court since 2009.  Previously, he served as a Justice of the New York Supreme Court in Bronx County, where he handled civil matters from 2003 to 2009.  For four years, Judge Román was a judge on the New York City Civil Court, handling civil matter from 2001 to 2002 and housing cases from 1998 to 2000.  He clerked for the Honorable Jose A. Padilla, Jr. of the New York City Civil Court from 1995 to 1998.  From 1989 to 1995, Judge Román served as an Assistant District Attorney in both Brooklyn and Manhattan.  Prior to receiving his J.D. in 1989 from Brooklyn Law School, Judge Román worked as a police officer in New York City for seven years.  He received his B.A. from Fordham University in 1984.
 

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama Nominates Robert Okun to Serve on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia

WASHINGTON, DC- Today, President Obama nominated Robert Okun to serve on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

“Throughout his career, Robert Okun has demonstrated an unwavering commitment to justice,” said President Obama.  “I am proud to nominate him to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.”

Robert D. Okun:  Nominee for the Superior Court of the District of Columbia
Robert D. Okun is Chief of the Special Proceedings Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, which handles all post-conviction motions filed in D.C. Superior Court and the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.  He also has served as Executive Assistant U.S. Attorney for Operations, and as Special Counsel to the U.S. Attorney for Professional Development and Legal Policy, and he advises and trains Assistant U.S. Attorneys on issues involving ethics and the Rules of Professional Conduct.  Prior to his service at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Okun served as a trial attorney in the Department of Justice’s Office of Consumer Litigation and in the Fraud Section of the Civil Division, as well as in the Office of Policy and Evaluation at the Federal Trade Commission.  Okun earned his B.A. magna cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania and his J.D. cum laude from Harvard Law School.  Following law school, he served as a law clerk for the Honorable Frank E. Schwelb, then-Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney en route Miami, FL, 9/20/2012

Aboard Air Force One
En Route Miami, Florida

12:00 P.M. EDT

MR. CARNEY:  Good morning, everyone.  Good day -- it's 12 o'clock noon.  Thank you for joining us as we make our way south to the great state of Florida.  I think you know what the President is doing there today, so no need to go over the schedule.

I just want to note that there was -- Senator McCain gave an important interview the other day, and I think it's an indication that there's still a possibility of bipartisanship, bipartisan cooperation and agreement, because Senator McCain pointedly complained about the fact that at Nationals Stadium, Teddy Roosevelt -- the mascot for Teddy Roosevelt has yet to ever win the race among the presidents.  This is an outrage.  I agree with Senator McCain.  I'm comfortable saying that my boss agrees with Senator McCain.  After all, it was President Obama who gave the speech I'm sure you all remember in Osawatomie, Kansas last year -- a place and a speech that is very resonant in the history of President Theodore Roosevelt.

With that, we'll take your questions -- unless you have a topper.

MS. PSAKI:  I just wanted to -- since we're on our way to the Univision town hall the President will be doing -- to take a moment just to talk about Mitt Romney's performance last evening. He spent 35 minutes, as I understand it, with the hosts at Univision.  During that time he reminded not only the Latino community, millions of people across the country, but the middle-class families on why they can't trust him. 

Just a few highlights.  Last night he said again he'd veto the DREAM Act.  He criticized the Obama administration's deferred action of policy, refusing to again answer the question -- I think it's been at least half a dozen times he's been asked by multiple networks -- whether he would continue the executive order -- refused to answer that, leaving millions of young people uncertain for months to come.  He doubled down on self-deportation, saying he wanted a long-term solution but refusing to propose his own plan there, and also refusing to include the context of why people would self-deport, because his plan would make it so terrible for Latinos and immigrants across the country.

And finally, he also said he was happy to be the grandfather of the health care plan, which is interesting given that he continues to say he would veto it on his first day in office, leaving 9 million Latinos without health care.  So I'm not sure how that squares, but just wanted to highlight that for all of you.

MR. CARNEY:  Questions.

Q    On this venue today, the thrust of Mitt Romney's argument is that the President's policies -- his economic policies have not helped Latino voters during the last four years.  What's the President's response to that?

MS. PSAKI:  Well, there are a number of issues that Latino voters care about.  Of course, there is immigration policy, and if we start just with that, Mitt Romney has the most extreme position of any candidate in modern history running for President on that issue.  He has endorsed the policy of self-deportation.  He has said the Arizona law should be a model for the country.  He has said he would veto the DREAM Act.

So that alone is not a winning package of policies for Latino families.  But if you take it to more broad issues, including health care, there are 9 million Latinos in this country who have health care because of the Affordable Health Care Act.  Mitt Romney wants to veto that his first day in office.  That's bad news for Latino families.

His budget that he supports would cut education by 20 percent.  This is an issue Latinos care deeply about in this country.  He has said his policy on middle-class tax cuts -- this is an issue that would impact, again, millions of families.

We're happy to line up any day of the week the President's policies, the President's vision on these issues and how they would impact not just middle-class families but Latino families. And I expect you'll hear the President talk about that today.

MR. CARNEY:  Let me just add a couple of things -- that thanks to the President's policies, middle-class Americans have, on average, seen their taxes go down $3,600 since the President took office.  And that includes obviously Hispanic Americans -- middle-class Hispanic Americans.  The President has administratively taken action to allow millions of Americans to take advantage of historically low interest rates.  Latino American homeowners have been able to take advantage of that. 

The President is pressing Congress to take action to allow millions more Americans to take advantage of these historically low interest rates, to refinance and lower their mortgage payments, which would be a boon to Latinos.

Furthermore, one element of the American Jobs Act, which Republicans have adamantly refused to pass and allow to become law, was investments in infrastructure that would put construction workers back on the job.  And as all of you know, the construction industry has a heavy Latino American representation in it.  And if Republicans would, with Mitt Romney's support, stop blocking passage of that provision of the American Jobs Act we'd see many more construction workers back on the job, rebuilding the infrastructure of this country.

Q    The Inspector General report is due out on the Colombia prostitution scandal.  Does the White House have any comment and the fact that FOX News is reporting two White House advance team members will be implicated in that report?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, let me tell you this.  There is an Inspector General report that is not out, we do not have, and none of the people in that anonymously sourced story have seen, by their own admission.  So I have no comment, again, on an IG report that nobody has seen.

Q    So the White House has not seen this report at this time?

MR. CARNEY:  Let me repeat -- nobody has seen -- we have not seen, FOX News’s sources have not seen, and we’ll await the report.

Q    FOX is going to take that?  You’re not going to defend your own reporting?

Q    Jay, does the White House, though, stand by the White House Counsel report from last spring that no White House personnel were involved?

MR. CARNEY:  Yes, as I said at the time, the White House Counsel reviewed and found no evidence of White House staff involvement.

Q    Jay, can I ask you about the President’s call with President Karzai, whether you can give us any more of a sense of whether the President and Mr. Karzai made progress on the green-on-blue violence issue, or any other of the topics that have been kind of a source of some tension in recent months?

MR. CARNEY:  Yes, I can.  Yesterday, the President held a videoconference with President Karzai as part of their regular consultations and following up on their phone call of last week. The two Presidents discussed a range of issues, including efforts to stem insider attacks on U.S. coalition and Afghan forces, the so-called green-on-blue attacks.  They also discussed the importance of continuing to encourage restraint and non-violence in reaction to inflammatory materials, and continued implementation of the U.S.-Afghan Strategic Partnership Agreement. 

The President expressed his condolences and remembrances on the eve of the one-year anniversary of former Afghan President Rabbani’s assassination.  And the two leaders agreed to continue our work together in support of an Afghan-led reconciliation process.

The President reiterated his strong support for Afghan sovereignty, and the two leaders agreed to take additional concrete steps to implement the Strategic Partnership Agreement, including launching the U.S.-Afghan bilateral commission in coming weeks, and beginning negotiations on a bilateral security agreement.

In terms of the green-on-blue attacks, as I said yesterday, this is obviously a matter of concern, and that concern has led to ISAF issuing a directive to heighten protection for -- and take measures to protect our troops on the ground in Afghanistan. And that has led General Allen to make changes in our partnering operation, changes that will enhance security for our forces. 

Q    Jay, we had some positive news in the housing market yesterday.  Does the President get a sense that the housing situation is rebounding?  Is he optimistic?  Just give a sense of where he is.

MR. CARNEY:  Well, as you know, Hans, the housing market was hit extremely hard by the collapse and the Great Recession, and it has proven to be a very challenging problem, one that the President has addressed with numerous initiatives.  Any piece of data that indicates improvement in the housing market is welcome.

But our reaction to individual pieces of data is always fairly muted because we look at trends and we look at what works still needs to be done.  And as I mentioned earlier, there are measures that would become law if only Republicans would support them that would assist millions of now homeowners in refinancing their homes and being able to take advantage of historically low mortgage rates.  And that would also help improve the housing market, the President believes. 

So we welcome positive signs, but we know there is much work to do.

Q    Are we going to get anything from the President on housing today?

MR. CARNEY:  I don’t have a preview for you of his remarks or answers to questions that I don’t know whether he might get.

Q    Let me ask it differently.  Are we going to get anything from the President on piracy today?

MR. CARNEY:  Again, I have no preview of his remarks.

Q    Jay, a couple things on Libya, a follow.  FOX has some intelligence sources saying that al Qaeda was involved in this attack and possibly a former Guantanamo detainee.  So I’m wondering if you have a reaction, comment on that.  And then second, there was a counterterrorism official on the Hill yesterday calling it a terrorist attack.  Any further administration clarification on what you’re classifying the attack?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, let me -- hold on one second, let me find this here.  I think the sources that you cite I think include the open hearing with the NCTC Director, Mr. Olsen, in which he discussed indications of possible involvement of elements of extremist groups, including possible participation by elements of al Qaeda and particularly al Qaeda in the Maghreb, an al Qaeda affiliate.

It is, I think, self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack.  Our embassy was attacked violently, and the result was four deaths of American officials.  So, again, that’s self-evident.  I would point you to a couple of things that Mr. Olsen said, which is that at this point it appears that a number of different elements were involved in the attack, including individuals connected to militant groups that are prevalent in Eastern Libya. 

He also made clear that at this point, based on the information he has -- and he is briefing the Hill on the most up-to-date intelligence -- we have no information at this point that suggests that this was a significantly preplanned attack, but this was the result of opportunism, taking advantage of and exploiting what was happening as a result of reaction to the video that was found to be offensive. 

Q    So just to clarify, does the President see that it was an attack on 9/11, a terrorist attack on 9/11?  Is that the administration or the President's view?

MR. CARNEY:  The attack occurred on September 11, 2012.  So we use the same calendar at the White House that you do, and, yes, he sees it.  I will simply point you to the testimony of Mr. Olsen, in which he said, based on the information that they have now -- and this is an ongoing investigation -- their judgment is that it was an opportunistic attack in which elements including, possibly, elements of al Qaeda in the Maghreb, participated.

Q    I want to go back to something you said, the self-evident part of that.  Just help me understand that.  It was a self-evident terrorist attack because acts of terror were committed?  Or it was self-evident because you've -- because it actually happened on 9/11?

MR. CARNEY:  No, no, no.  I'm sorry.  I meant it was self -- that had this happened on any day of the week in any month, this would have been a terrorist attack.  This was an assault on our embassy, a violent attack on our -- I mean, rather our diplomatic facility there that resulted in the deaths of four Americans.

Q    So it's the definition --

MR. CARNEY:  Correct. 

Q    What's on the President's schedule for the U.N. meetings next week?  Does he have any bilats scheduled with any world leaders?

MR. CARNEY:  We have no bilats scheduled, as we've said all along.  He will obviously be making remarks.  And I have no more than that to provide to you at this time, but there are no bilats scheduled.

Q    He's scheduled to do an interview with The View while he's up in New York.  I mean, how should people look at that?  He has time to do an interview like that, but he doesn’t have time to meet with world leaders?

MR. CARNEY:  I think his engagement with foreign leaders has been, and will continue to be, extremely robust.  We just simply have no formal bilateral meetings scheduled at this time.  If the schedule changes, I will be happy to update you.  As I said yesterday, his attendance at UNGA is in keeping with attendance by past Presidents engaged in a reelection campaign and we’ll be there overnight in New York.

Q    Does he not have time for foreign engagements for leaders?

MR. CARNEY:  No, I'm simply saying that we don’t have any schedule updates for you at this time.  We have no bilateral meetings to announce.  There are none on his schedule at this time.

Q    The President on Letterman the other night and then Joe Biden in Iowa this week really sort of soft-pedaled their discussions of the Mitt Romney video where he talked about the 47 percent of Americans who don’t pay income taxes.  Should we expect to hear sort of a tougher line on that from the President either today or going forward?

MS. PSAKI:  Well, what you heard the President say is absolutely what he believes, which is that when you're elected President, when you're running for President, you represent 100 percent of people in this country, and that the question that we should all raise about that video is, who is Mitt Romney talking about?  Was he talking about military veterans returning from serving overseas who are receiving benefits?  Is he talking about seniors who have worked 50 years and getting Social Security?  Is he talking about students who work two jobs and have student aid?

But that’s absolutely what he believes, is -- well, what his response was, was just that it was disbelief that Mitt Romney was ruling out 50 percent of the country. 

There were clearly many pieces of that video that you all have reported on and talked about in the past couple of days.  I don’t want to preview what the President will talk about.  Obviously, we've said we're looking at this for other forms of paid media.  I don’t have any preview for that either.

But if you look even at the foreign policy pieces of that, in just the last few weeks alone, every time Mitt Romney has dipped his toe into the foreign policy pool, he has raised questions not only among Democrats but among Republicans and people in his own party about whether he's prepared to be Commander-In-Chief.  He offended one of our closest allies -- I guess that’s more than a few weeks ago -- when he went to London. He failed to mention troops in his speech that he gave at the convention.  He stepped over the line in criticizing, accusing the President of sympathizing with the attackers in Libya. 

And again, this week we've seen further evidence that he says something different in public and private.  And I think that just continues to feed into a narrative and raise questions about whether he's prepared on that level.

Q    The Vice President said on Tuesday that there would be plenty of time to discuss the video.  Does that mean that there are other plans --

MS. PSAKI:  -- with us for another 47 days here. 

Q    Are there specific plans as far as how to -- what to do with it as this point, or how --

MS. PSAKI:  I’m not going to preview our strategy.  Obviously, the large question this raises is why is Mitt Romney ruling out 50 percent of the country?  Who are these people he's talking about?  And the Commander-In-Chief question I mentioned. We have a lot of time to go.  There's a lot of discussions, debates, paid media that will be had.  And stay tuned.

Q    Jen, there was a flap last week over the President not meeting in person with Netanyahu in the upcoming UNGA.  Is there any concern that, given Netanyahu's relationship with Mitt Romney, that the Prime Minister may have taken sides in this election?

MS. PSAKI:  I watched the Sunday shows last weekend, as many of you may have as well, and what the Prime Minister made clear during that interview was both that his schedule, as we said, didn’t match up with the President's schedule, and that’s the reason why they couldn’t meet; and second, that he had no desire to get involved or engaged in presidential politics. 

The President enjoys strong support from the Jewish community in this country because they know he has been a steadfast friend of the Jewish state, and he has provided unprecedented security cooperation and assistance to Israel, and he has stood squarely with Israel on the world stage.  And that was a lot of what you heard Prime Minister Netanyahu say on Sunday as well. 

And there are a number -- just to take this to the political side -- there are a number of issues beyond that specific issue that Jewish voters in this country care about -- whether that’s access to affordable health care, making sure middle-class taxes are extended.  And these are the issues that the President will continue to talk about as well as his steadfast support for Israel.

MR. CARNEY:  If I could just add, if you look at what Prime Minister Netanyahu said on Sunday, he made clear that he believes that the President is committed to preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.  And this is obviously a top issue both for the Israelis and for the United States.

And he and Defense Minister Barak have made clear in the past that the level of cooperation and support for Israel’s security that this administration has provided is unprecedented in the U.S.-Israel relationship.  And that’s part -- because of the President’s commitment to Israel’s security, and it will continue.

I would also note that the President spent an hour on the phone with Prime Minister Netanyahu last week and that it is a simple fact that he has spent more time in person and on the phone with Prime Minister Netanyahu than any other foreign leader since he took office.

Q    The President met with Aung San Suu Kyi yesterday.  Does he have any plans to visit Burma when he’s going to be in the region for the Southeast Asian nation summit in November? 

MR. CARNEY:  I have no foreign travel updates for you today.

Q    Aung San Suu Kyi has called a couple of times this week for an easing of -- further easing of U.S. sanctions.  I wonder, did that come up in the meeting he had and if so, did he indicate a willingness to move in that direction?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, there were -- it was a broad conversation.  I’m not going to get into specific items that were discussed.  But the fact is we are working with the government of Burma very effectively on a process that -- whereby reforms undertaken by the government of Burma are met with actions taken by the United States in terms of easing sanctions and other measures.  And that process continues, as Secretary Clinton has discussed.  But we are actively engaged with President Thein Sein on this issue and his government, and we’ll continue to be engaged in that process.

Q    Thanks, Jay.

Q    Can you -- have you called it a terrorist attack before?  Have you said that?

MR. CARNEY:  I haven’t, but -- I mean, people attacked our embassy.  It’s an act of terror by definition.

Q    Yes, I just hadn’t heard you --

MR. CARNEY:  It doesn’t have to do with what date it occurred.

Q    No, I just hadn’t heard the White House say that this was an act of terrorism or a terrorist attack.  And I just --

MR. CARNEY:  I don’t think the fact that we hadn’t is not -- as our NCTC Director testified yesterday, a number of different elements appear to have been involved in the attack, including individuals connected to militant groups that are prevalent in eastern Libya, particularly in the Benghazi area.  We are looking at indications that individuals involved in the attack may have had connections to al Qaeda or al Qaeda’s affiliates, in particular al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.

He also pointed out that -- I’ll point out as well -- that the FBI investigation into this tragedy is ongoing, but according to the best information we have now, we believe it was an opportunistic attack on our mission in Benghazi.  It appears that some well-armed militants seized on the opportunity as the events unfolded that evening.  We do not have any specific intelligence that there was significant advanced planning or coordination for this attack. 

Again, that is the best information we have right now.  There is an ongoing investigation.  As more information becomes available, we’ll evaluate it -- our experts will evaluate it and I’m sure we’ll brief the Hill and make people aware of it. 

Q    Okay.  Thanks, I just -- I just wanted to clarify.

MR. CARNEY:  No worries. 

Q    Does the President aspire to be in the President’s race some day?

MR. CARNEY:  Let history decide.

Q    Pandering to Teddy Roosevelt.

END
12:25 P.M. EDT

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Statement by the President on the One Year Anniversary of the Repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell

A year ago today, we upheld the fundamental American values of fairness and equality by finally and formally repealing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’   Gay and lesbian Americans now no longer need to hide who they love in order to serve the country they love.  It is a testament to the professionalism of our men and women in uniform that this change was implemented in an orderly manner, preserving unit cohesion, recruitment, retention and military effectiveness.   As Commander in Chief, I’ve seen that our national security has been strengthened because we are no longer denied the skills and talents of those patriotic Americans who happen to be gay or lesbian.  The ability of service members to be open and honest about their families and the people they love honors the integrity of the individuals who serve, strengthens the institutions they serve, and is one of the many reasons why our military remains the finest in the world.